{"title":"Correction to: Health insurance and subjective well-being: evidence from integrating medical insurance across urban and rural areas in China.","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/heapol/czae083","DOIUrl":"10.1093/heapol/czae083","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12926,"journal":{"name":"Health policy and planning","volume":" ","pages":"1132"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11562116/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142080129","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Resilience is crucial for a health system to better prevent and respond to public health threats and provide high-quality services. Despite the growing interest in the concept of resilience in health care, however, there is little empirical evidence of the impact of organizational resilience, especially in primary care settings. As the largest professional group in primary care, primary care nurses are taking more and more responsibilities during their daily practice, which influences both their work conditions and well-being. This study aims to examine the association between organizational resilience and primary care nurses' working conditions and well-being. Using a convenience sampling approach, we recruited 175 primary care nurses from 38 community health centres (CHCs) in four cities in China. Organizational resilience was operationalized as comprising two domains: adaptive capacity and planning capacity, and measured using a 16-item scale. The primary care nurses' working condition indicators comprised variables of psychological safety, organizational commitment, professional commitment, and self-directed learning; well-being indicators included depression and burn-out. Hierarchical linear regression models were built for analysis. We found that the sampled CHCs have a relatively high level of organizational resilience. The organizational resilience was positively associated with the four indicators of working conditions: psychological safety (β = 0.04, P < 0.01), organizational commitment (β = 0.38, P < 0.01), professional commitment (β = 0.39, P < 0.01), and self-directed learning (β = 0.28, P < 0.01). However, organizational resilience was not significantly associated with the two well-being indicators. Furthermore, we found that the adaptive capacity has stronger association compared with planning capacity. Therefore, primary care manager should build resilient organizations, especially the adaptive capacity, in order to enhance primary care nurses' psychological safety, commitment and learning behaviours. Further studies should also be conducted to understand the link between organizational resilience and primary care nurses' well-being.
{"title":"Organizational resilience and primary care nurses' work conditions and well-being: a multilevel empirical study in China.","authors":"Wenhua Wang, Mengyao Li, Jinnan Zhang, Ruixue Zhao, Huiyun Yang, Rebecca Mitchell","doi":"10.1093/heapol/czae091","DOIUrl":"10.1093/heapol/czae091","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Resilience is crucial for a health system to better prevent and respond to public health threats and provide high-quality services. Despite the growing interest in the concept of resilience in health care, however, there is little empirical evidence of the impact of organizational resilience, especially in primary care settings. As the largest professional group in primary care, primary care nurses are taking more and more responsibilities during their daily practice, which influences both their work conditions and well-being. This study aims to examine the association between organizational resilience and primary care nurses' working conditions and well-being. Using a convenience sampling approach, we recruited 175 primary care nurses from 38 community health centres (CHCs) in four cities in China. Organizational resilience was operationalized as comprising two domains: adaptive capacity and planning capacity, and measured using a 16-item scale. The primary care nurses' working condition indicators comprised variables of psychological safety, organizational commitment, professional commitment, and self-directed learning; well-being indicators included depression and burn-out. Hierarchical linear regression models were built for analysis. We found that the sampled CHCs have a relatively high level of organizational resilience. The organizational resilience was positively associated with the four indicators of working conditions: psychological safety (β = 0.04, P < 0.01), organizational commitment (β = 0.38, P < 0.01), professional commitment (β = 0.39, P < 0.01), and self-directed learning (β = 0.28, P < 0.01). However, organizational resilience was not significantly associated with the two well-being indicators. Furthermore, we found that the adaptive capacity has stronger association compared with planning capacity. Therefore, primary care manager should build resilient organizations, especially the adaptive capacity, in order to enhance primary care nurses' psychological safety, commitment and learning behaviours. Further studies should also be conducted to understand the link between organizational resilience and primary care nurses' well-being.</p>","PeriodicalId":12926,"journal":{"name":"Health policy and planning","volume":" ","pages":"1065-1073"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11562115/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142285872","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Amanuel Abajobir, Richard de Groot, Caroline Wainaina, Menno Pradhan, Wendy Janssens, Estelle M Sidze
The National Hospital Insurance Fund (NHIF) of Kenya was upgraded to improve access to healthcare for impoverished households, expand universal health coverage, and boost the uptake of essential reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health (RMNCH) services. However, premiums may be unaffordable for the poorest households. The Innovative Partnership for Universal Sustainable Healthcare (i-PUSH) programme targets low-income women and their households to improve their access to and utilization of quality healthcare, including RMNCH services, by providing subsidized, mobile phone-based NHIF coverage in combination with enhanced, digital training of community health volunteers and upgrading of health facilities. This study evaluated whether expanded NHIF coverage increased the accessibility and utilization of quality basic RMNCH services in areas where i-PUSH was implemented using a longitudinal cluster randomized controlled trial in Kakamega, Kenya. A total of 24 pair-matched villages were randomly assigned either to the treatment or the control group. Within each village, 10 eligible households (i.e. with a woman aged 15-49 years who was either pregnant or with a child <4 years old) were randomly selected. The study applied a difference-in-difference methodology based on a pooled cross-sectional analysis of baseline, midline and endline data, with robustness checks based on balanced panels and Analysis of Covariance methods. The analysis sample included 346 women, of whom 248 had had a live birth in the 3 years prior to any of the surveys, and 424 children aged 0-59 months. Improved NHIF coverage did not have a statistically significant impact on any of the RMNCH outcome indicators at midline nor endline. Uptake of RMNCH services, however, improved substantially in both control and treatment areas at endline compared to baseline. For instance, significant increases were observed in the number of antenatal care visits from baseline to midline (mean = 2.62-2.92, P < 0.01) and delivery with a skilled birth attendant from baseline to midline (mean = 0.91-0.97, P < 0.01). Expanded NHIF coverage, providing enhanced access to RMNCH services of unlimited duration at both public and private facilities, did not result in an increased uptake of care, in a context where access to basic public RMNCH services was already widespread. However, the positive overall trend in RMNCH utilization indicators, in a period of constrained access due to the COVID-19 pandemic, suggests that the other components of the i-PUSH programme may have been beneficial. Further research is needed to better understand how the provision of insurance, enhanced community health volunteer training and improved healthcare quality interact to ensure pregnant women and young children can make full use of the continuum of care.
{"title":"The impact of digital interventions on health insurance coverage for reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health services utilization in Kakamega, Kenya: a cluster randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Amanuel Abajobir, Richard de Groot, Caroline Wainaina, Menno Pradhan, Wendy Janssens, Estelle M Sidze","doi":"10.1093/heapol/czae079","DOIUrl":"10.1093/heapol/czae079","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The National Hospital Insurance Fund (NHIF) of Kenya was upgraded to improve access to healthcare for impoverished households, expand universal health coverage, and boost the uptake of essential reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health (RMNCH) services. However, premiums may be unaffordable for the poorest households. The Innovative Partnership for Universal Sustainable Healthcare (i-PUSH) programme targets low-income women and their households to improve their access to and utilization of quality healthcare, including RMNCH services, by providing subsidized, mobile phone-based NHIF coverage in combination with enhanced, digital training of community health volunteers and upgrading of health facilities. This study evaluated whether expanded NHIF coverage increased the accessibility and utilization of quality basic RMNCH services in areas where i-PUSH was implemented using a longitudinal cluster randomized controlled trial in Kakamega, Kenya. A total of 24 pair-matched villages were randomly assigned either to the treatment or the control group. Within each village, 10 eligible households (i.e. with a woman aged 15-49 years who was either pregnant or with a child <4 years old) were randomly selected. The study applied a difference-in-difference methodology based on a pooled cross-sectional analysis of baseline, midline and endline data, with robustness checks based on balanced panels and Analysis of Covariance methods. The analysis sample included 346 women, of whom 248 had had a live birth in the 3 years prior to any of the surveys, and 424 children aged 0-59 months. Improved NHIF coverage did not have a statistically significant impact on any of the RMNCH outcome indicators at midline nor endline. Uptake of RMNCH services, however, improved substantially in both control and treatment areas at endline compared to baseline. For instance, significant increases were observed in the number of antenatal care visits from baseline to midline (mean = 2.62-2.92, P < 0.01) and delivery with a skilled birth attendant from baseline to midline (mean = 0.91-0.97, P < 0.01). Expanded NHIF coverage, providing enhanced access to RMNCH services of unlimited duration at both public and private facilities, did not result in an increased uptake of care, in a context where access to basic public RMNCH services was already widespread. However, the positive overall trend in RMNCH utilization indicators, in a period of constrained access due to the COVID-19 pandemic, suggests that the other components of the i-PUSH programme may have been beneficial. Further research is needed to better understand how the provision of insurance, enhanced community health volunteer training and improved healthcare quality interact to ensure pregnant women and young children can make full use of the continuum of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":12926,"journal":{"name":"Health policy and planning","volume":" ","pages":"1007-1021"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142055413","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Kevin Croke, David Kapaon, Kennedy Opondo, Jan Cooper, Jacinta Nzinga, Easter Olwanda, Nicholas Rahim, Margaret E Kruk
A health systems reform known as Service Delivery Redesign (SDR) for maternal and newborn health seeks to make high-quality delivery care universal in Kakamega County, in western Kenya, by strengthening hospital-level care and making hospital deliveries the default option for pregnant women. Using a large prospective survey of new mothers in Kakamega County, we examine several key assumptions that underpin the SDR policy's theory of change. We analyse data on place of delivery, travel time and distance, out-of-pocket spending, and self-reported quality of care for 19 127 women prospectively enrolled during antenatal care (ANC) and surveyed two times after their delivery. We analyze changes in womens' delivery location preferences in recent years in Kakamega, and over the course of their most recent pregnancy. We also evaluate travel time, out-of-pocket expenditures and patient satisfaction for women who deliver in public hospitals vs primary health centres. We find substantial changes in delivery location at the population level over time and for individual women over the course of pregnancy. Facility delivery has increased from 50.4% in 2010 to 89.5% in 2019; 70% of respondents deliver at a different facility than their reported intention at ANC. Out-of-pocket delivery expenditures are on average 1351 Kenyan shillings (Ksh) in hospitals compared to 964 Ksh in PHC (primary health care)s (P < 0.01). Transport expenditures are 337 Ksh for PHC level deliveries vs 422 Ksh for hospitals (P < 0.01). Self-reported average travel time is 51 min (PHC delivery) vs 47 min (hospital delivery) (P = 0.78). The average distance to a delivery location is 15.1 km for PHC deliveries vs 15.2 km for hospitals (P = 0.99). There were no differences in overall patient-reported quality scores, while some subcomponents of quality favoured hospitals. These findings support several key assumptions of the SDR theory of change in Kakamega County, while also highlighting important challenges that should be addressed to increase the likelihood of successful implementation.
{"title":"Care seeking during pregnancy: testing the assumptions behind service delivery redesign for maternal and newborn health in rural Kenya.","authors":"Kevin Croke, David Kapaon, Kennedy Opondo, Jan Cooper, Jacinta Nzinga, Easter Olwanda, Nicholas Rahim, Margaret E Kruk","doi":"10.1093/heapol/czae088","DOIUrl":"10.1093/heapol/czae088","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A health systems reform known as Service Delivery Redesign (SDR) for maternal and newborn health seeks to make high-quality delivery care universal in Kakamega County, in western Kenya, by strengthening hospital-level care and making hospital deliveries the default option for pregnant women. Using a large prospective survey of new mothers in Kakamega County, we examine several key assumptions that underpin the SDR policy's theory of change. We analyse data on place of delivery, travel time and distance, out-of-pocket spending, and self-reported quality of care for 19 127 women prospectively enrolled during antenatal care (ANC) and surveyed two times after their delivery. We analyze changes in womens' delivery location preferences in recent years in Kakamega, and over the course of their most recent pregnancy. We also evaluate travel time, out-of-pocket expenditures and patient satisfaction for women who deliver in public hospitals vs primary health centres. We find substantial changes in delivery location at the population level over time and for individual women over the course of pregnancy. Facility delivery has increased from 50.4% in 2010 to 89.5% in 2019; 70% of respondents deliver at a different facility than their reported intention at ANC. Out-of-pocket delivery expenditures are on average 1351 Kenyan shillings (Ksh) in hospitals compared to 964 Ksh in PHC (primary health care)s (P < 0.01). Transport expenditures are 337 Ksh for PHC level deliveries vs 422 Ksh for hospitals (P < 0.01). Self-reported average travel time is 51 min (PHC delivery) vs 47 min (hospital delivery) (P = 0.78). The average distance to a delivery location is 15.1 km for PHC deliveries vs 15.2 km for hospitals (P = 0.99). There were no differences in overall patient-reported quality scores, while some subcomponents of quality favoured hospitals. These findings support several key assumptions of the SDR theory of change in Kakamega County, while also highlighting important challenges that should be addressed to increase the likelihood of successful implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":12926,"journal":{"name":"Health policy and planning","volume":" ","pages":"1099-1108"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11562111/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142285871","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Karin Diaconu, Aaron Karat, Fiammetta Bozzani, Nicky McCreesh, Jennifer Falconer, Anna Voce, Anna Vassall, Alison D Grant, Karina Kielmann
Tuberculosis infection prevention and control (TB IPC) measures are a cornerstone of policy, but measures are diverse and variably implemented. Limited attention has been paid to the health system environment, which influences successful implementation of these measures. We used qualitative system dynamics and group-model-building methods to (1) develop a qualitative causal map of the interlinked drivers of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) transmission in South African primary healthcare facilities, which in turn helped us to (2) identify plausible IPC interventions to reduce risk of transmission. Two 1-day participatory workshops were held in 2019 with policymakers and decision makers at national and provincial levels and patient advocates and health professionals at clinic and district levels. Causal loop diagrams were generated by participants and combined by investigators. The research team reviewed diagrams to identify the drivers of nosocomial transmission of Mtb in primary healthcare facilities. Interventions proposed by participants were mapped onto diagrams to identify anticipated mechanisms of action and effect. Three systemic drivers were identified: (1) Mtb nosocomial transmission is driven by bottlenecks in patient flow at given times; (2) IPC implementation and clinic processes are anchored within a staff 'culture of nominal compliance'; and (3) limited systems learning at the policy level inhibits effective clinic management and IPC implementation. Interventions prioritized by workshop participants included infrastructural, organizational and behavioural strategies that target three areas: (1) improve air quality, (2) improve use of personal protective equipment and (3) reduce the number of individuals in the clinic. In addition to core mechanisms, participants elaborated specific additional enablers who would help sustain implementation. Qualitative system dynamics modelling methods allowed us to capture stakeholder views and potential solutions to address the problem of sub-optimal TB IPC implementation. The participatory elements of system dynamics modelling facilitated problem-solving and inclusion of multiple factors frequently neglected when considering implementation.
{"title":"Qualitative system dynamics modelling to support the design and implementation of tuberculosis infection prevention and control measures in South African primary healthcare facilities.","authors":"Karin Diaconu, Aaron Karat, Fiammetta Bozzani, Nicky McCreesh, Jennifer Falconer, Anna Voce, Anna Vassall, Alison D Grant, Karina Kielmann","doi":"10.1093/heapol/czae084","DOIUrl":"10.1093/heapol/czae084","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Tuberculosis infection prevention and control (TB IPC) measures are a cornerstone of policy, but measures are diverse and variably implemented. Limited attention has been paid to the health system environment, which influences successful implementation of these measures. We used qualitative system dynamics and group-model-building methods to (1) develop a qualitative causal map of the interlinked drivers of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) transmission in South African primary healthcare facilities, which in turn helped us to (2) identify plausible IPC interventions to reduce risk of transmission. Two 1-day participatory workshops were held in 2019 with policymakers and decision makers at national and provincial levels and patient advocates and health professionals at clinic and district levels. Causal loop diagrams were generated by participants and combined by investigators. The research team reviewed diagrams to identify the drivers of nosocomial transmission of Mtb in primary healthcare facilities. Interventions proposed by participants were mapped onto diagrams to identify anticipated mechanisms of action and effect. Three systemic drivers were identified: (1) Mtb nosocomial transmission is driven by bottlenecks in patient flow at given times; (2) IPC implementation and clinic processes are anchored within a staff 'culture of nominal compliance'; and (3) limited systems learning at the policy level inhibits effective clinic management and IPC implementation. Interventions prioritized by workshop participants included infrastructural, organizational and behavioural strategies that target three areas: (1) improve air quality, (2) improve use of personal protective equipment and (3) reduce the number of individuals in the clinic. In addition to core mechanisms, participants elaborated specific additional enablers who would help sustain implementation. Qualitative system dynamics modelling methods allowed us to capture stakeholder views and potential solutions to address the problem of sub-optimal TB IPC implementation. The participatory elements of system dynamics modelling facilitated problem-solving and inclusion of multiple factors frequently neglected when considering implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":12926,"journal":{"name":"Health policy and planning","volume":" ","pages":"1041-1054"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11562122/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142106871","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
In recent decades, Nigeria has implemented a number of health financing reforms, yet progress towards Universal Health Coverage (UHC) has remained slow. In particular, the introduction of the Basic Health Care Provision Fund (BHCPF) through the National Health Act of 2014 sought to increase coverage of basic health services in Nigeria. However, recent studies have shown that health financing schemes like the BHCPF in Nigeria are suboptimal and have frequently attributed this to weak accountability and governance of the schemes. However, little is known about the accountability and governance of health financing in Nigeria, particularly from the perspective of key actors within the system. This study explores perceptions around governance and accountability through qualitative in-depth interviews with key BHCPF actors, including high-level government officers, academics and Civil Society Organizations. Thematic analysis of the findings reveals broad views among respondents that financial processes are appropriately ring-fenced, and that financial mismanagement is not the most pressing accountability gap. Importantly, respondents report that accountability processes are unclear and weak in subnational service delivery, and cite low utilization, implicit priority setting and poor quality as issues. To accelerate UHC progress, the accountability framework must be redesigned to include greater strategic participation and leadership from subnational governments.
{"title":"Stakeholder perspectives on the governance and accountability of Nigeria's Basic Health Care Provision Fund.","authors":"Mary I Adeoye, Felix A Obi, Emily R Adrion","doi":"10.1093/heapol/czae082","DOIUrl":"10.1093/heapol/czae082","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In recent decades, Nigeria has implemented a number of health financing reforms, yet progress towards Universal Health Coverage (UHC) has remained slow. In particular, the introduction of the Basic Health Care Provision Fund (BHCPF) through the National Health Act of 2014 sought to increase coverage of basic health services in Nigeria. However, recent studies have shown that health financing schemes like the BHCPF in Nigeria are suboptimal and have frequently attributed this to weak accountability and governance of the schemes. However, little is known about the accountability and governance of health financing in Nigeria, particularly from the perspective of key actors within the system. This study explores perceptions around governance and accountability through qualitative in-depth interviews with key BHCPF actors, including high-level government officers, academics and Civil Society Organizations. Thematic analysis of the findings reveals broad views among respondents that financial processes are appropriately ring-fenced, and that financial mismanagement is not the most pressing accountability gap. Importantly, respondents report that accountability processes are unclear and weak in subnational service delivery, and cite low utilization, implicit priority setting and poor quality as issues. To accelerate UHC progress, the accountability framework must be redesigned to include greater strategic participation and leadership from subnational governments.</p>","PeriodicalId":12926,"journal":{"name":"Health policy and planning","volume":" ","pages":"1032-1040"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11562125/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142055411","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Shreya S Shrikhande, Ravivarman Lakshmanasamy, Martin Röösli, Mohamed Aqiel Dalvie, Jürg Utzinger, Guéladio Cissé
There is growing evidence that climate change adversely affects human health. Multiple diseases are sensitive to climate change, including cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), which are also the leading cause of death globally. Countries such as India face a compounded challenge, with a growing burden of CVDs and a high vulnerability to climate change, requiring a co-ordinated, multi-sectoral response. In this framework synthesis, we analysed whether and how CVDs are addressed with respect to climate change in the Indian policy space. We identified 10 relevant national-level policies, which were analysed using the framework method. Our analytical framework consisted of four themes: (1) political commitment; (2) health information systems; (3) capacity building; and (4) cross-sectoral actions. Additionally, we analysed a subset of these policies and 29 state-level climate change and health action plans using content analysis to identify health priorities. Our analyses revealed a political commitment in addressing the health impacts of climate change; however, CVDs were poorly contextualized with most of the efforts focusing on vector-borne and other communicable diseases, despite their recognized burden. Heat-related illnesses and cardiopulmonary diseases were also focused on but failed to encompass the most climate-sensitive aspects. CVDs are insufficiently addressed in the existing surveillance systems, despite being mentioned in several policies and interventions, including emergency preparedness in hospitals and cross-sectoral actions. CVDs are mentioned as a separate section in only a small number of state-level plans, several of which need an impetus to complete and include CVD-specific sections. We also found several climate-health policies for specific diseases, albeit not for CVDs. This study identified important gaps in India's disease-specific climate change response and might aid policymakers in strengthening future versions of these policies and boost research and context-specific interventions on climate change and CVDs.
{"title":"A review of climate change and cardiovascular diseases in the Indian policy context.","authors":"Shreya S Shrikhande, Ravivarman Lakshmanasamy, Martin Röösli, Mohamed Aqiel Dalvie, Jürg Utzinger, Guéladio Cissé","doi":"10.1093/heapol/czae076","DOIUrl":"10.1093/heapol/czae076","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is growing evidence that climate change adversely affects human health. Multiple diseases are sensitive to climate change, including cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), which are also the leading cause of death globally. Countries such as India face a compounded challenge, with a growing burden of CVDs and a high vulnerability to climate change, requiring a co-ordinated, multi-sectoral response. In this framework synthesis, we analysed whether and how CVDs are addressed with respect to climate change in the Indian policy space. We identified 10 relevant national-level policies, which were analysed using the framework method. Our analytical framework consisted of four themes: (1) political commitment; (2) health information systems; (3) capacity building; and (4) cross-sectoral actions. Additionally, we analysed a subset of these policies and 29 state-level climate change and health action plans using content analysis to identify health priorities. Our analyses revealed a political commitment in addressing the health impacts of climate change; however, CVDs were poorly contextualized with most of the efforts focusing on vector-borne and other communicable diseases, despite their recognized burden. Heat-related illnesses and cardiopulmonary diseases were also focused on but failed to encompass the most climate-sensitive aspects. CVDs are insufficiently addressed in the existing surveillance systems, despite being mentioned in several policies and interventions, including emergency preparedness in hospitals and cross-sectoral actions. CVDs are mentioned as a separate section in only a small number of state-level plans, several of which need an impetus to complete and include CVD-specific sections. We also found several climate-health policies for specific diseases, albeit not for CVDs. This study identified important gaps in India's disease-specific climate change response and might aid policymakers in strengthening future versions of these policies and boost research and context-specific interventions on climate change and CVDs.</p>","PeriodicalId":12926,"journal":{"name":"Health policy and planning","volume":" ","pages":"1109-1124"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11562124/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142055408","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The results-based financing (RBF) programme, first implemented in Zimbabwe in 2011 and gradually expanded to other districts, aimed to address disparities in maternal health outcomes by improving the utilization of health services. This study leverages the staggered rollout of the programme as a quasi-experimental design to assess its impact on asset wealth-related inequalities in selected maternal health outcomes. The objective is to determine whether RBF can effectively reduce these disparities and promote equitable healthcare access. We employ an extended two-way fixed effects (ETWFE) model to exploit temporal variation in RBF implementation as well as individual-level variation in birth timing for identification. Utilizing pooled cross-sectional and nationally representative data from the Zimbabwe demographic and health surveys collected between 1999 and 2015, our analysis reveals significant reductions in relative and absolute maternal health inequalities, especially in the frequency and timing of prenatal care, delivery by caesarean section and family planning. Specifically, the RBF programme is associated with reductions in disparities for completing at least four or more prenatal care visits (-0.026, P < 0.01), first-trimester prenatal care (-0.033, P < 0.01), delivery by caesarean section (-0.028, P < 0.005) and family planning (-0.033, P < 0.005). Additionally, the programme is associated with improved prenatal care quality, as evidenced by progress on the prenatal care quality index (-0.040, P < 0.01). These effects are more pronounced among lower socio-economic groups in RBF districts, highlighting RBF's potential to promote equitable healthcare access. Our findings advocate for targeted policy interventions prioritizing expanding access to critical maternal health services in underserved areas and incorporating equity-focused measures within RBF frameworks to ensure inclusive and effective healthcare delivery in Zimbabwe and other low-income countries.
{"title":"Closing the gap? Results-based financing and socio-economic-related inequalities in maternal health outcomes in Zimbabwe.","authors":"Marshall Makate, Nyasha Mahonye","doi":"10.1093/heapol/czae080","DOIUrl":"10.1093/heapol/czae080","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The results-based financing (RBF) programme, first implemented in Zimbabwe in 2011 and gradually expanded to other districts, aimed to address disparities in maternal health outcomes by improving the utilization of health services. This study leverages the staggered rollout of the programme as a quasi-experimental design to assess its impact on asset wealth-related inequalities in selected maternal health outcomes. The objective is to determine whether RBF can effectively reduce these disparities and promote equitable healthcare access. We employ an extended two-way fixed effects (ETWFE) model to exploit temporal variation in RBF implementation as well as individual-level variation in birth timing for identification. Utilizing pooled cross-sectional and nationally representative data from the Zimbabwe demographic and health surveys collected between 1999 and 2015, our analysis reveals significant reductions in relative and absolute maternal health inequalities, especially in the frequency and timing of prenatal care, delivery by caesarean section and family planning. Specifically, the RBF programme is associated with reductions in disparities for completing at least four or more prenatal care visits (-0.026, P < 0.01), first-trimester prenatal care (-0.033, P < 0.01), delivery by caesarean section (-0.028, P < 0.005) and family planning (-0.033, P < 0.005). Additionally, the programme is associated with improved prenatal care quality, as evidenced by progress on the prenatal care quality index (-0.040, P < 0.01). These effects are more pronounced among lower socio-economic groups in RBF districts, highlighting RBF's potential to promote equitable healthcare access. Our findings advocate for targeted policy interventions prioritizing expanding access to critical maternal health services in underserved areas and incorporating equity-focused measures within RBF frameworks to ensure inclusive and effective healthcare delivery in Zimbabwe and other low-income countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":12926,"journal":{"name":"Health policy and planning","volume":" ","pages":"1022-1031"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11562138/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142055409","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The deployment of the health workforce, carried out through initial and subsequent posting and transfer (PT), is a key element of health workforce management. However, the focus of the currently available PT literature is mostly on subsequent PT, and the distinction between initial and subsequent PT has received little research attention. Drawing on this gap, in this paper, we examine how doctors experience their subsequent PT compared with their initial postings in two states in India. The distinctions have been drawn using the prism of six norms that we developed as evidence for implied policy in the absence of documented policy. This mixed-methods study used in-depth interviews of doctors and key informants, with job histories providing quantitative data from their accounts of their PT experience. Based on the interviews of these frontline doctors and other key policy actors, this paper brings to light key differences between initial and subsequent postings as perceived by the doctors: compared with initial postings, where the State demands to meet service needs dominated, in subsequent postings, doctors exercised greater agency in determining outcomes, with native place a central preoccupation in their choices. Our analysis provides a nuanced understanding of PT environment through this shift in doctors' perceptions of their own position and power within the system, with a significant change in the behaviour of doctors in subsequent PT compared with their initial postings. The paper brings to light the changing behaviour of doctors with subsequent PT, providing a deeper understanding of PT environment, expanding the notion of PT beyond the simple dichotomy between service needs and doctors' requests.
{"title":"Changes from initial Posting to subsequent Posting and Transfer: a frontline perspective from India.","authors":"Bhaskar Purohit, Peter S Hill","doi":"10.1093/heapol/czae085","DOIUrl":"10.1093/heapol/czae085","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The deployment of the health workforce, carried out through initial and subsequent posting and transfer (PT), is a key element of health workforce management. However, the focus of the currently available PT literature is mostly on subsequent PT, and the distinction between initial and subsequent PT has received little research attention. Drawing on this gap, in this paper, we examine how doctors experience their subsequent PT compared with their initial postings in two states in India. The distinctions have been drawn using the prism of six norms that we developed as evidence for implied policy in the absence of documented policy. This mixed-methods study used in-depth interviews of doctors and key informants, with job histories providing quantitative data from their accounts of their PT experience. Based on the interviews of these frontline doctors and other key policy actors, this paper brings to light key differences between initial and subsequent postings as perceived by the doctors: compared with initial postings, where the State demands to meet service needs dominated, in subsequent postings, doctors exercised greater agency in determining outcomes, with native place a central preoccupation in their choices. Our analysis provides a nuanced understanding of PT environment through this shift in doctors' perceptions of their own position and power within the system, with a significant change in the behaviour of doctors in subsequent PT compared with their initial postings. The paper brings to light the changing behaviour of doctors with subsequent PT, providing a deeper understanding of PT environment, expanding the notion of PT beyond the simple dichotomy between service needs and doctors' requests.</p>","PeriodicalId":12926,"journal":{"name":"Health policy and planning","volume":" ","pages":"1055-1064"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11562108/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142055412","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
In low- and-middle-income countries (LMICs), private pharmacies play a crucial role in the supply of medicines and the provision of healthcare. However, they also engage in poor practices including the improper sale of medicines and caregiving beyond their legal scope. Addressing the deficiencies of private pharmacies can increase their potential contribution towards enhancing universal health coverage. Therefore, it is important to identify the determinants of their performance. The existing literature has mostly focused on pharmacy-level factors and their regulatory environment, ignoring the market in which they operate, particularly their relationship to existing public sector provision. In this study, we fill the gap in the literature by examining the relationship between the practices of private pharmacies and resource shortages in nearby public health facilities in Odisha, India. This is possible due to three novel primary datasets with detailed information on private pharmacies and different levels of public healthcare facilities, including their geospatial coordinates. We find that when public healthcare facilities experience shortages of healthcare workers and essential medicines, private pharmacies step in to fill the gaps created by adjusting the type and amount of care provision and medicine dispensing services. Moreover, the relationship depends on their location, with public facilities and private pharmacies in rural areas performing substitutive caregiving roles, while they are complementary in urban areas. This study demonstrates how policies aimed at addressing resource shortages in public health facilities can generate dynamic responses from private pharmacies, highlighting the need for thorough scrutiny of the interaction between public healthcare facilities and private pharmacies in LMICs.
{"title":"Resource shortage in public health facilities and private pharmacy practices in Odisha, India.","authors":"Bijetri Bose, Terence C Cheng, Anuska Kalita, Annie Haakenstaad, Winnie Yip","doi":"10.1093/heapol/czae086","DOIUrl":"10.1093/heapol/czae086","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In low- and-middle-income countries (LMICs), private pharmacies play a crucial role in the supply of medicines and the provision of healthcare. However, they also engage in poor practices including the improper sale of medicines and caregiving beyond their legal scope. Addressing the deficiencies of private pharmacies can increase their potential contribution towards enhancing universal health coverage. Therefore, it is important to identify the determinants of their performance. The existing literature has mostly focused on pharmacy-level factors and their regulatory environment, ignoring the market in which they operate, particularly their relationship to existing public sector provision. In this study, we fill the gap in the literature by examining the relationship between the practices of private pharmacies and resource shortages in nearby public health facilities in Odisha, India. This is possible due to three novel primary datasets with detailed information on private pharmacies and different levels of public healthcare facilities, including their geospatial coordinates. We find that when public healthcare facilities experience shortages of healthcare workers and essential medicines, private pharmacies step in to fill the gaps created by adjusting the type and amount of care provision and medicine dispensing services. Moreover, the relationship depends on their location, with public facilities and private pharmacies in rural areas performing substitutive caregiving roles, while they are complementary in urban areas. This study demonstrates how policies aimed at addressing resource shortages in public health facilities can generate dynamic responses from private pharmacies, highlighting the need for thorough scrutiny of the interaction between public healthcare facilities and private pharmacies in LMICs.</p>","PeriodicalId":12926,"journal":{"name":"Health policy and planning","volume":" ","pages":"1074-1086"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11562114/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142139884","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}