Xinyi Liu, Chunhui Gao, Mingyue Wei, Guohong Li, Xianqun Fan
This study explores the effect of the transformation of paediatric healthcare through the implementation of the Family Mutual Aid System (FMAS) for personal medical insurance accounts among paediatric patients at a children's hospital (Hospital A in Shanghai, China). We conducted a cohort study in the endocrinology department of Hospital A from August 2021 to July 2023 to assess the impact of FMAS enrolment on patients' annual outpatient visits, annual outpatient expenditures, and the allocation of these costs among the basic medical insurance pooling fund and patients' out-of-pocket expenses, with a further subdivision into online and offline consultations. Analysis employed a weighted difference-in-differences approach within a fixed-effects model following propensity score matching. The study encompassed 10 975 paediatric patients, divided into those enrolled in FMAS (observation group) and those not (control group). Enrolment in FMAS was associated with a statistically significant increase in annual outpatient visits by an average of 1.107, predominantly attributed to an uptick in offline consultations. Additionally, there was a substantial 38.9% rise in annual outpatient costs. Detailed analysis revealed a 52.5% increase in costs covered by the medical insurance pooling fund, while patients' out-of-pocket expenses decreased by an average of 69.2%. These findings highlight the beneficial effects of FMAS enrolment on healthcare service utilization and the risk-sharing mechanisms of medical insurance.
{"title":"Impact of family mutual aid system for personal medical insurance accounts on paediatric patients' outpatient utilization patterns and costs: a difference-in-differences analysis.","authors":"Xinyi Liu, Chunhui Gao, Mingyue Wei, Guohong Li, Xianqun Fan","doi":"10.1093/heapol/czae100","DOIUrl":"10.1093/heapol/czae100","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study explores the effect of the transformation of paediatric healthcare through the implementation of the Family Mutual Aid System (FMAS) for personal medical insurance accounts among paediatric patients at a children's hospital (Hospital A in Shanghai, China). We conducted a cohort study in the endocrinology department of Hospital A from August 2021 to July 2023 to assess the impact of FMAS enrolment on patients' annual outpatient visits, annual outpatient expenditures, and the allocation of these costs among the basic medical insurance pooling fund and patients' out-of-pocket expenses, with a further subdivision into online and offline consultations. Analysis employed a weighted difference-in-differences approach within a fixed-effects model following propensity score matching. The study encompassed 10 975 paediatric patients, divided into those enrolled in FMAS (observation group) and those not (control group). Enrolment in FMAS was associated with a statistically significant increase in annual outpatient visits by an average of 1.107, predominantly attributed to an uptick in offline consultations. Additionally, there was a substantial 38.9% rise in annual outpatient costs. Detailed analysis revealed a 52.5% increase in costs covered by the medical insurance pooling fund, while patients' out-of-pocket expenses decreased by an average of 69.2%. These findings highlight the beneficial effects of FMAS enrolment on healthcare service utilization and the risk-sharing mechanisms of medical insurance.</p>","PeriodicalId":12926,"journal":{"name":"Health policy and planning","volume":" ","pages":"176-182"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11800977/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142619056","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Person-centered long-term care systems, integral to healthy ageing, should empower older people to achieve ageing in place. Yet evidence on the impact of the design of long-term care systems on older people's choice of place of ageing, especially that from developing countries, is limited. Taking the introduction of Long-Term Care Insurance (LTCI) in City X of China as a policy shock, we examined the impact of becoming eligible for LTCI on program beneficiaries' choice of place of ageing-institution or home-before they started to receive any actual benefit. Based on our analysis of the administrative data of all LTCI applicants between July 2017 and September 2020 from City X, we found that becoming eligible for LTCI increased an older-person's probability of choosing home as her place of ageing even before she received any benefit by ∼16%, and this positive impact was larger for those insured, of higher education level, or of higher disability grade. By bringing more ageing in place, LTCI in City X promoted healthy ageing. Our study suggests that the specifics of the LTCI program, such as who could receive subsidies, family values, and family members' engagement in the labor market, could all work together to shape the substitution pattern between home and institutional care.
以人为本的长期护理体系是健康老龄化不可或缺的组成部分,应增强老年人实现就地养老的能力。然而,有关长期护理制度的设计对老年人选择就地养老的影响的证据却很有限,尤其是来自发展中国家的证据。以中国 X 市引入长期护理保险(LTCI)为政策冲击,我们研究了在开始领取任何实际福利之前,符合长期护理保险资格对项目受益人选择养老场所(机构或居家)的影响。根据我们对 X 市 2017 年 7 月至 2020 年 9 月期间所有长护险申请者的行政数据分析,我们发现,在获得长护险资格之前,老年人选择居家养老的概率就已经增加了约 16 个百分点,而这一积极影响对于教育程度较高或残疾等级较高的参保者而言更大。X 市的长期护理保险带来了更多的居家养老,促进了健康老龄化。我们的研究表明,长期护理保险计划的具体细节,如谁可以获得补贴、家庭价值观、家庭成员在劳动力市场的参与度等,都可以共同塑造居家护理和机构护理之间的替代模式。
{"title":"Becoming eligible for long-term care insurance in China brought more ageing at home: evidence from a pilot city.","authors":"Zeyuan Chen, Hui Zhou, Xiang Ma","doi":"10.1093/heapol/czae109","DOIUrl":"10.1093/heapol/czae109","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Person-centered long-term care systems, integral to healthy ageing, should empower older people to achieve ageing in place. Yet evidence on the impact of the design of long-term care systems on older people's choice of place of ageing, especially that from developing countries, is limited. Taking the introduction of Long-Term Care Insurance (LTCI) in City X of China as a policy shock, we examined the impact of becoming eligible for LTCI on program beneficiaries' choice of place of ageing-institution or home-before they started to receive any actual benefit. Based on our analysis of the administrative data of all LTCI applicants between July 2017 and September 2020 from City X, we found that becoming eligible for LTCI increased an older-person's probability of choosing home as her place of ageing even before she received any benefit by ∼16%, and this positive impact was larger for those insured, of higher education level, or of higher disability grade. By bringing more ageing in place, LTCI in City X promoted healthy ageing. Our study suggests that the specifics of the LTCI program, such as who could receive subsidies, family values, and family members' engagement in the labor market, could all work together to shape the substitution pattern between home and institutional care.</p>","PeriodicalId":12926,"journal":{"name":"Health policy and planning","volume":" ","pages":"165-175"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142619054","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This article explores the ideologies, interests, and institutions affecting health policymaking in Nigeria, and the role of the private sector therein. It covers the period from the late-1950s, the years leading up to independence, to 2014, when the country enacted its first-ever law to govern its healthcare system. The National Health Act (NHAct) was adopted after a decade of preparation and civil society-driven advocacy, making the objective of Universal Health Coverage (UHC) explicit. However, in its final version, the NHAct earmarked only a small share of public funds for UHC, solidifying the country's reliance on private healthcare and out-of-pocket payments. To examine the specific set of ideologies, interests, and institutions defining Nigeria's pathway toward UHC and the contribution of the private sector, we adopted Rizvi and colleagues' political economy framework, situating the genesis of the 2014 NHAct within the broader political and economic context of Nigeria's health system reform process since the 1950s. Drawing on qualitative data collected during interviews and focus groups, we found that the deep entrenchment of private-sector healthcare in Nigeria is the result of a path-dependent process. This implies that Nigeria's current reliance on the private sector is influenced by historical patterns, competing interests, and institutional practices that have reinforced the role of private actors over time. We identified three major explanatory factors that have shaped health policymaking in Nigeria. First, since the 1980s, the ideology that private healthcare is the solution to an underfunded and underperforming public healthcare system has been reinforced by leading international organisations. Second, private actors in Nigeria have been in a strong position to influence health policymaking since independence. Third, Nigeria's challenging socioeconomic context and the limitations of its federal governance structure have fostered a general level of public distrust in the capacity of the public sector to provide quality healthcare.
{"title":"A Political Economy Analysis of Health Policymaking in Nigeria: The Genesis of the 2014 National Health Act.","authors":"Julia Ngozi Chukwuma, Felix Abrahams Obi","doi":"10.1093/heapol/czaf007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czaf007","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article explores the ideologies, interests, and institutions affecting health policymaking in Nigeria, and the role of the private sector therein. It covers the period from the late-1950s, the years leading up to independence, to 2014, when the country enacted its first-ever law to govern its healthcare system. The National Health Act (NHAct) was adopted after a decade of preparation and civil society-driven advocacy, making the objective of Universal Health Coverage (UHC) explicit. However, in its final version, the NHAct earmarked only a small share of public funds for UHC, solidifying the country's reliance on private healthcare and out-of-pocket payments. To examine the specific set of ideologies, interests, and institutions defining Nigeria's pathway toward UHC and the contribution of the private sector, we adopted Rizvi and colleagues' political economy framework, situating the genesis of the 2014 NHAct within the broader political and economic context of Nigeria's health system reform process since the 1950s. Drawing on qualitative data collected during interviews and focus groups, we found that the deep entrenchment of private-sector healthcare in Nigeria is the result of a path-dependent process. This implies that Nigeria's current reliance on the private sector is influenced by historical patterns, competing interests, and institutional practices that have reinforced the role of private actors over time. We identified three major explanatory factors that have shaped health policymaking in Nigeria. First, since the 1980s, the ideology that private healthcare is the solution to an underfunded and underperforming public healthcare system has been reinforced by leading international organisations. Second, private actors in Nigeria have been in a strong position to influence health policymaking since independence. Third, Nigeria's challenging socioeconomic context and the limitations of its federal governance structure have fostered a general level of public distrust in the capacity of the public sector to provide quality healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":12926,"journal":{"name":"Health policy and planning","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143065278","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Janelle M Wagnild, Samuel Asiedu Owusu, Simon Mariwah, Victor I Kolo, Ahmed Vandi, Didacus Bambaiha Namanya, Rutendo Kuwana, Babatunde Jayeola, Vigil Prah-Ashun, Moji Christianah Adeyeye, James Komeh, David Nahamya, Kate Hampshire
Substandard and falsified (SF) medical products are a serious health and economic concern that disproportionately impact low- and middle-income countries and marginalized groups. Public education campaigns are demand-side interventions that may reduce risk of SF exposure, but the effectiveness of such campaigns, and their likelihood of benefitting everybody, is unclear. Nationwide pilot risk communication campaigns, involving multiple media, were deployed in Ghana, Nigeria, Sierra Leone, Uganda in 2020-2021. Focus group discussions (n=73 FGDs with n=611 total participants) and key informant interviews (n=80 individual interviews and n=4 group interviews with n=111 total informants) were conducted within each of the four countries to ascertain the reach and effectiveness of the campaign. Small proportions of focus group discussants (8.0%-13.9%) and key informants (12.5%-31.4%) had previously encountered the campaign materials. Understandability was varied: the use of English and select local languages, combined with high rates of illiteracy, meant that some were not able to understand the campaign. The capacity for people to act on the messages was extremely limited: inaccessibility, unavailability, and unaffordability of quality-assured medicines from official sources, as well as illiteracy, constrained what people could realistically do in response to the campaign. Importantly, reach, understandability, and capacity to respond were especially limited amongst marginalized groups, who are already at greatest risk of exposure to SF products. These findings suggest that there may be potential for public education campaigns to help combat the issue of SF medicines through prevention, but that the impact of public education is likely to be limited and may even inadvertently widen health inequities. This indicates that public education campaigns are not a single solution; they can only be properly effective if accompanied by health system strengthening and supply-side interventions that aim to increase the effectiveness of regulation.
{"title":"Can public education campaigns equitably counter the use of substandard and falsified (SF) medical products in African countries?","authors":"Janelle M Wagnild, Samuel Asiedu Owusu, Simon Mariwah, Victor I Kolo, Ahmed Vandi, Didacus Bambaiha Namanya, Rutendo Kuwana, Babatunde Jayeola, Vigil Prah-Ashun, Moji Christianah Adeyeye, James Komeh, David Nahamya, Kate Hampshire","doi":"10.1093/heapol/czaf004","DOIUrl":"10.1093/heapol/czaf004","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Substandard and falsified (SF) medical products are a serious health and economic concern that disproportionately impact low- and middle-income countries and marginalized groups. Public education campaigns are demand-side interventions that may reduce risk of SF exposure, but the effectiveness of such campaigns, and their likelihood of benefitting everybody, is unclear. Nationwide pilot risk communication campaigns, involving multiple media, were deployed in Ghana, Nigeria, Sierra Leone, Uganda in 2020-2021. Focus group discussions (n=73 FGDs with n=611 total participants) and key informant interviews (n=80 individual interviews and n=4 group interviews with n=111 total informants) were conducted within each of the four countries to ascertain the reach and effectiveness of the campaign. Small proportions of focus group discussants (8.0%-13.9%) and key informants (12.5%-31.4%) had previously encountered the campaign materials. Understandability was varied: the use of English and select local languages, combined with high rates of illiteracy, meant that some were not able to understand the campaign. The capacity for people to act on the messages was extremely limited: inaccessibility, unavailability, and unaffordability of quality-assured medicines from official sources, as well as illiteracy, constrained what people could realistically do in response to the campaign. Importantly, reach, understandability, and capacity to respond were especially limited amongst marginalized groups, who are already at greatest risk of exposure to SF products. These findings suggest that there may be potential for public education campaigns to help combat the issue of SF medicines through prevention, but that the impact of public education is likely to be limited and may even inadvertently widen health inequities. This indicates that public education campaigns are not a single solution; they can only be properly effective if accompanied by health system strengthening and supply-side interventions that aim to increase the effectiveness of regulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":12926,"journal":{"name":"Health policy and planning","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143004483","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Katherine Snyman, Catherine Pitt, Angelo Aturia, Joyce Aber, Samuel Gonahasa, Jane Frances Namuganga, Joaniter Nankabirwa, Emmanuel Arinaitwe, Catherine Maiteki-Sebuguzi, Henry Katamba, Jimmy Opigo, Fred Matovu, Grant Dorsey, Moses R Kamya, Walter Ochieng, Sarah G Staedke
Case management of malaria in Africa has evolved markedly over the past 20 years and updated cost estimates are needed to guide malaria control policies. We estimated the cost of malaria illness to households and the public health service and assessed the equity of these costs in Uganda. From December 2021 to May 2022, we conducted a costing exercise in eight government-run health centres covering seven sub-regions, collecting health service costs from patient observations, records review and a time-and-motion study. From November 2021 to January 2022, we gathered data on households' cost of illness from randomly selected households for 614 residents with suspected malaria. Societal costs of illness were estimated and combined with secondary data sources to estimate the total economic burden of malaria in Uganda. We used regression analyses and concentration curves to assess the equity of household costs across age, geographic location and socio-economic status. The mean societal economic cost of treating suspected malaria was $15.12 [95% confidence interval (CI): 12.83-17.14] per outpatient and $27.21 (95% CI: 20.43-33.99) per inpatient case. Households incurred 81% of outpatient and 72% of inpatient costs. Households bore nearly equal costs of illness, regardless of socio-economic status. A case of malaria cost households in the lowest quintile 26% of per capita monthly consumption, while a malaria case only cost households in the highest quintile 8%. We estimated the societal cost of malaria treatment in Uganda was $577 million (range: $302 million-1.09 billion) in 2021. The cost of malaria remains high in Uganda. Households bear the major burden of these costs. Poorer and richer households incur the same costs per case; this distribution is equal, but not equitable. These results can be applied to parameterize future economic evaluations of malaria control interventions and to evaluate the impact of malaria on Ugandan society, informing resource allocations in malaria prevention.
{"title":"Who pays to treat malaria and how much? Analysis of the cost of illness, equity and economic burden of malaria in Uganda.","authors":"Katherine Snyman, Catherine Pitt, Angelo Aturia, Joyce Aber, Samuel Gonahasa, Jane Frances Namuganga, Joaniter Nankabirwa, Emmanuel Arinaitwe, Catherine Maiteki-Sebuguzi, Henry Katamba, Jimmy Opigo, Fred Matovu, Grant Dorsey, Moses R Kamya, Walter Ochieng, Sarah G Staedke","doi":"10.1093/heapol/czae093","DOIUrl":"10.1093/heapol/czae093","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Case management of malaria in Africa has evolved markedly over the past 20 years and updated cost estimates are needed to guide malaria control policies. We estimated the cost of malaria illness to households and the public health service and assessed the equity of these costs in Uganda. From December 2021 to May 2022, we conducted a costing exercise in eight government-run health centres covering seven sub-regions, collecting health service costs from patient observations, records review and a time-and-motion study. From November 2021 to January 2022, we gathered data on households' cost of illness from randomly selected households for 614 residents with suspected malaria. Societal costs of illness were estimated and combined with secondary data sources to estimate the total economic burden of malaria in Uganda. We used regression analyses and concentration curves to assess the equity of household costs across age, geographic location and socio-economic status. The mean societal economic cost of treating suspected malaria was $15.12 [95% confidence interval (CI): 12.83-17.14] per outpatient and $27.21 (95% CI: 20.43-33.99) per inpatient case. Households incurred 81% of outpatient and 72% of inpatient costs. Households bore nearly equal costs of illness, regardless of socio-economic status. A case of malaria cost households in the lowest quintile 26% of per capita monthly consumption, while a malaria case only cost households in the highest quintile 8%. We estimated the societal cost of malaria treatment in Uganda was $577 million (range: $302 million-1.09 billion) in 2021. The cost of malaria remains high in Uganda. Households bear the major burden of these costs. Poorer and richer households incur the same costs per case; this distribution is equal, but not equitable. These results can be applied to parameterize future economic evaluations of malaria control interventions and to evaluate the impact of malaria on Ugandan society, informing resource allocations in malaria prevention.</p>","PeriodicalId":12926,"journal":{"name":"Health policy and planning","volume":" ","pages":"52-65"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11724642/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142463914","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Correction to: Improving antibiotic use through behaviour change: a systematic review of interventions evaluated in low- and middle-income countries.","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/heapol/czae107","DOIUrl":"10.1093/heapol/czae107","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12926,"journal":{"name":"Health policy and planning","volume":" ","pages":"121-122"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11724634/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142686819","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Doris Osei Afriyie, Regina Titi-Ofei, Felix Masiye, Collins Chansa, Günther Fink
Governments in low and middle-income countries (LMICs) are increasingly considering the introduction of national health insurance scheme (NHIS) as a strategy to achieve universal health coverage (UHC) targets. The literature has widely documented the technical challenges associated with implementing UHC policies in LMICs but much less is known about the political process necessary to pass UHC legislation. In this article, we document the political economy issues surrounding the establishment of the Zambia NHIS in 2018. We adapted a political economy framework incorporating, semi-structured interviews with diverse stakeholders and document analysis of policies, operational reports and legislatures from 1991 and 2018. Our findings show the 26-year journey towards the establishment of the NHIS in Zambia involved a long sequence of policy dialogue, technical review and stakeholder engagement. Our interviews with key stakeholders suggest that the act was eventually passed due to strong political will and dominant leadership of the Ministry of Health. Passing the law required trade-offs between choices influenced by stakeholder pressures and recommendations from research and actuarial studies. Another equally critical factor was the high public support and legacies of past policies, such as the removal of user fees that had created quality gaps and inequities in the health system. Furthermore, global ideas about UHC and initiatives implemented by other countries also generated support for Zambia's NHIS. Overall, this study highlights the complex set of political economy factors that need to align in order for governments to be able to adopt health insurance in low-income settings. We show that political leadership and commitment to getting reforms passed is crucial. We also highlight how certain narratives about countries in the global health sphere can shape policies in other countries.
{"title":"The political economy of national health insurance schemes: evidence from Zambia.","authors":"Doris Osei Afriyie, Regina Titi-Ofei, Felix Masiye, Collins Chansa, Günther Fink","doi":"10.1093/heapol/czae094","DOIUrl":"10.1093/heapol/czae094","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Governments in low and middle-income countries (LMICs) are increasingly considering the introduction of national health insurance scheme (NHIS) as a strategy to achieve universal health coverage (UHC) targets. The literature has widely documented the technical challenges associated with implementing UHC policies in LMICs but much less is known about the political process necessary to pass UHC legislation. In this article, we document the political economy issues surrounding the establishment of the Zambia NHIS in 2018. We adapted a political economy framework incorporating, semi-structured interviews with diverse stakeholders and document analysis of policies, operational reports and legislatures from 1991 and 2018. Our findings show the 26-year journey towards the establishment of the NHIS in Zambia involved a long sequence of policy dialogue, technical review and stakeholder engagement. Our interviews with key stakeholders suggest that the act was eventually passed due to strong political will and dominant leadership of the Ministry of Health. Passing the law required trade-offs between choices influenced by stakeholder pressures and recommendations from research and actuarial studies. Another equally critical factor was the high public support and legacies of past policies, such as the removal of user fees that had created quality gaps and inequities in the health system. Furthermore, global ideas about UHC and initiatives implemented by other countries also generated support for Zambia's NHIS. Overall, this study highlights the complex set of political economy factors that need to align in order for governments to be able to adopt health insurance in low-income settings. We show that political leadership and commitment to getting reforms passed is crucial. We also highlight how certain narratives about countries in the global health sphere can shape policies in other countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":12926,"journal":{"name":"Health policy and planning","volume":" ","pages":"66-74"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11725516/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142463913","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Magoba Bridget, Gebrekrstos Negash Gebru, George S Odongo, Calle Hedberg, Adel Hussein Elduma, Joseph Sam Kanu, James Bangura, James Sylvester Squire, Monique A Foster
The Integrated Disease Surveillance and Response (IDSR) system was adopted by the Sierra Leone Ministry of Health (MOH) in 2008, which was based on paper-based tools for health data recording and reporting from health facilities to the national level. The Sierra Leone MoH introduced the implementation of electronic case-based disease surveillance reporting of immediately notifiable diseases. This study aims to document and describe the experience of Sierra Leone in transforming her paper-based disease surveillance system into an electronic disease surveillance system. Retrospective mixed methods of qualitative and quantitative data were reviewed. Qualitative data were collected by reviewing surveillance technical reports, epidemiological bulletins, COVID-19, IDSR technical guidelines, Digital Health strategy and DHIS2 documentation. Content and thematic data analyses were performed for the qualitative data, while Microsoft Excel and DHIS2 platform were used for the quantitative data analysis to document the experience of Sierra Leone in digitalizing its disease surveillance system. In the early 2017, a web-based electronic Case-Based Disease Surveillance (eCBDS) for real-time reporting of immediately notifiable diseases and health threats was piloted using the District Health Information System 2 (DHIS2) software. The eCBDS integrates case profile, laboratory, and final outcome data. All captured data and information are immediately accessible to users with the required credentials. The system can be accessed via a browser or an Android DHIS2 application. By 2021, there was a significant increase in the proportion of immediately notifiable cases reported through the facility-level electronic platform, and more than 80% of the cases reported through the weekly surveillance platform had case-based data in eCBDS. Case-based data from the platform are analysed and disseminated to stakeholders for public health decision-making. Several outbreaks of Lassa fever, Measles, vaccine-derived Polio and Anthrax have been tracked in real-time through the eCBDS.
{"title":"Digitalizing disease surveillance: experience from Sierra Leone.","authors":"Magoba Bridget, Gebrekrstos Negash Gebru, George S Odongo, Calle Hedberg, Adel Hussein Elduma, Joseph Sam Kanu, James Bangura, James Sylvester Squire, Monique A Foster","doi":"10.1093/heapol/czae039","DOIUrl":"10.1093/heapol/czae039","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Integrated Disease Surveillance and Response (IDSR) system was adopted by the Sierra Leone Ministry of Health (MOH) in 2008, which was based on paper-based tools for health data recording and reporting from health facilities to the national level. The Sierra Leone MoH introduced the implementation of electronic case-based disease surveillance reporting of immediately notifiable diseases. This study aims to document and describe the experience of Sierra Leone in transforming her paper-based disease surveillance system into an electronic disease surveillance system. Retrospective mixed methods of qualitative and quantitative data were reviewed. Qualitative data were collected by reviewing surveillance technical reports, epidemiological bulletins, COVID-19, IDSR technical guidelines, Digital Health strategy and DHIS2 documentation. Content and thematic data analyses were performed for the qualitative data, while Microsoft Excel and DHIS2 platform were used for the quantitative data analysis to document the experience of Sierra Leone in digitalizing its disease surveillance system. In the early 2017, a web-based electronic Case-Based Disease Surveillance (eCBDS) for real-time reporting of immediately notifiable diseases and health threats was piloted using the District Health Information System 2 (DHIS2) software. The eCBDS integrates case profile, laboratory, and final outcome data. All captured data and information are immediately accessible to users with the required credentials. The system can be accessed via a browser or an Android DHIS2 application. By 2021, there was a significant increase in the proportion of immediately notifiable cases reported through the facility-level electronic platform, and more than 80% of the cases reported through the weekly surveillance platform had case-based data in eCBDS. Case-based data from the platform are analysed and disseminated to stakeholders for public health decision-making. Several outbreaks of Lassa fever, Measles, vaccine-derived Polio and Anthrax have been tracked in real-time through the eCBDS.</p>","PeriodicalId":12926,"journal":{"name":"Health policy and planning","volume":" ","pages":"85-96"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11724635/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141174855","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jasper Nidoi, Justin Pulford, Tom Wingfield, Thomson Rachael, Beate Ringwald, Winceslaus Katagira, Winters Muttamba, Milly Nattimba, Zahra Namuli, Bruce Kirenga
Gender impacts exposure and vulnerability to tuberculosis (TB) evidenced by a higher prevalence of both TB disease and missed TB diagnoses among men, who significantly contribute to new TB infections. We present the formative research phase of a study, which used participatory methods to identify gender-specific interventions for systematic screening of TB among men in Uganda. Health facility-level data were collected at four Ugandan general hospitals (Kawolo, Gombe, Mityana and Nakaseke) among 70 TB stakeholders, including healthcare workers, TB survivors, policymakers and researchers. Using health-seeking pathways, they delineated and compared men's ideal and actual step-by-step TB health-seeking processes to identify barriers to TB care. The stepping stones method, depicting barriers as a 'river' and each 'steppingstone' as a solution, was employed to identify interventions which would help link men with TB symptoms to care. These insights were then synthesized in a co-analysis meeting with 17 participants, including representatives from each health facility to develop a consensus on proposed interventions. Data across locations revealed the actual TB care pathway diverted from the ideal pathway due to health system, community, health worker and individual-level barriers such as delayed health seeking, unfavourable facility operating hours and long waiting times that conflicted with men's work schedules. Stakeholders proposed to address these barriers through the introduction of male-specific services; integrated TB services that prioritize X-ray screening for men with cough; healthcare worker training modules on integrated male-friendly services; training and supporting TB champions to deliver health education to people seeking care; and engagement of private practitioners to screen for TB. In conclusion, our participatory co-design approach facilitated dialogue, learning and consensus between different health actors on context-specific, person-centred TB interventions for men in Uganda. The acceptability, effectiveness and cost effectiveness of the package will now be evaluated in a pilot study.
{"title":"Finding the missing men with tuberculosis: a participatory approach to identify priority interventions in Uganda.","authors":"Jasper Nidoi, Justin Pulford, Tom Wingfield, Thomson Rachael, Beate Ringwald, Winceslaus Katagira, Winters Muttamba, Milly Nattimba, Zahra Namuli, Bruce Kirenga","doi":"10.1093/heapol/czae087","DOIUrl":"10.1093/heapol/czae087","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Gender impacts exposure and vulnerability to tuberculosis (TB) evidenced by a higher prevalence of both TB disease and missed TB diagnoses among men, who significantly contribute to new TB infections. We present the formative research phase of a study, which used participatory methods to identify gender-specific interventions for systematic screening of TB among men in Uganda. Health facility-level data were collected at four Ugandan general hospitals (Kawolo, Gombe, Mityana and Nakaseke) among 70 TB stakeholders, including healthcare workers, TB survivors, policymakers and researchers. Using health-seeking pathways, they delineated and compared men's ideal and actual step-by-step TB health-seeking processes to identify barriers to TB care. The stepping stones method, depicting barriers as a 'river' and each 'steppingstone' as a solution, was employed to identify interventions which would help link men with TB symptoms to care. These insights were then synthesized in a co-analysis meeting with 17 participants, including representatives from each health facility to develop a consensus on proposed interventions. Data across locations revealed the actual TB care pathway diverted from the ideal pathway due to health system, community, health worker and individual-level barriers such as delayed health seeking, unfavourable facility operating hours and long waiting times that conflicted with men's work schedules. Stakeholders proposed to address these barriers through the introduction of male-specific services; integrated TB services that prioritize X-ray screening for men with cough; healthcare worker training modules on integrated male-friendly services; training and supporting TB champions to deliver health education to people seeking care; and engagement of private practitioners to screen for TB. In conclusion, our participatory co-design approach facilitated dialogue, learning and consensus between different health actors on context-specific, person-centred TB interventions for men in Uganda. The acceptability, effectiveness and cost effectiveness of the package will now be evaluated in a pilot study.</p>","PeriodicalId":12926,"journal":{"name":"Health policy and planning","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11724639/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142106870","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Marsha Orgill, Bruno Marchal, Bronwyn Harris, Lucy Gilson
The need for leadership within district health systems is critical for the effective delivery of services and for inter-sectoral collaboration for health. Leadership capacity development (LCD) has not, however, been prioritized within health systems, and the systemic capacity (i.e. roles, structures and processes) that is needed to develop managers who can lead is not always in place. This paper aims to contribute to understanding how to build such capacity, considering a relevant bottom-up innovation. We observed, in the period 2013-15, the emergent implementation of this innovation (a 'Leadership Commission') in a South African health district. What started out as an effort to train individual leaders evolved into the development of systemic capacity for LCD. We adopted realist evaluation as the main methodological approach, as well as case study design, and we first developed a programme theory of the internally driven LCD initiative, through a round of interviews with senior managers. We then tested the programme theory drawing on 14 in-depth interviews and field notes of meetings and processes. Our analysis suggests that building systemic capacity for LCD requires leadership to be expressed as a strategic priority by those with positional authority and that bottom-up LCD requires institutional commitment through strengthening routine structures or creating new ones. The ability to leverage existing resources is another key element of systemic capacity. The mechanisms that enable bottom-up capacity development include tacit and experiential knowledge, sensemaking, systems thinking and trust between, and motivation of, those tasked with leading LCD. Leadership development is constrained by increased workloads for those involved as the prioritization of leadership becomes simply an additional task, and sustainability challenges are likely in the absence of additional resources for bottom-up innovation.
{"title":"Initiating systemic capacity development for leadership from the bottom-up: a realist evaluation of a leadership innovation in a South African health district.","authors":"Marsha Orgill, Bruno Marchal, Bronwyn Harris, Lucy Gilson","doi":"10.1093/heapol/czae099","DOIUrl":"10.1093/heapol/czae099","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The need for leadership within district health systems is critical for the effective delivery of services and for inter-sectoral collaboration for health. Leadership capacity development (LCD) has not, however, been prioritized within health systems, and the systemic capacity (i.e. roles, structures and processes) that is needed to develop managers who can lead is not always in place. This paper aims to contribute to understanding how to build such capacity, considering a relevant bottom-up innovation. We observed, in the period 2013-15, the emergent implementation of this innovation (a 'Leadership Commission') in a South African health district. What started out as an effort to train individual leaders evolved into the development of systemic capacity for LCD. We adopted realist evaluation as the main methodological approach, as well as case study design, and we first developed a programme theory of the internally driven LCD initiative, through a round of interviews with senior managers. We then tested the programme theory drawing on 14 in-depth interviews and field notes of meetings and processes. Our analysis suggests that building systemic capacity for LCD requires leadership to be expressed as a strategic priority by those with positional authority and that bottom-up LCD requires institutional commitment through strengthening routine structures or creating new ones. The ability to leverage existing resources is another key element of systemic capacity. The mechanisms that enable bottom-up capacity development include tacit and experiential knowledge, sensemaking, systems thinking and trust between, and motivation of, those tasked with leading LCD. Leadership development is constrained by increased workloads for those involved as the prioritization of leadership becomes simply an additional task, and sustainability challenges are likely in the absence of additional resources for bottom-up innovation.</p>","PeriodicalId":12926,"journal":{"name":"Health policy and planning","volume":" ","pages":"31-41"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11724640/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142545065","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}