Karin Diaconu, Aaron Karat, Fiammetta Bozzani, Nicky McCreesh, Jennifer Falconer, Anna Voce, Anna Vassall, Alison D Grant, Karina Kielmann
Tuberculosis infection prevention and control (TB IPC) measures are a cornerstone of policy, but measures are diverse and variably implemented. Limited attention has been paid to the health system environment, which influences successful implementation of these measures. We used qualitative system dynamics and group-model-building methods to (1) develop a qualitative causal map of the interlinked drivers of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) transmission in South African primary healthcare facilities, which in turn helped us to (2) identify plausible IPC interventions to reduce risk of transmission. Two 1-day participatory workshops were held in 2019 with policymakers and decision makers at national and provincial levels and patient advocates and health professionals at clinic and district levels. Causal loop diagrams were generated by participants and combined by investigators. The research team reviewed diagrams to identify the drivers of nosocomial transmission of Mtb in primary healthcare facilities. Interventions proposed by participants were mapped onto diagrams to identify anticipated mechanisms of action and effect. Three systemic drivers were identified: (1) Mtb nosocomial transmission is driven by bottlenecks in patient flow at given times; (2) IPC implementation and clinic processes are anchored within a staff 'culture of nominal compliance'; and (3) limited systems learning at the policy level inhibits effective clinic management and IPC implementation. Interventions prioritized by workshop participants included infrastructural, organizational and behavioural strategies that target three areas: (1) improve air quality, (2) improve use of personal protective equipment and (3) reduce the number of individuals in the clinic. In addition to core mechanisms, participants elaborated specific additional enablers who would help sustain implementation. Qualitative system dynamics modelling methods allowed us to capture stakeholder views and potential solutions to address the problem of sub-optimal TB IPC implementation. The participatory elements of system dynamics modelling facilitated problem-solving and inclusion of multiple factors frequently neglected when considering implementation.
{"title":"Qualitative system dynamics modelling to support the design and implementation of tuberculosis infection prevention and control measures in South African primary healthcare facilities.","authors":"Karin Diaconu, Aaron Karat, Fiammetta Bozzani, Nicky McCreesh, Jennifer Falconer, Anna Voce, Anna Vassall, Alison D Grant, Karina Kielmann","doi":"10.1093/heapol/czae084","DOIUrl":"10.1093/heapol/czae084","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Tuberculosis infection prevention and control (TB IPC) measures are a cornerstone of policy, but measures are diverse and variably implemented. Limited attention has been paid to the health system environment, which influences successful implementation of these measures. We used qualitative system dynamics and group-model-building methods to (1) develop a qualitative causal map of the interlinked drivers of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) transmission in South African primary healthcare facilities, which in turn helped us to (2) identify plausible IPC interventions to reduce risk of transmission. Two 1-day participatory workshops were held in 2019 with policymakers and decision makers at national and provincial levels and patient advocates and health professionals at clinic and district levels. Causal loop diagrams were generated by participants and combined by investigators. The research team reviewed diagrams to identify the drivers of nosocomial transmission of Mtb in primary healthcare facilities. Interventions proposed by participants were mapped onto diagrams to identify anticipated mechanisms of action and effect. Three systemic drivers were identified: (1) Mtb nosocomial transmission is driven by bottlenecks in patient flow at given times; (2) IPC implementation and clinic processes are anchored within a staff 'culture of nominal compliance'; and (3) limited systems learning at the policy level inhibits effective clinic management and IPC implementation. Interventions prioritized by workshop participants included infrastructural, organizational and behavioural strategies that target three areas: (1) improve air quality, (2) improve use of personal protective equipment and (3) reduce the number of individuals in the clinic. In addition to core mechanisms, participants elaborated specific additional enablers who would help sustain implementation. Qualitative system dynamics modelling methods allowed us to capture stakeholder views and potential solutions to address the problem of sub-optimal TB IPC implementation. The participatory elements of system dynamics modelling facilitated problem-solving and inclusion of multiple factors frequently neglected when considering implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":12926,"journal":{"name":"Health policy and planning","volume":" ","pages":"1041-1054"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11562122/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142106871","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
In recent decades, Nigeria has implemented a number of health financing reforms, yet progress towards Universal Health Coverage (UHC) has remained slow. In particular, the introduction of the Basic Health Care Provision Fund (BHCPF) through the National Health Act of 2014 sought to increase coverage of basic health services in Nigeria. However, recent studies have shown that health financing schemes like the BHCPF in Nigeria are suboptimal and have frequently attributed this to weak accountability and governance of the schemes. However, little is known about the accountability and governance of health financing in Nigeria, particularly from the perspective of key actors within the system. This study explores perceptions around governance and accountability through qualitative in-depth interviews with key BHCPF actors, including high-level government officers, academics and Civil Society Organizations. Thematic analysis of the findings reveals broad views among respondents that financial processes are appropriately ring-fenced, and that financial mismanagement is not the most pressing accountability gap. Importantly, respondents report that accountability processes are unclear and weak in subnational service delivery, and cite low utilization, implicit priority setting and poor quality as issues. To accelerate UHC progress, the accountability framework must be redesigned to include greater strategic participation and leadership from subnational governments.
{"title":"Stakeholder perspectives on the governance and accountability of Nigeria's Basic Health Care Provision Fund.","authors":"Mary I Adeoye, Felix A Obi, Emily R Adrion","doi":"10.1093/heapol/czae082","DOIUrl":"10.1093/heapol/czae082","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In recent decades, Nigeria has implemented a number of health financing reforms, yet progress towards Universal Health Coverage (UHC) has remained slow. In particular, the introduction of the Basic Health Care Provision Fund (BHCPF) through the National Health Act of 2014 sought to increase coverage of basic health services in Nigeria. However, recent studies have shown that health financing schemes like the BHCPF in Nigeria are suboptimal and have frequently attributed this to weak accountability and governance of the schemes. However, little is known about the accountability and governance of health financing in Nigeria, particularly from the perspective of key actors within the system. This study explores perceptions around governance and accountability through qualitative in-depth interviews with key BHCPF actors, including high-level government officers, academics and Civil Society Organizations. Thematic analysis of the findings reveals broad views among respondents that financial processes are appropriately ring-fenced, and that financial mismanagement is not the most pressing accountability gap. Importantly, respondents report that accountability processes are unclear and weak in subnational service delivery, and cite low utilization, implicit priority setting and poor quality as issues. To accelerate UHC progress, the accountability framework must be redesigned to include greater strategic participation and leadership from subnational governments.</p>","PeriodicalId":12926,"journal":{"name":"Health policy and planning","volume":" ","pages":"1032-1040"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11562125/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142055411","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Shreya S Shrikhande, Ravivarman Lakshmanasamy, Martin Röösli, Mohamed Aqiel Dalvie, Jürg Utzinger, Guéladio Cissé
There is growing evidence that climate change adversely affects human health. Multiple diseases are sensitive to climate change, including cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), which are also the leading cause of death globally. Countries such as India face a compounded challenge, with a growing burden of CVDs and a high vulnerability to climate change, requiring a co-ordinated, multi-sectoral response. In this framework synthesis, we analysed whether and how CVDs are addressed with respect to climate change in the Indian policy space. We identified 10 relevant national-level policies, which were analysed using the framework method. Our analytical framework consisted of four themes: (1) political commitment; (2) health information systems; (3) capacity building; and (4) cross-sectoral actions. Additionally, we analysed a subset of these policies and 29 state-level climate change and health action plans using content analysis to identify health priorities. Our analyses revealed a political commitment in addressing the health impacts of climate change; however, CVDs were poorly contextualized with most of the efforts focusing on vector-borne and other communicable diseases, despite their recognized burden. Heat-related illnesses and cardiopulmonary diseases were also focused on but failed to encompass the most climate-sensitive aspects. CVDs are insufficiently addressed in the existing surveillance systems, despite being mentioned in several policies and interventions, including emergency preparedness in hospitals and cross-sectoral actions. CVDs are mentioned as a separate section in only a small number of state-level plans, several of which need an impetus to complete and include CVD-specific sections. We also found several climate-health policies for specific diseases, albeit not for CVDs. This study identified important gaps in India's disease-specific climate change response and might aid policymakers in strengthening future versions of these policies and boost research and context-specific interventions on climate change and CVDs.
{"title":"A review of climate change and cardiovascular diseases in the Indian policy context.","authors":"Shreya S Shrikhande, Ravivarman Lakshmanasamy, Martin Röösli, Mohamed Aqiel Dalvie, Jürg Utzinger, Guéladio Cissé","doi":"10.1093/heapol/czae076","DOIUrl":"10.1093/heapol/czae076","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is growing evidence that climate change adversely affects human health. Multiple diseases are sensitive to climate change, including cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), which are also the leading cause of death globally. Countries such as India face a compounded challenge, with a growing burden of CVDs and a high vulnerability to climate change, requiring a co-ordinated, multi-sectoral response. In this framework synthesis, we analysed whether and how CVDs are addressed with respect to climate change in the Indian policy space. We identified 10 relevant national-level policies, which were analysed using the framework method. Our analytical framework consisted of four themes: (1) political commitment; (2) health information systems; (3) capacity building; and (4) cross-sectoral actions. Additionally, we analysed a subset of these policies and 29 state-level climate change and health action plans using content analysis to identify health priorities. Our analyses revealed a political commitment in addressing the health impacts of climate change; however, CVDs were poorly contextualized with most of the efforts focusing on vector-borne and other communicable diseases, despite their recognized burden. Heat-related illnesses and cardiopulmonary diseases were also focused on but failed to encompass the most climate-sensitive aspects. CVDs are insufficiently addressed in the existing surveillance systems, despite being mentioned in several policies and interventions, including emergency preparedness in hospitals and cross-sectoral actions. CVDs are mentioned as a separate section in only a small number of state-level plans, several of which need an impetus to complete and include CVD-specific sections. We also found several climate-health policies for specific diseases, albeit not for CVDs. This study identified important gaps in India's disease-specific climate change response and might aid policymakers in strengthening future versions of these policies and boost research and context-specific interventions on climate change and CVDs.</p>","PeriodicalId":12926,"journal":{"name":"Health policy and planning","volume":" ","pages":"1109-1124"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11562124/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142055408","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The results-based financing (RBF) programme, first implemented in Zimbabwe in 2011 and gradually expanded to other districts, aimed to address disparities in maternal health outcomes by improving the utilization of health services. This study leverages the staggered rollout of the programme as a quasi-experimental design to assess its impact on asset wealth-related inequalities in selected maternal health outcomes. The objective is to determine whether RBF can effectively reduce these disparities and promote equitable healthcare access. We employ an extended two-way fixed effects (ETWFE) model to exploit temporal variation in RBF implementation as well as individual-level variation in birth timing for identification. Utilizing pooled cross-sectional and nationally representative data from the Zimbabwe demographic and health surveys collected between 1999 and 2015, our analysis reveals significant reductions in relative and absolute maternal health inequalities, especially in the frequency and timing of prenatal care, delivery by caesarean section and family planning. Specifically, the RBF programme is associated with reductions in disparities for completing at least four or more prenatal care visits (-0.026, P < 0.01), first-trimester prenatal care (-0.033, P < 0.01), delivery by caesarean section (-0.028, P < 0.005) and family planning (-0.033, P < 0.005). Additionally, the programme is associated with improved prenatal care quality, as evidenced by progress on the prenatal care quality index (-0.040, P < 0.01). These effects are more pronounced among lower socio-economic groups in RBF districts, highlighting RBF's potential to promote equitable healthcare access. Our findings advocate for targeted policy interventions prioritizing expanding access to critical maternal health services in underserved areas and incorporating equity-focused measures within RBF frameworks to ensure inclusive and effective healthcare delivery in Zimbabwe and other low-income countries.
{"title":"Closing the gap? Results-based financing and socio-economic-related inequalities in maternal health outcomes in Zimbabwe.","authors":"Marshall Makate, Nyasha Mahonye","doi":"10.1093/heapol/czae080","DOIUrl":"10.1093/heapol/czae080","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The results-based financing (RBF) programme, first implemented in Zimbabwe in 2011 and gradually expanded to other districts, aimed to address disparities in maternal health outcomes by improving the utilization of health services. This study leverages the staggered rollout of the programme as a quasi-experimental design to assess its impact on asset wealth-related inequalities in selected maternal health outcomes. The objective is to determine whether RBF can effectively reduce these disparities and promote equitable healthcare access. We employ an extended two-way fixed effects (ETWFE) model to exploit temporal variation in RBF implementation as well as individual-level variation in birth timing for identification. Utilizing pooled cross-sectional and nationally representative data from the Zimbabwe demographic and health surveys collected between 1999 and 2015, our analysis reveals significant reductions in relative and absolute maternal health inequalities, especially in the frequency and timing of prenatal care, delivery by caesarean section and family planning. Specifically, the RBF programme is associated with reductions in disparities for completing at least four or more prenatal care visits (-0.026, P < 0.01), first-trimester prenatal care (-0.033, P < 0.01), delivery by caesarean section (-0.028, P < 0.005) and family planning (-0.033, P < 0.005). Additionally, the programme is associated with improved prenatal care quality, as evidenced by progress on the prenatal care quality index (-0.040, P < 0.01). These effects are more pronounced among lower socio-economic groups in RBF districts, highlighting RBF's potential to promote equitable healthcare access. Our findings advocate for targeted policy interventions prioritizing expanding access to critical maternal health services in underserved areas and incorporating equity-focused measures within RBF frameworks to ensure inclusive and effective healthcare delivery in Zimbabwe and other low-income countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":12926,"journal":{"name":"Health policy and planning","volume":" ","pages":"1022-1031"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11562138/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142055409","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The deployment of the health workforce, carried out through initial and subsequent posting and transfer (PT), is a key element of health workforce management. However, the focus of the currently available PT literature is mostly on subsequent PT, and the distinction between initial and subsequent PT has received little research attention. Drawing on this gap, in this paper, we examine how doctors experience their subsequent PT compared with their initial postings in two states in India. The distinctions have been drawn using the prism of six norms that we developed as evidence for implied policy in the absence of documented policy. This mixed-methods study used in-depth interviews of doctors and key informants, with job histories providing quantitative data from their accounts of their PT experience. Based on the interviews of these frontline doctors and other key policy actors, this paper brings to light key differences between initial and subsequent postings as perceived by the doctors: compared with initial postings, where the State demands to meet service needs dominated, in subsequent postings, doctors exercised greater agency in determining outcomes, with native place a central preoccupation in their choices. Our analysis provides a nuanced understanding of PT environment through this shift in doctors' perceptions of their own position and power within the system, with a significant change in the behaviour of doctors in subsequent PT compared with their initial postings. The paper brings to light the changing behaviour of doctors with subsequent PT, providing a deeper understanding of PT environment, expanding the notion of PT beyond the simple dichotomy between service needs and doctors' requests.
{"title":"Changes from initial Posting to subsequent Posting and Transfer: a frontline perspective from India.","authors":"Bhaskar Purohit, Peter S Hill","doi":"10.1093/heapol/czae085","DOIUrl":"10.1093/heapol/czae085","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The deployment of the health workforce, carried out through initial and subsequent posting and transfer (PT), is a key element of health workforce management. However, the focus of the currently available PT literature is mostly on subsequent PT, and the distinction between initial and subsequent PT has received little research attention. Drawing on this gap, in this paper, we examine how doctors experience their subsequent PT compared with their initial postings in two states in India. The distinctions have been drawn using the prism of six norms that we developed as evidence for implied policy in the absence of documented policy. This mixed-methods study used in-depth interviews of doctors and key informants, with job histories providing quantitative data from their accounts of their PT experience. Based on the interviews of these frontline doctors and other key policy actors, this paper brings to light key differences between initial and subsequent postings as perceived by the doctors: compared with initial postings, where the State demands to meet service needs dominated, in subsequent postings, doctors exercised greater agency in determining outcomes, with native place a central preoccupation in their choices. Our analysis provides a nuanced understanding of PT environment through this shift in doctors' perceptions of their own position and power within the system, with a significant change in the behaviour of doctors in subsequent PT compared with their initial postings. The paper brings to light the changing behaviour of doctors with subsequent PT, providing a deeper understanding of PT environment, expanding the notion of PT beyond the simple dichotomy between service needs and doctors' requests.</p>","PeriodicalId":12926,"journal":{"name":"Health policy and planning","volume":" ","pages":"1055-1064"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11562108/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142055412","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
In low- and-middle-income countries (LMICs), private pharmacies play a crucial role in the supply of medicines and the provision of healthcare. However, they also engage in poor practices including the improper sale of medicines and caregiving beyond their legal scope. Addressing the deficiencies of private pharmacies can increase their potential contribution towards enhancing universal health coverage. Therefore, it is important to identify the determinants of their performance. The existing literature has mostly focused on pharmacy-level factors and their regulatory environment, ignoring the market in which they operate, particularly their relationship to existing public sector provision. In this study, we fill the gap in the literature by examining the relationship between the practices of private pharmacies and resource shortages in nearby public health facilities in Odisha, India. This is possible due to three novel primary datasets with detailed information on private pharmacies and different levels of public healthcare facilities, including their geospatial coordinates. We find that when public healthcare facilities experience shortages of healthcare workers and essential medicines, private pharmacies step in to fill the gaps created by adjusting the type and amount of care provision and medicine dispensing services. Moreover, the relationship depends on their location, with public facilities and private pharmacies in rural areas performing substitutive caregiving roles, while they are complementary in urban areas. This study demonstrates how policies aimed at addressing resource shortages in public health facilities can generate dynamic responses from private pharmacies, highlighting the need for thorough scrutiny of the interaction between public healthcare facilities and private pharmacies in LMICs.
{"title":"Resource shortage in public health facilities and private pharmacy practices in Odisha, India.","authors":"Bijetri Bose, Terence C Cheng, Anuska Kalita, Annie Haakenstaad, Winnie Yip","doi":"10.1093/heapol/czae086","DOIUrl":"10.1093/heapol/czae086","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In low- and-middle-income countries (LMICs), private pharmacies play a crucial role in the supply of medicines and the provision of healthcare. However, they also engage in poor practices including the improper sale of medicines and caregiving beyond their legal scope. Addressing the deficiencies of private pharmacies can increase their potential contribution towards enhancing universal health coverage. Therefore, it is important to identify the determinants of their performance. The existing literature has mostly focused on pharmacy-level factors and their regulatory environment, ignoring the market in which they operate, particularly their relationship to existing public sector provision. In this study, we fill the gap in the literature by examining the relationship between the practices of private pharmacies and resource shortages in nearby public health facilities in Odisha, India. This is possible due to three novel primary datasets with detailed information on private pharmacies and different levels of public healthcare facilities, including their geospatial coordinates. We find that when public healthcare facilities experience shortages of healthcare workers and essential medicines, private pharmacies step in to fill the gaps created by adjusting the type and amount of care provision and medicine dispensing services. Moreover, the relationship depends on their location, with public facilities and private pharmacies in rural areas performing substitutive caregiving roles, while they are complementary in urban areas. This study demonstrates how policies aimed at addressing resource shortages in public health facilities can generate dynamic responses from private pharmacies, highlighting the need for thorough scrutiny of the interaction between public healthcare facilities and private pharmacies in LMICs.</p>","PeriodicalId":12926,"journal":{"name":"Health policy and planning","volume":" ","pages":"1074-1086"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11562114/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142139884","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Eneyi E Kpokiri, Mwelwa M Phiri, Melisa Martinez-Alvarez, Mandikudza Tembo, Chido Dziva Chikwari, Farirai Nzvere, Aoife M Doyle, Joseph D Tucker, Bernadette Hensen
Crowdsourcing strategies are useful in the development of public health interventions. Crowdsourcing engages end users in a co-creation process through challenge contests, designathons or online collaborations. Drawing on our experience of crowdsourcing in four African countries, we provide guidance on designing crowdsourcing strategies across seven steps: deciding on the type of crowdsourcing strategy, convening a steering committee, developing the content of the call for ideas, promotion, evaluation, recognizing finalists and sharing back ideas or implementing the solutions.
{"title":"How to (or how not to) implement crowdsourcing for the development of health interventions: lessons learned from four African countries.","authors":"Eneyi E Kpokiri, Mwelwa M Phiri, Melisa Martinez-Alvarez, Mandikudza Tembo, Chido Dziva Chikwari, Farirai Nzvere, Aoife M Doyle, Joseph D Tucker, Bernadette Hensen","doi":"10.1093/heapol/czae078","DOIUrl":"10.1093/heapol/czae078","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Crowdsourcing strategies are useful in the development of public health interventions. Crowdsourcing engages end users in a co-creation process through challenge contests, designathons or online collaborations. Drawing on our experience of crowdsourcing in four African countries, we provide guidance on designing crowdsourcing strategies across seven steps: deciding on the type of crowdsourcing strategy, convening a steering committee, developing the content of the call for ideas, promotion, evaluation, recognizing finalists and sharing back ideas or implementing the solutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":12926,"journal":{"name":"Health policy and planning","volume":" ","pages":"1125-1131"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11562121/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142463912","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Xinyi Liu, Chunhui Gao, Mingyue Wei, Guohong Li, Xianqun Fan
This study explores the effect of the transformation of paediatric healthcare through the implementation of the Family Mutual Aid System (FMAS) for personal medical insurance accounts, among paediatric patients at a children's hospital (Hospital A in Shanghai, China). We conducted a cohort study in the endocrinology department of Hospital A from August 2021 to July 2023 to assess the impact of the FMAS enrolment on patients' annual outpatient visits, annual outpatient expenditures, and the allocation of these costs among the Basic Medical Insurance Pooling Fund and patients' out-of-pocket (OOP) expenses, with a further subdivision into online and offline consultations. Analysis employed a weighted Difference-in-Differences approach within a fixed-effects model following Propensity Score Matching. The study encompassed 10,975 paediatric patients, divided into those enrolled in the FMAS (observation group) and those not (control group). Enrolment in FMAS was associated with a statistically significant increase in annual outpatient visits by an average of 1.107, predominantly attributed to an uptick in offline consultations. Additionally, there was a substantial 38.9% rise in annual outpatient costs. Detailed analysis revealed a 52.5% increase in costs covered by the medical insurance pooling fund, while patients' OOP expenses decreased by an average of 69.2%. These findings highlight the beneficial effects of FMAS enrolment on healthcare service utilization and risk-sharing mechanisms of medical insurance.
{"title":"Impact of Family Mutual Aid System for Personal Medical Insurance Accounts on Paediatric Patients' Outpatient Utilisation Patterns and Costs: a difference-in-differences analysis.","authors":"Xinyi Liu, Chunhui Gao, Mingyue Wei, Guohong Li, Xianqun Fan","doi":"10.1093/heapol/czae100","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czae100","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study explores the effect of the transformation of paediatric healthcare through the implementation of the Family Mutual Aid System (FMAS) for personal medical insurance accounts, among paediatric patients at a children's hospital (Hospital A in Shanghai, China). We conducted a cohort study in the endocrinology department of Hospital A from August 2021 to July 2023 to assess the impact of the FMAS enrolment on patients' annual outpatient visits, annual outpatient expenditures, and the allocation of these costs among the Basic Medical Insurance Pooling Fund and patients' out-of-pocket (OOP) expenses, with a further subdivision into online and offline consultations. Analysis employed a weighted Difference-in-Differences approach within a fixed-effects model following Propensity Score Matching. The study encompassed 10,975 paediatric patients, divided into those enrolled in the FMAS (observation group) and those not (control group). Enrolment in FMAS was associated with a statistically significant increase in annual outpatient visits by an average of 1.107, predominantly attributed to an uptick in offline consultations. Additionally, there was a substantial 38.9% rise in annual outpatient costs. Detailed analysis revealed a 52.5% increase in costs covered by the medical insurance pooling fund, while patients' OOP expenses decreased by an average of 69.2%. These findings highlight the beneficial effects of FMAS enrolment on healthcare service utilization and risk-sharing mechanisms of medical insurance.</p>","PeriodicalId":12926,"journal":{"name":"Health policy and planning","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142619056","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Xiaoying Zhu, Ajay Mahal, Shenglan Tang, Barbara Mcpake
This paper evaluates the relationship between the degree of cost-sharing and the utilization of outpatient and inpatient health services in China. Using data from the 2015 China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS), we estimated the association between outpatient and inpatient service utilization and cost-sharing levels associated with outpatient and inpatient services, as well as a comparative metric that quantifies the relative cost-sharing burden between the two. We found that patients in areas with higher levels of cost-sharing for outpatient services exhibit a lower propensity to use outpatient care and a higher inclination to utilize costly hospitalisation services. Conversely, as the ratio of cost-sharing for outpatient services to that for inpatient services increases, the likelihood of patients forgoing doctor-initiated hospitalisation correspondingly increases. This suggests that when cost-sharing for outpatient care rises relative to inpatient care, observed increases in inpatient care utilization reflect an escalation in moral hazard rather than a correction for the underutilization of inpatient services. We conclude that both substitution and complementary roles exist between outpatient and inpatient services. Our findings suggest that a more effective design of cost-sharing is needed to enhance the equity and efficiency of China's health system.
{"title":"A Chinese conundrum: Does higher insurance coverage for hospitalisation reduce financial protection for the patients who most need it?","authors":"Xiaoying Zhu, Ajay Mahal, Shenglan Tang, Barbara Mcpake","doi":"10.1093/heapol/czae108","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czae108","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper evaluates the relationship between the degree of cost-sharing and the utilization of outpatient and inpatient health services in China. Using data from the 2015 China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS), we estimated the association between outpatient and inpatient service utilization and cost-sharing levels associated with outpatient and inpatient services, as well as a comparative metric that quantifies the relative cost-sharing burden between the two. We found that patients in areas with higher levels of cost-sharing for outpatient services exhibit a lower propensity to use outpatient care and a higher inclination to utilize costly hospitalisation services. Conversely, as the ratio of cost-sharing for outpatient services to that for inpatient services increases, the likelihood of patients forgoing doctor-initiated hospitalisation correspondingly increases. This suggests that when cost-sharing for outpatient care rises relative to inpatient care, observed increases in inpatient care utilization reflect an escalation in moral hazard rather than a correction for the underutilization of inpatient services. We conclude that both substitution and complementary roles exist between outpatient and inpatient services. Our findings suggest that a more effective design of cost-sharing is needed to enhance the equity and efficiency of China's health system.</p>","PeriodicalId":12926,"journal":{"name":"Health policy and planning","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142619053","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Correction to: Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation for health systems.","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/heapol/czae103","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czae103","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12926,"journal":{"name":"Health policy and planning","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142619055","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}