Health最新文献

Australia is world renowned when it comes to its successful response to HIV prevention, but their HIV epidemiological trend has shifted towards the increase of new HIV diagnoses among migrants. This paper reveals a neglected determinant of migrants' health within Australian HIV care, and that is: racism. To provoke a debate on the saliency of racism, I used autoethnographic case study to analyse my encounter with racism in Australian HIV care. I argue migrants who live with HIV can be racially classified by health care professionals into 'good' or 'bad migrants' based on biomedical measures, neoliberal values and dehumanising health care provision. A migrant patient becomes a bad migrant if the person is perceived to be incapable of taking personal responsibility over their treatment, is a burden to the health system and deserving of poor HIV care. Decolonising HIV care is a necessity to stop the subtle yet insidious social reproduction of racism.

The US Anti-Doping Agency (USADA) and Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) recently ended their anti-doping partnership amidst controversy. We treat this decision, and the motivations underpinning it, as a means of exploring the complexities of anti-doping norms and the blurred lines between image and performance enhancing drug (IPED) use in sport and wider society. Drawing ideas from assemblage thinking, we analyse the evolving power dynamics surrounding IPED use, anti-doping policy, and the role of popular athletes in shaping societal perceptions of the use of, and potential harms associated with IPEDs. The study offers a case analysis of recent controversies in the UFC to investigate the entanglements of biomedicine, technology and celebrity culture in what we call the IPED assemblage. The 2023 termination of the USADA-UFC partnership has sparked debates about shifts in anti-doping standards, raising concerns about weaker testing protocols and perceptions of IPED normalisation. The case of Conor McGregor's injury recovery and alleged IPED use underscores the blurred lines between therapeutic and enhancement drug use within the IPED assemblage, challenging conventional distinctions between 'good' and 'bad' drugs in the context of sports management and anti-doping policy making. We highlight the inadequacy of current doping policies in responding to the IPED assemblage and highlight the need to shift public discourse to foster a more critical understanding of therapeutic and enhancement strategies to drive innovation in anti-doping frameworks.

A great deal of research has shown that health inequalities are the product of socially unequal wear and tear of bodies, socially differentiated use of the healthcare system and unequal access to care, as well as healthcare professionals' differentiating practices. However, public policies are rarely the focus of recent investigations on the production of health inequalities. How can public policies produce or even amplify health inequalities, but also reduce them, or fail to do so? This study aims to investigate the impact of online appointment booking on effective access to Covid-19 vaccination. Through a quantitative survey of the first weeks of vaccination against Covid-19 in 2021 in an undeserved French suburb called Seine-Saint-Denis, this paper shows how the vaccination policy has contributed to reproducing and amplifying inequalities towards Covid-19: middle and upper classes are significantly more represented among people vaccinated (67%) than in the population of Seine-SaintDenis (41%), and working classes are significantly less represented (33%) than in Seine-Saint-Denis (59%). The people vaccinated are more highly educated and more often French than the population of SeineSaint-Denis. Online appointment favoured more educated people.

For people in suicidal crisis, referral to a psychiatric hospital is common. However, acute psychiatry is characterized by a lack of resources in terms of time and beds, making it challenging for therapists to provide person-centered care. In this qualitative study, we explored the experiences and positionings of therapists and suicidal patients in an acute psychiatric ward in Norway. We generated data through participatory observation and interviews with therapists and patients and analyzed the material using principles from Systematic Text Condensation supplemented with an analysis from a Positioning theory perspective. We developed two themes: Therapists positioned as professionals with authority in a context with restricted action radius, and Patients in suicidal crisis positioned as medical subjects with limited influence. In this resource-limited context, therapists managed their work and obligations by simplifying the patient's suffering and suicidality and by emphasizing medical aspects. Ensuring an efficient patient flow was a high priority. The therapists' authority and actions were closely connected to how patients were positioned and their experiences of the care. Positioning theory provides new perspectives for understanding the power imbalance in the positions of therapists and patients. The findings provide insights into acute inpatient psychiatry as a normative field where the choices and actions of both therapists and patients are restricted. In that sense, both patients and therapists can feel powerless. The findings point to significant limitations in the acute mental health care of people in suicidal crisis.

Drawing on ethnographic fieldwork in Finland, we report on the trial of a teleoperated care robot named Välkky introduced onto a fully operational hospital neurological ward. Our data revealed a narrative arc where participants' early expectations of the hospital-based trial altered as the project unfolded. Greeted with techno-excitement and experimental enthusiasm about the place of robotics in reshaping roles within clinical care, Välkky became the focus for collaborative in situ learning, adaptation and redesign amongst the roboticists, designers, nurses, patients, and managers. Välkky acted as an 'attractor' provoking thinking about, and a reimagining of, future arrangements of care. Our empirically informed insights seek to pave the way for real-world nuanced thinking that pushes beyond human/non-human and success/failure binaries. Building on debates in STS and feminist posthumanism, we propose a robocentric approach, which encourages us to 'queer' health care robots, and to understand them as fluid, hybrid, distributed and relational figures, rather than purely as inert, mechanical, non-human objects that might replace humans. Nursing care practices by and with robots will generate new meanings and practices of care that will emerge iteratively, as caring relations, relationships and practices develop within the context of operational ward environments. Robots may or may not be able support care, but they will invariably challenge what care is.

The legitimacy of complementary and alternative medicines (CAMs) and their integration into mainstream healthcare have long been a topic in sociological discussions. This study examines the institutional influences on Chinese medicine (CM), an important CAM in mainland China and Hong Kong. In-depth interviews with practitioners and observations in public hospitals facilitate a comparison of the professional boundaries, statuses, and jurisdictions of CM in the two regions. In mainland China, CM has a high degree of state-granted legitimacy with blurred professional boundaries between CM and Western medicine (WM) in a highly integrated healthcare system. However, these blurred boundaries have had the following unintended consequences: (i) devaluation of traditional knowledge in CM education and practices, (ii) biomedicalisation of CM practices wherein a substantial reliance on WM has decreased the utilisation of healing principles in CM and (iii) ambiguity in the efficacy of CM due to the co-use of CM and WM. In contrast, the demarcated professional boundaries in Hong Kong have allowed CM to maintain its knowledge base, even though CM is practised within strict parameters. This study reveals that institutional requirements (on efficiency, accountability and profitability) prioritise the biomedical model and drive the biomedicalisation of CM. Therefore, the lack of clear professional boundaries in the current integrative medical system in mainland China have eroded the knowledge base of CM and undermined the efficacy-based legitimacy of CM.

In recent years, medical sociology has produced a significant amount of publications about the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on medical care provision and healthcare professionalism around the globe. This study builds on this line of research by looking at a rarely discussed case of pandemic management-the case of Russia's centralized and state-dominated medical sector. In our analysis, we focus on the organizational level and the institutional work of front-line health professionals. Using a neoinstitutional theoretical lens, we show how, as a result of the conflict between professional and managerial logics, pockets of extreme institutional uncertainty emerged within Russian healthcare: "non-COVID" healthcare facilities and hospitals rapidly restructured for COVID-19 care. Qualitative interviews with healthcare professionals indicate that institutional misalignment inside these "gray zones" translated into the material dimension, significantly impeding the effectiveness of the pandemic response. While sociological literature frequently portrays Russian health professionals as fully subjected to administrative constraints and disempowered, our data allows us to trace their informal institutional work and agency during the health crisis. Through these materially mediated work, our informants attempted to deal with both the challenges of the pandemic and institutional contradictions of the Russian healthcare system. Professionals' institutional work brought some improvements to Russia's pandemic-affected clinical settings. However, being informal and purposefully hidden, it neither constituted a viable solution for medical organizations, nor contributed to the strengthening of professionals' autonomy.

Implementing telemedicine technologies (TT) for patient-physician communication leads to the emergence of new structures of boundaries. Hence, boundary work theory can provide a useful lens for examining how primary care physicians (PCPs) experience TT. The objective of this research was to examine the experiences of PCPs in using TT in their communication with patients. During 2023 in-depth interviews were conducted with 20 Israeli PCPs: family physicians and pediatricians. The concept of boundary work emerged as a focal point, with three forms of boundary work identified in the PCPs' descriptions of their TT experiences: collaborative, competitive, and configurational. Interviewees described improved collaboration with patients who find it difficult to get to the clinic and better service for administrative issues. However, they reported constant power struggles to maintain their authority. They expressed concern about treatment failure and suggested that healthcare organizations reconfigure TT so that it can be used to provide optimal care. They suggested that healthcare organizations should instruct physicians how to best manage TT consultations and regulate its usage. This article demonstrates that while implementing TT in primary care has many advantages, it uncovers boundary work for maintaining power and authority that both PCPs and healthcare organizations should take into account in practice as well as in policy.

This article aims to contribute to the discussion about medication literacy, by focussing on the social contextuality of the information mobilised in the use of medicines. We aim to explore the social construction processes of medication literacy, as an essential dimension for a more layperson-centred approach in the promotion of literacy in this field. This approach is justified by the growing social and cultural dissemination of medication use, the diversification of its uses beyond health and illness, and the increasing degree of lay autonomy in managing its use. The article is organised in two main sections. In the first section, we review the social history of medication literacy, including a discussion of the social contextuality of literacy phenomena. In the second section, the analysis of social contextuality is operationalised with a focus on information, covering: (i) ways of relating to institutional information and sources of information about medication; (ii) contexts of sociability in which information is shared and validated. This analysis is empirically supported by selected results from two research projects, conducted in Portugal, on the consumption of medicines and dietary supplements for performance purposes - that is, for the management and/or improvement of cognitive, bodily or relational performance.

The article explores how sensations of pain are turned into embodied knowledge in endometriosis, a chronic gynaecological illness characterized by persistent, possibly paralysing pain. While previous studies have shown how people with endometriosis struggle to achieve accurate diagnosis and effective treatment, we examine the ways in which some of these difficulties are rooted in the complexities of embodied experiences of endometriosis pain and the challenges of translating the sensed patterns and shifts in pain into a language acknowledged within a clinical setting. Building on a phenomenologically inspired approach to chronic pain and drawing on interviews with people diagnosed with endometriosis in Finland, we examine how our interlocutors use their embodied sensations of pain to adapt to the evolving biomedical and lived surroundings in which their pain is evaluated and managed. The analysis shows how living with chronic pain involves constantly attuning to the multitude of symptoms as well as developing personal strategies of communicating sensations of pain to gain medical recognition and care. We argue that while the lived complexities of the body with endometriosis may fall outside the scope of medical practices of measuring, such complexities nevertheless require medical acknowledgment and careful attention.