Hospital Pharmacy最新文献

Background: Several antimicrobial stewardship interventions have demonstrated improved clinical outcomes. Though the impact of a pharmacist-led antimicrobial stewardship review of cultures has been described, studies have not evaluated such an intervention in institutions that primarily serve cancer patients. Aim: To describe the impact of the antimicrobial stewardship pharmacist's review of microbiological cultures from adult cancer patients in the ambulatory setting. Method: A retrospective study at a comprehensive cancer center that included adult cancer patients with positive microbiological cultures treated in the ambulatory setting, between August 2020 and February 2021. The cultures were reviewed in real time by the antimicrobial stewardship pharmacist, and were assessed for appropriateness of treatment. The number of antimicrobial modifications made, type of modifications, and physicians' acceptance rate were recorded. Results: A total of 661 cultures from 504 patients were reviewed by the pharmacist. The mean age of patients was 58 years ± 16 (SD); most had solid tumors (95%), and 34% were recent recipients of chemotherapy. Among the reviewed cultures, 175 (26%) required antimicrobial therapy modification, with an acceptance rate of 86%. The modifications consisted of changing from non-susceptible to susceptible antimicrobials (n = 95, 54%), initiation (n = 61, 35%), discontinuation (n = 10, 6%), de-escalation (n = 7, 4%), and dose modification (n = 2, 1%) of antimicrobials. Conclusion: Around one fourth of the cultures reviewed by the antimicrobial stewardship pharmacist in the ambulatory setting required interventions to optimize therapy. Future studies should evaluate the impact of these interventions on clinical outcomes.

Background: Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are over-diagnosed and over-treated in the emergency department (ED) leading to unnecessary antibiotic exposure and avoidable side effects. However, data describing effective large-scale antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) interventions to improve UTI and asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) management in the ED are lacking. Methods: We implemented a multifaceted intervention across 23 community hospital EDs in Utah and Idaho consisting of in-person education for ED prescribers, updated electronic order sets, and implementation/dissemination of UTI guidelines for our healthcare system. We compared ED UTI antibiotic prescribing in 2021 (post-intervention) to baseline data from 2017 (pre-intervention). The primary outcomes were the percent of cystitis patients prescribed fluoroquinolones or prolonged antibiotic durations (>7 days). Secondary outcomes included the percent of patients treated for UTI who met ASB criteria, and 14-day UTI-related readmissions. Results: There was a significant decrease in prolonged treatment duration for cystitis (29% vs 12%, P < .01) and treatment of cystitis with a fluoroquinolone (32% vs 7%, P < .01). The percent of patients treated for UTI who met ASB criteria did not change following the intervention (28% pre-intervention versus 29% post-intervention, P = .97). A subgroup analysis indicated that ASB prescriptions were highly variable by facility (range 11%-53%) and provider (range 0%-71%) and were driven by a few high prescribers. Conclusions: The intervention was associated with improved antibiotic selection and duration for cystitis, but future interventions to improve urine testing and provide individualized prescriber feedback are likely needed to improve ASB prescribing practice.

Purpose: Recent studies suggest a large percentage of post-surgical opioid prescriptions are not utilized. This surplus of opioids provides supply for diversion or entry into the waste cycle. Recommendations are available for general surgery procedures which may optimize prescribed quantity while maintaining patient satisfaction which this work was initiated to investigate. Methods: This retrospective patient survey was conducted with Institutional Review Committee approval following adjustments to discharge opioid prescription quantities in an individual General Surgeon practice. Patients were contacted via phone to assess the impact of the reduced opioid quantities. Patients were categorized based on whether they utilized the entire prescription or opioid remained. Data collected include baseline demographics, inpatient stay characteristics, opioid use patterns, and satisfaction with overall pain control. The primary endpoint was to determine if patients were satisfied with their pain control based on response. Secondary endpoints included if patient characteristics could be identified that signal larger opioid quantity use, and whether unused opioids were disposed. Results: Thirty patients utilized all opioid prescribed, 60 had some quantity remaining. Baseline data appear similar aside from age with younger patients using more opioid. Patients were satisfied with their overall pain control in 93% of respondents. A total of 960 opioid tablets (11.4 ± 4.8 tabs/patient) were not prescribed, 8% required refill. Opioid disposal yet to occur in 85% of patients. Conclusion: An evidence-based reduction in opioid discharge prescriptions following general surgery procedures resulted in nearly 1000 opioid tablets not being dispensed without having a negative impact on patient satisfaction.

The management of the drug-drug interaction (DDI) between primidone, a moderate to strong cytochrome P-450 (CYP) 3A4 inducer, and apixaban, a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) and CYP3A4 substrate is complex and limited evidence exists to guide management. This case report describes a 65-year-old male, receiving primidone for essential tremor who developed an acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) requiring oral anticoagulation. DOACs are preferred over vitamin K antagonists for acute VTE treatment. Based on patient-specific variables, provider preference, and the avoidance of other DDIs, apixaban was selected. Apixaban's package insert recommends avoiding use with concomitant strong P-gp and CYP3A4 inducers due to the decreased exposure to apixaban; however, no recommendations are available for drugs that are moderate to strong CYP3A4 inducers and lack P-gp effects. Given that phenobarbital is an active metabolite of primidone, extrapolation of evidence from such literature is theoretical but provides insight into the management of this multi-faceted DDI. In the absence of the ability to monitor plasma apixaban levels, a management strategy of avoidance with a washout period of primidone based on pharmacokinetic parameters was used in this case. Additional evidence is needed to clearly understand the degree of impact and clinical significance of the DDI between apixaban and primidone.

Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i), or gliptins, are a widely used glucose-lowering agents. A growing amount of evidence pointed to a possible role of DPP-4i in the induction of bullous pemphigoid (BP), which is an auto-immune skin blistering disease that mainly affects the elderly. In this article we discuss a case of DPP-4i associated BP and we provide an updated review of the current knowledge regarding this emerging entity. Use of DPP-4i, particularly vildagliptin, was found to significantly increase the risk of BP. BP180 would be in the center of the aberrant immune response. DPP-4i induced BP is thought to be associated with male gender, mucosal involvement, and milder inflammatory phenotype especially in Asian population. Generally, patients may not remit fully after DPP-4i withdrawal only and require either topical or systemic glucocorticoid courses.

Introduction: There are currently limited published data for a pharmacist-led multidrug-resistant (MDR) culture follow-up program through a collaborative drug therapy management (CDTM) agreement in the emergency department (ED). Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the impact of a pharmacist-led culture follow-up program for MDR microbiology results on ED revisit rate. Methods: A single-center quasi-experimental retrospective study was conducted comparing the outcomes before (December 2017 to March 2019) and after (April 2019 to July 2020) implementation of the ED MDR Culture program. Patients 18 years of age or older; with confirmed positive microbiology culture of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBL), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) at any site; and discharged from the ED were included. The primary outcome was to evaluate ED revisit within 30 days due to antimicrobial treatment failure, defined as lack of resolution or worsening of infection. A statistical analysis was performed for categorical data using Fisher's exact test, and for continuous data using unpaired t test or Mann-Whitney U Test, when applicable. Results: A total of 130 patients were included in the analysis. Patients in the post-implementation group (n = 70) had a significant reduction in ED revisits compared to the pre-implementation group (n = 60); 9 [12.9%] versus 17 [28.3%], respectively; P = .046. Conclusion: Implementation of an ED MDR culture program was associated with significantly less ED revisits within 30 days due to antimicrobial treatment failure, thus demonstrating the expanded role of ED pharmacists in antimicrobial stewardship in the outpatient setting.

Background: Ceftriaxone is a commonly utilized antibiotic for the treatment of urinary tract infections (UTI) despite the limited literature supporting its use. Opportunities for antimicrobial stewardship (ASP), including IV-to-PO conversions and de-escalation of therapy, are often missed in the hospital setting.

Objective: The study reported here describes the utilization of ceftriaxone in patients admitted to the hospital and treated for UTIs in a large health system, focusing on opportunities for IV-to-PO conversion of antibiotic therapy.

Methods: This was a multi-center, retrospective, descriptive study conducted in a large health system. Patients admitted from January 2019 to July 2019 were included for analysis if they were 18 years or older at admission, diagnosed with acute cystitis, acute pyelonephritis, or unspecified UTI, and received two or more doses of ceftriaxone. The primary outcome was to evaluate the percentage of patients who were eligible for conversion from IV ceftriaxone to oral antibiotics while admitted to the hospital based on the defined criteria for automatic pharmacist conversion in the health system. Percentage of urine cultures with susceptibility to cefazolin, the duration of antibiotic therapy in the hospital, and an evaluation of oral antibiotics prescribed at discharge were also recorded.

Results: A total of 300 patients were included; 88% met the pre-specified criteria for IV-to-PO conversion, but only 12% were converted from IV-to-PO antibiotics during hospitalization. Approximately 65% of patients remained on IV ceftriaxone until discharge, at which time they were converted to a PO antibiotic, most commonly fluoroquinolones followed by third-generation cephalosporins.

Conclusion: Patients admitted to the hospital and receiving treatment with ceftriaxone for UTI were infrequently converted to oral therapy prior to discharge despite meeting criteria for automatic pharmacist IV-to-PO conversion. Findings highlight opportunities to contribute to antimicrobial stewardship initiatives across the health system and the importance of tracking and reporting results to frontline providers.

Each month, subscribers to The Formulary Monograph Service receive 5 to 6 well-documented monographs on drugs that are newly released or are in late phase 3 trials. The monographs are targeted to Pharmacy & Therapeutics Committees. Subscribers also receive monthly 1-page summary monographs on agents that are useful for agendas and pharmacy/nursing in-services. A comprehensive target drug utilization evaluation/medication use evaluation (DUE/MUE) is also provided each month. With a subscription, the monographs are available online to subscribers. Monographs can be customized to meet the needs of a facility. Through the cooperation of The Formulary, Hospital Pharmacy publishes selected reviews in this column. For more information about The Formulary Monograph Service, contact Wolters Kluwer customer service at 866-397-3433.

Each month, subscribers to The Formulary Monograph Service receive 5 to 6 well-documented monographs on drugs that are newly released or are in late phase 3 trials. The monographs are targeted to Pharmacy & Therapeutics Committees. Subscribers also receive monthly 1-page summary monographs on agents that are useful for agendas and pharmacy/nursing in-services. A comprehensive target drug utilization evaluation/medication use evaluation (DUE/MUE) is also provided each month. With a subscription, the monographs are available online to subscribers. Monographs can be customized to meet the needs of a facility. Through the cooperation of The Formulary, Hospital Pharmacy publishes selected reviews in this column. For more information about The Formulary Monograph Service, contact Wolters Kluwer customer service at 866-397-3433.

Background: Haloperidol is commonly prescribed to patients with alcohol-induced psychotic disorder (AIPD). Notably however, individuals differ extensively with regards to therapeutic response and adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Previous studies have shown that haloperidol biotransformation is mainly metabolized by CYP2D6. Objective: The objective of our study was to investigate the use of pharmacogenetic (CYP2D6*4 genetic polymorphism) and pharmacometabolomic biomarkers to predict haloperidol efficacy and safety rates. Material and Methods: The study enrolled 150 patients with AIPD. Therapy included haloperidol in a daily dose of 5 to 10 mg/day by injections for 5 days. Efficacy and safety of treatment were evaluated using the validated psychometric scales PANSS, UKU, and SAS. Results: No association of the urinary 6-НО-ТНВС/pinoline ratio values which could be evidence of the CYP2D6 activity level with both the efficacy and safety rates of haloperidol was demonstrated. However, a statistically significant association between haloperidol safety profile and CYP2D6*4 genetic polymorphism was demonstrated (P < .001). Conclusion: To predict haloperidol efficacy and safety rates, utilization of pharmacogenetic testing that defines CYP2D6*4 genetic polymorphism is found preferable over the use of the pharmacometabolomic marker in a clinical setting.