Hospital Pharmacy最新文献

Background: Immune Thrombocytopenia Purpura (ITP) is a hematological disorder, where its primary cause is unknown. This can be triggered through any secondary underlying diseases or other environmental agents such as drugs, vaccination, natural viral infections etc. After the introduction of COVID-19 vaccines, a 4-fold increase in ITP cases was observed globally. Many of the COVID-19 vaccines such as m-RNA and viral-vector vaccines already demonstrated a cause-effect relationship between the event of ITP and immunization. Case presentation: A 54 year old diabetic patient presented to the hospital with complaints of gum bleeding and fatigue. He was diagnosed with severe ITP following COVID-19 vaccination with a platelet count of 5000 cumm. Initially his condition was considered as idiopathic and the COVID-19 vaccine exposure (13 days prior to the clinical presentation) was not suspected. Later the immunization timeline and onset of the reaction was traced by his hematologist. The patient underwent multiple platelet transfusions and was given corticosteroid therapy. The patient was followed for a period of 1 year and throughout the follow-up period the patient had fluctuating platelets count, especially after tapering steroids. Conclusion: ITP in this case is found to have a consistent causal association to COVID-19 vaccination as per the World Health Organization Causality assessment algorithm and is categorized under vaccine product related reactions. One year follow-up conducted showed that the thrombocytopenia following COVID-19 vaccine may be prolonged.

Background: In 2002, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) in collaboration with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) established the Surgical Infection Prevention (SIP) project for the purposes of developing and standardizing quality improvement measures known to reduce the rates of post-operative surgical site infections (SSIs). Four years later the Surgical Care Improvement Project (SCIP), an expansion of SIP, was published in governmental Specifications Manual for National Inpatient Quality Measures and provided several additional initiatives applicable to the perioperative period. Central to both projects are the assurance of the timeliness, selection, and duration of peri-operative surgical prophylactic antibiotics. In support of this objective, various medical associations, such as the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP) and the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), have developed the Clinical Practice Guidelines for Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Surgery. To ensure compliance with quality measures, hospitals are required to report data to the Physicians Quality Reporting System, which is then reviewed by CMS for reimbursement purposes and to measure hospital performance. To maintain optimal standards of care and satisfy all core measures, it is expected that patients undergoing most categories of surgical procedures receive prophylactic antibiotics. We recognized that patients already being administered antimicrobial therapy as treatment for the condition requiring the surgery not uncommonly also were prescribed unwarranted and redundant pre-operative antibiotics. Our study was meant to quantify such antibiotic redundancy, which only risks the development of antimicrobial resistance and adverse events, to bolster our and other hospitals antimicrobial stewardship programs. Methods: A retrospective analysis of computerized hospital records over a one-month period of time (November 2022) was conducted focusing on hospital admissions that involved surgical operative procedures. Only those patients who had received a pre-operative surgical prophylactic antibiotic were included in the analysis. Results: Of the 92 surgeries that fulfilled the inclusion criteria, 38 (41.3%) were performed on patients who were already receiving therapeutic antibiotics for more than 24 hours targeted to treat the infection for which they were undergoing surgery. These included laparoscopic cholecystectomy (24), appendectomy (12), wound debridement (12), and soft tissue incision and drainage procedures (9), comprising nearly 50% of each type of these operations performed during the study time period. Conclusion: These findings demonstrate a clear opportunity to strengthen both our, and presumably other, hospitals antimicrobial stewardship programs. Together with physician education, granting the pharmacy the ability to cancel unnecessary and re

Purpose: Cefepime is an antibiotic associated with cefepime induced neurotoxicity (CIN), particularly in those with reduced renal function, or in cases of inappropriate medication dosing. This report describes a case of CIN associated with a change in infusion duration from 180 to30 minutes, which to the best of our knowledge has not been previously reported in the literature. Summary: A 73-year old male was treated with extended infusion cefepime over 180 minutes while hospitalized with recurrent pneumonia. On discharge, cefepime was continued as outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) administered over 30 minutes. The patient began to experience symptoms of neurotoxicity after 1 day of receiving OPAT, which subsequently led to a readmission as neurological symptoms worsened. Cefepime was discontinued and symptoms resolved within 48 hours. Renal function was stable throughout treatment and no other causes for neurotoxicity were noted. Conclusion: This is a unique case of CIN secondary to shortened infusion time, which is clinically relevant, particularly during transitions of care. Further investigation, including more widespread use of therapeutic drug monitoring will be beneficial to further elucidate the relationship between infusion time and CIN development.

Purpose: Vancomycin is recommended as first-line treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia, dosed by area-under-the-curve (AUC) with an assumed minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 1 mcg/mL via broth microdilution. The purpose of this study was to compare effectiveness of AUC-based and trough-based dosing in MRSA bacteremia with an MIC > 1 mcg/mL via Etest. Methods: This was a retrospective, observational cohort that compared vancomycin dosed by AUC or trough between January 1, 2017 and September 1, 2022. The primary outcome was a composite of treatment failure defined as peristent bacteremia ≥ 7 days, inpatient mortality within 90 days, or microbiologic relapse or readmission within 30 days. Secondary outcomes compared nephrotoxicity, hospital and ICU length of stay, MIC differences, and difference in exposure measured by AUC. Results: Twenty-four patients in each group met inclusion criteria. For the primary outcome, there was no statistical difference in treatment failure between trough and AUC groups, respectively [10 (41.7%) vs 10 (41.7%), P = 1.000]. There was no statistical difference in secondary outcomes, with incidence of nephrotoxicity [3 (12.5%) trough vs 2 (8.33%) AUC, P = 1.000] and median AUC exposure over treatment course [502.9 mcg.h/mL (454.1-599.9) vs 474 mcg.h/mL (435.3-533), P = .312] similar between groups. Conclusion: There was no statistically significant difference in treatment failure for vancomycin by AUC or trough with an Etest MIC > 1 mcg/mL. Overall exposure to vancomycin and incidence of nephrotoxicty were numerically higher in the trough group, suggesting that dosing by AUC may limit exposure without impact on treatment failure.