Hospital Pharmacy最新文献

Background and Aims: The purpose of this study is to review the 2020 Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Guideline for Opioid Use Disorder recommendations to continue buprenorphine perioperatively by evaluating the total morphine milligram equivalents (MME) requirements in the first 24 hours postoperatively of patients who continued their buprenorphine therapy to those who discontinued their buprenorphine therapy perioperatively. Methods: This IRB approved study is a multicenter retrospective chart review of 80 surgical inpatients on buprenorphine prior to admission at participating sites from January 2015 to October 2022. The primary outcome is MME administered 24 hours postoperatively in patients who continued buprenorphine perioperatively versus those who discontinued buprenorphine perioperatively. Secondary efficacy outcomes included MME administered 48 and 72 hours postoperatively and daily average pain scores. Safety outcomes included rate of respiratory depression and mortality. Findings: Patients who continued buprenorphine perioperatively required significantly less MME in the first 24 hours postoperatively compared to those who discontinued buprenorphine perioperatively (median [IQR]; 23.25 [6-74.35] vs 93.38 [49.8-156.26]; P < .001). Secondary outcomes of MME administered at 48 hours (10.4 [0-40.5] vs 66.15 [27.94-143.5], P < .001) and 72 hours (0 [0-31.13] vs 66 [22.5-144], P < .001) postoperatively were also significantly less in those whose buprenorphine was continued versus those whose buprenorphine was discontinued perioperatively. Patients whose buprenorphine was continued perioperatively experienced significantly lower average pain scores at 48 (median [IQR]; 4.74 [2.9-7.08] vs 6 [4.93-7.4], P = .028) and 72 hours (3.78 [1.78-5.85] vs 5.75 [4.15-7.45], P = .002) postoperatively. Conclusion: Continuation of buprenorphine in the perioperative setting results in significantly lower utilization of MME in patients whose buprenorphine is continued compared to those whose buprenorphine is discontinued perioperatively.

Introduction: In Asian countries, warfarin is still widely used for stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation compared to non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) due to its affordability. A tool such as the SAMe-TT₂R₂ is needed to determine the probability of achieving and maintaining good anticoagulation control with warfarin therapy. However, it requires validation in the Malaysian cohort. Therefore, the objective of our study is to validate the SAMe-TT₂R₂ score in predicting poor anticoagulation control in Malaysia. A time in therapeutic range (TTR) < 65% was used to determine poor anticoagulation control. Method: This retrospective cohort study was conducted from July 2022 to July 2023. Patients were enrolled in 2020 from 49 facilities located across Malaysia resulting in a total of 957 included patients. TTR was calculated using Roseendaal's method. Results: The mean (SD) TTR and SAMe-TT₂R₂ score in the overall cohort is 65.2% (±24) and 5.5 (±0.9) respectively. Almost half of the population (43.7%) has the SAMe-TT₂R₂ score of 5. Having diabetes, ischemic heart disease, and increasing HAS-BLED and SAMe-TT₂R₂ score affects anticoagulation control on univariate analysis. However, after adjusting for demographics and clinical variables on multivariate analysis, only the SAMe-TT₂R₂ score as a continuous variable persists in predicting poor anticoagulation control. A SAMe-TT₂R₂ score cut-off point of >5 best predicts poor anticoagulation control with a sensitivity of 0.49 and a specificity value of 0.68. Conclusion: The SAMe-TT₂R₂ score, especially when exceeding 5, was associated with a higher likelihood of poor anticoagulation control, emphasizing its relevance in clinical assessment. However, its limited predictive capability, reflected by a C-statistic of 0.548, suggests the need for cautious interpretation and consideration of additional factors in anticoagulation management decisions. Continuous monitoring and personalized strategies are crucial for optimizing outcomes in this population.

Cryptosporidiosis is an infectious disease caused by the Cryptosporidium parasite, primarily affecting the gastrointestinal tract of both humans and animals. Transmission occurs via fecal-oral route, mainly through ingestion of water or food contaminated with oocysts, the parasite's infectious form. Immunocompromised individuals are particularly susceptible to severe and prolonged symptoms. Current treatment strategies involve supportive measures and antiparasitic medications such as nitazoxanide and paromomycin, although patients with predisposing factors have an elevated risk of recurrence. There is currently no evidence supporting the use of paromomycin via nasogastric tube. Therefore, we present our experience with the use of an extemporaneous paromomycin solution and its clinical impact.

Each month, subscribers to The Formulary Monograph Service receive 5 to 6 well-documented monographs on drugs that are newly released or are in late phase 3 trials. The monographs are targeted to Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committees. Subscribers also receive monthly 1-page summary monographs on agents that are useful for agendas and pharmacy/nursing in-services. A comprehensive target drug utilization evaluation/medication use evaluation (DUE/MUE) is also provided each month. With a subscription, the monographs are available online to subscribers. Monographs can be customized to meet the needs of a facility. Through the cooperation of The Formulary, Hospital Pharmacy publishes selected reviews in this column. For more information about The Formulary Monograph Service, contact Wolters Kluwer customer service at 866-397-3433.

Background: Utilization of guideline-directed medical therapy in patients hospitalized for acute heart failure is suboptimal during the hospitalization and after discharge. An inpatient heart failure order set may be a convenient and useful intervention to improve heart failure therapy in the inpatient setting. Methods: This is a retrospective study that assessed the use of an inpatient heart failure order set on pharmacologic therapy in patients hospitalized for acute heart failure from May to August 2022. Patients with heart failure with an ejection fraction less than 50% were included in the analysis. The co-primary endpoints were maintenance or optimization of guideline-directed medical therapy during the hospitalization. Results: Maintenance of guideline-directed medical therapy was significantly greater when providers used the heart failure order set (OR 2.35, 95% CI 1.03-5.33, P = .041). Optimization of guideline-directed medical therapy was also statistically greater with use of the order set (OR 11.31, 95% CI 4.37-29.31, P < .001). Conclusions: An inpatient heart failure order set may be an effective strategy to improve heart failure pharmacotherapy in patients hospitalized with acute heart failure.

Purpose. To determine if implementation of an enhanced clinical pharmacy service (ECPS) at a community hospital could improve patient experience as measured by medication-related Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) scores. Methods. A cohort study of 260 patients at a community hospital was conducted. Patients in the intervention group received additional pharmacy services from the standard of care (SOC) group, including daily medication counseling, pharmacist-driven medication administration, discharge medication reconciliation and education, consistent offers to enroll in a bedside medication delivery program (BMDP), and a telephone call following discharge. The primary outcome of patient experience was assessed through patients' responses to a care transitions HCAHPS survey question regarding understanding of the purpose of taking medications following discharge. Results. Among patients in the ECPS cohort, 75.8% had a top-box response to the care transitions HCAHPS question, compared to 63.3% of patients in the SOC cohort (OR = 1.81; 95% CI [0.61-5.37]). Top-box responses increased for all assessed HCAHPS questions but were not statistically significant. The HCAHPS survey response rate was 29.3% in the SOC cohort and 29.9% in the ECPS cohort. Conclusion. Following an ECPS intervention, patient experience as determined by HCAHPS scores increased, but the results did not reach statistical significance. Further, larger studies are needed on this topic.

Purpose: The optimal anticoagulation regimen for atrial fibrillation (AF) in critically ill patients is challenging as these patients may be at an increased risk for bleeding and clotting despite an absence or presence of anticoagulation. The purpose of this study was to compare bleeding and thrombotic rates in critically-ill adults with pre-existing AF receiving therapeutic anticoagulation versus chemical or mechanical venous thromboembolism prophylaxis. Methods: A retrospective, observational study was conducted. The primary outcome identified rate of International Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis bleeding, and secondarily assessed all venous or arterial thromboembolic events. To determine risk-factors associated with bleeding and to account for differences in baseline characteristics, a multivariable logistic regression model was used. Results: A total of 199 patients were included, 100 receiving therapeutic anticoagulation and 99 receiving venous thromboembolism prophylaxis. Patients receiving therapeutic anticoagulation compared to chemical or mechanical prophylaxis had a median (IQR) CHA₂DS₂VASc score of 4 (3-5) versus 4 (2-5) (P = .5499) and HAS-BLED score of 3 (3-4) versus 3 (2-4) (P = .0013); respectively. There was almost a threefold adjusted increased risk of bleeding in patients receiving therapeutic anticoagulation compared to venous thromboembolism prophylaxis (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.7 [95% CI 1.1-9.9]; P = .0349). One stroke occurred in a patient receiving therapeutic anticoagulation, and none occurred in patients in the prophylaxis group (P = 1.000). Conclusion: Use of therapeutic anticoagulation in critically ill patients with pre-existing AF may increase bleed rates without protecting against stroke development.