Pub Date : 2023-12-06DOI: 10.1177/00185787231213806
H. Deswal, Niti Mittal, Jyoti Kaushal, Sumit Kumar, Pankaj Kaushik
Aim: Existing gaps in nursing curriculum particularly related to medication management such as administration and monitoring increase the propensity of nurses to commit medication errors during clinical practice. The present training program was conducted with an aim to sensitize and educate undergraduate nursing students on medication errors’ related aspects. Methods: The participants were students pursuing bachelors nursing degree course (second and third year). The training “Medication errors: Role of Nurse practitioners” comprised of blended teaching methods such as theme lectures, hands on training exercises, small group case‑based learning, role plays, and nursing officer’s practical experiences. The participants’ knowledge and perception about medication errors were assessed at baseline (pre-intervention phase) and 1 week after program (post-intervention phase) with the help of a structured self-administered questionnaire in English language. Results: A total of 110 nursing students participated in the program. Post program there was a consistent increase in the number of correct responses to all knowledge-based questions with a significant improvement in knowledge scores from baseline [Baseline: (mean ± SD) 12.62 ± 2.33; Post-training: 18.52 ± 2.22; P < .001]. There was a positive change in the perception about medication errors among students. The participants rated the overall quality of program as excellent [66 (60%)] or very good [40 (36.4%)]. More than 90% agreed on its applicability in their future practice. Conclusions: The training was quite successful in educating nursing students on medication errors. There is a constant need to educate nurses and other healthcare providers including doctors and pharmacists on medication safety related aspects with an ultimate goal to improve patient safety.
{"title":"Empowering Nursing Students to Prevent Medication Error-Related Harms: A Step Toward Improving Patient Safety","authors":"H. Deswal, Niti Mittal, Jyoti Kaushal, Sumit Kumar, Pankaj Kaushik","doi":"10.1177/00185787231213806","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00185787231213806","url":null,"abstract":"Aim: Existing gaps in nursing curriculum particularly related to medication management such as administration and monitoring increase the propensity of nurses to commit medication errors during clinical practice. The present training program was conducted with an aim to sensitize and educate undergraduate nursing students on medication errors’ related aspects. Methods: The participants were students pursuing bachelors nursing degree course (second and third year). The training “Medication errors: Role of Nurse practitioners” comprised of blended teaching methods such as theme lectures, hands on training exercises, small group case‑based learning, role plays, and nursing officer’s practical experiences. The participants’ knowledge and perception about medication errors were assessed at baseline (pre-intervention phase) and 1 week after program (post-intervention phase) with the help of a structured self-administered questionnaire in English language. Results: A total of 110 nursing students participated in the program. Post program there was a consistent increase in the number of correct responses to all knowledge-based questions with a significant improvement in knowledge scores from baseline [Baseline: (mean ± SD) 12.62 ± 2.33; Post-training: 18.52 ± 2.22; P < .001]. There was a positive change in the perception about medication errors among students. The participants rated the overall quality of program as excellent [66 (60%)] or very good [40 (36.4%)]. More than 90% agreed on its applicability in their future practice. Conclusions: The training was quite successful in educating nursing students on medication errors. There is a constant need to educate nurses and other healthcare providers including doctors and pharmacists on medication safety related aspects with an ultimate goal to improve patient safety.","PeriodicalId":13002,"journal":{"name":"Hospital Pharmacy","volume":"56 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2023-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138596722","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-12-06DOI: 10.1177/00185787231212619
J. Rindone, Chadwick K. Mellen, Megan Goldenstein
Background: The PARADIGM HF trial showed sacubitril/valsartan (SV) to be superior to enalapril in patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Since its publication, several other randomized trials have compared SV to either an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) in HFrEF which showed conflicting results regarding mortality, hospitalizations, and quality of life scoring. Objective: To review randomized comparative trials of SV to either ACEI or ARB in patients with HFrEF. Methods: PubMed and Embase databases were used to identify randomized comparative trials. The text terms sacubitril, angiotensin neprilysin, and LCZ696 were used for both searches. Meta-analysis, retrospective, adhoc, and cohort studies were excluded. Results: 1476 and 3983 citations were reviewed on PubMed and Embase, respectively. Of these, 11 randomized comparative trials to either ACEI or ARB were included for analysis. The mortality/quality of life benefits of SV over enalapril in the PARADIGM HF were not corroborated in any of the other trials. The effect of hospitalizations for heart failure was inconsistent among trials. Exercise tolerance was not improved with SV versus enalapril. Conclusion: The results of the PARADIGM HF trial have largely not been confirmed in subsequent randomized comparative trials.
{"title":"Is Sacubitril/Valsartan a Superior Agent in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction? A Review of Randomized Comparative Trials","authors":"J. Rindone, Chadwick K. Mellen, Megan Goldenstein","doi":"10.1177/00185787231212619","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00185787231212619","url":null,"abstract":"Background: The PARADIGM HF trial showed sacubitril/valsartan (SV) to be superior to enalapril in patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Since its publication, several other randomized trials have compared SV to either an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) in HFrEF which showed conflicting results regarding mortality, hospitalizations, and quality of life scoring. Objective: To review randomized comparative trials of SV to either ACEI or ARB in patients with HFrEF. Methods: PubMed and Embase databases were used to identify randomized comparative trials. The text terms sacubitril, angiotensin neprilysin, and LCZ696 were used for both searches. Meta-analysis, retrospective, adhoc, and cohort studies were excluded. Results: 1476 and 3983 citations were reviewed on PubMed and Embase, respectively. Of these, 11 randomized comparative trials to either ACEI or ARB were included for analysis. The mortality/quality of life benefits of SV over enalapril in the PARADIGM HF were not corroborated in any of the other trials. The effect of hospitalizations for heart failure was inconsistent among trials. Exercise tolerance was not improved with SV versus enalapril. Conclusion: The results of the PARADIGM HF trial have largely not been confirmed in subsequent randomized comparative trials.","PeriodicalId":13002,"journal":{"name":"Hospital Pharmacy","volume":"67 31","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2023-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138594856","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-12-06DOI: 10.1177/00185787231213807
Taylor Babiarz, Justin Schmetterer, K. Merrick, Tanja Jelic, Thomas Roberts
Background: Infectious diseases (ID) pharmacists are pivotal members of antimicrobial stewardship teams. Prospective audit and feedback is a strong recommendation by The Infectious Diseases Society of America Guidelines for Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs (ASP). Utilizing customized ASP intervention documentation tools known as “ivents” in Epic, we aimed to assess the impact of interventions by measuring outcomes that were accepted compared to those that were rejected in a multihospital health system over 5 years. Methods: A multicenter, retrospective cohort study was conducted to compare clinical outcomes among intensive care unit (ICU) and non-ICU patients with accepted and rejected ASP interventions over 5 years from October 2015 to December 2020. Outcomes measured included antibiotic days of therapy per 1000 patient days (DOT/1000 PD), antibiotic doses per 1000 patient days (doses/1000 PD), hospital length of stay (LOS), in-hospital mortality, hospital-acquired Clostridioides difficile infection (HA-CDI), community-onset C. difficile infection (CO-CDI) within 30 days, and hospital readmission within 30 days. Coarsened exact matching (CEM) was used as a non-parametric matching method to balance covariates between groups and to control for confounding. Results: ASP recommendations by ID pharmacists were well-received by providers in a multihospital system over 5 years as evidenced by an overall acceptance rate of 92%. Acceptance of ASP interventions was associated with substantial reductions in antibiotic utilization without adversely affecting mortality or hospital readmissions. While high-risk C. difficile antibiotic use increased significantly due to frequent de-escalation to ceftriaxone among non-ICU patients with accepted interventions, rates of HA-CDI and CO-CDI within 30 days did not worsen. Furthermore, hospital LOS was notably shorter by an average of 1 day for non-ICU patients with accepted interventions, which resulted in substantial cost avoidance of $7 631 400. Conclusion: Collaboration with ID pharmacists to optimize antimicrobial stewardship was associated with significant reductions in antibiotic utilization, costs, and hospital LOS without worsening patient outcomes.
{"title":"Benefits of Accepting Infectious Diseases Pharmacist Recommendations: A 5-Year Outcome Study in a Multihospital System","authors":"Taylor Babiarz, Justin Schmetterer, K. Merrick, Tanja Jelic, Thomas Roberts","doi":"10.1177/00185787231213807","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00185787231213807","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Infectious diseases (ID) pharmacists are pivotal members of antimicrobial stewardship teams. Prospective audit and feedback is a strong recommendation by The Infectious Diseases Society of America Guidelines for Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs (ASP). Utilizing customized ASP intervention documentation tools known as “ivents” in Epic, we aimed to assess the impact of interventions by measuring outcomes that were accepted compared to those that were rejected in a multihospital health system over 5 years. Methods: A multicenter, retrospective cohort study was conducted to compare clinical outcomes among intensive care unit (ICU) and non-ICU patients with accepted and rejected ASP interventions over 5 years from October 2015 to December 2020. Outcomes measured included antibiotic days of therapy per 1000 patient days (DOT/1000 PD), antibiotic doses per 1000 patient days (doses/1000 PD), hospital length of stay (LOS), in-hospital mortality, hospital-acquired Clostridioides difficile infection (HA-CDI), community-onset C. difficile infection (CO-CDI) within 30 days, and hospital readmission within 30 days. Coarsened exact matching (CEM) was used as a non-parametric matching method to balance covariates between groups and to control for confounding. Results: ASP recommendations by ID pharmacists were well-received by providers in a multihospital system over 5 years as evidenced by an overall acceptance rate of 92%. Acceptance of ASP interventions was associated with substantial reductions in antibiotic utilization without adversely affecting mortality or hospital readmissions. While high-risk C. difficile antibiotic use increased significantly due to frequent de-escalation to ceftriaxone among non-ICU patients with accepted interventions, rates of HA-CDI and CO-CDI within 30 days did not worsen. Furthermore, hospital LOS was notably shorter by an average of 1 day for non-ICU patients with accepted interventions, which resulted in substantial cost avoidance of $7 631 400. Conclusion: Collaboration with ID pharmacists to optimize antimicrobial stewardship was associated with significant reductions in antibiotic utilization, costs, and hospital LOS without worsening patient outcomes.","PeriodicalId":13002,"journal":{"name":"Hospital Pharmacy","volume":"37 17","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2023-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138597838","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-29DOI: 10.1177/00185787231196770
Seif El Hadidi
{"title":"International Branch Campuses and Pharmacy Education in Low-Middle-Income Countries","authors":"Seif El Hadidi","doi":"10.1177/00185787231196770","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00185787231196770","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":13002,"journal":{"name":"Hospital Pharmacy","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2023-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139212789","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-29DOI: 10.1177/00185787231196774
Kashif Ali, Sadia Shakeel, A. K. Dhiloo, Mehwish Wajdi, Fakhsheena Anjum, S. Ansari
Background: Infections are highly susceptible in patients with hematological malignancies due to immune suppression, immunosuppressive therapies and disease progression. Rational use of antibiotics following Antimicrobial Stewardship (AMS) guidelines in early detection and response to infection is significant to improve patient care. Objectives: The present study was conducted to determine the impact of clinical pharmacists’ interventions (PIs) on antibiotics usage in hematology-oncology set up in Karachi, Pakistan. Methodology: An observational prospective study was conducted for a period of 4 months in a well-known 75-bed teaching hospital, specializing in bone marrow transplantation in Karachi, Pakistan without a structured Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs). The information was gathered from patient medical histories, laboratory, and microbiological records. Results: A total of 876 PIs (1 to 5 per patient) were implemented. Dose modifications or interval changes accounted for the major interventions (n = 190, 21.6%). The majority of all recommendations were related to antipseudomonal β-lactams, aminoglycosides, sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim and vancomycin. Overall, 94.3% (n = 876) of the 928 PIs were accepted. Conclusion: The PIs and the high physician acceptance rate may be useful for improving the safe use of antibiotics, lowering their toxicity, lowering the need for special-vigilance medications and potentially improving patient care.
{"title":"Antibiotic Stewardship: A Handshaking Strategy Among Physicians and Pharmacists to Improve therapeutic Outcomes in Hematology-Oncology","authors":"Kashif Ali, Sadia Shakeel, A. K. Dhiloo, Mehwish Wajdi, Fakhsheena Anjum, S. Ansari","doi":"10.1177/00185787231196774","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00185787231196774","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Infections are highly susceptible in patients with hematological malignancies due to immune suppression, immunosuppressive therapies and disease progression. Rational use of antibiotics following Antimicrobial Stewardship (AMS) guidelines in early detection and response to infection is significant to improve patient care. Objectives: The present study was conducted to determine the impact of clinical pharmacists’ interventions (PIs) on antibiotics usage in hematology-oncology set up in Karachi, Pakistan. Methodology: An observational prospective study was conducted for a period of 4 months in a well-known 75-bed teaching hospital, specializing in bone marrow transplantation in Karachi, Pakistan without a structured Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs). The information was gathered from patient medical histories, laboratory, and microbiological records. Results: A total of 876 PIs (1 to 5 per patient) were implemented. Dose modifications or interval changes accounted for the major interventions (n = 190, 21.6%). The majority of all recommendations were related to antipseudomonal β-lactams, aminoglycosides, sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim and vancomycin. Overall, 94.3% (n = 876) of the 928 PIs were accepted. Conclusion: The PIs and the high physician acceptance rate may be useful for improving the safe use of antibiotics, lowering their toxicity, lowering the need for special-vigilance medications and potentially improving patient care.","PeriodicalId":13002,"journal":{"name":"Hospital Pharmacy","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2023-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139210441","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-25DOI: 10.1177/00185787231212623
Geoffry A. Genna, John D. Hill, Thomas S. Achey
Grief is everywhere and affects individuals and teams in many different ways. The negative effects may not only be felt by the individual, but they can disrupt a team or an entire organization. While grief is common, understanding how to interact with others who are grieving is not. As leaders within healthcare institutions, pharmacists encounter many individuals and teams that are experiencing grief. The sources of grief can arise from pharmacy team members, other healthcare providers, patients, or our own personal experiences. This literature review introduces grief, where it comes from, and how it is emotionally and physically expressed in individuals. It discusses grief’s disruptive nature and how to effectively communicate with those grieving to limit disturbances to individual, team, and organizational performance. Understanding what grief is, how it manifests in individuals and teams, and how to navigate a grieving workplace are vital skills for pharmacy leaders and will enable a more productive workplace.
{"title":"Managing Grief for Pharmacy Leaders","authors":"Geoffry A. Genna, John D. Hill, Thomas S. Achey","doi":"10.1177/00185787231212623","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00185787231212623","url":null,"abstract":"Grief is everywhere and affects individuals and teams in many different ways. The negative effects may not only be felt by the individual, but they can disrupt a team or an entire organization. While grief is common, understanding how to interact with others who are grieving is not. As leaders within healthcare institutions, pharmacists encounter many individuals and teams that are experiencing grief. The sources of grief can arise from pharmacy team members, other healthcare providers, patients, or our own personal experiences. This literature review introduces grief, where it comes from, and how it is emotionally and physically expressed in individuals. It discusses grief’s disruptive nature and how to effectively communicate with those grieving to limit disturbances to individual, team, and organizational performance. Understanding what grief is, how it manifests in individuals and teams, and how to navigate a grieving workplace are vital skills for pharmacy leaders and will enable a more productive workplace.","PeriodicalId":13002,"journal":{"name":"Hospital Pharmacy","volume":"76 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2023-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139236245","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-25DOI: 10.1177/00185787231196763
Andrea Zovi, R. Lasala, Francesco Ferrara, Roberto Langella, Antonio Vitiello, Michela Sabbatucci, Umberto Maria Musazzi
Objectives: Migraine is a neurological disease with a high frequency of incidence. The new monoclonal antibodies selective for the calcitonin gene-related peptide and its ligand (anti-CGRP mAbs) have been marketed both in the USA and EU based on the positive efficacy results in the prevention of migraine. This search has been carried out with the aim of collecting real-world evidence on the effectiveness of anti-CGRP mAbs, performing a cost-savings analysis, and comparing performances among anti-CGRP mAbs medicines marketed in the American and European market. Methods: The literature review has been performed in PubMed database on 31 December 2022; the cost of the unitary dose of anti-CGRP mAbs has been extracted consulting an American national database. Results: The results confirm efficacy and good tolerability of anti-CGRP mAbs, determining a difference in the purchase price. In fact, all extracted studies showed a protective risk factor exposure in monthly migraine days reduction for all the anti-CGRP mAbs, whereas the cost analysis showed that using eptinezumab, in a quarter there is a cost saving of at least $425 per patient, compared with the other anti-CGRP mAbs. Conclusions: With equal efficacy and equal safety, anti-CGRP mAbs should be prescribed also regard to the cost established at the negotiation, making sure to guarantee the best treatment to the patients, but at the same time impacting as little as possible to the healthcare services resources.
{"title":"Anti-CGRP mAbs for the Preventive Treatment of Migraine: An Overview Review and a Cost Saving Analysis in the Global Scenario","authors":"Andrea Zovi, R. Lasala, Francesco Ferrara, Roberto Langella, Antonio Vitiello, Michela Sabbatucci, Umberto Maria Musazzi","doi":"10.1177/00185787231196763","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00185787231196763","url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Migraine is a neurological disease with a high frequency of incidence. The new monoclonal antibodies selective for the calcitonin gene-related peptide and its ligand (anti-CGRP mAbs) have been marketed both in the USA and EU based on the positive efficacy results in the prevention of migraine. This search has been carried out with the aim of collecting real-world evidence on the effectiveness of anti-CGRP mAbs, performing a cost-savings analysis, and comparing performances among anti-CGRP mAbs medicines marketed in the American and European market. Methods: The literature review has been performed in PubMed database on 31 December 2022; the cost of the unitary dose of anti-CGRP mAbs has been extracted consulting an American national database. Results: The results confirm efficacy and good tolerability of anti-CGRP mAbs, determining a difference in the purchase price. In fact, all extracted studies showed a protective risk factor exposure in monthly migraine days reduction for all the anti-CGRP mAbs, whereas the cost analysis showed that using eptinezumab, in a quarter there is a cost saving of at least $425 per patient, compared with the other anti-CGRP mAbs. Conclusions: With equal efficacy and equal safety, anti-CGRP mAbs should be prescribed also regard to the cost established at the negotiation, making sure to guarantee the best treatment to the patients, but at the same time impacting as little as possible to the healthcare services resources.","PeriodicalId":13002,"journal":{"name":"Hospital Pharmacy","volume":"574 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2023-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139236954","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-19DOI: 10.1177/00185787231212620
Terri L. Levien, Danial E. Baker
Each month, subscribers to The Formulary Monograph Service receive 5 to 6 well-documented monographs on drugs that are newly released or are in late phase 3 trials. The monographs are targeted to Pharmacy & Therapeutics Committees. Subscribers also receive monthly 1-page summary monographs on agents that are useful for agendas and pharmacy/nursing in-services. A comprehensive target drug utilization evaluation/medication use evaluation (DUE/MUE) is also provided each month. With a subscription, the monographs are available online to subscribers. Monographs can be customized to meet the needs of a facility. Through the cooperation of The Formulary, Hospital Pharmacy publishes selected reviews in this column. For more information about The Formulary Monograph Service, contact Wolters Kluwer customer service at 866-397-3433.
{"title":"Nirsevimab","authors":"Terri L. Levien, Danial E. Baker","doi":"10.1177/00185787231212620","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00185787231212620","url":null,"abstract":"Each month, subscribers to The Formulary Monograph Service receive 5 to 6 well-documented monographs on drugs that are newly released or are in late phase 3 trials. The monographs are targeted to Pharmacy & Therapeutics Committees. Subscribers also receive monthly 1-page summary monographs on agents that are useful for agendas and pharmacy/nursing in-services. A comprehensive target drug utilization evaluation/medication use evaluation (DUE/MUE) is also provided each month. With a subscription, the monographs are available online to subscribers. Monographs can be customized to meet the needs of a facility. Through the cooperation of The Formulary, Hospital Pharmacy publishes selected reviews in this column. For more information about The Formulary Monograph Service, contact Wolters Kluwer customer service at 866-397-3433.","PeriodicalId":13002,"journal":{"name":"Hospital Pharmacy","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2023-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139260199","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-07DOI: 10.1177/00185787231208962
Sarah Emma Berman, Lauren Lozano, Amanda Kitten, Kathleen Lusk, Crystal Franco-Martinez, Stephanie Hopper, Anand Prasad
Background: Impella devices are used for mechanical circulatory support in patients with cardiogenic shock or those undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Anticoagulation protocols in this population are not well established and are complicated by concomitant use of purge solutions containing unfractionated heparin (UFH) and intravenous UFH continuous infusion (CI) for systemic anticoagulation. Objectives: To evaluate thrombotic and bleeding complications when using a novel UFH protocol with a reduced initial UFH CI dose of 6 units/kg/hour targeting an anti-Xa goal of 0.3 to 0.5 units/mL in patients receiving Impella support. Methods: This single-center, retrospective study included 41 patients on Impella support who received an UFH purge solution and/or an IV UFH infusion. The primary outcome was overall composite bleeding. Secondary outcomes included thrombotic events and systemic UFH exposure. An exploratory analysis was performed to identify risk factors for bleeding. Results: Anti-Xa values were in therapeutic range 46% of the time while on support (interquartile range 16.6%-75%), with a median IV UFH dose of 6 units/kg/hour. The overall bleeding rate was 29.2%, with 6 minor bleeds and 2 major bleeds with no fatal bleeding or intracranial hemorrhage. Rate of overall thrombosis was 4.9%, including 1 ischemic stroke and 1 occurrence of limb ischemia. Conclusion: Use of a modified UFH protocol to target an anti-Xa goal of 0.3 to 0.5 units/mL resulted in bleeding and thrombotic event rates similar to previous literature. This protocol utilizing an initial rate of 6 units/kg/hour may be a useful approach to achieve therapeutic anticoagulation while accounting for UFH exposure from the purge solution and minimizing need for frequent calculations.
{"title":"Safety and Effectiveness of an Anti-Xa-based Unfractionated Heparin Protocol for Impella Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices","authors":"Sarah Emma Berman, Lauren Lozano, Amanda Kitten, Kathleen Lusk, Crystal Franco-Martinez, Stephanie Hopper, Anand Prasad","doi":"10.1177/00185787231208962","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00185787231208962","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Impella devices are used for mechanical circulatory support in patients with cardiogenic shock or those undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Anticoagulation protocols in this population are not well established and are complicated by concomitant use of purge solutions containing unfractionated heparin (UFH) and intravenous UFH continuous infusion (CI) for systemic anticoagulation. Objectives: To evaluate thrombotic and bleeding complications when using a novel UFH protocol with a reduced initial UFH CI dose of 6 units/kg/hour targeting an anti-Xa goal of 0.3 to 0.5 units/mL in patients receiving Impella support. Methods: This single-center, retrospective study included 41 patients on Impella support who received an UFH purge solution and/or an IV UFH infusion. The primary outcome was overall composite bleeding. Secondary outcomes included thrombotic events and systemic UFH exposure. An exploratory analysis was performed to identify risk factors for bleeding. Results: Anti-Xa values were in therapeutic range 46% of the time while on support (interquartile range 16.6%-75%), with a median IV UFH dose of 6 units/kg/hour. The overall bleeding rate was 29.2%, with 6 minor bleeds and 2 major bleeds with no fatal bleeding or intracranial hemorrhage. Rate of overall thrombosis was 4.9%, including 1 ischemic stroke and 1 occurrence of limb ischemia. Conclusion: Use of a modified UFH protocol to target an anti-Xa goal of 0.3 to 0.5 units/mL resulted in bleeding and thrombotic event rates similar to previous literature. This protocol utilizing an initial rate of 6 units/kg/hour may be a useful approach to achieve therapeutic anticoagulation while accounting for UFH exposure from the purge solution and minimizing need for frequent calculations.","PeriodicalId":13002,"journal":{"name":"Hospital Pharmacy","volume":"22 5","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135480501","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-03DOI: 10.1177/00185787231209218
Khadeijah Almarshoodi, Carlos Echevarria, Abeer Kassem, Bassam Mahboub, Laila Salameh, Chris Ward
The DECAF score (the Dyspnea, Eosinopenia, Consolidation, Academia, and Atrial fibrillation score) has been adopted in some hospitals to predict the severity of Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (AECOPD). However, DECAF score has not been widely evaluated or used in Middle Eastern countries. The present study aimed to validate the DECAF score for predicting in-hospital mortality in patients with AECOPD in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). This was a retrospective, observational study conducted in 19 hospitals in the UAE. Data were retrieved from the electronic records of patients admitted for AECOPD in 17 hospitals across the country. Patients aged more than 35 years who were diagnosed with AECOPD were included in the study. The validation of the DECAF Score for inpatient death, 30-days death, and 90-day readmission was conducted using the Area Under the Receiver Operator curve (AUROC). The AUROCDECAF curves for inpatient death, 30-days death, and 90-day readmission were 0.8 (95% CI: 0.8-0.9), 0.8 (95% CI: 0.7-0.8), and 0.8 (95% CI: 0.8-0.8), respectively. The model was a satisfactory fit to the data (Hosmer–Lemeshow statistic = 0.195, Nagelkerke R 2 = 31.7%). There were significant differences in means of length of stay across patients with different DECAF score ( P = .008). Patients with a DECAF score of 6 had the highest mean length of stay, which was 29.8 ± 31.4 days. Patients with a DECAF score of 0 had the lowest mean length of stay, which was 3.6 ± 2.0 days. The DECAF score is a strong predictive tool for inpatient death, 30 days mortality and 90-day readmission in UAE hospital settings. The DECAF score is an effective tool for predicating mortality and other disease outcomes in patients with AECOPD in the UAE; hence, clinicians would be more empowered to make appropriate clinical decisions by using the DECAF score.
{"title":"An International Validation of the “DECAF Score” to Predict Disease Severity and Hospital Mortality in Acute Exacerbation of COPD in the UAE","authors":"Khadeijah Almarshoodi, Carlos Echevarria, Abeer Kassem, Bassam Mahboub, Laila Salameh, Chris Ward","doi":"10.1177/00185787231209218","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00185787231209218","url":null,"abstract":"The DECAF score (the Dyspnea, Eosinopenia, Consolidation, Academia, and Atrial fibrillation score) has been adopted in some hospitals to predict the severity of Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (AECOPD). However, DECAF score has not been widely evaluated or used in Middle Eastern countries. The present study aimed to validate the DECAF score for predicting in-hospital mortality in patients with AECOPD in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). This was a retrospective, observational study conducted in 19 hospitals in the UAE. Data were retrieved from the electronic records of patients admitted for AECOPD in 17 hospitals across the country. Patients aged more than 35 years who were diagnosed with AECOPD were included in the study. The validation of the DECAF Score for inpatient death, 30-days death, and 90-day readmission was conducted using the Area Under the Receiver Operator curve (AUROC). The AUROCDECAF curves for inpatient death, 30-days death, and 90-day readmission were 0.8 (95% CI: 0.8-0.9), 0.8 (95% CI: 0.7-0.8), and 0.8 (95% CI: 0.8-0.8), respectively. The model was a satisfactory fit to the data (Hosmer–Lemeshow statistic = 0.195, Nagelkerke R 2 = 31.7%). There were significant differences in means of length of stay across patients with different DECAF score ( P = .008). Patients with a DECAF score of 6 had the highest mean length of stay, which was 29.8 ± 31.4 days. Patients with a DECAF score of 0 had the lowest mean length of stay, which was 3.6 ± 2.0 days. The DECAF score is a strong predictive tool for inpatient death, 30 days mortality and 90-day readmission in UAE hospital settings. The DECAF score is an effective tool for predicating mortality and other disease outcomes in patients with AECOPD in the UAE; hence, clinicians would be more empowered to make appropriate clinical decisions by using the DECAF score.","PeriodicalId":13002,"journal":{"name":"Hospital Pharmacy","volume":"18 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135821267","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：