<p>The modern use of medicines to treat anxiety began in the 1930s when barbiturates began to take over from bromide salts for tranquilisation on the grounds of improved tolerability [Glatt <span>1962</span>]. Their use expanded after World War Two, often in combination with amphetamines (e.g., ‘Purple Hearts’), until in the 1960s concerns about their toxicity in accidental overdose (e.g., the case of the actress Marilyn Monroe) plus dependence, led to the search for safer alternatives. As a medical student in Guy's hospital in the early 1970s my interest in psychiatry was boosted by caring for several barbiturate-dependent patients undergoing withdrawal, and being intrigued by their florid hallucinations and delusions. Barbiturate replacements included methaqualone, glutethimide and clomethiazole, but these too had issues of overdose toxicity, dependence and withdrawal [Cowen and Nutt <span>1982</span>]. In the early 1970s barbiturates were sufficiently commonly prescribed for a national campaign to stop them being instigated with the rather clever acronym CURB (Campaign to Use Restrict Barbiturates). This succeeded largely because much safer alternatives were becoming available in the 1960s - the benzodiazepines such as diazepam and chlordiazepoxide. These became the dominant anxiolytic (and hypnotic) medicines for the ensuing 3 decades because they were effective, generally well tolerated and it was virtually impossible to die from a benzodiazepine-alone overdose.</p><p>In parallel with the discovery of the benzodiazepines in the 1950s was a less obvious but eventually more significant development for anxiety treatments—the discovery of the monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) such as phenelzine and the tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) such as imipramine [see footnote]. Although the MAOIs were developed for depression, UK psychiatrists of the St Thomas' school of William Sargant observed they had powerful anti-phobic effects, for example they could treat agoraphobia [Sargant and Dally <span>1962</span>]. However the (exaggerated) fear of toxicity of MAOIs, the need for dietary control (to avoid the tyramine ‘cheese’ reaction) plus their delayed onset of action made them much less easy to use than the benzodiazepines, which worked almost immediately. The use of MAOIs became limited to specialist centres whereas benzodiazepines became widely used especially in primary care.</p><p>Efficacy of TCAs for anxiety came in the early 1960s by Klein and Fink in the USA. Whilst exploring the efficacy of imipramine across several psychiatric disorders, and confirming its value in depression, they also noted a powerful effect on sudden anxiety attacks, but not on persistent worry [Klein and Fink <span>1962</span>]. From this they suggested there were two types of anxiety: panic anxiety which responded to imipramine, and generalised anxiety which did not, but did respond to benzodiazepines. Despite hostile resistance by some UK ‘experts’ to this concept it h
现代药物治疗焦虑始于20世纪30年代,当时巴比妥酸盐开始取代溴化盐用于镇静,因为耐受性得到改善[Glatt 1962]。第二次世界大战后,它们的使用扩大了,通常与安非他命(如“紫心”)一起使用,直到20世纪60年代,人们担心它们在意外过量时的毒性(如女演员玛丽莲·梦露的案例)以及依赖性,导致人们寻找更安全的替代品。20世纪70年代初,作为盖伊医院的一名医学生,我对精神病学的兴趣因照顾几名戒断的巴比妥类药物依赖患者而增强,并被他们华丽的幻觉和妄想所吸引。巴比妥酸盐替代品包括甲喹酮、谷胱甘胺和氯美唑,但这些药物也存在过量毒性、依赖性和戒断的问题[Cowen和Nutt 1982]。在20世纪70年代早期,巴比妥类药物被广泛使用,以至于一场全国性的运动以一个相当聪明的首字母缩略词“CURB”(限制使用巴比妥类药物的运动)来阻止它们的使用。这在很大程度上取得了成功,因为20世纪60年代出现了更安全的替代品——苯二氮卓类药物,如地西泮和氯二氮环氧化物。在接下来的30年里,这些药物成为主要的抗焦虑(和催眠)药物,因为它们有效,通常耐受性良好,而且几乎不可能死于单独服用苯二氮卓类药物过量。与20世纪50年代苯二氮卓类药物的发现同时出现的还有一个不那么明显但最终更为重要的焦虑治疗进展——单胺氧化酶抑制剂(MAOIs)如苯肼和三环抗抑郁药(TCAs)如丙咪嗪的发现(见脚注)。尽管MAOIs是为抑郁症开发的,William Sargant的圣托马斯学校的英国精神病学家观察到它们具有强大的抗恐惧作用,例如它们可以治疗广场恐惧症[Sargant和Dally 1962]。然而,对MAOIs毒性的(夸大的)恐惧,对饮食控制的需要(以避免酪胺“奶酪”反应)以及它们的延迟起效使得它们比苯二氮卓类药物更不容易使用,后者几乎立即起作用。MAOIs的使用仅限于专科中心,而苯二氮卓类药物则被广泛使用,特别是在初级保健中。在20世纪60年代初,美国的Klein和Fink发现了tca对焦虑的疗效。在探索丙咪嗪对几种精神疾病的疗效,并证实其对抑郁症的治疗价值的同时,他们还注意到丙咪嗪对突然的焦虑发作有强大的作用,但对持续的担忧没有作用[Klein和Fink 1962]。由此,他们提出了两种类型的焦虑:对丙咪嗪有反应的恐慌性焦虑,以及对苯二氮卓类药物没有反应的广泛性焦虑。尽管一些英国“专家”对这一概念怀有敌意,但它现在已被普遍接受。起初,人们认为苯二氮平类药物对恐慌症无效,但后来,苯二氮平类药物比地西泮更有效,特别是阿普唑仑和氯硝西泮,经测试发现有效。1981年,阿普唑仑(“Xanax”)在美国和后来的英国被批准用于治疗恐慌症,尽管它从未在国民健康服务体系中可用。大约在这个时候,苯二氮卓类药物、巴比妥类药物和相关药物(包括溴化物)的作用机制被确定为GABA的增强,GABA是大脑的抑制性(因此是镇静)神经递质[Nutt和Malizia 2001]。到20世纪70年代初,人们已经了解了MAOIs(单胺氧化酶抑制)和TCAs(单胺再摄取阻断)的药理学机制:两者都增加了突触中的单胺水平。这一发现引发了一波新的研究浪潮,以发现具有类似机制的新(可申请专利的)药物。在MAOI类中,重要的发展是moclobemide,它是第一个亚型选择性抑制剂:它只作用于酶的MAO-A亚型。这种选择性降低了饮食相互作用的风险,提高了总体耐受性。早在20世纪80年代,巴西的Versiani及其同事就已经很好地确立了老年MAOIs在社交恐惧症(现更名为社交焦虑症)中的效用,他们随后发现莫氯比胺同样有效[Versiani等人,1992],从此莫氯比胺成为第一种专门批准用于社交焦虑症的药物。丙咪嗪在20世纪70年代发展成为更具选择性的单胺再摄取阻断tca,具有更多的血清素选择性,如氯丙咪嗪和更多的去甲肾上腺素选择性,如地西帕明。随后,新的非三环化学支架选择性药物出现:选择性血清素再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs)和去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂瑞波西汀(reboxetine)。 这些新药的安全性和耐受性的提高,尤其是ssri类药物,改变了英国精神疾病的治疗模式,大多数抑郁症患者由全科医生治疗,而不是精神病治疗。丙咪嗪阻断了血清素和去甲肾上腺素的再摄取作用,这一事实提出了一个问题:是哪一种,还是两者都有?-可能是它对恐慌症的影响。当发现ssri类药物与丙咪嗪一样有效且更容易使用时,这个问题得到了解决,其中一些药物获得了上市许可。事实上,帕罗西汀是英国第一个被批准用于治疗恐慌症的药物,而丙咪嗪从未被批准。随后,各种SSRIs被发现对OCD, SAnD, GAD和PTSD有效,其中一些获得许可。BAP [Baldwin et al. 2014]和NICE焦虑指南现在都推荐它们作为大多数焦虑症的一线药物治疗,而不是苯二氮卓类药物。随后又出现了一些影响较小的事态发展。首先是5-羟色胺5-HT1A受体激动剂,如丁螺环酮(英国/美国)和坦多螺环酮(日本),它们对广泛性焦虑症(GAD)有效,但对其他焦虑症无效[Baldwin et al. 2014]。加巴喷丁及其衍生物普瑞巴林被开发为“促进GABA”的癫痫药物,随后被发现对广泛性焦虑症有用[Baldwin et al. 2014]。事实证明,这两种药物(gabapentanoids)的名字是错误的,因为它们不通过GABA起作用,而是阻断钙通道。普瑞巴林现在被广泛使用,被认为是苯二氮卓类药物更安全的替代品,尽管有证据表明,它实际上可能更有问题,尤其是与阿片类药物一起使用时。那么未来会怎样呢?自从苯二氮卓类药物在1980年被发现有自己的结合位点以来,GABA的神经科学已经有了惊人的发展。目前,在哺乳动物大脑中已经鉴定出超过16种GABA-A受体亚基,每种亚基具有不同的位置和功能。α -2和α -3亚型被认为是苯二氮卓类药物治疗效果的主要介质[Nutt和Malizia 2001]。然而,目前所有抗焦虑类苯二氮卓类药物也激活α 1亚型,该亚型介导苯二氮卓类药物的镇静和强化作用以及耐受性和戒断的发展。因此,目前针对GABA治疗焦虑的研究主要集中在选择性α 2和α 3亚型的药物上,α -1没有或只有很少的活性。已经开发了几种药物,目前的主要候选药物是darigabat (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04244175)。另一个GABA靶点是神经类固醇受体。一种激动剂是fasedienol,它正在开发中,作为一种“prn”(按需)治疗表现焦虑(Monti et al. 2024)。它是通过鼻腔服用的,它会激活投射到杏仁核的神经,导致那里释放伽马氨基丁酸。最后,几家公司正在探索胆碱能尼古丁α -7药物作为速效抗焦虑药,基于数据显示杏仁核中的这些受体也在焦虑控制中发挥作用(He et al. 2025)。丙咪嗪是由20世纪40年代发现的异丙嗪等三环结构的抗组胺分子发展而来的。这些抗组胺药中有几种仍被用作镇静剂和镇静剂(特别是儿童),没有现代水平的试验证据。首先,羟嗪在一项安慰剂对照研究中被证明对广泛性焦虑症有效https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15949921/尽管该适应症在英国没有上市许可。作者声
{"title":"Medicines for Anxiety: A Hundred Years of Tranquillity and More to Come?","authors":"David Nutt","doi":"10.1002/hup.70034","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/hup.70034","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The modern use of medicines to treat anxiety began in the 1930s when barbiturates began to take over from bromide salts for tranquilisation on the grounds of improved tolerability [Glatt <span>1962</span>]. Their use expanded after World War Two, often in combination with amphetamines (e.g., ‘Purple Hearts’), until in the 1960s concerns about their toxicity in accidental overdose (e.g., the case of the actress Marilyn Monroe) plus dependence, led to the search for safer alternatives. As a medical student in Guy's hospital in the early 1970s my interest in psychiatry was boosted by caring for several barbiturate-dependent patients undergoing withdrawal, and being intrigued by their florid hallucinations and delusions. Barbiturate replacements included methaqualone, glutethimide and clomethiazole, but these too had issues of overdose toxicity, dependence and withdrawal [Cowen and Nutt <span>1982</span>]. In the early 1970s barbiturates were sufficiently commonly prescribed for a national campaign to stop them being instigated with the rather clever acronym CURB (Campaign to Use Restrict Barbiturates). This succeeded largely because much safer alternatives were becoming available in the 1960s - the benzodiazepines such as diazepam and chlordiazepoxide. These became the dominant anxiolytic (and hypnotic) medicines for the ensuing 3 decades because they were effective, generally well tolerated and it was virtually impossible to die from a benzodiazepine-alone overdose.</p><p>In parallel with the discovery of the benzodiazepines in the 1950s was a less obvious but eventually more significant development for anxiety treatments—the discovery of the monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) such as phenelzine and the tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) such as imipramine [see footnote]. Although the MAOIs were developed for depression, UK psychiatrists of the St Thomas' school of William Sargant observed they had powerful anti-phobic effects, for example they could treat agoraphobia [Sargant and Dally <span>1962</span>]. However the (exaggerated) fear of toxicity of MAOIs, the need for dietary control (to avoid the tyramine ‘cheese’ reaction) plus their delayed onset of action made them much less easy to use than the benzodiazepines, which worked almost immediately. The use of MAOIs became limited to specialist centres whereas benzodiazepines became widely used especially in primary care.</p><p>Efficacy of TCAs for anxiety came in the early 1960s by Klein and Fink in the USA. Whilst exploring the efficacy of imipramine across several psychiatric disorders, and confirming its value in depression, they also noted a powerful effect on sudden anxiety attacks, but not on persistent worry [Klein and Fink <span>1962</span>]. From this they suggested there were two types of anxiety: panic anxiety which responded to imipramine, and generalised anxiety which did not, but did respond to benzodiazepines. Despite hostile resistance by some UK ‘experts’ to this concept it h","PeriodicalId":13030,"journal":{"name":"Human Psychopharmacology: Clinical and Experimental","volume":"41 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hup.70034","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146256493","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}