Human pathology最新文献

Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is the most common soft tissue sarcoma in children and adolescents under the age of 20. The current World Health Organization (WHO) classification for soft tissue and bone tumors recognizes 4 distinct subtypes of RMS based on clinicopathological and molecular genetic features: embryonal, alveolar, spindle cell/sclerosing and pleomorphic subtypes. However, with the increased use of molecular techniques, the classification of rhabdomyosarcoma has been evolving rapidly. New subtypes such as osseus RMS harboring TFCP2/NCOA2 fusions or RMS arising in inflammatory rhabdomyoblastic tumor have been emerging within the last decade, adding to the complexity of diagnosing skeletal muscle tumors. This review article provides an overview of classically recognized distinctive subtypes as well as new, evolving subtypes and discusses important morphologic, immunophenotypic and molecular genetic features of each subtype including recommendations for a diagnostic approach of malignant skeletal muscle neoplasms.

Dedifferentiation traditionally is defined by descriptive criteria as a tumor showing an abrupt change in histology from a conventional, classic, low-grade appearing neoplasm to a tumor that is more cellular, pleomorphic and “high grade”, with grading typically being performed by subjective criteria. The dedifferentiated areas range from areas with recognizable histologic differentiation which differs from the primary tumor (such as an osteosarcoma arising from a low-grade chondrosarcoma) to areas containing sarcomas without specific histologic differentiation (such as pleomorphic or spindle cell sarcoma). Many, but not all, dedifferentiated tumors are aggressive and associated with significantly shorter survival than their conventional counterparts, even grade 3 conventional tumors. As a result, dedifferentiated tumors are generally considered to be clinically aggressive and as a result, more aggressive surgery or the addition of (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy is often considered. However, long-term (greater than 20 year) survivors are reported in the most common dedifferentiated bone and soft tissue sarcomas. Moreover, use of mitotic criterion for defining dedifferentiation in dedifferentiated liposarcoma as well as grading (by the French system) have been found to be associated with survival. This paper reviews the literature on dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma, dedifferentiated liposarcoma, dedifferentiated chordoma and dedifferentiated parosteal osteosarcoma. As a result of that review, recommendations are advocated to identify evidence-based, objective diagnostic and grading criteria for dedifferentiation that are appropriate for each tumor type. Adding such criteria will improve consistency in diagnosis worldwide, allow easier comparison of clinical research performed on dedifferentiated tumors and help communicate (to patients and clinicians) the tumors with highest risk of clinically aggressive behavior, to allow appropriate and personalized treatment planning.

There is no shortage of comprehensive review articles on bone and soft tissue pathology, almost always representing a regurgitation of the literature with little to no guidance on personal “best practices,” recommended applications of ancillary testing, and alternative points of view. This special issue of Human Pathology uniquely unites evidence-based medicine, where appropriate, with the collective personal experiences of a wide range of accomplished pathologists from varying institutions and backgrounds, addressing problematic areas, updated and sometimes imperfect classification systems, and their personal preferences for cost-effectively incorporating ancillary testing. For the preponderance of general pathologists (and specialists), whether academic or non-academic, non-neoplastic musculoskeletal diseases represent a far higher percentage of their practice than bone and soft tissue neoplasia. One of the most common frozen sections performed at many hospitals throughout the USA is revision arthroplasty, relying on the pathologist to help determine the presence (or absence) of periprosthetic joint infection, largely based on the hematoxylin & eosin (H&E) slide. Not every institution has access to the latest molecular techniques; fortunately, many of the current immunohistochemical antibodies serve as reliable surrogate markers of genetic mutations, allowing for cheaper but accurate diagnoses, when deemed necessary. Furthermore, molecular testing is often not necessary to establish a specific diagnosis, even among neoplasms with known underlying genetic abnormalities. It must be remembered that most bone and soft tissue tumors were recognized and classified correctly, before we uncovered and understood, among a subset, their underlying and unique molecular aberrations. Perhaps not surprisingly, in some cases, more than one molecular pathway may lead to the same histologic tumor subtype. Less commonly, an identical genetic driver/fusion may result in immunophenotypically and biologically distinct neoplasms, sometimes with entirely different clinical behaviors. “Dedifferentiation,” a concept recognized among a variety of bone and soft tissue neoplasms, including but not limited to chondrosarcoma, parosteal osteosarcoma, and liposarcoma, needs to be objectively reassessed, particularly for liposarcoma. The following reviews attempt to address the above concepts, re-emphasizing the important role the practicing pathologist continues to (and must) play in the differential diagnoses of neoplastic and non-neoplastic musculoskeletal diseases.

Soft tissue tumors form part of a challenging domain in diagnostic pathology owing to their comparative rarity, astonishing histologic diversity, and overlap between entities. Many of these tumors are now known to be defined by highly recurrent, or, in some instances, unique molecular alterations. Insights from gene profiling continue to elucidate the wider molecular landscape of soft tissue tumors; many of these advances have been co-opted by immunohistochemistry (IHC) for diagnostic applications. There now exists a multitude of antibodies serving as surrogate markers of recurrent gene fusions, amplifications, and point mutations, which, in certain settings, can replace the need for more resource and time-intensive cytogenetic and molecular genetic analyses. IHC presents many advantages including rapid turnaround time, cost-effectiveness, and interpretative reproducibility. A sensible application of these immunohistochemical markers complemented by a working knowledge of the molecular pathogenesis of bone and soft tissue tumors permits accurate diagnosis in the majority of cases. In this review, we will outline some of these biomarkers while emphasizing molecular correlates and highlighting interpretative challenges and pitfalls.

Bone and soft tissue tumors (BST) are a highly heterogeneous group largely classified by their line of differentiation, based on their resemblance to their normal counterpart in adult tissue. Yet, rendering a specific diagnosis can be challenging, primarily due to their rarity and overlapping histopathologic features or clinical presentations. Over the past few decades, seemingly histogenetic-specific gene fusions/translocations and amplifications have been discovered, aiding in a more nuanced classification, leading to well-established objective diagnostic criteria and the development of specific surrogate ancillary tests targeting these genetic aberrations (e.g., immunohistochemistry). Ironically, the same research also has revealed that some specific tumor subtypes may be the result of differing and often multiple gene fusions/translocations, but, more interestingly, identical gene fusions may be present in more than one phenotypically and biologically distinct neoplasm, sometimes with entirely different clinical behavior. Prime examples include, EWSR1::ATF1 and, less commonly, EWSR1::CREB1 gene fusions present in both clear cell sarcoma, a malignant high-grade tumor with melanocytic differentiation, and angiomatoid fibrous histiocytoma, a mesenchymal neoplasm of intermediate malignancy with a generally indolent course. Similarly, MDM2 amplification, once deemed to be pathognomonic for atypical lipomatous tumor/well differentiated and dedifferentiated liposarcoma, has been documented in a range of additional distinct tumors, including low grade osteosarcomas (e.g. low grade central and surface parosteal) and high-grade intimal sarcomas, amongst others. Such findings reinforce the importance of careful attention to morphological and clinicoradiological features and correlation with molecular testing before rendering a specific diagnosis. Future classification systems in BST neoplasms cannot be solely based on molecular events and ideally will balance morphologic features with molecular analysis. Herein, we provide a narrative literature review of the more common BST neoplasms with shared genetic events but differing demographics, morphology, immunophenotype, and clinical behavior, re-emphasizing the importance of the hematoxylin and eosin slide and the “eye” of the practicing pathologist.

Technological and implant design advances have helped reduce the frequency of aseptic total joint arthroplasty failure, but periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) remain a clinical important problem with high patient morbidity. Misinterpreting PJI as aseptic mechanical loosening commonly leads to unsatisfactory revision arthroplasty, persistent infection, and poor long-term results. While there is no single “gold standard” diagnostic test for PJI, recent collaborative efforts by Orthopaedic and Infectious Disease Societies have developed algorithms for diagnosing PJI. However, the efficacy of individual tests as well as diagnostic thresholds are controversial. We review the recommended thresholds for commonly used screening tests as well as tissue histopathology and confirmatory tests to diagnose periprosthetic infection. We also update lesser-known laboratory tests, and we briefly summarize rapidly evolving molecular tests to diagnose periprosthetic infection. Pathologists hold a critical role in assisting with PJI diagnosis, maintaining laboratory test quality and interpreting test results. Collaboration between clinicians and pathologists is essential to provide optimal patient care and reduce the burden of PJI.

Extragonadal germ cell tumors (EGCTs) are rare, representing <5% of all germ cell tumors (GCTs). Whilst EGCTs share morphological and immunohistochemical features with their gonadal counterparts, they tend to be more aggressive and are frequently associated with secondary somatic malignancies. The aim of our study was to evaluate the clinical, morphological and immunohistochemical features, and to analyze tumors for chromosomal abnormalities of 12p, in addition to any novel genetic alterations, in a series of EGCTs. Seventy-seven EGCTs were included. Anterior mediastinum was the most common anatomic site, followed by central nervous system, retroperitoneum, sacroccygeal area, and neck. Whole genome SNP array identified isochromosome 12p in 26% of tumors. Additional cytogenetic abnormalities included the presence of gain of chr 21 in 37% of tumors. Somatic-type malignancies were identified in 8% of patients. Disease progression (metastasis and/or recurrence) was documented in 8 patients, most of whom died from their relapse. Three patients who died of disease had somatic-type malignancies. Mediastinal seminomas had a significantly better overall survival when compared to mediastinal non-seminomatous GCTs. Our study demonstrates that EGCTs share similar histologic features, but diverse clinical outcomes compared to their gonadal counterparts. Outcomes vary according to anatomic location and histologic subtypes. Our data corroborate that somatic-type malignancies are frequently encountered in mediastinal EGCTs and that their presence portends a poorer prognosis.