首页 > 最新文献

Hernia最新文献

英文 中文
Ultrasound-guided ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric nerve block with local anesthesia and fentanyl analgesia versus local anesthesia and fentanyl analgesia prior to Shouldice inguinal hernia repair in adults: a retrospective matched-pair analysis among 100 individuals. 成人肩胛腹股沟疝修补术前超声引导下髂腹股沟-髂腹股沟神经阻滞伴局部麻醉和芬太尼镇痛与局部麻醉和芬太尼镇痛的对比:对 100 人进行的回顾性配对分析。
IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-02 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-024-03101-0
Marguerite Mainprize, Anton Svendrovski, Gloria Galant, Darren Ezer, Robert Hall, Christoph Paasch

Purpose: There is limited research on the impact of an ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric nerve block on intraoperative opioid consumption when conducting groin hernia repair in adults. Thus, the aim was to evaluate ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric nerve block for groin hernia patients at Shouldice Hospital.

Methods: The study was a pilot retrospective chart review on patients who underwent a Shouldice Repair from November 2023 to December 2023. This study compared individuals receiving an ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric nerve block with local anesthesia and fentanyl analgesia to those who received local anesthesia and fentanyl analgesia, by manually matching 1:1 on 12 demographic and intraoperative characteristics. Comparison between groups was performed using chi-square/Fisher Exact test for categorical and t-test/Mann-Whitney test for numerical variables depending on data distribution. Multivariable regression analysis was used to examine predictors of intraoperative use of fentanyl.

Results: In this study 50 matched pairs of unilateral primary inguinal hernia patients were analyzed. The ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric nerve block patients had lower recorded intraoperative fentanyl (85mcg less than control, p < .001) and dimenhydrinate (13 mg less than control, p < .001) than the control group patients. No differences were found in postoperative day 0 to 3 for acetaminophen, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, and opioid consumption between the patients who did receive an ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric nerve block prior to surgery and those that did not.

Conclusion: The administration of an ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric nerve block prior to primary inguinal hernia repair using a Shouldice Repair is associated with a significantly lower intraoperative fentanyl consumption compared to non-administration.

目的:在成人腹股沟疝修补术中,髂腹股沟-髂腹股沟神经阻滞对术中阿片类药物消耗量的影响研究有限。因此,本研究旨在评估肩关节医院腹股沟疝患者的髂腹股沟-髂腹股沟神经阻滞情况:本研究是一项试验性回顾性病历审查,对象是 2023 年 11 月至 2023 年 12 月期间接受 Shouldice 修补术的患者。该研究将接受髂腹股沟-髂腹股沟神经阻滞、局部麻醉和芬太尼镇痛的患者与接受局部麻醉和芬太尼镇痛的患者进行了比较,就 12 项人口统计学特征和术中特征进行了 1:1 的人工匹配。根据数据分布情况,对分类变量采用卡方检验/费舍尔精确检验,对数字变量采用t检验/曼-惠特尼检验进行组间比较。多变量回归分析用于研究术中使用芬太尼的预测因素:本研究分析了 50 对匹配的单侧原发性腹股沟疝患者。髂腹股沟神经-髂腹股沟神经阻滞患者的术中芬太尼记录较低(比对照组低 85 毫微克,P 结论:髂腹股沟神经-髂腹股沟神经阻滞患者的术中芬太尼记录较低,比对照组低 85 毫微克:在使用肩胛骨修补术进行原发性腹股沟疝修补术前进行髂腹股沟-髂腹股沟神经阻滞与不进行髂腹股沟-髂腹股沟神经阻滞相比,术中芬太尼消耗量显著降低。
{"title":"Ultrasound-guided ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric nerve block with local anesthesia and fentanyl analgesia versus local anesthesia and fentanyl analgesia prior to Shouldice inguinal hernia repair in adults: a retrospective matched-pair analysis among 100 individuals.","authors":"Marguerite Mainprize, Anton Svendrovski, Gloria Galant, Darren Ezer, Robert Hall, Christoph Paasch","doi":"10.1007/s10029-024-03101-0","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10029-024-03101-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>There is limited research on the impact of an ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric nerve block on intraoperative opioid consumption when conducting groin hernia repair in adults. Thus, the aim was to evaluate ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric nerve block for groin hernia patients at Shouldice Hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was a pilot retrospective chart review on patients who underwent a Shouldice Repair from November 2023 to December 2023. This study compared individuals receiving an ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric nerve block with local anesthesia and fentanyl analgesia to those who received local anesthesia and fentanyl analgesia, by manually matching 1:1 on 12 demographic and intraoperative characteristics. Comparison between groups was performed using chi-square/Fisher Exact test for categorical and t-test/Mann-Whitney test for numerical variables depending on data distribution. Multivariable regression analysis was used to examine predictors of intraoperative use of fentanyl.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study 50 matched pairs of unilateral primary inguinal hernia patients were analyzed. The ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric nerve block patients had lower recorded intraoperative fentanyl (85mcg less than control, p < .001) and dimenhydrinate (13 mg less than control, p < .001) than the control group patients. No differences were found in postoperative day 0 to 3 for acetaminophen, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, and opioid consumption between the patients who did receive an ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric nerve block prior to surgery and those that did not.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The administration of an ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric nerve block prior to primary inguinal hernia repair using a Shouldice Repair is associated with a significantly lower intraoperative fentanyl consumption compared to non-administration.</p>","PeriodicalId":13168,"journal":{"name":"Hernia","volume":" ","pages":"1849-1854"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141878575","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparative analysis of robotic and laparoscopic techniques in hiatal hernia and crural repair: a review of current evidence and outcomes. 食管裂孔疝和嵴修补术中机器人和腹腔镜技术的比较分析:当前证据和结果综述。
IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-10 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-024-03126-5
I Karikis, N Pachos, E Mela, K Saliaris, E Kitsou, D Linardoutsos, S Triantafyllou, D Theodorou

Purpose: The purpose of this narrative review is to evaluate the implementation of robotic surgery in hiatal hernia and crural repair, based on the existing literature and to compare this approach to other established techniques.

Methods: We performed a non- systematic literature search of PubMed and MEDLINE on February 25, 2024 for papers published to date focusing on the surgical repair of hiatal hernias using the robotic platform. After eliminating publications based on eligibility criteria, 13 studies were selected for analysis.

Results: Robotic surgery is increasingly utilized in hiatal hernia repair due to its enhanced ergonomics and superior visualization capabilities. Operative times vary, with some studies indicating longer durations for robotic surgery (e.g., Giovannetti et al. demonstrated median operative time of 196 min for robotic compared to 145 min for laparoscopic) while others report shorter times (e.g., Lang F et al. demonstrated 88 min for robotic versus 102 min for laparoscopic). Recurrence rates between robotic and laparoscopic repairs are comparable, with reported recurrence rates of 1.8% for robotic and 1.2% for laparoscopic approaches by Benedix et al. Robotic surgery offers potential advantages, including reduced intraoperative blood loss (e.g., Giovannetti et al. mentioned median blood loss of 20 ml for robotic versus 50 ml for laparoscopic). The length of hospital stay and postoperative complication rates also vary, with some studies suggesting shorter stays and fewer complications for robotic surgery as surgeons become more proficient. Soliman et al. reported a statistically significant reduction in complication rates with robotic surgery (6.3% versus 19.2%).

Conclusions: Robotic surgery presents promising results regarding the length of hospital stay, conversion rate to open surgery and postoperative complication rates when compared to laparoscopy based on the existing literature. Despite the lack of striking differences, robotic hiatal hernia repair is a valid and evolving approach.

目的:这篇叙述性综述的目的是根据现有文献评估机器人手术在食管裂孔疝和嵴修补术中的应用情况,并将这种方法与其他成熟技术进行比较:我们于 2024 年 2 月 25 日在 PubMed 和 MEDLINE 上进行了非系统性文献检索,检索迄今为止发表的使用机器人平台进行食管裂孔疝手术修复的论文。根据资格标准剔除文献后,选出 13 项研究进行分析:结果:由于机器人手术符合人体工程学并具有卓越的可视化能力,因此越来越多地应用于食管裂孔疝修补术中。手术时间各不相同,一些研究表明机器人手术时间更长(例如,Giovannetti 等人的研究表明机器人手术的中位手术时间为 196 分钟,而腹腔镜手术为 145 分钟),而另一些研究报告的手术时间更短(例如,Lang F 等人的研究表明机器人手术为 88 分钟,而腹腔镜手术为 102 分钟)。机器人手术和腹腔镜修复术的复发率相当,据 Benedix 等人报道,机器人手术的复发率为 1.8%,腹腔镜手术为 1.2%。机器人手术具有潜在的优势,包括减少术中失血(例如,Giovannetti 等人提到机器人手术的中位失血量为 20 毫升,而腹腔镜手术为 50 毫升)。住院时间和术后并发症发生率也不尽相同,一些研究表明,随着外科医生技术越来越熟练,机器人手术的住院时间更短,并发症更少。Soliman等人报告称,机器人手术的并发症发生率在统计学上有显著降低(6.3%对19.2%):根据现有文献,与腹腔镜手术相比,机器人手术在住院时间、转为开腹手术率和术后并发症发生率方面都有良好的效果。尽管缺乏显著差异,但机器人食管裂孔疝修补术是一种有效且不断发展的方法。
{"title":"Comparative analysis of robotic and laparoscopic techniques in hiatal hernia and crural repair: a review of current evidence and outcomes.","authors":"I Karikis, N Pachos, E Mela, K Saliaris, E Kitsou, D Linardoutsos, S Triantafyllou, D Theodorou","doi":"10.1007/s10029-024-03126-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10029-024-03126-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this narrative review is to evaluate the implementation of robotic surgery in hiatal hernia and crural repair, based on the existing literature and to compare this approach to other established techniques.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a non- systematic literature search of PubMed and MEDLINE on February 25, 2024 for papers published to date focusing on the surgical repair of hiatal hernias using the robotic platform. After eliminating publications based on eligibility criteria, 13 studies were selected for analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Robotic surgery is increasingly utilized in hiatal hernia repair due to its enhanced ergonomics and superior visualization capabilities. Operative times vary, with some studies indicating longer durations for robotic surgery (e.g., Giovannetti et al. demonstrated median operative time of 196 min for robotic compared to 145 min for laparoscopic) while others report shorter times (e.g., Lang F et al. demonstrated 88 min for robotic versus 102 min for laparoscopic). Recurrence rates between robotic and laparoscopic repairs are comparable, with reported recurrence rates of 1.8% for robotic and 1.2% for laparoscopic approaches by Benedix et al. Robotic surgery offers potential advantages, including reduced intraoperative blood loss (e.g., Giovannetti et al. mentioned median blood loss of 20 ml for robotic versus 50 ml for laparoscopic). The length of hospital stay and postoperative complication rates also vary, with some studies suggesting shorter stays and fewer complications for robotic surgery as surgeons become more proficient. Soliman et al. reported a statistically significant reduction in complication rates with robotic surgery (6.3% versus 19.2%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Robotic surgery presents promising results regarding the length of hospital stay, conversion rate to open surgery and postoperative complication rates when compared to laparoscopy based on the existing literature. Despite the lack of striking differences, robotic hiatal hernia repair is a valid and evolving approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":13168,"journal":{"name":"Hernia","volume":" ","pages":"1559-1569"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141912403","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Laparoscopic total (Nissen) versus posterior (Toupet) fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease: a propensity score-matched comparison of the perioperative and 1-year follow-up outcome. 腹腔镜全胃底折叠术(尼森)与后路折叠术(图佩特)治疗胃食管反流病:围手术期和一年随访结果的倾向得分匹配比较。
IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-17 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-024-02988-z
F Köckerling, D Jacob, D Adolf, V Zherdyev, H Riediger, H Scheuerlein

Introduction: The debate continues as to whether laparoscopic total Nissen (LNF) versus partial posterior Toupet fundoplication (LTF) leads to better outcomes in the surgical treatment of axial hiatal hernia with gastroesophageal reflux disease. In the most recent meta-analysis including 13 RCTs with 1564 patients, no significant difference was found between the two procedures in terms of perioperative complications and recurrent reflux rates. Further comparative analyses are urgently needed.

Methods: This retrospective analysis of prospectively recorded data from the Herniamed Registry compared the perioperative and 1-year follow-up outcomes after total Nissen versus partial Toupet fundoplication. Propensity score matching was chosen as the statistical method. Matching was performed for n = 2290 pairs.

Results: No systematic discrepancy was found between the Nissen and Toupet fundoplication for any of the outcome parameters (intraoperative complications LNF 2.10% vs LTF 1.48%, general complications 2.27% vs 2.88%, postoperative complications 1.44% vs 1.18%, complication-related reoperation 1.00% vs 0.91%, recurrence on 1-year follow-up 6.55% vs 5.33%, pain on exertion on 1-year follow-up 12.49% vs 9.52%, pain at rest on 1-year follow-up 10.44 vs 9.52% and pain requiring treatment on 1-year follow-up 9.61% vs 8.17%). Also the postoperative dysphagia rate showed with 5.34% after LNF and with 4.64% after LTF no significant difference.

Conclusion: The findings presented here did not show any significant difference up to 1 year after Nissen or Toupet fundoplication. This is in concordance with the findings of the meta-analyses. However, the perioperative and 1-year follow-up outcomes demonstrate that both operation techniques should be carried out by experienced surgeons.

导言:关于腹腔镜全尼森胃底折叠术(LNF)与部分后方陶氏胃底折叠术(LTF)在手术治疗伴有胃食管反流疾病的轴向食管裂孔疝方面是否会带来更好的疗效,争论仍在继续。最新的荟萃分析包括 13 项 RCT,共 1564 名患者,结果发现两种手术在围手术期并发症和复发反流率方面无明显差异。因此迫切需要进一步的比较分析:这项回顾性分析是对 Herniamed 登记处记录的前瞻性数据进行的,比较了全尼森胃底折叠术和部分图佩特胃底折叠术的围手术期和 1 年随访结果。统计方法采用倾向评分匹配法。匹配结果为 n = 2290 对:结果:尼森胃底折叠术和图佩特胃底折叠术的任何结果参数均未发现系统性差异(术中并发症 LNF 2.10% vs LTF 1.48%,一般并发症 2.27% vs 2.88%,术后并发症 1.44% vs 1.18%,并发症相关再次手术 1.00% vs 0.91%,1 年随访复发率 6.55% vs 5.33%,1 年随访劳累疼痛率 12.49% vs 9.52%,1 年随访休息疼痛率 10.44% vs 9.52%,1 年随访需要治疗的疼痛率 9.61% vs 8.17%)。此外,术后吞咽困难发生率在 LNF 后为 5.34%,在 LTF 后为 4.64%,两者无明显差异:本文的研究结果显示,尼森胃底折叠术和图佩特胃底折叠术术后一年内没有明显差异。这与荟萃分析的结果一致。不过,围手术期和 1 年随访结果表明,这两种手术技术都应由经验丰富的外科医生实施。
{"title":"Laparoscopic total (Nissen) versus posterior (Toupet) fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease: a propensity score-matched comparison of the perioperative and 1-year follow-up outcome.","authors":"F Köckerling, D Jacob, D Adolf, V Zherdyev, H Riediger, H Scheuerlein","doi":"10.1007/s10029-024-02988-z","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10029-024-02988-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The debate continues as to whether laparoscopic total Nissen (LNF) versus partial posterior Toupet fundoplication (LTF) leads to better outcomes in the surgical treatment of axial hiatal hernia with gastroesophageal reflux disease. In the most recent meta-analysis including 13 RCTs with 1564 patients, no significant difference was found between the two procedures in terms of perioperative complications and recurrent reflux rates. Further comparative analyses are urgently needed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective analysis of prospectively recorded data from the Herniamed Registry compared the perioperative and 1-year follow-up outcomes after total Nissen versus partial Toupet fundoplication. Propensity score matching was chosen as the statistical method. Matching was performed for n = 2290 pairs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No systematic discrepancy was found between the Nissen and Toupet fundoplication for any of the outcome parameters (intraoperative complications LNF 2.10% vs LTF 1.48%, general complications 2.27% vs 2.88%, postoperative complications 1.44% vs 1.18%, complication-related reoperation 1.00% vs 0.91%, recurrence on 1-year follow-up 6.55% vs 5.33%, pain on exertion on 1-year follow-up 12.49% vs 9.52%, pain at rest on 1-year follow-up 10.44 vs 9.52% and pain requiring treatment on 1-year follow-up 9.61% vs 8.17%). Also the postoperative dysphagia rate showed with 5.34% after LNF and with 4.64% after LTF no significant difference.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings presented here did not show any significant difference up to 1 year after Nissen or Toupet fundoplication. This is in concordance with the findings of the meta-analyses. However, the perioperative and 1-year follow-up outcomes demonstrate that both operation techniques should be carried out by experienced surgeons.</p>","PeriodicalId":13168,"journal":{"name":"Hernia","volume":" ","pages":"1629-1639"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140140178","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Computed tomography measurements to predict need for robotic transversus abdominis release: a single institution analysis. 预测机器人腹横肌松解术需求的计算机断层扫描测量:单机构分析。
IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-20 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-024-03007-x
L M Okorji, O Giri, K Luque-Sanchez, A D Parmar

Purpose: The radiographic rectus width to hernia width ratio (RDR) has been shown to predict ability to close fascial defect without additional myofascial release in open Rives-Stoppa abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR), but it has not been studied in robotic AWR. We aimed to examine various CT measurements to determine their usability in predicting the need for transversus abdominis release (TAR) in robotic AWR.

Methods: We performed a single-center retrospective review of 137 patients with midline ventral hernias over a 5-year period who underwent elective robotic retrorectus AWR. We excluded patients with M1 or M5 hernias, lateral/flank hernias, and hybrid repairs. The CT measurements included hernia width (HW), hernia width/abdominal width ratio (HW/AW), and RDR. Univariate, multivariate and area under the curve (AUC) analyses were performed.

Results: 58/137 patients required TAR (32 unilateral, 26 bilateral). Patients undergoing TAR had a significantly higher average HW and HW/AW and lower RDR. Multivariate analysis revealed that prior hernia repair was independently associated with need for TAR (p = 0.03). ROC analysis and AUC values showed acceptable diagnostic ability of HW, HW/AW and RDR in predicting need for TAR. Cutoffs of RDR ≤ 2, HW/AW > 0.3, and HW > 10 cm yielded high specificity in determining need for any TAR (97.5% vs. 96.2% vs. 92.4%) or bilateral TAR (95.5% vs. 94.6% vs. 92.8%).

Conclusion: History of prior hernia repair was a risk factor for robotic TAR. CT measurements have some predictive value in determining need for TAR in robotic AWR. Further prospective analysis is needed in this patient population.

目的:在开放式Rives-Stoppa腹壁重建术(AWR)中,放射学直肌宽度与疝宽度之比(RDR)已被证明可预测在不进行额外肌筋膜松解的情况下关闭筋膜缺损的能力,但在机器人AWR中尚未进行过研究。我们旨在研究各种 CT 测量方法,以确定它们在预测机器人腹壁重建术中是否需要腹横肌松解术 (TAR) 时的可用性:我们对 5 年内接受择期机器人腹股沟后路疝切除术的 137 名中线腹股沟疝患者进行了单中心回顾性研究。我们排除了M1或M5疝、侧/侧面疝和混合修补术患者。CT 测量包括疝宽(HW)、疝宽/腹宽比(HW/AW)和 RDR。进行了单变量、多变量和曲线下面积(AUC)分析:结果:58/137 例患者需要进行 TAR(32 例单侧,26 例双侧)。接受 TAR 的患者平均 HW 和 HW/AW 明显更高,RDR 更低。多变量分析显示,既往疝修补术与是否需要 TAR 有独立关联(p = 0.03)。ROC分析和AUC值显示,HW、HW/AW和RDR在预测TAR需求方面的诊断能力是可以接受的。RDR ≤ 2、HW/AW > 0.3 和 HW > 10 cm 的临界值在确定是否需要任何 TAR(97.5% vs. 96.2% vs. 92.4%)或双侧 TAR(95.5% vs. 94.6% vs. 92.8%)时具有较高的特异性:结论:既往疝修补术史是机器人 TAR 的一个风险因素。结论:既往疝修补术史是机器人疝修补术(robotic TAR)的风险因素。需要对这一患者群体进行进一步的前瞻性分析。
{"title":"Computed tomography measurements to predict need for robotic transversus abdominis release: a single institution analysis.","authors":"L M Okorji, O Giri, K Luque-Sanchez, A D Parmar","doi":"10.1007/s10029-024-03007-x","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10029-024-03007-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The radiographic rectus width to hernia width ratio (RDR) has been shown to predict ability to close fascial defect without additional myofascial release in open Rives-Stoppa abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR), but it has not been studied in robotic AWR. We aimed to examine various CT measurements to determine their usability in predicting the need for transversus abdominis release (TAR) in robotic AWR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a single-center retrospective review of 137 patients with midline ventral hernias over a 5-year period who underwent elective robotic retrorectus AWR. We excluded patients with M1 or M5 hernias, lateral/flank hernias, and hybrid repairs. The CT measurements included hernia width (HW), hernia width/abdominal width ratio (HW/AW), and RDR. Univariate, multivariate and area under the curve (AUC) analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>58/137 patients required TAR (32 unilateral, 26 bilateral). Patients undergoing TAR had a significantly higher average HW and HW/AW and lower RDR. Multivariate analysis revealed that prior hernia repair was independently associated with need for TAR (p = 0.03). ROC analysis and AUC values showed acceptable diagnostic ability of HW, HW/AW and RDR in predicting need for TAR. Cutoffs of RDR ≤ 2, HW/AW > 0.3, and HW > 10 cm yielded high specificity in determining need for any TAR (97.5% vs. 96.2% vs. 92.4%) or bilateral TAR (95.5% vs. 94.6% vs. 92.8%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>History of prior hernia repair was a risk factor for robotic TAR. CT measurements have some predictive value in determining need for TAR in robotic AWR. Further prospective analysis is needed in this patient population.</p>","PeriodicalId":13168,"journal":{"name":"Hernia","volume":" ","pages":"1649-1655"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140174455","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The changes in abdominal wall muscles following incisional hernia wall reconstruction. 切口疝壁重建后腹壁肌肉的变化。
IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-22 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-024-02969-2
Z Wang, X Wang, C Wang, Y Zhao

Purpose: The objective of incisional hernia surgery is to achieve the restoration of abdominal wall anatomical and physiological functions. This study aims to investigate the impact of abdominal wall reconstruction on abdominal muscle alterations by measuring the preoperative and postoperative changes in abdominal wall muscles in patients undergoing incisional hernia repair.

Methods: For patients undergoing open incisional hernia abdominal wall reconstruction, preoperative and postoperative abdominal CT scans were analyzed at a minimum of 3 months post-surgery. 3D Slicer software was utilized for measuring preoperative and postoperative changes in abdominal cavity volume, abdominal muscle volume, as well as muscle volume, cross-sectional area, and abdominal circumference at specific levels. The acquired data were subjected to statistical analysis using SPSS software.

Results: A total of 40 patients meeting the inclusion criteria underwent open incisional hernia repair surgery. Some of these patients required component separation technique (CST) due to the larger size of the hernia sac. The abdominal muscles surrounding the hernia ring were defined as the "damaged group," while the remaining abdominal muscles were defined as the "undamaged group." Measurements revealed a significant increase in the volume of rectus abdominis, external oblique, internal oblique, and transversus abdominis muscles in the damaged group. Similarly, there was a corresponding increase in the volume of rectus abdominis, external oblique, internal oblique, and transversus abdominis muscles in the undamaged group.

Conclusions: After abdominal wall reconstruction in incisional hernia patients, not only is their anatomical structure restored, but the overall biomechanical integrity of the abdominal wall is also repaired. The damaged muscles are subjected to renewed loading, leading to the reversal of disuse atrophy and an increase in muscle volume.

目的:切口疝手术的目的是恢复腹壁的解剖和生理功能。本研究旨在通过测量切口疝修补术患者术前和术后腹壁肌肉的变化,研究腹壁重建对腹壁肌肉改变的影响:方法:对接受开腹切口疝腹壁重建术的患者进行术前和术后腹部 CT 扫描分析,扫描时间至少为术后 3 个月。利用 3D Slicer 软件测量术前和术后腹腔容积、腹肌容积以及特定层面的肌肉容积、横截面积和腹围的变化。获得的数据使用 SPSS 软件进行统计分析:共有 40 名符合纳入标准的患者接受了开腹切口疝修补手术。其中一些患者由于疝囊较大,需要采用组件分离技术(CST)。疝环周围的腹肌被定义为 "受损组",而其余腹肌被定义为 "未受损组"。测量结果显示,受损组腹直肌、腹外斜肌、腹内斜肌和腹横肌的体积明显增加。同样,未受损组的腹直肌、腹外斜肌、腹内斜肌和腹横肌的体积也相应增加:切口疝患者腹壁重建后,不仅解剖结构得到恢复,腹壁的整体生物力学完整性也得到修复。受损的肌肉重新承受负荷,导致废用性萎缩的逆转和肌肉体积的增加。
{"title":"The changes in abdominal wall muscles following incisional hernia wall reconstruction.","authors":"Z Wang, X Wang, C Wang, Y Zhao","doi":"10.1007/s10029-024-02969-2","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10029-024-02969-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The objective of incisional hernia surgery is to achieve the restoration of abdominal wall anatomical and physiological functions. This study aims to investigate the impact of abdominal wall reconstruction on abdominal muscle alterations by measuring the preoperative and postoperative changes in abdominal wall muscles in patients undergoing incisional hernia repair.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For patients undergoing open incisional hernia abdominal wall reconstruction, preoperative and postoperative abdominal CT scans were analyzed at a minimum of 3 months post-surgery. 3D Slicer software was utilized for measuring preoperative and postoperative changes in abdominal cavity volume, abdominal muscle volume, as well as muscle volume, cross-sectional area, and abdominal circumference at specific levels. The acquired data were subjected to statistical analysis using SPSS software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 40 patients meeting the inclusion criteria underwent open incisional hernia repair surgery. Some of these patients required component separation technique (CST) due to the larger size of the hernia sac. The abdominal muscles surrounding the hernia ring were defined as the \"damaged group,\" while the remaining abdominal muscles were defined as the \"undamaged group.\" Measurements revealed a significant increase in the volume of rectus abdominis, external oblique, internal oblique, and transversus abdominis muscles in the damaged group. Similarly, there was a corresponding increase in the volume of rectus abdominis, external oblique, internal oblique, and transversus abdominis muscles in the undamaged group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>After abdominal wall reconstruction in incisional hernia patients, not only is their anatomical structure restored, but the overall biomechanical integrity of the abdominal wall is also repaired. The damaged muscles are subjected to renewed loading, leading to the reversal of disuse atrophy and an increase in muscle volume.</p>","PeriodicalId":13168,"journal":{"name":"Hernia","volume":" ","pages":"1609-1617"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140189666","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Is surgeon annual case volume related with intra and postoperative complications after ventral hernia repair? Uni- and multivariate analysis of prospective registry-based data. 外科医生的年手术量与腹股沟疝修补术后的术中和术后并发症有关吗?基于前瞻性登记数据的单变量和多变量分析。
IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-07 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-024-03129-2
R van den Berg, F P J den Hartog, A G Menon, P J Tanis, J F Gillion

Background: Literature on a potential relationship between surgeon case volume and intra- or postoperative complications after ventral hernia repair remains scarce.

Methods: Patients who underwent ventral hernia repair between 2011 and 2023 were selected from the prospectively maintained French Hernia-Club Registry. Outcome variables were: intraoperative events, postoperative general complications, surgical site occurrences, surgical site infections, length of intensive care unit (ICU), and patient-reported scar bulging during follow-up. Surgeons' annual case volume was categorized as 1-5, 6-50, 51-100, 101-125, and > 125 cases, and its association with outcome volume was evaluated using uni- and multivariable analyses.

Results: Over the study period, 199 titular or temporary members registered 15,332 ventral hernia repairs, including 7869 primary, 6173 incisional, and 212 parastomal hernia repairs. In univariate analysis, surgeons' annual case volume was significantly related with all the postoperative studied outcomes. After multivariate regression analysis, annual case volume remained significantly associated with intra-operative complications, postoperative general complications and length of ICU stay. A primary repair was independently associated with fewer intra- and post-operative complications.

Conclusion: In the present multivariable analysis of a large registry on ventral hernia repairs, higher surgeon annual case volume was significantly related with fewer postoperative general complications and a shorter length of stay, but not with fewer surgical site occurrences, nor with less patient-reported scar bulging. Factors in the surgeons' case mix such as the type of hernia have significant impact on complication rates.

背景:有关外科医生手术量与腹股沟疝修补术术中或术后并发症之间潜在关系的文献仍然很少:方法:从法国疝俱乐部前瞻性登记处选取 2011 年至 2023 年间接受腹股沟疝修补术的患者。结果变量包括:术中事件、术后一般并发症、手术部位并发症、手术部位感染、重症监护室(ICU)时间以及随访期间患者报告的疤痕隆起。外科医生的年手术量分为1-5例、6-50例、51-100例、101-125例和大于125例,采用单变量和多变量分析评估其与手术量的关系:结果:在研究期间,199 名正式成员或临时成员登记了 15332 例腹股沟疝修补术,其中包括 7869 例原发性疝修补术、6173 例切口疝修补术和 212 例腹膜旁疝修补术。在单变量分析中,外科医生的年手术量与所有术后研究结果都有显著关系。经过多变量回归分析,年手术量与术中并发症、术后一般并发症和重症监护室住院时间仍有显著关系。初次修复与较少的术中和术后并发症有独立关联:结论:本研究对腹股沟疝修补术的大型登记资料进行了多变量分析,结果表明,外科医生年手术量越大,术后一般并发症越少,住院时间越短,但手术部位并发症越少,患者报告的疤痕隆起也越少。外科医生的病例组合因素(如疝气类型)对并发症发生率有重大影响。
{"title":"Is surgeon annual case volume related with intra and postoperative complications after ventral hernia repair? Uni- and multivariate analysis of prospective registry-based data.","authors":"R van den Berg, F P J den Hartog, A G Menon, P J Tanis, J F Gillion","doi":"10.1007/s10029-024-03129-2","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10029-024-03129-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Literature on a potential relationship between surgeon case volume and intra- or postoperative complications after ventral hernia repair remains scarce.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent ventral hernia repair between 2011 and 2023 were selected from the prospectively maintained French Hernia-Club Registry. Outcome variables were: intraoperative events, postoperative general complications, surgical site occurrences, surgical site infections, length of intensive care unit (ICU), and patient-reported scar bulging during follow-up. Surgeons' annual case volume was categorized as 1-5, 6-50, 51-100, 101-125, and > 125 cases, and its association with outcome volume was evaluated using uni- and multivariable analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over the study period, 199 titular or temporary members registered 15,332 ventral hernia repairs, including 7869 primary, 6173 incisional, and 212 parastomal hernia repairs. In univariate analysis, surgeons' annual case volume was significantly related with all the postoperative studied outcomes. After multivariate regression analysis, annual case volume remained significantly associated with intra-operative complications, postoperative general complications and length of ICU stay. A primary repair was independently associated with fewer intra- and post-operative complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the present multivariable analysis of a large registry on ventral hernia repairs, higher surgeon annual case volume was significantly related with fewer postoperative general complications and a shorter length of stay, but not with fewer surgical site occurrences, nor with less patient-reported scar bulging. Factors in the surgeons' case mix such as the type of hernia have significant impact on complication rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":13168,"journal":{"name":"Hernia","volume":" ","pages":"1935-1944"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11449983/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141901584","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cruroplasty as a standalone treatment for recurrent hiatal hernia repair. 作为复发性食管裂孔疝修补术的一种独立疗法的嵴成形术。
IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-19 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-024-03088-8
Ashley Tran, Luke R Putnam, Lucy Harvey, John C Lipham

Purpose: Following laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery (LARS), recurrence of hiatal hernia is common. Patients with symptomatic recurrence typically undergo revision of the fundoplication or conversion to magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) in addition to cruroplasty. However, patients with an intact fundoplication or MSA may only require repeat cruroplasty to repair their recurrent hiatal hernia. The purpose of this study is to compare outcomes following cruroplasty alone compared to full revision (i.e. redo fundoplication or MSA with cruroplasty) for the management of recurrent hiatal hernias.

Methods: A retrospective review of patients undergoing surgical revision of a symptomatic recurrent hiatal hernia between February 2009 and October 2022 was performed. Preoperative characteristics, intraoperative details, and postoperative outcomes were compared between patients undergoing cruroplasty alone versus full revision.

Results: A total of 141 patients were included in the analysis. 93 patients underwent full revision, and 48 patients underwent cruroplasty alone. The mean time between initial and revisional surgery was 8 ± 7.7 years. There was no significant difference in operative time or rates of intra-operative or post-operative complication between groups. Patients undergoing cruroplasty alone had a mean Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Health Related Quality Life (GERD-HRQL) Questionnaire score of 9.6 ± 10.2 compared to a mean score of 8.9 ± 11.2 for full revision patients (p = 0.829). Recurrence rates following revision was 10.4% for cruroplasty alone patients and 11.8% in full revision patients (p > 0.999).

Conclusion: In patients with intact fundoplication or MSA, cruroplasty alone results in similar post-operative outcomes compared to full revision for recurrent hiatal hernia.

目的:腹腔镜抗反流手术(LARS)后,食管裂孔疝复发很常见。有症状的复发患者通常需要进行胃底折叠术翻修或改用磁性括约肌增强术(MSA),此外还需要进行蝶鞍成形术。然而,胃底折叠术或磁性括约肌增强术完好无损的患者可能只需要重复嵴成形术来修复复发性食管裂孔疝。本研究的目的是比较在治疗复发性食管裂孔疝时,单纯蝶鞍成形术与全面翻修术(即重做胃底折叠术或 MSA 加蝶鞍成形术)的疗效:方法:对2009年2月至2022年10月期间接受症状性复发性食管裂孔疝手术翻修的患者进行回顾性研究。结果:共纳入 141 名患者,其中包括一名患者接受了椎体后凸成形术(Cruroplasty),一名患者接受了椎体后凸成形术(Cruroplasty),还有一名患者接受了椎体后凸成形术(Cruroplasty):结果:共有 141 名患者纳入分析。93名患者接受了完全翻修术,48名患者仅接受了椎体后凸成形术。初次手术与翻修手术之间的平均间隔时间为 8 ± 7.7 年。两组患者的手术时间、术中或术后并发症发生率无明显差异。单纯接受嵴成形术的患者胃食管反流病健康相关生活质量(GERD-HRQL)问卷平均得分为(9.6 ± 10.2)分,而完全翻修患者的平均得分为(8.9 ± 11.2)分(P = 0.829)。单纯胃底折叠术患者的复发率为 10.4%,而全面翻修患者的复发率为 11.8%(P > 0.999):结论:对于胃底折叠术或MSA完好的患者,在复发性食管裂孔疝的治疗中,单纯蝶鞍成形术与全面翻修术的术后效果相似。
{"title":"Cruroplasty as a standalone treatment for recurrent hiatal hernia repair.","authors":"Ashley Tran, Luke R Putnam, Lucy Harvey, John C Lipham","doi":"10.1007/s10029-024-03088-8","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10029-024-03088-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Following laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery (LARS), recurrence of hiatal hernia is common. Patients with symptomatic recurrence typically undergo revision of the fundoplication or conversion to magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) in addition to cruroplasty. However, patients with an intact fundoplication or MSA may only require repeat cruroplasty to repair their recurrent hiatal hernia. The purpose of this study is to compare outcomes following cruroplasty alone compared to full revision (i.e. redo fundoplication or MSA with cruroplasty) for the management of recurrent hiatal hernias.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of patients undergoing surgical revision of a symptomatic recurrent hiatal hernia between February 2009 and October 2022 was performed. Preoperative characteristics, intraoperative details, and postoperative outcomes were compared between patients undergoing cruroplasty alone versus full revision.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 141 patients were included in the analysis. 93 patients underwent full revision, and 48 patients underwent cruroplasty alone. The mean time between initial and revisional surgery was 8 ± 7.7 years. There was no significant difference in operative time or rates of intra-operative or post-operative complication between groups. Patients undergoing cruroplasty alone had a mean Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Health Related Quality Life (GERD-HRQL) Questionnaire score of 9.6 ± 10.2 compared to a mean score of 8.9 ± 11.2 for full revision patients (p = 0.829). Recurrence rates following revision was 10.4% for cruroplasty alone patients and 11.8% in full revision patients (p > 0.999).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with intact fundoplication or MSA, cruroplasty alone results in similar post-operative outcomes compared to full revision for recurrent hiatal hernia.</p>","PeriodicalId":13168,"journal":{"name":"Hernia","volume":" ","pages":"1817-1822"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11449985/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141418705","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comment to: Staged abdominal wall reconstruction in the setting of complex gastrointestinal reconstruction. 发表评论:复杂胃肠道重建中的分期腹壁重建。
IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-28 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-024-03060-6
P N Hackenberger, D S Eiferman, J E Janis
{"title":"Comment to: Staged abdominal wall reconstruction in the setting of complex gastrointestinal reconstruction.","authors":"P N Hackenberger, D S Eiferman, J E Janis","doi":"10.1007/s10029-024-03060-6","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10029-024-03060-6","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":13168,"journal":{"name":"Hernia","volume":" ","pages":"2025-2026"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140857603","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Open inguinal hernia repair under ultrasound-guided ilioinguinal block is the procedure of choice in elderly patients. 在超声引导下进行髂腹股沟阻滞下的开放式腹股沟疝修补术是老年患者的首选手术。
IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-20 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-024-03048-2
Kaushik Bhattacharya, Vipul D Yagnik
{"title":"Open inguinal hernia repair under ultrasound-guided ilioinguinal block is the procedure of choice in elderly patients.","authors":"Kaushik Bhattacharya, Vipul D Yagnik","doi":"10.1007/s10029-024-03048-2","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10029-024-03048-2","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":13168,"journal":{"name":"Hernia","volume":" ","pages":"2001-2002"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140860906","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Preoperative CT findings predict the development of metachronous contralateral inguinal hernia after unilateral inguinal hernia repair: a single-center retrospective cohort study. 单侧腹股沟疝修补术后对侧腹股沟疝发展的术前 CT 预测结果:一项单中心回顾性队列研究。
IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-31 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-024-03123-8
Hang Yu, Jiajie Qian, Yang Dong, Tang Yu, Ying Zeng, Qianyun Shen

Purpose: To identify potential clinical and preoperative CT risk factors that can predict the development of metachronous contralateral inguinal hernia (MCIH) after unilateral inguinal hernia repair (IHR).

Methods: This study included unilateral inguinal hernia patients seen from 2016 to 2019 who underwent CT and subsequent IHR and had at least five years of follow-up. Preoperative CT scans were retrospectively reviewed for the presence of asymmetric spermatic cord fat and weakness of the transversalis fascia. The correlations of each CT feature and other clinical characteristics with the development of MCIH were calculated. The Kaplan-Meier model and multiple logistic regression were used to evaluate the associations among CT features, clinical variables and MCIH.

Results: A total of 677 male patients aged > 40 years were included in the study cohort. After more than 5 years of follow-up, 162 patients developed MCIH, representing an incidence of 23.9%. Patients with radical prostatectomy or peritoneal dialysis [P < 0.0001, HR 4.189 (95% CI 2.369 to 7.406)], primary left-sided IHR [P = 0.0032, HR 1.626 (95% CI 1.177 to 2.244)], and direct, femoral or pantaloon hernias were predisposed to MCIH. Asymmetric spermatic cord fat [P = 0.0002, HR 1.203 (95% CI 0.8785 to 1.648)] and weakness of the transversalis fascia [P < 0.0001, HR 7.914 (95% CI 5.666 to 11.05)] on preoperative CT were also identified as risk facts and demonstrated to be independent predictive factors for MCIH development.

Conclusion: Asymmetric spermatic cord fat and weakness of the transversalis fascia were predictive factors for MCIH development. For decision making regarding prophylactic contralateral IHR at the time of index surgery, preoperative CT findings as well as clinical characteristics should be considered.

目的:确定可预测单侧腹股沟疝修补术(IHR)后发生对侧腹股沟疝(MCIH)的潜在临床和术前 CT 风险因素:本研究纳入了2016年至2019年期间就诊的单侧腹股沟疝患者,这些患者接受了CT检查和随后的IHR,并至少随访了五年。对术前 CT 扫描进行回顾性审查,以确定是否存在不对称精索脂肪和横筋膜薄弱。计算了每个 CT 特征和其他临床特征与 MCIH 发展的相关性。采用 Kaplan-Meier 模型和多元 Logistic 回归评估 CT 特征、临床变量和 MCIH 之间的关联:结果:共有677名年龄大于40岁的男性患者被纳入研究队列。经过5年多的随访,162名患者出现了MCIH,发生率为23.9%。接受根治性前列腺切除术或腹膜透析的患者[P 结论:精索脂肪不对称和横筋膜薄弱是MCIH发病的预测因素。在进行索引手术时,在决定是否预防性对侧 IHR 时,应考虑术前 CT 结果和临床特征。
{"title":"Preoperative CT findings predict the development of metachronous contralateral inguinal hernia after unilateral inguinal hernia repair: a single-center retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Hang Yu, Jiajie Qian, Yang Dong, Tang Yu, Ying Zeng, Qianyun Shen","doi":"10.1007/s10029-024-03123-8","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10029-024-03123-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To identify potential clinical and preoperative CT risk factors that can predict the development of metachronous contralateral inguinal hernia (MCIH) after unilateral inguinal hernia repair (IHR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included unilateral inguinal hernia patients seen from 2016 to 2019 who underwent CT and subsequent IHR and had at least five years of follow-up. Preoperative CT scans were retrospectively reviewed for the presence of asymmetric spermatic cord fat and weakness of the transversalis fascia. The correlations of each CT feature and other clinical characteristics with the development of MCIH were calculated. The Kaplan-Meier model and multiple logistic regression were used to evaluate the associations among CT features, clinical variables and MCIH.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 677 male patients aged > 40 years were included in the study cohort. After more than 5 years of follow-up, 162 patients developed MCIH, representing an incidence of 23.9%. Patients with radical prostatectomy or peritoneal dialysis [P < 0.0001, HR 4.189 (95% CI 2.369 to 7.406)], primary left-sided IHR [P = 0.0032, HR 1.626 (95% CI 1.177 to 2.244)], and direct, femoral or pantaloon hernias were predisposed to MCIH. Asymmetric spermatic cord fat [P = 0.0002, HR 1.203 (95% CI 0.8785 to 1.648)] and weakness of the transversalis fascia [P < 0.0001, HR 7.914 (95% CI 5.666 to 11.05)] on preoperative CT were also identified as risk facts and demonstrated to be independent predictive factors for MCIH development.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Asymmetric spermatic cord fat and weakness of the transversalis fascia were predictive factors for MCIH development. For decision making regarding prophylactic contralateral IHR at the time of index surgery, preoperative CT findings as well as clinical characteristics should be considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":13168,"journal":{"name":"Hernia","volume":" ","pages":"1925-1934"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141859627","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Hernia
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1