Derek S. Andrews, Andrew J. Dakopolos, Joshua K. Lee, Brianna Heath, Devani Cordero, Marjorie Solomon, David G. Amaral, Christine Wu Nordahl
Of the 1 in 36 individuals in the United States who are diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder, nearly 40% also have intellectual disability (ID). The cortex has been widely implicated in neural processes underlying autistic behaviors as well as intellectual ability. Thus, neuroimaging features such as cortical thickness are of particular interest as a possible biomarkers of the condition. However, neuroimaging studies often fail to include autistic individuals with ID. As a result, there are few studies of cortical thickness in autistic individuals across the entire range of intellectual abilities. This study used MRI to evaluate cortical thickness in young autistic children (n = 88, mean age 5.37 years) with a large range of intellectual ability (IQ 19–133) as well as nonautistic, nondevelopmentally delayed (referred to here as typically developing [TD]) peers (n = 53, mean age 5.29 years). We first investigated associations between full scale IQ and cortical thickness in both autistic and TD children. Autistic children had significant negative associations (i.e., thinner cortex, higher IQ) in bilateral entorhinal cortex, right fusiform gyrus, superior, middle and inferior temporal gyri, and right temporal pole that were not present in TD children. Significantly thicker cortex was also observed in these regions for autistic children with ID (i.e., IQ ≤ 70) compared with those without. Last, given the reported correspondence between the severity of autism symptoms and intellectual ability, we compared cortical thickness associations with both IQ and ADOS Calibrated Severity Scores and found these patterns overlapped to a significant degree across the cortex.
{"title":"Cortical Thickness Differences in Autistic Children With and Without Intellectual Disability","authors":"Derek S. Andrews, Andrew J. Dakopolos, Joshua K. Lee, Brianna Heath, Devani Cordero, Marjorie Solomon, David G. Amaral, Christine Wu Nordahl","doi":"10.1002/aur.3313","DOIUrl":"10.1002/aur.3313","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Of the 1 in 36 individuals in the United States who are diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder, nearly 40% also have intellectual disability (ID). The cortex has been widely implicated in neural processes underlying autistic behaviors as well as intellectual ability. Thus, neuroimaging features such as cortical thickness are of particular interest as a possible biomarkers of the condition. However, neuroimaging studies often fail to include autistic individuals with ID. As a result, there are few studies of cortical thickness in autistic individuals across the entire range of intellectual abilities. This study used MRI to evaluate cortical thickness in young autistic children (<i>n</i> = 88, mean age 5.37 years) with a large range of intellectual ability (IQ 19–133) as well as nonautistic, nondevelopmentally delayed (referred to here as typically developing [TD]) peers (<i>n</i> = 53, mean age 5.29 years). We first investigated associations between full scale IQ and cortical thickness in both autistic and TD children. Autistic children had significant negative associations (i.e., thinner cortex, higher IQ) in bilateral entorhinal cortex, right fusiform gyrus, superior, middle and inferior temporal gyri, and right temporal pole that were not present in TD children. Significantly thicker cortex was also observed in these regions for autistic children with ID (i.e., IQ ≤ 70) compared with those without. Last, given the reported correspondence between the severity of autism symptoms and intellectual ability, we compared cortical thickness associations with both IQ and ADOS Calibrated Severity Scores and found these patterns overlapped to a significant degree across the cortex.</p>","PeriodicalId":131,"journal":{"name":"Autism Research","volume":"18 3","pages":"486-497"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aur.3313","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143069963","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Joshua Ryan Smith, Seri Lim, Snehal Bindra, Sarah Marler, Bavani Rajah, Zachary J. Williams, Isaac Baldwin, Nausheen Hossain, Jo Ellen Wilson, D. Catherine Fuchs, James Luccarelli
Catatonia is a highly morbid psychomotor and affective disorder, which can affect autistic individuals with and without intellectual disability. Catatonic symptoms are treatable with pharmacotherapy and electroconvulsive therapy, but the longitudinal effectiveness of these treatments in autistic individuals has not been described. We conducted a prospective observational cohort study of patients with autism and co-morbid catatonia who received outpatient care in a specialized outpatient clinic from July 1, 2021 to May 31, 2024. Data investigating pharmacologic interventions, and clinical measures including the Bush Francis Catatonia Rating Scale (BFCRS), Kanner Catatonia Severity Scale (KCS), Kanner Catatonia Examination (KCE), and Clinical Global Impression—Improvement (CGI-I) were collected. Forty-five autistic patients with co-morbid catatonia were treated during the study period. The mean age was 15.6 (SD = 7.9) years [Mdn = 16.0, range 6.0–31.0]. Forty-one patients (91.1%) met criteria for autism with co-occurring intellectual disability. All patients received pharmacotherapy. Forty-four (97.8%) were treated with benzodiazepines with a mean maximal daily dose of 17.4 mg (SD = 15.8) lorazepam equivalents. Thirty-five patients (77.8%) required more than one medication class for treatment. Sixteen (35.6%) patients received electroconvulsive therapy. Fourteen patients (31.1%) attempted to taper off benzodiazepines after achieving clinical improvement during the study period; of these, 5 patients (11.1%) were successfully tapered off, and the remaining 9 (17.8%) discontinued the taper due to a return of catatonic symptoms. Statistically significant improvement was observed across all clinical domains except the KCS. However, the majority remained at least partially symptomatic over the study period. Three patients (6.7%) died over the study period. Despite clinical improvements while receiving the gold standard for psychopharmacologic management of catatonia, chronic symptoms remained for the majority of catatonia patients over the study period, and few were able to taper and discontinue benzodiazepine treatment. Notably, the open label design of this study is a limiting factor when interpreting the results.
{"title":"Longitudinal Symptom Burden and Pharmacologic Management of Catatonia in Autism With Intellectual Disability: An Observational Study","authors":"Joshua Ryan Smith, Seri Lim, Snehal Bindra, Sarah Marler, Bavani Rajah, Zachary J. Williams, Isaac Baldwin, Nausheen Hossain, Jo Ellen Wilson, D. Catherine Fuchs, James Luccarelli","doi":"10.1002/aur.3315","DOIUrl":"10.1002/aur.3315","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Catatonia is a highly morbid psychomotor and affective disorder, which can affect autistic individuals with and without intellectual disability. Catatonic symptoms are treatable with pharmacotherapy and electroconvulsive therapy, but the longitudinal effectiveness of these treatments in autistic individuals has not been described. We conducted a prospective observational cohort study of patients with autism and co-morbid catatonia who received outpatient care in a specialized outpatient clinic from July 1, 2021 to May 31, 2024. Data investigating pharmacologic interventions, and clinical measures including the Bush Francis Catatonia Rating Scale (BFCRS), Kanner Catatonia Severity Scale (KCS), Kanner Catatonia Examination (KCE), and Clinical Global Impression—Improvement (CGI-I) were collected. Forty-five autistic patients with co-morbid catatonia were treated during the study period. The mean age was 15.6 (SD = 7.9) years [Mdn = 16.0, range 6.0–31.0]. Forty-one patients (91.1%) met criteria for autism with co-occurring intellectual disability. All patients received pharmacotherapy. Forty-four (97.8%) were treated with benzodiazepines with a mean maximal daily dose of 17.4 mg (SD = 15.8) lorazepam equivalents. Thirty-five patients (77.8%) required more than one medication class for treatment. Sixteen (35.6%) patients received electroconvulsive therapy. Fourteen patients (31.1%) attempted to taper off benzodiazepines after achieving clinical improvement during the study period; of these, 5 patients (11.1%) were successfully tapered off, and the remaining 9 (17.8%) discontinued the taper due to a return of catatonic symptoms. Statistically significant improvement was observed across all clinical domains except the KCS. However, the majority remained at least partially symptomatic over the study period. Three patients (6.7%) died over the study period. Despite clinical improvements while receiving the gold standard for psychopharmacologic management of catatonia, chronic symptoms remained for the majority of catatonia patients over the study period, and few were able to taper and discontinue benzodiazepine treatment. Notably, the open label design of this study is a limiting factor when interpreting the results.</p>","PeriodicalId":131,"journal":{"name":"Autism Research","volume":"18 2","pages":"449-462"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aur.3315","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143048788","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
<p>The editors of <b> <i>Autism Research</i> </b> would like to wish you a healthy, happy, and productive 2025. <i>If you consider publishing a paper in the journal in the future, please read the following</i>:</p><p>During 2024, we received an unprecedented number of submissions to <i>Autism Research</i>. We thank the authors and the reviewers for their support of the journal. We also received an unusually large number of submissions that were not consistent with the aims and scope of the journal and, therefore, were not suitable for publication in the journal. For many of these, it appears that the authors had not fully reviewed the Author Guidelines, which can be found by clicking the “Contribute” button on the blue banner on the journal home page. This takes authors to the following link (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/page/journal/19393806/homepage/forauthors.html).</p><p>To be fully informed about the types of submission most likely to be published in <i>Autism Research</i>, we would encourage potential authors to review the instructions in full and to pay special attention to the second section “2. Aims & Scope” of the Author Guidelines. <b>This section is there to help you determine whether your article is appropriate for the journal</b>. In the text below, we summarize some of the important inclusion and exclusion criteria for submitted papers.</p><p>The journal focuses on reports of novel findings related to genetic, neurobiological, immunological, medical, epidemiological, and psychological mechanisms and how these influence developmental processes in autism spectrum disorder. The journal encourages the submission of original research papers (Research Articles and Short Reports) that take a developmental approach to the biology and psychology of autism, with a particular emphasis on identifying underlying mechanisms and integrating across different levels of analysis. Contributions are typically empirical, but the journal also publishes theoretical papers if they significantly advance thinking. The journal encourages papers reporting work on animal, cell, or other model systems that are directly relevant to a better understanding of autism or related conditions. The journal also publishes reports of carefully conducted clinical trials of treatments for the core symptoms or one of the common co-occurring conditions of autism.</p><p>For papers submitted to <i>Autism Research</i>, a <b>clinical trial</b> is defined as any research study that prospectively assigns human participants or groups to one or more interventions to evaluate the effects of those interventions on <b>health-related biomedical or behavioral outcomes</b>. Health-related interventions include drugs, surgical procedures, devices, behavioral treatments, dietary interventions, or educational programs. By this definition, an equine or animal-assisted intervention would be considered a clinical trial. Health outcomes include any biomedical
{"title":"What We Publish and What We Do Not","authors":"David G. Amaral, the Associate Editors","doi":"10.1002/aur.3307","DOIUrl":"10.1002/aur.3307","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The editors of <b>\u0000 <i>Autism Research</i>\u0000 </b> would like to wish you a healthy, happy, and productive 2025. <i>If you consider publishing a paper in the journal in the future, please read the following</i>:</p><p>During 2024, we received an unprecedented number of submissions to <i>Autism Research</i>. We thank the authors and the reviewers for their support of the journal. We also received an unusually large number of submissions that were not consistent with the aims and scope of the journal and, therefore, were not suitable for publication in the journal. For many of these, it appears that the authors had not fully reviewed the Author Guidelines, which can be found by clicking the “Contribute” button on the blue banner on the journal home page. This takes authors to the following link (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/page/journal/19393806/homepage/forauthors.html).</p><p>To be fully informed about the types of submission most likely to be published in <i>Autism Research</i>, we would encourage potential authors to review the instructions in full and to pay special attention to the second section “2. Aims & Scope” of the Author Guidelines. <b>This section is there to help you determine whether your article is appropriate for the journal</b>. In the text below, we summarize some of the important inclusion and exclusion criteria for submitted papers.</p><p>The journal focuses on reports of novel findings related to genetic, neurobiological, immunological, medical, epidemiological, and psychological mechanisms and how these influence developmental processes in autism spectrum disorder. The journal encourages the submission of original research papers (Research Articles and Short Reports) that take a developmental approach to the biology and psychology of autism, with a particular emphasis on identifying underlying mechanisms and integrating across different levels of analysis. Contributions are typically empirical, but the journal also publishes theoretical papers if they significantly advance thinking. The journal encourages papers reporting work on animal, cell, or other model systems that are directly relevant to a better understanding of autism or related conditions. The journal also publishes reports of carefully conducted clinical trials of treatments for the core symptoms or one of the common co-occurring conditions of autism.</p><p>For papers submitted to <i>Autism Research</i>, a <b>clinical trial</b> is defined as any research study that prospectively assigns human participants or groups to one or more interventions to evaluate the effects of those interventions on <b>health-related biomedical or behavioral outcomes</b>. Health-related interventions include drugs, surgical procedures, devices, behavioral treatments, dietary interventions, or educational programs. By this definition, an equine or animal-assisted intervention would be considered a clinical trial. Health outcomes include any biomedical ","PeriodicalId":131,"journal":{"name":"Autism Research","volume":"18 1","pages":"7-8"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aur.3307","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143017249","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Paula Araya, Katrina Phillips, Karen Waldie, Lisa Underwood
This study explored gross motor development (GMD) trajectories among 6359 children, with and without autism, from the Growing Up in New Zealand longitudinal cohort study. By the age of 8, 173 children had either an autism diagnosis (n = 108) or parent-reported autism concerns (n = 65). Gross motor milestones were reported by mothers when children were 9, 24, and 54 months of age. We found that irrespective of autism diagnosis, GMD delays at 24 months of age were more likely among girls, children born preterm, and those whose mothers identified as European. A mixed-effect logistic regression model, controlling for antenatal maternal and child covariates, revealed that the proportion of children with GMD delay (relative to their peers) increased significantly from 9 to 54 months for all three groups, but the increase was greater for those with autism concerns (OR = 1.28, 95% CI = 1.08–1.52) or an autism diagnosis (OR = 1.26, 95% CI = 1.10–1.43) compared to the no autism group (OR = 1.06, 95% CI = 1.02–1.10). Differences in the changes in GMD performance among children with an autism diagnosis compared to those without autism occurred between 9 and 24 months (OR = 2.16, 95% CI = 1.13–4.13). No significant GMD delay differences were found at any time between children with an autism diagnosis versus those with autism concerns. Children with a GMD delay should be screened for autism at 24 m. Early identification is the first step toward knowledge-based, effective intervention of developmental difficulties.
本研究对来自新西兰纵向队列研究的6359名有或无自闭症儿童的大肌肉运动发展(GMD)轨迹进行了研究。到8岁时,173名儿童要么被诊断为自闭症(n = 108),要么被父母报告有自闭症问题(n = 65)。母亲在孩子9个月、24个月和54个月时报告了大运动里程碑。我们发现,与自闭症诊断无关,24个月大的GMD延迟在女孩、早产儿童和母亲是欧洲人的儿童中更有可能发生。控制产前母婴协变量的混合效应logistic回归模型显示,在所有三组中,从9个月到54个月,GMD延迟儿童的比例(相对于同龄人)显著增加,但与无自闭症组相比,有自闭症担忧的儿童(OR = 1.28, 95% CI = 1.08-1.52)或有自闭症诊断的儿童(OR = 1.26, 95% CI = 1.10-1.43)的比例增加更大(OR = 1.06, 95% CI = 1.02-1.10)。诊断为自闭症的儿童与未诊断为自闭症的儿童的GMD表现变化的差异发生在9至24个月之间(OR = 2.16, 95% CI = 1.13-4.13)。在诊断为自闭症的儿童和有自闭症顾虑的儿童之间,在任何时候都没有发现显著的GMD延迟差异。GMD延迟的儿童应在24岁时进行自闭症筛查。早期识别是迈向以知识为基础,有效干预发展困难的第一步。
{"title":"Gross Motor Development in Children With Autism: Longitudinal Trajectories From the Growing Up in New Zealand Study","authors":"Paula Araya, Katrina Phillips, Karen Waldie, Lisa Underwood","doi":"10.1002/aur.3304","DOIUrl":"10.1002/aur.3304","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study explored gross motor development (GMD) trajectories among 6359 children, with and without autism, from the <i>Growing Up in New Zealand</i> longitudinal cohort study. By the age of 8, 173 children had either an autism diagnosis (<i>n</i> = 108) or parent-reported autism concerns (<i>n</i> = 65). Gross motor milestones were reported by mothers when children were 9, 24, and 54 months of age. We found that irrespective of autism diagnosis, GMD delays at 24 months of age were more likely among girls, children born preterm, and those whose mothers identified as European. A mixed-effect logistic regression model, controlling for antenatal maternal and child covariates, revealed that the proportion of children with GMD delay (relative to their peers) increased significantly from 9 to 54 months for all three groups, but the increase was greater for those with autism concerns (OR = 1.28, 95% CI = 1.08–1.52) or an autism diagnosis (OR = 1.26, 95% CI = 1.10–1.43) compared to the no autism group (OR = 1.06, 95% CI = 1.02–1.10). Differences in the changes in GMD performance among children with an autism diagnosis compared to those without autism occurred between 9 and 24 months (OR = 2.16, 95% CI = 1.13–4.13). No significant GMD delay differences were found at any time between children with an autism diagnosis versus those with autism concerns. Children with a GMD delay should be screened for autism at 24 m. Early identification is the first step toward knowledge-based, effective intervention of developmental difficulties.</p>","PeriodicalId":131,"journal":{"name":"Autism Research","volume":"18 2","pages":"437-448"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aur.3304","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143017291","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Kristen Lyall, Aisha S. Dickerson, Annette M. Green, Seth Frndak, Lisa A. Croen, Jennifer L. Ames, Lyndsay A. Avalos, Judy L. Aschner, Nicole R. Bush, Carlos A. Camargo Jr, Viren D'Sa, Stephen R. Dager, Anne L. Dunlop, Assiamira Ferrara, Jody M. Ganiban, James E. Gern, Tre D. Gissandaner, J. Carolyn Graff, Irva Hertz-Picciotto, Alison E. Hipwell, Tengfei Ma, Meghan Miller, Laura Murphy, Margaret R. Karagas, Rachel S. Kelly, Amy Margolis, Daphne Koinis-Mitchell, Cindy T. McEvoy, Daniel Messinger, Ruby Nguyen, Emily Oken, Sally Ozonoff, Grier P. Page, Susan L. Schantz, Rebecca J. Schmidt, Coral L. Shuster, Julie B. Schweitzer, Stephen J. Sheinkopf, Joseph B. Stanford, Cindy O. Trevino, Scott T. Weiss, Heather E. Volk, Robert M. Joseph, program collaborators for Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes
Prevalence of autism diagnosis has historically differed by demographic factors. Using data from 8224 participants drawn from the Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) Program, we examined relationships between demographic factors and parent-reported autism-related traits as captured by the Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS; T score > 65) and compared these to relations with parent-reported clinician diagnosis of ASD, in generalized linear mixed effects regression analyses. Results suggested lower odds of autism diagnosis, but not of SRS T > 65, for non-Hispanic Black children (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 0.76, 95% CI 0.55, 1.06) relative to non-Hispanic White children. Higher maternal education was associated with reduced odds of both outcomes (OR = 0.73, 95% CI 0.51, 1.05 for ASD autism diagnosis and 0.4, 95% CI 0.29, 0.55 for SRS score). In addition, results suggested a lower likelihood of autism diagnosis but a higher likelihood of an SRS score > 65 in Black girls. Findings suggest lower diagnostic recognition of autism in non-Hispanic Black children, despite a similar degree of SRS-assessed autism-related traits falling in the clinically elevated range. Further work is needed to address this disparity.
自闭症诊断的患病率历来因人口因素而异。使用来自儿童健康结果环境影响(ECHO)项目的8224名参与者的数据,我们研究了人口因素与父母报告的自闭症相关特征之间的关系,这些特征由社会反应性量表(SRS;在广义线性混合效应回归分析中,将这些与父母报告的ASD临床医生诊断的关系进行比较。结果显示,与非西班牙裔白人儿童相比,非西班牙裔黑人儿童的自闭症诊断几率较低,但SRS T = 0.65的几率不高(校正优势比[OR] = 0.76, 95% CI 0.55, 1.06)。较高的母亲教育程度与两种结果的发生率降低相关(ASD自闭症诊断OR = 0.73, 95% CI 0.51, 1.05, SRS评分OR = 0.4, 95% CI 0.29, 0.55)。此外,研究结果还表明,黑人女孩被诊断为自闭症的可能性较低,但SRS得分为65分的可能性较高。研究结果表明,非西班牙裔黑人儿童对自闭症的诊断认可度较低,尽管相似程度的srs评估的自闭症相关特征在临床升高范围内。需要进一步的工作来解决这一差距。
{"title":"Demographic Correlates of Autism: How Do Associations Compare Between Diagnosis and a Quantitative Trait Measure?","authors":"Kristen Lyall, Aisha S. Dickerson, Annette M. Green, Seth Frndak, Lisa A. Croen, Jennifer L. Ames, Lyndsay A. Avalos, Judy L. Aschner, Nicole R. Bush, Carlos A. Camargo Jr, Viren D'Sa, Stephen R. Dager, Anne L. Dunlop, Assiamira Ferrara, Jody M. Ganiban, James E. Gern, Tre D. Gissandaner, J. Carolyn Graff, Irva Hertz-Picciotto, Alison E. Hipwell, Tengfei Ma, Meghan Miller, Laura Murphy, Margaret R. Karagas, Rachel S. Kelly, Amy Margolis, Daphne Koinis-Mitchell, Cindy T. McEvoy, Daniel Messinger, Ruby Nguyen, Emily Oken, Sally Ozonoff, Grier P. Page, Susan L. Schantz, Rebecca J. Schmidt, Coral L. Shuster, Julie B. Schweitzer, Stephen J. Sheinkopf, Joseph B. Stanford, Cindy O. Trevino, Scott T. Weiss, Heather E. Volk, Robert M. Joseph, program collaborators for Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes","doi":"10.1002/aur.3296","DOIUrl":"10.1002/aur.3296","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Prevalence of autism diagnosis has historically differed by demographic factors. Using data from 8224 participants drawn from the Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) Program, we examined relationships between demographic factors and parent-reported autism-related traits as captured by the Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS; <i>T</i> score > 65) and compared these to relations with parent-reported clinician diagnosis of ASD, in generalized linear mixed effects regression analyses. Results suggested lower odds of autism diagnosis, but not of SRS <i>T</i> > 65, for non-Hispanic Black children (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 0.76, 95% CI 0.55, 1.06) relative to non-Hispanic White children. Higher maternal education was associated with reduced odds of both outcomes (OR = 0.73, 95% CI 0.51, 1.05 for ASD autism diagnosis and 0.4, 95% CI 0.29, 0.55 for SRS score). In addition, results suggested a lower likelihood of autism diagnosis but a higher likelihood of an SRS score > 65 in Black girls. Findings suggest lower diagnostic recognition of autism in non-Hispanic Black children, despite a similar degree of SRS-assessed autism-related traits falling in the clinically elevated range. Further work is needed to address this disparity.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":131,"journal":{"name":"Autism Research","volume":"18 3","pages":"648-659"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142959796","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) display a variety of core and co-occurring difficulties in social, communication, everyday functioning, cognitive, motor, and language domains. Receiving a combination of services to accommodate needs of autistic individuals is essential for improving their future outcomes. During the COVID-19 pandemic, reduced service access negatively impacted autistic children's outcomes. This study aimed to examine the relationship between service receipt and parental perceived outcomes in autistic children while accounting for various demographic, child, and parental factors. We utilized parental COVID-19 impact survey data from the SPARK study (N = 6067). Ordinal logistic regression analyses were used to predict perceived child outcomes. Demographic, child, and parental factors were included in the prediction models. Service receipt of SLT, ABA, PT/OT, MED, and MH were associated with perceived child outcomes. PT/OT and ABA predicted improvements in domains of social interaction, everyday activity, and overall autism severity; SLT and ABA contributed to improved perceived communication outcomes. Receiving MH and MED services was associated with worsening of perceived outcomes on all domains. Younger age, males, higher family income, lower autism severity, lower motor, function, and cognitive delay, greater language delay, and the absence of parental mental health issues were associated with greater improvements in various perceived outcomes. Overall, PT/OT and ABA services are associated with improved perceived social and functional outcomes whereas SLT and ABA services are associated with improved perceived communication outcomes. We also provide a wholistic view of factors affecting relationships between service receipt and perceived child outcomes during the pandemic.
{"title":"Relationship between service receipt during the COVID-19 pandemic and autistic children's multisystem outcomes and autism severity: A SPARK dataset analysis","authors":"Jung-Mei Tsai, Anjana Bhat","doi":"10.1002/aur.3256","DOIUrl":"10.1002/aur.3256","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) display a variety of core and co-occurring difficulties in social, communication, everyday functioning, cognitive, motor, and language domains. Receiving a combination of services to accommodate needs of autistic individuals is essential for improving their future outcomes. During the COVID-19 pandemic, reduced service access negatively impacted autistic children's outcomes. This study aimed to examine the relationship between service receipt and parental perceived outcomes in autistic children while accounting for various demographic, child, and parental factors. We utilized parental COVID-19 impact survey data from the SPARK study (<i>N</i> = 6067). Ordinal logistic regression analyses were used to predict perceived child outcomes. Demographic, child, and parental factors were included in the prediction models. Service receipt of SLT, ABA, PT/OT, MED, and MH were associated with perceived child outcomes. PT/OT and ABA predicted improvements in domains of social interaction, everyday activity, and overall autism severity; SLT and ABA contributed to improved perceived communication outcomes. Receiving MH and MED services was associated with worsening of perceived outcomes on all domains. Younger age, males, higher family income, lower autism severity, lower motor, function, and cognitive delay, greater language delay, and the absence of parental mental health issues were associated with greater improvements in various perceived outcomes. Overall, PT/OT and ABA services are associated with improved perceived social and functional outcomes whereas SLT and ABA services are associated with improved perceived communication outcomes. We also provide a wholistic view of factors affecting relationships between service receipt and perceived child outcomes during the pandemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":131,"journal":{"name":"Autism Research","volume":"18 1","pages":"217-229"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143069988","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Margaret L. McAllister, Tyler McFayden, Clare Harrop
Echolalia, the immediate or delayed repetition of speech, is a core diagnostic criterion for autism spectrum disorder. It has been studied for over 50 years and is well-described; however, no consensus on prevalence estimates exists for echolalia's occurrence in autistic youth. The current study sought to (1) describe endorsement of echolalia-related items using parent-, teacher-, and clinician-reports in a well-validated sample of autistic youth and (2) characterize relations between echolalia and other key factors, including age, language ability, and repetitive behaviors. Participants (n = 2555, 4–17 years, 13% female, 78% White) from the Simon Simplex Collection provided data from multi-informant ratings of echolalia and related behaviors. Nine parent-, clinician-, and teacher-report items were extracted from five measures to broadly capture echolalia through a composite score. Results indicated that as many as 90% of autistic individuals express echolalia at some point in their development. Hierarchical linear regression was conducted to evaluate relations between echolalia, verbal ability, and repetitive behaviors, controlling for age, sex, and autism severity. Results indicated the main effects of verbal ability and repetitive behaviors. A significant interaction qualified this main effect wherein age was negatively associated with echolalia for children with higher verbal ability, but not those with lower verbal ability, suggesting that adolescents with less generative speech may leverage echolalia as a communicative strategy. Echolalia was positively associated with repetitive behaviors across development. These associations support a dualistic interpretation of echolalia as functional communication and as a form of repetitive behavior. Future research is needed to understand the developmental trajectories of echolalia and develop affirming support for this autistic behavior.
{"title":"Reports of Echolalia and Related Behaviors in Autism From Parents, Teachers, and Clinicians: Evidence From the Simon Simplex Collection","authors":"Margaret L. McAllister, Tyler McFayden, Clare Harrop","doi":"10.1002/aur.3298","DOIUrl":"10.1002/aur.3298","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Echolalia, the immediate or delayed repetition of speech, is a core diagnostic criterion for autism spectrum disorder. It has been studied for over 50 years and is well-described; however, no consensus on prevalence estimates exists for echolalia's occurrence in autistic youth. The current study sought to (1) describe endorsement of echolalia-related items using parent-, teacher-, and clinician-reports in a well-validated sample of autistic youth and (2) characterize relations between echolalia and other key factors, including age, language ability, and repetitive behaviors. Participants (<i>n</i> = 2555, 4–17 years, 13% female, 78% White) from the Simon Simplex Collection provided data from multi-informant ratings of echolalia and related behaviors. Nine parent-, clinician-, and teacher-report items were extracted from five measures to broadly capture echolalia through a composite score. Results indicated that as many as 90% of autistic individuals express echolalia at some point in their development. Hierarchical linear regression was conducted to evaluate relations between echolalia, verbal ability, and repetitive behaviors, controlling for age, sex, and autism severity. Results indicated the main effects of verbal ability and repetitive behaviors. A significant interaction qualified this main effect wherein age was negatively associated with echolalia for children with higher verbal ability, but not those with lower verbal ability, suggesting that adolescents with less generative speech may leverage echolalia as a communicative strategy. Echolalia was positively associated with repetitive behaviors across development. These associations support a dualistic interpretation of echolalia as functional communication and as a form of repetitive behavior. Future research is needed to understand the developmental trajectories of echolalia and develop affirming support for this autistic behavior.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":131,"journal":{"name":"Autism Research","volume":"18 3","pages":"528-540"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143675033","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Yu Wang, Aihua Cao, Jing Wang, He Bai, Tianci Liu, Chenxi Sun, Zhuoran Li, Yuchun Tang, Feifei Xu, Shuwei Liu
The cerebellum plays a crucial role in functions, including sensory-motor coordination, cognition, and emotional processing. Compared to the neocortex, the human cerebellum exhibits a protracted developmental trajectory. This delayed developmental timeline may lead to increased sensitivity of the cerebellum to external influences, potentially extending the vulnerability period for neurological disorders. Abnormal cerebellar development in individuals with autism has been confirmed, and these atypical cerebellar changes may affect the development of the neocortex. However, due to the heterogeneity of autism spectrum disorder (ASD), the regional changes in the cerebellum and cerebellocerebral structural relationship remain unknown. To address these issues, we utilized imaging methods optimized for the cerebellum and cerebrum on 817 individuals aged 5–18 years in the ABIDE II dataset. After FDR correction, significant differences between groups were found in the right crus II/VIIB and vermis VI-VII. Structural covariance analysis revealed enhanced structural covariance in individuals with autism between the cerebellum and parahippocampal gyrus, pars opercularis, and transverse temporal gyrus in the right hemisphere after FDR correction. Furthermore, the structural covariance between the cerebellum and some regions of the cerebrum varied across sexes. A significant increase in structural covariance between the cerebellum and specific subcortical structures was also observed in individuals with ASD. Our study found atypical patterns in the structural covariance between the cerebellum and cerebrum in individuals with autism, which suggested that the underlying pathological processes of ASD might concurrently affect these brain regions. This study provided insight into the potential of cerebellocerebral pathways as therapeutic targets for ASD.
{"title":"Abnormalities in cerebellar subregions' volume and cerebellocerebral structural covariance in autism spectrum disorder","authors":"Yu Wang, Aihua Cao, Jing Wang, He Bai, Tianci Liu, Chenxi Sun, Zhuoran Li, Yuchun Tang, Feifei Xu, Shuwei Liu","doi":"10.1002/aur.3287","DOIUrl":"10.1002/aur.3287","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The cerebellum plays a crucial role in functions, including sensory-motor coordination, cognition, and emotional processing. Compared to the neocortex, the human cerebellum exhibits a protracted developmental trajectory. This delayed developmental timeline may lead to increased sensitivity of the cerebellum to external influences, potentially extending the vulnerability period for neurological disorders. Abnormal cerebellar development in individuals with autism has been confirmed, and these atypical cerebellar changes may affect the development of the neocortex. However, due to the heterogeneity of autism spectrum disorder (ASD), the regional changes in the cerebellum and cerebellocerebral structural relationship remain unknown. To address these issues, we utilized imaging methods optimized for the cerebellum and cerebrum on 817 individuals aged 5–18 years in the ABIDE II dataset. After FDR correction, significant differences between groups were found in the right crus II/VIIB and vermis VI-VII. Structural covariance analysis revealed enhanced structural covariance in individuals with autism between the cerebellum and parahippocampal gyrus, pars opercularis, and transverse temporal gyrus in the right hemisphere after FDR correction. Furthermore, the structural covariance between the cerebellum and some regions of the cerebrum varied across sexes. A significant increase in structural covariance between the cerebellum and specific subcortical structures was also observed in individuals with ASD. Our study found atypical patterns in the structural covariance between the cerebellum and cerebrum in individuals with autism, which suggested that the underlying pathological processes of ASD might concurrently affect these brain regions. This study provided insight into the potential of cerebellocerebral pathways as therapeutic targets for ASD.</p>","PeriodicalId":131,"journal":{"name":"Autism Research","volume":"18 1","pages":"83-97"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11782717/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142924163","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a complex neurodevelopmental disorder and its underlying neuroanatomical mechanisms still remain unclear. The scaled subprofile model of principal component analysis (SSM-PCA) is a data-driven multivariate technique for capturing stable disease-related spatial covariance pattern. Here, SSM-PCA is innovatively applied to obtain robust ASD-related gray matter volume pattern associated with clinical symptoms. We utilized T1-weighted structural MRI images (sMRI) of 576 subjects (288 ASDs and 288 typically developing (TD) controls) aged 7–29 years from the Autism Brain Imaging Data Exchange II (ABIDE II) dataset. These images were analyzed with SSM-PCA to identify the ASD-related spatial covariance pattern. Subsequently, we investigated the relationship between the pattern and clinical symptoms and verified its robustness. Then, the applicability of the pattern under different age stages were further explored. The results revealed that the ASD-related pattern primarily involves the thalamus, putamen, parahippocampus, orbitofrontal cortex, and cerebellum. The expression of this pattern correlated with Social Response Scale and Social Communication Questionnaire scores. Moreover, the ASD-related pattern was robust for the ABIDE I dataset. Regarding the applicability of the pattern for different age stages, the effect sizes of its expression in ASD were medium in the children and adults, while small in adolescents. This study identified a robust ASD-related pattern based on gray matter volume that is associated with social deficits. Our findings provide new insights into the neuroanatomical mechanisms of ASD and may facilitate its future intervention.
{"title":"Robust Autism Spectrum Disorder-Related Spatial Covariance Gray Matter Pattern Revealed With a Large-Scale Multi-Center Dataset","authors":"Sheng-Zhi Ma, Xing-Ke Wang, Chen Yang, Wen-Qiang Dong, Dan-Dan Chen, Chao Song, Qiu-Rong Zhang, Yu-Feng Zang, Li-Xia Yuan","doi":"10.1002/aur.3303","DOIUrl":"10.1002/aur.3303","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a complex neurodevelopmental disorder and its underlying neuroanatomical mechanisms still remain unclear. The scaled subprofile model of principal component analysis (SSM-PCA) is a data-driven multivariate technique for capturing stable disease-related spatial covariance pattern. Here, SSM-PCA is innovatively applied to obtain robust ASD-related gray matter volume pattern associated with clinical symptoms. We utilized T1-weighted structural MRI images (sMRI) of 576 subjects (288 ASDs and 288 typically developing (TD) controls) aged 7–29 years from the Autism Brain Imaging Data Exchange II (ABIDE II) dataset. These images were analyzed with SSM-PCA to identify the ASD-related spatial covariance pattern. Subsequently, we investigated the relationship between the pattern and clinical symptoms and verified its robustness. Then, the applicability of the pattern under different age stages were further explored. The results revealed that the ASD-related pattern primarily involves the thalamus, putamen, parahippocampus, orbitofrontal cortex, and cerebellum. The expression of this pattern correlated with Social Response Scale and Social Communication Questionnaire scores. Moreover, the ASD-related pattern was robust for the ABIDE I dataset. Regarding the applicability of the pattern for different age stages, the effect sizes of its expression in ASD were medium in the children and adults, while small in adolescents. This study identified a robust ASD-related pattern based on gray matter volume that is associated with social deficits. Our findings provide new insights into the neuroanatomical mechanisms of ASD and may facilitate its future intervention.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":131,"journal":{"name":"Autism Research","volume":"18 2","pages":"312-324"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142907749","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}