{"title":"Introduction to the Symposium on Daniel Groll's Conceiving People","authors":"A. MacLachlan","doi":"10.3138/ijfab-2022-0023","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3138/ijfab-2022-0023","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":13383,"journal":{"name":"IJFAB: International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics","volume":"220 1","pages":"163 - 165"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77491145","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Significant Interests and the Right to Know","authors":"Reuven Brandt","doi":"10.3138/ijfab-2022-0022","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3138/ijfab-2022-0022","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":13383,"journal":{"name":"IJFAB: International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics","volume":"24 1","pages":"201 - 213"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78176425","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Shehani Jayawickrama, G. Loutrianakis, Kathleen Vincent, L. Campo-Engelstein
Abstract:We argue the dearth of research on elite ciswomen athletes' reproductive health is because athletics remains associated with masculinity, and female athletes therefore do not adhere to normative femininity and motherhood. In choosing a masculine career, it is assumed that elite athletes will reject other feminine activities, such as motherhood. We further argue that female athletes are considered especially ineligible for motherhood because their career choice violates normative motherhood by engaging in "risky" behavior (i.e., physical activity). By continuing with their career, athletes are accused of being "bad" mothers by not adhering to the gender norm of mothers as self-sacrificing.
{"title":"Air Ball: Missing the Net on Female Elite Athletes' Reproductive Health","authors":"Shehani Jayawickrama, G. Loutrianakis, Kathleen Vincent, L. Campo-Engelstein","doi":"10.3138/ijfab-2022-0004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3138/ijfab-2022-0004","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:We argue the dearth of research on elite ciswomen athletes' reproductive health is because athletics remains associated with masculinity, and female athletes therefore do not adhere to normative femininity and motherhood. In choosing a masculine career, it is assumed that elite athletes will reject other feminine activities, such as motherhood. We further argue that female athletes are considered especially ineligible for motherhood because their career choice violates normative motherhood by engaging in \"risky\" behavior (i.e., physical activity). By continuing with their career, athletes are accused of being \"bad\" mothers by not adhering to the gender norm of mothers as self-sacrificing.","PeriodicalId":13383,"journal":{"name":"IJFAB: International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics","volume":"38 S1","pages":"21 - 33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"91548797","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Anonymous Versus Open Donation and Queerness as Political: Comments on Groll's Conceiving People","authors":"Amanda Roth","doi":"10.3138/ijfab-2022-0020","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3138/ijfab-2022-0020","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":13383,"journal":{"name":"IJFAB: International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics","volume":"76 9 1","pages":"166 - 181"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"91032319","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Abstract:This paper aims to problematize pregnancy and support the development of a safe alternative method of gestation. Our arguments engage with the health risks of gestation and childbirth, the value assigned to pregnancy, as well as social and medical attitudes toward women's pain, especially in labor. We claim that the harm caused by pregnancy and childbirth provides a prima facie case in favor of prioritizing research on a method of extra corporeal gestation.
{"title":"Beyond Pregnancy: A Public Health Case for a Technological Alternative","authors":"Andrea Bidoli, E. Nucci","doi":"10.3138/ijfab-2022-0008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3138/ijfab-2022-0008","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This paper aims to problematize pregnancy and support the development of a safe alternative method of gestation. Our arguments engage with the health risks of gestation and childbirth, the value assigned to pregnancy, as well as social and medical attitudes toward women's pain, especially in labor. We claim that the harm caused by pregnancy and childbirth provides a prima facie case in favor of prioritizing research on a method of extra corporeal gestation.","PeriodicalId":13383,"journal":{"name":"IJFAB: International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics","volume":"7 1","pages":"103 - 130"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"87366176","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Floor A H Cuijpers, M. Muntinga, M. Bakker, Gönül Dilaver, M. van den Hoven, P. Verdonk
Abstract:Ethical guidelines protecting medical research participants have been criticized for stripping the sociocultural contexts of research. This critique is urgent considering ongoing calls to account for participant diversity in recruitment and inclusion procedures. Our intersectional analysis of illness narratives explores how sociostructural factors might play a role in participants' exposure to research-related harm in clinical trials. Although widening participation does respond to generalizability concerns, we argue that gendered, classed, and ableist processes of self-silencing could simultaneously enhance risk of harm for participants with multiple oppressed identities. To prevent this, researchers might actively involve participants when designing trials.
{"title":"\"Who Am I to Judge These Things\": Intersectional Dimensions of Self-Silencing of People with a Neuromuscular Disease in a Clinical Trial","authors":"Floor A H Cuijpers, M. Muntinga, M. Bakker, Gönül Dilaver, M. van den Hoven, P. Verdonk","doi":"10.3138/ijfab.15.2.04","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3138/ijfab.15.2.04","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Ethical guidelines protecting medical research participants have been criticized for stripping the sociocultural contexts of research. This critique is urgent considering ongoing calls to account for participant diversity in recruitment and inclusion procedures. Our intersectional analysis of illness narratives explores how sociostructural factors might play a role in participants' exposure to research-related harm in clinical trials. Although widening participation does respond to generalizability concerns, we argue that gendered, classed, and ableist processes of self-silencing could simultaneously enhance risk of harm for participants with multiple oppressed identities. To prevent this, researchers might actively involve participants when designing trials.","PeriodicalId":13383,"journal":{"name":"IJFAB: International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics","volume":"39 1","pages":"51 - 75"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74279935","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
emphasis subspecializations. Minor She specializes in bioethics with an emphasis on assisted reproductive technology and aging and long-term care. Her current work addresses motherhood in reproductive technologies and ethical issues relating to elder care and technology.
{"title":"McLeod's Conscience in Reproductive Health Care and Its Relationship to Reproductive Freedom and Faith-Based Healthcare","authors":"J. Parks","doi":"10.3138/ijfab.15.2.13","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3138/ijfab.15.2.13","url":null,"abstract":"emphasis subspecializations. Minor She specializes in bioethics with an emphasis on assisted reproductive technology and aging and long-term care. Her current work addresses motherhood in reproductive technologies and ethical issues relating to elder care and technology.","PeriodicalId":13383,"journal":{"name":"IJFAB: International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics","volume":"1 1","pages":"153 - 160"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"83004315","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Trusted Doctor: Medical Ethics and Professionalism by Rosamond Rhodes","authors":"Elizabeth Lanphier","doi":"10.3138/ijfab-2022-0003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3138/ijfab-2022-0003","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":13383,"journal":{"name":"IJFAB: International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics","volume":"47 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"91399965","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
As the other entries in this section have surely made clear, Carolyn McLeod’s outstanding monograph, Conscience in Reproductive Health Care: Prioritizing Patient Interests (2020), is fertile ground for fruitful philosophical analyses of issues pertaining to conscience, trust, autonomy, and more, all of which are sure to be of great interest and benefit to scholars in areas such as bioethics, health policy, and feminist ethics. Conscience in Reproductive Health Care provides a compelling response to a timely bioethical dilemma: What do we do when healthcare providers refuse certain health services to patients on grounds of conscience? McLeod contends that healthcare providers, in light of their fiduciary responsibilities to patients, ought to prioritize their patients’ interests in receiving quality healthcare over their own interests in upholding their conscience. This view, which McLeod calls “the prioritizing approach” to conscientious objection, takes a stronger stance regarding the obligations that healthcare providers have to perform certain legally and medically accepted reproductive services (e.g., abortion services) than many mainstream approaches to the problem of conscientious refusal, which primarily focus on the centrality of compromise in adjudicating between providers’ and patients’ interests. With this unwitting commitment to upholding patient interests (and especially the interests of already vulnerable patients), McLeod has offered an account of providers’ duties which is well-equipped to uphold several core bioethical principles: the imperative to respect patient autonomy, the need to promote patient wellbeing, and the desire to avoid unnecessary harm to patients. For these and other reasons, McLeod has offered a compelling theory of when conscientious refusal is morally appropriate, which puts patients’ needs and interests at the forefront. In what follows, I will withhold a detailed discussion of McLeod’s main arguments and contributions, as these can be reviewed in McLeod’s contribution to this issue. Substantive analyses of McLeod’s book are also available to the reader in this issue, including commentaries from Alison Reiheld, Jennifer 10.3138/ijfab.15.2.15 15 2
{"title":"Extensions, Applications, and New Directions for Thinking About McLeod's Conscience in Reproductive Health Care","authors":"Heather Stewart","doi":"10.3138/ijfab.15.2.15","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3138/ijfab.15.2.15","url":null,"abstract":"As the other entries in this section have surely made clear, Carolyn McLeod’s outstanding monograph, Conscience in Reproductive Health Care: Prioritizing Patient Interests (2020), is fertile ground for fruitful philosophical analyses of issues pertaining to conscience, trust, autonomy, and more, all of which are sure to be of great interest and benefit to scholars in areas such as bioethics, health policy, and feminist ethics. Conscience in Reproductive Health Care provides a compelling response to a timely bioethical dilemma: What do we do when healthcare providers refuse certain health services to patients on grounds of conscience? McLeod contends that healthcare providers, in light of their fiduciary responsibilities to patients, ought to prioritize their patients’ interests in receiving quality healthcare over their own interests in upholding their conscience. This view, which McLeod calls “the prioritizing approach” to conscientious objection, takes a stronger stance regarding the obligations that healthcare providers have to perform certain legally and medically accepted reproductive services (e.g., abortion services) than many mainstream approaches to the problem of conscientious refusal, which primarily focus on the centrality of compromise in adjudicating between providers’ and patients’ interests. With this unwitting commitment to upholding patient interests (and especially the interests of already vulnerable patients), McLeod has offered an account of providers’ duties which is well-equipped to uphold several core bioethical principles: the imperative to respect patient autonomy, the need to promote patient wellbeing, and the desire to avoid unnecessary harm to patients. For these and other reasons, McLeod has offered a compelling theory of when conscientious refusal is morally appropriate, which puts patients’ needs and interests at the forefront. In what follows, I will withhold a detailed discussion of McLeod’s main arguments and contributions, as these can be reviewed in McLeod’s contribution to this issue. Substantive analyses of McLeod’s book are also available to the reader in this issue, including commentaries from Alison Reiheld, Jennifer 10.3138/ijfab.15.2.15 15 2","PeriodicalId":13383,"journal":{"name":"IJFAB: International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics","volume":"60 1","pages":"167 - 173"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85158680","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Maya J. Goldenberg's (2021) I Vaccine Hesitancy: Public Trust, Expertise, and the War on Science i argues that vaccines are about much more than vaccines, and vaccine hesitancy reflects the cultural anxieties of the moment (as the histories and geographies of vaccine hesitancy and refusal show). Reflecting on a prepandemic monograph on vaccine hesitancy two years into the COVID-19 pandemic demands answer to the questions whether the analysis still holds and whether it offers sufficient resources to address the current situation. This was the point of discussion at a 2022 book panel on I Vaccine Hesitancy: Public Trust, Expertise, and the War on Science i , featuring author Maya J. Goldenberg and respondents Miriam Solomon and Inmaculada De Melo-Martin. [Extracted from the article] Copyright of International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics is the property of University of Toronto Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full . (Copyright applies to all s.)
玛雅·j·戈登伯格(Maya J. Goldenberg, 2021)的《疫苗犹豫:公众信任、专业知识和对科学的战争》一书认为，疫苗的意义远不止于疫苗，疫苗犹豫反映了当下的文化焦虑(正如疫苗犹豫和拒绝的历史和地理所显示的那样)。反思关于COVID-19大流行两年后疫苗犹豫的大流行前专著，需要回答以下问题:该分析是否仍然成立，以及它是否提供了足够的资源来应对当前形势。这是2022年《疫苗犹豫:公众信任、专业知识和对科学的战争》一书小组讨论的重点，作者玛雅·j·戈登伯格和受访者米里亚姆·所罗门和因玛库拉达·德梅洛-马丁参与了讨论。《国际女性主义生物伦理学研究期刊》版权归多伦多大学出版社所有，未经版权所有者明确书面许可，其内容不得复制或通过电子邮件发送到多个网站或发布到listserv。但是，用户可以打印、下载或通过电子邮件发送文章供个人使用。这可以删节。对副本的准确性不作任何保证。用户应参阅原始出版版本的材料的完整。(版权适用于所有人。)
{"title":"Author Meets Critics: An Introduction","authors":"Maya J Goldenberg","doi":"10.3138/ijfab.15.2.06","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3138/ijfab.15.2.06","url":null,"abstract":"Maya J. Goldenberg's (2021) I Vaccine Hesitancy: Public Trust, Expertise, and the War on Science i argues that vaccines are about much more than vaccines, and vaccine hesitancy reflects the cultural anxieties of the moment (as the histories and geographies of vaccine hesitancy and refusal show). Reflecting on a prepandemic monograph on vaccine hesitancy two years into the COVID-19 pandemic demands answer to the questions whether the analysis still holds and whether it offers sufficient resources to address the current situation. This was the point of discussion at a 2022 book panel on I Vaccine Hesitancy: Public Trust, Expertise, and the War on Science i , featuring author Maya J. Goldenberg and respondents Miriam Solomon and Inmaculada De Melo-Martin. [Extracted from the article] Copyright of International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics is the property of University of Toronto Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full . (Copyright applies to all s.)","PeriodicalId":13383,"journal":{"name":"IJFAB: International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics","volume":"26 1","pages":"99 - 99"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"81465502","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：