{"title":"McLeod’s Conscience in Reproductive Health Care: Fiduciary Duties Beyond Reproductive Care, the Role of the Pharmacist, and the Harms and Wrongs of Conscientious Refusals","authors":"J. Perez Gomez","doi":"10.3138/ijfab.15.2.11","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3138/ijfab.15.2.11","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":13383,"journal":{"name":"IJFAB: International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics","volume":"275 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77987629","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Vaccines aren’t a partisan issue. The consensus in favor of vaccination in this country is very strong and extends across every religious, racial and political group…. There’s no reason it should be otherwise—communicable diseases don’t care what party you support. (Haelle 2015)
{"title":"Normative Theory and the COVID Pandemic: Author's Response to Miriam Solomon and Inmaculada de Melo-Martín","authors":"Maya J Goldenberg","doi":"10.3138/ijfab.15.2.09","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3138/ijfab.15.2.09","url":null,"abstract":"Vaccines aren’t a partisan issue. The consensus in favor of vaccination in this country is very strong and extends across every religious, racial and political group…. There’s no reason it should be otherwise—communicable diseases don’t care what party you support. (Haelle 2015)","PeriodicalId":13383,"journal":{"name":"IJFAB: International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics","volume":"44 1","pages":"116 - 130"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88080806","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Abstract:Lack of time is a commonly reported barrier to healthy eating, but a literal lack of time is only one way that time may compromise eating well. This article explores how the first-personal lived experience of time shapes and is shaped by eating. I draw upon phenomenology and feminist theory to argue that the dynamic relationship between eating and temporality matters for food ethics. Specifically, temporalities and related ways of eating can be better or worse vis-à-vis key ethical concerns. I highlight the possibility of altering temporalities through strategic eating and consider implications for individual food choice and structural change.
{"title":"Time to Eat: The Importance of Temporality for Food Ethics","authors":"Megan A. Dean","doi":"10.3138/ijfab.15.2.05","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3138/ijfab.15.2.05","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Lack of time is a commonly reported barrier to healthy eating, but a literal lack of time is only one way that time may compromise eating well. This article explores how the first-personal lived experience of time shapes and is shaped by eating. I draw upon phenomenology and feminist theory to argue that the dynamic relationship between eating and temporality matters for food ethics. Specifically, temporalities and related ways of eating can be better or worse vis-à-vis key ethical concerns. I highlight the possibility of altering temporalities through strategic eating and consider implications for individual food choice and structural change.","PeriodicalId":13383,"journal":{"name":"IJFAB: International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics","volume":"5 1","pages":"76 - 98"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78774873","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The debates regarding vaccine hesitancy and refusal, Goldenberg argues, do not represent a war on science. If those who hesitate about childhood or COVID-19 vaccines trusted scientists and public health experts, they would be ensuring that children and themselves receive appropriate vaccines, the mantra goes. Witness for instance the cases of people willing to take experimental treatments against COVID-19, such as monoclonal antibodies, while they refuse COVID-19 vaccines on grounds that vaccines are experimental. [Extracted from the article] Copyright of International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics is the property of University of Toronto Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full . (Copyright applies to all s.)
{"title":"Vaccine Hesitancy: Some Concerns About Values and Trust, Comments on Vaccine Hesitancy by Maya J. Goldenberg","authors":"Inmaculada de Melo-Martín","doi":"10.3138/ijfab.15.2.08","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3138/ijfab.15.2.08","url":null,"abstract":"The debates regarding vaccine hesitancy and refusal, Goldenberg argues, do not represent a war on science. If those who hesitate about childhood or COVID-19 vaccines trusted scientists and public health experts, they would be ensuring that children and themselves receive appropriate vaccines, the mantra goes. Witness for instance the cases of people willing to take experimental treatments against COVID-19, such as monoclonal antibodies, while they refuse COVID-19 vaccines on grounds that vaccines are experimental. [Extracted from the article] Copyright of International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics is the property of University of Toronto Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full . (Copyright applies to all s.)","PeriodicalId":13383,"journal":{"name":"IJFAB: International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics","volume":"99 1","pages":"108 - 115"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85918129","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Goldenberg is calling for a "meeting of minds": a human encounter between the public health leadership and vaccine hesitators through a respectful engagement that interprets what vaccine hesitators say and do charitably, with an openness to differences in values. At the same time, we are also familiar with the ways in which COVID-19 vaccine hesitators are apparently willing to trust the medical establishment and even the same pharmaceutical companies as produced the vaccine when they become ill from COVID-19. For example, Goldenberg thinks that parental concerns that their child is "too sickly" for the vaccine, and that the vaccine presents a greater risk for them than the disease in a mostly vaccinated society may be legitimate (32-34). [Extracted from the article] Copyright of International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics is the property of University of Toronto Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full . (Copyright applies to all s.)
{"title":"Taking the High Road: Comments on Maya J. Goldenberg, Vaccine Hesitancy:Public Trust, Expertise, and the War on Science","authors":"M. Solomon","doi":"10.3138/ijfab.15.2.07","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3138/ijfab.15.2.07","url":null,"abstract":"Goldenberg is calling for a \"meeting of minds\": a human encounter between the public health leadership and vaccine hesitators through a respectful engagement that interprets what vaccine hesitators say and do charitably, with an openness to differences in values. At the same time, we are also familiar with the ways in which COVID-19 vaccine hesitators are apparently willing to trust the medical establishment and even the same pharmaceutical companies as produced the vaccine when they become ill from COVID-19. For example, Goldenberg thinks that parental concerns that their child is \"too sickly\" for the vaccine, and that the vaccine presents a greater risk for them than the disease in a mostly vaccinated society may be legitimate (32-34). [Extracted from the article] Copyright of International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics is the property of University of Toronto Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full . (Copyright applies to all s.)","PeriodicalId":13383,"journal":{"name":"IJFAB: International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics","volume":"2 1","pages":"100 - 107"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78639657","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Abstract:This article explores post-cesarean shame to understand how normative birthing ideals are tied to neoliberal and popular feminist expectations of what it means to be a "good" mother. Drawing on narratives shared on motherhood blogs, we note that feelings of shame associated with cesareans are tied to social pressures for unmedicated, vaginal birth. Rather than critique nonmedical or "natural" birth, this article explores the affective implications of approaching birth as a curated and controllable process. We conclude with suggestions for practitioners, moms, and their supporters on how to make room for births that are not good.
{"title":"Making Room for Births That Are Not Good: Lessons from Cesarean Shame Shame","authors":"Kiera Keglowitsch, M. Meagher","doi":"10.3138/ijfab.15.2.02","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3138/ijfab.15.2.02","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article explores post-cesarean shame to understand how normative birthing ideals are tied to neoliberal and popular feminist expectations of what it means to be a \"good\" mother. Drawing on narratives shared on motherhood blogs, we note that feelings of shame associated with cesareans are tied to social pressures for unmedicated, vaginal birth. Rather than critique nonmedical or \"natural\" birth, this article explores the affective implications of approaching birth as a curated and controllable process. We conclude with suggestions for practitioners, moms, and their supporters on how to make room for births that are not good.","PeriodicalId":13383,"journal":{"name":"IJFAB: International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics","volume":"24 1","pages":"22 - 39"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78770320","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Thanks to the critics for their comments. I really appreciate the work they put into this, especially given how tired most academics are because of teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic. I especially appreciated getting the comments ahead of time, which allowed me to think carefully about how to respond to them—in the ten minutes I have for responses! I’ll focus mainly though not exclusively on critical comments, which I have reframed as questions. I’ll also respond to each critic in turn, starting with Javiera Perez Gomez.
{"title":"Responding to My \"Critics\"","authors":"Carolyn McLeod","doi":"10.3138/ijfab.15.2.14","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3138/ijfab.15.2.14","url":null,"abstract":"Thanks to the critics for their comments. I really appreciate the work they put into this, especially given how tired most academics are because of teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic. I especially appreciated getting the comments ahead of time, which allowed me to think carefully about how to respond to them—in the ten minutes I have for responses! I’ll focus mainly though not exclusively on critical comments, which I have reframed as questions. I’ll also respond to each critic in turn, starting with Javiera Perez Gomez.","PeriodicalId":13383,"journal":{"name":"IJFAB: International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics","volume":"870 ","pages":"161 - 166"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"91464329","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Abstract:At the 2022 Central American Philosophical Association meeting (Chicago, Illinois, February 23–26), there was an Author-Meets-Critics session on Carolyn McLeod's (2020) book, Conscience in Reproductive Health Care: Prioritizing Patient Interests. The event was organized and chaired by Heather Stewart and sponsored by the APA Committee on the Status of Women and Kate Norlock, chair of that committee. There were four speakers, including McLeod and three "critics": Javiera Perez Gomez, Alison Reinheld, and Jennifer Parks, who were all generous enough to provide McLeod with their comments beforehand. The sessions occurred over Zoom even though some speakers were present in person at the conference.McLeod kicked things off by providing a summary of her book, which was then followed by critical (and supportive!) comments by the critics in the order in which they're named above. McLeod responded to their remarks and then Stewart led a Q&A session with our small but lively and intelligent audience. The content of what was said has been reproduced here.
{"title":"A Summary of Conscience in Reproductive Health Care: Prioritizing Patient Interests","authors":"Carolyn McLeod","doi":"10.3138/ijfab.15.2.10","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3138/ijfab.15.2.10","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:At the 2022 Central American Philosophical Association meeting (Chicago, Illinois, February 23–26), there was an Author-Meets-Critics session on Carolyn McLeod's (2020) book, Conscience in Reproductive Health Care: Prioritizing Patient Interests. The event was organized and chaired by Heather Stewart and sponsored by the APA Committee on the Status of Women and Kate Norlock, chair of that committee. There were four speakers, including McLeod and three \"critics\": Javiera Perez Gomez, Alison Reinheld, and Jennifer Parks, who were all generous enough to provide McLeod with their comments beforehand. The sessions occurred over Zoom even though some speakers were present in person at the conference.McLeod kicked things off by providing a summary of her book, which was then followed by critical (and supportive!) comments by the critics in the order in which they're named above. McLeod responded to their remarks and then Stewart led a Q&A session with our small but lively and intelligent audience. The content of what was said has been reproduced here.","PeriodicalId":13383,"journal":{"name":"IJFAB: International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics","volume":"26 1","pages":"131 - 136"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77805359","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Abstract:Genetic information affects patients' families differently than other types of medical information. Family members might have a compelling interest in patients' genetic information, but who counts as family? In this article, I assess current definitions of family and propose a pluralistic account of family, which comprises definitions of family based on biomedical, legal, and functional aspects. Respectful of various forms of family, a pluralistic account includes those with interests in genetic information. Finally, I apply it in the hypothetical case of a sperm donor with a hereditary condition.
{"title":"Who Counts as Family: A Pluralistic Account of Family in the Genetic Context","authors":"Serene Ong","doi":"10.3138/ijfab.15.2.01","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3138/ijfab.15.2.01","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Genetic information affects patients' families differently than other types of medical information. Family members might have a compelling interest in patients' genetic information, but who counts as family? In this article, I assess current definitions of family and propose a pluralistic account of family, which comprises definitions of family based on biomedical, legal, and functional aspects. Respectful of various forms of family, a pluralistic account includes those with interests in genetic information. Finally, I apply it in the hypothetical case of a sperm donor with a hereditary condition.","PeriodicalId":13383,"journal":{"name":"IJFAB: International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics","volume":"37 1","pages":"1 - 21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85344028","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Freezing Fertility: Oocyte Cryopreservation and the Gender Politics of Aging by Lucy van de Wiel","authors":"M. De Proost","doi":"10.3138/ijfab-2022-0006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3138/ijfab-2022-0006","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":13383,"journal":{"name":"IJFAB: International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78549393","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：