To synthesise evidence for the incidence of intensive care unit (ICU) admission, characteristics and mortality of pregnant and postpartum women with a focus on differences between high-income countries (HICs) and low-middle-income countries (LMICs) and report changes in reported findings since the last review by Pollock et al. (2010).
We searched Ovid Medline, EMBASE, and CINAHL (2010–2023), following best practice guidelines for abstract screening for large-evidence systematic reviews. Patient and study characteristics of extracted studies were analysed descriptively. Multivariable meta-regression analysis, employing mixed-effects models, was conducted for assessing ICU admission and mortality. Studies reviewed by Pollock et al. were included to perform an overall analysis, including each study period and geographic region in a model.
Seventy-one eligible studies reported data on 111,601 women admitted to ICU, with 41,291,168 deliveries reported in 65 studies. Fifty-six studies were retrospective. Case definitions, admission criteria, and causes of mortality reported were heterogeneous. The pooled ICU admission rate was 1.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.28–1.99; I2 = 99.8%), 0.4% (95% CI 0.32–0.48, I2 = 99.9%) in HICs versus 2.8% (95% CI 0.65–6.4, I2 = 99.9%) in LMICs (p < 0.0001). The pooled ICU mortality rate among 140,780 admissions reported in 63 studies was 6.5% (95% CI 5.2–7.9; I2 = 98.7%), with mortality in HICs 1.4% (95% CI 0.8–2.1, I2 = 98.04%) lower than LMICs 12.4% (95% CI 8.1–17.5, I2 = 98.9%) (p < 0.0001). Multivariable meta-regression analysis found a significant association between the ICU admission rates (p = 0.0001) and mortality (p = 0.0003) with geographic region (HIC vs LMIC). Compared to the earlier study of Pollock et al. in 2010, there was an increase in reported studies (71 vs 40 in Pollock et al. study) and reported admissions (111,601 vs 7887 Pollock et al. study), particularly from LMICs’.
Mortality for critically ill peripartum women is substantial and the gap in reported ICU admissions and mortality for critically ill peripartum women between HIC and LMICs remains unacceptably high. The reports are often small and heterogeneous using many case definitions. Reporting standards focusing on critical care processes and outcomes and large multinational prospective studies are necessary to better understand and mitigate maternal and child health challenges as sustainable development goals in LMICs and HICs.
Spontaneous breathing trials (SBT) evaluate the patient's capacity to maintain inspiratory effort after extubation. SBT practices are heterogeneous and not individualised. The objective of this study was to assess which SBT best reproduces inspiratory effort after extubation in five critical illnesses.
In this multicentre randomized cross-over study, adult intensive care unit patients under invasive mechanical ventilation for at least 24-h and ready for extubation, underwent three 15-min SBTs in random order: pressure support ventilation level of 7-cmH2O with positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) level of 0-cmH2O (PSV7PEEP0), PSV 0-cmH2O with PEEP 0-cmH2O (PSV0PEEP0) and T-piece trial. Primary outcome was the variation of pressure–time-product per minute (PTPmin) between each SBT and 20-min after extubation. Five categories of critical illnesses were selected: abdominal surgery, brain injury, chest trauma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and miscellaneous.
Five hundred measures of effort from 100 patients were analysed. PTPmin (cmH2O s/min, median and interquartile range, IQR) was 256 (208–321) after extubation, 192 (127–281) at the end of PSV7PEEP0 (p < 0.001 in comparison to after extubation), 291 (235–347) at the end of PSV0PEEP0 and 262 (198–338) at the end of T-piece (both no different from after extubation). One method of SBT in patients with brain injury (PSV0PEEP0), two in abdominal surgery (PSV0PEEP0 and T-piece) and miscellaneous patients (PSV7PEEP0 and T-piece) and all three methods in chest trauma and COPD exacerbation patients replicated reasonably accurately the postextubation effort to breathe.
Unassisted SBTs, namely PSV0PEEP0 and T-piece trial, are the most appropriate to replicate the postextubation effort to breathe.
Low-value care is common in intensive care units (ICUs), unnecessarily exposing patients to risks and harms, incuring costs to the patient and healthcare system, and contributing to healthcare’s carbon footprint. We aimed to identify, collate, and summarise published evidence on the impact of interventions to reduce low-value care in ICUs.
We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL from inception to 22 September 2023 for evaluations of interventions aiming to reduce low-value care, supplemented by reference lists and recently published articles. We recorded impacts on the low-value target, health outcomes, resource use, cost, and the environment.
From 1155 studies screened, 32 eligible studies were identified evaluating interventions to reduce: routine blood testing (n = 13), routine chest X-rays (n = 10), and other types (or multiple types) of low-value care (n = 9). All but 3 of the interventions found reductions in the immediate low-value care target (usually the primary outcome). Although the small sample size of most included studies, limited their ability to detect impacts on other outcomes, many interventions were also associated with improved health outcomes and financial savings. The only study that reported environmental impacts found the intervention was associated with reduced carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2-e) emissions.
Interventions to reduce low-value care in ICUs may have important health, financial, and environmental co-benefits. Further research may inform wider scale-up and sustainability of successful strategies to decrease low-value healthcare. More empirical evidence on potential environmental benefits may inform policies to lower healthcare’s carbon footprint.