Pub Date : 2025-02-28DOI: 10.1097/YIC.0000000000000585
Dimy Fluyau, Vasanth Kattalai Kailasam, Paul Kim, Neelambika Revadigar
The benefit of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in improving quality of life (QoL) has been investigated in randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) with equivocal results. This study explored whether SSRIs could improve QoL in individuals with medical, psychiatric, and neuropsychiatric conditions. RCTs were searched in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Ovid, and Google Scholar. Data were synthesized via a meta-analysis. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses were performed. The sample size was 9,070. Compared with placebo, SSRIs showed statistically significant improvements in QoL in cancer (d = 0.30), major depressive disorder (d = 0.27), premenstrual dysphoric disorder (d = 0.38), type 2 diabetes mellitus (d = 0.48), persistent depressive disorder (d = 0.32), and menopausal symptoms (d = 0.40). Paroxetine exhibited the highest effect size. No significant improvements were noted in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (d = 0.65, P = 0.09), congestive heart failure (d = 0.46, P = 0.27), and irritable bowel syndrome (d = 0.26, P = 0.127). The reduction in depressive symptoms improved QoL. Small-study effects, high attrition rates, and demographic imbalances are limiting factors to recommend SSRIs to improve QoL. Future research should focus on QoL domains and pharmacological properties of each SSRI.
{"title":"Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and quality of life: a meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials.","authors":"Dimy Fluyau, Vasanth Kattalai Kailasam, Paul Kim, Neelambika Revadigar","doi":"10.1097/YIC.0000000000000585","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/YIC.0000000000000585","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The benefit of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in improving quality of life (QoL) has been investigated in randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) with equivocal results. This study explored whether SSRIs could improve QoL in individuals with medical, psychiatric, and neuropsychiatric conditions. RCTs were searched in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Ovid, and Google Scholar. Data were synthesized via a meta-analysis. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses were performed. The sample size was 9,070. Compared with placebo, SSRIs showed statistically significant improvements in QoL in cancer (d = 0.30), major depressive disorder (d = 0.27), premenstrual dysphoric disorder (d = 0.38), type 2 diabetes mellitus (d = 0.48), persistent depressive disorder (d = 0.32), and menopausal symptoms (d = 0.40). Paroxetine exhibited the highest effect size. No significant improvements were noted in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (d = 0.65, P = 0.09), congestive heart failure (d = 0.46, P = 0.27), and irritable bowel syndrome (d = 0.26, P = 0.127). The reduction in depressive symptoms improved QoL. Small-study effects, high attrition rates, and demographic imbalances are limiting factors to recommend SSRIs to improve QoL. Future research should focus on QoL domains and pharmacological properties of each SSRI.</p>","PeriodicalId":13698,"journal":{"name":"International Clinical Psychopharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143515608","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-19DOI: 10.1097/YIC.0000000000000584
Margherita Barbuti, Martina Moriconi, Daria Bartolini, Ugo De Rosa, Camilla Elefante, Elisa Schiavi, Giulio Perugi
The aim of this study is to evaluate the therapeutic outcomes, tolerability, and adherence to immediate-release (IR) and prolonged-release (PR) lithium formulations in patients with bipolar disorder (BD) over a 2-year follow-up. This naturalistic study included 143 BD patients who initiated IR (48%) or PR (52%) lithium treatment at the inpatient and outpatient services of the University Hospital of Pisa. During follow-up, data were collected on side effects, treatment adherence, blood lithium levels, and creatinine and thyroid stimulating hormone concentrations. Clinical efficacy and functioning were assessed using the Clinical Global Impressions for Bipolar Disorder and Functioning Assessment Short Test scales. Approximately 50% of patients completed the 2-year follow-up, with similar dropout rates between the two groups. Both groups showed significant clinical improvement with comparable efficacy. PR lithium, however, was associated with fewer side effects, particularly tremors and gastrointestinal issues, leading to better adherence. Additionally, PR lithium administration resulted in more stable blood lithium levels. Despite its limitations, including the observational design, potential confounders such as concomitant medications, and a high dropout rate, these findings suggest that PR lithium formulations provide similar clinical efficacy to IR formulations but offer superior tolerability. Therefore, PR lithium represents a favorable option for improving adherence, particularly in patients at risk of treatment discontinuation.
{"title":"Immediate-release vs. prolonged-release lithium formulations in bipolar disorder: a 2-year comparative study.","authors":"Margherita Barbuti, Martina Moriconi, Daria Bartolini, Ugo De Rosa, Camilla Elefante, Elisa Schiavi, Giulio Perugi","doi":"10.1097/YIC.0000000000000584","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/YIC.0000000000000584","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study is to evaluate the therapeutic outcomes, tolerability, and adherence to immediate-release (IR) and prolonged-release (PR) lithium formulations in patients with bipolar disorder (BD) over a 2-year follow-up. This naturalistic study included 143 BD patients who initiated IR (48%) or PR (52%) lithium treatment at the inpatient and outpatient services of the University Hospital of Pisa. During follow-up, data were collected on side effects, treatment adherence, blood lithium levels, and creatinine and thyroid stimulating hormone concentrations. Clinical efficacy and functioning were assessed using the Clinical Global Impressions for Bipolar Disorder and Functioning Assessment Short Test scales. Approximately 50% of patients completed the 2-year follow-up, with similar dropout rates between the two groups. Both groups showed significant clinical improvement with comparable efficacy. PR lithium, however, was associated with fewer side effects, particularly tremors and gastrointestinal issues, leading to better adherence. Additionally, PR lithium administration resulted in more stable blood lithium levels. Despite its limitations, including the observational design, potential confounders such as concomitant medications, and a high dropout rate, these findings suggest that PR lithium formulations provide similar clinical efficacy to IR formulations but offer superior tolerability. Therefore, PR lithium represents a favorable option for improving adherence, particularly in patients at risk of treatment discontinuation.</p>","PeriodicalId":13698,"journal":{"name":"International Clinical Psychopharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143448997","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a chronic illness associated with significant functional impairment. Monotherapy with serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SRIs) often leads to only partial improvement of symptoms. In such cases, a common, well established, treatment approach for most patients is the augmentation of SRI therapy with antipsychotic medications. Brexpiprazole is an atypical antipsychotic agent that acts as a partial agonist of 5-HT1A, D2, and D3 receptors. Purpose of this retrospective observational study was to evaluate the effectiveness and tolerability of brexpiprazole as augmentation to SRIs in patients with treatment-resistant OCD. This preliminary study included a sample of 10 patients diagnosed with treatment-resistant OCD who underwent a 12-week trial of augmentative brexpiprazole, starting at a dose of 1 mg/day, with dosage adjustments based on clinical judgment. Treatment response was assessed through changes in the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) total score from baseline to the end of the 12-week observation period. Adverse events were systematically recorded. Significant improvement was observed after the 12-week period: at the endpoint, seven patients (70%) achieved a ≥25% reduction in Y-BOCS total score compared to baseline, with five of them (50% of the overall sample) showing a more robust clinical response (≥35% reduction). Mild adverse effects, such as sedation and weight gain, were reported by two participants (20% of the overall sample). These findings suggest that brexpiprazole may offer a promising effectiveness and tolerability profile in the management of treatment-resistant OCD.
{"title":"Brexpiprazole augmentation in treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder: a preliminary retrospective observational study.","authors":"Luca Giacovelli, Eleonora Piccoli, Paola Landi, Matteo Vismara, Beatrice Benatti, Bernardo Dell'Osso","doi":"10.1097/YIC.0000000000000583","DOIUrl":"10.1097/YIC.0000000000000583","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a chronic illness associated with significant functional impairment. Monotherapy with serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SRIs) often leads to only partial improvement of symptoms. In such cases, a common, well established, treatment approach for most patients is the augmentation of SRI therapy with antipsychotic medications. Brexpiprazole is an atypical antipsychotic agent that acts as a partial agonist of 5-HT1A, D2, and D3 receptors. Purpose of this retrospective observational study was to evaluate the effectiveness and tolerability of brexpiprazole as augmentation to SRIs in patients with treatment-resistant OCD. This preliminary study included a sample of 10 patients diagnosed with treatment-resistant OCD who underwent a 12-week trial of augmentative brexpiprazole, starting at a dose of 1 mg/day, with dosage adjustments based on clinical judgment. Treatment response was assessed through changes in the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) total score from baseline to the end of the 12-week observation period. Adverse events were systematically recorded. Significant improvement was observed after the 12-week period: at the endpoint, seven patients (70%) achieved a ≥25% reduction in Y-BOCS total score compared to baseline, with five of them (50% of the overall sample) showing a more robust clinical response (≥35% reduction). Mild adverse effects, such as sedation and weight gain, were reported by two participants (20% of the overall sample). These findings suggest that brexpiprazole may offer a promising effectiveness and tolerability profile in the management of treatment-resistant OCD.</p>","PeriodicalId":13698,"journal":{"name":"International Clinical Psychopharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143255480","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-22DOI: 10.1097/YIC.0000000000000578
Andrea Fagiolini, Alessandro Cuomo, Domenico De Berardis, Bernardo Dell'Osso, Maurizio Pompili, Gianluca Serafini
Schizophrenia is a serious psychiatric condition requiring continuous treatment with antipsychotic medications available in different formulations, including oral antipsychotics (OAPs) and long-acting injectables (LAIs). This narrative review aims to comprehensively outline the advantages and disadvantages of OAPs and LAIs to support clinicians in choosing different formulations based on the presentation of clinical symptoms. An electronic search of the PubMed database was performed in June 2024, and additional articles were retrieved from the references or personal knowledge of the authors. Relevant advantages of OAPs identified in the literature include dosing flexibility, ease of discontinuation, lower cost, autonomy of patient administration, shorter time to steady-state, and wide choice of molecules, including risk of nonadherence, plasma level fluctuations, food and drug interactions, and polypharmacy. LAIs' advantages include improved adherence leading to reduced relapse rates and hospitalizations, patient convenience, and stable drug levels while disadvantages include discomfort of injection, possible stigma, less manageable drug interactions, organization of administration centers, and patient preference possibly contrary to physician preference. When treating schizophrenia, it is critical to consider patients' needs, preferences, and history of medication adherence. Combining patient education with individualized treatment plans may optimize outcomes and improve the quality of life.
{"title":"Differentiating aspects of oral and long-acting injectable antipsychotic drugs for tailoring the therapy of schizophrenia in clinical practice: a narrative review.","authors":"Andrea Fagiolini, Alessandro Cuomo, Domenico De Berardis, Bernardo Dell'Osso, Maurizio Pompili, Gianluca Serafini","doi":"10.1097/YIC.0000000000000578","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/YIC.0000000000000578","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Schizophrenia is a serious psychiatric condition requiring continuous treatment with antipsychotic medications available in different formulations, including oral antipsychotics (OAPs) and long-acting injectables (LAIs). This narrative review aims to comprehensively outline the advantages and disadvantages of OAPs and LAIs to support clinicians in choosing different formulations based on the presentation of clinical symptoms. An electronic search of the PubMed database was performed in June 2024, and additional articles were retrieved from the references or personal knowledge of the authors. Relevant advantages of OAPs identified in the literature include dosing flexibility, ease of discontinuation, lower cost, autonomy of patient administration, shorter time to steady-state, and wide choice of molecules, including risk of nonadherence, plasma level fluctuations, food and drug interactions, and polypharmacy. LAIs' advantages include improved adherence leading to reduced relapse rates and hospitalizations, patient convenience, and stable drug levels while disadvantages include discomfort of injection, possible stigma, less manageable drug interactions, organization of administration centers, and patient preference possibly contrary to physician preference. When treating schizophrenia, it is critical to consider patients' needs, preferences, and history of medication adherence. Combining patient education with individualized treatment plans may optimize outcomes and improve the quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":13698,"journal":{"name":"International Clinical Psychopharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143004952","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-13DOI: 10.1097/YIC.0000000000000580
Pietro Carmellini, Alessandro Cuomo, Caterina Pierini, Simone Pardossi, Mario Pinzi, Elisa Mariantoni, Andrea Fagiolini
Psychomotor agitation is a challenging symptom of major depressive disorder with mixed features (MDD-MF), often worsening outcomes and complicating treatment. This retrospective study assessed the efficacy and tolerability of intravenous trazodone in 97 hospitalized patients with MDE-MF. Symptom severity was evaluated using montgomery asberg depression rating Scale (MADRS), young mania rating scale, hamilton anxiety rating scale, GAD-7, and clinical global impression scale-severity of illness (CGI-S) scales, with significant reductions in agitation, anxiety, and irritability observed early during treatment. Correlation analyses revealed significant negative associations between intravenous (IV) trazodone dosage and improvements in MADRS (r = -0.23; P < 0.05), item 5 of GAD-7 (r = -0.27; P < 0.001), and CGI-S scores (r = -0.22; P < 0.05). Therapy duration also correlated negatively with improvements in GAD-7 item 5 (r = -0.29; P < 0.001) and CGI-S (r = -0.27; P < 0.001), indicating diminishing returns with prolonged treatment. Regression analyses showed that therapy duration, but not dosage, significantly influenced improvements in GAD-7 item 5 and CGI-S. Trazodone was well-tolerated, with only mild side effects in 11.3% of patients. These findings suggest that IV trazodone effectively reduces agitation and related symptoms in MDD-MF, particularly in the early treatment phase, emphasizing the importance of optimizing treatment duration. Future studies should investigate individualized dosing strategies and explore long-term outcomes in this population.
{"title":"Intravenous trazodone for the treatment of psychomotor agitation and associated symptoms in major depressive disorder patients experiencing a depressive episode with mixed features.","authors":"Pietro Carmellini, Alessandro Cuomo, Caterina Pierini, Simone Pardossi, Mario Pinzi, Elisa Mariantoni, Andrea Fagiolini","doi":"10.1097/YIC.0000000000000580","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/YIC.0000000000000580","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Psychomotor agitation is a challenging symptom of major depressive disorder with mixed features (MDD-MF), often worsening outcomes and complicating treatment. This retrospective study assessed the efficacy and tolerability of intravenous trazodone in 97 hospitalized patients with MDE-MF. Symptom severity was evaluated using montgomery asberg depression rating Scale (MADRS), young mania rating scale, hamilton anxiety rating scale, GAD-7, and clinical global impression scale-severity of illness (CGI-S) scales, with significant reductions in agitation, anxiety, and irritability observed early during treatment. Correlation analyses revealed significant negative associations between intravenous (IV) trazodone dosage and improvements in MADRS (r = -0.23; P < 0.05), item 5 of GAD-7 (r = -0.27; P < 0.001), and CGI-S scores (r = -0.22; P < 0.05). Therapy duration also correlated negatively with improvements in GAD-7 item 5 (r = -0.29; P < 0.001) and CGI-S (r = -0.27; P < 0.001), indicating diminishing returns with prolonged treatment. Regression analyses showed that therapy duration, but not dosage, significantly influenced improvements in GAD-7 item 5 and CGI-S. Trazodone was well-tolerated, with only mild side effects in 11.3% of patients. These findings suggest that IV trazodone effectively reduces agitation and related symptoms in MDD-MF, particularly in the early treatment phase, emphasizing the importance of optimizing treatment duration. Future studies should investigate individualized dosing strategies and explore long-term outcomes in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":13698,"journal":{"name":"International Clinical Psychopharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143004954","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-09DOI: 10.1097/YIC.0000000000000577
Siegfried Kasper, Raffaele Antonelli Incalzi, Marco Bozzali, Pedro Morgado, Marcin Siwek
This study aims to elucidate current trends in clinical practice for managing depression in elderly patients, focusing on the utilization of pharmacotherapeutics and integrated care models to improve patient outcomes. A comprehensive survey was conducted among physicians from various European countries to gather insights into prescribing habits, treatment patterns, and the impact of comorbidities on therapeutic choices, with a focus on trazodone. The participants included psychiatrists, general practitioners, and neurologists actively involved in elderly depression care. The findings reveal a preference among physicians for using antidepressants like trazodone, due to efficacy and tolerability. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors were also commonly prescribed, while tricyclic antidepressants and monoamine oxidase inhibitors were less favored. Psychiatric conditions and sleep disturbances significantly influenced treatment decisions. The survey underscored the importance of multidisciplinary management and the crucial role of caregivers in the treatment process. Effective management of depression in the elderly demands a precision approach that incorporates a thorough understanding of pharmacology, comorbidities, and a collaborative approach to maximize the effects of treatment while trying to minimize polypharmacy and the co-occurring side effects. The study highlights the need for tailored treatment strategies that address the complex needs of the elderly to enhance their quality of life and treatment outcomes.
{"title":"Managing depression in the elderly: real-world clinical considerations and perspectives.","authors":"Siegfried Kasper, Raffaele Antonelli Incalzi, Marco Bozzali, Pedro Morgado, Marcin Siwek","doi":"10.1097/YIC.0000000000000577","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/YIC.0000000000000577","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aims to elucidate current trends in clinical practice for managing depression in elderly patients, focusing on the utilization of pharmacotherapeutics and integrated care models to improve patient outcomes. A comprehensive survey was conducted among physicians from various European countries to gather insights into prescribing habits, treatment patterns, and the impact of comorbidities on therapeutic choices, with a focus on trazodone. The participants included psychiatrists, general practitioners, and neurologists actively involved in elderly depression care. The findings reveal a preference among physicians for using antidepressants like trazodone, due to efficacy and tolerability. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors were also commonly prescribed, while tricyclic antidepressants and monoamine oxidase inhibitors were less favored. Psychiatric conditions and sleep disturbances significantly influenced treatment decisions. The survey underscored the importance of multidisciplinary management and the crucial role of caregivers in the treatment process. Effective management of depression in the elderly demands a precision approach that incorporates a thorough understanding of pharmacology, comorbidities, and a collaborative approach to maximize the effects of treatment while trying to minimize polypharmacy and the co-occurring side effects. The study highlights the need for tailored treatment strategies that address the complex needs of the elderly to enhance their quality of life and treatment outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":13698,"journal":{"name":"International Clinical Psychopharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142970559","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a prevalent sleep disorder linked to significant daytime sleepiness and mood disturbances. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy is the standard treatment for OSA, but its effects on mental health outcomes, are not well understood. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of CPAP on daytime sleepiness, depressive symptoms, and anxiety symptoms while assessing how improvements vary with age. A total of 98 participants diagnosed with OSA were included in this study. Pretreatment and posttreatment scores for daytime sleepiness [Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS)], depression [Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)], and anxiety [Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD)] were collected. Improvements were calculated as the difference between pretreatment and posttreatment scores. Age, sex, ethnicity, apnea-hypopnea index, and CPAP compliance, were analyzed. Significant improvements were observed across all age groups after CPAP treatment: ESS scores improved by a mean of 5.6 points (P < 0.001), PHQ scores improved by 6.3 points (P < 0.001), and GAD scores improved by 1.1 points (P = 0.002). CPAP therapy effectively reduced daytime sleepiness, depression, and anxiety in patients with OSA, with significant age-related differences in outcomes. Younger individuals benefited most from treatment.
{"title":"Age matters when improving symptoms of anxiety, depression, and sleepiness in patients with obstructive sleep apnea treated with continuous positive airway pressure.","authors":"Amitoj Singh, Sanket Meghpara, Rijesh Niraula, Lynn Keenan, Lourdes M DelRosso","doi":"10.1097/YIC.0000000000000579","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/YIC.0000000000000579","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a prevalent sleep disorder linked to significant daytime sleepiness and mood disturbances. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy is the standard treatment for OSA, but its effects on mental health outcomes, are not well understood. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of CPAP on daytime sleepiness, depressive symptoms, and anxiety symptoms while assessing how improvements vary with age. A total of 98 participants diagnosed with OSA were included in this study. Pretreatment and posttreatment scores for daytime sleepiness [Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS)], depression [Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)], and anxiety [Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD)] were collected. Improvements were calculated as the difference between pretreatment and posttreatment scores. Age, sex, ethnicity, apnea-hypopnea index, and CPAP compliance, were analyzed. Significant improvements were observed across all age groups after CPAP treatment: ESS scores improved by a mean of 5.6 points (P < 0.001), PHQ scores improved by 6.3 points (P < 0.001), and GAD scores improved by 1.1 points (P = 0.002). CPAP therapy effectively reduced daytime sleepiness, depression, and anxiety in patients with OSA, with significant age-related differences in outcomes. Younger individuals benefited most from treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":13698,"journal":{"name":"International Clinical Psychopharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142948370","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2024-02-06DOI: 10.1097/YIC.0000000000000533
Gianluca Borgiani, Chiara Possidente, Chiara Fabbri, Vincenzo Oliva, Mirjam Bloemendaal, Alejandro Arias Vasquez, Ted G Dinan, Eduard Vieta, Marco Menchetti, Diana De Ronchi, Alessandro Serretti, Giuseppe Fanelli
This review synthesizes the evidence on associations between antidepressant use and gut microbiota composition and function, exploring the microbiota's possible role in modulating antidepressant treatment outcomes. Antidepressants exert an influence on measures of gut microbial diversity. The most consistently reported differences were in β-diversity between those exposed to antidepressants and those not exposed, with longitudinal studies supporting a potential causal association. Compositional alterations in antidepressant users include an increase in the Bacteroidetes phylum, Christensenellaceae family, and Bacteroides and Clostridium genera, while a decrease was found in the Firmicutes phylum, Ruminococcaceae family, and Ruminococcus genus. In addition, antidepressants attenuate gut microbial differences between depressed and healthy individuals, modulate microbial serotonin transport, and influence microbiota's metabolic functions. These include lyxose degradation, peptidoglycan maturation, membrane transport, and methylerythritol phosphate pathways, alongside gamma-aminobutyric acid metabolism. Importantly, baseline increased α-diversity and abundance of the Roseburia and Faecalibacterium genera, in the Firmicutes phylum, are associated with antidepressant response, emerging as promising biomarkers. This review highlights the potential for gut microbiota as a predictor of treatment response and emphasizes the need for further research to elucidate the mechanisms underlying antidepressant-microbiota interactions. More homogeneous studies and standardized techniques are required to confirm these initial findings.
{"title":"The bidirectional interaction between antidepressants and the gut microbiota: are there implications for treatment response?","authors":"Gianluca Borgiani, Chiara Possidente, Chiara Fabbri, Vincenzo Oliva, Mirjam Bloemendaal, Alejandro Arias Vasquez, Ted G Dinan, Eduard Vieta, Marco Menchetti, Diana De Ronchi, Alessandro Serretti, Giuseppe Fanelli","doi":"10.1097/YIC.0000000000000533","DOIUrl":"10.1097/YIC.0000000000000533","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This review synthesizes the evidence on associations between antidepressant use and gut microbiota composition and function, exploring the microbiota's possible role in modulating antidepressant treatment outcomes. Antidepressants exert an influence on measures of gut microbial diversity. The most consistently reported differences were in β-diversity between those exposed to antidepressants and those not exposed, with longitudinal studies supporting a potential causal association. Compositional alterations in antidepressant users include an increase in the Bacteroidetes phylum, Christensenellaceae family, and Bacteroides and Clostridium genera, while a decrease was found in the Firmicutes phylum, Ruminococcaceae family, and Ruminococcus genus. In addition, antidepressants attenuate gut microbial differences between depressed and healthy individuals, modulate microbial serotonin transport, and influence microbiota's metabolic functions. These include lyxose degradation, peptidoglycan maturation, membrane transport, and methylerythritol phosphate pathways, alongside gamma-aminobutyric acid metabolism. Importantly, baseline increased α-diversity and abundance of the Roseburia and Faecalibacterium genera, in the Firmicutes phylum, are associated with antidepressant response, emerging as promising biomarkers. This review highlights the potential for gut microbiota as a predictor of treatment response and emphasizes the need for further research to elucidate the mechanisms underlying antidepressant-microbiota interactions. More homogeneous studies and standardized techniques are required to confirm these initial findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":13698,"journal":{"name":"International Clinical Psychopharmacology","volume":"40 1","pages":"3-26"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11594561/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142768517","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2024-11-27DOI: 10.1097/YIC.0000000000000507
Paula Jhoana Escobedo-Aedo, Irene Pans, Enrique Baca-García, Jose de Leon, María-Luisa Barrigón, Santiago Ovejero
{"title":"Dropped-Head syndrome: a possible new variant of clozapine-induced inflammation during titration.","authors":"Paula Jhoana Escobedo-Aedo, Irene Pans, Enrique Baca-García, Jose de Leon, María-Luisa Barrigón, Santiago Ovejero","doi":"10.1097/YIC.0000000000000507","DOIUrl":"10.1097/YIC.0000000000000507","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":13698,"journal":{"name":"International Clinical Psychopharmacology","volume":"40 1","pages":"41-45"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142750833","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}