Postpartum depression (PPD) is an increasingly prevalent but still poorly characterized disorder. Causal and modulating factors include hormones fluctuations, such as estrogen, progesterone, and allopregnolone, pathways imbalances, such as oxytocin and kynurenine, chronobiological factors, and brain imaging alterations. Treatment may differ from the traditional major depression management, while selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors such as sertraline are commonly used and suggested by guidelines, neurosteroids such as brexanolone and the more convenient zuranolone have been recently approved. Newer neurosteroids such as ganaxolone, valaxanolone, and lysaxanolone are currently under development, but also esketamine and psychedelics are promising potential treatments. Other somatic treatments including brain stimulation techniques and light therapy also showed benefit. PPD is therefore increasingly understood as, at least partially, independent from major depressive disorder. Specific and individualized treatments including pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapies are progressively being introduced in the routine clinical practice.
{"title":"Understanding and treating postpartum depression: a narrative review.","authors":"Vincenzo Cardaci, Matteo Carminati, Mattia Tondello, Basilio Pecorino, Alessandro Serretti, Raffaella Zanardi","doi":"10.1097/YIC.0000000000000560","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/YIC.0000000000000560","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Postpartum depression (PPD) is an increasingly prevalent but still poorly characterized disorder. Causal and modulating factors include hormones fluctuations, such as estrogen, progesterone, and allopregnolone, pathways imbalances, such as oxytocin and kynurenine, chronobiological factors, and brain imaging alterations. Treatment may differ from the traditional major depression management, while selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors such as sertraline are commonly used and suggested by guidelines, neurosteroids such as brexanolone and the more convenient zuranolone have been recently approved. Newer neurosteroids such as ganaxolone, valaxanolone, and lysaxanolone are currently under development, but also esketamine and psychedelics are promising potential treatments. Other somatic treatments including brain stimulation techniques and light therapy also showed benefit. PPD is therefore increasingly understood as, at least partially, independent from major depressive disorder. Specific and individualized treatments including pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapies are progressively being introduced in the routine clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":13698,"journal":{"name":"International Clinical Psychopharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141467739","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-14DOI: 10.1097/YIC.0000000000000559
Valerio Ricci, Alessandro Sarni, Giovanni Martinotti, Giuseppe Maina
Background and objectives: Schizophrenia is a chronic, complex mental health disorder requiring effective management to mitigate its broad personal and societal impacts. This narrative review assesses the efficacy, effectiveness, and side effects of third-generation antipsychotics (TGAs) like aripiprazole, brexpiprazole, and cariprazine, focusing on their use in first-episode schizophrenia. These drugs aim to reduce side effects typical of earlier antipsychotics while more effectively addressing positive and cognitive symptoms.
Methods: Our extensive literature review, using PubMed and Scopus, includes randomized controlled trials and observational studies, showing TGAs may match older antipsychotics in efficacy with fewer side effects, notably in reducing extrapyramidal symptoms and enhancing cognitive outcomes.
Results: Aripiprazole appears effective in both acute and maintenance phases of schizophrenia, while brexpiprazole and cariprazine show potential in managing negative symptoms and improving social functioning, essential for patient recovery.
Conclusions: This review emphasizes the need for personalized treatment and further research to fully determine the long-term benefits and safety of TGAs. These findings can inform clinical decisions and underline the ongoing need for innovation in schizophrenia pharmacotherapy.
{"title":"Comparative analysis of third-generation antipsychotics in first-episode schizophrenia: efficacy, safety, and cognitive impacts. A narrative review.","authors":"Valerio Ricci, Alessandro Sarni, Giovanni Martinotti, Giuseppe Maina","doi":"10.1097/YIC.0000000000000559","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/YIC.0000000000000559","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Schizophrenia is a chronic, complex mental health disorder requiring effective management to mitigate its broad personal and societal impacts. This narrative review assesses the efficacy, effectiveness, and side effects of third-generation antipsychotics (TGAs) like aripiprazole, brexpiprazole, and cariprazine, focusing on their use in first-episode schizophrenia. These drugs aim to reduce side effects typical of earlier antipsychotics while more effectively addressing positive and cognitive symptoms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our extensive literature review, using PubMed and Scopus, includes randomized controlled trials and observational studies, showing TGAs may match older antipsychotics in efficacy with fewer side effects, notably in reducing extrapyramidal symptoms and enhancing cognitive outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Aripiprazole appears effective in both acute and maintenance phases of schizophrenia, while brexpiprazole and cariprazine show potential in managing negative symptoms and improving social functioning, essential for patient recovery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review emphasizes the need for personalized treatment and further research to fully determine the long-term benefits and safety of TGAs. These findings can inform clinical decisions and underline the ongoing need for innovation in schizophrenia pharmacotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":13698,"journal":{"name":"International Clinical Psychopharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141467738","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-14DOI: 10.1097/YIC.0000000000000554
Clotilde Guidetti, Anna Feeney, Rebecca S Hock, Nadia Iovieno, Jesús M Hernández Ortiz, Maurizio Fava, George I Papakostas
Currently, there are few pharmacotherapy options for clinicians treating post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and antidepressants are usually the medication of choice. This meta-analysis aimed to review the efficacy of antidepressants in the acute treatment of PTSD in adults while investigating the contribution of study design and placebo response to the findings of these studies. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials that compared antidepressants with placebo for acute treatment of PTSD were selected. Standardized mean difference (SMD) in change in Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale scores were pooled after examining for heterogeneity. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed. Twenty-nine antidepressant-placebo comparisons, involving 4575 subjects, were analyzed. The SMD among all studies was 0.25, a small to medium effect size, lower than that in studies of antidepressants in adult major depressive disorder. The SMDs for low and high mean placebo responses, were 0.27 and 0.22, respectively. The overall SMD for paroxetine studies was in the moderate range (0.43) and that for sertraline studies was in the small range (0.12). Our findings suggest that antidepressants have modest efficacy in alleviating PTSD symptoms. Patient-level meta-analyses are required to further explore the potential clinical relevance of sertraline for PTSD.
{"title":"Antidepressants in the acute treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Clotilde Guidetti, Anna Feeney, Rebecca S Hock, Nadia Iovieno, Jesús M Hernández Ortiz, Maurizio Fava, George I Papakostas","doi":"10.1097/YIC.0000000000000554","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/YIC.0000000000000554","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Currently, there are few pharmacotherapy options for clinicians treating post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and antidepressants are usually the medication of choice. This meta-analysis aimed to review the efficacy of antidepressants in the acute treatment of PTSD in adults while investigating the contribution of study design and placebo response to the findings of these studies. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials that compared antidepressants with placebo for acute treatment of PTSD were selected. Standardized mean difference (SMD) in change in Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale scores were pooled after examining for heterogeneity. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed. Twenty-nine antidepressant-placebo comparisons, involving 4575 subjects, were analyzed. The SMD among all studies was 0.25, a small to medium effect size, lower than that in studies of antidepressants in adult major depressive disorder. The SMDs for low and high mean placebo responses, were 0.27 and 0.22, respectively. The overall SMD for paroxetine studies was in the moderate range (0.43) and that for sertraline studies was in the small range (0.12). Our findings suggest that antidepressants have modest efficacy in alleviating PTSD symptoms. Patient-level meta-analyses are required to further explore the potential clinical relevance of sertraline for PTSD.</p>","PeriodicalId":13698,"journal":{"name":"International Clinical Psychopharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141317243","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-05-30DOI: 10.1097/YIC.0000000000000557
Nicolaja Girone, Maddalena Cocchi, Francesco Achilli, Edoardo Grechi, Chiara Vicentini, Beatrice Benatti, Matteo Vismara, Alberto Priori, Bernardo Dell'Osso
Approximately 50% of patients with psychiatric disorders do not fully adhere to the prescribed psychopharmacological therapy, significantly impacting the progression of the disorder and the patient's quality of life. The present study aimed to assess potential differences in terms of rates and clinical features of treatment adherence in a large cohort of psychiatric patients with different diagnoses attending various psychiatric services. The study included 307 psychiatric patients diagnosed with a primary major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, schizophrenic spectrum disorder, or personality disorder. Patient's adherence to treatment was evaluated using the Clinician Rating Scale, with a cutoff of at least five defining adherence subgroups. One-third of the sample reported poor medication adherence. A lower rate of adherence emerged among patients with schizophrenic spectrum disorder and bipolar disorder. Subjects with poor adherence were more frequently inpatients and showed higher current substance use, a greater number of previous hospitalizations, and more severe scores at psychopathological assessment compared with patients with positive adherence. Poor adherence was associated with symptom severity and increased rates of relapses and rehospitalizations. In addition, substance use appears to be an unfavorable transdiagnostic factor for treatment adherence.
{"title":"Treatment adherence rates across different psychiatric disorders and settings: findings from a large patient cohort.","authors":"Nicolaja Girone, Maddalena Cocchi, Francesco Achilli, Edoardo Grechi, Chiara Vicentini, Beatrice Benatti, Matteo Vismara, Alberto Priori, Bernardo Dell'Osso","doi":"10.1097/YIC.0000000000000557","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/YIC.0000000000000557","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Approximately 50% of patients with psychiatric disorders do not fully adhere to the prescribed psychopharmacological therapy, significantly impacting the progression of the disorder and the patient's quality of life. The present study aimed to assess potential differences in terms of rates and clinical features of treatment adherence in a large cohort of psychiatric patients with different diagnoses attending various psychiatric services. The study included 307 psychiatric patients diagnosed with a primary major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, schizophrenic spectrum disorder, or personality disorder. Patient's adherence to treatment was evaluated using the Clinician Rating Scale, with a cutoff of at least five defining adherence subgroups. One-third of the sample reported poor medication adherence. A lower rate of adherence emerged among patients with schizophrenic spectrum disorder and bipolar disorder. Subjects with poor adherence were more frequently inpatients and showed higher current substance use, a greater number of previous hospitalizations, and more severe scores at psychopathological assessment compared with patients with positive adherence. Poor adherence was associated with symptom severity and increased rates of relapses and rehospitalizations. In addition, substance use appears to be an unfavorable transdiagnostic factor for treatment adherence.</p>","PeriodicalId":13698,"journal":{"name":"International Clinical Psychopharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141175639","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-05-20DOI: 10.1097/YIC.0000000000000551
Sean D Hood, Olatunji Odufowora-Sita, Jean-Baptiste Briere, Marco Lucchino, Fatma Khrouf, Elzbieta Olewinska, Paulina Pierzchala, Marwa Mezghani, Mateusz Nikodem, Pierre Lévy
This systematic literature review aimed to assess the efficacy and tolerability of agomelatine versus approved medications for the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) in adult patients. We selected randomized controlled trials on various medications used to treat GAD in adult patients. An existing systematic literature review (Kong et al., 2020) was used to identify relevant studies published before 2020. Outcomes of remission and discontinuation due to adverse events (AEs) were analyzed, following a random-effects network meta-analysis approach. Of 25 identified studies, 20 and 22 studies were included in the network meta-analysis for studying the remission and discontinuation (due to AEs) outcomes, respectively. A statistically significant difference in the remission rate was observed between agomelatine and pregabalin [odds ratio (OR), 2.22; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.19-4.21]. For the other comparators, the results were nonsignificant; however, all the point estimates were in favor of agomelatine. Similarly, for discontinuation because of AEs, the point estimates leaned consistently toward agomelatine suggesting its higher tolerability. The probabilities of agomelatine having the highest remission rate and lowest discontinuation (due to AEs) rate were 67% and 68%, respectively. Based on its demonstrated effectiveness and tolerability, agomelatine can be considered as a drug of choice for the treatment of GAD.
{"title":"Systematic review and network meta-analysis of agomelatine for the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder in adult patients.","authors":"Sean D Hood, Olatunji Odufowora-Sita, Jean-Baptiste Briere, Marco Lucchino, Fatma Khrouf, Elzbieta Olewinska, Paulina Pierzchala, Marwa Mezghani, Mateusz Nikodem, Pierre Lévy","doi":"10.1097/YIC.0000000000000551","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/YIC.0000000000000551","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This systematic literature review aimed to assess the efficacy and tolerability of agomelatine versus approved medications for the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) in adult patients. We selected randomized controlled trials on various medications used to treat GAD in adult patients. An existing systematic literature review (Kong et al., 2020) was used to identify relevant studies published before 2020. Outcomes of remission and discontinuation due to adverse events (AEs) were analyzed, following a random-effects network meta-analysis approach. Of 25 identified studies, 20 and 22 studies were included in the network meta-analysis for studying the remission and discontinuation (due to AEs) outcomes, respectively. A statistically significant difference in the remission rate was observed between agomelatine and pregabalin [odds ratio (OR), 2.22; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.19-4.21]. For the other comparators, the results were nonsignificant; however, all the point estimates were in favor of agomelatine. Similarly, for discontinuation because of AEs, the point estimates leaned consistently toward agomelatine suggesting its higher tolerability. The probabilities of agomelatine having the highest remission rate and lowest discontinuation (due to AEs) rate were 67% and 68%, respectively. Based on its demonstrated effectiveness and tolerability, agomelatine can be considered as a drug of choice for the treatment of GAD.</p>","PeriodicalId":13698,"journal":{"name":"International Clinical Psychopharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141158576","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-05-11DOI: 10.1097/YIC.0000000000000553
Sabrina Wong, Gia Han Le, Angela T H Kwan, Taeho Greg Rhee, Kayla M Teopiz, Roger C Ho, Bing Cao, Joshua D Rosenblat, Rodrigo Mansur, Roger S McIntyre
Prescription of vesicular monoamine transporter 2 (VMAT2) inhibitors, valbenazine, deutetrabenazine, and tetrabenazine, is becoming increasingly common in persons treated with antipsychotics. Reported suicidality and parkinsonism are safety concerns with VMAT2 inhibitors. Herein, we aim to evaluate the aforementioned safety outcomes using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System. Reporting odds ratios (RORs) and lower limits of 95% confidence intervals of information components (IC025) were calculated to quantify VMAT2 inhibitor-associated adverse events. Acetaminophen was the reference agent. Suicidal ideation was significantly associated with VMAT2 inhibitors, with RORs ranging from 2.38 to 10.67 and IC025 ranging from 0.73 to 2.39. Increased odds of suicidal behavior was observed with tetrabenazine (ROR 3.011, IC025 0.0087), but not deutetrabenazine or valbenazine. Decreased odds of suicide attempts and completed suicide were observed with VMAT2 inhibitors, with RORs ranging from 0.011 to 0.10 (all IC025 < 0). Increased odds of parkinsonism were reported for all VMAT2 inhibitors, with RORs and IC025 ranging from 19.49 to 25.37 and 1.66 to 2.93, respectively. The mixed results with VMAT2 inhibitor-associated suicidality and parkinsonism do not establish causal relationships. The parameters of suicidality may be explained by underlying psychiatric disorders.
{"title":"Risk of VMAT2 inhibitors on suicidality and parkinsonism: report utilizing the United States Food and Drug Administration adverse event reporting system.","authors":"Sabrina Wong, Gia Han Le, Angela T H Kwan, Taeho Greg Rhee, Kayla M Teopiz, Roger C Ho, Bing Cao, Joshua D Rosenblat, Rodrigo Mansur, Roger S McIntyre","doi":"10.1097/YIC.0000000000000553","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/YIC.0000000000000553","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prescription of vesicular monoamine transporter 2 (VMAT2) inhibitors, valbenazine, deutetrabenazine, and tetrabenazine, is becoming increasingly common in persons treated with antipsychotics. Reported suicidality and parkinsonism are safety concerns with VMAT2 inhibitors. Herein, we aim to evaluate the aforementioned safety outcomes using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System. Reporting odds ratios (RORs) and lower limits of 95% confidence intervals of information components (IC025) were calculated to quantify VMAT2 inhibitor-associated adverse events. Acetaminophen was the reference agent. Suicidal ideation was significantly associated with VMAT2 inhibitors, with RORs ranging from 2.38 to 10.67 and IC025 ranging from 0.73 to 2.39. Increased odds of suicidal behavior was observed with tetrabenazine (ROR 3.011, IC025 0.0087), but not deutetrabenazine or valbenazine. Decreased odds of suicide attempts and completed suicide were observed with VMAT2 inhibitors, with RORs ranging from 0.011 to 0.10 (all IC025 < 0). Increased odds of parkinsonism were reported for all VMAT2 inhibitors, with RORs and IC025 ranging from 19.49 to 25.37 and 1.66 to 2.93, respectively. The mixed results with VMAT2 inhibitor-associated suicidality and parkinsonism do not establish causal relationships. The parameters of suicidality may be explained by underlying psychiatric disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":13698,"journal":{"name":"International Clinical Psychopharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140898035","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-05-10DOI: 10.1097/YIC.0000000000000552
Alice Caldiroli, Letizia M Affaticati, Enrico Capuzzi, Davide La Tegola, Fabrizia Colmegna, Massimo Clerici, Antonios Dakanalis, Massimiliano Buoli
A strong interplay exists between sleep and dietary habits, and sleep disturbances have been repeatedly documented in individuals with eating disorders (EDs). The orexin system - implicated in sleep regulation, energy homeostasis, and food reward - may represent a mechanist link between sleep alterations and disordered eating behaviors. Daridorexant is a dual orexin receptor antagonist (DORA) recently approved for the treatment of insomnia, with demonstrated efficacy and tolerability. Owing to its action on orexin neurons, the compound represents an intriguing option for addressing both sleep-related and core symptoms of EDs. By inhibiting motor hyperactivity, daridorexant may reduce excessive physical exercise in individuals with anorexia nervosa (AN) restricting type. Additionally, the compound may exert anti-binge effects, suggesting broad applicability in binge ED, bulimia nervosa, and binge/purging AN. In this framework, daridorexant emerges as a promising therapeutic option, offering a multifaceted approach to improving circadian rhythms, energy balance, and overall quality of life in individuals with diverse ED subtypes.
睡眠与饮食习惯之间存在着强烈的相互作用,睡眠障碍已多次被记录在饮食失调(ED)患者的病例中。奥曲肽系统与睡眠调节、能量平衡和食物奖赏有关,它可能是睡眠改变与饮食失调行为之间的机理联系。Daridorexant 是一种双重奥曲肽受体拮抗剂(DORA),最近被批准用于治疗失眠症,其疗效和耐受性均已得到证实。由于其对奥曲肽神经元的作用,该化合物是解决睡眠相关症状和肥胖症核心症状的一个令人感兴趣的选择。通过抑制运动亢进,daridorexant 可减少神经性厌食症(AN)限制型患者的过度运动。此外,该化合物还可能具有抗暴饮暴食的作用,这表明它广泛适用于暴饮暴食性厌食症、神经性贪食症和暴饮暴食/暴食性厌食症。在这一框架下,daridorexant 成为一种很有前景的治疗选择,它提供了一种多方面的方法来改善昼夜节律、能量平衡和不同 ED 亚型患者的整体生活质量。
{"title":"The potential use of daridorexant in eating disorders: beyond the treatment of insomnia?","authors":"Alice Caldiroli, Letizia M Affaticati, Enrico Capuzzi, Davide La Tegola, Fabrizia Colmegna, Massimo Clerici, Antonios Dakanalis, Massimiliano Buoli","doi":"10.1097/YIC.0000000000000552","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/YIC.0000000000000552","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A strong interplay exists between sleep and dietary habits, and sleep disturbances have been repeatedly documented in individuals with eating disorders (EDs). The orexin system - implicated in sleep regulation, energy homeostasis, and food reward - may represent a mechanist link between sleep alterations and disordered eating behaviors. Daridorexant is a dual orexin receptor antagonist (DORA) recently approved for the treatment of insomnia, with demonstrated efficacy and tolerability. Owing to its action on orexin neurons, the compound represents an intriguing option for addressing both sleep-related and core symptoms of EDs. By inhibiting motor hyperactivity, daridorexant may reduce excessive physical exercise in individuals with anorexia nervosa (AN) restricting type. Additionally, the compound may exert anti-binge effects, suggesting broad applicability in binge ED, bulimia nervosa, and binge/purging AN. In this framework, daridorexant emerges as a promising therapeutic option, offering a multifaceted approach to improving circadian rhythms, energy balance, and overall quality of life in individuals with diverse ED subtypes.</p>","PeriodicalId":13698,"journal":{"name":"International Clinical Psychopharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140898039","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Agomelatine is effective in the treatment of depression, but its effect for post-stroke depression (PSD) remains unclear. This study was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of agomelatine versus SSRIs/SNRIs in treating PSD. We systematically searched Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Library, WanFang Data, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Cqvip databases for double-blind randomized controlled studies comparing the efficacy and safety of agomelatine versus SSRIs/SNRIs for PSD until December 2022. The primary efficacy endpoint was the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) score, and the primary safety endpoint was the incidence of overall adverse reactions. Nine studies comprising 857 patients with PSD were included. After 6-12 weeks of treatment, the HAMD score ( P = 0.16) and the overall response rates ( P = 0.20) in the agomelatine group were comparable to that in the SSRIs/SNRIs group. Participants treated with agomelatine achieved higher Barthel Index scores compared with the SSRIs/SNRIs group ( P = 0.02). There was a significantly lower incidence of overall adverse reactions ( P = 0.008) and neurological adverse reactions ( P < 0.0001) in the agomelatine group. The efficacy of agomelatine for treating PSD is probably comparable to that of SSRIs/SNRIs, and it may improve stroke outcomes with better safety.
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of agomelatine versus SSRIs/SNRIs for post-stroke depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Yicong Chen, Jianle Li, Mengshi Liao, Yinxin He, Chao Dang, Jian Yu, Shihui Xing, Jinsheng Zeng","doi":"10.1097/YIC.0000000000000509","DOIUrl":"10.1097/YIC.0000000000000509","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Agomelatine is effective in the treatment of depression, but its effect for post-stroke depression (PSD) remains unclear. This study was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of agomelatine versus SSRIs/SNRIs in treating PSD. We systematically searched Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Library, WanFang Data, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Cqvip databases for double-blind randomized controlled studies comparing the efficacy and safety of agomelatine versus SSRIs/SNRIs for PSD until December 2022. The primary efficacy endpoint was the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) score, and the primary safety endpoint was the incidence of overall adverse reactions. Nine studies comprising 857 patients with PSD were included. After 6-12 weeks of treatment, the HAMD score ( P = 0.16) and the overall response rates ( P = 0.20) in the agomelatine group were comparable to that in the SSRIs/SNRIs group. Participants treated with agomelatine achieved higher Barthel Index scores compared with the SSRIs/SNRIs group ( P = 0.02). There was a significantly lower incidence of overall adverse reactions ( P = 0.008) and neurological adverse reactions ( P < 0.0001) in the agomelatine group. The efficacy of agomelatine for treating PSD is probably comparable to that of SSRIs/SNRIs, and it may improve stroke outcomes with better safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":13698,"journal":{"name":"International Clinical Psychopharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41125290","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-05-01Epub Date: 2023-08-09DOI: 10.1097/YIC.0000000000000486
Yeganeh Ramazani, Ahmad Nemati, Mohammad Moshiri, Mahdi Talebi, Mohammad Dadkhah, Leila Etemad
This study reports a rare case of high-dose midazolam abuse and Munchausen Syndrome. A 48-year-old female physician was referred by a psychiatrist to the Toxicology Department of Imam Reza Hospital for abstaining from 300 mg/day of parenteral midazolam. She had mimicked the symptoms of Crohn's disease; therefore, she had undergone 15 colonoscopies and 40 times MRI or CT scan, all of which were normal. Six months earlier, she had switched oral methadone to 30 mg/day of intravenous midazolam. She also had several skin lesions on injection sites that she considered pyoderma gangrenosum. When the total daily dose of intravenous midazolam was switched to oral bioequivalence of clonazepam, she could not tolerate withdrawal (Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment Scale-Benzodiazepines = 68). Therefore, she received midazolam again as a continuous intravenous infusion. Within 7 days, the whole dose was replaced by the bioequivalence oral dose of clonazepam. She was also treated with carbamazepine and cognitive behavior therapy. Afterward, she was transferred to the psychiatric ward for further psychiatric treatment. Dependency on a high dose of midazolam could be treated by tapering off the long-acting benzodiazepine.
{"title":"Treatment of high dose of intravenous midazolam abuse: a case report.","authors":"Yeganeh Ramazani, Ahmad Nemati, Mohammad Moshiri, Mahdi Talebi, Mohammad Dadkhah, Leila Etemad","doi":"10.1097/YIC.0000000000000486","DOIUrl":"10.1097/YIC.0000000000000486","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study reports a rare case of high-dose midazolam abuse and Munchausen Syndrome. A 48-year-old female physician was referred by a psychiatrist to the Toxicology Department of Imam Reza Hospital for abstaining from 300 mg/day of parenteral midazolam. She had mimicked the symptoms of Crohn's disease; therefore, she had undergone 15 colonoscopies and 40 times MRI or CT scan, all of which were normal. Six months earlier, she had switched oral methadone to 30 mg/day of intravenous midazolam. She also had several skin lesions on injection sites that she considered pyoderma gangrenosum. When the total daily dose of intravenous midazolam was switched to oral bioequivalence of clonazepam, she could not tolerate withdrawal (Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment Scale-Benzodiazepines = 68). Therefore, she received midazolam again as a continuous intravenous infusion. Within 7 days, the whole dose was replaced by the bioequivalence oral dose of clonazepam. She was also treated with carbamazepine and cognitive behavior therapy. Afterward, she was transferred to the psychiatric ward for further psychiatric treatment. Dependency on a high dose of midazolam could be treated by tapering off the long-acting benzodiazepine.</p>","PeriodicalId":13698,"journal":{"name":"International Clinical Psychopharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10332319","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-05-01Epub Date: 2023-08-07DOI: 10.1097/YIC.0000000000000499
Nisa Deveci, Mustafa Uğurlu, Görkem Karakaş Uğurlu, Esra Kabadayi Şahin, Ezgi Çisil Erdoğan, Ali Çayköylü
Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a challenging psychiatric condition to treat. Previous research has explored various aspects of treatment response, but limited attention has been given to the significance of psychological flexibility and resilience. This study aimed to investigate the correlation between psychological flexibility, resilience, and different dimensions of OCD, as well as their role in treatment response specifically concerning OCD symptom sub-dimensions. The study involved 50 OCD patients and 42 healthy individuals as controls. Participants completed the Dimensional Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (DOCS), Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (AAQ-2), and Resilience Scale for Adults (RS). Initial scale scores were compared to post-treatment scores obtained after a 3-month follow-up using pharmacotherapy. The patient group exhibited significantly higher AAQ-2 scores and lower RS scores compared to the control group. During the post-treatment follow-up, a reduction in DOCS and AAQ-2 scores was observed, along with an increase in RS scores. The impact of differences in AAQ-2 and RS scores on the change in DOCS total scores was analyzed using mixed model linear regression analysis. The results showed a statistically significant effect of changes in AAQ-2 and RS sub-dimension scores on the change in DOCS total scores. The findings highlight the importance of flexibility and resilience in influencing treatment response among patients with OCD. When conventional pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy approaches prove insufficient, interventions focused on enhancing flexibility and resilience may contribute to improved treatment outcomes.
{"title":"The effects of psychological flexibility and resilience on psychopharmacological treatment response in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder.","authors":"Nisa Deveci, Mustafa Uğurlu, Görkem Karakaş Uğurlu, Esra Kabadayi Şahin, Ezgi Çisil Erdoğan, Ali Çayköylü","doi":"10.1097/YIC.0000000000000499","DOIUrl":"10.1097/YIC.0000000000000499","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a challenging psychiatric condition to treat. Previous research has explored various aspects of treatment response, but limited attention has been given to the significance of psychological flexibility and resilience. This study aimed to investigate the correlation between psychological flexibility, resilience, and different dimensions of OCD, as well as their role in treatment response specifically concerning OCD symptom sub-dimensions. The study involved 50 OCD patients and 42 healthy individuals as controls. Participants completed the Dimensional Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (DOCS), Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (AAQ-2), and Resilience Scale for Adults (RS). Initial scale scores were compared to post-treatment scores obtained after a 3-month follow-up using pharmacotherapy. The patient group exhibited significantly higher AAQ-2 scores and lower RS scores compared to the control group. During the post-treatment follow-up, a reduction in DOCS and AAQ-2 scores was observed, along with an increase in RS scores. The impact of differences in AAQ-2 and RS scores on the change in DOCS total scores was analyzed using mixed model linear regression analysis. The results showed a statistically significant effect of changes in AAQ-2 and RS sub-dimension scores on the change in DOCS total scores. The findings highlight the importance of flexibility and resilience in influencing treatment response among patients with OCD. When conventional pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy approaches prove insufficient, interventions focused on enhancing flexibility and resilience may contribute to improved treatment outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":13698,"journal":{"name":"International Clinical Psychopharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9954146","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}