Pub Date : 2024-12-28DOI: 10.1007/s10147-024-02679-w
Noriomi Matsumura, Masaki Mandai
{"title":"PMDA regulatory update on approval and revision of the precautions for use of anticancer drugs; approval of pembrolizumab for locally advanced uterine cervical cancer, and durvalumab and olaparib for advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer in Japan.","authors":"Noriomi Matsumura, Masaki Mandai","doi":"10.1007/s10147-024-02679-w","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-024-02679-w","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":13869,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142893693","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: The implementation of cancer precision medicine in Japan is deeply intertwined with insurance reimbursement policies and requires case-by-case reviews by Molecular Tumor Boards (MTBs), which impose considerable operational burdens on healthcare facilities. The extensive preparation and review times required by MTBs hinder their ability to efficiently assess comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) test results. Despite attempts to optimize MTB operations, significant challenges remain. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of QA Commons, an artificial intelligence-driven system designed to improve treatment planning using CGP analysis. QA Commons utilizes a comprehensive knowledge base of drugs, regulatory approvals, and clinical trials linked to genetic biomarkers, thereby enabling the delivery of consistent and standardized treatment recommendations. Initial assessments revealed that the QA Commons' recommendations closely matched the ideal treatment recommendations (consensus annotations), outperforming the average results of MTBs at Cancer Genomic Medicine Core Hospitals.
Methods: A clinical performance evaluation study will be conducted by comparing the QA Commons' treatment recommendations with those of the Academia Assembly, which includes medical professionals from the Cancer Genomic Medicine Core and Hub Hospitals. One hundred cases selected from the "Registry of the Academia Assembly," based on defined inclusion and exclusion criteria, will be analyzed to assess the concordance of recommendations.
Conclusion: The expected outcomes suggest that QA Commons could reduce the workload of MTB members, standardize the quality of MTB discussions, and provide consistent outcomes in repeated patient consultations. In addition, the global expansion of QA Commons could promote worldwide adoption of Japan's pioneering precision oncology system.
{"title":"A prospective study comparing highly qualified Molecular Tumor Boards with AI-powered software as a medical device.","authors":"Hideaki Bando, Yoichi Naito, Tomoyuki Yamada, Takao Fujisawa, Mitsuho Imai, Yasutoshi Sakamoto, Yusuke Saigusa, Kouji Yamamoto, Yutaka Tomioka, Nobuyoshi Takeshita, Kuniko Sunami, Megumi Futamura, Chiemi Notake, Satoko Aoki, Kazunori Okano, Takayuki Yoshino","doi":"10.1007/s10147-024-02684-z","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-024-02684-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The implementation of cancer precision medicine in Japan is deeply intertwined with insurance reimbursement policies and requires case-by-case reviews by Molecular Tumor Boards (MTBs), which impose considerable operational burdens on healthcare facilities. The extensive preparation and review times required by MTBs hinder their ability to efficiently assess comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) test results. Despite attempts to optimize MTB operations, significant challenges remain. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of QA Commons, an artificial intelligence-driven system designed to improve treatment planning using CGP analysis. QA Commons utilizes a comprehensive knowledge base of drugs, regulatory approvals, and clinical trials linked to genetic biomarkers, thereby enabling the delivery of consistent and standardized treatment recommendations. Initial assessments revealed that the QA Commons' recommendations closely matched the ideal treatment recommendations (consensus annotations), outperforming the average results of MTBs at Cancer Genomic Medicine Core Hospitals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A clinical performance evaluation study will be conducted by comparing the QA Commons' treatment recommendations with those of the Academia Assembly, which includes medical professionals from the Cancer Genomic Medicine Core and Hub Hospitals. One hundred cases selected from the \"Registry of the Academia Assembly,\" based on defined inclusion and exclusion criteria, will be analyzed to assess the concordance of recommendations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The expected outcomes suggest that QA Commons could reduce the workload of MTB members, standardize the quality of MTB discussions, and provide consistent outcomes in repeated patient consultations. In addition, the global expansion of QA Commons could promote worldwide adoption of Japan's pioneering precision oncology system.</p>","PeriodicalId":13869,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142876932","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: The standard for robotic para-aortic lymphadenectomy has not been fully established. Para-aortic lymphadenectomy performed by sharing the same ports with pelvic procedures, a procedure known as dual-docking surgery, can be performed using the latest robotic system. We prospectively examined the ability of standardized dual-docking robotic surgery in endometrial cancer patients.
Methods: This study prospectively verified the feasibility and safety of dual-docking robotic surgeries performed between March 2017 and December 2021. The laterally placed ports were aligned with the umbilicus. Primary outcome was the surgical completion rate; secondary outcomes were blood loss, operative time, unexpected port placement, conversion, complications, length of hospital stay, and survival.
Results: Most patients (14/15, 93%) underwent surgery using our methods without additional port placements, and one patient was converted to laparotomy. Median blood loss was 162 mL (range: 20-685 mL). Median operative time was 183 and 206 min in the upper and lower abdomen. Median number of resected para-aortic lymph nodes was 19 (range: 6-29), and pelvic lymph nodes was 28 (range: 15-42). Although there was no difficulty in moving the forceps intraoperatively, major complications including vessel injury, and pelvic abscesses were observed. The lateral ports could be placed 6-10 cm apart in patients with any range of body type.
Conclusion: Dual-docking surgery for endometrial cancer has the potential to be a standard procedure for robotic endometrial cancer surgery, although a greater number of cases are needed to acquire proficiency.
{"title":"Robotic dual-docking surgery for para-aortic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer: a prospective feasibility study.","authors":"Shintaro Yanazume, Hiroaki Kobayashi, Takashi Ushiwaka, Shinichi Togami, Masaki Kamio","doi":"10.1007/s10147-024-02635-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-024-02635-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The standard for robotic para-aortic lymphadenectomy has not been fully established. Para-aortic lymphadenectomy performed by sharing the same ports with pelvic procedures, a procedure known as dual-docking surgery, can be performed using the latest robotic system. We prospectively examined the ability of standardized dual-docking robotic surgery in endometrial cancer patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study prospectively verified the feasibility and safety of dual-docking robotic surgeries performed between March 2017 and December 2021. The laterally placed ports were aligned with the umbilicus. Primary outcome was the surgical completion rate; secondary outcomes were blood loss, operative time, unexpected port placement, conversion, complications, length of hospital stay, and survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most patients (14/15, 93%) underwent surgery using our methods without additional port placements, and one patient was converted to laparotomy. Median blood loss was 162 mL (range: 20-685 mL). Median operative time was 183 and 206 min in the upper and lower abdomen. Median number of resected para-aortic lymph nodes was 19 (range: 6-29), and pelvic lymph nodes was 28 (range: 15-42). Although there was no difficulty in moving the forceps intraoperatively, major complications including vessel injury, and pelvic abscesses were observed. The lateral ports could be placed 6-10 cm apart in patients with any range of body type.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dual-docking surgery for endometrial cancer has the potential to be a standard procedure for robotic endometrial cancer surgery, although a greater number of cases are needed to acquire proficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":13869,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142872081","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-19DOI: 10.1007/s10147-024-02674-1
Mohamed Shalaby, Rasha M Allam, Mohamed A Elkordy, Mohammad Taher
Background and objective: Lymph node metastasis (LNM) in soft tissue sarcoma (STS) of the extremities is relatively rare. We aimed to evaluate the prognosis and the survival of patients with LNM and correlate them to the pattern of metastasis.
Methods: A retrospective study of patients diagnosed with STS of the extremities from 2015 to 2019.
Results: 111/1506 patients (7.4%) had LNM. Nodal metastasis was correlated significantly with old age, advanced tumor stages, high-grade tumors, presence of Lymphovascular invasion (LVI), and resection margins < = 2 cm. Metachronous LNM was documented in 96 patients (86.5%) and synchronous LNM in 15 patients (13.5%). The 6-year overall survival (OS) was 36.3% for those with LNM and 52.9% for those without LNM. The 6-year disease-free survival (DFS) was 5.7% for those with LNM and 32.6% for those without LNM. Metachronus pattern of LNM showed a significantly poorer outcome regarding 6-year OS and DFS than the synchronous pattern.
Conclusions: LNM significantly negatively predicts OS and DFS in the extremities' STS. In particular, the metachronous pattern of LNM indicates a grave prognosis as these patients are supposed to harbor an occult LNM at presentation and were not subjected to lymphadenectomy at their initial primary treatment surgery. Therefore, seeking a valid noninvasive diagnostic tool such as sentinel lymph node biopsy to detect nodal metastasis is necessary.
{"title":"Prognostic significance of lymph node metastasis of soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities. National cancer institute experience.","authors":"Mohamed Shalaby, Rasha M Allam, Mohamed A Elkordy, Mohammad Taher","doi":"10.1007/s10147-024-02674-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-024-02674-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Lymph node metastasis (LNM) in soft tissue sarcoma (STS) of the extremities is relatively rare. We aimed to evaluate the prognosis and the survival of patients with LNM and correlate them to the pattern of metastasis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study of patients diagnosed with STS of the extremities from 2015 to 2019.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>111/1506 patients (7.4%) had LNM. Nodal metastasis was correlated significantly with old age, advanced tumor stages, high-grade tumors, presence of Lymphovascular invasion (LVI), and resection margins < = 2 cm. Metachronous LNM was documented in 96 patients (86.5%) and synchronous LNM in 15 patients (13.5%). The 6-year overall survival (OS) was 36.3% for those with LNM and 52.9% for those without LNM. The 6-year disease-free survival (DFS) was 5.7% for those with LNM and 32.6% for those without LNM. Metachronus pattern of LNM showed a significantly poorer outcome regarding 6-year OS and DFS than the synchronous pattern.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LNM significantly negatively predicts OS and DFS in the extremities' STS. In particular, the metachronous pattern of LNM indicates a grave prognosis as these patients are supposed to harbor an occult LNM at presentation and were not subjected to lymphadenectomy at their initial primary treatment surgery. Therefore, seeking a valid noninvasive diagnostic tool such as sentinel lymph node biopsy to detect nodal metastasis is necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":13869,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142864172","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSIs) combined with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for treating castration-sensitive metastatic prostate cancer in Japanese patients, focusing on the effects on time to the development of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) and overall survival (OS).
Methods: This retrospective muti-institutional analysis included 332 patients diagnosed with metastatic prostate cancer in Japan between 2018 and 2023. The patients were categorized into two groups: patients receiving ADT combined with ARSI (ARSI group) and those receiving ADT alone or with bicalutamide (ADT group). Data on demographics, treatments, and outcomes were compared using the Kaplan-Meier method with propensity score matching.
Results: We found an increasing trend in ARSI use over time. The median time to CRPC was significantly longer in the ARSI group than in the ADT group (47.1 vs. 15.2 months, p < 0.001); however, no significant differences in OS were observed before or after propensity score matching. The 1-year-survival rate of patients in the ARSI group tended to be higher than that of patients in the ADT group in subgroups with high tumor volume (96.1% vs. 85.0%) and high Gleason grade (98.1% vs. 85.9%).
Conclusions: Adding ARSI to ADT extended the time to CRPC but did not significantly affect OS. However, it potentially suppressed the short-term risk of death in high-risk subgroups. This study highlights the need for further research to explore the characteristics of Japanese patients with metastatic prostate cancer in whom upfront ARSIs are effective.
{"title":"Efficacy of androgen receptor signaling inhibitors in combination with androgen deprivation therapy for castration-sensitive metastatic prostate cancer: a retrospective analysis in a Japanese cohort.","authors":"Minekatsu Taga, Takeshi Sasaki, Shinichiro Higashi, Shoichi Kimura, Atsuro Sawada, Katsuki Tsuchiyama, Takahiro Inoue, Toshiyuki Kamoto, Naoki Terada","doi":"10.1007/s10147-024-02670-5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-024-02670-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSIs) combined with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for treating castration-sensitive metastatic prostate cancer in Japanese patients, focusing on the effects on time to the development of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) and overall survival (OS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective muti-institutional analysis included 332 patients diagnosed with metastatic prostate cancer in Japan between 2018 and 2023. The patients were categorized into two groups: patients receiving ADT combined with ARSI (ARSI group) and those receiving ADT alone or with bicalutamide (ADT group). Data on demographics, treatments, and outcomes were compared using the Kaplan-Meier method with propensity score matching.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found an increasing trend in ARSI use over time. The median time to CRPC was significantly longer in the ARSI group than in the ADT group (47.1 vs. 15.2 months, p < 0.001); however, no significant differences in OS were observed before or after propensity score matching. The 1-year-survival rate of patients in the ARSI group tended to be higher than that of patients in the ADT group in subgroups with high tumor volume (96.1% vs. 85.0%) and high Gleason grade (98.1% vs. 85.9%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adding ARSI to ADT extended the time to CRPC but did not significantly affect OS. However, it potentially suppressed the short-term risk of death in high-risk subgroups. This study highlights the need for further research to explore the characteristics of Japanese patients with metastatic prostate cancer in whom upfront ARSIs are effective.</p>","PeriodicalId":13869,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142846566","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-18DOI: 10.1007/s10147-024-02671-4
Tomohiro Miyoshi, Masahiro Tsuboi
The efficacy of molecularly targeted agents has been established in advanced lung cancer, and their indications have recently expanded to include perioperative treatment of resectable lung cancer. For epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive patients, postoperative adjuvant therapy with EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) is available in Japan following the results of the ADAURA trial. In addition to EGFR-TKIs, postoperative adjuvant therapy with TKIs targeting anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) and rearranged during transfection (RET) is expected to be established. On the other hand, because adjuvant chemotherapy is ineffective in patients who have been completely cured of cancer through surgery alone, the balance between efficacy and adverse effects must be considered, and further studies will be needed to determine the necessary and sufficient dosage and the appropriate duration of administration. In addition, the cost of adjuvant chemotherapy has recently become an issue that cannot be overlooked. Therefore, it will be imperative to develop biomarkers to effectively narrow down the patients who benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy.
{"title":"Postoperative adjuvant therapy with molecularly targeted agents for non-small cell lung cancer.","authors":"Tomohiro Miyoshi, Masahiro Tsuboi","doi":"10.1007/s10147-024-02671-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-024-02671-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The efficacy of molecularly targeted agents has been established in advanced lung cancer, and their indications have recently expanded to include perioperative treatment of resectable lung cancer. For epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive patients, postoperative adjuvant therapy with EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) is available in Japan following the results of the ADAURA trial. In addition to EGFR-TKIs, postoperative adjuvant therapy with TKIs targeting anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) and rearranged during transfection (RET) is expected to be established. On the other hand, because adjuvant chemotherapy is ineffective in patients who have been completely cured of cancer through surgery alone, the balance between efficacy and adverse effects must be considered, and further studies will be needed to determine the necessary and sufficient dosage and the appropriate duration of administration. In addition, the cost of adjuvant chemotherapy has recently become an issue that cannot be overlooked. Therefore, it will be imperative to develop biomarkers to effectively narrow down the patients who benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":13869,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142846567","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Osteosarcoma, the most common primary bone malignancy, has a complex genetic basis and two incidence peaks. In younger patients, the standard treatment involves wide surgical resection combined with adjuvant chemotherapy; however, the role of chemotherapy in elderly patients remains controversial. The aims of this study were to investigate genetic differences between younger and elderly patients with osteosarcoma and to identify genetic signatures associated with chemotherapy response.
Methods: Genetic alterations were analyzed using cancer genome profiling data for 204 patients with osteosarcoma obtained from the Center for Cancer Genomics and Advanced Therapeutics.
Results: The mutation spectrum was consistent with previous results for osteosarcoma. CCNE1, MCL1, MYC, and RB1 alterations were significantly associated with a younger age, while CDK4, CDKN2A, CDKN2B, H3F3A, KMT2D, MDM2, RAC1, and SETD2 alterations were significantly associated with an older age. Age, unsupervised clustering of gene alterations, and MYC amplifications were significantly associated with the response to ifosfamide. Notably, both clustered mutation signatures and MYC amplification were correlated with age.
Conclusions: These findings suggest that distinct oncogenic mechanisms contribute to differential sensitivity to chemotherapy in younger and elderly patients. Cancer genome profiling may aid in chemotherapy selection, and its early implementation is recommended to optimize treatment strategies.
背景:骨肉瘤是最常见的原发性骨恶性肿瘤,具有复杂的遗传基础和两个发病高峰。对于年轻患者,标准治疗包括广泛手术切除和辅助化疗;然而,化疗在老年患者中的作用仍存在争议。本研究旨在调查年轻和老年骨肉瘤患者的基因差异,并确定与化疗反应相关的基因特征:方法:利用癌症基因组学和高级治疗中心(Center for Cancer Genomics and Advanced Therapeutics)获得的204名骨肉瘤患者的癌症基因组图谱数据分析基因改变:结果:突变谱与以往骨肉瘤的研究结果一致。CCNE1、MCL1、MYC和RB1基因突变与年龄较小显著相关,而CDK4、CDKN2A、CDKN2B、H3F3A、KMT2D、MDM2、RAC1和SETD2基因突变与年龄较大显著相关。年龄、基因改变的无监督聚类和MYC扩增与伊佛酰胺的反应显著相关。值得注意的是,聚类突变特征和MYC扩增均与年龄相关:这些研究结果表明,不同的致癌机制导致了年轻患者和老年患者对化疗的不同敏感性。癌症基因组图谱分析可能有助于化疗选择,建议尽早实施以优化治疗策略。
{"title":"Age-related genomic alterations and chemotherapy sensitivity in osteosarcoma: insights from cancer genome profiling analyses.","authors":"Hidetatsu Outani, Masachika Ikegami, Yoshinori Imura, Sho Nakai, Haruna Takami, Yuki Kotani, Akitomo Inoue, Seiji Okada","doi":"10.1007/s10147-024-02673-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-024-02673-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Osteosarcoma, the most common primary bone malignancy, has a complex genetic basis and two incidence peaks. In younger patients, the standard treatment involves wide surgical resection combined with adjuvant chemotherapy; however, the role of chemotherapy in elderly patients remains controversial. The aims of this study were to investigate genetic differences between younger and elderly patients with osteosarcoma and to identify genetic signatures associated with chemotherapy response.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Genetic alterations were analyzed using cancer genome profiling data for 204 patients with osteosarcoma obtained from the Center for Cancer Genomics and Advanced Therapeutics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mutation spectrum was consistent with previous results for osteosarcoma. CCNE1, MCL1, MYC, and RB1 alterations were significantly associated with a younger age, while CDK4, CDKN2A, CDKN2B, H3F3A, KMT2D, MDM2, RAC1, and SETD2 alterations were significantly associated with an older age. Age, unsupervised clustering of gene alterations, and MYC amplifications were significantly associated with the response to ifosfamide. Notably, both clustered mutation signatures and MYC amplification were correlated with age.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest that distinct oncogenic mechanisms contribute to differential sensitivity to chemotherapy in younger and elderly patients. Cancer genome profiling may aid in chemotherapy selection, and its early implementation is recommended to optimize treatment strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":13869,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142835650","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: In Japan, since 2014, new treatments such as androgen receptor signaling inhibitors and cabazitaxel have become applicable for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), leading to dramatic changes in treatment options.
Objective: This study aims to evaluate the impact of recent advancements in treatment options on the overall survival (OS) of patients diagnosed with de novo metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) in Japan.
Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 2450 Japanese men diagnosed with de novo mCSPC between 2008 and 2018. Patients were stratified into two groups based on the period of diagnosis: an earlier period (2008-2013) and a later period (2014-2018). OS was compared between earlier and later periods using Kaplan-Meier analysis in total and propensity score matched subpopulation as well as risk-stratified subgroups.
Results: Patients diagnosed in the later period exhibited significantly improved OS compared to those diagnosed in the earlier period. The risk score, calculated based on ISUP grade group, LDH levels, and ALP levels, was a poor prognostic factor. In the later period, compared to the earlier period, there was no improvement in OS in the favorable-risk group, but a significant improvement was observed in the poor-risk group.
Conclusion: It was suggested that the introduction of novel androgen receptor signaling inhibitors and chemotherapy treatment regimens since 2014 has led to improved survival outcomes for patients with de novo mCSPC, particularly those with poor-risk profiles. The findings highlight the impact of recent advancements in treatment on the prognosis of patients with metastatic prostate cancer in Japan.
{"title":"Improved prognosis of de novo metastatic prostate cancer after an introduction of life-prolonging agents for castration-resistant prostate cancer.","authors":"Tokiyoshi Tanegashima, Masaki Shiota, Naoki Terada, Toshihiro Saito, Akira Yokomizo, Naoki Kohei, Takayuki Goto, Sadafumi Kawamura, Yasuhiro Hashimoto, Atsushi Takahashi, Takahiro Kimura, Ken-Ichi Tabata, Ryotaro Tomida, Kohei Hashimoto, Toshihiko Sakurai, Toru Shimazui, Shinichi Sakamoto, Manabu Kamiyama, Nobumichi Tanaka, Koji Mitsuzuka, Takuma Kato, Shintaro Narita, Hiroaki Yasumoto, Shogo Teraoka, Masashi Kato, Takahiro Osawa, Yoshiyuki Nagumo, Hiroaki Matsumoto, Hideki Enokida, Takayuki Sugiyama, Kentaro Kuroiwa, Hiroshi Kitamura, Toshiyuki Kamoto, Masatoshi Eto","doi":"10.1007/s10147-024-02681-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-024-02681-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In Japan, since 2014, new treatments such as androgen receptor signaling inhibitors and cabazitaxel have become applicable for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), leading to dramatic changes in treatment options.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the impact of recent advancements in treatment options on the overall survival (OS) of patients diagnosed with de novo metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) in Japan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 2450 Japanese men diagnosed with de novo mCSPC between 2008 and 2018. Patients were stratified into two groups based on the period of diagnosis: an earlier period (2008-2013) and a later period (2014-2018). OS was compared between earlier and later periods using Kaplan-Meier analysis in total and propensity score matched subpopulation as well as risk-stratified subgroups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients diagnosed in the later period exhibited significantly improved OS compared to those diagnosed in the earlier period. The risk score, calculated based on ISUP grade group, LDH levels, and ALP levels, was a poor prognostic factor. In the later period, compared to the earlier period, there was no improvement in OS in the favorable-risk group, but a significant improvement was observed in the poor-risk group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It was suggested that the introduction of novel androgen receptor signaling inhibitors and chemotherapy treatment regimens since 2014 has led to improved survival outcomes for patients with de novo mCSPC, particularly those with poor-risk profiles. The findings highlight the impact of recent advancements in treatment on the prognosis of patients with metastatic prostate cancer in Japan.</p>","PeriodicalId":13869,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142835651","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Treatment-related skin reactions (TRSRs) induced by enfortumab vedotin (EV) targeting nectin-4 are among the most common adverse events. However, their association with survival and treatment response is poorly understood.
Methods: We retrospectively identified patients who received EV from December 2021 to April 2023 at Nagoya University Hospital and its affiliated facilities and extracted clinical data from their medical records. We evaluated cancer-specific survival (CSS) and progression-free survival (PFS) as survival outcomes and overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) as treatment responses between patients with and without TRSRs.
Results: In total, 67 eligible patients were identified. Thirty-four patients experienced TRSRs, and the remaining 33 did not experience TRSRs. The median follow-up period was 8 months. Patients in the TRSRs group demonstrated significantly longer median CSS (15 vs. 8 months; p = 0.003) and median PFS (10 vs. 5 months; p < 0.001) than the non-TRSRs. Regarding treatment response, the patients in the TRSRs group showed a favorable, albeit nonsignificant, treatment response trend compared with those in the non-TRSRs group (ORR, 73.5% vs. 51.5%; p = 0.107; DCR, 91.2 % vs. 81.8%; p = 0.444).
Conclusions: Patients with TRSRs demonstrated more prolonged survival and superior treatment responses to EV treatment. The role of TRSR as a surrogate marker of EV's efficacy should be further explored in prospective and sufficiently powered studies.
背景:针对nectin-4的enfortumab vedotin (EV)诱导的治疗相关皮肤反应(TRSRs)是最常见的不良事件之一。然而,它们与生存和治疗反应的关系尚不清楚。方法:回顾性筛选2021年12月至2023年4月在名古屋大学医院及其附属机构接受EV治疗的患者,并从其病历中提取临床数据。我们评估了癌症特异性生存期(CSS)和无进展生存期(PFS)作为生存结局,评估了总缓解率(ORR)和疾病控制率(DCR)作为有无trrs患者的治疗反应。结果:共筛选出67例符合条件的患者。34例患者发生TRSRs,其余33例未发生TRSRs。中位随访期为8个月。trrs组患者的中位CSS明显延长(15个月vs 8个月;p = 0.003)和中位PFS(10个月vs. 5个月;p < 0.001)。在治疗反应方面,与非TRSRs组相比,TRSRs组患者表现出较好的治疗反应趋势(ORR, 73.5% vs. 51.5%;P = 0.107;DCR, 91.2% vs. 81.8%;P = 0.444)。结论:TRSRs患者对EV治疗表现出更长的生存期和更好的治疗反应。TRSR作为EV疗效替代标志物的作用需要在前瞻性和足够有力的研究中进一步探讨。
{"title":"Treatment-related skin reactions in enfortumab vedotin as a surrogate marker of survival and treatment response.","authors":"Jun Nagayama, Satoshi Inoue, Hiroki Sai, Akira Hayakawa, Yuri Yuguchi, Tomohide Suzuki, Hirotaka Matsui, Takuma Yuba, Koya Morishita, Shusuke Akamatsu","doi":"10.1007/s10147-024-02672-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-024-02672-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Treatment-related skin reactions (TRSRs) induced by enfortumab vedotin (EV) targeting nectin-4 are among the most common adverse events. However, their association with survival and treatment response is poorly understood.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively identified patients who received EV from December 2021 to April 2023 at Nagoya University Hospital and its affiliated facilities and extracted clinical data from their medical records. We evaluated cancer-specific survival (CSS) and progression-free survival (PFS) as survival outcomes and overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) as treatment responses between patients with and without TRSRs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 67 eligible patients were identified. Thirty-four patients experienced TRSRs, and the remaining 33 did not experience TRSRs. The median follow-up period was 8 months. Patients in the TRSRs group demonstrated significantly longer median CSS (15 vs. 8 months; p = 0.003) and median PFS (10 vs. 5 months; p < 0.001) than the non-TRSRs. Regarding treatment response, the patients in the TRSRs group showed a favorable, albeit nonsignificant, treatment response trend compared with those in the non-TRSRs group (ORR, 73.5% vs. 51.5%; p = 0.107; DCR, 91.2 % vs. 81.8%; p = 0.444).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with TRSRs demonstrated more prolonged survival and superior treatment responses to EV treatment. The role of TRSR as a surrogate marker of EV's efficacy should be further explored in prospective and sufficiently powered studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":13869,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142835652","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Febrile neutropenia (FN) is a recognised adverse event associated with chemotherapy. This study investigates the impact of atezolizumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor, on the incidence of FN in patients with non-small cell lung cancer receiving concurrent chemotherapy in Japan.
Methods: This post-marketing database study was conducted using data from patients with non-small cell lung cancer provided by Medical Data Vision Co., Ltd. covering April 2008 to present. The primary outcome measured was FN incidence, and its causal association with atezolizumab use was examined by comparing the atezolizumab plus bevacizumab plus carboplatin plus paclitaxel [ABCP])-containing regimen to the BCP control group. The data period was from 1 September, 2015, to 31 December, 2021, including approval date of this drug, 21 December, 2018.
Results: The database identified 301 subjects for the ABCP regimen (exposure) group, 44 for the BCP regimen (cohort design control) group during the same period, and 207 for BCP regimen (historical cohort design control) group before the approval of atezolizumab. For historical cohort design, the incidence and adjusted incidence ratios of febrile neutropenia in the exposure group to the control group were 6.13 (95% CI 2.78-13.49) and 8.19 (95% CI 3.79-25.33), respectively. Sensitivity analysis showed FN occurred in 17% (52/301) of the exposure group, 4.5% (2/44) of the cohort design control group, and 3% (7/207) of the historical cohort design control group.
Conclusions: The incidence of FN was higher in the exposure group. Considering the study results, special caution is needed for FN occurrence in patients receiving atezolizumab.
背景:发热性中性粒细胞减少症(FN)是公认的与化疗相关的不良事件。本研究调查了一种免疫检查点抑制剂atezolizumab对日本接受同期化疗的非小细胞肺癌患者FN发生率的影响。方法:本上市后数据库研究使用由Medical data Vision Co., Ltd.提供的2008年4月至今的非小细胞肺癌患者数据。测量的主要结局是FN发生率,并通过将含atezolizumab +贝伐单抗+卡铂+紫杉醇[ABCP])的方案与BCP对照组进行比较,来检查其与atezolizumab使用的因果关系。数据期为2015年9月1日至2021年12月31日,包括该药物的批准日期2018年12月21日。结果:在atezolizumab获批前,该数据库共鉴定出ABCP方案(暴露)组301例,BCP方案(队列设计对照)组44例,BCP方案(历史队列设计对照)组207例。在历史队列设计中,暴露组与对照组相比发热性中性粒细胞减少症的发生率和调整后的发生率分别为6.13 (95% CI 2.78-13.49)和8.19 (95% CI 3.79-25.33)。敏感性分析显示,暴露组FN发生率为17%(52/301),队列设计对照组为4.5%(2/44),历史队列设计对照组为3%(7/207)。结论:暴露组FN发生率较高。考虑到研究结果,需要特别注意接受atezolizumab的患者发生FN。
{"title":"Evaluating the impact of atezolizumab on febrile neutropenia occurrence in patients with NSCLC undergoing chemotherapy in Japan: a real-world post-marketing database study.","authors":"Sayuri Nakane, Akinori Yuri, Yuki Miyano, Kana Yamada, Erika Nakatsuji, Nobuki Takei, Yasuhiro Igarashi, Ryousuke Harada","doi":"10.1007/s10147-024-02669-y","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-024-02669-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Febrile neutropenia (FN) is a recognised adverse event associated with chemotherapy. This study investigates the impact of atezolizumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor, on the incidence of FN in patients with non-small cell lung cancer receiving concurrent chemotherapy in Japan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This post-marketing database study was conducted using data from patients with non-small cell lung cancer provided by Medical Data Vision Co., Ltd. covering April 2008 to present. The primary outcome measured was FN incidence, and its causal association with atezolizumab use was examined by comparing the atezolizumab plus bevacizumab plus carboplatin plus paclitaxel [ABCP])-containing regimen to the BCP control group. The data period was from 1 September, 2015, to 31 December, 2021, including approval date of this drug, 21 December, 2018.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The database identified 301 subjects for the ABCP regimen (exposure) group, 44 for the BCP regimen (cohort design control) group during the same period, and 207 for BCP regimen (historical cohort design control) group before the approval of atezolizumab. For historical cohort design, the incidence and adjusted incidence ratios of febrile neutropenia in the exposure group to the control group were 6.13 (95% CI 2.78-13.49) and 8.19 (95% CI 3.79-25.33), respectively. Sensitivity analysis showed FN occurred in 17% (52/301) of the exposure group, 4.5% (2/44) of the cohort design control group, and 3% (7/207) of the historical cohort design control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The incidence of FN was higher in the exposure group. Considering the study results, special caution is needed for FN occurrence in patients receiving atezolizumab.</p>","PeriodicalId":13869,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142827789","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}