Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-10-07DOI: 10.1007/s10147-025-02888-x
Lu-Yang Zhang, Sen Zhang, Xuan Zhao, Hao Li, Lu Zang, Jun-Jun Ma, Min-Hua Zheng, Abe Fingerhut
Background: The safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant FLOT (Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, Oxaliplatin, Docetaxel) and DOS (Docetaxel, Oxaliplatin, S-1) regimens for locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) have not been compared.
Methods: Patients with histologically confirmed LAGC (stage ≥ cT3 or cN + , no metastasis) treated between 2017-2021 were retrospectively included and propensity-matched into FLOT (4 cycles, n = 72) and DOS (3 cycles, n = 72) groups. Outcomes included RECIST response, grade 3/4 adverse events, surgical/pathological results, and R0 resection rates, and long-term survival (overall survival [OS] and progression-free survival [PFS]).
Results: RECIST response rates were 41.7% (FLOT) vs. 47.2% (DOS); R0 resection rates were 63.9% vs. 72.2%. No significant differences were observed in operative time, blood loss, hospital stay, histopathological regression (TRG1a: 2.8% vs. 8.3%; TRG1b: 13.9% vs. 16.7%), postoperative morbidity (29.8% vs. 24.5%), or grade 3/4 toxicity (20.8% vs. 13.9%). The 5-year OS rates were 42.7% and 50.4% (p = 0.652), and the PFS rates were 33.7% and 41.4% (p = 0.548) for the FLOT and DOS groups, respectively.
Conclusion: DOS demonstrated no significant but favorable feasibility, safety, and efficacy compared to FLOT in LAGC. Shorter hospital stay with DOS may enhance patient comfort and reduce healthcare burden.
背景:新辅助FLOT(氟尿嘧啶、亚叶酸钙、奥沙利铂、多西紫杉醇)方案和DOS(多西紫杉醇、奥沙利铂、S-1)方案治疗局部晚期胃癌(LAGC)的安全性和有效性尚未比较。方法:回顾性纳入2017-2021年间组织学证实的LAGC(≥cT3期或cN +期,无转移)患者,并将其倾向匹配为FLOT(4个周期,n = 72)和DOS(3个周期,n = 72)组。结果包括RECIST反应、3/4级不良事件、手术/病理结果、R0切除率和长期生存(总生存期[OS]和无进展生存期[PFS])。结果:RECIST有效率为41.7% (FLOT) vs. 47.2% (DOS);R0切除率分别为63.9%和72.2%。在手术时间、出血量、住院时间、组织病理退化(TRG1a: 2.8% vs. 8.3%; TRG1b: 13.9% vs. 16.7%)、术后发病率(29.8% vs. 24.5%)或3/4级毒性(20.8% vs. 13.9%)方面均无显著差异。FLOT组和DOS组的5年OS分别为42.7%和50.4% (p = 0.652), PFS分别为33.7%和41.4% (p = 0.548)。结论:与FLOT相比,DOS在LAGC中的可行性、安全性和有效性不显著,但具有良好的疗效。缩短DOS住院时间可提高患者舒适度,减轻医疗负担。
{"title":"FLOT vs DOS neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric cancer: propensity score analysis.","authors":"Lu-Yang Zhang, Sen Zhang, Xuan Zhao, Hao Li, Lu Zang, Jun-Jun Ma, Min-Hua Zheng, Abe Fingerhut","doi":"10.1007/s10147-025-02888-x","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10147-025-02888-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant FLOT (Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, Oxaliplatin, Docetaxel) and DOS (Docetaxel, Oxaliplatin, S-1) regimens for locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) have not been compared.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with histologically confirmed LAGC (stage ≥ cT3 or cN + , no metastasis) treated between 2017-2021 were retrospectively included and propensity-matched into FLOT (4 cycles, n = 72) and DOS (3 cycles, n = 72) groups. Outcomes included RECIST response, grade 3/4 adverse events, surgical/pathological results, and R0 resection rates, and long-term survival (overall survival [OS] and progression-free survival [PFS]).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>RECIST response rates were 41.7% (FLOT) vs. 47.2% (DOS); R0 resection rates were 63.9% vs. 72.2%. No significant differences were observed in operative time, blood loss, hospital stay, histopathological regression (TRG1a: 2.8% vs. 8.3%; TRG1b: 13.9% vs. 16.7%), postoperative morbidity (29.8% vs. 24.5%), or grade 3/4 toxicity (20.8% vs. 13.9%). The 5-year OS rates were 42.7% and 50.4% (p = 0.652), and the PFS rates were 33.7% and 41.4% (p = 0.548) for the FLOT and DOS groups, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DOS demonstrated no significant but favorable feasibility, safety, and efficacy compared to FLOT in LAGC. Shorter hospital stay with DOS may enhance patient comfort and reduce healthcare burden.</p>","PeriodicalId":13869,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"2559-2566"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145238346","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-10-11DOI: 10.1007/s10147-025-02886-z
Midori Kadowaki, Chikako Shimizu, Shimon Tashiro, Yoko Takada, Tsunakuni Ikka
Background: Discussions on do-not-attempt-resuscitation (DNAR) orders are considered critical end-of-life discussions with patients with advanced cancer; however, patients are not necessarily involved in these discussions. Therefore, we aimed to clarify oncologists' practice, perceptions, values, and attitudes regarding DNAR orders and to identify factors associated with oncologists' attitudes toward confirming patients' preference for DNAR orders.
Methods: Oncologists in designated cancer hospitals in Japan were surveyed using a self-administered questionnaire. Multivariate analyses were performed to identify attributes to attitudes toward confirmation of patients' preferences.
Results: Among 688 participating oncologists, 477 (69%) indicated that they would confirm patients' preferences when issuing a DNAR order if they were competent. Independent variables for positive attitudes toward confirming patients' preferences before issuing DNAR orders included "Talking about DNAR is severely distressing for family" (Odds ratio (OR) = 2.459, p < 0.001) and "It is burdensome to prepare for discussions regarding DNAR orders" (OR = 1.450, p = 0.002) and the value "Non-maleficence" (OR = 1.384, p = 0.012). On the other hand, independent variables for negative attitudes included "Patients do not need to know about DNAR if their family members know about it" (OR = 0.329, p < 0.001) and "Talking about DNAR orders is severely distressing for patients" (OR = 0.443, p ≤ 0.001) and the values "Preference of family" (OR = 0.687, p = 0.012), "Lack of training and education on discussing DNAR orders," (OR = 0.731, p = 0.006), and "It is hard to talk about death" (OR = 0.758, p = 0.026).
Conclusion: Oncologists' discomfort talking about death and their perceived distress for patients and their families were associated with their attitudes towards discussions about DNAR orders.
{"title":"Factors in oncologists' attitudes on do-not-attempt-resuscitation orders for patients with cancer.","authors":"Midori Kadowaki, Chikako Shimizu, Shimon Tashiro, Yoko Takada, Tsunakuni Ikka","doi":"10.1007/s10147-025-02886-z","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10147-025-02886-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Discussions on do-not-attempt-resuscitation (DNAR) orders are considered critical end-of-life discussions with patients with advanced cancer; however, patients are not necessarily involved in these discussions. Therefore, we aimed to clarify oncologists' practice, perceptions, values, and attitudes regarding DNAR orders and to identify factors associated with oncologists' attitudes toward confirming patients' preference for DNAR orders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Oncologists in designated cancer hospitals in Japan were surveyed using a self-administered questionnaire. Multivariate analyses were performed to identify attributes to attitudes toward confirmation of patients' preferences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 688 participating oncologists, 477 (69%) indicated that they would confirm patients' preferences when issuing a DNAR order if they were competent. Independent variables for positive attitudes toward confirming patients' preferences before issuing DNAR orders included \"Talking about DNAR is severely distressing for family\" (Odds ratio (OR) = 2.459, p < 0.001) and \"It is burdensome to prepare for discussions regarding DNAR orders\" (OR = 1.450, p = 0.002) and the value \"Non-maleficence\" (OR = 1.384, p = 0.012). On the other hand, independent variables for negative attitudes included \"Patients do not need to know about DNAR if their family members know about it\" (OR = 0.329, p < 0.001) and \"Talking about DNAR orders is severely distressing for patients\" (OR = 0.443, p ≤ 0.001) and the values \"Preference of family\" (OR = 0.687, p = 0.012), \"Lack of training and education on discussing DNAR orders,\" (OR = 0.731, p = 0.006), and \"It is hard to talk about death\" (OR = 0.758, p = 0.026).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Oncologists' discomfort talking about death and their perceived distress for patients and their families were associated with their attitudes towards discussions about DNAR orders.</p>","PeriodicalId":13869,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"2662-2685"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145274510","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Chemotherapy-induced hiccups are one of the frequently appearing adverse events. Previous reports have suggested that cisplatin (CDDP) combined with dexamethasone and neurokinin 1 (NK1) receptor antagonists is particularly associated with these symptoms. Consequently, we aimed to identify additional factors involved in the development of problematic hiccups during the real-world treatment.
Methods: Patients with thoracic cancer first receiving CDDP-containing treatment (≥ 75 mg/m2) with dexamethasone, palonosetron, and aprepitant were retrospectively assessed (n = 286). The primary endpoint was the evaluation of risk factors for grade ≥ 2 hiccups during the first cycle. Secondary endpoints were the evaluation of factors for all-grade symptoms and the efficacy of rescue medication.
Results: The incidence of grade ≥ 2 hiccups was 32.9%, with all-grade symptoms of 44.8%. Grade 3 severe hiccups were observed in 5.2% of the patients. Most patients (96.8%) received metoclopramide as first-line treatment, and the efficacy of the first medication was confirmed in 59.6% of patients. Multivariate logistic regression analyses identified male sex, baseline hypoalbuminemia, and concomitant bevacizumab as significant risk factors for grade ≥ 2 problematic hiccups (adjusted odds ratio with 95% confidence interval 10.32 [4.38-24.32], P < 0.0001 for males; 2.41 [1.06-5.50], P = 0.04 for hypoalbuminemia; and 3.42 [1.25-9.36], P = 0.02 for concomitant bevacizumab). Moreover, male sex was identified as a singular risk factor for all-grade symptoms (7.94 [4.14-15.22], P < 0.0001).
Conclusion: Our study revealed that male sex, hypoalbuminemia, and concomitant bevacizumab use were significant risk factors for clinically problematic hiccups in patients receiving CDDP-containing treatment along with dexamethasone and NK1 receptor inhibitors for thoracic cancer.
{"title":"Evaluation of factors associated with clinically problematic hiccups in cisplatin-containing treatment with dexamethasone and neurokinin 1 receptor antagonists.","authors":"Yoshitaka Saito, Yoh Takekuma, Jun Sakakibara-Konishi, Yasushi Shimizu, Ichiro Kinoshita, Mitsuru Sugawara","doi":"10.1007/s10147-025-02912-0","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10147-025-02912-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chemotherapy-induced hiccups are one of the frequently appearing adverse events. Previous reports have suggested that cisplatin (CDDP) combined with dexamethasone and neurokinin 1 (NK1) receptor antagonists is particularly associated with these symptoms. Consequently, we aimed to identify additional factors involved in the development of problematic hiccups during the real-world treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with thoracic cancer first receiving CDDP-containing treatment (≥ 75 mg/m<sup>2</sup>) with dexamethasone, palonosetron, and aprepitant were retrospectively assessed (n = 286). The primary endpoint was the evaluation of risk factors for grade ≥ 2 hiccups during the first cycle. Secondary endpoints were the evaluation of factors for all-grade symptoms and the efficacy of rescue medication.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence of grade ≥ 2 hiccups was 32.9%, with all-grade symptoms of 44.8%. Grade 3 severe hiccups were observed in 5.2% of the patients. Most patients (96.8%) received metoclopramide as first-line treatment, and the efficacy of the first medication was confirmed in 59.6% of patients. Multivariate logistic regression analyses identified male sex, baseline hypoalbuminemia, and concomitant bevacizumab as significant risk factors for grade ≥ 2 problematic hiccups (adjusted odds ratio with 95% confidence interval 10.32 [4.38-24.32], P < 0.0001 for males; 2.41 [1.06-5.50], P = 0.04 for hypoalbuminemia; and 3.42 [1.25-9.36], P = 0.02 for concomitant bevacizumab). Moreover, male sex was identified as a singular risk factor for all-grade symptoms (7.94 [4.14-15.22], P < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study revealed that male sex, hypoalbuminemia, and concomitant bevacizumab use were significant risk factors for clinically problematic hiccups in patients receiving CDDP-containing treatment along with dexamethasone and NK1 receptor inhibitors for thoracic cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":13869,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"2504-2511"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145444773","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: An increased risk of infection has been suggested for patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) treated with atezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel based on the IMpassion130 trial.
Methods: This Japanese postmarketing study aimed to compare the incidence of severe infections in patients with TNBC treated with atezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel versus nab-paclitaxel alone. Anonymized patient records regarding medical claims and laboratory tests were extracted from the Japanese Medical Data Vision database. Patients with a drug index date of November 27, 2019,-May 31, 2022, were included in the analysis. Based on the published literature, severe infections were declared when a patient had a confirmed diagnosis of infection, a hospitalization record, infection as the primary reason for hospitalization, and a record of immunological infection tests. In the sensitivity analysis, the definition of severe infections was modified as a combination of confirmed infection diagnosis and intravenous antibacterial drug prescription records.
Results: Overall, 321 and 319 patients were included in the exposure (atezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel) and control (nab-paclitaxel alone) groups, respectively. After adjusting for standardized mortality/morbidity ratio weighting, the baseline characteristics were balanced between the groups. The incidence rate ratio (exposure/control) of severe infections was estimated at 3.29 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.93-13.53) originally and 1.05 (95% CI: 0.56-1.84) in the sensitivity analysis. Additional analyses supported the appropriateness of the revised definition of severe infections.
Conclusions: Overall, our results did not indicate a significant increase in the risk of severe infections with atezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel in daily clinical practice. Further research is required.
{"title":"Risk of severe infections in patients with triple-negative breast cancer treated with atezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel: a real-world, postmarketing database study in Japan.","authors":"Akinori Yuri, Sayuri Nakane, Yuki Miyano, Kana Yamada, Hiroshi Sugano, Erika Nakatsuji, Masahiko Aoki, Ayako Murayama","doi":"10.1007/s10147-025-02904-0","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10147-025-02904-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>An increased risk of infection has been suggested for patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) treated with atezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel based on the IMpassion130 trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This Japanese postmarketing study aimed to compare the incidence of severe infections in patients with TNBC treated with atezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel versus nab-paclitaxel alone. Anonymized patient records regarding medical claims and laboratory tests were extracted from the Japanese Medical Data Vision database. Patients with a drug index date of November 27, 2019,-May 31, 2022, were included in the analysis. Based on the published literature, severe infections were declared when a patient had a confirmed diagnosis of infection, a hospitalization record, infection as the primary reason for hospitalization, and a record of immunological infection tests. In the sensitivity analysis, the definition of severe infections was modified as a combination of confirmed infection diagnosis and intravenous antibacterial drug prescription records.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 321 and 319 patients were included in the exposure (atezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel) and control (nab-paclitaxel alone) groups, respectively. After adjusting for standardized mortality/morbidity ratio weighting, the baseline characteristics were balanced between the groups. The incidence rate ratio (exposure/control) of severe infections was estimated at 3.29 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.93-13.53) originally and 1.05 (95% CI: 0.56-1.84) in the sensitivity analysis. Additional analyses supported the appropriateness of the revised definition of severe infections.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, our results did not indicate a significant increase in the risk of severe infections with atezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel in daily clinical practice. Further research is required.</p>","PeriodicalId":13869,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"2541-2548"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12644192/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145400809","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Hand-foot syndrome (HFS) and hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR) are adverse effects induced by cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents, such as capecitabine, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, and multi-kinase inhibitors. HFS/HFSR can significantly reduce patients' quality of life and impact cancer treatment intensity due to severe pain in the hands and feet. Although several recommendations and guidelines have been published, most focus on European and American populations, with no management guidelines specifically addressing Asian patients. Given that Asian skin types differ from those of Europeans and Americans, treatment recommendations tailored to Asian populations are needed.
Methods: A narrative review of published articles retrieved following a systematic search of PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Medical Online, and Ichushi-Web between January 2000 and March 2025 was conducted. The search strategy targeted clinical trials using keywords related to HFS, palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia, HFSR, prevention, therapy, and relevant anticancer agents. The review adhered to the PRISMA 2020 guidelines; However, formal quality assessment tools such as GRADE or the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool were not applied.
Results: In total, 53 articles were included in this review, which found different recommendations from European countries due to the differences in skin type. Among the recommended treatments was topical diclofenac, suggested as a potential and novel prevention strategy for capecitabine-induced HFS. However, high potent topical steroids, such as lidocaine patches, or antiseptic solutions, were not recommended.
Conclusions: This review provides evidence-based recommendations for the prevention and treatment of HFS/HFSR in Asian patients, taking into account their unique skin characteristics.
{"title":"Chemotherapy-related hand-foot syndrome and hand-foot skin reaction: a review of management and possible approaches for Asian patients by the Japanese pharmacist-led oncodermatology study team.","authors":"Yohei Iimura, Hirotoshi Iihara, Yoshitaka Saito, Hisanaga Nomura, Takuya Iwamoto, Mayumi Kotera, Yusuke Tsuchiya, Tatsuya Sumiya, Mariko Kono, Daisuke Hirate, Tomohiro Kurokawa, Toshinobu Hayashi, Hironobu Hashimoto, Junichi Higuchi, Ryuta Urakawa, Hiroyuki Saotome, Seiichiro Kuroda","doi":"10.1007/s10147-025-02895-y","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10147-025-02895-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hand-foot syndrome (HFS) and hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR) are adverse effects induced by cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents, such as capecitabine, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, and multi-kinase inhibitors. HFS/HFSR can significantly reduce patients' quality of life and impact cancer treatment intensity due to severe pain in the hands and feet. Although several recommendations and guidelines have been published, most focus on European and American populations, with no management guidelines specifically addressing Asian patients. Given that Asian skin types differ from those of Europeans and Americans, treatment recommendations tailored to Asian populations are needed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A narrative review of published articles retrieved following a systematic search of PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Medical Online, and Ichushi-Web between January 2000 and March 2025 was conducted. The search strategy targeted clinical trials using keywords related to HFS, palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia, HFSR, prevention, therapy, and relevant anticancer agents. The review adhered to the PRISMA 2020 guidelines; However, formal quality assessment tools such as GRADE or the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool were not applied.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 53 articles were included in this review, which found different recommendations from European countries due to the differences in skin type. Among the recommended treatments was topical diclofenac, suggested as a potential and novel prevention strategy for capecitabine-induced HFS. However, high potent topical steroids, such as lidocaine patches, or antiseptic solutions, were not recommended.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review provides evidence-based recommendations for the prevention and treatment of HFS/HFSR in Asian patients, taking into account their unique skin characteristics.</p>","PeriodicalId":13869,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"2474-2488"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12644181/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145238378","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Remote robotic-assisted surgery (RRAS), a form of telesurgery, offers a potential solution to Japan's surgeon shortage and regional disparities in care. Despite advances in robotic systems and modern communication technologies, including both 5G wireless and wired networks, clinical adoption remains limited due to regulatory, infrastructural, and institutional barriers. This review consolidates five years (2020-2025) of technical and operational validation of the hinotori™ Surgical Robot System-a domestically developed platform-in alignment with the 2022 Japanese Remote Surgery Guidelines. Based on over 30 remote-session evaluations by Kobe University, Medicaroid, and NTT DOCOMO, we summarize system performance across key domains: communication latency, QoS-based prioritization, VPN redundancy, fail-safe mechanisms, electromagnetic compatibility, human-system interaction, and legal compliance. Under optimized Sub6 5G SA conditions, the system consistently achieved a round-trip latency of approximately 100 ms and stable stereoscopic video transmission, even during simulated 1 Gbps congestion. Safety was ensured through automatic standby, dual-cockpit fallback, and real-time monitoring. Although hinotori™ meets technical and safety criteria, full-scale implementation remains constrained by legal requirements-particularly the mandate for an on-site physician under Article 20 of the Medical Practitioners Act. Supervised telesurgery, where remote surgeons assist on-site teams, is legally permissible and may serve as a transitional model. This review integrates technical findings with policy considerations, proposing a path toward safe, equitable, and sustainable RRAS deployment in Japan. To our knowledge, this is the first comprehensive review aligning domestic telesurgical validation with national policy benchmarks, offering a foundation for future regulation, accreditation, and digital surgical integration.
{"title":"Toward safe clinical deployment of remote robotic surgery in Japan: five-year validation of the hinotori™ system using 5G wireless communication.","authors":"Takuto Hara, Yoshifumi Morihiro, Yuki Horise, Shuhei Komatsu, Masanao Ohashi, Hiroaki Kitatsuji, Akihisa Yao, Yoshihiro Muragaki, Hideaki Miyake","doi":"10.1007/s10147-025-02874-3","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10147-025-02874-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Remote robotic-assisted surgery (RRAS), a form of telesurgery, offers a potential solution to Japan's surgeon shortage and regional disparities in care. Despite advances in robotic systems and modern communication technologies, including both 5G wireless and wired networks, clinical adoption remains limited due to regulatory, infrastructural, and institutional barriers. This review consolidates five years (2020-2025) of technical and operational validation of the hinotori™ Surgical Robot System-a domestically developed platform-in alignment with the 2022 Japanese Remote Surgery Guidelines. Based on over 30 remote-session evaluations by Kobe University, Medicaroid, and NTT DOCOMO, we summarize system performance across key domains: communication latency, QoS-based prioritization, VPN redundancy, fail-safe mechanisms, electromagnetic compatibility, human-system interaction, and legal compliance. Under optimized Sub6 5G SA conditions, the system consistently achieved a round-trip latency of approximately 100 ms and stable stereoscopic video transmission, even during simulated 1 Gbps congestion. Safety was ensured through automatic standby, dual-cockpit fallback, and real-time monitoring. Although hinotori™ meets technical and safety criteria, full-scale implementation remains constrained by legal requirements-particularly the mandate for an on-site physician under Article 20 of the Medical Practitioners Act. Supervised telesurgery, where remote surgeons assist on-site teams, is legally permissible and may serve as a transitional model. This review integrates technical findings with policy considerations, proposing a path toward safe, equitable, and sustainable RRAS deployment in Japan. To our knowledge, this is the first comprehensive review aligning domestic telesurgical validation with national policy benchmarks, offering a foundation for future regulation, accreditation, and digital surgical integration.</p>","PeriodicalId":13869,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"2389-2398"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12644112/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145400869","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: The survival benefit of combining chemotherapy (chemo) with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in older patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains unclear. We evaluated the lung immune prognostic index (LIPI) as a predictive biomarker in this NEJ057 secondary analysis.
Methods: This analysis included 600 patients aged ≥ 75 years with NSCLC and a programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score (TPS) ≥ 1% enrolled in the NEJ057 study. LIPI was categorized as good, intermediate, or poor based on derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and lactate dehydrogenase levels. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models. Subgroup analyses focused on patients with a PD-L1 TPS of 1-49% and intermediate/poor LIPI to evaluate predictive factors for ICI-chemo benefit.
Results: The survival outcomes of ICI-chemo and ICI-alone varied across different patient characteristics, with LIPI identified as a predictive biomarker. Among patients with a PD-L1 TPS of 1-49% and intermediate/poor LIPI scores, ICI-chemo was associated with significantly longer OS (median: 18.3 months [95% confidence interval {CI} 10.7-26.7] vs. 8.6 months [95% CI 4.5-12.4], p = 0.007; hazard ratio [HR]: 0.56 [95% CI 0.36-0.86]) and PFS (median: 7.8 months [95% CI 6.2-9.7] vs. 3.3 months [95% CI 1.5-5.0], p = 0.002; HR: 0.56 [95% CI 0.39-0.81]) compared with ICI-alone. No significant survival benefit was observed in patients with a PD-L1 TPS of ≥ 50% or good LIPI scores.
Conclusions: LIPI is a useful biomarker for guiding treatment decisions in older patients with NSCLC and a PD-L1 TPS of 1-49%, particularly those with intermediate/poor LIPI scores. Its application might facilitate establishing more personalized strategies and improve outcomes.
背景:化疗(chemo)联合免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)治疗老年晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的生存获益尚不清楚。在NEJ057的二级分析中,我们评估了肺免疫预后指数(LIPI)作为预测性生物标志物。方法:本分析纳入600例年龄≥75岁且程序性死亡-配体1 (PD-L1)肿瘤比例评分(TPS)≥1%的非小细胞肺癌患者,纳入NEJ057研究。根据衍生中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞的比例和乳酸脱氢酶水平,LIPI被分为良好、中等或较差。采用Kaplan-Meier分析和多变量Cox比例风险模型评估总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)。亚组分析的重点是PD-L1 TPS为1-49%、LIPI为中/差的患者,以评估ici化疗获益的预测因素。结果:ici -化疗和ici -单独治疗的生存结果因不同患者特征而异,LIPI被确定为预测性生物标志物。在PD-L1 TPS为1-49%和LIPI评分中/差的患者中,与单独使用ici相比,CI-化疗与更长的OS(中位数:18.3个月[95%可信区间{CI} 10.7-26.7]比8.6个月[95% CI 4.5-12.4], p = 0.007;风险比[HR]: 0.56 [95% CI 0.36-0.86])和PFS(中位数:7.8个月[95% CI 6.2-9.7]比3.3个月[95% CI 1.5-5.0], p = 0.002; HR: 0.56 [95% CI 0.39-0.81])相关。PD-L1 TPS≥50%或LIPI评分良好的患者未观察到显著的生存获益。结论:LIPI是指导老年非小细胞肺癌患者治疗决策的有用生物标志物,PD-L1 TPS为1-49%,特别是那些LIPI评分为中等/较差的患者。它的应用可能有助于建立更个性化的策略并改善结果。
{"title":"Lung immune prognostic index as a biomarker for predicting the benefit of immune checkpoint inhibitor plus chemotherapy in older patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a secondary analysis of the NEJ057 study.","authors":"Takehiro Tozuka, Yoko Tsukita, Kohei Kushiro, Shinobu Hosokawa, Hitomi Nogawa, Satoshi Arai, Sayo Soda, Daisuke Arai, Kei Takamura, Ryoichi Honda, Kosuke Hamai, Yukiko Namba, Yasutaka Kawai, Takashi Kikuchi, Kensuke Nakazawa, Takayuki Honda, Noriyuki Ebi, Yutaka Yamada, Tomonori Makiguchi, Masahiro Seike, Satoshi Morita, Kunihiko Kobayashi, Hajime Asahina","doi":"10.1007/s10147-025-02911-1","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10147-025-02911-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The survival benefit of combining chemotherapy (chemo) with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in older patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains unclear. We evaluated the lung immune prognostic index (LIPI) as a predictive biomarker in this NEJ057 secondary analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This analysis included 600 patients aged ≥ 75 years with NSCLC and a programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score (TPS) ≥ 1% enrolled in the NEJ057 study. LIPI was categorized as good, intermediate, or poor based on derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and lactate dehydrogenase levels. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models. Subgroup analyses focused on patients with a PD-L1 TPS of 1-49% and intermediate/poor LIPI to evaluate predictive factors for ICI-chemo benefit.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survival outcomes of ICI-chemo and ICI-alone varied across different patient characteristics, with LIPI identified as a predictive biomarker. Among patients with a PD-L1 TPS of 1-49% and intermediate/poor LIPI scores, ICI-chemo was associated with significantly longer OS (median: 18.3 months [95% confidence interval {CI} 10.7-26.7] vs. 8.6 months [95% CI 4.5-12.4], p = 0.007; hazard ratio [HR]: 0.56 [95% CI 0.36-0.86]) and PFS (median: 7.8 months [95% CI 6.2-9.7] vs. 3.3 months [95% CI 1.5-5.0], p = 0.002; HR: 0.56 [95% CI 0.39-0.81]) compared with ICI-alone. No significant survival benefit was observed in patients with a PD-L1 TPS of ≥ 50% or good LIPI scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LIPI is a useful biomarker for guiding treatment decisions in older patients with NSCLC and a PD-L1 TPS of 1-49%, particularly those with intermediate/poor LIPI scores. Its application might facilitate establishing more personalized strategies and improve outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":13869,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"2523-2531"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145444709","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-09-27DOI: 10.1007/s10147-025-02890-3
Rizwan Qaisar, Shah Hussain, Firdos Ahmad, Asima Karim
Background: Cisplatin-based chemotherapy and radical cystectomy are standard treatments for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), but their impact on neuromuscular integrity and functional capacity remains elusive. We investigated plasma biomarkers of neuromuscular junction degradation (c-terminal agrin-fragment-22; CAF22) and neuronal injury (Neurofilament light-chain; NfL) in relation to physical capacity in MIBC patients.
Methods: In this prospective study, 42 MIBC patients undergoing neoadjuvant cisplatin-gemcitabine chemotherapy and radical cystectomy were assessed before (T1) and after (T2) chemotherapy, and 4-6 weeks post-surgery (T3). Age- and BMI-matched controls (n = 46) were evaluated once. Plasma CAF22 and NfL were measured alongside handgrip strength (HGS), gait speed (GS), appendicular skeletal muscle index (ASMI), and short physical performance battery (SPPB).
Results: Plasma CAF22 and NfL were significantly elevated in patients versus controls at all time points. NfL showed more modest increases in post-treatment. HGS declined from 22.3 ± 3.9 kg at T1 to 17.2 ± 3.3 kg at T3 (p < 0.05), along with reductions in ASMI and GS. Cumulative SPPB scores dropped from 9.02 ± 1.02 to 8.24 ± 1.32. Sarcopenia prevalence rose from 28.5% at T1 to 52.4% at T3. CAF22 was significantly associated with lower HGS and SPPB at T1 (β = - 0.58 and - 0.42, p < 0.001). CAF22 changes correlated with HGS (r = - 0.80) and SPPB (r = - 0.75), while NfL showed weaker but significant correlations. Lab results indicated declines in hemoglobin, albumin, and renal function markers consistent with treatment effects.
Conclusions: CAF22 showed strong associations with treatment-related decline in skeletal muscle, suggesting its potential as an early biomarker of sarcopenia that warrants validation in larger cohorts.
背景:以顺铂为基础的化疗和根治性膀胱切除术是肌肉浸润性膀胱癌(MIBC)的标准治疗方法,但它们对神经肌肉完整性和功能能力的影响尚不明确。我们研究了与MIBC患者身体能力相关的神经肌肉连接处降解(c-末端agrin-fragment-22; CAF22)和神经元损伤(Neurofilament light-chain; NfL)的血浆生物标志物。方法:在这项前瞻性研究中,42例接受顺铂-吉西他滨新辅助化疗和根治性膀胱切除术的MIBC患者在化疗前(T1)、化疗后(T2)和术后4-6周(T3)进行评估。年龄和bmi匹配的对照组(n = 46)评估一次。测定血浆CAF22和NfL,同时测定握力(HGS)、步速(GS)、阑尾骨骼肌指数(ASMI)和短时体能电池(SPPB)。结果:与对照组相比,患者血浆CAF22和NfL在所有时间点均显著升高。NfL在治疗后表现出更温和的增长。HGS从T1时的22.3±3.9 kg下降到T3时的17.2±3.3 kg (p结论:CAF22与治疗相关的骨骼肌下降有很强的相关性,表明它有潜力作为肌肉减少症的早期生物标志物,值得在更大的队列中验证。
{"title":"Plasma CAF22 and NfL reflect neuromuscular decline during cisplatin-based chemotherapy and radical cystectomy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer.","authors":"Rizwan Qaisar, Shah Hussain, Firdos Ahmad, Asima Karim","doi":"10.1007/s10147-025-02890-3","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10147-025-02890-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cisplatin-based chemotherapy and radical cystectomy are standard treatments for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), but their impact on neuromuscular integrity and functional capacity remains elusive. We investigated plasma biomarkers of neuromuscular junction degradation (c-terminal agrin-fragment-22; CAF22) and neuronal injury (Neurofilament light-chain; NfL) in relation to physical capacity in MIBC patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective study, 42 MIBC patients undergoing neoadjuvant cisplatin-gemcitabine chemotherapy and radical cystectomy were assessed before (T1) and after (T2) chemotherapy, and 4-6 weeks post-surgery (T3). Age- and BMI-matched controls (n = 46) were evaluated once. Plasma CAF22 and NfL were measured alongside handgrip strength (HGS), gait speed (GS), appendicular skeletal muscle index (ASMI), and short physical performance battery (SPPB).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Plasma CAF22 and NfL were significantly elevated in patients versus controls at all time points. NfL showed more modest increases in post-treatment. HGS declined from 22.3 ± 3.9 kg at T1 to 17.2 ± 3.3 kg at T3 (p < 0.05), along with reductions in ASMI and GS. Cumulative SPPB scores dropped from 9.02 ± 1.02 to 8.24 ± 1.32. Sarcopenia prevalence rose from 28.5% at T1 to 52.4% at T3. CAF22 was significantly associated with lower HGS and SPPB at T1 (β = - 0.58 and - 0.42, p < 0.001). CAF22 changes correlated with HGS (r = - 0.80) and SPPB (r = - 0.75), while NfL showed weaker but significant correlations. Lab results indicated declines in hemoglobin, albumin, and renal function markers consistent with treatment effects.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CAF22 showed strong associations with treatment-related decline in skeletal muscle, suggesting its potential as an early biomarker of sarcopenia that warrants validation in larger cohorts.</p>","PeriodicalId":13869,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"2626-2634"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145182162","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-10-29DOI: 10.1007/s10147-025-02908-w
Akihiko Chida, Hideyuki Hayashi, Norihito Ishida, Eiichiro So, Shotaro Kishimoto, Sara Horie, Kai Tsugaru, Satoru Matsuda, Hirofumi Kawakubo, Hiroshi Nishihara, Yasuo Hamamoto, Takanori Kanai, Yuko Kitagawa, Kenro Hirata
Background: Precision medicine for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) has not been implemented owing to a lack of site-specific therapeutic markers and biomarkers. We hypothesized that the genomic background of each subsite of the esophagus might be different, allowing us to develop site-specific treatment strategies (cervical, upper thoracic, middle thoracic and lower thoracic).
Methods: This was a single-center retrospective cohort study. Patients diagnosed with ESCC who underwent comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) at Keio University Hospital between April 2017 and March 2024 were recruited. Genomic profiles were analyzed and compared across esophageal subsites.
Results: Among the 107 patients with ESCC who underwent CGP, 6 were cervical, 16 were upper thoracic, 54 were middle thoracic, and 31 were lower thoracic. The most frequently altered genes were TP53, followed by CDKN2A and NFE2L2. The frequency of NFE2L2 mutations was significantly higher in the middle thoracic region (P = 0.041). The mutation rate increased from Stage I to IV (P = 0.0046). NFE2L2 mutations were rarely observed in early-stage cancers, suggesting that they may subsequently be acquired during growth and metastasis. Furthermore, a significant association was observed between a history of heavy alcohol consumption and NFE2L2 mutations. The overall survival of patients with unresectable or metastatic ESCC harboring NFE2L2 mutations was 12.0 months, compared to 29.7 months in patients without the mutations (HR: 2.37, P = 0.047).
Conclusion: NFE2L2 mutations were more common in the middle thoracic esophagus, appeared to be associated with tumor progression, and were linked to poor prognosis.
背景:由于缺乏部位特异性治疗标志物和生物标志物,食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)的精准医学尚未实施。我们假设食道的每个亚位点的基因组背景可能是不同的,这使我们能够制定特定部位的治疗策略(颈椎、上胸椎、中胸椎和下胸椎)。方法:这是一项单中心回顾性队列研究。研究招募了2017年4月至2024年3月期间在庆应义塾大学医院接受全面基因组分析(CGP)的ESCC患者。分析和比较了不同食道亚位点的基因组图谱。结果:107例行CGP的ESCC患者中,6例为颈椎,16例为上胸椎,54例为中胸椎,31例为下胸椎。最常见的改变基因是TP53,其次是CDKN2A和NFE2L2。NFE2L2的突变频率在胸中区明显较高(P = 0.041)。从I期到IV期突变率增加(P = 0.0046)。在早期癌症中很少观察到NFE2L2突变,这表明它们可能随后在生长和转移过程中获得。此外,重度饮酒史与NFE2L2突变之间存在显著关联。携带NFE2L2突变的不可切除或转移性ESCC患者的总生存期为12.0个月,而没有突变的患者的总生存期为29.7个月(HR: 2.37, P = 0.047)。结论:NFE2L2突变在中胸食道中更为常见,似乎与肿瘤进展有关,并与不良预后有关。
{"title":"Site-specific prevalence of the NFE2L2 mutation in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.","authors":"Akihiko Chida, Hideyuki Hayashi, Norihito Ishida, Eiichiro So, Shotaro Kishimoto, Sara Horie, Kai Tsugaru, Satoru Matsuda, Hirofumi Kawakubo, Hiroshi Nishihara, Yasuo Hamamoto, Takanori Kanai, Yuko Kitagawa, Kenro Hirata","doi":"10.1007/s10147-025-02908-w","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10147-025-02908-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Precision medicine for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) has not been implemented owing to a lack of site-specific therapeutic markers and biomarkers. We hypothesized that the genomic background of each subsite of the esophagus might be different, allowing us to develop site-specific treatment strategies (cervical, upper thoracic, middle thoracic and lower thoracic).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-center retrospective cohort study. Patients diagnosed with ESCC who underwent comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) at Keio University Hospital between April 2017 and March 2024 were recruited. Genomic profiles were analyzed and compared across esophageal subsites.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 107 patients with ESCC who underwent CGP, 6 were cervical, 16 were upper thoracic, 54 were middle thoracic, and 31 were lower thoracic. The most frequently altered genes were TP53, followed by CDKN2A and NFE2L2. The frequency of NFE2L2 mutations was significantly higher in the middle thoracic region (P = 0.041). The mutation rate increased from Stage I to IV (P = 0.0046). NFE2L2 mutations were rarely observed in early-stage cancers, suggesting that they may subsequently be acquired during growth and metastasis. Furthermore, a significant association was observed between a history of heavy alcohol consumption and NFE2L2 mutations. The overall survival of patients with unresectable or metastatic ESCC harboring NFE2L2 mutations was 12.0 months, compared to 29.7 months in patients without the mutations (HR: 2.37, P = 0.047).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>NFE2L2 mutations were more common in the middle thoracic esophagus, appeared to be associated with tumor progression, and were linked to poor prognosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":13869,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"2576-2586"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145400825","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Sarcopenia, characterized by loss of skeletal muscle mass and function, is a highly prevalent yet often overlooked condition in patients with gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. Emerging evidence suggests that sarcopenia is a significant predictor of poor prognosis across various stages of GI cancers. Among surgical candidates, preoperative sarcopenia is consistently associated with higher rates of postoperative complications, longer hospital stays, and lower recurrence-free and overall survival rates. Among patients receiving neoadjuvant, adjuvant, or palliative chemotherapy, sarcopenia is associated with increased treatment-related toxicity, reduced adherence to treatment, impaired quality of life, and shorter survival. These findings suggest that sarcopenia is a modifiable risk factor that can critically influence the clinical trajectory of GI cancer patients; i.e., it is not merely a comorbidity. Early detection of sarcopenia through imaging or functional assessment before cancer treatment allows for risk stratification and implementation of targeted interventions such as nutritional optimization and personalized exercise programs. As a primary strategy, the optimal management of sarcopenia in GI cancer patients should combine nutritional and exercise interventions. Pharmacologic therapy, such as anamorelin, may be considered for refractory cachexia accompanied by significant anorexia. Early and sustained multidisciplinary intervention involving collaboration among oncologists, dietitians, physiotherapists, and other specialists is crucial for improving outcomes, enhancing treatment tolerance, and ultimately prolonging survival. This review summarizes the current understanding of sarcopenia in GI cancers, highlights its clinical impact across different treatment settings, and discusses strategies for assessment and integrated management. Addressing sarcopenia is an essential component of personalized cancer care in GI oncology.
{"title":"Sarcopenia in gastrointestinal cancers.","authors":"Tomoya Emori, Masahiro Itonaga, Reiko Ashida, Masayuki Kitano","doi":"10.1007/s10147-025-02915-x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-025-02915-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sarcopenia, characterized by loss of skeletal muscle mass and function, is a highly prevalent yet often overlooked condition in patients with gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. Emerging evidence suggests that sarcopenia is a significant predictor of poor prognosis across various stages of GI cancers. Among surgical candidates, preoperative sarcopenia is consistently associated with higher rates of postoperative complications, longer hospital stays, and lower recurrence-free and overall survival rates. Among patients receiving neoadjuvant, adjuvant, or palliative chemotherapy, sarcopenia is associated with increased treatment-related toxicity, reduced adherence to treatment, impaired quality of life, and shorter survival. These findings suggest that sarcopenia is a modifiable risk factor that can critically influence the clinical trajectory of GI cancer patients; i.e., it is not merely a comorbidity. Early detection of sarcopenia through imaging or functional assessment before cancer treatment allows for risk stratification and implementation of targeted interventions such as nutritional optimization and personalized exercise programs. As a primary strategy, the optimal management of sarcopenia in GI cancer patients should combine nutritional and exercise interventions. Pharmacologic therapy, such as anamorelin, may be considered for refractory cachexia accompanied by significant anorexia. Early and sustained multidisciplinary intervention involving collaboration among oncologists, dietitians, physiotherapists, and other specialists is crucial for improving outcomes, enhancing treatment tolerance, and ultimately prolonging survival. This review summarizes the current understanding of sarcopenia in GI cancers, highlights its clinical impact across different treatment settings, and discusses strategies for assessment and integrated management. Addressing sarcopenia is an essential component of personalized cancer care in GI oncology.</p>","PeriodicalId":13869,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145481961","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}