Although the 5-year relative survival rates for resectable solid tumors have improved over the past few years, the risk of postoperative recurrence necessitates effective monitoring strategies. Recent advancements in molecular residual disease (MRD) testing based on circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis have shown considerable promise in the context of predicting recurrence; however, significant barriers to widespread clinical implementation remain-mainly, low awareness among healthcare professionals, high costs, and lack of standardized assays and comprehensive evidence. This position paper, led by the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology, aims to establish a common framework for the appropriate clinical use of MRD testing in a tumor type-agnostic manner. It synthesizes currently available evidence, reviews region-specific clinical trends, addresses critical clinical questions related to MRD testing, and offers recommendations to guide healthcare professionals, biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies, and regulatory authorities. These recommendations were developed based on a voting process involving 15 expert members, ensuring a consensus-driven approach. These findings underscore the importance of collaborative efforts among various stakeholders in enhancing the clinical utility of MRD testing. This project aimed to foster consensus and provide clear guidelines to support the advancement of precision medicine in oncology and improve patient outcomes in the context of perioperative care.
{"title":"Japan society of clinical oncology position paper on appropriate clinical use of molecular residual disease (MRD) testing.","authors":"Shin Kobayashi, Yoshiaki Nakamura, Tadayoshi Hashimoto, Hideaki Bando, Eiji Oki, Takahiro Karasaki, Hidehito Horinouchi, Yukinori Ozaki, Hiroji Iwata, Taigo Kato, Hideaki Miyake, Akihiro Ohba, Masafumi Ikeda, Tatsuyuki Chiyoda, Kosei Hasegawa, Takao Fujisawa, Kazuto Matsuura, Kenjiro Namikawa, Shugo Yajima, Takayuki Yoshino, Kiyoshi Hasegawa","doi":"10.1007/s10147-024-02683-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-024-02683-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although the 5-year relative survival rates for resectable solid tumors have improved over the past few years, the risk of postoperative recurrence necessitates effective monitoring strategies. Recent advancements in molecular residual disease (MRD) testing based on circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis have shown considerable promise in the context of predicting recurrence; however, significant barriers to widespread clinical implementation remain-mainly, low awareness among healthcare professionals, high costs, and lack of standardized assays and comprehensive evidence. This position paper, led by the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology, aims to establish a common framework for the appropriate clinical use of MRD testing in a tumor type-agnostic manner. It synthesizes currently available evidence, reviews region-specific clinical trends, addresses critical clinical questions related to MRD testing, and offers recommendations to guide healthcare professionals, biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies, and regulatory authorities. These recommendations were developed based on a voting process involving 15 expert members, ensuring a consensus-driven approach. These findings underscore the importance of collaborative efforts among various stakeholders in enhancing the clinical utility of MRD testing. This project aimed to foster consensus and provide clear guidelines to support the advancement of precision medicine in oncology and improve patient outcomes in the context of perioperative care.</p>","PeriodicalId":13869,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143370440","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Immuno-oncology (IO) combination therapies, including IO + IO or IO + vascular endothelial growth factor targeted therapies (VEGF-TT), have become the standard first-line treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, the optimal regimen for patients without prior nephrectomy remains unclear.
Methods: Data from 99 patients with advanced RCC without nephrectomy, treated with VEGF-TT, IO + IO, or IO + VEGF-TT between May 2008 and May 2024, were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed. Patients were divided into VEGE-TT, IO + IO, and IO + VEGF-TT groups based on their first-line treatment, and survival and tumor response were compared.
Results: All patients included in this study were categorized as either intermediate or poor risk according to the International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium risk classification. Among the 99 included patients, 41 initiated first-line therapy with VEGF-TT, 36 with IO + IO, and 22 with IO + VEGF-TT. The objective response rates were 17.5% for VEGF-TT, 38.9% for IO + IO, and 61.9% for IO + VEGF-TT. Notably, the IO + VEGF-TT group showed the greatest shrinkage of target kidney lesions (p = 0.0042). In multivariate analyses, bone metastasis (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.812, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.017-3.228, p = 0.0436) and the first-line regimen (VEGF-TT vs IO + VEGF-TT: HR = 0.129, 95% CI 0.045-0.369, p = 0.0001) were independent prognostic factors for progression-free survival. The first-line regimen (VEGF-TT vs IO + VEGF-TT: HR = 0.303, 95% CI 0.104-0.879, p = 0.0279) independently affected overall survival.
Conclusion: IO combination therapy, especially IO + VEGF-TT, has demonstrated a higher anti-tumor response in patients with advanced RCC without nephrectomy and may also be highly effective against primary renal tumors. Therefore, further studies are needed to improve patient survival and validate efficacy of IO combination therapy.
{"title":"Therapeutic efficacy of immune-oncology combination therapy in advanced renal cell carcinoma without prior nephrectomy.","authors":"Kosuke Ueda, Naoki Ito, Yuya Sakai, Satoshi Ohnishi, Taishi Hirano, Hirofumi Kurose, Katsuaki Chikui, Keiichiro Uemura, Kiyoaki Nishihara, Makoto Nakiri, Shigetaka Suekane, Tsukasa Igawa","doi":"10.1007/s10147-025-02710-8","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10147-025-02710-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Immuno-oncology (IO) combination therapies, including IO + IO or IO + vascular endothelial growth factor targeted therapies (VEGF-TT), have become the standard first-line treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, the optimal regimen for patients without prior nephrectomy remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from 99 patients with advanced RCC without nephrectomy, treated with VEGF-TT, IO + IO, or IO + VEGF-TT between May 2008 and May 2024, were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed. Patients were divided into VEGE-TT, IO + IO, and IO + VEGF-TT groups based on their first-line treatment, and survival and tumor response were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All patients included in this study were categorized as either intermediate or poor risk according to the International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium risk classification. Among the 99 included patients, 41 initiated first-line therapy with VEGF-TT, 36 with IO + IO, and 22 with IO + VEGF-TT. The objective response rates were 17.5% for VEGF-TT, 38.9% for IO + IO, and 61.9% for IO + VEGF-TT. Notably, the IO + VEGF-TT group showed the greatest shrinkage of target kidney lesions (p = 0.0042). In multivariate analyses, bone metastasis (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.812, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.017-3.228, p = 0.0436) and the first-line regimen (VEGF-TT vs IO + VEGF-TT: HR = 0.129, 95% CI 0.045-0.369, p = 0.0001) were independent prognostic factors for progression-free survival. The first-line regimen (VEGF-TT vs IO + VEGF-TT: HR = 0.303, 95% CI 0.104-0.879, p = 0.0279) independently affected overall survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>IO combination therapy, especially IO + VEGF-TT, has demonstrated a higher anti-tumor response in patients with advanced RCC without nephrectomy and may also be highly effective against primary renal tumors. Therefore, further studies are needed to improve patient survival and validate efficacy of IO combination therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":13869,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143079775","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Financial toxicity impacts the treatment choices, daily life, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of cancer patients. We investigated future variations in financial toxicity and HRQoL of patients with gynecologic cancer, evaluated using the COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity (COST) questionnaire.
Methods: This multicenter study enrolled patients with gynecologic cancer incurring co-payments for anti-cancer drug treatment for over 2 months. Questionnaires were administered at baseline and at the end of follow-up. Patients completed the COST, EORTC-QLQ-C30, EORTC-QLQ-OV28, EORTC-QLQ-CX24, EORTC-QLQ-EN24, and EQ-5D-5L. Paired t-tests were used to compare the initial and follow-up responses. Spearman's rank test was used to examine correlations between COST and HRQoL scores.
Results: Ninety-one patients (ovarian, 40; cervical, 18; endometrial, 33) completed the questionnaires at baseline and follow-up. The mean COST score was not significantly different between baseline and end of follow-up (19.56 ± 6.63 and 19.97 ± 7.47, respectively; p = 0.439). Significant correlations were found between COST scores and emotional functioning (r = 0.251, p = 0.023), cognitive functioning (r = 0.254, p = 0.020), and financial difficulties (r = - 0.298, p = 0.006), attitude toward disease/treatment (r = 0.356, p = 0.033), poor body image (r = - 0.362, p = 0.042), back and pelvis pain (r = - 0.451, p = 0.010), and taste change (r = - 0.359, p = 0.040).
Conclusions: During anticancer drug therapy for gynecologic cancer, the COST score remained stable and did not correlate with overall HRQoL, although higher scores were associated with worse HRQoL for specific functions and symptoms.
背景:财务毒性影响癌症患者的治疗选择、日常生活和健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)。我们研究了妇科癌症患者财务毒性和HRQoL的未来变化,使用财务毒性综合评分(COST)问卷进行评估。方法:本多中心研究纳入了自费抗癌药物治疗2个月以上的妇科癌症患者。在基线和随访结束时进行问卷调查。患者完成了COST、EORTC-QLQ-C30、EORTC-QLQ-OV28、EORTC-QLQ-CX24、EORTC-QLQ-EN24和EQ-5D-5L。配对t检验用于比较初始和随访反应。采用Spearman等级检验检验COST与HRQoL评分之间的相关性。结果:91例患者(卵巢40例;颈,18;子宫内膜,33)完成基线和随访问卷。平均COST评分在基线和随访结束时差异无统计学意义(分别为19.56±6.63和19.97±7.47);p = 0.439)。成本评分与情绪功能(r = 0.251, p = 0.023)、认知功能(r = 0.254, p = 0.020)、经济困难(r = - 0.298, p = 0.006)、对疾病/治疗的态度(r = 0.356, p = 0.033)、身体形象不佳(r = - 0.362, p = 0.042)、背部和骨盆疼痛(r = - 0.451, p = 0.010)、味觉变化(r = - 0.359, p = 0.040)之间存在显著相关性。结论:在妇科肿瘤抗癌药物治疗期间,COST评分保持稳定,与总体HRQoL无相关性,但较高的评分与特定功能和症状的HRQoL较差相关。
{"title":"Prospective changes in financial toxicity and health-related quality of life in patients with gynecologic cancer.","authors":"Kazunori Honda, Yusuke Kajimoto, Shiro Suzuki, Masahiko Mori, Kohshiro Nakao, Anri Azuma, Takashi Shibutani, Shoji Nagao, Takahiro Koyanagi, Izumi Kohara, Shuko Tamaki, Midori Yabuki, Lida Teng, Ataru Igarashi","doi":"10.1007/s10147-024-02668-z","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10147-024-02668-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Financial toxicity impacts the treatment choices, daily life, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of cancer patients. We investigated future variations in financial toxicity and HRQoL of patients with gynecologic cancer, evaluated using the COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity (COST) questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter study enrolled patients with gynecologic cancer incurring co-payments for anti-cancer drug treatment for over 2 months. Questionnaires were administered at baseline and at the end of follow-up. Patients completed the COST, EORTC-QLQ-C30, EORTC-QLQ-OV28, EORTC-QLQ-CX24, EORTC-QLQ-EN24, and EQ-5D-5L. Paired t-tests were used to compare the initial and follow-up responses. Spearman's rank test was used to examine correlations between COST and HRQoL scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-one patients (ovarian, 40; cervical, 18; endometrial, 33) completed the questionnaires at baseline and follow-up. The mean COST score was not significantly different between baseline and end of follow-up (19.56 ± 6.63 and 19.97 ± 7.47, respectively; p = 0.439). Significant correlations were found between COST scores and emotional functioning (r = 0.251, p = 0.023), cognitive functioning (r = 0.254, p = 0.020), and financial difficulties (r = - 0.298, p = 0.006), attitude toward disease/treatment (r = 0.356, p = 0.033), poor body image (r = - 0.362, p = 0.042), back and pelvis pain (r = - 0.451, p = 0.010), and taste change (r = - 0.359, p = 0.040).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>During anticancer drug therapy for gynecologic cancer, the COST score remained stable and did not correlate with overall HRQoL, although higher scores were associated with worse HRQoL for specific functions and symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":13869,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"380-388"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142768178","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: The standard for robotic para-aortic lymphadenectomy has not been fully established. Para-aortic lymphadenectomy performed by sharing the same ports with pelvic procedures, a procedure known as dual-docking surgery, can be performed using the latest robotic system. We prospectively examined the ability of standardized dual-docking robotic surgery in endometrial cancer patients.
Methods: This study prospectively verified the feasibility and safety of dual-docking robotic surgeries performed between March 2017 and December 2021. The laterally placed ports were aligned with the umbilicus. Primary outcome was the surgical completion rate; secondary outcomes were blood loss, operative time, unexpected port placement, conversion, complications, length of hospital stay, and survival.
Results: Most patients (14/15, 93%) underwent surgery using our methods without additional port placements, and one patient was converted to laparotomy. Median blood loss was 162 mL (range: 20-685 mL). Median operative time was 183 and 206 min in the upper and lower abdomen. Median number of resected para-aortic lymph nodes was 19 (range: 6-29), and pelvic lymph nodes was 28 (range: 15-42). Although there was no difficulty in moving the forceps intraoperatively, major complications including vessel injury, and pelvic abscesses were observed. The lateral ports could be placed 6-10 cm apart in patients with any range of body type.
Conclusion: Dual-docking surgery for endometrial cancer has the potential to be a standard procedure for robotic endometrial cancer surgery, although a greater number of cases are needed to acquire proficiency.
{"title":"Robotic dual-docking surgery for para-aortic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer: a prospective feasibility study.","authors":"Shintaro Yanazume, Hiroaki Kobayashi, Takashi Ushiwaka, Shinichi Togami, Masaki Kamio","doi":"10.1007/s10147-024-02635-8","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10147-024-02635-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The standard for robotic para-aortic lymphadenectomy has not been fully established. Para-aortic lymphadenectomy performed by sharing the same ports with pelvic procedures, a procedure known as dual-docking surgery, can be performed using the latest robotic system. We prospectively examined the ability of standardized dual-docking robotic surgery in endometrial cancer patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study prospectively verified the feasibility and safety of dual-docking robotic surgeries performed between March 2017 and December 2021. The laterally placed ports were aligned with the umbilicus. Primary outcome was the surgical completion rate; secondary outcomes were blood loss, operative time, unexpected port placement, conversion, complications, length of hospital stay, and survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most patients (14/15, 93%) underwent surgery using our methods without additional port placements, and one patient was converted to laparotomy. Median blood loss was 162 mL (range: 20-685 mL). Median operative time was 183 and 206 min in the upper and lower abdomen. Median number of resected para-aortic lymph nodes was 19 (range: 6-29), and pelvic lymph nodes was 28 (range: 15-42). Although there was no difficulty in moving the forceps intraoperatively, major complications including vessel injury, and pelvic abscesses were observed. The lateral ports could be placed 6-10 cm apart in patients with any range of body type.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dual-docking surgery for endometrial cancer has the potential to be a standard procedure for robotic endometrial cancer surgery, although a greater number of cases are needed to acquire proficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":13869,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"358-370"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11785595/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142872081","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01DOI: 10.1007/s10147-024-02679-w
Noriomi Matsumura, Masaki Mandai
{"title":"PMDA regulatory update on approval and revision of the precautions for use of anticancer drugs; approval of pembrolizumab for locally advanced uterine cervical cancer, and durvalumab and olaparib for advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer in Japan.","authors":"Noriomi Matsumura, Masaki Mandai","doi":"10.1007/s10147-024-02679-w","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10147-024-02679-w","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":13869,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"170-171"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142893693","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSIs) combined with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for treating castration-sensitive metastatic prostate cancer in Japanese patients, focusing on the effects on time to the development of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) and overall survival (OS).
Methods: This retrospective muti-institutional analysis included 332 patients diagnosed with metastatic prostate cancer in Japan between 2018 and 2023. The patients were categorized into two groups: patients receiving ADT combined with ARSI (ARSI group) and those receiving ADT alone or with bicalutamide (ADT group). Data on demographics, treatments, and outcomes were compared using the Kaplan-Meier method with propensity score matching.
Results: We found an increasing trend in ARSI use over time. The median time to CRPC was significantly longer in the ARSI group than in the ADT group (47.1 vs. 15.2 months, p < 0.001); however, no significant differences in OS were observed before or after propensity score matching. The 1-year-survival rate of patients in the ARSI group tended to be higher than that of patients in the ADT group in subgroups with high tumor volume (96.1% vs. 85.0%) and high Gleason grade (98.1% vs. 85.9%).
Conclusions: Adding ARSI to ADT extended the time to CRPC but did not significantly affect OS. However, it potentially suppressed the short-term risk of death in high-risk subgroups. This study highlights the need for further research to explore the characteristics of Japanese patients with metastatic prostate cancer in whom upfront ARSIs are effective.
{"title":"Efficacy of androgen receptor signaling inhibitors in combination with androgen deprivation therapy for castration-sensitive metastatic prostate cancer: a retrospective analysis in a Japanese cohort.","authors":"Minekatsu Taga, Takeshi Sasaki, Shinichiro Higashi, Shoichi Kimura, Atsuro Sawada, Katsuki Tsuchiyama, Takahiro Inoue, Toshiyuki Kamoto, Naoki Terada","doi":"10.1007/s10147-024-02670-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10147-024-02670-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSIs) combined with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for treating castration-sensitive metastatic prostate cancer in Japanese patients, focusing on the effects on time to the development of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) and overall survival (OS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective muti-institutional analysis included 332 patients diagnosed with metastatic prostate cancer in Japan between 2018 and 2023. The patients were categorized into two groups: patients receiving ADT combined with ARSI (ARSI group) and those receiving ADT alone or with bicalutamide (ADT group). Data on demographics, treatments, and outcomes were compared using the Kaplan-Meier method with propensity score matching.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found an increasing trend in ARSI use over time. The median time to CRPC was significantly longer in the ARSI group than in the ADT group (47.1 vs. 15.2 months, p < 0.001); however, no significant differences in OS were observed before or after propensity score matching. The 1-year-survival rate of patients in the ARSI group tended to be higher than that of patients in the ADT group in subgroups with high tumor volume (96.1% vs. 85.0%) and high Gleason grade (98.1% vs. 85.9%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adding ARSI to ADT extended the time to CRPC but did not significantly affect OS. However, it potentially suppressed the short-term risk of death in high-risk subgroups. This study highlights the need for further research to explore the characteristics of Japanese patients with metastatic prostate cancer in whom upfront ARSIs are effective.</p>","PeriodicalId":13869,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"351-357"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11785660/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142846566","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2024-12-18DOI: 10.1007/s10147-024-02671-4
Tomohiro Miyoshi, Masahiro Tsuboi
The efficacy of molecularly targeted agents has been established in advanced lung cancer, and their indications have recently expanded to include perioperative treatment of resectable lung cancer. For epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive patients, postoperative adjuvant therapy with EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) is available in Japan following the results of the ADAURA trial. In addition to EGFR-TKIs, postoperative adjuvant therapy with TKIs targeting anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) and rearranged during transfection (RET) is expected to be established. On the other hand, because adjuvant chemotherapy is ineffective in patients who have been completely cured of cancer through surgery alone, the balance between efficacy and adverse effects must be considered, and further studies will be needed to determine the necessary and sufficient dosage and the appropriate duration of administration. In addition, the cost of adjuvant chemotherapy has recently become an issue that cannot be overlooked. Therefore, it will be imperative to develop biomarkers to effectively narrow down the patients who benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy.
{"title":"Postoperative adjuvant therapy with molecularly targeted agents for non-small cell lung cancer.","authors":"Tomohiro Miyoshi, Masahiro Tsuboi","doi":"10.1007/s10147-024-02671-4","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10147-024-02671-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The efficacy of molecularly targeted agents has been established in advanced lung cancer, and their indications have recently expanded to include perioperative treatment of resectable lung cancer. For epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive patients, postoperative adjuvant therapy with EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) is available in Japan following the results of the ADAURA trial. In addition to EGFR-TKIs, postoperative adjuvant therapy with TKIs targeting anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) and rearranged during transfection (RET) is expected to be established. On the other hand, because adjuvant chemotherapy is ineffective in patients who have been completely cured of cancer through surgery alone, the balance between efficacy and adverse effects must be considered, and further studies will be needed to determine the necessary and sufficient dosage and the appropriate duration of administration. In addition, the cost of adjuvant chemotherapy has recently become an issue that cannot be overlooked. Therefore, it will be imperative to develop biomarkers to effectively narrow down the patients who benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":13869,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"210-214"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142846567","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2024-11-27DOI: 10.1007/s10147-024-02664-3
Wenjie Jiang, Fan Zhang, Zhen Tang, Shuonan Xu, Yukun Zhang, Lina Liu, Daixing Zhong, Yingxiang Liu
Background: Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) causes leading death worldwide. Mitophagy and lactate metabolism accumulation are distinctive features of LUAD. We aimed to identify lactate-related genes (LRGs) signatures based on mitophagy for predicting prognosis and immune response in LUAD.
Methods: The gene expression and clinical data were downloaded from TCGA and GEO database. First, the subtype analysis was analyzed based on 29 mitophagy genes. Survival, immune, and function differences between the different subtypes were analyzed. Then, based on mitophagy genes and 14 LRGs, the best LRGs were screened to construct a risk score model and combined with clinical factors to establish a nomogram for predicting patient survival. Finally, the expression level and molecular function of the key candidate gene OGDH were verified by in vitro experiments.
Results: All the LUAD samples were divided into 2 subtypes: sub1 and sub2. The sub2 possessed worse survival. Immune score, immune checkpoint genes, and human leucocyte antigen genes in sub1 were higher than in sub2. Six optimal mitophagy-related LRGs were used to construct a risk score model. A high-risk score indicates poorer survival, higher tumor mutation burden, and higher drug sensitivity. The nomogram was robust in predicting LUAD survival. The experiments in vitro showed that knockdown of OGDH inhibited the proliferation, migration and invasion in LUAD cells.
Conclusions: A nomogram based on the construction of the mitophagy-related lactate genes predicts prognosis and immune response in LUAD. These results could help with risk stratification and targeted therapy for LUAD.
{"title":"Prediction of prognosis and immune response in lung adenocarcinoma based on mitophagy and lactate-related gene signatures.","authors":"Wenjie Jiang, Fan Zhang, Zhen Tang, Shuonan Xu, Yukun Zhang, Lina Liu, Daixing Zhong, Yingxiang Liu","doi":"10.1007/s10147-024-02664-3","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10147-024-02664-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) causes leading death worldwide. Mitophagy and lactate metabolism accumulation are distinctive features of LUAD. We aimed to identify lactate-related genes (LRGs) signatures based on mitophagy for predicting prognosis and immune response in LUAD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The gene expression and clinical data were downloaded from TCGA and GEO database. First, the subtype analysis was analyzed based on 29 mitophagy genes. Survival, immune, and function differences between the different subtypes were analyzed. Then, based on mitophagy genes and 14 LRGs, the best LRGs were screened to construct a risk score model and combined with clinical factors to establish a nomogram for predicting patient survival. Finally, the expression level and molecular function of the key candidate gene OGDH were verified by in vitro experiments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All the LUAD samples were divided into 2 subtypes: sub1 and sub2. The sub2 possessed worse survival. Immune score, immune checkpoint genes, and human leucocyte antigen genes in sub1 were higher than in sub2. Six optimal mitophagy-related LRGs were used to construct a risk score model. A high-risk score indicates poorer survival, higher tumor mutation burden, and higher drug sensitivity. The nomogram was robust in predicting LUAD survival. The experiments in vitro showed that knockdown of OGDH inhibited the proliferation, migration and invasion in LUAD cells.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A nomogram based on the construction of the mitophagy-related lactate genes predicts prognosis and immune response in LUAD. These results could help with risk stratification and targeted therapy for LUAD.</p>","PeriodicalId":13869,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"277-297"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142728159","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: For prostate cancer (PCa) in the elderly, including patients ≥ 80 years, the safety of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is controversial. We aimed to evaluate the effect of aging on the postoperative complication rates after RARP.
Methods: This cohort study used a database of patients who had undergone RARP at 25 different institutes. We divided the cohort into four age groups (< 70, 70-74, 75-79, and ≥ 80 years). The complication rates after RARP in the 70-74, 75-79, and ≥ 80 year group were compared using the < 70 year group serving as the control group by applying the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW)-adjusted regression analysis.
Results: A total of 8055 patients were evaluated. The postoperative complication rates were 8.8%, 9.7%, 9.6%, and 10.0% in the < 70, 71-74, 75-79, and ≥ 80 age groups, respectively. In IPTW-adjusted analyses, the risk of overall complications (< 70 vs. 70-74 year group: OR = 1.09 [95% CI 0.92-1.29]; < 70 vs. 75-79 year group: OR = 1.09 [95% CI 0.88-1.37], and < 70 vs. ≥ 80 year group: OR = 2.21 [95% CI 0.92-5.32]) did not change with increasing age. There was no significant increase in risk for any complication category, such as bowel dysfunction, symptomatic lymphocele, or bacterial infection, between the < 70 and ≥ 80 age groups.
Conclusion: Our findings showed that, in appropriately selected patients, the risk of complications after RARP did not increase with age, even at 75 or 80 years.
{"title":"Effects of aging on complications following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.","authors":"Shigeki Koterazawa, Masashi Kubota, Takayuki Sumiyoshi, Ryoichi Saito, Naoto Takaoka, Yuto Hattori, Yosuke Shimizu, Toru Kanno, Takeshi Soda, Yoshiyuki Okada, Kazunari Tsuchihashi, Yuya Sekine, Hiromitsu Negoro, Ryoma Kurahashi, Kimihiro Shimatani, Atsuro Sawada, Shusuke Akamatsu, Takayuki Goto, Takashi Kobayashi","doi":"10.1007/s10147-024-02660-7","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10147-024-02660-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>For prostate cancer (PCa) in the elderly, including patients ≥ 80 years, the safety of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is controversial. We aimed to evaluate the effect of aging on the postoperative complication rates after RARP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cohort study used a database of patients who had undergone RARP at 25 different institutes. We divided the cohort into four age groups (< 70, 70-74, 75-79, and ≥ 80 years). The complication rates after RARP in the 70-74, 75-79, and ≥ 80 year group were compared using the < 70 year group serving as the control group by applying the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW)-adjusted regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 8055 patients were evaluated. The postoperative complication rates were 8.8%, 9.7%, 9.6%, and 10.0% in the < 70, 71-74, 75-79, and ≥ 80 age groups, respectively. In IPTW-adjusted analyses, the risk of overall complications (< 70 vs. 70-74 year group: OR = 1.09 [95% CI 0.92-1.29]; < 70 vs. 75-79 year group: OR = 1.09 [95% CI 0.88-1.37], and < 70 vs. ≥ 80 year group: OR = 2.21 [95% CI 0.92-5.32]) did not change with increasing age. There was no significant increase in risk for any complication category, such as bowel dysfunction, symptomatic lymphocele, or bacterial infection, between the < 70 and ≥ 80 age groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings showed that, in appropriately selected patients, the risk of complications after RARP did not increase with age, even at 75 or 80 years.</p>","PeriodicalId":13869,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"340-350"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142768684","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
In Japan, high-quality cancer statistics are collected through cancer registries. However, these data are rarely summarized or reported in research articles. We compiled statistical data on lung cancer in Japan including the COVID-19 pandemic. In 2019, the number of cases of lung cancer in Japan was 126,548. The age-adjusted incidence rate of lung cancer increased from 23.2/100,000 to 42.4/100,000 in males and from 7.2/100,000 to 18.3/100,000 in females between 1975 and 2019. The age-adjusted mortality rate of lung cancer in Japan increased since 2000, after which it decreased. This trend was similar in both males and females. We also investigated statistics on lung cancer worldwide (Australia, Sweden, England, and the United States [USA]). The age-adjusted incidence rate of lung cancer in the data standardized to the world population for males has increased only in Japan; for females, it has decreased only in the USA. Global age-adjusted lung cancer mortality rates have been declining in all countries. In addition, the COVID-19 pandemic has not affected the age-adjusted mortality rate of lung cancer. On the other hand, the number of individuals undergoing lung cancer screening in Japan decreased from 7.92 million in 2019 to 6.59 million in 2020. The COVID-19 pandemic may have affected individuals undergoing lung cancer screening, and its impact on lung cancer needs to be continuously monitored in the future.
{"title":"Analysis of lung cancer incidence, mortality trends, and smoking rates in Japan:1975-2022 with insights on the impact of COVID-19.","authors":"Hiroki Yamamoto, Masayuki Shirasawa, Katsuhiko Naoki","doi":"10.1007/s10147-025-02695-4","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10147-025-02695-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In Japan, high-quality cancer statistics are collected through cancer registries. However, these data are rarely summarized or reported in research articles. We compiled statistical data on lung cancer in Japan including the COVID-19 pandemic. In 2019, the number of cases of lung cancer in Japan was 126,548. The age-adjusted incidence rate of lung cancer increased from 23.2/100,000 to 42.4/100,000 in males and from 7.2/100,000 to 18.3/100,000 in females between 1975 and 2019. The age-adjusted mortality rate of lung cancer in Japan increased since 2000, after which it decreased. This trend was similar in both males and females. We also investigated statistics on lung cancer worldwide (Australia, Sweden, England, and the United States [USA]). The age-adjusted incidence rate of lung cancer in the data standardized to the world population for males has increased only in Japan; for females, it has decreased only in the USA. Global age-adjusted lung cancer mortality rates have been declining in all countries. In addition, the COVID-19 pandemic has not affected the age-adjusted mortality rate of lung cancer. On the other hand, the number of individuals undergoing lung cancer screening in Japan decreased from 7.92 million in 2019 to 6.59 million in 2020. The COVID-19 pandemic may have affected individuals undergoing lung cancer screening, and its impact on lung cancer needs to be continuously monitored in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":13869,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"199-209"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143004877","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}