Background: Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes-ultrasonography (TILs-US) score is used to predict lymphocyte-predominant breast cancer (LPBC) in surgical specimens. We aimed to compare diagnostic performance of TILs-US score for predicting pathological complete response (pCR) with that of LPBC in biopsy specimens.
Methods: TILs ≥ 50% in biopsy specimens was defined as biopsy-LPBC, and TILs-US score ≥ 4 was categorized as TILs-US score-high. Basic nomogram for pCR was developed using stepwise logistic regression based on the smallest Akaike Information Criterion, and biopsy-LPBC and TILs-US score nomograms were developed by integrating biopsy-LPBC or TILs-US scores into a basic nomogram. The diagnostic performance of the nomograms for pCR was compared using area under the curve (AUC), categorical net reclassification improvement (NRI), and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI).
Results: This retrospective study evaluated 118 patients with breast cancer, including 33 (28.0%) with biopsy-LPBC, 52 (44.1%) with TILs-US score-high, with 34 (28.8%) achieving pCR. The sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and AUC for predicting pCR were 0.53, 0.82, 2.96, 0.57, and 0.68, respectively, for biopsy-LPBC, and 0.76, 0.69, 2.47, 0.34, and 0.73, respectively, for TILs-US score. The biopsy-LPBC nomogram showed significant improvements in categorical NRI (p = 0.023) and IDI (p = 0.007) but not in AUC (p = 0.25), compared with the basic nomogram. The TILs-US nomogram exhibited significant improvements in AUC (p = 0.039), categorical NRI (p = 0.010), and IDI (p < 0.001).
Conclusions: The TILs-US score may serve as a novel marker for prediction of pCR in patients with breast cancer. An external validation study is warranted to confirm our findings.
{"title":"Diagnostic performance of TILs-US score and LPBC in biopsy specimens for predicting pathological complete response in patients with breast cancer.","authors":"Hideo Shigematsu, Kayo Fukui, Akiko Kanou, Erika Yokoyama, Makiko Tanaka, Mutsumi Fujimoto, Kanako Suzuki, Haruka Ikejiri, Ai Amioka, Emiko Hiraoka, Shinsuke Sasada, Akiko Emi, Tetsuya Nakagiri, Koji Arihiro, Morihito Okada","doi":"10.1007/s10147-024-02634-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10147-024-02634-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes-ultrasonography (TILs-US) score is used to predict lymphocyte-predominant breast cancer (LPBC) in surgical specimens. We aimed to compare diagnostic performance of TILs-US score for predicting pathological complete response (pCR) with that of LPBC in biopsy specimens.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>TILs ≥ 50% in biopsy specimens was defined as biopsy-LPBC, and TILs-US score ≥ 4 was categorized as TILs-US score-high. Basic nomogram for pCR was developed using stepwise logistic regression based on the smallest Akaike Information Criterion, and biopsy-LPBC and TILs-US score nomograms were developed by integrating biopsy-LPBC or TILs-US scores into a basic nomogram. The diagnostic performance of the nomograms for pCR was compared using area under the curve (AUC), categorical net reclassification improvement (NRI), and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This retrospective study evaluated 118 patients with breast cancer, including 33 (28.0%) with biopsy-LPBC, 52 (44.1%) with TILs-US score-high, with 34 (28.8%) achieving pCR. The sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and AUC for predicting pCR were 0.53, 0.82, 2.96, 0.57, and 0.68, respectively, for biopsy-LPBC, and 0.76, 0.69, 2.47, 0.34, and 0.73, respectively, for TILs-US score. The biopsy-LPBC nomogram showed significant improvements in categorical NRI (p = 0.023) and IDI (p = 0.007) but not in AUC (p = 0.25), compared with the basic nomogram. The TILs-US nomogram exhibited significant improvements in AUC (p = 0.039), categorical NRI (p = 0.010), and IDI (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The TILs-US score may serve as a novel marker for prediction of pCR in patients with breast cancer. An external validation study is warranted to confirm our findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":13869,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1860-1869"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11588827/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142371783","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Cisplatin (CDDP) is an anticancer drug used to treat several types of cancer. CDDP-induced nephrotoxicity (CIN) is a serious adverse effect of CDDP treatment. Although magnesium sulfate (Mg) premedication has been proven to prevent CIN, the relationship between Mg dosage and its preventive effects on CIN are unknown. Therefore, we have evaluated this relationship using meta-analysis and meta-regression analysis to optimize cancer chemotherapies, including CDDP.
Methods: We selected candidate studies, generated a forest plot to evaluate the preventive effects of Mg on CIN, and performed subgroup analyses. Moreover, a meta-regression analysis was conducted to reveal the relationship between Mg dosage and its preventive effects on CIN.
Results: We identified 17 related studies and the total odds ratio (OR) of Mg premedication on CIN was 0.26 and the 95% confidence interval (95% CI) was 0.17-0.41 (p < 0.00001) although funnel plot suggested asymmetry. In subgroup analysis by forest plot, total OR with 95% CI of low Mg dosage administration (less than 10 mEq) and high Mg dosage administration (10 mEq or higher) was 0.35 (0.16-0.77, p = 0.0169) and 0.12 (0.07-0.21, p < 0.0001), respectively. In addition, meta-regression analysis was performed on Mg dosage and the OR of related studies, indicating a relationship between Mg dosage and OR (p = 0.0349).
Conclusion: This study has revealed that premedication with Mg prevented CIN in a dose-dependent manner.
{"title":"Relationship between magnesium dosage and the preventive effect on cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity: meta-analysis and meta-regression analysis.","authors":"Keisuke Okamoto, Yoshitaka Saito, Atsushi Yamaguchi, Katsuya Narumi, Masaki Kobayashi","doi":"10.1007/s10147-024-02629-6","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10147-024-02629-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cisplatin (CDDP) is an anticancer drug used to treat several types of cancer. CDDP-induced nephrotoxicity (CIN) is a serious adverse effect of CDDP treatment. Although magnesium sulfate (Mg) premedication has been proven to prevent CIN, the relationship between Mg dosage and its preventive effects on CIN are unknown. Therefore, we have evaluated this relationship using meta-analysis and meta-regression analysis to optimize cancer chemotherapies, including CDDP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We selected candidate studies, generated a forest plot to evaluate the preventive effects of Mg on CIN, and performed subgroup analyses. Moreover, a meta-regression analysis was conducted to reveal the relationship between Mg dosage and its preventive effects on CIN.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 17 related studies and the total odds ratio (OR) of Mg premedication on CIN was 0.26 and the 95% confidence interval (95% CI) was 0.17-0.41 (p < 0.00001) although funnel plot suggested asymmetry. In subgroup analysis by forest plot, total OR with 95% CI of low Mg dosage administration (less than 10 mEq) and high Mg dosage administration (10 mEq or higher) was 0.35 (0.16-0.77, p = 0.0169) and 0.12 (0.07-0.21, p < 0.0001), respectively. In addition, meta-regression analysis was performed on Mg dosage and the OR of related studies, indicating a relationship between Mg dosage and OR (p = 0.0349).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study has revealed that premedication with Mg prevented CIN in a dose-dependent manner.</p>","PeriodicalId":13869,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1817-1824"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142346138","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
As a result of the recent advances in first-line treatment including chemotherapy, radiation therapy, targeted therapy, and immune checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy (ICI) for locally advanced/metastatic initially unresectable esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancer, surgery aiming at cure after initial treatment, so-called "conversion surgery" has become more common in this field. Several studies have indicated encouraging survival outcomes for patients after conversion surgery with R0 resection. However, various issues, such the utility and the safety of conversion surgery remain unclear. In this review, we will focus on the surgical treatment for initially unresectable esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancer after first- or later- line treatment and review recent evidence regarding the safety and the efficacy of conversion surgery. Multidisciplinary treatment including surgery may serve as a novel treatment strategy for esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancer, thus provide a curative treatment option and potentially contribute to better prognosis for initially untreatable diseases.
{"title":"Conversion surgery for esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancer.","authors":"Yoshiaki Shoji, Kohei Kanamori, Kazuo Koyanagi, Tetsuya Otsuka, Rie Nakashima, Kohei Tajima, Mika Ogimi, Yamato Ninomiya, Miho Yamamoto, Akihito Kazuno, Takayuki Nishi, Masaki Mori","doi":"10.1007/s10147-024-02639-4","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10147-024-02639-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As a result of the recent advances in first-line treatment including chemotherapy, radiation therapy, targeted therapy, and immune checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy (ICI) for locally advanced/metastatic initially unresectable esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancer, surgery aiming at cure after initial treatment, so-called \"conversion surgery\" has become more common in this field. Several studies have indicated encouraging survival outcomes for patients after conversion surgery with R0 resection. However, various issues, such the utility and the safety of conversion surgery remain unclear. In this review, we will focus on the surgical treatment for initially unresectable esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancer after first- or later- line treatment and review recent evidence regarding the safety and the efficacy of conversion surgery. Multidisciplinary treatment including surgery may serve as a novel treatment strategy for esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancer, thus provide a curative treatment option and potentially contribute to better prognosis for initially untreatable diseases.</p>","PeriodicalId":13869,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1777-1784"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11588808/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142464529","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-01Epub Date: 2024-09-25DOI: 10.1007/s10147-024-02628-7
Mayu Fukuda, Koji Yamanoi, Nobutaka Hayashi, Yasushi Kotani, Kazuki Yamano, Hisanori Matsumoto, Takahito Ashihara, Kaoru Abiko, Yukio Yamanishi, Yoko Iemura, Mana Taki, Ryusuke Murakami, Akihito Horie, Ken Yamaguchi, Junzo Hamanishi, Masaki Mandai
Background: The actual status of comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) applications in Japan has not been clarified. We conducted a multicenter study to investigate the real-world application of CGP in gynecological malignancies.
Methods: Nine designated cancer hospitals participated in this study. Patients who underwent CGP in 2020-2021 were assigned to the CGP group (n = 134). For the population that would have been eligible for CGP, patients who received initial treatment in 2015-2016 and were either alive with disease or died of disease at 5 years follow up were included in the control group (n = 316). We compared clinicopathological characteristics including tumor type (cervix, corpus, ovary, and others including sarcoma) and age. We also investigated the context of CGP-recommended treatment.
Results: The CGP group had significantly fewer cervical cases and more others cases (cervix/corpus/ovary/others: CGP, 22/44/56/12; control, 89/79/142/6; p = 0.0003). The CGP group was significantly younger than the control group (median: CGP, 54.0; control, 65.0; p < 0.0001). Subgroup analyses revealed that patients with cervical and ovarian cancers were significantly younger in the CGP group. Among the CGP group, 17 patients (12.7%) received CGP-recommended treatments, 15 of which were not covered by public insurance. The survival time after CGP in 17 patients was longer than in the other 117 cases (median 21 vs. 11 months).
Conclusion: There was significant selection bias in tumor type and age for the application of CGP for gynecological malignancies in clinical practice in Japan. While CGP often recommended drugs not covered by public insurance, prognosis can be improved by use of CGP.
{"title":"Real-world application of comprehensive genomic profiling for gynecological malignancies: a multicenter observational study.","authors":"Mayu Fukuda, Koji Yamanoi, Nobutaka Hayashi, Yasushi Kotani, Kazuki Yamano, Hisanori Matsumoto, Takahito Ashihara, Kaoru Abiko, Yukio Yamanishi, Yoko Iemura, Mana Taki, Ryusuke Murakami, Akihito Horie, Ken Yamaguchi, Junzo Hamanishi, Masaki Mandai","doi":"10.1007/s10147-024-02628-7","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10147-024-02628-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The actual status of comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) applications in Japan has not been clarified. We conducted a multicenter study to investigate the real-world application of CGP in gynecological malignancies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nine designated cancer hospitals participated in this study. Patients who underwent CGP in 2020-2021 were assigned to the CGP group (n = 134). For the population that would have been eligible for CGP, patients who received initial treatment in 2015-2016 and were either alive with disease or died of disease at 5 years follow up were included in the control group (n = 316). We compared clinicopathological characteristics including tumor type (cervix, corpus, ovary, and others including sarcoma) and age. We also investigated the context of CGP-recommended treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CGP group had significantly fewer cervical cases and more others cases (cervix/corpus/ovary/others: CGP, 22/44/56/12; control, 89/79/142/6; p = 0.0003). The CGP group was significantly younger than the control group (median: CGP, 54.0; control, 65.0; p < 0.0001). Subgroup analyses revealed that patients with cervical and ovarian cancers were significantly younger in the CGP group. Among the CGP group, 17 patients (12.7%) received CGP-recommended treatments, 15 of which were not covered by public insurance. The survival time after CGP in 17 patients was longer than in the other 117 cases (median 21 vs. 11 months).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was significant selection bias in tumor type and age for the application of CGP for gynecological malignancies in clinical practice in Japan. While CGP often recommended drugs not covered by public insurance, prognosis can be improved by use of CGP.</p>","PeriodicalId":13869,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1967-1976"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142346126","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Palonosetron, a second-generation 5-HT3 receptor antagonist (5-HT3RA), is more effective than first-generation 5-HT3RA. Several studies have investigated whether dexamethasone (DEX), when combined with palonosetron as a 5-HT3RA, can be spared in the delayed phase after moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC). In this systematic review, we aimed to determine which between 1- and 3-day DEX administration, when combined with palonosetron, is more useful in patients receiving MEC.
Methods: The PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Ichushi-Web databases were searched for relevant studies published between 1990 and 2020. We included studies that compared the efficacy of 1- and 3-day DEX administration in preventing nausea and vomiting associated with MEC. Outcomes were "prevention of vomiting (complete response rate and no vomiting rate)," "prevention of nausea" (complete control rate, total control rate, no nausea rate, and no clinically significant nausea rate)" in the delayed phase, "prevention of blood glucose level elevation," and "prevention of osteoporosis."
Results: Eight studies were included in this systematic review. The no vomiting rate was significantly higher in the 3-day DEX group than in the 1-day DEX group. However, the other efficacy items did not significantly differ between the two groups. Meanwhile, insufficient evidence was obtained for "prevention of blood glucose level elevation" and "prevention of osteoporosis."
Conclusions: No significant differences in most antiemetic effects were found between 1- and 3-day DEX administration. Thus, DEX administration could be shortened from 3 days to 1 day when used in combination with palonosetron.
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of dexamethasone sparing for the prevention of nausea and vomiting associated with moderately emetogenic chemotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Antiemesis 2023 from Japan Society of Clinical Oncology.","authors":"Kazuhisa Nakashima, Ayako Yokomizo, Michiyasu Murakami, Kenji Okita, Makoto Wada, Keiko Iino, Tatsuo Akechi, Hirotoshi Iihara, Chiyo K Imamura, Ayako Okuyama, Keiko Ozawa, Yong-Il Kim, Hidenori Sasaki, Eriko Satomi, Masayuki Takeda, Ryuhei Tanaka, Takako Eguchi Nakajima, Naoki Nakamura, Junichi Nishimura, Mayumi Noda, Kazumi Hayashi, Takahiro Higashi, Narikazu Boku, Koji Matsumoto, Yoko Matsumoto, Nobuyuki Yamamoto, Kenjiro Aogi, Masakazu Abe","doi":"10.1007/s10147-024-02643-8","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10147-024-02643-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Palonosetron, a second-generation 5-HT<sub>3</sub> receptor antagonist (5-HT<sub>3</sub>RA), is more effective than first-generation 5-HT<sub>3</sub>RA. Several studies have investigated whether dexamethasone (DEX), when combined with palonosetron as a 5-HT<sub>3</sub>RA, can be spared in the delayed phase after moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC). In this systematic review, we aimed to determine which between 1- and 3-day DEX administration, when combined with palonosetron, is more useful in patients receiving MEC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Ichushi-Web databases were searched for relevant studies published between 1990 and 2020. We included studies that compared the efficacy of 1- and 3-day DEX administration in preventing nausea and vomiting associated with MEC. Outcomes were \"prevention of vomiting (complete response rate and no vomiting rate),\" \"prevention of nausea\" (complete control rate, total control rate, no nausea rate, and no clinically significant nausea rate)\" in the delayed phase, \"prevention of blood glucose level elevation,\" and \"prevention of osteoporosis.\"</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight studies were included in this systematic review. The no vomiting rate was significantly higher in the 3-day DEX group than in the 1-day DEX group. However, the other efficacy items did not significantly differ between the two groups. Meanwhile, insufficient evidence was obtained for \"prevention of blood glucose level elevation\" and \"prevention of osteoporosis.\"</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>No significant differences in most antiemetic effects were found between 1- and 3-day DEX administration. Thus, DEX administration could be shortened from 3 days to 1 day when used in combination with palonosetron.</p>","PeriodicalId":13869,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1785-1794"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142464530","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Upfront androgen receptor signaling inhibitor (ARSI) along with androgen deprivation therapy is the current standard of care for metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer. However, evidence on second-line therapy after upfront ARSI is scarce. We aimed to evaluate the oncological outcome of ARSI versus docetaxel (DOC) after upfront ARSI therapy in a real-world clinical practice.
Methods: Subjects were metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients who had progressed within 2 years of upfront ARSI therapy and received ARSI (ARSI group) or DOC (DOC group) as a second-line therapy. Second-line progression-free survival (second-line PFS), and second-line overall survival (second-line OS) were assessed. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to adjust the clinicopathological features and treatment patterns.
Results: A total of 101 mCRPC patients, 68 in the ARSI group, and 33 in the DOC group, were included in this analysis. Median second-line PFS was 6.3 months in the ARSI group and 4.9 months in the DOC group (p = 0.21). Median second-line OS was 25.0 months in the ARSI group and 14.2 months in the DOC group (p = 0.06). Prostate-specific antigen nadir ≤ 0.2 ng/ml during upfront ARSI therapy was significantly associated with improved second-line PFS. After PSM, no significant difference in second-line PFS and second-line OS were observed between the two groups.
Conclusion: ARSI or DOC has comparable oncologic outcomes in terms of second-line PFS and second-line OS. Further prospective research with longer follow-ups will be needed to identify the optimal treatment after upfront ARSI therapy.
{"title":"Real-world outcomes in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer beyond progression after upfront androgen receptor signaling inhibitor.","authors":"Yutaka Yamamoto, Saizo Fujimoto, Mamoru Hashimoto, Takafumi Minami, Wataru Fukuokaya, Takafumi Yanagisawa, Masanobu Saruta, Kiyoshi Takahara, Kazuki Nishimura, Takuya Tsujino, Yuta Nakamori, Takeshi Hashimoto, Takahiro Kimura, Ryoichi Shiroki, Haruhito Azuma, Yoshio Ohno, Kazutoshi Fujita","doi":"10.1007/s10147-024-02637-6","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10147-024-02637-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Upfront androgen receptor signaling inhibitor (ARSI) along with androgen deprivation therapy is the current standard of care for metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer. However, evidence on second-line therapy after upfront ARSI is scarce. We aimed to evaluate the oncological outcome of ARSI versus docetaxel (DOC) after upfront ARSI therapy in a real-world clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Subjects were metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients who had progressed within 2 years of upfront ARSI therapy and received ARSI (ARSI group) or DOC (DOC group) as a second-line therapy. Second-line progression-free survival (second-line PFS), and second-line overall survival (second-line OS) were assessed. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to adjust the clinicopathological features and treatment patterns.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 101 mCRPC patients, 68 in the ARSI group, and 33 in the DOC group, were included in this analysis. Median second-line PFS was 6.3 months in the ARSI group and 4.9 months in the DOC group (p = 0.21). Median second-line OS was 25.0 months in the ARSI group and 14.2 months in the DOC group (p = 0.06). Prostate-specific antigen nadir ≤ 0.2 ng/ml during upfront ARSI therapy was significantly associated with improved second-line PFS. After PSM, no significant difference in second-line PFS and second-line OS were observed between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ARSI or DOC has comparable oncologic outcomes in terms of second-line PFS and second-line OS. Further prospective research with longer follow-ups will be needed to identify the optimal treatment after upfront ARSI therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":13869,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1946-1958"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142346137","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab is a standard first-line chemotherapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, due to the severe toxicities, this regimen is not widely used. There is limited data on the real-world efficacy and safety.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of clinical data from mCRC patients who received FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab as first-line chemotherapy at 31 institutions. The initial dose was standardized according to the TRIBE regimen. Induction therapy was defined as a combination of oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and fluorouracil.
Results: Out of 104 patients who met the criteria, the median age was 58 years (range, 16-72). 81% of patients had an eastern cooperative oncology group performance status (PS) of 0. An initial dose reduction was observed in 63% of patients. The median number of preplanned induction therapy cycles was 12 (range, 4-12). The completion of scheduled induction therapy cycles was observed in 45% of patients, with treatment-related toxicities being the main reason for discontinuation (63%). The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 12.8 months (95% CI, 10.6-15.0) and 27.9 months (95% CI 21.6-34.2), respectively. The objective response rate and disease control rate were 63.7% and 98.9%, respectively. The R0 resection rate was 21.2%. The main grade 3 or higher toxicities were neutropenia (51%), febrile neutropenia (10%), and nausea/vomiting (5%). No treatment-related deaths were observed.
Conclusion: In a real-world clinical setting, FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab demonstrated efficacy and safety comparable to previous clinical trials.
{"title":"Real-world outcomes of FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: the JSCCR-TRIPON study.","authors":"Yoshiyuki Yamamoto, Hiroki Yukami, Tatsuro Yamaguchi, Hisatsugu Ohori, Sachiko Nagasu, Yoshinori Kagawa, Naotoshi Sugimoto, Hiromichi Sonoda, Kentaro Yamazaki, Atsuo Takashima, Hiroyuki Okuyama, Hiroko Hasegawa, Chihiro Kondo, Eishi Baba, Toshihiko Matsumoto, Yasuyuki Kawamoto, Masato Kataoka, Yoshiaki Shindo, Toshiaki Ishikawa, Taito Esaki, Yosuke Kito, Takeo Sato, Taro Funakoshi, Toshifumi Yamaguchi, Yasuhiro Shimada, Toshikazu Moriwaki","doi":"10.1007/s10147-024-02613-0","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10147-024-02613-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab is a standard first-line chemotherapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, due to the severe toxicities, this regimen is not widely used. There is limited data on the real-world efficacy and safety.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of clinical data from mCRC patients who received FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab as first-line chemotherapy at 31 institutions. The initial dose was standardized according to the TRIBE regimen. Induction therapy was defined as a combination of oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and fluorouracil.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 104 patients who met the criteria, the median age was 58 years (range, 16-72). 81% of patients had an eastern cooperative oncology group performance status (PS) of 0. An initial dose reduction was observed in 63% of patients. The median number of preplanned induction therapy cycles was 12 (range, 4-12). The completion of scheduled induction therapy cycles was observed in 45% of patients, with treatment-related toxicities being the main reason for discontinuation (63%). The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 12.8 months (95% CI, 10.6-15.0) and 27.9 months (95% CI 21.6-34.2), respectively. The objective response rate and disease control rate were 63.7% and 98.9%, respectively. The R0 resection rate was 21.2%. The main grade 3 or higher toxicities were neutropenia (51%), febrile neutropenia (10%), and nausea/vomiting (5%). No treatment-related deaths were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In a real-world clinical setting, FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab demonstrated efficacy and safety comparable to previous clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":13869,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1878-1886"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142080258","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Radical cystectomy in women generally includes the removal of the uterus, ovaries, and anterior vaginal wall, but the criteria for reproductive organ sparing are not clear.
Methods: A total of 2674 patients with bladder cancer were retrospectively reviewed, having undergone cystectomy at this nationwide multicenter from January 2013 to December 2019. We evaluated the incidence of malignancy in reproductive organs in a cohort of 417 women and analyzed the clinicopathological features of reproductive organ involvement. Recurrence-free survival and overall survival were reported using Kaplan-Meier survival curves.
Results: Median follow-up was 36.9 months. Of the 417 patients with urothelial carcinoma of the bladder, 325 underwent hysterectomy, and 92 had a spared uterus and anterior wall of the vagina. Twenty-nine (8.9%) patients exhibited reproductive organ involvement; this consisted of 22 (6.8%) uteri, 16 (4.9%) vaginas, and two (0.6%) ovaries. Incidental primary reproductive malignancies were found in only two (0.6%) patients. Recurrence-free survival and overall survival were significantly shorter in patients with reproductive organ involvement than in those without. Patients with reproductive organ involvement were more likely to have tumors with ≥ cT3 or sub-localization at the posterior/trigone/bladder neck.
Conclusions: The risk of reproductive organ involvement cannot be ignored in women undergoing radical cystectomy for urothelial carcinoma of the bladder, therefore, the eligibility criteria for reproductive organ preservation should be considered carefully.
{"title":"Reproductive organ involvement in women undergoing radical cystectomy for urothelial bladder cancer: a nationwide multicenter study.","authors":"Minoru Kato, Rikiya Taoka, Jun Miki, Ryoichi Saito, Wataru Fukuokaya, Yoshiyuki Matsui, Shoma Yamamoto, Taisuke Matsue, Shingo Hatakeyama, Takashi Kawahara, Ayumu Matsuda, Taketo Kawai, Tomokazu Sazuka, Takeshi Sano, Fumihiko Urabe, Soki Kashima, Hirohito Naito, Yoji Murakami, Makito Miyake, Kei Daizumoto, Yuto Matsushita, Takuji Hayashi, Junichi Inokuchi, Yusuke Sugino, Kenichiro Shiga, Noriya Yamaguchi, Shingo Yamamoto, Keiji Yasue, Takashige Abe, Shotaro Nakanishi, Katsuyoshi Hashine, Masato Fujii, Kiyoaki Nishihara, Hiroaki Matsumoto, Shuichi Tatarano, Koichiro Wada, Sho Sekito, Ryo Maruyama, Naotaka Nishiyama, Hiroyuki Nishiyama, Hiroshi Kitamura, Junji Uchida","doi":"10.1007/s10147-024-02636-7","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10147-024-02636-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Radical cystectomy in women generally includes the removal of the uterus, ovaries, and anterior vaginal wall, but the criteria for reproductive organ sparing are not clear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 2674 patients with bladder cancer were retrospectively reviewed, having undergone cystectomy at this nationwide multicenter from January 2013 to December 2019. We evaluated the incidence of malignancy in reproductive organs in a cohort of 417 women and analyzed the clinicopathological features of reproductive organ involvement. Recurrence-free survival and overall survival were reported using Kaplan-Meier survival curves.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median follow-up was 36.9 months. Of the 417 patients with urothelial carcinoma of the bladder, 325 underwent hysterectomy, and 92 had a spared uterus and anterior wall of the vagina. Twenty-nine (8.9%) patients exhibited reproductive organ involvement; this consisted of 22 (6.8%) uteri, 16 (4.9%) vaginas, and two (0.6%) ovaries. Incidental primary reproductive malignancies were found in only two (0.6%) patients. Recurrence-free survival and overall survival were significantly shorter in patients with reproductive organ involvement than in those without. Patients with reproductive organ involvement were more likely to have tumors with ≥ cT3 or sub-localization at the posterior/trigone/bladder neck.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The risk of reproductive organ involvement cannot be ignored in women undergoing radical cystectomy for urothelial carcinoma of the bladder, therefore, the eligibility criteria for reproductive organ preservation should be considered carefully.</p>","PeriodicalId":13869,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1937-1945"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142390413","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Lateral node metastasis confers a poor prognosis in rectal cancer. Several multidisciplinary treatments have been proposed with favorable outcomes. However, appropriate neoadjuvant/adjuvant treatments or follow-up plans based on information about the probable recurrence site have not been specified. We aimed to clarify the distinctive features of recurrence patterns for lateral node-positive low rectal cancer according to the lateral and mesorectal lymph node status.
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 508 patients with stage III low rectal cancer who underwent lateral node dissection. We investigated the impact of lateral and mesorectal lymph node status on site-specific recurrence rates and patient survival.
Results: Analyses for relapse-free survival revealed the prognostic impact of lateral node positivity in stage III low rectal cancer (p < 0.0001). Lateral node-positive patients exhibited higher risk of overall recurrence, local recurrence, and recurrence in extra-regional nodes than lateral node-negative patients (p < 0.0001, p = 0.001, and p < 0.0001, respectively). However, lateral node positivity was not statistically associated with a hematogenous recurrence rate. In lateral node-positive patients, both tumor-node-metastasis (TNM)-N status and number of lateral nodes involved were revealed as significant prognostic factors (p < 0.0001, both). In addition, the number of lateral nodes involved could be a discriminatory indicator of probabilities of local recurrence and recurrence in extra-regional nodes (p = 0.02, and p < 0.0001, respectively).
Conclusions: Lateral node-positive low rectal cancer exhibits higher local recurrence and extra-regional node recurrence rates that correlate with the number of lateral nodes involved.
背景:直肠癌侧结节转移预后较差。目前已提出了几种多学科治疗方法,并取得了良好的疗效。然而,基于可能复发部位的信息,适当的新辅助/辅助治疗或随访计划尚未明确。我们旨在阐明侧结节阳性低位直肠癌根据侧结节和直肠间淋巴结状态的复发模式的不同特点:我们回顾性分析了 508 例接受侧结节清扫术的 III 期低位直肠癌患者。我们研究了侧淋巴结和直肠间淋巴结状态对特定部位复发率和患者生存期的影响:结果:对无复发生存率的分析表明,侧结节阳性对 III 期低位直肠癌的预后有影响(P侧结节阳性低位直肠癌的局部复发率和区域外结节复发率较高,这与受累侧结节的数量有关。
{"title":"Lateral node metastasis in low rectal cancer as a hallmark to predict recurrence patterns.","authors":"Eiji Shinto, Hideyuki Ike, Masaaki Ito, Keiichi Takahashi, Masayuki Ohue, Yukihide Kanemitsu, Takeshi Suto, Tetsushi Kinugasa, Jun Watanabe, Jin-Ichi Hida, Michio Itabashi, Heita Ozawa, Hiroaki Nozawa, Yojiro Hashiguchi, Kazuo Hase, Kenichi Sugihara, Yoichi Ajioka","doi":"10.1007/s10147-024-02630-z","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10147-024-02630-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lateral node metastasis confers a poor prognosis in rectal cancer. Several multidisciplinary treatments have been proposed with favorable outcomes. However, appropriate neoadjuvant/adjuvant treatments or follow-up plans based on information about the probable recurrence site have not been specified. We aimed to clarify the distinctive features of recurrence patterns for lateral node-positive low rectal cancer according to the lateral and mesorectal lymph node status.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 508 patients with stage III low rectal cancer who underwent lateral node dissection. We investigated the impact of lateral and mesorectal lymph node status on site-specific recurrence rates and patient survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analyses for relapse-free survival revealed the prognostic impact of lateral node positivity in stage III low rectal cancer (p < 0.0001). Lateral node-positive patients exhibited higher risk of overall recurrence, local recurrence, and recurrence in extra-regional nodes than lateral node-negative patients (p < 0.0001, p = 0.001, and p < 0.0001, respectively). However, lateral node positivity was not statistically associated with a hematogenous recurrence rate. In lateral node-positive patients, both tumor-node-metastasis (TNM)-N status and number of lateral nodes involved were revealed as significant prognostic factors (p < 0.0001, both). In addition, the number of lateral nodes involved could be a discriminatory indicator of probabilities of local recurrence and recurrence in extra-regional nodes (p = 0.02, and p < 0.0001, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Lateral node-positive low rectal cancer exhibits higher local recurrence and extra-regional node recurrence rates that correlate with the number of lateral nodes involved.</p>","PeriodicalId":13869,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1896-1907"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142464531","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Combined treatment with lenvatinib and pembrolizumab is currently regarded as one of the standard first-line therapies for advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) patients. The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of this combined regimen in treatment-naïve Japanese aRCC patients.
Methods: This study included a total of 50 consecutive aRCC patients receiving combined lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in routine clinical practice in Japan, and comprehensively analyzed clinical outcomes of this treatment.
Results: Of these 50, 7 (14.0%), 23 (46.0%) and 20 (40.0%) were classified into favorable, intermediate and poor risk groups, respectively, according to the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) system. Responses to this combined therapy in the 50 patients were as follows: complete response, 7 (14.0%); partial response, 26 (52.0%); stable disease, 15 (30%) and progressive disease, 2 (4%); thus, the objective response rate (ORR) was 66%. ORRs in favorable, intermediate and poor risk groups were 57.1, 69.6 and 65.0%, respectively. During the observation period, disease progression and death occurred in 14 (28.0%) and 6 (12.0%) patients, respectively, and neither the median PFS nor OS was reached. Adverse events and those corresponding to grade ≥ 3 were observed in all (100%) and 33 (66.0%) patients, respectively.
Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first study focusing on real-world outcomes of lenvatinib and pembrolizumab for treatment-naïve aRCC patients, showing that the efficacy and safety of this combined regimen are similar to those noted in randomized clinical trial.
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of lenvatinib and pembrolizumab as first-line treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma patients: real-world experience in Japan.","authors":"Takuto Hara, Kotaro Suzuki, Yasuyoshi Okamura, Koji Chiba, Ryo Sato, Yuto Matsushita, Keita Tamura, Gaku Ishikawa, Atsushi Otsuka, Hideaki Miyake","doi":"10.1007/s10147-024-02633-w","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10147-024-02633-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Combined treatment with lenvatinib and pembrolizumab is currently regarded as one of the standard first-line therapies for advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) patients. The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of this combined regimen in treatment-naïve Japanese aRCC patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included a total of 50 consecutive aRCC patients receiving combined lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in routine clinical practice in Japan, and comprehensively analyzed clinical outcomes of this treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of these 50, 7 (14.0%), 23 (46.0%) and 20 (40.0%) were classified into favorable, intermediate and poor risk groups, respectively, according to the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) system. Responses to this combined therapy in the 50 patients were as follows: complete response, 7 (14.0%); partial response, 26 (52.0%); stable disease, 15 (30%) and progressive disease, 2 (4%); thus, the objective response rate (ORR) was 66%. ORRs in favorable, intermediate and poor risk groups were 57.1, 69.6 and 65.0%, respectively. During the observation period, disease progression and death occurred in 14 (28.0%) and 6 (12.0%) patients, respectively, and neither the median PFS nor OS was reached. Adverse events and those corresponding to grade ≥ 3 were observed in all (100%) and 33 (66.0%) patients, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>To our knowledge, this is the first study focusing on real-world outcomes of lenvatinib and pembrolizumab for treatment-naïve aRCC patients, showing that the efficacy and safety of this combined regimen are similar to those noted in randomized clinical trial.</p>","PeriodicalId":13869,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1931-1936"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142545317","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}