International Journal of Clinical Oncology最新文献

Background: Osteosarcoma, the most common primary bone malignancy, has a complex genetic basis and two incidence peaks. In younger patients, the standard treatment involves wide surgical resection combined with adjuvant chemotherapy; however, the role of chemotherapy in elderly patients remains controversial. The aims of this study were to investigate genetic differences between younger and elderly patients with osteosarcoma and to identify genetic signatures associated with chemotherapy response.

Methods: Genetic alterations were analyzed using cancer genome profiling data for 204 patients with osteosarcoma obtained from the Center for Cancer Genomics and Advanced Therapeutics.

Results: The mutation spectrum was consistent with previous results for osteosarcoma. CCNE1, MCL1, MYC, and RB1 alterations were significantly associated with a younger age, while CDK4, CDKN2A, CDKN2B, H3F3A, KMT2D, MDM2, RAC1, and SETD2 alterations were significantly associated with an older age. Age, unsupervised clustering of gene alterations, and MYC amplifications were significantly associated with the response to ifosfamide. Notably, both clustered mutation signatures and MYC amplification were correlated with age.

Conclusions: These findings suggest that distinct oncogenic mechanisms contribute to differential sensitivity to chemotherapy in younger and elderly patients. Cancer genome profiling may aid in chemotherapy selection, and its early implementation is recommended to optimize treatment strategies.

Background: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the association between health-related quality of life (HRQOL) as measured with the Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) or Short Form 12 Health Survey (SF-12) and mortality risk in patients with diverse types of cancer.

Methods: A literature search was conducted using CINAHL, PubMed/MEDLINE, and Scopus databases to collect articles published before December 2022. Of these, observational studies that examined the association between HRQOL and mortality risk in patients with various cancer types were extracted. A subgroup analysis with a focus on the timing when HRQOL assessment was performed.

Results: Nineteen studies were included in the final analysis. Through overall analysis of the timing of HRQOL measurements, most domains were found to be significantly associated with the mortality risk, irrespective of the timing of assessment, but HRQOL assessed in pre-treatment and palliative phases had particularly strong association.

Conclusions: In the present review, the physical functioning domain of HRQOL was found to be associated with mortality risk in a diverse group of cancer patients. This suggests the need for supportive care to improve HRQOL in cancer patients.

Background: Biweekly irinotecan plus cisplatin combination therapy (BIRIP) and irinotecan monotherapy (IRI) are both expectable second-line chemotherapy (SLC) options for treating advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Although many patients receiving SLC have undergone gastrectomy, the impact of gastrectomy on SLC remains unclear, and the impact of gastrectomy may vary from regimen to regimen.

Patients and methods: A total of 290 eligible patients registered in two randomized phase III trials evaluating BIRIP (IRI, 60 mg/m²; CDDP, 30 mg/m², q2w) or IRI (150 mg/m², q2w) for patients with AGC was classified into the prior gastrectomy subgroup (PGG) or the no gastrectomy subgroup (NGG). We performed a subgroup analysis to evaluate the impact of gastrectomy on second-line BIRIP and IRI.

Results: The BIRIP demonstrated significantly longer OS (11.1 vs. 6.8 months; HR 0.64; P = 0.026) and PFS (3.7 vs. 2.3 months; HR 0.54; P = 0.003) than the IRI, as well as better ORR (23.5% vs. 7.1%, P = 0.046) and DCR (74.5% vs. 47.6%, P = 0.010) in NGG. Although in PGG, the BIRIP failed to demonstrate differences in OS (13.8 vs. 13.8 months; HR 0.94; P = 0.722), PFS (4.9 vs. 4.5 months; HR 0.82; P = 0.194), ORR (18.3% vs. 20.5%) and DCR (70.4% vs. 65.1%). The incidence of grade 3 or worse adverse events did not differ except for a high incidence of anemia in the BIRIP group in PGG.

Conclusions: BIRIP was an effective treatment option that may improve survival outcomes among patients with AGC without previous gastrectomy.

Clinical trial registration: UMIN000025367.

Early cancer detection substantially improves the rate of patient survival; however, conventional screening methods are directed at single anatomical sites and focus primarily on a limited number of cancers, such as gastric, colorectal, lung, breast, and cervical cancer. Additionally, several cancers are inadequately screened, hindering early detection of 45.5% cases. In contrast, Multi-Cancer Early Detection (MCED) assays offer simultaneous screening of multiple cancers from a single liquid biopsy and identify molecular changes before symptom onset. These tests assess DNA mutations, abnormal DNA methylation patterns, fragmented DNA, and other tumor-derived biomarkers, indicating the presence of cancer and predicting its origin. Moreover, MCED assays concurrently detect multiple cancers without recommended screening protocols, potentially revolutionizing cancer screening and management. Large trials have reported promising results, achieving 50-95% sensitivity and 89-99% specificity for multiple cancer types. However, challenges, regarding improving accuracy, addressing ethical issues (e.g., psychosocial impact assessment), and integrating MCED into healthcare systems, must be addressed to achieve widespread adoption. Furthermore, prospective multi-institutional studies are crucial for demonstrating the clinical benefits in diverse populations. This review provides an overview of the principles, development status, and clinical significance of MCED tests, and discusses their potential and challenges.

Background and objective: Lymph node metastasis (LNM) in soft tissue sarcoma (STS) of the extremities is relatively rare. We aimed to evaluate the prognosis and the survival of patients with LNM and correlate them to the pattern of metastasis.

Methods: A retrospective study of patients diagnosed with STS of the extremities from 2015 to 2019.

Results: 111/1506 patients (7.4%) had LNM. Nodal metastasis was correlated significantly with old age, advanced tumor stages, high-grade tumors, presence of Lymphovascular invasion (LVI), and resection margins <  = 2 cm. Metachronous LNM was documented in 96 patients (86.5%) and synchronous LNM in 15 patients (13.5%). The 6-year overall survival (OS) was 36.3% for those with LNM and 52.9% for those without LNM. The 6-year disease-free survival (DFS) was 5.7% for those with LNM and 32.6% for those without LNM. Metachronus pattern of LNM showed a significantly poorer outcome regarding 6-year OS and DFS than the synchronous pattern.

Conclusions: LNM significantly negatively predicts OS and DFS in the extremities' STS. In particular, the metachronous pattern of LNM indicates a grave prognosis as these patients are supposed to harbor an occult LNM at presentation and were not subjected to lymphadenectomy at their initial primary treatment surgery. Therefore, seeking a valid noninvasive diagnostic tool such as sentinel lymph node biopsy to detect nodal metastasis is necessary.

Background: Treatment-related skin reactions (TRSRs) induced by enfortumab vedotin (EV) targeting nectin-4 are among the most common adverse events. However, their association with survival and treatment response is poorly understood.

Methods: We retrospectively identified patients who received EV from December 2021 to April 2023 at Nagoya University Hospital and its affiliated facilities and extracted clinical data from their medical records. We evaluated cancer-specific survival (CSS) and progression-free survival (PFS) as survival outcomes and overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) as treatment responses between patients with and without TRSRs.

Results: In total, 67 eligible patients were identified. Thirty-four patients experienced TRSRs, and the remaining 33 did not experience TRSRs. The median follow-up period was 8 months. Patients in the TRSRs group demonstrated significantly longer median CSS (15 vs. 8 months; p = 0.003) and median PFS (10 vs. 5 months; p < 0.001) than the non-TRSRs. Regarding treatment response, the patients in the TRSRs group showed a favorable, albeit nonsignificant, treatment response trend compared with those in the non-TRSRs group (ORR, 73.5% vs. 51.5%; p = 0.107; DCR, 91.2 % vs. 81.8%; p = 0.444).

Conclusions: Patients with TRSRs demonstrated more prolonged survival and superior treatment responses to EV treatment. The role of TRSR as a surrogate marker of EV's efficacy should be further explored in prospective and sufficiently powered studies.

Surgical resection is the most effective therapeutic option for the cure in early stage resectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, despite complete resection, up to 70% of patients die within 5 years mainly due to tumor recurrence in extra-thoracic organs. Adjuvant or neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy may improve postoperative survival, but the absolute survival benefit is modest with an around 5% improvement at 5 years. Recent advance in systemic therapy has changed treatment strategy for advanced unresectable NSCLC, and also has provided a paradigm shift in treatment strategy for resectable NSCLC. For NSCLC without oncogenic driver alterations, immunotherapy using immune-checkpoint inhibitors may improve clinical outcomes in preoperative neoadjuvant setting as well as in postoperative adjuvant setting. Here, we overview recent evidence of adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy and discuss emerging clinical questions in decision-making of treatment for potentially resectable patients with NSCLC harboring no oncogenic alterations.

Background: The implementation of cancer precision medicine in Japan is deeply intertwined with insurance reimbursement policies and requires case-by-case reviews by Molecular Tumor Boards (MTBs), which impose considerable operational burdens on healthcare facilities. The extensive preparation and review times required by MTBs hinder their ability to efficiently assess comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) test results. Despite attempts to optimize MTB operations, significant challenges remain. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of QA Commons, an artificial intelligence-driven system designed to improve treatment planning using CGP analysis. QA Commons utilizes a comprehensive knowledge base of drugs, regulatory approvals, and clinical trials linked to genetic biomarkers, thereby enabling the delivery of consistent and standardized treatment recommendations. Initial assessments revealed that the QA Commons' recommendations closely matched the ideal treatment recommendations (consensus annotations), outperforming the average results of MTBs at Cancer Genomic Medicine Core Hospitals.

Methods: A clinical performance evaluation study will be conducted by comparing the QA Commons' treatment recommendations with those of the Academia Assembly, which includes medical professionals from the Cancer Genomic Medicine Core and Hub Hospitals. One hundred cases selected from the "Registry of the Academia Assembly," based on defined inclusion and exclusion criteria, will be analyzed to assess the concordance of recommendations.

Conclusion: The expected outcomes suggest that QA Commons could reduce the workload of MTB members, standardize the quality of MTB discussions, and provide consistent outcomes in repeated patient consultations. In addition, the global expansion of QA Commons could promote worldwide adoption of Japan's pioneering precision oncology system.

Background: Febrile neutropenia (FN) is a recognised adverse event associated with chemotherapy. This study investigates the impact of atezolizumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor, on the incidence of FN in patients with non-small cell lung cancer receiving concurrent chemotherapy in Japan.

Methods: This post-marketing database study was conducted using data from patients with non-small cell lung cancer provided by Medical Data Vision Co., Ltd. covering April 2008 to present. The primary outcome measured was FN incidence, and its causal association with atezolizumab use was examined by comparing the atezolizumab plus bevacizumab plus carboplatin plus paclitaxel [ABCP])-containing regimen to the BCP control group. The data period was from 1 September, 2015, to 31 December, 2021, including approval date of this drug, 21 December, 2018.

Results: The database identified 301 subjects for the ABCP regimen (exposure) group, 44 for the BCP regimen (cohort design control) group during the same period, and 207 for BCP regimen (historical cohort design control) group before the approval of atezolizumab. For historical cohort design, the incidence and adjusted incidence ratios of febrile neutropenia in the exposure group to the control group were 6.13 (95% CI 2.78-13.49) and 8.19 (95% CI 3.79-25.33), respectively. Sensitivity analysis showed FN occurred in 17% (52/301) of the exposure group, 4.5% (2/44) of the cohort design control group, and 3% (7/207) of the historical cohort design control group.

Conclusions: The incidence of FN was higher in the exposure group. Considering the study results, special caution is needed for FN occurrence in patients receiving atezolizumab.

Background: Patients with advanced solid tumors have a suboptimal prognosis. This study investigated the safety and feasibility of linperlisib, a selective phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase delta isoform (PI3Kδ) inhibitor, for treating patients with advanced solid tumors.

Methods: In this phase Ib, single-arm, open-label, multi-center clinical trial, patients with histologically confirmed advanced solid tumors from eight centers in China were enrolled to receive oral linperlisib (80 mg/day). The primary endpoint was safety.

Results: Between August 2019 and June 2022, 94 patients were enrolled in the trial and received the study treatment. The most common (≥ 20%) treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) of all grades irrespective of causality were increased aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (26.6%), proteinuria (26.6%), decreased appetite (25.5%), increased alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (22.3%), weight loss (21.3%), and anemia (21.3%). The most common grade ≥ 3 TEAEs were diarrhea (4.3%), increased AST (3.2%), increased ALT (3.2%), neutropenia (3.2%), anemia (3.2%), increased blood alkaline phosphatase (3.2%). The objective response rate (ORR) was 1.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.0-5.8), and the disease control rate (DCR) was 37.2% (95% CI 27.5-47.8). As of the data cutoff, the median follow-up time was 4.2 months (95% CI 2.8-6.9). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 1.85 months (95% CI 1.79-1.88). The median overall survival (OS) was not reached.

Conclusion: Linperlisib showed an acceptable safety profile and preliminary clinical benefit in patients with a range of advanced solid tumors. Further studies of linperlisib safety and efficacy are warranted.