Background: Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) is a preferred method for the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Two techniques of radiotherapy have been used in TNT trials so far, including long-course chemoradiotherapy (LCRT) and short-course radiotherapy (SCRT). However, to date, no study compares these techniques in a head-to-head fashion. Our objective is to compare the complete clinical response among patients with LARC who receive long or short-course radiation therapy in combination with the same chemotherapy regimen.
Methods: 158 patients (18-80 years old) with standard or high-risk LARC (T3/T4 tumor or lymph node positive) located at least 5 cm from the anal verge will be randomized into two groups: LCRT (with a dose of 50.4 Gy in 28 sessions) or SCRT (with a dose of 25 Gy in five sessions). Both of these groups will receive concurrent chemotherapy (capecitabine 825 mg/m2 twice daily) followed by consolidation chemotherapy with the CAPEOX regimen for 6 cycles or mFOLFOX7 for 9 cycles. We will compare the complete clinical response (initially 12-16 weeks after the last RT fraction and eventually 2 weeks after the last chemotherapy cycle) by MRI as the primary endpoint. Overall survival (OS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), local control, and toxicities will be evaluated after 3-5 years as the secondary endpoints.
Discussion: Advances in the treatment of rectal cancer focus on metastasis control, besides local control by using neoadjuvant therapy. Determining the complete clinical response, OS, and MFS of short-course versus long-course chemoradiation will assist in choosing the best LARC treatment protocol.
{"title":"Comparison of the Clinical Response in Total Neoadjuvant Treatment With Long-Term or Short-Term Chemoradiotherapy Followed by Consolidation Chemotherapy in Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer (TEHRAN); the Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.","authors":"Mahdi Aghili, Reza Ghalehtaki, Mahdiyeh Yaghooti-Khorasani, Seyed Masoud Miratashi Yazdi, Kasra Kolahdouzan","doi":"10.1002/cam4.71472","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cam4.71472","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) is a preferred method for the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Two techniques of radiotherapy have been used in TNT trials so far, including long-course chemoradiotherapy (LCRT) and short-course radiotherapy (SCRT). However, to date, no study compares these techniques in a head-to-head fashion. Our objective is to compare the complete clinical response among patients with LARC who receive long or short-course radiation therapy in combination with the same chemotherapy regimen.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>158 patients (18-80 years old) with standard or high-risk LARC (T3/T4 tumor or lymph node positive) located at least 5 cm from the anal verge will be randomized into two groups: LCRT (with a dose of 50.4 Gy in 28 sessions) or SCRT (with a dose of 25 Gy in five sessions). Both of these groups will receive concurrent chemotherapy (capecitabine 825 mg/m<sup>2</sup> twice daily) followed by consolidation chemotherapy with the CAPEOX regimen for 6 cycles or mFOLFOX7 for 9 cycles. We will compare the complete clinical response (initially 12-16 weeks after the last RT fraction and eventually 2 weeks after the last chemotherapy cycle) by MRI as the primary endpoint. Overall survival (OS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), local control, and toxicities will be evaluated after 3-5 years as the secondary endpoints.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Advances in the treatment of rectal cancer focus on metastasis control, besides local control by using neoadjuvant therapy. Determining the complete clinical response, OS, and MFS of short-course versus long-course chemoradiation will assist in choosing the best LARC treatment protocol.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05920928, 2023.06.27.</p>","PeriodicalId":139,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Medicine","volume":"14 24","pages":"e71472"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12714538/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145779807","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Alexander J Didier, Charlotte Lennox, Mingjia Li, Jinesh Gheeya, Asrar Alahmadi, Jacob Kaufman, Regan Memmott, Kai He, Peter Shields, Christian Rolfo, David P Carbone, Carolyn Presley, Dwight Owen, Logan Roof
Introduction: Pleural mesothelioma (PM) is a rare, aggressive cancer with significant variation in incidence based on geographic factors. Previous studies have highlighted cancer survival disparities between metropolitan and nonmetropolitan populations for other cancers; this data is largely unreported for PM. We aimed to compare incidence trends and cancer-specific survival (CSS) between metropolitan and nonmetropolitan areas in the United States using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database.
Methods: We analyzed SEER 18 registries for patients aged ≥ 20 diagnosed with PM between 2004 and 2021. Incidence rates, CSS, and demographic and clinical characteristics were compared between metropolitan and nonmetropolitan areas. Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) were calculated using the Tiwari method. Joinpoint regression was used to assess temporal trends, while Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard models analyzed survival outcomes.
Results: A total of 8519 PM cases were identified, with 89.3% in metropolitan areas. Nonmetropolitan patients were more likely to be non-Hispanic Black and had lower chemotherapy (p = 0.031) and surgery (p < 0.001) rates. The incidence rate in metropolitan areas declined from 1.4 in 2004 to 0.8 in 2021, while nonmetropolitan areas saw a stable incidence until 2017, followed by a decline to 0.5 in 2021. Metropolitan areas had significantly higher CSS, with 50.3% 1-year CSS by 2020, compared to 27.7% in nonmetropolitan areas. Multivariate analysis indicated a higher hazard of death in nonmetropolitan areas (HR = 1.18, p < 0.001).
Conclusion: Significant disparities in PM outcomes between metropolitan and nonmetropolitan areas were revealed. Although both regions experienced a decline in incidence over time, survival outcomes remained worse in nonmetropolitan areas. Patients in nonmetropolitan areas were also less likely to receive chemotherapy and surgery, further contributing to the survival gap. These findings highlight the need for targeted interventions to improve treatment access and enhance survival for nonmetropolitan patients with PM.
{"title":"Trends in Pleural Mesothelioma Incidence and Survival in Metropolitan and Nonmetropolitan Areas in the United States.","authors":"Alexander J Didier, Charlotte Lennox, Mingjia Li, Jinesh Gheeya, Asrar Alahmadi, Jacob Kaufman, Regan Memmott, Kai He, Peter Shields, Christian Rolfo, David P Carbone, Carolyn Presley, Dwight Owen, Logan Roof","doi":"10.1002/cam4.71474","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cam4.71474","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pleural mesothelioma (PM) is a rare, aggressive cancer with significant variation in incidence based on geographic factors. Previous studies have highlighted cancer survival disparities between metropolitan and nonmetropolitan populations for other cancers; this data is largely unreported for PM. We aimed to compare incidence trends and cancer-specific survival (CSS) between metropolitan and nonmetropolitan areas in the United States using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed SEER 18 registries for patients aged ≥ 20 diagnosed with PM between 2004 and 2021. Incidence rates, CSS, and demographic and clinical characteristics were compared between metropolitan and nonmetropolitan areas. Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) were calculated using the Tiwari method. Joinpoint regression was used to assess temporal trends, while Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard models analyzed survival outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 8519 PM cases were identified, with 89.3% in metropolitan areas. Nonmetropolitan patients were more likely to be non-Hispanic Black and had lower chemotherapy (p = 0.031) and surgery (p < 0.001) rates. The incidence rate in metropolitan areas declined from 1.4 in 2004 to 0.8 in 2021, while nonmetropolitan areas saw a stable incidence until 2017, followed by a decline to 0.5 in 2021. Metropolitan areas had significantly higher CSS, with 50.3% 1-year CSS by 2020, compared to 27.7% in nonmetropolitan areas. Multivariate analysis indicated a higher hazard of death in nonmetropolitan areas (HR = 1.18, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Significant disparities in PM outcomes between metropolitan and nonmetropolitan areas were revealed. Although both regions experienced a decline in incidence over time, survival outcomes remained worse in nonmetropolitan areas. Patients in nonmetropolitan areas were also less likely to receive chemotherapy and surgery, further contributing to the survival gap. These findings highlight the need for targeted interventions to improve treatment access and enhance survival for nonmetropolitan patients with PM.</p>","PeriodicalId":139,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Medicine","volume":"14 24","pages":"e71474"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12704024/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145754878","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jordyn A Brown, Taylor D Ellington, Leah Moubadder, Maya Bliss, Anjali D Kumar, Chantel L Martin, Laura Farnan, Adrian Gerstel, Lauren E McCullough, Hazel B Nichols
Background: Historical and contemporary mortgage lending practices have been associated with worse cancer outcomes. We estimated the association between mortgage loan denial risk and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) among survivors at a large tertiary medical center in North Carolina (NC).
Methods: Mortgage denial risk, calculated using Home Mortgage Disclosure Act data (2010-2014), was linked by census tract to UNC Cancer Survivorship Cohort survivors who resided within NC metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs). HRQoL was measured using the validated Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G). Differences in well-being across seven MSAs were assessed using Pearson chi-square tests and modified Poisson regression models adjusted for demographic and socioeconomic characteristics.
Results: Over 40% of survivors reported low overall well-being, while more than one-third of survivors reported low physical, social, emotional, or functional well-being. FACT-G scores were 6.2 (95% CI: 1.5, 10.9) points lower among Greensboro survivors; 4.1 (95% CI: 0.1, 8.1) points lower among Fayetteville MSA survivors; and 9.6 (95% CI: 2.5, 16.8) points lower among Charlotte survivors at a higher risk for mortgage loan denial compared to those at lower risk. Racial differences in FACT-G scores were only observed among Greensboro and Charlotte MSA survivors, whereas sex differences were limited to Charlotte survivors.
Conclusions: Mortgage loan denial was associated with worse overall HRQoL in Greensboro, Fayetteville, and Charlotte, but not in other NC MSAs. Further investigation into the role of place in other NC MSAs is needed to identify opportunities to support survivors across the cancer control continuum.
{"title":"Contemporary Area-Level Mortgage Loan Denial Risk and Health-Related Quality of Life Among Cancer Survivors.","authors":"Jordyn A Brown, Taylor D Ellington, Leah Moubadder, Maya Bliss, Anjali D Kumar, Chantel L Martin, Laura Farnan, Adrian Gerstel, Lauren E McCullough, Hazel B Nichols","doi":"10.1002/cam4.71433","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cam4.71433","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Historical and contemporary mortgage lending practices have been associated with worse cancer outcomes. We estimated the association between mortgage loan denial risk and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) among survivors at a large tertiary medical center in North Carolina (NC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Mortgage denial risk, calculated using Home Mortgage Disclosure Act data (2010-2014), was linked by census tract to UNC Cancer Survivorship Cohort survivors who resided within NC metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs). HRQoL was measured using the validated Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G). Differences in well-being across seven MSAs were assessed using Pearson chi-square tests and modified Poisson regression models adjusted for demographic and socioeconomic characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over 40% of survivors reported low overall well-being, while more than one-third of survivors reported low physical, social, emotional, or functional well-being. FACT-G scores were 6.2 (95% CI: 1.5, 10.9) points lower among Greensboro survivors; 4.1 (95% CI: 0.1, 8.1) points lower among Fayetteville MSA survivors; and 9.6 (95% CI: 2.5, 16.8) points lower among Charlotte survivors at a higher risk for mortgage loan denial compared to those at lower risk. Racial differences in FACT-G scores were only observed among Greensboro and Charlotte MSA survivors, whereas sex differences were limited to Charlotte survivors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Mortgage loan denial was associated with worse overall HRQoL in Greensboro, Fayetteville, and Charlotte, but not in other NC MSAs. Further investigation into the role of place in other NC MSAs is needed to identify opportunities to support survivors across the cancer control continuum.</p>","PeriodicalId":139,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Medicine","volume":"14 24","pages":"e71433"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12710087/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145766630","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Angelique Quartier, Ahmed Y. Sanin, Julia Nagelschmitz, Justine Schneider, Wenjie Shi, Thomas Wartmann, Maximilian Dölling, Frederike Stelter, Mihailo Andric, Roland S. Croner, Pierre Eftekhari, Ulf D. Kahlert