首页 > 最新文献

Law. Human. Environment最新文献

英文 中文
Foreigners and stateless individuals as subjects of administrative proceedings 作为行政诉讼对象的外国人和无国籍个人
Pub Date : 2021-11-11 DOI: 10.31548/law2021.04.15
Anzor Saadulaev
The right to appeal to a court, including an administrative one, is one of the key rights of citizens guaranteed by the Constitution and laws of Ukraine. Apart from the general constitutional right to judicial protection, Article 7 of the Law of Ukraine No. 1402-VIII “On the Judiciary and the Status of Judges” dated June 2, 2016, guarantees everyone the protection of their rights, freedoms, and interests within a reasonable time by an independent, impartial, and fair court established by law. Considering the relevance of this study, its purpose was to establish the main reasons for improper recognition of the legal status of all participants in administrative proceedings at the legislative level. The study used a set of methods and techniques of scientific cognition. The principal ones are as follows: the dialectical method, which determines the essence and content of the administrative legal status of Ukrainian citizens, foreign citizens, and stateless individuals; the comparative legal method, with the application of which the Ukrainian and foreign regulatory framework governing the status of foreign citizens and stateless individuals were compared; the formal legal method, which, together the method of logical analysis, allowed comprehensively investigating the modern system of legal norms that establish administrative procedural legal personality and the procedure for citizens and subjects of authority to exercise their rights and duties in an administrative court; the logical-semantic method allowed developing proposals for improving the legislation of Ukraine in the field of administrative proceedings. It was stated that access to justice for every person is ensured according to the Constitution of Ukraine and according to the procedure established by the laws of Ukraine. However, along with the guaranteed right to appeal to the court of foreigners, stateless individuals (refugees, migrants, immigrants), such a category of subjects of administrative proceedings as stateless individuals stayed outside the limits of Ukrainian legislation. The paper considered the administrative legal status of Ukrainian citizens, foreign citizens, and stateless individuals as subjects of administrative proceedings. To eliminate the shortcomings of the legislative regulation of the legal status of stateless individuals in Ukraine, the author concluded that it is necessary to eliminate the existing deficiency by amending the Law of Ukraine No. 3773-V “On the Legal Status of Foreigners and Stateless Individuals” dated September 22, 2011. The practical value of the obtained results is that the theoretical propositions, conclusions, and proposals formulated in the article can be used: in the research field (for further developments aimed at investigating the issues of administrative justice in Ukraine), in the law-making field (to improve the current legislation of Ukraine), in the field of law enforcement (to improve the activities of administrative courts, state
向法院(包括行政法院)上诉的权利是乌克兰宪法和法律保障的公民的主要权利之一。除了获得司法保护的一般宪法权利外,2016年6月2日乌克兰第1402-VIII号法律“关于司法和法官地位”第7条保障每个人在合理时间内由依法设立的独立,公正和公平的法院保护其权利,自由和利益。考虑到这项研究的相关性,其目的是确定立法一级不适当承认行政诉讼中所有参与人的法律地位的主要原因。本研究采用了一套科学认知的方法和技术。主要有:辨证法,确定乌克兰公民、外国公民和无国籍个人行政法律地位的实质和内容;比较法律方法,对乌克兰和外国关于外国公民和无国籍个人地位的管理框架的适用情况进行了比较;形式法方法与逻辑分析方法相结合,全面考察了确立行政程序法律人格的现代法律规范体系以及公民和权力主体在行政法院行使权利和义务的程序;逻辑-语义方法可以为改进乌克兰在行政诉讼领域的立法提出建议。有人指出,根据《乌克兰宪法》和乌克兰法律规定的程序,确保每个人都有诉诸司法的机会。但是,除了保证向外国人、无国籍个人(难民、移民、移民)法院提出上诉的权利外,诸如无国籍个人这一类的行政诉讼对象仍然不在乌克兰立法的范围之内。该文件考虑了乌克兰公民、外国公民和无国籍个人作为行政诉讼主体的行政法律地位。为了消除乌克兰无国籍个人法律地位立法规定的不足,笔者认为有必要通过修改2011年9月22日乌克兰第3773-V号法“关于外国人和无国籍个人的法律地位”来消除现有的不足。所得结果的实用价值在于本文提出的理论命题、结论和建议可以应用:在研究领域(为进一步发展旨在调查乌克兰行政司法问题),在立法领域(改善乌克兰现行立法),在执法领域(改善行政法院,国家行政机关,地方自治机构的活动),在与确保个人和法人实体的权利,自由和合法利益有关的领域。
{"title":"Foreigners and stateless individuals as subjects of administrative proceedings","authors":"Anzor Saadulaev","doi":"10.31548/law2021.04.15","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31548/law2021.04.15","url":null,"abstract":"The right to appeal to a court, including an administrative one, is one of the key rights of citizens guaranteed by the Constitution and laws of Ukraine. Apart from the general constitutional right to judicial protection, Article 7 of the Law of Ukraine No. 1402-VIII “On the Judiciary and the Status of Judges” dated June 2, 2016, guarantees everyone the protection of their rights, freedoms, and interests within a reasonable time by an independent, impartial, and fair court established by law. Considering the relevance of this study, its purpose was to establish the main reasons for improper recognition of the legal status of all participants in administrative proceedings at the legislative level. The study used a set of methods and techniques of scientific cognition. The principal ones are as follows: the dialectical method, which determines the essence and content of the administrative legal status of Ukrainian citizens, foreign citizens, and stateless individuals; the comparative legal method, with the application of which the Ukrainian and foreign regulatory framework governing the status of foreign citizens and stateless individuals were compared; the formal legal method, which, together the method of logical analysis, allowed comprehensively investigating the modern system of legal norms that establish administrative procedural legal personality and the procedure for citizens and subjects of authority to exercise their rights and duties in an administrative court; the logical-semantic method allowed developing proposals for improving the legislation of Ukraine in the field of administrative proceedings. It was stated that access to justice for every person is ensured according to the Constitution of Ukraine and according to the procedure established by the laws of Ukraine. However, along with the guaranteed right to appeal to the court of foreigners, stateless individuals (refugees, migrants, immigrants), such a category of subjects of administrative proceedings as stateless individuals stayed outside the limits of Ukrainian legislation. The paper considered the administrative legal status of Ukrainian citizens, foreign citizens, and stateless individuals as subjects of administrative proceedings. To eliminate the shortcomings of the legislative regulation of the legal status of stateless individuals in Ukraine, the author concluded that it is necessary to eliminate the existing deficiency by amending the Law of Ukraine No. 3773-V “On the Legal Status of Foreigners and Stateless Individuals” dated September 22, 2011. The practical value of the obtained results is that the theoretical propositions, conclusions, and proposals formulated in the article can be used: in the research field (for further developments aimed at investigating the issues of administrative justice in Ukraine), in the law-making field (to improve the current legislation of Ukraine), in the field of law enforcement (to improve the activities of administrative courts, state","PeriodicalId":142294,"journal":{"name":"Law. Human. Environment","volume":"78 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114526493","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
International legal guarantees for the exercise of the human and civil right to environmental information 国际法律保障人权和公民环境知情权的行使
Pub Date : 2021-11-08 DOI: 10.31548/law2021.04.08
A. Butsmak
This paper raises an urgent issue of securing guarantees for the exercise of the right to access information on the state of the environment in international legal documents. Accordingly, the purpose of this paper is aimed at coverage and analysis of international legal norms that establish guarantees for the exercise of human and civil rights to environmental information, as well as access to information about the activities of state authorities. The method for investigating this issue is to analyse the current national legislation, which suggests that international legal norms meet their conditions in national regulations. The presentation of the general material includes the normative content of international legal documents that directly or indirectly relate to the implementation of the right of human and citizen to information and establish guarantees for the exercise of the right to environmental information, as well as the importance of media in covering the activities of state authorities. This paper analyses the state of exercise of such international norms in national legislation. Certain legal guarantees for the exercise of the right to receive environmental information are investigated. Examples of protection of the violated right of access to environmental information are given. To exercise the right to information, it is important not only to have the norms consolidated in the legislation, but also to have a system of guarantees and opportunities for their implementation, which should be provided by public authorities. International legal instruments establish only general approaches to the protection of rights, and their further development and consolidation is undoubtedly the responsibility of national bodies. However, over time, approaches to understanding environmental information, expanding its list, and subjects who have the right to receive it change, and therefore work in this area should continue for a wider opportunity to exercise the right of access to such information. The materials of this paper are of practical value for persons who were denied or made difficult in any form to obtain the desired information, having the right to do so per Article 50 of the Constitution of Ukraine, which stipulates that every person is guaranteed the right to free access to information about the state of the environment.
本文提出了一个迫切需要解决的问题,即如何在国际法律文件中保障获取环境状况信息的权利。因此,本文的目的在于涵盖和分析国际法律规范,这些规范为行使获得环境信息的人权和公民权利以及获得有关国家当局活动的信息提供保障。研究这一问题的方法是分析目前的国家立法,表明国际法律规范在国家条例中符合其条件。一般材料的介绍包括直接或间接与人权和公民知情权的实施有关的国际法律文件的规范性内容,并为行使环境知情权建立保障,以及媒体在报道国家当局活动中的重要性。本文分析了这些国际规范在国家立法中的运用状况。对环境信息知情权行使的法律保障进行了探讨。列举了受侵犯的环境信息获取权的保护实例。为了行使获得信息的权利,重要的是不仅要在立法中巩固这些规范,而且要有一种保障和执行这些规范的机会制度,这些制度应由公共当局提供。国际法律文书只规定了保护权利的一般办法,它们的进一步发展和巩固无疑是国家机构的责任。但是,随着时间的推移,理解环境信息、扩大环境信息清单和有权接收环境信息的对象的方法发生了变化,因此,这一领域的工作应继续进行,以便有更广泛的机会行使获取环境信息的权利。本文的材料对那些以任何形式被拒绝或难以获得所需信息的人具有实用价值,根据乌克兰宪法第50条,他们有权这样做,该条规定,保证每个人都有权自由获得有关环境状况的信息。
{"title":"International legal guarantees for the exercise of the human and civil right to environmental information","authors":"A. Butsmak","doi":"10.31548/law2021.04.08","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31548/law2021.04.08","url":null,"abstract":"This paper raises an urgent issue of securing guarantees for the exercise of the right to access information on the state of the environment in international legal documents. Accordingly, the purpose of this paper is aimed at coverage and analysis of international legal norms that establish guarantees for the exercise of human and civil rights to environmental information, as well as access to information about the activities of state authorities. The method for investigating this issue is to analyse the current national legislation, which suggests that international legal norms meet their conditions in national regulations. The presentation of the general material includes the normative content of international legal documents that directly or indirectly relate to the implementation of the right of human and citizen to information and establish guarantees for the exercise of the right to environmental information, as well as the importance of media in covering the activities of state authorities. This paper analyses the state of exercise of such international norms in national legislation. Certain legal guarantees for the exercise of the right to receive environmental information are investigated. Examples of protection of the violated right of access to environmental information are given. To exercise the right to information, it is important not only to have the norms consolidated in the legislation, but also to have a system of guarantees and opportunities for their implementation, which should be provided by public authorities. International legal instruments establish only general approaches to the protection of rights, and their further development and consolidation is undoubtedly the responsibility of national bodies. However, over time, approaches to understanding environmental information, expanding its list, and subjects who have the right to receive it change, and therefore work in this area should continue for a wider opportunity to exercise the right of access to such information. The materials of this paper are of practical value for persons who were denied or made difficult in any form to obtain the desired information, having the right to do so per Article 50 of the Constitution of Ukraine, which stipulates that every person is guaranteed the right to free access to information about the state of the environment.","PeriodicalId":142294,"journal":{"name":"Law. Human. Environment","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123695233","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Breeding achievement in animal breeding as an object of intellectual property law and international experience of its protection 育种成果以动物育种为对象的知识产权法及其保护的国际经验
Pub Date : 2021-11-08 DOI: 10.31548/law2021.04.13
I. Horislavska, O. Piddubnyi
Intellectual property rights are prescribed in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. A patent for an animal breed is the exclusive right of the inventor to its breeding achievement, it is a legal monopoly ensured by the state, and patent protection makes it impossible to use it commercially without the consent of its owner. The modern-day challenges are directly related to ensuring food security. The practical application of breeding achievements in animal husbandry lies in the genetic improvement of animals in the “economic aspect”, which directly affects the level of investment and remuneration for breeders, and from this the need for effective legal protection of intellectual property rights increases. In this regard, the purpose of this paper was to investigate the legal regulation of intellectual property rights for breeding achievements in animal husbandry, proposals for its improvement through the study of international practices. During this study, philosophical, general scientific and special legal methods of scientific cognition were used, which were chosen considering the purpose and objectives of this study. Based on the analysis of regulations governing the procedure for obtaining legal protection of breeding achievements in animal husbandry, the paper examines problematic positions and suggests ways to eliminate conflicts in the legal regulation of these issues. The international practices regarding the execution of law enforcement documents for breeders and the possibility of protecting their rights was also analysed. The materials of this paper are of practical value for further investments, improvements, and identification of new issues in research of breeding achievements in animal husbandry.
《世界人权宣言》规定了知识产权。动物品种专利是发明人对其育种成果的专有权,是国家依法保证的垄断性权利,受到专利保护,未经权利人同意,不得用于商业用途。当今的挑战与确保粮食安全直接相关。育种成果在畜牧业中的实际应用在于“经济方面”对动物的遗传改良,这直接影响到育种者的投入水平和报酬,由此增加了对知识产权进行有效法律保护的必要性。为此,本文旨在探讨我国畜牧业育种成果知识产权的法律规制,并通过对国际实践的研究提出完善建议。在本研究中,考虑到本研究的目的和目标,选择了哲学、一般科学和特殊法律的科学认知方法。本文通过对我国畜牧业育种成果法律保护程序规定的分析,探讨了我国畜牧业育种成果法律保护中存在的问题,并提出了消除矛盾的途径。还分析了关于为育种者执行执法文件的国际惯例和保护其权利的可能性。本文的资料对畜牧业育种成果研究的进一步投入、改进和新问题的发现具有实用价值。
{"title":"Breeding achievement in animal breeding as an object of intellectual property law and international experience of its protection","authors":"I. Horislavska, O. Piddubnyi","doi":"10.31548/law2021.04.13","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31548/law2021.04.13","url":null,"abstract":"Intellectual property rights are prescribed in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. A patent for an animal breed is the exclusive right of the inventor to its breeding achievement, it is a legal monopoly ensured by the state, and patent protection makes it impossible to use it commercially without the consent of its owner. The modern-day challenges are directly related to ensuring food security. The practical application of breeding achievements in animal husbandry lies in the genetic improvement of animals in the “economic aspect”, which directly affects the level of investment and remuneration for breeders, and from this the need for effective legal protection of intellectual property rights increases. In this regard, the purpose of this paper was to investigate the legal regulation of intellectual property rights for breeding achievements in animal husbandry, proposals for its improvement through the study of international practices. During this study, philosophical, general scientific and special legal methods of scientific cognition were used, which were chosen considering the purpose and objectives of this study. Based on the analysis of regulations governing the procedure for obtaining legal protection of breeding achievements in animal husbandry, the paper examines problematic positions and suggests ways to eliminate conflicts in the legal regulation of these issues. The international practices regarding the execution of law enforcement documents for breeders and the possibility of protecting their rights was also analysed. The materials of this paper are of practical value for further investments, improvements, and identification of new issues in research of breeding achievements in animal husbandry.","PeriodicalId":142294,"journal":{"name":"Law. Human. Environment","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114180284","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Problems of legal forms of management in the agricultural sector 农业部门管理的法律形式问题
Pub Date : 2021-11-07 DOI: 10.31548/law2021.04.06
S. Marchenko, T. Novak
The subject of this paper was the analysis of individual issues of legal forms of management in the agricultural sector. The purpose of this study was to identify and characterize the main trends in the development of legal forms, analyse the problems of legal forms of agricultural production and formulate proposals for their solution. During the study, the main trends in the development of legal forms of Ukraine in the aspect of business deregulation and the opening of the agricultural land market were identified. The role and significance, types, legislative, and doctrinal approaches to determining the legal form of agricultural production were also covered. Based on the analysis of legal literature, national legislation and the practice of its application, the problems of certain legal forms of agricultural production (farms, collective agricultural enterprises, etc.) were analysed. According to the results of this paper, it was found that the principle of equal forms of ownership and management in agriculture is violated in Ukraine. Priority of practical importance is the definition and legislative approval of legal forms of land production because this will contribute to the choice of the form of conducting business in the agricultural sector from categories. The materials of this paper can be of practical value for further researchers, as well as act as an essential resource as a solution to a relevant issue that was presented in the subject of this paper.
本文的主题是分析农业部门经营法律形式的个别问题。这项研究的目的是确定和描述法律形式发展的主要趋势,分析农业生产法律形式的问题,并拟订解决这些问题的建议。在研究过程中,确定了乌克兰在商业放松管制和农业土地市场开放方面法律形式发展的主要趋势。还讨论了确定农业生产法律形式的作用和意义、类型、立法和理论途径。通过对法律文献、国家立法及其应用实践的分析,分析了某些农业生产法律形式(农场、集体农业企业等)存在的问题。根据本文的研究结果,发现乌克兰违反了农业所有权和经营形式平等的原则。具有实际重要性的优先事项是确定和立法批准土地生产的法律形式,因为这将有助于从类别中选择开展农业部门业务的形式。本文的材料可以为进一步的研究人员提供实用价值,以及作为解决本文主题中提出的相关问题的重要资源。
{"title":"Problems of legal forms of management in the agricultural sector","authors":"S. Marchenko, T. Novak","doi":"10.31548/law2021.04.06","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31548/law2021.04.06","url":null,"abstract":"The subject of this paper was the analysis of individual issues of legal forms of management in the agricultural sector. The purpose of this study was to identify and characterize the main trends in the development of legal forms, analyse the problems of legal forms of agricultural production and formulate proposals for their solution. During the study, the main trends in the development of legal forms of Ukraine in the aspect of business deregulation and the opening of the agricultural land market were identified. The role and significance, types, legislative, and doctrinal approaches to determining the legal form of agricultural production were also covered. Based on the analysis of legal literature, national legislation and the practice of its application, the problems of certain legal forms of agricultural production (farms, collective agricultural enterprises, etc.) were analysed. According to the results of this paper, it was found that the principle of equal forms of ownership and management in agriculture is violated in Ukraine. Priority of practical importance is the definition and legislative approval of legal forms of land production because this will contribute to the choice of the form of conducting business in the agricultural sector from categories. The materials of this paper can be of practical value for further researchers, as well as act as an essential resource as a solution to a relevant issue that was presented in the subject of this paper.","PeriodicalId":142294,"journal":{"name":"Law. Human. Environment","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130769163","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Problematic issues of preventing and countering domestic violence by the prosecutor’s office 检察官办公室预防和打击家庭暴力的问题
Pub Date : 2021-11-06 DOI: 10.31548/law2021.04.16
O. Yara, N. Stasiuk
In modern realities, the issue of combating and preventing domestic violence is crucial, since many women and children become victims of such violence, and there are cases of domestic violence against men as well. Proceeding from the relevance of this paper, its subject lies in determining the role of the prosecutor’s office in preventing and countering domestic violence, which involves an analysis of the content of its duties and powers in this area of activity. During the study, the method of analysis and synthesis, the empirical method, and the comparison method were applied. This paper considered the issue of the role of prosecutor’s offices in preventing and countering domestic violence. The problems of legislative regulation of prosecutor’s activities in the system of preventing and countering domestic violence were also investigated. This is a common issue primarily because the norms of the current legislation do not clearly regulate what actions prosecutors can prevent or counteract domestic violence, because their powers include the direct procedural support of such criminal cases, i.e., after such violence has already occurred. In conclusion, it was noted that for the prosecutor’s office to effectively prevent and counteract domestic violence, it is necessary to amend Article 131-1 of the Constitution of Ukraine, which defines the functions of the prosecutor’s office in general, and the prosecutor in particular. It is advisable to supplement this Article with a part that would grant the prosecutor’s office the right to take measures to prevent and counteract domestic violence. The study conducted in this paper can form the basis of legislative activity upon adopting amendments to legislative acts governing legal relations in the field of preventing and countering domestic violence.
在现代现实中,打击和防止家庭暴力的问题至关重要,因为许多妇女和儿童成为这种暴力的受害者,而且也存在对男子的家庭暴力案件。从本文的相关性出发,其主题在于确定检察官办公室在预防和打击家庭暴力方面的作用,这涉及分析其在这一活动领域的职责和权力的内容。在研究过程中,采用了分析综合法、实证法和比较法。本文审议了检察官办公室在预防和打击家庭暴力方面的作用问题。对预防和打击家庭暴力系统中检察官活动的立法规制问题也进行了探讨。这是一个共同的问题,主要是因为目前的立法规范没有明确规定检察官可以采取什么行动预防或抵制家庭暴力,因为他们的权力包括对这种刑事案件的直接程序支助,即在这种暴力已经发生之后。最后,有人指出,为了使检察官办公室有效地预防和对付家庭暴力,有必要修改《乌克兰宪法》第131-1条,该条规定了检察官办公室的一般职能,特别是检察官的职能。明智的做法是在本条的基础上增加一个部分,赋予检察官办公室采取措施预防和打击家庭暴力的权利。本文所进行的研究可以作为立法活动的基础,通过对有关预防和打击家庭暴力领域法律关系的立法行为的修正案。
{"title":"Problematic issues of preventing and countering domestic violence by the prosecutor’s office","authors":"O. Yara, N. Stasiuk","doi":"10.31548/law2021.04.16","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31548/law2021.04.16","url":null,"abstract":"In modern realities, the issue of combating and preventing domestic violence is crucial, since many women and children become victims of such violence, and there are cases of domestic violence against men as well. Proceeding from the relevance of this paper, its subject lies in determining the role of the prosecutor’s office in preventing and countering domestic violence, which involves an analysis of the content of its duties and powers in this area of activity. During the study, the method of analysis and synthesis, the empirical method, and the comparison method were applied. This paper considered the issue of the role of prosecutor’s offices in preventing and countering domestic violence. The problems of legislative regulation of prosecutor’s activities in the system of preventing and countering domestic violence were also investigated. This is a common issue primarily because the norms of the current legislation do not clearly regulate what actions prosecutors can prevent or counteract domestic violence, because their powers include the direct procedural support of such criminal cases, i.e., after such violence has already occurred. In conclusion, it was noted that for the prosecutor’s office to effectively prevent and counteract domestic violence, it is necessary to amend Article 131-1 of the Constitution of Ukraine, which defines the functions of the prosecutor’s office in general, and the prosecutor in particular. It is advisable to supplement this Article with a part that would grant the prosecutor’s office the right to take measures to prevent and counteract domestic violence. The study conducted in this paper can form the basis of legislative activity upon adopting amendments to legislative acts governing legal relations in the field of preventing and countering domestic violence.","PeriodicalId":142294,"journal":{"name":"Law. Human. Environment","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124271514","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Administrative responsibility for offences related to expert activity in Ukraine 与乌克兰境内专家活动有关的罪行的行政责任
Pub Date : 2021-11-05 DOI: 10.31548/law2021.04.14
L. Hbur, O. Artemenko
One of the crucial means of establishing the truth in cases of administrative offences is expertise. As evidenced by judicial practice, the explanations of the individuals involved in the case are quite often contradictory, and only by appointing and conducting a forensic examination it is possible to establish certain circumstances of the case that require the use of special knowledge, which the court must evaluate accordingly. The purpose of this study was a comprehensive analysis of administrative responsibility for violating the procedure for conducting and organizing expert examinations in Ukraine. The principal methods for investigating this issue were the functional method, the logical analysis approach, and the synthesis method. The paper examined the specific features of administrative responsibility for offences related to the sphere of expert activity. It was found that the organization and conduct of expertise, as a basic category of expert activity, usually does not require the involvement of a wide range of people. However, the concept of expertise is not always limited only to forensic expertise, which is usually appointed based on a corresponding decision of a court or other authorized body. It was found that expert activity is not defined at the level of a separate legislative act, and therefore there are difficulties in forming general categories for understanding the essence of such a concept. In general, regulations define the requirements for experts, the stated expert opinions, the rights and obligations of experts, as well as responsibility for violating the procedure for conducting expert examinations. That is, the regulations mainly relate to the conduct of forensic expertise, as one of the components of expert activity. Furthermore, the current Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offences does not contain any administrative legal norms concerning administrative liability for offences that may arise in expert activity in general and forensic examinations in particular. It was concluded that the priority actions aimed at improving the institution of administrative responsibility for offences related to the field of expert activity in Ukraine should be as follows: firstly, the field of organization and conduct of non-judicial expertise requires legislative definition and statutory regulation; secondly, considering the fact that the current Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offences does not contain any administrative legal norm that concerns responsibility for offences related to the field of expert activity, namely the implementation of judicial and non-judicial examinations, it is necessary to amend the current Article 185-16 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of Administrative Offences with the following wording: “Violation of the procedure for conducting examinations by authorized individuals entails the imposition of a fine of one to two hundred minimum tax-free wages of citizens”. The materials of this paper are of pract
在行政犯罪案件中,认定事实真相的重要手段之一是专家鉴定。司法实践证明,与案件有关的个人的解释往往是相互矛盾的,只有通过指定和进行法医检查,才有可能确定案件的某些情况,需要使用专门知识,法院必须据此进行评估。这项研究的目的是全面分析违反在乌克兰进行和组织专家检查程序的行政责任。研究这一问题的主要方法是功能分析法、逻辑分析法和综合分析法。该文件审查了与专家活动领域有关的罪行的行政责任的具体特征。研究发现,作为专家活动的一个基本类别,专家知识的组织和开展通常不需要广泛的人员参与。但是,专门知识的概念并不总是仅限于法医专门知识,法医专门知识通常是根据法院或其他授权机构的相应决定任命的。研究发现,专家活动没有在单独的立法行为一级加以界定,因此很难形成一般类别,以便了解这一概念的实质。一般来说,条例规定了对专家的要求、所陈述的专家意见、专家的权利和义务以及违反专家审查程序的责任。也就是说,条例主要涉及作为专家活动组成部分之一的法医专门知识的行为。此外,现行的《乌克兰行政违法法典》没有任何关于一般专家活动特别是法医检查中可能产生的违法行为的行政责任的行政法律规范。结论是,旨在改善乌克兰境内与专家活动领域有关的罪行的行政责任制度的优先行动应如下:首先,非司法专门知识的组织和行为领域需要立法定义和法规;第二,考虑到现行的《乌克兰行政犯罪法典》没有包含任何涉及与专家活动领域有关的犯罪责任的行政法律规范,即实施司法和非司法考试,因此有必要修改现行的《行政犯罪刑事诉讼法》第185-16条,措词如下:“违反授权人员进行检查的程序将处以公民最低免税工资一百至二百元的罚款”。本文所提供的材料对于后续研究、解决乌克兰行政违法法典中存在的问题和寻找不足具有一定的实用价值。
{"title":"Administrative responsibility for offences related to expert activity in Ukraine","authors":"L. Hbur, O. Artemenko","doi":"10.31548/law2021.04.14","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31548/law2021.04.14","url":null,"abstract":"One of the crucial means of establishing the truth in cases of administrative offences is expertise. As evidenced by judicial practice, the explanations of the individuals involved in the case are quite often contradictory, and only by appointing and conducting a forensic examination it is possible to establish certain circumstances of the case that require the use of special knowledge, which the court must evaluate accordingly. The purpose of this study was a comprehensive analysis of administrative responsibility for violating the procedure for conducting and organizing expert examinations in Ukraine. The principal methods for investigating this issue were the functional method, the logical analysis approach, and the synthesis method. The paper examined the specific features of administrative responsibility for offences related to the sphere of expert activity. It was found that the organization and conduct of expertise, as a basic category of expert activity, usually does not require the involvement of a wide range of people. However, the concept of expertise is not always limited only to forensic expertise, which is usually appointed based on a corresponding decision of a court or other authorized body. It was found that expert activity is not defined at the level of a separate legislative act, and therefore there are difficulties in forming general categories for understanding the essence of such a concept. In general, regulations define the requirements for experts, the stated expert opinions, the rights and obligations of experts, as well as responsibility for violating the procedure for conducting expert examinations. That is, the regulations mainly relate to the conduct of forensic expertise, as one of the components of expert activity. Furthermore, the current Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offences does not contain any administrative legal norms concerning administrative liability for offences that may arise in expert activity in general and forensic examinations in particular. It was concluded that the priority actions aimed at improving the institution of administrative responsibility for offences related to the field of expert activity in Ukraine should be as follows: firstly, the field of organization and conduct of non-judicial expertise requires legislative definition and statutory regulation; secondly, considering the fact that the current Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offences does not contain any administrative legal norm that concerns responsibility for offences related to the field of expert activity, namely the implementation of judicial and non-judicial examinations, it is necessary to amend the current Article 185-16 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of Administrative Offences with the following wording: “Violation of the procedure for conducting examinations by authorized individuals entails the imposition of a fine of one to two hundred minimum tax-free wages of citizens”. The materials of this paper are of pract","PeriodicalId":142294,"journal":{"name":"Law. Human. Environment","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122911281","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Principles of legal regulation of bioenergy use in the European Union 欧盟生物能源使用的法律监管原则
Pub Date : 2021-11-01 DOI: 10.31548/law2021.04.09
Svitlana Holub, N. Shinkaruk
The relevance of the study is determined by raising and solving the issue of regulation of such a field of energy as bioenergy in the legal field of the European Union. The main purpose of this paper was to investigate the specific features of legal norms for the use of bioenergy in the European Union, to identify the available problems and prospects, possible ways to improve EU legal norms in this area, which are also subject to application in the Ukrainian legal system. The author paid attention to the new provisions that were implemented in connection with the adoption of Directive 2018/2001. The leading methods for studying this problem were the following: functional approach, logical analysis method, synthesis method, deduction method, etc. The impact of these provisions on the energy sector of the European Union and on the environment of its member states in general has also been investigated in sufficient detail. Special attention is paid to the positions of scientists and the recent lawsuit regarding the adoption of Directive 2018/2001. The paper examines the specific features of the legal regulation of bioenergy in the European Union, analyses the concept of bioenergy and biofuels in Ukrainian and European legislation, and highlights the main provisions of the European Union directives concerning the promotion of the use of energy produced from renewable sources, including biomass. It was found that in the EU, bioenergy is the leading source of renewable energy for heating and cooling (88% of all renewable energy sources), which is 16% of the total European final energy consumption in this sector. Therefore, considering the demand and need for the use of such a resource, the EU legislative framework contains a number of principles and visions for regulating relations in the field of production, circulation, and disposal of waste from biofuels as the main raw material for bioenergy. The fundamental principles in the EU legislation on the use of bioenergy include, firstly, the principle of sustainable production and consumption of biomass, secondly, prevention regarding the reduction of adverse consequences when using this resource, and thirdly, increasing the share of use of alternative energy sources to 75% of final energy consumption by 2050. The materials of this paper are of practical value for scientists and researchers who could conduct their research solving the problem of using bioenergy and give preference to other energy sources.
该研究的相关性是通过在欧盟法律领域提出和解决对生物能源等能源领域的监管问题来确定的。本文的主要目的是调查欧盟使用生物能源的法律规范的具体特征,以确定可用的问题和前景,可能的方法来改善欧盟在这一领域的法律规范,这也适用于乌克兰的法律制度。作者注意到了与2018/2001号指令的通过有关的新规定。研究这一问题的主要方法有:泛函法、逻辑分析法、综合法、演绎法等。这些规定对欧洲联盟能源部门及其成员国一般环境的影响也进行了足够详细的调查。特别关注科学家的立场和最近关于通过2018/2001号指令的诉讼。本文考察了欧盟生物能源法律法规的具体特点,分析了乌克兰和欧洲立法中生物能源和生物燃料的概念,并强调了欧盟关于促进使用包括生物质在内的可再生能源的指令的主要规定。研究发现,在欧盟,生物能源是供暖和制冷可再生能源的主要来源(占所有可再生能源的88%),占该领域欧洲最终能源消耗总量的16%。因此,考虑到使用这种资源的需求和需要,欧盟立法框架包含了一些原则和愿景,以规范作为生物能源主要原材料的生物燃料的生产、流通和废物处理领域的关系。欧盟关于生物能源使用的立法的基本原则包括:首先,可持续生产和消费生物质的原则;其次,防止在使用这种资源时减少不利后果;第三,到2050年,将替代能源的使用份额增加到最终能源消耗的75%。本文的材料对科学家和研究人员进行解决生物能源利用问题和优先考虑其他能源的研究具有实用价值。
{"title":"Principles of legal regulation of bioenergy use in the European Union","authors":"Svitlana Holub, N. Shinkaruk","doi":"10.31548/law2021.04.09","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31548/law2021.04.09","url":null,"abstract":"The relevance of the study is determined by raising and solving the issue of regulation of such a field of energy as bioenergy in the legal field of the European Union. The main purpose of this paper was to investigate the specific features of legal norms for the use of bioenergy in the European Union, to identify the available problems and prospects, possible ways to improve EU legal norms in this area, which are also subject to application in the Ukrainian legal system. The author paid attention to the new provisions that were implemented in connection with the adoption of Directive 2018/2001. The leading methods for studying this problem were the following: functional approach, logical analysis method, synthesis method, deduction method, etc. The impact of these provisions on the energy sector of the European Union and on the environment of its member states in general has also been investigated in sufficient detail. Special attention is paid to the positions of scientists and the recent lawsuit regarding the adoption of Directive 2018/2001. The paper examines the specific features of the legal regulation of bioenergy in the European Union, analyses the concept of bioenergy and biofuels in Ukrainian and European legislation, and highlights the main provisions of the European Union directives concerning the promotion of the use of energy produced from renewable sources, including biomass. It was found that in the EU, bioenergy is the leading source of renewable energy for heating and cooling (88% of all renewable energy sources), which is 16% of the total European final energy consumption in this sector. Therefore, considering the demand and need for the use of such a resource, the EU legislative framework contains a number of principles and visions for regulating relations in the field of production, circulation, and disposal of waste from biofuels as the main raw material for bioenergy. The fundamental principles in the EU legislation on the use of bioenergy include, firstly, the principle of sustainable production and consumption of biomass, secondly, prevention regarding the reduction of adverse consequences when using this resource, and thirdly, increasing the share of use of alternative energy sources to 75% of final energy consumption by 2050. The materials of this paper are of practical value for scientists and researchers who could conduct their research solving the problem of using bioenergy and give preference to other energy sources.","PeriodicalId":142294,"journal":{"name":"Law. Human. Environment","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116292668","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Problems of land law in the research of Kharkiv jurists of the 1920s 20世纪20年代哈尔科夫法学家研究中的土地法问题
Pub Date : 2021-09-16 DOI: 10.31548/law2021.03.001
Mikhnevych Liudmyla, Yermolenko Iryna
The article draws attention to the little-studied field of historical and legal science, which is the question of the origin, formation and development of the science of land law in Ukraine. The relevance of this area of research from the point of view of the possibility of finding already existing in the past options for solving modern land law problems is emphasized. It is stated that the presented article makes it possible to achieve at least two tasks, the first of which is the analysis of theoretical views on the problems of land law of Kharkiv jurists of the 1920s, and the second – the introduction of little-known scientific papers on this issue, which allows to reproduce contemporary legal research in the field of land law. The scientific achievements of Kharkiv scientists, which are L.S. Dubinsky, O.L. Malitsky, M.F. Matvievsky, O.M. Odarchenko, S.E. Sabinin. Most of their scientific works are little known in both historical and legal and land law sciences. The analysis of the presented publications is an important basis for the conclusion about the existence in the 1920s of the Kharkiv center of the science of land law, which became the basis for the further formation of the relevant scientific school. Keywords: land law, history of land law, science of land law, history of science of land law, Kharkiv school of land law
本文关注的是历史学和法学研究较少的领域,即乌克兰土地法科学的起源、形成和发展问题。从找到解决现代土地法问题的过去已经存在的备选办法的可能性的角度来看,强调了这一研究领域的相关性。有人指出,本文至少可以完成两项任务,第一项任务是分析20世纪20年代哈尔科夫法学家对土地法问题的理论观点,第二项任务是介绍关于这个问题的鲜为人知的科学论文,从而可以再现土地法领域的当代法律研究。哈尔科夫科学家的科学成就,他们是L.S.杜宾斯基,O.L.马利茨基,M.F.马特维耶夫斯基,O.M.奥达尔琴科,S.E.萨比宁。他们的大部分科学著作在历史学、法学和土地学中都是鲜为人知的。对这些文献的分析是得出20世纪20年代哈尔科夫土地法科学中心存在的结论的重要依据,进而成为相关科学学派进一步形成的基础。关键词:土地法,土地法史,土地法科学,土地法科学史,哈尔科夫土地法学派
{"title":"Problems of land law in the research of Kharkiv jurists of the 1920s","authors":"Mikhnevych Liudmyla, Yermolenko Iryna","doi":"10.31548/law2021.03.001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31548/law2021.03.001","url":null,"abstract":"The article draws attention to the little-studied field of historical and legal science, which is the question of the origin, formation and development of the science of land law in Ukraine. The relevance of this area of research from the point of view of the possibility of finding already existing in the past options for solving modern land law problems is emphasized. It is stated that the presented article makes it possible to achieve at least two tasks, the first of which is the analysis of theoretical views on the problems of land law of Kharkiv jurists of the 1920s, and the second – the introduction of little-known scientific papers on this issue, which allows to reproduce contemporary legal research in the field of land law. The scientific achievements of Kharkiv scientists, which are L.S. Dubinsky, O.L. Malitsky, M.F. Matvievsky, O.M. Odarchenko, S.E. Sabinin. Most of their scientific works are little known in both historical and legal and land law sciences. The analysis of the presented publications is an important basis for the conclusion about the existence in the 1920s of the Kharkiv center of the science of land law, which became the basis for the further formation of the relevant scientific school. Keywords: land law, history of land law, science of land law, history of science of land law, Kharkiv school of land law","PeriodicalId":142294,"journal":{"name":"Law. Human. Environment","volume":"464 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115868668","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Subcategory of land as an important element of the conceptual apparatus of land law science 土地子范畴是土地法科学概念装置的重要组成部分
Pub Date : 2021-09-16 DOI: 10.31548/law2021.03.010
Mazii Vitalii
This article is devoted to the insufficiently studied in the theory of land law the concept of «subcategory of lands». The author established the fact that despite the widespread use of the phrase «subcategory of lands» by domestic and foreign scientists, there are no studies aimed at revealing this concept and outlining the same subcategories of lands. In the course of the research it was established that the current land legislation has about 119 subcategories of land, which are within different categories of land. Using the methods of theoretical and legal science, an attempt was made to reveal the concept of «subcategory of lands» and give it an appropriate definition. It is stated that subcategories of land play an important role in the proper functioning of current land legislation of our state, the lack of allocation and proper legal regulation of subcategories of land can lead to mass violations (intentional or negligent) in the use of land for its intended purpose. To effectively address the issue of proper legal regulation of land subcategories, the author analyzed the successful experience of the United States on this issue and proposed the development of a legal act that could perfectly regulate the relevant land categories, establish a full classification of major categories and subcategories. Lands, as well as provide them with a detailed description. In the final stage of the study, the author emphasizes that there is an urgent need to pay due attention to this issue by lawmakers, scholars and practitioners. Keywords: subcategory of lands, category of lands, division of lands into subcategories, purpose of lands, land legislation
本文对土地法理论中研究不足的“土地子范畴”概念进行了探讨。作者确定的事实是,尽管国内外科学家广泛使用“土地子类别”一词,但没有研究旨在揭示这一概念并概述相同的土地子类别。在研究过程中发现,目前的土地立法有大约119个土地子类别,这些土地子类别属于不同的土地类别。运用理论和法学的方法,试图揭示“土地子范畴”的概念,并对其进行适当的界定。土地子类别在我国现行土地立法的正常运作中发挥着重要作用,缺乏对土地子类别的分配和适当的法律监管可能导致土地在其预期用途上的大规模违规(故意或疏忽)。为有效解决土地小类别的法律规制问题,笔者分析了美国在这一问题上的成功经验,提出制定一项法律法案,对相关土地类别进行完善的规制,建立完整的主要类别和小类别分类。土地,并提供详细的描述。在研究的最后阶段,作者强调,迫切需要立法者、学者和从业者对这一问题给予应有的重视。关键词:土地子类,土地类别,土地子类划分,土地用途,土地立法
{"title":"Subcategory of land as an important element of the conceptual apparatus of land law science","authors":"Mazii Vitalii","doi":"10.31548/law2021.03.010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31548/law2021.03.010","url":null,"abstract":"This article is devoted to the insufficiently studied in the theory of land law the concept of «subcategory of lands». The author established the fact that despite the widespread use of the phrase «subcategory of lands» by domestic and foreign scientists, there are no studies aimed at revealing this concept and outlining the same subcategories of lands. In the course of the research it was established that the current land legislation has about 119 subcategories of land, which are within different categories of land. Using the methods of theoretical and legal science, an attempt was made to reveal the concept of «subcategory of lands» and give it an appropriate definition. It is stated that subcategories of land play an important role in the proper functioning of current land legislation of our state, the lack of allocation and proper legal regulation of subcategories of land can lead to mass violations (intentional or negligent) in the use of land for its intended purpose. To effectively address the issue of proper legal regulation of land subcategories, the author analyzed the successful experience of the United States on this issue and proposed the development of a legal act that could perfectly regulate the relevant land categories, establish a full classification of major categories and subcategories. Lands, as well as provide them with a detailed description. In the final stage of the study, the author emphasizes that there is an urgent need to pay due attention to this issue by lawmakers, scholars and practitioners. Keywords: subcategory of lands, category of lands, division of lands into subcategories, purpose of lands, land legislation","PeriodicalId":142294,"journal":{"name":"Law. Human. Environment","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115406592","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Legal regulation of utilization non-suitable pesticides accumulated during the USSR 苏联时期积累的对不适宜农药使用的法律规定
Pub Date : 2021-09-16 DOI: 10.31548/law2021.03.006
Hafurova Olena, Kukhar Olga
The article provides a scientific and theoretical analysis of the legislation of the USSR, Ukrainian legislation. Particular attention is paid to establishing features in the legal regulation of seizure, utilization, destruction and disposal of unusable or prohibited pesticides and agrochemicals and containers from them. The authors conclude that today, given the need to improve the environment, more efforts are needed at the state level to utilize pesticides accumulated during the Soviet era, primarily to approve the state program with clear measures for its implementation and sources of funding. Today, regional state administrations have the opportunity without the intervention of the Ministry of Environmental Protection and Natural Resources of Ukraine to solve problems with obsolete pesticides and agrochemicals, as well as to determine where it is most profitable to dispose of these substances. Thus, to date, the process of reducing unusable pesticides has been launched. It aims to improve the ecological situation in the country, help reduce the negative impact on people's lives and health, and allow agriculture to develop. Keywords: waste, industrial waste, pesticides, plants protecting products, utilization of pesticides, container, agriculture
本文对苏联、乌克兰的立法进行了科学的理论分析。特别注意在没收、使用、销毁和处置不能使用或禁止使用的农药和农用化学品及其容器的法律条例中确立特点。作者的结论是,今天,考虑到改善环境的需要,需要在国家层面上做出更多的努力来利用苏联时代积累的农药,主要是批准国家计划,并明确实施措施和资金来源。今天,在没有乌克兰环境保护和自然资源部干预的情况下,地区国家行政当局有机会解决过时农药和农用化学品的问题,并确定在何处处置这些物质最有利可图。因此,迄今为止,减少不可用农药的进程已经启动。它旨在改善该国的生态状况,帮助减少对人民生活和健康的负面影响,并使农业得以发展。关键词:废弃物,工业废弃物,农药,植保产品,农药利用,集装箱,农业
{"title":"Legal regulation of utilization non-suitable pesticides accumulated during the USSR","authors":"Hafurova Olena, Kukhar Olga","doi":"10.31548/law2021.03.006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31548/law2021.03.006","url":null,"abstract":"The article provides a scientific and theoretical analysis of the legislation of the USSR, Ukrainian legislation. Particular attention is paid to establishing features in the legal regulation of seizure, utilization, destruction and disposal of unusable or prohibited pesticides and agrochemicals and containers from them. The authors conclude that today, given the need to improve the environment, more efforts are needed at the state level to utilize pesticides accumulated during the Soviet era, primarily to approve the state program with clear measures for its implementation and sources of funding. Today, regional state administrations have the opportunity without the intervention of the Ministry of Environmental Protection and Natural Resources of Ukraine to solve problems with obsolete pesticides and agrochemicals, as well as to determine where it is most profitable to dispose of these substances. Thus, to date, the process of reducing unusable pesticides has been launched. It aims to improve the ecological situation in the country, help reduce the negative impact on people's lives and health, and allow agriculture to develop. Keywords: waste, industrial waste, pesticides, plants protecting products, utilization of pesticides, container, agriculture","PeriodicalId":142294,"journal":{"name":"Law. Human. Environment","volume":"107 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116362159","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Law. Human. Environment
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1