<p>An estimated 1:500 children are diagnosed with cancer each year.<span><sup>1</sup></span> When assessed on a global scale, there is a higher incidence of childhood cancer in countries of a high human development index (HDI), compared to that of a low development index (LDI).<span><sup>2</sup></span></p><p>In the UK, all children are treated at designated specialist Principal Treatment Centres (PTC), including Royal Manchester Children's Hospital (RMCH), to standardise clinical care and follow-up.<span><sup>3</sup></span> Approximately 120 new malignant disease diagnoses are seen per year at RMCH from across the region, all of whom require a range of treatment modalities including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, proton beam therapy, stem cell transplant and surgical management.<span><sup>4</sup></span></p><p>The Royal College of Surgeons England has recommended that all children diagnosed with cancer should have access to dental care, including a full initial assessment with radiographs at time of diagnosis, before commencement of treatment.<span><sup>4</sup></span> Paediatric dental units working with oncology centres should have a mechanism of notification for new patients.<span><sup>5</sup></span></p><p>During oncology treatment, oral care can become neglected with changes in oral health routines, particularly for children undergoing inpatient treatments.<span><sup>6</sup></span> Additional nutritional intake requirements and oral manifestations such as mucositis and opportunistic infections further impact oral health and increase caries risk. Poor oral health can adversely impact oncology treatment, increasing morbidity risk and length of inpatient hospital stays.<span><sup>3</sup></span> Furthermore, long-term oral complications following curative cancer treatments may require specialist-led care for oral rehabilitation in future.</p><p>Following an urgent general anaesthetic procedure for a child receiving cancer treatment with severe dental decay, it became apparent that not all newly diagnosed oncology patients at RMCH were referred for a baseline dental assessment at time of diagnosis. Analysis of the previous month highlighted multiple urgent ward visits for dental assessments for patients in pain who were unknown to the department and had not seen a dental practitioner for assessment prior to commencing cancer treatment. This highlighted a clinical need to improve dental care for this cohort, and thus provided stimulus for this quality improvement project which was conducted using the Plan-Do-Study Act (PDSA) model.</p><p>Improvements were made in each PDSA cycle for referral of children to the DHU at the point of cancer diagnosis, with an overall improvement of 48%. With 90% (<i>n</i> = 36) of children referred in Cycle 3, this improvement was felt to be supported by the integration of direct electronic referral into the new Trust wide electronic record system (Epic™). Previous cycles required an electronic document referral to be sent
{"title":"Oral health assessment of newly diagnosed oncology patients—Who are we missing?","authors":"L. Roocroft, C. Dixon, A. Shepherd, C. Hood","doi":"10.1111/ipd.13246","DOIUrl":"10.1111/ipd.13246","url":null,"abstract":"<p>An estimated 1:500 children are diagnosed with cancer each year.<span><sup>1</sup></span> When assessed on a global scale, there is a higher incidence of childhood cancer in countries of a high human development index (HDI), compared to that of a low development index (LDI).<span><sup>2</sup></span></p><p>In the UK, all children are treated at designated specialist Principal Treatment Centres (PTC), including Royal Manchester Children's Hospital (RMCH), to standardise clinical care and follow-up.<span><sup>3</sup></span> Approximately 120 new malignant disease diagnoses are seen per year at RMCH from across the region, all of whom require a range of treatment modalities including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, proton beam therapy, stem cell transplant and surgical management.<span><sup>4</sup></span></p><p>The Royal College of Surgeons England has recommended that all children diagnosed with cancer should have access to dental care, including a full initial assessment with radiographs at time of diagnosis, before commencement of treatment.<span><sup>4</sup></span> Paediatric dental units working with oncology centres should have a mechanism of notification for new patients.<span><sup>5</sup></span></p><p>During oncology treatment, oral care can become neglected with changes in oral health routines, particularly for children undergoing inpatient treatments.<span><sup>6</sup></span> Additional nutritional intake requirements and oral manifestations such as mucositis and opportunistic infections further impact oral health and increase caries risk. Poor oral health can adversely impact oncology treatment, increasing morbidity risk and length of inpatient hospital stays.<span><sup>3</sup></span> Furthermore, long-term oral complications following curative cancer treatments may require specialist-led care for oral rehabilitation in future.</p><p>Following an urgent general anaesthetic procedure for a child receiving cancer treatment with severe dental decay, it became apparent that not all newly diagnosed oncology patients at RMCH were referred for a baseline dental assessment at time of diagnosis. Analysis of the previous month highlighted multiple urgent ward visits for dental assessments for patients in pain who were unknown to the department and had not seen a dental practitioner for assessment prior to commencing cancer treatment. This highlighted a clinical need to improve dental care for this cohort, and thus provided stimulus for this quality improvement project which was conducted using the Plan-Do-Study Act (PDSA) model.</p><p>Improvements were made in each PDSA cycle for referral of children to the DHU at the point of cancer diagnosis, with an overall improvement of 48%. With 90% (<i>n</i> = 36) of children referred in Cycle 3, this improvement was felt to be supported by the integration of direct electronic referral into the new Trust wide electronic record system (Epic™). Previous cycles required an electronic document referral to be sent ","PeriodicalId":14268,"journal":{"name":"International journal of paediatric dentistry","volume":"34 S1","pages":"59-62"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ipd.13246","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142140040","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
<p>During the COVID-19 pandemic, the National Health Service (NHS) had to adapt and innovate in ways to provide clinical care. A traditional healthcare model, where patients travel to a clinical building for their care, or a clinician travelled to the patients' home, was not possible. Instead, many Trusts established or expanded virtual ways of providing care; the patient and clinician connect remotely, via telephone, video call, or written communication.</p><p>Beyond the pandemic, virtual clinics and wards have become a routine part of NHS healthcare, with benefits for patients, staff, and the environment.<span><sup>1</sup></span></p><p>Dental procedures cannot be carried out virtually, so in this paper we refer to appointments that are for assessment, treatment planning, or review. In the speciality of paediatric dentistry, where patients have rapidly evolving dentitions and undergo rapid change, there is a high need for these types of appointments.</p><p>The aim of this paper is to highlight different formats of virtual clinics that are relevant to the field of paediatric dentistry, using example cases and quality improvement data from the virtual clinics at the Eastman Dental Hospital.</p><p>Virtual clinics can take many forms, and the value of different clinic types may depend on the case-mix for each paediatric dentistry service. All virtual clinics can be conducted in a clinical room, in a non-clinical room, or remotely.</p><p>For any appointment or interaction, appropriate patient documentation will need to be completed, such as clinical notes, letters, requesting follow up appointments, coding, and recording the referral-to-treat outcome. The authors also suggest asking parents to send in patient photographs in advance of a virtual clinic, as this aids the diagnostic value of the appointment.</p><p>For the sake of simplicity, the term ‘parent’ is used to refer to the adult most likely to accompany the patient and have parental responsibility. This is not the case for every patient, and so the term ‘parent’ should be substituted with the appropriate adult(s) for each child or young person.</p><p>Virtual working can have benefits for patients, parents, and staff. They are also associated with less costs both financially and environmentally. Admittedly, except for A&G, they require a similar amount of time as face-to-face appointments.</p><p>When planning a virtual clinic, a clear standard operating procedure should be written, and all stakeholders included to identify the important issues to be managed. This could include personnel, funding, administrative support, as well as the physical location and hardware required to run the virtual service. Each part of the pathway should be assessed from referrer to clinician to hospital capacity. The virtual service must fit in with the existing clinical service, recognising the clinical and administrative time needed.</p><p>Once this is in place, then clear guidance should be produced so that
{"title":"Virtual clinics in paediatric dentistry","authors":"Alexandra Lyne, Joe Noar","doi":"10.1111/ipd.13245","DOIUrl":"10.1111/ipd.13245","url":null,"abstract":"<p>During the COVID-19 pandemic, the National Health Service (NHS) had to adapt and innovate in ways to provide clinical care. A traditional healthcare model, where patients travel to a clinical building for their care, or a clinician travelled to the patients' home, was not possible. Instead, many Trusts established or expanded virtual ways of providing care; the patient and clinician connect remotely, via telephone, video call, or written communication.</p><p>Beyond the pandemic, virtual clinics and wards have become a routine part of NHS healthcare, with benefits for patients, staff, and the environment.<span><sup>1</sup></span></p><p>Dental procedures cannot be carried out virtually, so in this paper we refer to appointments that are for assessment, treatment planning, or review. In the speciality of paediatric dentistry, where patients have rapidly evolving dentitions and undergo rapid change, there is a high need for these types of appointments.</p><p>The aim of this paper is to highlight different formats of virtual clinics that are relevant to the field of paediatric dentistry, using example cases and quality improvement data from the virtual clinics at the Eastman Dental Hospital.</p><p>Virtual clinics can take many forms, and the value of different clinic types may depend on the case-mix for each paediatric dentistry service. All virtual clinics can be conducted in a clinical room, in a non-clinical room, or remotely.</p><p>For any appointment or interaction, appropriate patient documentation will need to be completed, such as clinical notes, letters, requesting follow up appointments, coding, and recording the referral-to-treat outcome. The authors also suggest asking parents to send in patient photographs in advance of a virtual clinic, as this aids the diagnostic value of the appointment.</p><p>For the sake of simplicity, the term ‘parent’ is used to refer to the adult most likely to accompany the patient and have parental responsibility. This is not the case for every patient, and so the term ‘parent’ should be substituted with the appropriate adult(s) for each child or young person.</p><p>Virtual working can have benefits for patients, parents, and staff. They are also associated with less costs both financially and environmentally. Admittedly, except for A&G, they require a similar amount of time as face-to-face appointments.</p><p>When planning a virtual clinic, a clear standard operating procedure should be written, and all stakeholders included to identify the important issues to be managed. This could include personnel, funding, administrative support, as well as the physical location and hardware required to run the virtual service. Each part of the pathway should be assessed from referrer to clinician to hospital capacity. The virtual service must fit in with the existing clinical service, recognising the clinical and administrative time needed.</p><p>Once this is in place, then clear guidance should be produced so that ","PeriodicalId":14268,"journal":{"name":"International journal of paediatric dentistry","volume":"34 S1","pages":"52-58"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ipd.13245","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142140042","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
I am pleased to share with you this 4th edition of the BSPD Quality Improvement Briefing, which includes a collection of novel quality improvement projects in paediatric dentistry. This year's invited article on ‘Virtual clinics in paediatric dentistry’ has been authored by two leading innovators and experts in the area: Alexendra Lyne and Joe Noar. This excellent paper will provide a practical guide to setting up virtual clinics and advise on the use of quality improvement projects to continuously improve the standard of patient care in this format.
Once again, I am grateful to the many authors who submitted papers on a range of topics demonstrating their commitment to quality improvement. My heartfelt thanks to all our reviewers who kindly provided their time and expertise to deliver a comprehensive peer review for the papers submitted: Clarissa Dale, Carly Dixon, Chris Donnell, Maryam Ezzeldin, Julia Hurry, Clare Hutchison, Shrita Lakhani, Jessica Large, Emma Morgan, Rachel Osborne, Charlotte Schofield, Jessica Talbot, Laura Timms, Chris Wallace and Scott Wright.
I am thankful to my deputy editor Armaana Ahmad and assistant editor Claudia Heggie for their continued enthusiasm, support and commitment; producing this publication is truly a team effort. As my term as the editor if the Quality Improvement Briefing now comes to an end, I wish Armaana every success as she takes on this role. I am confident that the publication will continue to flourish and develop under her leadership in the coming years.
I hope you find enjoyment and value in reading this edition of the Quality Improvement Briefing.