{"title":"Beyond Libido and Mood: Toward a Circadian and Metabolic Perspective on Testosterone Regulation","authors":"Yu-Hsiang Lin, Jau-Yuan Chen, Chien-Lun Chen","doi":"10.1111/iju.70300","DOIUrl":"10.1111/iju.70300","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14323,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Urology","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145596475","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
<p>Transurethral resection of the prostate remains a cornerstone surgical therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia; however, postoperative urinary tract infection (UTI) and urosepsis continue to pose challenges. The systematic review and network meta-analysis by Oliveira et al. address the important clinical issue of determining optimal antimicrobial prophylaxis regimens to reduce postoperative infectious complications in this population [<span>1</span>]. By synthesizing randomized trials and indirect comparisons among multiple antimicrobial classes, their analysis demonstrates that prophylaxis markedly lowers postoperative bacteriuria, septicemia/bacteremia, fever, and length of stay compared with no antimicrobial use, with varying protective effects across antimicrobial classes depending on the outcome measured. Importantly, extending prophylaxis (> 72 h) did not provide consistent additional benefit and was associated with a nonsignificant trend toward higher septicemia/bacteremia risk, highlighting the importance of avoiding unnecessary antimicrobial exposure. This comprehensive work advances previous pairwise meta-analyses by ranking regimens through network methodology and clarifying that short perioperative regimens targeting common uropathogens achieve the best balance between efficacy and safety.</p><p>Beyond reinforcing the value of prophylaxis, this study highlights several stewardship-relevant insights. More intensive or prolonged regimens did not further reduce infection risk, supporting guideline-based minimalist approaches. Recent best practice guidelines recommend single-dose prophylaxis for most urologic procedures, with no additional postoperative dosing, citing no added benefit from extended regimens and a potential for increased antimicrobial resistance [<span>2</span>]. Moreover, the recent multicenter randomized trial suggested that, despite shorter antimicrobial prophylaxis application, microbiologically documented postoperative UTI rates tended to be lower and showed little difference between single-dose and multi-day regimens. While the study did not reach its planned sample size and cannot provide a confirmatory answer regarding noninferiority, the findings support the plausibility that prophylaxis duration could safely be reduced to the necessary minimum in transurethral prostate surgery [<span>3</span>].</p><p>In Oliveira et al.'s meta-analysis, variation in infection definitions and resistance reporting across the included trials limits the generalizability of the findings to modern practice, where multidrug-resistant organisms are becoming increasingly prevalent. A further consideration involves preoperative asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB), which was not addressed in the meta-analysis but remains clinically relevant. Recent data in the holmium laser enucleation of prostate, another major transurethral surgery, suggest that untreated ASB does not increase postoperative UTI or urosepsis, suggesting doubts about the n
经尿道前列腺切除术仍然是良性前列腺增生的基石手术治疗;然而,术后尿路感染(UTI)和尿脓毒症继续构成挑战。Oliveira等人的系统综述和网络荟萃分析解决了确定最佳抗菌预防方案以减少该人群术后感染并发症的重要临床问题[10]。通过综合随机试验和多种抗菌素的间接比较,他们的分析表明,与不使用抗菌素相比,预防可显著降低术后菌尿、败血症/菌血症、发烧和住院时间,不同抗菌素类别的保护作用因测量结果而异。重要的是,延长预防(72小时)并没有提供一致的额外益处,并且与败血症/菌血症风险升高的不显著趋势相关,这突出了避免不必要的抗菌药物暴露的重要性。这项全面的工作通过网络方法对方案进行排名,并阐明针对常见尿路病原体的短期围手术期方案在疗效和安全性之间取得了最佳平衡,从而推进了之前的两两荟萃分析。除了强调预防的价值之外,本研究还强调了一些与管理相关的见解。更强化或更长时间的治疗方案没有进一步降低感染风险,支持基于指南的最低限度治疗方法。最近的最佳实践指南建议在大多数泌尿外科手术中使用单剂量预防,术后不增加剂量,理由是延长治疗方案没有额外的益处,而且可能增加抗菌素耐药性。此外,最近的多中心随机试验表明,尽管抗菌素预防应用时间较短,但微生物记录的术后尿路感染发生率往往较低,单剂量和多日方案之间差异不大。虽然这项研究没有达到计划的样本量,也不能提供关于非效性的确认性答案,但研究结果支持了预防持续时间可以安全地减少到经尿道前列腺手术所需的最低限度的可能性。在Oliveira等人的荟萃分析中,在纳入的试验中,感染定义和耐药性报告的差异限制了研究结果在现代实践中的普遍性,在现代实践中,多重耐药生物正变得越来越普遍。进一步的考虑涉及术前无症状细菌尿(ASB),这在meta分析中没有得到解决,但仍具有临床相关性。另一种主要经尿道手术——钬激光前列腺切除术的最新数据表明,未经治疗的ASB不会增加术后尿路感染或尿脓毒症,这表明在这些经尿道手术前普遍治疗的必要性受到质疑[10]。目前欧洲泌尿外科协会的指南建议在进行破粘膜泌尿外科手术前筛查和治疗ASB,并强调根据个体风险和局部耐药数据进行定制治疗[10]。虽然Oliveira等人提供了一个有价值的预防策略排名,但临床医生应该在抗菌药物管理框架内解释这些结果——根据机构抗生素图选择药物,将持续时间限制在单一术前剂量,并避免不必要的广谱暴露。持续的管理工作和精心设计的前瞻性试验对于完善预防政策至关重要,确保在不加速普通经尿道前列腺手术抗菌素耐药性的情况下预防感染。关户孝典:构思,写作-原稿,平川秀田:写作-审查和编辑,田平拓哉:写作-审查和编辑。作者声明无利益冲突。Alessandro V. Oliveira等人。经尿道前列腺切除术男性的抗生素预防:系统回顾和网络荟萃分析。Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.70276。
{"title":"Editorial Comment on Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Men Undergoing Transurethral Resection of Prostate: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis","authors":"Takanori Sekito, Hidetada Hirakawa, Takuya Sadahira","doi":"10.1111/iju.70295","DOIUrl":"10.1111/iju.70295","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Transurethral resection of the prostate remains a cornerstone surgical therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia; however, postoperative urinary tract infection (UTI) and urosepsis continue to pose challenges. The systematic review and network meta-analysis by Oliveira et al. address the important clinical issue of determining optimal antimicrobial prophylaxis regimens to reduce postoperative infectious complications in this population [<span>1</span>]. By synthesizing randomized trials and indirect comparisons among multiple antimicrobial classes, their analysis demonstrates that prophylaxis markedly lowers postoperative bacteriuria, septicemia/bacteremia, fever, and length of stay compared with no antimicrobial use, with varying protective effects across antimicrobial classes depending on the outcome measured. Importantly, extending prophylaxis (> 72 h) did not provide consistent additional benefit and was associated with a nonsignificant trend toward higher septicemia/bacteremia risk, highlighting the importance of avoiding unnecessary antimicrobial exposure. This comprehensive work advances previous pairwise meta-analyses by ranking regimens through network methodology and clarifying that short perioperative regimens targeting common uropathogens achieve the best balance between efficacy and safety.</p><p>Beyond reinforcing the value of prophylaxis, this study highlights several stewardship-relevant insights. More intensive or prolonged regimens did not further reduce infection risk, supporting guideline-based minimalist approaches. Recent best practice guidelines recommend single-dose prophylaxis for most urologic procedures, with no additional postoperative dosing, citing no added benefit from extended regimens and a potential for increased antimicrobial resistance [<span>2</span>]. Moreover, the recent multicenter randomized trial suggested that, despite shorter antimicrobial prophylaxis application, microbiologically documented postoperative UTI rates tended to be lower and showed little difference between single-dose and multi-day regimens. While the study did not reach its planned sample size and cannot provide a confirmatory answer regarding noninferiority, the findings support the plausibility that prophylaxis duration could safely be reduced to the necessary minimum in transurethral prostate surgery [<span>3</span>].</p><p>In Oliveira et al.'s meta-analysis, variation in infection definitions and resistance reporting across the included trials limits the generalizability of the findings to modern practice, where multidrug-resistant organisms are becoming increasingly prevalent. A further consideration involves preoperative asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB), which was not addressed in the meta-analysis but remains clinically relevant. Recent data in the holmium laser enucleation of prostate, another major transurethral surgery, suggest that untreated ASB does not increase postoperative UTI or urosepsis, suggesting doubts about the n","PeriodicalId":14323,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Urology","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/iju.70295","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145587387","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Editorial Comment to Benefits of Preemptive Living Kidney Transplantation: Reduced Rates of Cerebro-Cardiovascular Events and Neoplasm Development","authors":"Masayoshi Okumi","doi":"10.1111/iju.70296","DOIUrl":"10.1111/iju.70296","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14323,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Urology","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145587461","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}