International journal of surgery最新文献

Objective: This phase I clinical trial assessed the use of autologous nasal chondrocyte tissue-engineered cartilage (N-TEC) for functional repair of nasal septal perforations (NSP).

Background: The most widely used technique to treat NSP, namely interposition grafting with a polydioxanone (PDS) plate combined with a deep temporal fascia (DTF) graft, is still suboptimal towards patient satisfaction and revision rates.

Methods: Patients (n=5, all female, age range: 23-54 years) had a 0.5-2.0 cm diameter NSP. N-TEC was manufactured by expansion and 3D culture of autologous nasal septum chondrocytes into Chondro-Gide® collagen membranes. N-TEC was then shaped intraoperatively and enveloped in the harvested DTF before suturing it into the NSP. Safety (primary outcome) was assessed by the number of serious adverse reactions (SAR) until 12 months. Secondary outcomes included feasibility, assessed by surgical graft manipulation, and efficacy, assessed using subjective scoring (Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation, NOSE, and Visual Analogue Scale, VAS, scores) and objective breathing function tests. Structural closure of NSP after 12 months was defined using endoscopy and computed tomography (CT) scans.

Results: NSP treatment by N-TEC implantation was safe and feasible, as no SAR and no challenge in graft manipulation was recorded for any of the patients. One year postoperative, subjective scoring improved in all patients, unless already optimal (average improvement of 23 and 28.6 points out of 100 respectively for NOSE and VAS scores). Objective respiratory function overall confirmed - with the exception of one case - the observations above (average improvement of 172 ml/s). NSP were closed and the mucosae completely healed in three patients.

Conclusion: Autologous N-TEC is a valid treatment for NSP and warrants further clinical tests.

Background and aims: Hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) has been a long-standing intervention for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Despite positive clinical outcomes, its inclusion in guidelines remains limited due to a lack of evidence-based support. This study aims to identify optimal target populations for HAIC and validate associations between intermediate endpoints with overall survival (OS).

Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. The primary search strategy was based on medical subject headings terms (MeSH) using "Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy", "HAIC", "Sorafenib", "Nexavar", "hepatocellular carcinoma", "HCC", "Liver cancer", combined with free text words. Data extraction, quality assessment, and analysis were performed according to pre-registered protocol.

Results: A total of 26 studies, 6456 HCC patients were included for analysis (HAIC, n=2648; Sorafenib, n=3808). Pooled outcomes revealed that Sorafenib demonstrated better OS only in patients who were refractory to trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE) (HR=1.32,95%CI [1.01-1.73]), in other subgroups or overall HCC population HAIC consistently outperformed Sorafenib in patients' survival. Radiologically, higher response rates in the HAIC group does not necessarily translate into survival improvement, but the hazard ratios (HRs) of 1y-OS (R2=0.41, P=0.0044) and 1y-progression free survival (1y-PFS) (R2=0.77, P=0.0002) strongly correlated with the patients OS. Meanwhile, larger tumour size (HR=1.86,95%CI [1.12-3.1, 95%), heavier tumour burden (HR=2.32, 95%CI [1.33-4.02), existence of MVI or EHS (HR=1.65,95%CI[1.36-2]; HR=1.60,95%CI[1.19-2.14]), and AFP >400 ng/mL (HR=1.52, 95%CI [1.20-1.92]) were identified as independent risk factors for OS, while HAIC treatment (HR=0.54, 95%CI[0.35-0.82]) and lower BCLC stage (HR=0.44, 95%CI[0.28-0.69]) were potential protective factors for HCC patients.

Conclusion: HAIC monotherapy appears noninferior to Sorafenib in HCC treatment, with potential benefits in specific subgroups. The robust correlation between 1y-OS/1y-PFS and OS, alongside identified risk and protective factors from the present study, offers valuable insights for designing future large prospective studies in this field.

Objectives: To describe treatment patterns and prognoses for clear cell adenocarcinoma of the cervix (CCAC), a poorly understood rare tumor.

Methods: A retrospective case‒control study was conducted using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, focusing on females diagnosed with CCAC between 2000 and 2019. Kaplan‒Meier analysis, propensity score matching, Cox regression analysis, and subgroup analysis were used to assess treatment outcomes and risk factors.

Results: Of the 52,153 patients with cervical cancer in the SEER database, 528 had CCAC. Overall survival (OS) was worse for patients with early-stage and locally advanced CCAC disease, although no differences in survival were observed for patients with stage IVB disease compared to those with other histologies. In our investigation into treatment patterns, we have discovered that surgical treatment was the preferred choice for the majority of patients with locally advanced CCAC (58.5%). Further, Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that surgery improved OS in CCAC patients (65.6% vs. 25.3%, P=0.000), with similar results in locally advanced-stage patients (57.9% vs. 26.7%, P=0.000). Moreover, multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that surgery was significantly associated with a more favorable prognosis in CCAC patients with locally advanced disease (HR 0.299, 95% CI: 0.153-0.585, P=0.000). Consistent findings were observed following propensity score matching (HR 0.283, 95% CI: 0.106-0.751, P=0.011). According to the subgroup analyses, surgical intervention continued to show a beneficial effect on CCAC patients with locally advanced disease (HR=0.31, 95% CI 0.21-0.46, P<0.001). In particular, we also found that compared to patients who received primary radiotherapy (RT), those with CCAC who underwent radical surgery exhibited a significantly prolonged OS in locally advanced CCAC patients. Furthermore, multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that surgery was associated with better outcomes in patients with stage IB3-IIA2 and locally resectable stage IIIC patients (HR 0.207, 95% CI=0.043-0.991, P=0.049). However, this trend was not observed for patients with stage IIB-IVA (except locally resectable stage IIIC) CCAC.

Conclusion: Surgery should be considered the preferred treatment option for patients with locally advanced CCAC at stage IB3-IIA2 and locally resectable stage IIIC.

Background: Few studies have focused on the efficacy of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in treating early hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) for curative intention. This study aims to determine the best option among resection, ablation and SBRT in dealing with single HCC no more than 5 cm.

Materials and methods: This multicenter retrospective cohort study included 985 patients from 3 hospitals: 495, 335 and 155 in the resection, ablation and SBRT groups, respectively between January 2014 and December 2021. Subgroup analysis and propensity score matching (PSM) were performed.

Results: The SBRT group had unfavorable clinical features including larger tumor size, poorer liver function and more relapsed tumors. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year recurrence free survival (RFS) rates were 84.3%, 66.8% and 56.2% with resection, 73.3%, 49.8% and 37.2% with ablation and 73.2%, 56.4% and 53.6% with SBRT, respectively (P<0.001). The 3-year overall survival (OS) rates were 89.0%, 89.2% and 88.8% in the resection, ablation and SBRT group, respectively (P=0.590). The three modalities resulted in similar RFS and OS after adjusting for clinical factors. Resection provided ideal local tumor control, successively followed by SBRT and ablation. SBRT led to comparable RFS time compared to resection for tumors < 3 cm (HR=0.75, P=0.205), relapsed tumors (HR=0.83, P=0.420) and patients with poor liver function (HR=0.70, P=0.330). In addition, SBRT was superior to ablation regarding RFS when tumors were adjacent to intra-hepatic vessels (HR=0.64, P=0.031). SBRT were more minimally invasive, however, gastrointestinal disorders, hepatic inflammation and myelosuppression occurred more frequently.

Conclusion: All three approaches could be applied as curative options. Resection remains the best choice for preventing tumor recurrence, and SBRT showed advantages in treating small, recurrent and vascular-type lesions as well as patients with relatively poor liver function.

Background: Biliary disorders and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) frequently coexist. However, precise linkages between these conditions remain to be clarified.

Methods: Univariable Mendelian randomization (MR), Bayesian weighted MR (BWMR) along with multivariable MR approaches were conducted using genetic instruments to evaluate the causality involving biliary disorders and GERD. Furthermore, an investigation was conducted on the potential mediating roles of biliary disorders (or GERD), on the linkage involving body mass index (BMI) and GERD (or biliary disorders).

Results: Univariable MR analyses revealed significant causal effects of genetically predicted cholelithiasis (odds ratio (OR)=1.04, P=0.0001), cholecystitis (OR=1.06, P=0.0004), and cholecystectomy (OR=2.56, P=1.05×10-6) on GERD. These findings were replicated in the FinnGen cohort and were also confirmed by BWMR and multivariable MR analyses. Additionally, mediation analyses demonstrated that cholelithiasis and cholecystitis acted as partial mediators, linking BMI causally to GERD. Conversely, GERD exhibited causal effect on cholelithiasis (OR=1.52, P=9.17×10-30) and cholecystitis (OR=1.90, P=3.32×10-28), which remained significant after BWMR and multivariable MR analyses. Mediation analyses further revealed significant mediating effect of GERD on how BMI influenced cholelithiasis/cholecystitis.

Conclusion: Our study elucidates the bidirectional causal linkages involving cholelithiasis, cholecystitis, cholecystectomy, and GERD. These results highlight the significance of GERD risk assessment in individuals suffering from biliary diseases and vice versa.