Pub Date : 2025-01-07DOI: 10.1016/j.jacep.2024.10.031
Joshua Mayourian, Edward T O'Leary, John K Triedman, Rachel M Wald, Anne Marie Valente, Tal Geva
{"title":"Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Electrocardiogram Predicts Sudden Cardiac Death in Repaired Tetralogy of Fallot.","authors":"Joshua Mayourian, Edward T O'Leary, John K Triedman, Rachel M Wald, Anne Marie Valente, Tal Geva","doi":"10.1016/j.jacep.2024.10.031","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacep.2024.10.031","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14573,"journal":{"name":"JACC. Clinical electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142978430","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-07DOI: 10.1016/j.jacep.2024.11.002
Timothy M Markman, David S Frankel
{"title":"Site-Specific Ventricular Tachycardia Induction: It's All About Location, Location, Location.","authors":"Timothy M Markman, David S Frankel","doi":"10.1016/j.jacep.2024.11.002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacep.2024.11.002","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14573,"journal":{"name":"JACC. Clinical electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143005213","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-07DOI: 10.1016/j.jacep.2024.12.012
Tobias Skjelbred, Peder Emil Warming, Johanna Krøll, Mikkel Porsborg Andersen, Christian Torp-Pedersen, Bo Gregers Winkel, Jacob Tfelt-Hansen, Thomas Hadberg Lynge
Background: Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is a significant public health problem. Knowledge on SCD victims without a history of cardiovascular disease (CVD) is limited, presenting challenges for future prevention efforts.
Objectives: This study aims to examine the differences between SCD cases with and without a known history of CVD.
Methods: All Danish citizens were followed from January 1, 2010, until death or the end of the year. All deaths in Denmark during this period were reviewed by ≥1 medical doctor to identify cases of SCD. Data were analyzed from March 2023 until March 2024.
Results: A total of 6,851 SCD cases were identified, of which 3,046 (44.5%) had no history of CVD. Incidence rates of SCD increased with age and were higher in cases with a history of CVD across all age groups. The difference in SCD incidence between individuals with and without a history of CVD decreased with age, with incidence rate ratios ranging from 21.6 (95% CI: 5.2-66.7) in those aged 0 to 19 years to 1.8 (95% CI: 1.7-1.9) in those aged >90 years. Female sex and living alone were associated with a lower odds of having a CVD before SCD with ORs of 0.66 and 0.75, respectively.
Conclusions: The distribution of SCD cases is nearly equal between individuals with and without a history of CVD, although the risk remains higher in those with prior CVD. Future research should aim to uncover the distinct causes and mechanisms driving SCD in populations with a known CVD, as well as the general population.
{"title":"Sudden Cardiac Death as First Manifestation of Cardiovascular Disease: A Nationwide Study of 54,028 Deaths.","authors":"Tobias Skjelbred, Peder Emil Warming, Johanna Krøll, Mikkel Porsborg Andersen, Christian Torp-Pedersen, Bo Gregers Winkel, Jacob Tfelt-Hansen, Thomas Hadberg Lynge","doi":"10.1016/j.jacep.2024.12.012","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacep.2024.12.012","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is a significant public health problem. Knowledge on SCD victims without a history of cardiovascular disease (CVD) is limited, presenting challenges for future prevention efforts.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to examine the differences between SCD cases with and without a known history of CVD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All Danish citizens were followed from January 1, 2010, until death or the end of the year. All deaths in Denmark during this period were reviewed by ≥1 medical doctor to identify cases of SCD. Data were analyzed from March 2023 until March 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 6,851 SCD cases were identified, of which 3,046 (44.5%) had no history of CVD. Incidence rates of SCD increased with age and were higher in cases with a history of CVD across all age groups. The difference in SCD incidence between individuals with and without a history of CVD decreased with age, with incidence rate ratios ranging from 21.6 (95% CI: 5.2-66.7) in those aged 0 to 19 years to 1.8 (95% CI: 1.7-1.9) in those aged >90 years. Female sex and living alone were associated with a lower odds of having a CVD before SCD with ORs of 0.66 and 0.75, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The distribution of SCD cases is nearly equal between individuals with and without a history of CVD, although the risk remains higher in those with prior CVD. Future research should aim to uncover the distinct causes and mechanisms driving SCD in populations with a known CVD, as well as the general population.</p>","PeriodicalId":14573,"journal":{"name":"JACC. Clinical electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143364784","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-07DOI: 10.1016/j.jacep.2024.10.033
Jorge E Romero, Carlos D Matos, Fermin Garcia, Andres Enriquez, Luis Carlos Saenz, Carolina Hoyos, Isabella Alviz, Mohamed Gabr, Fernando Moreno, Carli Peters, Rafael H Isaac, Carlos Tapias, Eric D Braunstein, Alejandro Velasco, Matthew Hanson, Nathaniel Steiger, Bruce Koplan, Nestor Lopez-Cabanillas, Paul Zei, William H Sauer, Usha B Tedrow
Background: Postprocedural pericarditis (PP) can occur in up to 29.4% of patients undergoing epicardial catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT). Despite several proposed strategies to mitigate this adverse outcome, rates of PP and pericarditic pain remain high.
Objectives: This study sought to assess the impact of intrapericardial steroids instillation (ISI) combined with periprocedural colchicine on PP after epicardial VT ablation.
Methods: This prospective multicenter study included patients undergoing epicardial VT ablation between June 2021 and December 2023. The primary outcome was the occurrence of pericarditis, defined as the presence of pericarditic chest pain and pericarditic electrocardiographic (ECG) changes. Secondary outcomes included the pericarditic pain score at 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours after the procedure, pericardial effusion, postprocedural new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF), constrictive pericarditis, admission due to pericarditis, and gastrointestinal side effects. A systematic literature search was performed to identify historical control groups to compare with our cohort.
Results: A total of 129 patients underwent epicardial VT ablation with subsequent ISI and colchicine therapy. The combination of ISI and colchicine resulted in a nonsignificant trend of lower rates of pericarditis when compared with all historical control groups (3.1% [4 of 129] vs 7.0% [12 of 172]; P = 0.109) and a significant difference when compared to intrapericardial steroids (3.1% vs 13.2%; P = 0.030). The rates of pericarditic pain (10.9% [14 of 129] vs 30.9% [21 of 68]; P = 0.001), pericarditic ECG changes (5.4% [7 of 129] vs 33.8% [23 of 68]; P < 0.001) and new-onset atrial fibrillation (0.8% vs 19.5%; P = <0.001) were significantly lower in our study than in historical control groups.
Conclusions: The instillation of intrapericardial steroids along with periprocedural colchicine after epicardial VT ablation led to a decreased incidence of adverse effects associated with pericardial inflammation when compared with historical control groups. Further research with contemporary control groups is needed to confirm the suggested impact of the strategy described here.
{"title":"Intrapericardial Corticosteroids and Colchicine Prevent Pericarditis and Atrial Fibrillation After Epicardial Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias.","authors":"Jorge E Romero, Carlos D Matos, Fermin Garcia, Andres Enriquez, Luis Carlos Saenz, Carolina Hoyos, Isabella Alviz, Mohamed Gabr, Fernando Moreno, Carli Peters, Rafael H Isaac, Carlos Tapias, Eric D Braunstein, Alejandro Velasco, Matthew Hanson, Nathaniel Steiger, Bruce Koplan, Nestor Lopez-Cabanillas, Paul Zei, William H Sauer, Usha B Tedrow","doi":"10.1016/j.jacep.2024.10.033","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacep.2024.10.033","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postprocedural pericarditis (PP) can occur in up to 29.4% of patients undergoing epicardial catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT). Despite several proposed strategies to mitigate this adverse outcome, rates of PP and pericarditic pain remain high.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study sought to assess the impact of intrapericardial steroids instillation (ISI) combined with periprocedural colchicine on PP after epicardial VT ablation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective multicenter study included patients undergoing epicardial VT ablation between June 2021 and December 2023. The primary outcome was the occurrence of pericarditis, defined as the presence of pericarditic chest pain and pericarditic electrocardiographic (ECG) changes. Secondary outcomes included the pericarditic pain score at 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours after the procedure, pericardial effusion, postprocedural new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF), constrictive pericarditis, admission due to pericarditis, and gastrointestinal side effects. A systematic literature search was performed to identify historical control groups to compare with our cohort.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 129 patients underwent epicardial VT ablation with subsequent ISI and colchicine therapy. The combination of ISI and colchicine resulted in a nonsignificant trend of lower rates of pericarditis when compared with all historical control groups (3.1% [4 of 129] vs 7.0% [12 of 172]; P = 0.109) and a significant difference when compared to intrapericardial steroids (3.1% vs 13.2%; P = 0.030). The rates of pericarditic pain (10.9% [14 of 129] vs 30.9% [21 of 68]; P = 0.001), pericarditic ECG changes (5.4% [7 of 129] vs 33.8% [23 of 68]; P < 0.001) and new-onset atrial fibrillation (0.8% vs 19.5%; P = <0.001) were significantly lower in our study than in historical control groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The instillation of intrapericardial steroids along with periprocedural colchicine after epicardial VT ablation led to a decreased incidence of adverse effects associated with pericardial inflammation when compared with historical control groups. Further research with contemporary control groups is needed to confirm the suggested impact of the strategy described here.</p>","PeriodicalId":14573,"journal":{"name":"JACC. Clinical electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143023313","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-04DOI: 10.1016/j.jacep.2024.12.008
Nitin Kondamudi, Elliot J Stein, Graham H Bevan, Andrew B Stergachis, Fuki Hisama, Babak Nazer, Neal A Chatterjee
{"title":"Association of Left Ventricular Summit Arrhythmias With Pathogenic Genetic Variants.","authors":"Nitin Kondamudi, Elliot J Stein, Graham H Bevan, Andrew B Stergachis, Fuki Hisama, Babak Nazer, Neal A Chatterjee","doi":"10.1016/j.jacep.2024.12.008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacep.2024.12.008","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14573,"journal":{"name":"JACC. Clinical electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143079995","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-02DOI: 10.1016/j.jacep.2024.10.032
Jorge E Romero, Andres F Miranda-Arboleda, Mohamed Gabr, Kyleigh K Oliveira, William H Sauer, Usha B Tedrow
{"title":"Pulsed Field Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation With Persistent Left Superior Vena Cava and Heterotaxy Syndrome.","authors":"Jorge E Romero, Andres F Miranda-Arboleda, Mohamed Gabr, Kyleigh K Oliveira, William H Sauer, Usha B Tedrow","doi":"10.1016/j.jacep.2024.10.032","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacep.2024.10.032","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14573,"journal":{"name":"JACC. Clinical electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143005188","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.jacep.2024.09.017
Jonathan P. Ariyaratnam MB BChir, PhD , Melissa E. Middeldorp PhD, MPh , Anthony G. Brooks PhD , Gijo Thomas PhD , Kadhim Kadhim MBBS, PhD , Rajiv Mahajan MBBS, PhD , Rajeev K. Pathak MBBS, PhD , Glenn D. Young MBBS , Jonathan M. Kalman MBBS, PhD , Prashanthan Sanders MBBS, PhD
Background
The coronary sinus is an arrhythmogenic structure that can initiate and maintain atrial fibrillation (AF). Coronary sinus ablation has been shown to be effective in prolonging the AF cycle length and terminating AF in patients with both paroxysmal and persistent AF who have persistent AF after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI).
Objectives
The objective of this study was to undertake a randomized controlled trial to investigate the efficacy of coronary sinus isolation (CSI) as an adjunctive ablation strategy for the treatment of high-burden AF.
Methods
Consecutive patients presenting with symptomatic long episodes of paroxysmal AF (≥48 h but ≤7 days) or persistent AF (>7 days and ≤12 months) referred for first-time ablation were enrolled. Participants were randomized to either PVI, roofline ablation, and CSI (CSI group) or PVI and roofline ablation only (non-CSI group). Participants were assessed postprocedurally via clinical follow-up and 7-day Holter monitoring at regular intervals. The primary outcome was single-procedure drug-free atrial arrhythmia–free survival at 2 years.
Results
A total of 100 participants were recruited to the study; 48 were randomized to the CSI group and 52 to the non-CSI group. Acutely successful CSI was achieved in 45 of the 48 patients in the CSI group. At 2 years follow up, 30 of 48 patients (62.5%) in the CSI group and 33 of 52 (63.4%) in the non-CSI group were free from arrhythmia recurrence. Single-procedure drug-free survival at 2 years was no different between groups (P = 0.91). Similarly, multiple procedure drug assisted survival at 5 years was not different between groups (P = 0.80). Complication rates were not significantly different between groups (P = 0.19).
Conclusions
Adjunctive CSI as part of a de novo ablation strategy does not confer any additional benefit greater than PVI and roofline for the treatment of high-burden AF.
{"title":"Coronary Sinus Isolation for High-Burden Atrial Fibrillation","authors":"Jonathan P. Ariyaratnam MB BChir, PhD , Melissa E. Middeldorp PhD, MPh , Anthony G. Brooks PhD , Gijo Thomas PhD , Kadhim Kadhim MBBS, PhD , Rajiv Mahajan MBBS, PhD , Rajeev K. Pathak MBBS, PhD , Glenn D. Young MBBS , Jonathan M. Kalman MBBS, PhD , Prashanthan Sanders MBBS, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jacep.2024.09.017","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jacep.2024.09.017","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The coronary sinus is an arrhythmogenic structure that can initiate and maintain atrial fibrillation (AF). Coronary sinus ablation has been shown to be effective in prolonging the AF cycle length and terminating AF in patients with both paroxysmal and persistent AF who have persistent AF after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI).</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The objective of this study was to undertake a randomized controlled trial to investigate the efficacy of coronary sinus isolation (CSI) as an adjunctive ablation strategy for the treatment of high-burden AF.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Consecutive patients presenting with symptomatic long episodes of paroxysmal AF (≥48 h but ≤7 days) or persistent AF (>7 days and ≤12 months) referred for first-time ablation were enrolled. Participants were randomized to either PVI, roofline ablation, and CSI (CSI group) or PVI and roofline ablation only (non-CSI group). Participants were assessed postprocedurally via clinical follow-up and 7-day Holter monitoring at regular intervals. The primary outcome was single-procedure drug-free atrial arrhythmia–free survival at 2 years.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 100 participants were recruited to the study; 48 were randomized to the CSI group and 52 to the non-CSI group. Acutely successful CSI was achieved in 45 of the 48 patients in the CSI group. At 2 years follow up, 30 of 48 patients (62.5%) in the CSI group and 33 of 52 (63.4%) in the non-CSI group were free from arrhythmia recurrence. Single-procedure drug-free survival at 2 years was no different between groups (<em>P</em> = 0.91). Similarly, multiple procedure drug assisted survival at 5 years was not different between groups (<em>P</em> = 0.80). Complication rates were not significantly different between groups (<em>P</em> = 0.19).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Adjunctive CSI as part of a de novo ablation strategy does not confer any additional benefit greater than PVI and roofline for the treatment of high-burden AF.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14573,"journal":{"name":"JACC. Clinical electrophysiology","volume":"11 1","pages":"Pages 1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142465587","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}