首页 > 最新文献

JAMA dermatology最新文献

英文 中文
Wound Characteristics Among Patients Exposed to Xylazine. 接触过赛拉嗪的患者的伤口特征。
IF 11.5 1区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-13 DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.4253
Lydia Lutz, Rachel McFadden, Lin Xu, Ranvir Bhatia, M Holliday Davis, Natasa Rohacs, Jenny Wei, Jeanmarie Perrone, Margaret Lowenstein, Ashish P Thakrar

Importance: The alpha-2 agonist xylazine is increasingly detected as an adulterant in illicitly manufactured fentanyl. There is concern that xylazine may be responsible for an emerging pattern of necrotizing wounds among people who use drugs, but the clinical features of wounds associated with xylazine remain poorly characterized.

Objective: To systematically characterize the location, wound bed surface, and chronicity of wounds among persons with confirmed xylazine exposure.

Design, setting, and participants: This case series at 3 academic medical hospitals in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, included patients with emergency department or inpatient encounters from April 2022 to February 2023 who had a wound-related chief complaint and xylazine detected with urine gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy.

Exposure: Xylazine.

Main outcomes and measures: The location, size, wound bed, and chronicity of wounds associated with xylazine using electronic medical record abstraction and Fisher exact tests.

Results: Of 59 wounds from 29 unique patients with confirmed xylazine exposure (mean [SD] age, 39.4 [8.8] years; 15 [52%] male; all using fentanyl, and 23 [79%] routinely injecting opioids), 53 wounds (90%) were located on extremities, and 41 (69%) involved extensor surfaces. Five wounds (9%) involved exposed deep structures such as bone or tendon. Of 57 wounds with photographs, 34 (60%) had wound beds of predominantly devitalized tissue (eschar or slough). Based on patient report, 28 wounds (48%) were acute (<1 month old), 12 (20%) were subacute (present for 1-3 months), and 17 (29%) were chronic (developed ≥3 months prior). Subacute and chronic wounds were more often medium or large in size (odds ratio, 48.5; 95% CI, 8.2-1274.8; P < .001) and more frequently had devitalized wound beds (odds ratio, 9.5; 95% CI, 2.9-37.0; P < .001).

Conclusions and relevance: In this case series of hospitalized patients with confirmed xylazine exposure, wounds were commonly located on extensor surfaces of the extremities, frequently had devitalized tissue or exposed deep structures, and were more likely to have larger and necrotic wound beds the longer they had persisted. This systematic characterization of xylazine-associated wounds may inform identification, management, and research to address this emerging public health threat.

重要性:在非法制造的芬太尼中,越来越多地检测到α-2 促效剂异丙嗪作为掺假剂。令人担忧的是,在吸毒者中新出现的坏死性伤口模式可能是异丙嗪造成的,但与异丙嗪有关的伤口的临床特征仍不十分明确:目的:系统描述确诊接触过甲苯噻嗪的患者的伤口位置、伤口床面和慢性程度:宾夕法尼亚州费城的 3 家学术医疗医院开展了这一病例系列研究,研究对象包括 2022 年 4 月至 2023 年 2 月期间在急诊科或住院部就诊的患者,这些患者的主诉与伤口有关,并且通过尿液气相色谱-质谱分析检测到了甲基异丙嗪:主要结果和测量指标:使用电子病历摘要和费舍尔精确检验法检测与甲胺嗪相关的伤口的位置、大小、伤口床和慢性程度:在 29 名确诊接触过甲苯噻嗪的患者的 59 个伤口中(平均 [SD] 年龄 39.4 [8.8] 岁;15 [52%] 名男性;全部使用芬太尼,23 [79%] 例行注射阿片类药物),53 个伤口(90%)位于四肢,41 个伤口(69%)涉及伸肌表面。5处伤口(9%)涉及暴露在外的深层结构,如骨骼或肌腱。在 57 个有照片的伤口中,34 个(60%)的伤口床主要是坏死组织(焦痂或痂皮)。根据患者的报告,28 处伤口(48%)为急性伤口(结论和相关性:在这组确诊接触过甲苯噻嗪的住院患者病例中,伤口通常位于四肢伸侧,经常有组织坏死或深层结构外露,而且持续时间越长,伤口床越大和坏死的可能性越大。这种系统化的木乃伊相关伤口特征描述可为识别、管理和研究提供信息,以应对这种新出现的公共健康威胁。
{"title":"Wound Characteristics Among Patients Exposed to Xylazine.","authors":"Lydia Lutz, Rachel McFadden, Lin Xu, Ranvir Bhatia, M Holliday Davis, Natasa Rohacs, Jenny Wei, Jeanmarie Perrone, Margaret Lowenstein, Ashish P Thakrar","doi":"10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.4253","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.4253","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>The alpha-2 agonist xylazine is increasingly detected as an adulterant in illicitly manufactured fentanyl. There is concern that xylazine may be responsible for an emerging pattern of necrotizing wounds among people who use drugs, but the clinical features of wounds associated with xylazine remain poorly characterized.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To systematically characterize the location, wound bed surface, and chronicity of wounds among persons with confirmed xylazine exposure.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This case series at 3 academic medical hospitals in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, included patients with emergency department or inpatient encounters from April 2022 to February 2023 who had a wound-related chief complaint and xylazine detected with urine gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>Xylazine.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The location, size, wound bed, and chronicity of wounds associated with xylazine using electronic medical record abstraction and Fisher exact tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 59 wounds from 29 unique patients with confirmed xylazine exposure (mean [SD] age, 39.4 [8.8] years; 15 [52%] male; all using fentanyl, and 23 [79%] routinely injecting opioids), 53 wounds (90%) were located on extremities, and 41 (69%) involved extensor surfaces. Five wounds (9%) involved exposed deep structures such as bone or tendon. Of 57 wounds with photographs, 34 (60%) had wound beds of predominantly devitalized tissue (eschar or slough). Based on patient report, 28 wounds (48%) were acute (<1 month old), 12 (20%) were subacute (present for 1-3 months), and 17 (29%) were chronic (developed ≥3 months prior). Subacute and chronic wounds were more often medium or large in size (odds ratio, 48.5; 95% CI, 8.2-1274.8; P < .001) and more frequently had devitalized wound beds (odds ratio, 9.5; 95% CI, 2.9-37.0; P < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this case series of hospitalized patients with confirmed xylazine exposure, wounds were commonly located on extensor surfaces of the extremities, frequently had devitalized tissue or exposed deep structures, and were more likely to have larger and necrotic wound beds the longer they had persisted. This systematic characterization of xylazine-associated wounds may inform identification, management, and research to address this emerging public health threat.</p>","PeriodicalId":14734,"journal":{"name":"JAMA dermatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.5,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11561723/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142620683","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Skin Cancer Diagnosis by Lesion, Physician, and Examination Type: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. 按病变、医生和检查类型诊断皮肤癌:系统回顾与元分析》。
IF 11.5 1区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-13 DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.4382
Jennifer Y Chen, Kristen Fernandez, Raj P Fadadu, Rasika Reddy, Mi-Ok Kim, Josephine Tan, Maria L Wei
<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Skin cancer is the most common cancer in the US; accurate detection can minimize morbidity and mortality.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the accuracy of skin cancer diagnosis by lesion type, physician specialty and experience, and physical examination method.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Cross-sectional and case-control studies, randomized clinical trials, and nonrandomized controlled trials that used dermatologists or primary care physicians (PCPs) to examine keratinocytic and/or melanocytic skin lesions were included.</p><p><strong>Data extraction and synthesis: </strong>Search terms, study objectives, and protocol methods were defined before study initiation. Data extraction was performed by a reviewer, with verification by a second reviewer. A mixed-effects model was used in the data analysis. Data analyses were performed from May 2022 to December 2023.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy comprised sensitivity and specificity by physician type (primary care physician or dermatologist; experienced or inexperienced) and examination method (in-person clinical examination and/or clinical images vs dermoscopy and/or dermoscopic images).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In all, 100 studies were included in the analysis. With experienced dermatologists using clinical examination and clinical images, the sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing keratinocytic carcinomas were 79.0% and 89.1%, respectively; using dermoscopy and dermoscopic images, sensitivity and specificity were 83.7% and 87.4%, and for PCPs, 81.4% and 80.1%. Experienced dermatologists had 2.5-fold higher odds of accurate diagnosis of keratinocytic carcinomas using in-person dermoscopy and dermoscopic images compared with in-person clinical examination and images. When examining for melanoma using clinical examination and images, sensitivity and specificity were 76.9% and 89.1% for experienced dermatologists, 78.3% and 66.2% for inexperienced dermatologists, and 37.5% and 84.6% for PCPs, respectively; whereas when using dermoscopy and dermoscopic images, sensitivity and specificity were 85.7% and 81.3%, 78.0% and 69.5%, and 49.5% and 91.3%, respectively. Experienced dermatologists had 5.7-fold higher odds of accurate diagnosis of melanoma using dermoscopy compared with clinical examination. Compared with PCPs, experienced dermatologists had 13.3-fold higher odds of accurate diagnosis of melanoma using dermoscopic images.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>The findings of this systematic review and meta-analysis indicate that there are significant differences in diagnostic accuracy for skin cancer when comparing physician specialty and experience, and examination methods. These summary metrics of clinician diagnostic accuracy could be useful benchmarks for clinical trials, practitioner trainin
重要性:皮肤癌是美国最常见的癌症;准确检测可最大限度地降低发病率和死亡率:根据病变类型、医生专业和经验以及体格检查方法,评估皮肤癌诊断的准确性:数据来源:PubMed、Embase 和 Web of Science:数据提取与综合:在研究开始前确定检索词、研究目标和方案方法。数据提取由一名审稿人完成,并由第二名审稿人进行核实。数据分析采用混合效应模型。数据分析时间为2022年5月至2023年12月:根据医生类型(初级保健医生或皮肤科医生;经验丰富或经验不足)和检查方法(当面临床检查和/或临床图像与皮肤镜检查和/或皮肤镜图像),对诊断准确性的敏感性和特异性进行Meta分析:共有 100 项研究被纳入分析。经验丰富的皮肤科医生使用临床检查和临床图像诊断角化细胞癌的灵敏度和特异度分别为79.0%和89.1%;使用皮肤镜和皮肤镜图像诊断角化细胞癌的灵敏度和特异度分别为83.7%和87.4%,初级保健医生的灵敏度和特异度分别为81.4%和80.1%。经验丰富的皮肤科医生使用当面皮肤镜检查和皮肤镜图像准确诊断角化细胞癌的几率是当面临床检查和图像的 2.5 倍。在使用临床检查和图像检查黑色素瘤时,经验丰富的皮肤科医生的敏感性和特异性分别为 76.9% 和 89.1%,经验不足的皮肤科医生为 78.3% 和 66.2%,初级保健医生为 37.5% 和 84.6%;而在使用皮肤镜和皮肤镜图像时,敏感性和特异性分别为 85.7% 和 81.3%,78.0% 和 69.5%,49.5% 和 91.3%。与临床检查相比,经验丰富的皮肤科医生使用皮肤镜准确诊断黑色素瘤的几率要高出 5.7 倍。与初级保健医生相比,经验丰富的皮肤科医生使用皮肤镜图像准确诊断黑色素瘤的几率要高出13.3倍:本系统综述和荟萃分析的结果表明,在比较医生的专业和经验以及检查方法时,皮肤癌的诊断准确率存在显著差异。这些临床医生诊断准确性的简要指标可作为临床试验、从业人员培训和新兴技术性能的有用基准。
{"title":"Skin Cancer Diagnosis by Lesion, Physician, and Examination Type: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Jennifer Y Chen, Kristen Fernandez, Raj P Fadadu, Rasika Reddy, Mi-Ok Kim, Josephine Tan, Maria L Wei","doi":"10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.4382","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.4382","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Importance: &lt;/strong&gt;Skin cancer is the most common cancer in the US; accurate detection can minimize morbidity and mortality.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;To assess the accuracy of skin cancer diagnosis by lesion type, physician specialty and experience, and physical examination method.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Data sources: &lt;/strong&gt;PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Study selection: &lt;/strong&gt;Cross-sectional and case-control studies, randomized clinical trials, and nonrandomized controlled trials that used dermatologists or primary care physicians (PCPs) to examine keratinocytic and/or melanocytic skin lesions were included.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Data extraction and synthesis: &lt;/strong&gt;Search terms, study objectives, and protocol methods were defined before study initiation. Data extraction was performed by a reviewer, with verification by a second reviewer. A mixed-effects model was used in the data analysis. Data analyses were performed from May 2022 to December 2023.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Main outcomes and measures: &lt;/strong&gt;Meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy comprised sensitivity and specificity by physician type (primary care physician or dermatologist; experienced or inexperienced) and examination method (in-person clinical examination and/or clinical images vs dermoscopy and/or dermoscopic images).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;In all, 100 studies were included in the analysis. With experienced dermatologists using clinical examination and clinical images, the sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing keratinocytic carcinomas were 79.0% and 89.1%, respectively; using dermoscopy and dermoscopic images, sensitivity and specificity were 83.7% and 87.4%, and for PCPs, 81.4% and 80.1%. Experienced dermatologists had 2.5-fold higher odds of accurate diagnosis of keratinocytic carcinomas using in-person dermoscopy and dermoscopic images compared with in-person clinical examination and images. When examining for melanoma using clinical examination and images, sensitivity and specificity were 76.9% and 89.1% for experienced dermatologists, 78.3% and 66.2% for inexperienced dermatologists, and 37.5% and 84.6% for PCPs, respectively; whereas when using dermoscopy and dermoscopic images, sensitivity and specificity were 85.7% and 81.3%, 78.0% and 69.5%, and 49.5% and 91.3%, respectively. Experienced dermatologists had 5.7-fold higher odds of accurate diagnosis of melanoma using dermoscopy compared with clinical examination. Compared with PCPs, experienced dermatologists had 13.3-fold higher odds of accurate diagnosis of melanoma using dermoscopic images.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions and relevance: &lt;/strong&gt;The findings of this systematic review and meta-analysis indicate that there are significant differences in diagnostic accuracy for skin cancer when comparing physician specialty and experience, and examination methods. These summary metrics of clinician diagnostic accuracy could be useful benchmarks for clinical trials, practitioner trainin","PeriodicalId":14734,"journal":{"name":"JAMA dermatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.5,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11561728/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142620676","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Use of Anti-PD1 Blockade After Hedgehog Inhibitors or as First-Line Therapy for Gorlin Syndrome. 在使用刺猬抑制剂后使用抗 PD1 阻断剂,或将其作为戈林综合征的一线疗法。
IF 11.5 1区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-06 DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.4445
Robin Reschke, Jasmin Richter, Alexander H Enk, Jessica C Hassel
{"title":"Use of Anti-PD1 Blockade After Hedgehog Inhibitors or as First-Line Therapy for Gorlin Syndrome.","authors":"Robin Reschke, Jasmin Richter, Alexander H Enk, Jessica C Hassel","doi":"10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.4445","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.4445","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14734,"journal":{"name":"JAMA dermatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.5,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142583294","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Madelung Disease. 马德龙病
IF 11.5 1区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-06 DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.4217
Hong-Hao Hu, Cheng-Cheng Liu, Jiu-Hong Li
{"title":"Madelung Disease.","authors":"Hong-Hao Hu, Cheng-Cheng Liu, Jiu-Hong Li","doi":"10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.4217","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.4217","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14734,"journal":{"name":"JAMA dermatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.5,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142583291","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Long-Term Risk of Autoimmune and Autoinflammatory Connective Tissue Disorders Following COVID-19. COVID-19 后自身免疫和自身炎症性结缔组织疾病的长期风险。
IF 11.5 1区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-06 DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.4233
Yeon-Woo Heo, Jae Joon Jeon, Min Chul Ha, You Hyun Kim, Solam Lee

Importance: Few studies have investigated the association between COVID-19 and autoimmune and autoinflammatory connective tissue disorders; however, research with long-term observation remains insufficient.

Objective: To investigate the long-term risk of autoimmune and autoinflammatory diseases after COVID-19 over an extended observation period.

Design, setting, and participants: This retrospective nationwide population-based study investigated the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency-COVID-19-National Health Insurance Service (K-COV-N) cohort. Individuals with confirmed COVID-19 from October 8, 2020, to December 31, 2022, and controls identified among individuals who participated in the general health examination in 2018 were included in the analysis.

Exposures: Confirmed COVID-19.

Main outcomes and measures: Incidence and risk of autoimmune and autoinflammatory connective tissue disorders in patients after COVID-19. Various covariates, such as demographic characteristics, general health data, socioeconomic status, and comorbidity profiles, were balanced using inverse probability weighting.

Results: A total of 6 912 427 participants (53.6% male; mean [SD] age, 53.39 [20.13] years) consisting of 3 145 388 with COVID-19 and 3 767 039 controls with an observational period of more than 180 days were included. Alopecia areata (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 1.11 [95% CI, 1.07-1.15]), alopecia totalis (AHR, 1.24 [95% CI, 1.09-1.42]), vitiligo (AHR, 1.11 [95% CI, 1.04-1.19]), Behçet disease (AHR, 1.45 [95% CI, 1.20-1.74]), Crohn disease (AHR, 1.35 [95% CI, 1.14-1.60]), ulcerative colitis (AHR, 1.15 [95% CI, 1.04-1.28]), rheumatoid arthritis (AHR, 1.09 [95% CI, 1.06-1.12]), systemic lupus erythematosus (AHR, 1.14 [95% CI, 1.01-1.28]), Sjögren syndrome (AHR, 1.13 [95% CI, 1.03-1.25]), ankylosing spondylitis (AHR, 1.11 [95% CI, 1.02-1.20]), and bullous pemphigoid (AHR, 1.62 [95% CI, 1.07-2.45]) were associated with higher risk in the COVID-19 group. Subgroup analyses revealed that demographic factors, including male and female sex, age younger than 40 years, and age 40 years and older, exhibited diverse associations with the risk of autoimmune and autoinflammatory outcomes. In addition, severe COVID-19 infection requiring intensive care unit admission, the Delta period, and not being vaccinated were associated with higher risk.

Conclusions and relevance: This retrospective cohort study with an extended follow-up period found associations between COVID-19 and the long-term risk of various autoimmune and autoinflammatory connective tissue disorders. Long-term monitoring and care of patients is crucial after COVID-19, considering demographic factors, disease severity, and vaccination status, to mitigate these risks.

重要性:很少有研究调查了COVID-19与自身免疫性和自身炎症性结缔组织疾病之间的关联;然而,长期观察的研究仍然不足:调查长期观察 COVID-19 后患自身免疫性疾病和自身炎症性疾病的长期风险:这项以全国人口为基础的回顾性研究调查了韩国疾病预防控制机构-COVID-19-国民健康保险服务(K-COV-N)队列。分析对象包括 2020 年 10 月 8 日至 2022 年 12 月 31 日期间确诊为 COVID-19 的个体,以及在 2018 年参加一般健康检查的个体中确定的对照组:确诊的COVID-19.主要结果和测量指标:COVID-19后患者自身免疫性和自身炎症性结缔组织疾病的发病率和风险。采用反概率加权法平衡人口统计学特征、一般健康数据、社会经济状况和合并症概况等各种协变量:共纳入了 6 912 427 名参与者(53.6% 为男性;平均 [SD] 年龄为 53.39 [20.13] 岁),其中包括 3 145 388 名 COVID-19 患者和 3 767 039 名观察期超过 180 天的对照组患者。其中,斑秃(调整后危险比 [AHR],1.11 [95% CI,1.07-1.15])、全秃(AHR,1.24 [95% CI,1.09-1.42])、白癜风(AHR,1.11 [95% CI,1.04-1.19])、白塞氏病(AHR,1.45 [95% CI,1.20-1.74])、克罗恩病(AHR,1.35 [95% CI,1.14-1.60])、溃疡性结肠炎(AHR,1.15 [95% CI,1.04-1.28])、类风湿(AHR,1.15 [95% CI,1.04-1.19])。28])、类风湿性关节炎(AHR,1.09 [95% CI,1.06-1.12])、系统性红斑狼疮(AHR,1.14 [95% CI,1.01-1.28])、Sjögren 综合征(AHR,1.13 [95% CI,1.03-1.25])、强直性脊柱炎(AHR,1.15 [95% CI,1.04-1.28])。25])、强直性脊柱炎(AHR,1.11 [95% CI,1.02-1.20])和牛皮癣(AHR,1.62 [95% CI,1.07-2.45])与 COVID-19 组的较高风险相关。亚组分析显示,人口统计学因素(包括男女性别、40 岁以下和 40 岁及以上)与自身免疫和自身炎症结果的风险呈现出不同的关联。此外,需要入住重症监护室的严重COVID-19感染、德尔塔时期和未接种疫苗与较高风险相关:这项延长随访期的回顾性队列研究发现,COVID-19 与各种自身免疫性和自身炎症性结缔组织疾病的长期风险有关。考虑到人口统计学因素、疾病严重程度和疫苗接种情况,在 COVID-19 后对患者进行长期监测和护理对降低这些风险至关重要。
{"title":"Long-Term Risk of Autoimmune and Autoinflammatory Connective Tissue Disorders Following COVID-19.","authors":"Yeon-Woo Heo, Jae Joon Jeon, Min Chul Ha, You Hyun Kim, Solam Lee","doi":"10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.4233","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.4233","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Few studies have investigated the association between COVID-19 and autoimmune and autoinflammatory connective tissue disorders; however, research with long-term observation remains insufficient.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the long-term risk of autoimmune and autoinflammatory diseases after COVID-19 over an extended observation period.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This retrospective nationwide population-based study investigated the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency-COVID-19-National Health Insurance Service (K-COV-N) cohort. Individuals with confirmed COVID-19 from October 8, 2020, to December 31, 2022, and controls identified among individuals who participated in the general health examination in 2018 were included in the analysis.</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>Confirmed COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Incidence and risk of autoimmune and autoinflammatory connective tissue disorders in patients after COVID-19. Various covariates, such as demographic characteristics, general health data, socioeconomic status, and comorbidity profiles, were balanced using inverse probability weighting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 6 912 427 participants (53.6% male; mean [SD] age, 53.39 [20.13] years) consisting of 3 145 388 with COVID-19 and 3 767 039 controls with an observational period of more than 180 days were included. Alopecia areata (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 1.11 [95% CI, 1.07-1.15]), alopecia totalis (AHR, 1.24 [95% CI, 1.09-1.42]), vitiligo (AHR, 1.11 [95% CI, 1.04-1.19]), Behçet disease (AHR, 1.45 [95% CI, 1.20-1.74]), Crohn disease (AHR, 1.35 [95% CI, 1.14-1.60]), ulcerative colitis (AHR, 1.15 [95% CI, 1.04-1.28]), rheumatoid arthritis (AHR, 1.09 [95% CI, 1.06-1.12]), systemic lupus erythematosus (AHR, 1.14 [95% CI, 1.01-1.28]), Sjögren syndrome (AHR, 1.13 [95% CI, 1.03-1.25]), ankylosing spondylitis (AHR, 1.11 [95% CI, 1.02-1.20]), and bullous pemphigoid (AHR, 1.62 [95% CI, 1.07-2.45]) were associated with higher risk in the COVID-19 group. Subgroup analyses revealed that demographic factors, including male and female sex, age younger than 40 years, and age 40 years and older, exhibited diverse associations with the risk of autoimmune and autoinflammatory outcomes. In addition, severe COVID-19 infection requiring intensive care unit admission, the Delta period, and not being vaccinated were associated with higher risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>This retrospective cohort study with an extended follow-up period found associations between COVID-19 and the long-term risk of various autoimmune and autoinflammatory connective tissue disorders. Long-term monitoring and care of patients is crucial after COVID-19, considering demographic factors, disease severity, and vaccination status, to mitigate these risks.</p>","PeriodicalId":14734,"journal":{"name":"JAMA dermatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.5,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11541739/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142583289","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Psoriasis Risk With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors. 免疫检查点抑制剂的牛皮癣风险。
IF 11.5 1区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-06 DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.4129
Sheng-Yin To, Cho-Hao Lee, Yi-Hsien Chen, Chia-Lu Hsu, Hui-Wen Yang, Ying-Shan Jiang, Yuan-Liang Wen, I-Wen Chen, Li-Ting Kao

Importance: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are recognized as revolutionary cancer therapies but have raised concerns about immune-related adverse events, including the development of autoimmune diseases.

Objective: To evaluate the psoriasis risk associated with the use of ICIs in patients with cancer.

Design, setting, and participants: This nationwide cohort study with a target trial emulation design used data from the Taiwan National Health Insurance database and the Taiwan Cancer Registry. The participants included were patients who received antineoplastic medications for cancer at stages III and IV between January 1, 2019, and June 30, 2021. Data were analyzed from May 2023 to July 2024.

Exposures: Patients treated with ICIs were classified as ICI users, while those who received chemotherapy or targeted therapies were categorized as non-ICI users.

Main outcome and measures: The primary outcome was the incidence of psoriasis during the follow-up period. Stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to mitigate potential confounders. Cox and Fine-Gray hazard models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) for psoriasis risk between groups.

Results: Of 135 230 patients who received antineoplastic medications (mean [SD] age, 62.94 [13.01] years; 45.1% female), 3188 patients were eligible for the ICI user group, while 132 042 patients were eligible for the non-ICI user group. ICI users experienced a higher incidence of psoriasis at 5.76 cases per 1000 person-years, compared to 1.44 cases in the non-ICI group. After adjusting for demographics and comorbidities, ICI users were found to have a 2-fold increase in the risk of developing psoriasis (IPTW-adjusted HR, 3.31; IPTW-adjusted subdistribution HR, 2.43). Both as-started design and on-treatment design showed consistent findings, and the results were consistent and robust across all follow-up intervals and all sensitivity analyses.

Conclusions and relevance: In this cohort study, patients with cancer treated with ICIs faced an increased risk of psoriasis. Medical professionals should be aware of the potential adverse effects of immunotherapy to ensure optimal cancer care.

重要性:免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)是公认的革命性癌症疗法,但也引发了对免疫相关不良事件的担忧,包括自身免疫性疾病的发生:评估与癌症患者使用 ICIs 相关的银屑病风险:这项采用目标试验模拟设计的全国性队列研究使用了台湾国民健康保险数据库和台湾癌症登记处的数据。研究对象包括在 2019 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 6 月 30 日期间接受抗肿瘤药物治疗的 III 期和 IV 期癌症患者。数据分析时间为 2023 年 5 月至 2024 年 7 月:接受 ICIs 治疗的患者被归类为 ICI 使用者,而接受化疗或靶向治疗的患者被归类为非 ICI 使用者:主要结果和测量指标:主要结果是随访期间的银屑病发病率。采用稳定的逆治疗概率加权法(IPTW)来减少潜在的混杂因素。采用Cox和Fine-Gray危险模型计算组间银屑病风险的危险比(HRs):在135230名接受抗肿瘤药物治疗的患者(平均[SD]年龄为62.94[13.01]岁;45.1%为女性)中,有3188名患者符合ICI使用者组的条件,而有132042名患者符合非ICI使用者组的条件。ICI 使用者的银屑病发病率较高,每千人年为 5.76 例,而非 ICI 组为 1.44 例。在对人口统计学和合并症进行调整后,发现 ICI 使用者患银屑病的风险增加了 2 倍(IPTW 调整后 HR,3.31;IPTW 调整后子分布 HR,2.43)。起始设计和治疗中设计均显示出一致的结果,所有随访间隔和所有敏感性分析的结果均一致且稳健:在这项队列研究中,接受 ICIs 治疗的癌症患者罹患银屑病的风险增加。医务人员应了解免疫疗法的潜在不良反应,以确保提供最佳的癌症护理。
{"title":"Psoriasis Risk With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.","authors":"Sheng-Yin To, Cho-Hao Lee, Yi-Hsien Chen, Chia-Lu Hsu, Hui-Wen Yang, Ying-Shan Jiang, Yuan-Liang Wen, I-Wen Chen, Li-Ting Kao","doi":"10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.4129","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.4129","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are recognized as revolutionary cancer therapies but have raised concerns about immune-related adverse events, including the development of autoimmune diseases.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the psoriasis risk associated with the use of ICIs in patients with cancer.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This nationwide cohort study with a target trial emulation design used data from the Taiwan National Health Insurance database and the Taiwan Cancer Registry. The participants included were patients who received antineoplastic medications for cancer at stages III and IV between January 1, 2019, and June 30, 2021. Data were analyzed from May 2023 to July 2024.</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>Patients treated with ICIs were classified as ICI users, while those who received chemotherapy or targeted therapies were categorized as non-ICI users.</p><p><strong>Main outcome and measures: </strong>The primary outcome was the incidence of psoriasis during the follow-up period. Stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to mitigate potential confounders. Cox and Fine-Gray hazard models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) for psoriasis risk between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 135 230 patients who received antineoplastic medications (mean [SD] age, 62.94 [13.01] years; 45.1% female), 3188 patients were eligible for the ICI user group, while 132 042 patients were eligible for the non-ICI user group. ICI users experienced a higher incidence of psoriasis at 5.76 cases per 1000 person-years, compared to 1.44 cases in the non-ICI group. After adjusting for demographics and comorbidities, ICI users were found to have a 2-fold increase in the risk of developing psoriasis (IPTW-adjusted HR, 3.31; IPTW-adjusted subdistribution HR, 2.43). Both as-started design and on-treatment design showed consistent findings, and the results were consistent and robust across all follow-up intervals and all sensitivity analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this cohort study, patients with cancer treated with ICIs faced an increased risk of psoriasis. Medical professionals should be aware of the potential adverse effects of immunotherapy to ensure optimal cancer care.</p>","PeriodicalId":14734,"journal":{"name":"JAMA dermatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.5,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11541743/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142583292","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
COVID-19 as a Risk Factor For Autoimmune Skin Disease. 作为自身免疫性皮肤病风险因素的 COVID-19
IF 11.5 1区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-06 DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.4222
Lisa M Arkin, John S Barbieri, Edward W Cowen
{"title":"COVID-19 as a Risk Factor For Autoimmune Skin Disease.","authors":"Lisa M Arkin, John S Barbieri, Edward W Cowen","doi":"10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.4222","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.4222","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14734,"journal":{"name":"JAMA dermatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.5,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142583205","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Application of Risk-Based Cancer Screening in Patients With Dermatomyositis. 基于风险的癌症筛查在皮肌炎患者中的应用
IF 11.5 1区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.3355
Caroline J Stone, Daniella Forman Faden, Lillian Xie, Lais Lopes Almeida Gomes, Emily Z Hejazi, Victoria P Werth, Katharina S Shaw
{"title":"Application of Risk-Based Cancer Screening in Patients With Dermatomyositis.","authors":"Caroline J Stone, Daniella Forman Faden, Lillian Xie, Lais Lopes Almeida Gomes, Emily Z Hejazi, Victoria P Werth, Katharina S Shaw","doi":"10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.3355","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.3355","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14734,"journal":{"name":"JAMA dermatology","volume":" ","pages":"1248-1251"},"PeriodicalIF":11.5,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11425187/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142346989","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Global Antimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns of Staphylococcus aureus in Atopic Dermatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. 特应性皮炎中金黄色葡萄球菌的全球抗菌药敏感性模式:系统回顾与元分析》。
IF 11.5 1区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.3360
Itzel Guadalupe Elizalde-Jiménez, Fernando Gerardo Ruiz-Hernández, Silvia Angélica Carmona-Cruz, Elena Pastrana-Arellano, Alejandra Aquino-Andrade, Carolina Romo-González, Eduardo Arias-de la Garza, Neri Alejandro Álvarez-Villalobos, Maria Teresa García-Romero

Importance: Individuals with atopic dermatitis are frequently colonized and infected with Staphylococcus aureus. Empirical antibiotic therapy for individuals with atopic dermatitis is common, but data about the antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of S aureus strains isolated from these individuals are scarce for those living in particular geographic areas.

Objective: To determine the antimicrobial susceptibility of S aureus from individuals with atopic dermatitis and analyze differences according to the income level of the country of origin and the data collection period.

Data sources: A meta-analysis of the literature was performed from the inception of the included databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane) to June 20, 2023, using predetermined Medical Subject Headings.

Study selection: Studies were included if they reported antibiotic susceptibility profiles of 1 or more S aureus cutaneous isolates from individuals with atopic dermatitis. Articles written in English, Spanish, French, or German were included.

Data extraction and synthesis: Working in pairs, 6 of the authors conducted the data extraction. The guidelines from the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) were followed.

Main outcomes and measures: The outcome of interest was antimicrobial susceptibility.

Results: A total of 61 studies reported 4091 S aureus isolates from individuals with atopic dermatitis. For 4 of the 11 commonly used antibiotics (36.4%), antimicrobial susceptibility was 85% or less, including for methicillin (binomial proportion, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.76-0.91]), erythromycin (binomial proportion, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.61-0.83]), fusidic acid (binomial proportion, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.62-0.91]), and clindamycin (binomial proportion, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.65-0.89]). Most studies (46; 75.4%) were conducted in high-income countries. Antimicrobial susceptibility to erythromycin, methicillin, and trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole was significantly lower in lower middle-income countries and upper middle-income countries. Regarding the temporal trends, 33 studies (54.1%) reported data collected from 1998 to 2010. Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns have not changed over time.

Conclusions and relevance: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, antimicrobial susceptibility of S aureus to β-lactams, erythromycin, clindamycin, and fusidic acid may be suboptimal for empirical use in individuals with atopic dermatitis. Significant differences in antimicrobial susceptibility patterns were found in high-income countries and in lower middle-income countries and upper middle-income countries for some antibiotics.

重要性:特应性皮炎患者经常定植和感染金黄色葡萄球菌。对特应性皮炎患者进行经验性抗生素治疗很常见,但从这些患者身上分离出的金黄色葡萄球菌菌株对特定地理区域的抗菌药敏感性数据却很少:目的:确定特应性皮炎患者金黄色葡萄球菌的抗菌药敏感性,并分析原籍国收入水平和数据收集时间的差异:采用预先确定的医学主题词,对从纳入数据库(MEDLINE、Embase、Web of Science、Scopus 和 Cochrane)开始到 2023 年 6 月 20 日期间的文献进行了荟萃分析:如果研究报告了来自特应性皮炎患者的一种或多种金黄色葡萄球菌皮肤分离物的抗生素敏感性概况,则纳入该研究。数据提取与综合:6 位作者两人一组进行数据提取。数据提取和综合:6 位作者两人一组进行数据提取,并遵循《系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目》(PRISMA)指南:主要结果和测量指标:相关结果为抗菌药物敏感性:共有 61 项研究报告了来自特应性皮炎患者的 4091 例金葡菌分离物。在 11 种常用抗生素中,有 4 种(36.4%)的抗菌药敏感性为 85% 或更低,其中包括甲氧西林(二项式比例,0.85 [95% CI,0.76-0.91])、红霉素(二项式比例,0.85 [95% CI,0.76-0.91])、氨苄西林(二项式比例,0.85 [95% CI,0.76-0.91])。91])、红霉素(二项比例,0.73 [95% CI,0.61-0.83])、夫西地酸(二项比例,0.80 [95% CI,0.62-0.91])和克林霉素(二项比例,0.79 [95% CI,0.65-0.89])。大多数研究(46;75.4%)在高收入国家进行。中低收入国家和中高收入国家对红霉素、甲氧西林、三甲氧苄氨嘧啶和磺胺甲噁唑的抗菌药物敏感性明显较低。关于时间趋势,33 项研究(54.1%)报告了 1998 年至 2010 年收集的数据。随着时间的推移,抗菌药敏感性模式没有发生变化:在这项系统回顾和荟萃分析中,金黄色葡萄球菌对β-内酰胺类、红霉素、克林霉素和夫西地酸的抗菌药敏感性可能低于特应性皮炎患者经验性用药的最佳敏感性。在高收入国家、中低收入国家和中高收入国家,某些抗生素的抗菌药敏感性模式存在显著差异。
{"title":"Global Antimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns of Staphylococcus aureus in Atopic Dermatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Itzel Guadalupe Elizalde-Jiménez, Fernando Gerardo Ruiz-Hernández, Silvia Angélica Carmona-Cruz, Elena Pastrana-Arellano, Alejandra Aquino-Andrade, Carolina Romo-González, Eduardo Arias-de la Garza, Neri Alejandro Álvarez-Villalobos, Maria Teresa García-Romero","doi":"10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.3360","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.3360","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Individuals with atopic dermatitis are frequently colonized and infected with Staphylococcus aureus. Empirical antibiotic therapy for individuals with atopic dermatitis is common, but data about the antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of S aureus strains isolated from these individuals are scarce for those living in particular geographic areas.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the antimicrobial susceptibility of S aureus from individuals with atopic dermatitis and analyze differences according to the income level of the country of origin and the data collection period.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>A meta-analysis of the literature was performed from the inception of the included databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane) to June 20, 2023, using predetermined Medical Subject Headings.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Studies were included if they reported antibiotic susceptibility profiles of 1 or more S aureus cutaneous isolates from individuals with atopic dermatitis. Articles written in English, Spanish, French, or German were included.</p><p><strong>Data extraction and synthesis: </strong>Working in pairs, 6 of the authors conducted the data extraction. The guidelines from the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) were followed.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The outcome of interest was antimicrobial susceptibility.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 61 studies reported 4091 S aureus isolates from individuals with atopic dermatitis. For 4 of the 11 commonly used antibiotics (36.4%), antimicrobial susceptibility was 85% or less, including for methicillin (binomial proportion, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.76-0.91]), erythromycin (binomial proportion, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.61-0.83]), fusidic acid (binomial proportion, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.62-0.91]), and clindamycin (binomial proportion, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.65-0.89]). Most studies (46; 75.4%) were conducted in high-income countries. Antimicrobial susceptibility to erythromycin, methicillin, and trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole was significantly lower in lower middle-income countries and upper middle-income countries. Regarding the temporal trends, 33 studies (54.1%) reported data collected from 1998 to 2010. Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns have not changed over time.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this systematic review and meta-analysis, antimicrobial susceptibility of S aureus to β-lactams, erythromycin, clindamycin, and fusidic acid may be suboptimal for empirical use in individuals with atopic dermatitis. Significant differences in antimicrobial susceptibility patterns were found in high-income countries and in lower middle-income countries and upper middle-income countries for some antibiotics.</p>","PeriodicalId":14734,"journal":{"name":"JAMA dermatology","volume":" ","pages":"1171-1181"},"PeriodicalIF":11.5,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11425196/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142346993","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
New-Onset Vulvar Edema in a Pediatric Patient. 一名儿科患者新发外阴水肿。
IF 11.5 1区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.2561
Eugeni Prat Colilles, Adrià Plana Pla, Isabel Bielsa Marsol
{"title":"New-Onset Vulvar Edema in a Pediatric Patient.","authors":"Eugeni Prat Colilles, Adrià Plana Pla, Isabel Bielsa Marsol","doi":"10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.2561","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.2561","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14734,"journal":{"name":"JAMA dermatology","volume":" ","pages":"1243-1244"},"PeriodicalIF":11.5,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142346995","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
JAMA dermatology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1