首页 > 最新文献

JAMA dermatology最新文献

英文 中文
Antibiotic Use and the Persistence of Biologic Therapies in Patients With Psoriasis. 银屑病患者的抗生素使用和生物治疗的持久性。
IF 11 1区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-12 DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2025.4427
Raphaël Ouakrat, Laetitia Penso, Denis Jullien, Harry Sokol, Emilie Sbidian

Importance: The long-term effectiveness of biologic therapies in psoriasis may decline over time. Gut microbiota alterations induced by antibiotics have been proposed as a potential mechanism impairing biologic persistence.

Objective: To evaluate the association between antibiotic exposure and the persistence of biologic therapies in patients with psoriasis.

Design, setting, and participants: This retrospective cohort study used data from the French National Health Insurance database between June 2011 and December 2022. Adults initiating a biologic therapy for psoriasis were included, excluding those with preexisting inflammatory bowel disease at baseline. Data were analyzed from January to September 2024.

Exposures: At baseline, antibiotics exposure was classified as none, 1, or 2 or more dispensations in the 6 months preceding the index date. During follow-up, time-dependent antibiotics exposure was defined as none, 1, or 2 or more antibiotics dispensations in the 6 months prior to each time of follow-up.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was discontinuation or switch of the initial biologic therapy. Exposure to antibiotics was assessed within 6 months prior to biologic initiation and during follow-up. A weighted Cox marginal structural model was used to estimate adjusted hazard ratios.

Results: Of 36 129 included patients, 11 228 (42.0%) were female, 20 192 (55.9%) were male, and the mean (SD) age was 48.4 (15.1) years. A total of 9366 (25.9%) were exposed to antibiotics at baseline and 21 900 (60.6%) during follow-up. The most commonly prescribed antibiotic classes were β-lactams, macrolides, and fluoroquinolones. Antibiotic exposure was associated with a higher risk of biologic discontinuation (weighted hazard ratio, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.08-1.16), with a stronger effect observed for multiple dispensations (weighted hazard ratio, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.24-1.35), suggesting a dose-response relationship.

Conclusions and relevance: In this cohort study, antibiotic exposure was significantly associated with an increased risk of discontinuation of biologic therapies in psoriasis. These findings support the hypothesis that antibiotics, potentially through gut dysbiosis, may reduce biologic persistence. However, unmeasured confounders limit causal interpretation. Further studies are necessary to validate these findings.

重要性:银屑病生物治疗的长期有效性可能随着时间的推移而下降。抗生素引起的肠道菌群改变被认为是损害生物持久性的潜在机制。目的:探讨银屑病患者抗生素暴露与生物治疗持续时间的关系。设计、环境和参与者:这项回顾性队列研究使用了2011年6月至2022年12月期间法国国家健康保险数据库的数据。纳入了开始银屑病生物治疗的成年人,排除了基线时已存在炎症性肠病的成年人。数据分析时间为2024年1月至9月。暴露:基线时,在索引日期前6个月内,抗生素暴露被分类为无、1次或2次或更多。在随访期间,时间依赖性抗生素暴露被定义为在每次随访前6个月内没有、1次或2次或更多抗生素处方。主要结局和措施:主要结局是停止或切换初始生物治疗。在生物起始治疗前6个月内和随访期间评估抗生素暴露情况。加权Cox边际结构模型用于估计调整后的风险比。结果:36 129例患者中,女性11 228例(42.0%),男性20 192例(55.9%),平均(SD)年龄48.4(15.1)岁。基线时共有9366人(25.9%)暴露于抗生素,随访期间有21 900人(60.6%)暴露于抗生素。最常用的抗生素是β-内酰胺类、大环内酯类和氟喹诺酮类。抗生素暴露与较高的生物停药风险相关(加权风险比,1.12;95% CI, 1.08-1.16),多次配药的影响更强(加权风险比,1.29;95% CI, 1.24-1.35),表明存在剂量-反应关系。结论和相关性:在这项队列研究中,抗生素暴露与银屑病生物治疗停止的风险增加显著相关。这些发现支持了抗生素可能通过肠道生态失调降低生物持久性的假设。然而,未测量的混杂因素限制了因果解释。需要进一步的研究来验证这些发现。
{"title":"Antibiotic Use and the Persistence of Biologic Therapies in Patients With Psoriasis.","authors":"Raphaël Ouakrat, Laetitia Penso, Denis Jullien, Harry Sokol, Emilie Sbidian","doi":"10.1001/jamadermatol.2025.4427","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamadermatol.2025.4427","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>The long-term effectiveness of biologic therapies in psoriasis may decline over time. Gut microbiota alterations induced by antibiotics have been proposed as a potential mechanism impairing biologic persistence.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the association between antibiotic exposure and the persistence of biologic therapies in patients with psoriasis.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This retrospective cohort study used data from the French National Health Insurance database between June 2011 and December 2022. Adults initiating a biologic therapy for psoriasis were included, excluding those with preexisting inflammatory bowel disease at baseline. Data were analyzed from January to September 2024.</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>At baseline, antibiotics exposure was classified as none, 1, or 2 or more dispensations in the 6 months preceding the index date. During follow-up, time-dependent antibiotics exposure was defined as none, 1, or 2 or more antibiotics dispensations in the 6 months prior to each time of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary outcome was discontinuation or switch of the initial biologic therapy. Exposure to antibiotics was assessed within 6 months prior to biologic initiation and during follow-up. A weighted Cox marginal structural model was used to estimate adjusted hazard ratios.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 36 129 included patients, 11 228 (42.0%) were female, 20 192 (55.9%) were male, and the mean (SD) age was 48.4 (15.1) years. A total of 9366 (25.9%) were exposed to antibiotics at baseline and 21 900 (60.6%) during follow-up. The most commonly prescribed antibiotic classes were β-lactams, macrolides, and fluoroquinolones. Antibiotic exposure was associated with a higher risk of biologic discontinuation (weighted hazard ratio, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.08-1.16), with a stronger effect observed for multiple dispensations (weighted hazard ratio, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.24-1.35), suggesting a dose-response relationship.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this cohort study, antibiotic exposure was significantly associated with an increased risk of discontinuation of biologic therapies in psoriasis. These findings support the hypothesis that antibiotics, potentially through gut dysbiosis, may reduce biologic persistence. However, unmeasured confounders limit causal interpretation. Further studies are necessary to validate these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":14734,"journal":{"name":"JAMA dermatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12613086/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145494359","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Pott Puffy Tumor. 波特肿瘤。
IF 11 1区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-12 DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2025.4206
Kazuki Watanabe, Mitsuhito Ota
{"title":"Pott Puffy Tumor.","authors":"Kazuki Watanabe, Mitsuhito Ota","doi":"10.1001/jamadermatol.2025.4206","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2025.4206","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14734,"journal":{"name":"JAMA dermatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145495263","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Multiple Papules and Nodules on the Face and Extremities. 面部和四肢多发丘疹和结节。
IF 11 1区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-12 DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2025.3903
Xiaopo Wang, Suying Feng
{"title":"Multiple Papules and Nodules on the Face and Extremities.","authors":"Xiaopo Wang, Suying Feng","doi":"10.1001/jamadermatol.2025.3903","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2025.3903","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14734,"journal":{"name":"JAMA dermatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145495101","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Recovering From Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis. 史蒂文斯-约翰逊综合征和中毒性表皮坏死松解的康复。
IF 11 1区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-12 DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2025.4345
Michelle D Martin-Pozo, Elizabeth A Williams, Kemberlee R Bonnet, Benjamin H Kaffenberger, David G Schlundt, Elizabeth J Phillips

Importance: Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS/TEN) survivors experience substantial long-term sequelae. Research on physical symptoms experienced during acute hospitalization is well documented, but limited studies have been completed on the long-term biopsychosocial effects of SJS/TEN, particularly from the patient's perspective.

Objective: To increase the understanding of the long-term complications of SJS/TEN.

Design, setting, and participants: This qualitative investigation was completed from within a community-based study, the SJS Survivors Study, using a semistructured, in-depth interview guide to query participants about their SJS/TEN experience postdischarge from the hospital. Interviews took place by phone from July 2021 through August 2023. This study included adults who experienced SJS/TEN within the United States.

Main outcome and measures: A biopsychosocial theory-based framework and hierarchical coding system were utilized to understand the long-term life impacts of survivors of SJS/TEN.

Results: The 29 participants, aged 26 to 76 years, were 66% female and 69% White and had experienced SJS/TEN from a wide range of drugs. Patients experienced support while in the hospital, but once discharged, felt isolated and without support to understand the potential sustained impacts of SJS/TEN in their lives and the lives of their family members. Patients experienced ongoing biological symptoms, such as skin issues, debilitating visual impairment, blindness, and lack of functional autonomy. Psychological impacts included symptoms of anxiety, obsessive thinking, flashbacks, and depression. Socially, some survivors expressed a sense of abandonment and described negative impacts on their careers. Survivors also expressed frustration and isolation with having to navigate posthospital care alone. There was a lack of preemptive discharge education and SJS/TEN-specific planning. Lack of physician knowledge about SJS/TEN was particularly noted and survivors turned to the internet for guidance instead of receiving direction from their physicians. Medical distrust among survivors was frequently noted.

Conclusions and relevance: The findings highlight the need for postdischarge care coordination among patients and their primary physicians, including mental health support. This care coordination should be arranged prior to discharge to ensure the availability of adequate support and optimal health outcomes. It is essential that clinicians and researchers prioritize the understanding of long-term sequelae of SJS/TEN and improve current discharge education and protocols for patients and their families.

重要性:史蒂文斯-约翰逊综合征和中毒性表皮坏死松解(SJS/TEN)的幸存者经历了大量的长期后遗症。对急性住院期间出现的身体症状的研究有充分的记录,但对SJS/TEN的长期生物心理社会影响的研究有限,特别是从患者的角度进行的研究。目的:提高对SJS/TEN远期并发症的认识。设计、环境和参与者:本定性调查来自一项基于社区的SJS幸存者研究,使用半结构化的深度访谈指南来询问参与者出院后的SJS/TEN经历。采访于2021年7月至2023年8月期间通过电话进行。这项研究包括在美国经历过SJS/TEN的成年人。主要结果和措施:采用基于生物心理社会理论的框架和分层编码系统来了解SJS/TEN幸存者的长期生活影响。结果:29名参与者,年龄在26至76岁之间,66%为女性,69%为白人,并且经历过各种药物引起的SJS/TEN。患者在住院期间得到了支持,但一旦出院,就会感到孤立,没有支持来理解SJS/TEN对他们的生活及其家庭成员的潜在持续影响。患者出现持续的生物学症状,如皮肤问题、衰弱性视力损害、失明和缺乏功能自主性。心理影响包括焦虑症状、强迫性思维、闪回和抑郁。在社交方面,一些幸存者表达了一种被遗弃的感觉,并描述了对他们职业生涯的负面影响。幸存者还对不得不独自进行出院后护理表示沮丧和孤立。缺乏先发制人的出院教育和SJS/ ten的具体规划。医生对SJS/TEN的知识缺乏尤其值得注意,幸存者转向互联网寻求指导,而不是接受医生的指导。人们经常注意到幸存者对医疗的不信任。结论和相关性:研究结果强调了患者及其主治医生出院后护理协调的必要性,包括心理健康支持。这种护理协调应在出院前安排,以确保获得充分的支持和最佳的健康结果。临床医生和研究人员必须优先了解SJS/TEN的长期后遗症,并改善目前对患者及其家属的出院教育和协议。
{"title":"Recovering From Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis.","authors":"Michelle D Martin-Pozo, Elizabeth A Williams, Kemberlee R Bonnet, Benjamin H Kaffenberger, David G Schlundt, Elizabeth J Phillips","doi":"10.1001/jamadermatol.2025.4345","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamadermatol.2025.4345","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS/TEN) survivors experience substantial long-term sequelae. Research on physical symptoms experienced during acute hospitalization is well documented, but limited studies have been completed on the long-term biopsychosocial effects of SJS/TEN, particularly from the patient's perspective.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To increase the understanding of the long-term complications of SJS/TEN.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This qualitative investigation was completed from within a community-based study, the SJS Survivors Study, using a semistructured, in-depth interview guide to query participants about their SJS/TEN experience postdischarge from the hospital. Interviews took place by phone from July 2021 through August 2023. This study included adults who experienced SJS/TEN within the United States.</p><p><strong>Main outcome and measures: </strong>A biopsychosocial theory-based framework and hierarchical coding system were utilized to understand the long-term life impacts of survivors of SJS/TEN.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 29 participants, aged 26 to 76 years, were 66% female and 69% White and had experienced SJS/TEN from a wide range of drugs. Patients experienced support while in the hospital, but once discharged, felt isolated and without support to understand the potential sustained impacts of SJS/TEN in their lives and the lives of their family members. Patients experienced ongoing biological symptoms, such as skin issues, debilitating visual impairment, blindness, and lack of functional autonomy. Psychological impacts included symptoms of anxiety, obsessive thinking, flashbacks, and depression. Socially, some survivors expressed a sense of abandonment and described negative impacts on their careers. Survivors also expressed frustration and isolation with having to navigate posthospital care alone. There was a lack of preemptive discharge education and SJS/TEN-specific planning. Lack of physician knowledge about SJS/TEN was particularly noted and survivors turned to the internet for guidance instead of receiving direction from their physicians. Medical distrust among survivors was frequently noted.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>The findings highlight the need for postdischarge care coordination among patients and their primary physicians, including mental health support. This care coordination should be arranged prior to discharge to ensure the availability of adequate support and optimal health outcomes. It is essential that clinicians and researchers prioritize the understanding of long-term sequelae of SJS/TEN and improve current discharge education and protocols for patients and their families.</p>","PeriodicalId":14734,"journal":{"name":"JAMA dermatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12613091/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145495252","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Epithelial Barrier Diseases Among Adult Patients With Seborrheic Dermatitis. 成人脂溢性皮炎患者的上皮屏障疾病。
IF 11 1区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-05 DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2025.4313
Sabrina Meng, Ronald Berna, Ole Hoffstad, Junko Takeshita, Daniel Shin, Zelma C Chiesa Fuxench, David J Margolis

Importance: The epithelial barrier theory (EBT) proposes that epithelial barrier disruption is implicated in the development of skin, respiratory, gastrointestinal, and ocular diseases (epithelial barrier diseases, or EBDs). There is a need to better understand the relationship between seborrheic dermatitis and EBDs, and we hypothesize that seborrheic dermatitis, characterized by epithelial barrier dysfunction, is associated with increased frequency of other EBDs.

Objective: To explore the association between seborrheic dermatitis and EBDs.

Design, setting, and participants: This retrospective cohort study used a large US administrative claims database, which included data collected from multiple health care centers and patient care settings across the US from January 1, 2016, through June 30, 2022. This study consisted of patients aged 18 years and older at enrollment, with at least 1 year of continuous enrollment, and with a minimum of 2 visits on unique days to a medical professional. The mean (SD) patient follow-up time was 3.46 (1.80) years with a total follow-up of more than 70 million person-years. Individuals with missing data for demographic covariates, including age, sex, and division (ie, billing region), were excluded. Data were analyzed from January to September 2025.

Exposures: Diagnosis of seborrheic dermatitis at any point during the observation period.

Main outcomes and measures: Diagnosis of an EBD at any point during the observation period.

Results: Of 20 274 189 patients, 733 776 (3.62%) had seborrheic dermatitis (median [IQR] age, 62.63 [41.53-70.55] years; 54.7% female). Using adjusted models, seborrheic dermatitis was positively associated with atopic dermatitis (odds ratio [OR], 3.21; 95% CI, 3.18-3.24), alopecia areata (OR, 4.02; 95% CI, 3.93-4.11), contact dermatitis (OR, 2.25; 95% CI, 2.23-2.26), psoriasis (OR, 3.26; 95% CI, 3.23-3.29), rosacea (OR, 4.52; 95% CI, 4.49-4.56), hidradenitis suppurativa (OR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.58-1.68), chronic spontaneous urticaria (OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.33-1.37), pemphigus vulgaris (OR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.31-1.69), bullous pemphigoid (OR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.51-1.70), rhinosinusitis (OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.24-1.25), celiac disease (OR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.32-1.39), irritable bowel syndrome (OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.31-1.33), ocular allergy (OR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.37-1.41), and dry eye (OR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.48-1.49) and was negatively associated with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.71-0.72) and pulmonary hypertension (OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.69-0.71).

Conclusions and relevance: These findings support the EBT as a shared driver in the pathogenesis of seborrheic dermatitis and other diverse EBDs and encourage further investigation into the underlying mechanisms of disease pathogenesis.

重要性:上皮屏障理论(EBT)提出上皮屏障破坏与皮肤、呼吸、胃肠道和眼部疾病(上皮屏障疾病,EBDs)的发展有关。有必要更好地了解脂溢性皮炎和EBDs之间的关系,我们假设以上皮屏障功能障碍为特征的脂溢性皮炎与其他EBDs的发生率增加有关。目的:探讨脂溢性皮炎与EBDs的关系。设计、环境和参与者:这项回顾性队列研究使用了一个大型的美国行政索赔数据库,其中包括从2016年1月1日至2022年6月30日期间从美国多个医疗保健中心和患者护理机构收集的数据。本研究包括入组时年龄在18岁及以上的患者,连续入组至少1年,并且在特定的日子里至少有2次就诊于医疗专业人员。患者的平均(SD)随访时间为3.46(1.80)年,总随访超过7000万人年。排除了人口统计协变量(包括年龄、性别和地区(即计费地区))数据缺失的个体。数据分析时间为2025年1月至9月。暴露:在观察期间的任何时间点诊断脂溢性皮炎。主要观察结果和测量指标:在观察期间任何时间点诊断出EBD。结果:在20 274 189例患者中,733 776例(3.62%)患有脂溢性皮炎(中位[IQR]年龄62.63[41.53-70.55]岁,女性54.7%)。使用调整后的模型,脂溢性皮炎与特应性皮炎(比值比[OR], 3.21; 95% CI, 3.18-3.24)、斑疹(OR, 4.02; 95% CI, 3.93-4.11)、接触性皮炎(OR, 2.25; 95% CI, 2.23-2.26)、牛皮癣(OR, 3.26; 95% CI, 3.23-3.29)、酒痤疮(OR, 4.52; 95% CI, 4.49-4.56)、化脓性汗腺炎(OR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.33-1.37)、慢性自发性荨麻疹(OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.33-1.37)、寻常性天疱疮(OR, 1.48;95% CI, 1.31-1.69)、大疱性天疱疮(OR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.51-1.70)、鼻窦炎(OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.24-1.25)、乳糜泻(OR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.32-1.39)、肠易激综合征(OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.31-1.33)、眼部过敏(OR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.37-1.41)和干眼症(OR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.48-1.49)与慢性阻塞性肺病(OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.71-0.72)和肺动脉高压(OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.69-0.71)呈负相关。结论和相关性:这些发现支持EBT是脂溢性皮炎和其他多种ebd发病机制的共同驱动因素,并鼓励进一步研究疾病发病机制的潜在机制。
{"title":"Epithelial Barrier Diseases Among Adult Patients With Seborrheic Dermatitis.","authors":"Sabrina Meng, Ronald Berna, Ole Hoffstad, Junko Takeshita, Daniel Shin, Zelma C Chiesa Fuxench, David J Margolis","doi":"10.1001/jamadermatol.2025.4313","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamadermatol.2025.4313","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>The epithelial barrier theory (EBT) proposes that epithelial barrier disruption is implicated in the development of skin, respiratory, gastrointestinal, and ocular diseases (epithelial barrier diseases, or EBDs). There is a need to better understand the relationship between seborrheic dermatitis and EBDs, and we hypothesize that seborrheic dermatitis, characterized by epithelial barrier dysfunction, is associated with increased frequency of other EBDs.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the association between seborrheic dermatitis and EBDs.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This retrospective cohort study used a large US administrative claims database, which included data collected from multiple health care centers and patient care settings across the US from January 1, 2016, through June 30, 2022. This study consisted of patients aged 18 years and older at enrollment, with at least 1 year of continuous enrollment, and with a minimum of 2 visits on unique days to a medical professional. The mean (SD) patient follow-up time was 3.46 (1.80) years with a total follow-up of more than 70 million person-years. Individuals with missing data for demographic covariates, including age, sex, and division (ie, billing region), were excluded. Data were analyzed from January to September 2025.</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>Diagnosis of seborrheic dermatitis at any point during the observation period.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Diagnosis of an EBD at any point during the observation period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 20 274 189 patients, 733 776 (3.62%) had seborrheic dermatitis (median [IQR] age, 62.63 [41.53-70.55] years; 54.7% female). Using adjusted models, seborrheic dermatitis was positively associated with atopic dermatitis (odds ratio [OR], 3.21; 95% CI, 3.18-3.24), alopecia areata (OR, 4.02; 95% CI, 3.93-4.11), contact dermatitis (OR, 2.25; 95% CI, 2.23-2.26), psoriasis (OR, 3.26; 95% CI, 3.23-3.29), rosacea (OR, 4.52; 95% CI, 4.49-4.56), hidradenitis suppurativa (OR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.58-1.68), chronic spontaneous urticaria (OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.33-1.37), pemphigus vulgaris (OR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.31-1.69), bullous pemphigoid (OR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.51-1.70), rhinosinusitis (OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.24-1.25), celiac disease (OR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.32-1.39), irritable bowel syndrome (OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.31-1.33), ocular allergy (OR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.37-1.41), and dry eye (OR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.48-1.49) and was negatively associated with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.71-0.72) and pulmonary hypertension (OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.69-0.71).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>These findings support the EBT as a shared driver in the pathogenesis of seborrheic dermatitis and other diverse EBDs and encourage further investigation into the underlying mechanisms of disease pathogenesis.</p>","PeriodicalId":14734,"journal":{"name":"JAMA dermatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12590386/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145444830","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Immunostimulatory Herbal Intake and Autoantibody Positivity in Dermatomyositis. 皮肌炎患者免疫刺激性中药摄入与自身抗体阳性。
IF 11 1区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-05 DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2025.3961
Xiwei Yang, Aretha On, Shae Chambers, Hammad Ali, Lais Lopes Almeida Gomes, Touraj Khosravi-Hafshejani, Victoria P Werth
{"title":"Immunostimulatory Herbal Intake and Autoantibody Positivity in Dermatomyositis.","authors":"Xiwei Yang, Aretha On, Shae Chambers, Hammad Ali, Lais Lopes Almeida Gomes, Touraj Khosravi-Hafshejani, Victoria P Werth","doi":"10.1001/jamadermatol.2025.3961","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamadermatol.2025.3961","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14734,"journal":{"name":"JAMA dermatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12590381/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145444869","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cross-Modal Imaging in Noninvasive Identification of Histologic Features of Skin. 跨模态成像在无创皮肤组织学特征鉴别中的应用。
IF 11 1区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-05 DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2025.4318
Sarah T Arron, Afton Cobb, Lilia M Correa-Selm, Katherine M Given, Manu Jain, David Pilkington, Jennifer Y Wang, Michael Z Wang
<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Histopathology with light microscopy is the reference standard for cellular evaluation of solid tissue, but whether noninvasive cross-modal imaging of skin provides clinicians with comparable histologic information that may assist in clinical decision-making is not well known.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate safety and effectiveness of cross-modal imaging in obtaining in vivo images, to demonstrate that images align with corresponding skin histopathology, and to evaluate the ability of blinded readers to accurately identify tissue features on cross-modal images.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This observational diagnostic study included 1 visit and follow-up call. Eligible participants were adults aged 18 to 99 years seen for routine care in the outpatient dermatology setting with an indication for lesional skin biopsy. The study was conducted from October 20, 2022, to August 11, 2023, at 2 outpatient dermatology clinics in the US. Cross-modal images and skin biopsy were collected from 1 lesion per participant. Participants were randomized to training (40%) and validation sets (60%). Comparative readers used the training set to evaluate cross-modal images against hematoxylin and eosin histopathology to validate tissue features and train blinded physician readers. Comparative readers developed a performance test with the validation set; blinded physician readers were tested on cross-modal feature identification without access to other participant data.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>All participants underwent cross-modal imaging before biopsy.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary end points were 100% comparative reader agreement and validation of cross-modal image tissue features against histopathology and 90% or greater accuracy of blinded physician readers identification of primary tissue features against comparative reader annotation. Secondary end points included accuracy of blinded physician reader identification of secondary features and greater than 90% interrater agreement between blinded physician readers. The safety end point was the number of adverse events observed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 65 participants (median age, 69 [range 20-93] years; 41.5% female and 58.5% male; 1.5% American Indian or Alaska Native; 13.8% Hispanic or Latino; 86.2% not Hispanic or Latino; 98.5% White) underwent cross-modal imaging. Comparative readers achieved 100% consensus and validation of cross-modal histologic features compared with histopathology. Blinded physician reader accuracy for primary histologic features was 96.4% (95% CI, 94.2%-98.7%) and for secondary histologic features was 98.5% (95% CI, 98.1%-98.9%). Interrater agreement among the blinded physician readers was high (Fleiss κ: region, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.87-1.0]; feature, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.88-0.97]). No adverse events were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong
重要性:光镜下的组织病理学是实体组织细胞评估的参考标准,但皮肤的无创跨模态成像是否能为临床医生提供可辅助临床决策的可比组织学信息尚不清楚。目的:评价跨模态成像获取活体图像的安全性和有效性,证明图像与相应的皮肤组织病理学一致,并评估盲法读者准确识别跨模态图像上组织特征的能力。设计、设置和参与者:这项观察性诊断研究包括1次就诊和随访电话。符合条件的参与者是18至99岁的成年人,在门诊皮肤科进行常规护理,并有病变皮肤活检的指征。该研究于2022年10月20日至2023年8月11日在美国的两家皮肤科门诊诊所进行。从每位参与者的一个病变处采集交叉模态图像和皮肤活检。参与者被随机分配到训练组(40%)和验证组(60%)。比较读者使用训练集来评估针对苏木精和伊红组织病理学的跨模态图像,以验证组织特征和训练盲医读者。比较阅读者开发了一个性能测试与验证集;盲法的医师读者在没有访问其他参与者数据的情况下进行了跨模态特征识别测试。暴露:所有参与者在活检前都进行了交叉模态成像。主要结果和测量:主要终点是100%的比较读者对组织病理学的跨模态图像组织特征的一致性和验证,以及90%或更高的盲法医生读者对比较读者注释的主要组织特征识别的准确性。次要终点包括盲法医师读者对次要特征识别的准确性和盲法医师读者之间大于90%的一致性。安全性终点是观察到的不良事件的数量。结果:共有65名参与者(中位年龄69岁,[范围20-93]岁;41.5%女性,58.5%男性;1.5%美国印第安人或阿拉斯加原住民;13.8%西班牙裔或拉丁裔;86.2%非西班牙裔或拉丁裔;98.5%白人)接受了跨模式成像。与组织病理学相比,比较读者对跨模态组织学特征的一致性和有效性达到100%。盲法医师读者对原发性组织学特征的准确率为96.4% (95% CI, 94.2%-98.7%),对继发性组织学特征的准确率为98.5% (95% CI, 98.1%-98.9%)。盲法医师读者之间的通译一致性很高(Fleiss κ:区域,0.94 [95% CI, 0.87-1.0];特征,0.93 [95% CI, 0.88-0.97])。无不良事件报告。结论和相关性:本研究的结果表明,跨模态成像是安全的,训练有素的医生可以准确地识别跨模态图像上的组织学特征,这与美国食品和药物管理局批准的辅助临床判断的作用是一致的。
{"title":"Cross-Modal Imaging in Noninvasive Identification of Histologic Features of Skin.","authors":"Sarah T Arron, Afton Cobb, Lilia M Correa-Selm, Katherine M Given, Manu Jain, David Pilkington, Jennifer Y Wang, Michael Z Wang","doi":"10.1001/jamadermatol.2025.4318","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamadermatol.2025.4318","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Importance: &lt;/strong&gt;Histopathology with light microscopy is the reference standard for cellular evaluation of solid tissue, but whether noninvasive cross-modal imaging of skin provides clinicians with comparable histologic information that may assist in clinical decision-making is not well known.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;To evaluate safety and effectiveness of cross-modal imaging in obtaining in vivo images, to demonstrate that images align with corresponding skin histopathology, and to evaluate the ability of blinded readers to accurately identify tissue features on cross-modal images.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Design, setting, and participants: &lt;/strong&gt;This observational diagnostic study included 1 visit and follow-up call. Eligible participants were adults aged 18 to 99 years seen for routine care in the outpatient dermatology setting with an indication for lesional skin biopsy. The study was conducted from October 20, 2022, to August 11, 2023, at 2 outpatient dermatology clinics in the US. Cross-modal images and skin biopsy were collected from 1 lesion per participant. Participants were randomized to training (40%) and validation sets (60%). Comparative readers used the training set to evaluate cross-modal images against hematoxylin and eosin histopathology to validate tissue features and train blinded physician readers. Comparative readers developed a performance test with the validation set; blinded physician readers were tested on cross-modal feature identification without access to other participant data.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Exposure: &lt;/strong&gt;All participants underwent cross-modal imaging before biopsy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Main outcomes and measures: &lt;/strong&gt;The primary end points were 100% comparative reader agreement and validation of cross-modal image tissue features against histopathology and 90% or greater accuracy of blinded physician readers identification of primary tissue features against comparative reader annotation. Secondary end points included accuracy of blinded physician reader identification of secondary features and greater than 90% interrater agreement between blinded physician readers. The safety end point was the number of adverse events observed.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;A total of 65 participants (median age, 69 [range 20-93] years; 41.5% female and 58.5% male; 1.5% American Indian or Alaska Native; 13.8% Hispanic or Latino; 86.2% not Hispanic or Latino; 98.5% White) underwent cross-modal imaging. Comparative readers achieved 100% consensus and validation of cross-modal histologic features compared with histopathology. Blinded physician reader accuracy for primary histologic features was 96.4% (95% CI, 94.2%-98.7%) and for secondary histologic features was 98.5% (95% CI, 98.1%-98.9%). Interrater agreement among the blinded physician readers was high (Fleiss κ: region, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.87-1.0]; feature, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.88-0.97]). No adverse events were reported.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions and relevance: &lt;/strong","PeriodicalId":14734,"journal":{"name":"JAMA dermatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12590393/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145444787","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparative Risk of Infection and Prevalence of Combination Targeted Therapy in Psoriatic Arthritis. 银屑病关节炎感染的比较风险和联合靶向治疗的流行。
IF 11 1区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-01 DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2025.2980
Alexander Wu, Arianna Zhang, Yujia Guo, Jialiang Liu, Donghan M Yang, Lourdes Perez Chada, Alexis Ogdie, Soumya M Reddy, Alice B Gottlieb, Jose U Scher, Joseph F Merola
<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Achieving good disease control in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) remains a major challenge. Combining multiple systemic immunomodulatory therapies has been shown to be beneficial in other immune-mediated diseases with reasonable safety profiles, but data on the current use and safety of combination targeted therapy among individuals with PsA are limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the use and safety of combination targeted therapies among adults with PsA.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>Data from the IBM MarketScan Commercial Claims Database from January 2015 to December 2024 were used to describe use patterns and perform safety analyses. Data were analyzed from April 2024 to June 2025. A validated claims algorithm was used to identify adults with PsA, who were separated into a standard therapy control cohort that was matched 2:1 with the combination targeted therapy cohort.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Descriptive analysis of the use of combination targeted therapies. The safety analysis included a comparison of frequencies of International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes for serious or opportunistic infections requiring an inpatient level of care. Relative risks (RRs) were calculated before and after propensity score matching.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 82 399 individuals identified with PsA, 542 individuals (median [IQR] age, 52.5 [44.0-59.0] years; 341 female individuals [62.9%]) were receiving combination targeted therapy for 3 consecutive months and 200 (median [IQR] age, 55.0 [45.0-61.0] years; 114 female individuals [57.0%]) were receiving combination therapy for 6 consecutive months. The 2 most common combinations used were a tumor necrosis factor inhibitor with apremilast (34%-37%) and an interleukin 17 inhibitor with apremilast (27%-29%). The serious infection incidence rate among patients receiving combination targeted therapy ranged from 7.38 to 15.00 events per 1000 patients; the opportunistic infection incidence rate ranged from 0 to 1.85 events per 1000 patients. Patients receiving combination targeted therapy did not have a significantly increased risk of serious infection (propensity score-matched 3-month and 6-month RRs, 0.53 [95% CI, 0.17-1.63] and 1.50 [95% CI, 0.34-6.65], respectively) or opportunistic infection (adjusted 3-month and 6-month RRs, 1.00 [95% CI, 0.09-11.02] and not applicable, respectively) across all analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>The results of this cohort study suggest that among commercially insured adults with PsA, around 1% of individuals were receiving combination targeted therapy. The most common combinations used different biologics with apremilast. This study found no significant difference between the incidence of serious bacterial and opportunistic infections requiring hospitalization compared with sta
重要性:在银屑病关节炎(PsA)中实现良好的疾病控制仍然是一个主要挑战。联合多种全身免疫调节疗法已被证明对其他免疫介导的疾病有益,且具有合理的安全性,但目前在PsA患者中联合靶向治疗的使用和安全性数据有限。目的:评价成人PsA联合靶向治疗的应用及安全性。设计、设置和参与者:2015年1月至2024年12月来自IBM MarketScan商业索赔数据库的数据用于描述使用模式并进行安全性分析。数据分析时间为2024年4月至2025年6月。使用一种经过验证的声明算法来识别患有PsA的成年人,他们被分成标准治疗对照队列,与联合靶向治疗队列的比例为2:1。主要结局和指标:联合靶向治疗使用的描述性分析。安全性分析包括比较《国际疾病和相关健康问题统计分类第十版》(ICD-10)编码中需要住院治疗的严重感染或机会性感染的频率。在倾向评分匹配前后计算相对风险(RRs)。结果:在82 399例确诊PsA患者中,542例(年龄中位数为52.5[44.0 ~ 59.0]岁,女性341例(62.9%))连续3个月接受联合靶向治疗,200例(年龄中位数为55.0[45.0 ~ 61.0]岁,女性114例(57.0%))连续6个月接受联合靶向治疗。最常见的两种组合是肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂与阿普米司特(34%-37%)和白细胞介素17抑制剂与阿普米司特(27%-29%)。接受联合靶向治疗的患者严重感染发生率为7.38 ~ 15.00 / 1000;机会性感染发生率为0 ~ 1.85 / 1000。在所有分析中,接受联合靶向治疗的患者发生严重感染(倾向评分匹配的3个月和6个月RRs分别为0.53 [95% CI, 0.17-1.63]和1.50 [95% CI, 0.34-6.65])或机会性感染(调整后的3个月和6个月RRs为1.00 [95% CI, 0.09-11.02],分别不适用)的风险均未显著增加。结论和相关性:这项队列研究的结果表明,在商业保险的PsA成人中,约1%的个体正在接受联合靶向治疗。最常见的组合使用不同的生物制剂与阿普雷米司特。本研究发现,与标准治疗相比,需要住院治疗的严重细菌感染和机会性感染的发生率无显著差异,提示联合靶向治疗可能不会显著增加感染风险,但需要进一步进行更大规模的研究。
{"title":"Comparative Risk of Infection and Prevalence of Combination Targeted Therapy in Psoriatic Arthritis.","authors":"Alexander Wu, Arianna Zhang, Yujia Guo, Jialiang Liu, Donghan M Yang, Lourdes Perez Chada, Alexis Ogdie, Soumya M Reddy, Alice B Gottlieb, Jose U Scher, Joseph F Merola","doi":"10.1001/jamadermatol.2025.2980","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamadermatol.2025.2980","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Importance: &lt;/strong&gt;Achieving good disease control in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) remains a major challenge. Combining multiple systemic immunomodulatory therapies has been shown to be beneficial in other immune-mediated diseases with reasonable safety profiles, but data on the current use and safety of combination targeted therapy among individuals with PsA are limited.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;To evaluate the use and safety of combination targeted therapies among adults with PsA.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Design, setting, and participants: &lt;/strong&gt;Data from the IBM MarketScan Commercial Claims Database from January 2015 to December 2024 were used to describe use patterns and perform safety analyses. Data were analyzed from April 2024 to June 2025. A validated claims algorithm was used to identify adults with PsA, who were separated into a standard therapy control cohort that was matched 2:1 with the combination targeted therapy cohort.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Main outcomes and measures: &lt;/strong&gt;Descriptive analysis of the use of combination targeted therapies. The safety analysis included a comparison of frequencies of International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes for serious or opportunistic infections requiring an inpatient level of care. Relative risks (RRs) were calculated before and after propensity score matching.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;Among 82 399 individuals identified with PsA, 542 individuals (median [IQR] age, 52.5 [44.0-59.0] years; 341 female individuals [62.9%]) were receiving combination targeted therapy for 3 consecutive months and 200 (median [IQR] age, 55.0 [45.0-61.0] years; 114 female individuals [57.0%]) were receiving combination therapy for 6 consecutive months. The 2 most common combinations used were a tumor necrosis factor inhibitor with apremilast (34%-37%) and an interleukin 17 inhibitor with apremilast (27%-29%). The serious infection incidence rate among patients receiving combination targeted therapy ranged from 7.38 to 15.00 events per 1000 patients; the opportunistic infection incidence rate ranged from 0 to 1.85 events per 1000 patients. Patients receiving combination targeted therapy did not have a significantly increased risk of serious infection (propensity score-matched 3-month and 6-month RRs, 0.53 [95% CI, 0.17-1.63] and 1.50 [95% CI, 0.34-6.65], respectively) or opportunistic infection (adjusted 3-month and 6-month RRs, 1.00 [95% CI, 0.09-11.02] and not applicable, respectively) across all analyses.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions and relevance: &lt;/strong&gt;The results of this cohort study suggest that among commercially insured adults with PsA, around 1% of individuals were receiving combination targeted therapy. The most common combinations used different biologics with apremilast. This study found no significant difference between the incidence of serious bacterial and opportunistic infections requiring hospitalization compared with sta","PeriodicalId":14734,"journal":{"name":"JAMA dermatology","volume":" ","pages":"1162-1166"},"PeriodicalIF":11.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12368786/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144954864","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Annular Cutaneous Lesion of the Neck. 颈部环形皮肤病变。
IF 11 1区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-01 DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2025.2592
Yi-Xiao Wang, Min Gao, Li-Xiong Gu
{"title":"Annular Cutaneous Lesion of the Neck.","authors":"Yi-Xiao Wang, Min Gao, Li-Xiong Gu","doi":"10.1001/jamadermatol.2025.2592","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamadermatol.2025.2592","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14734,"journal":{"name":"JAMA dermatology","volume":" ","pages":"1177-1178"},"PeriodicalIF":11.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145130896","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Error in Figure 4. 图4中的错误。
IF 11 1区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-01 DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2025.4473
{"title":"Error in Figure 4.","authors":"","doi":"10.1001/jamadermatol.2025.4473","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamadermatol.2025.4473","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14734,"journal":{"name":"JAMA dermatology","volume":" ","pages":"1195"},"PeriodicalIF":11.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12529322/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145292281","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
JAMA dermatology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1