首页 > 最新文献

JAMA dermatology最新文献

英文 中文
Rapid Improvement in Refractory Acute Generalized Exanthematous Pustulosis With Spesolimab. 斯派索利单抗能迅速改善难治性急性泛发性脓疱病
IF 11.5 1区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-07 DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.2311
Yijie Xuan, Shanglin Jin, Chengfeng Zhang, Shangshang Wang
{"title":"Rapid Improvement in Refractory Acute Generalized Exanthematous Pustulosis With Spesolimab.","authors":"Yijie Xuan, Shanglin Jin, Chengfeng Zhang, Shangshang Wang","doi":"10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.2311","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.2311","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14734,"journal":{"name":"JAMA dermatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":11.5,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141897457","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cutaneous Inflammatory Manifestations of Chronic Granulomatous Disease. 慢性肉芽肿病的皮肤炎症表现。
IF 11.5 1区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.1393
Anubha Dev, Ridhima Aggarwal, Pandiarajan Vignesh, Keshavamurthy Vinay, Amit Rawat, Debajyoti Chatterjee, Sunil Dogra
{"title":"Cutaneous Inflammatory Manifestations of Chronic Granulomatous Disease.","authors":"Anubha Dev, Ridhima Aggarwal, Pandiarajan Vignesh, Keshavamurthy Vinay, Amit Rawat, Debajyoti Chatterjee, Sunil Dogra","doi":"10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.1393","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.1393","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14734,"journal":{"name":"JAMA dermatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":11.5,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11223043/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141491937","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Multiple Onychopapillomas and BAP1 Tumor Predisposition Syndrome. 多发性 Onychopapillomas 和 BAP1 肿瘤易感综合征。
IF 11.5 1区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.1804
Alexandra Lebensohn, Azam Ghafoor, Luke Bloomquist, Michael C Royer, Leslie Castelo-Soccio, Kelli Karacki, Olanda Hathaway, Tenin Maglo, Cathy Wagner, Maria G Agra, Andrew M Blakely, David S Schrump, Raffit Hassan, Edward W Cowen

Importance: BRCA1-associated protein (BAP1) tumor predisposition syndrome (TPDS) is a cancer genodermatosis associated with high risk of uveal and cutaneous melanoma, basal cell carcinoma, and multiple internal malignant neoplasms, including mesothelioma and renal cell carcinoma. Early detection of the syndrome is important for cancer surveillance and genetic counseling of family members who are at risk.

Objective: To determine the prevalence of nail abnormalities in individuals with pathogenic germline variants in BAP1.

Design, setting, and participants: In this prospective cohort study, individuals who were known carriers of pathogenic BAP1 germline variants were consecutively enrolled between October 10, 2023, and March 15, 2024. Dermatologic evaluation for nail abnormalities was performed, including a history of nail abnormalities and associated symptoms, physical examination, medical photography, and nail biopsy for histopathology. This was a single-center study conducted at the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center.

Main outcomes and measures: Primary outcomes were the prevalence and spectrum of nail changes and histopathologic characterization.

Results: Among 47 participants (30 female [63.8%]; mean [SD] age, 46.4 [15.1] years) ranging in age from 13 to 72 years from 35 families, nail abnormalities were detected in 41 patients (87.2%) and included leukonychia, splinter hemorrhage, onychoschizia, and distal nail hyperkeratosis. Clinical findings consistent with onychopapilloma were detected in 39 patients (83.0%), including 35 of 40 individuals aged 30 years or older (87.5%). Nail bed biopsy was performed in 5 patients and was consistent with onychopapilloma. Polydactylous involvement with onychopapillomas was detected in nearly all patients who had nail involvement (38 of 39 patients [97.4%]).

Conclusions and relevance: This study found that BAP1 TPDS was associated with a high rate of nail abnormalities consistent with onychopapillomas in adult carriers of the disease. Findings suggest that this novel cutaneous sign may facilitate detection of the syndrome in family members who are at risk and patients with cancers associated with BAP1 given that multiple onychopapillomas are uncommon in the general population and may be a distinct clue to the presence of a pathogenic germline variant in the BAP1 gene.

重要性:BRCA1 相关蛋白(BAP1)肿瘤易感综合征(TPDS)是一种癌症基因遗传病,与葡萄膜和皮肤黑色素瘤、基底细胞癌以及包括间皮瘤和肾细胞癌在内的多种体内恶性肿瘤的高风险相关。早期发现该综合征对癌症监测和高危家庭成员的遗传咨询非常重要:目的:确定BAP1致病性种系变异个体中指甲异常的患病率:在这项前瞻性队列研究中,2023 年 10 月 10 日至 2024 年 3 月 15 日期间连续招募了已知的 BAP1 基因变异致病性携带者。研究人员对指甲异常进行了皮肤学评估,包括指甲异常病史和相关症状、体格检查、医学摄影和指甲活检组织病理学检查。这是一项在美国国立卫生研究院临床中心进行的单中心研究:主要结果和测量方法:主要结果是指甲变化的发生率和范围以及组织病理学特征:在来自35个家庭、年龄从13岁到72岁不等的47名参与者(30名女性[63.8%];平均[标码]年龄为46.4[15.1]岁)中,有41名患者(87.2%)被检测出指甲异常,包括白斑病、劈裂出血、甲癣和远端甲过度角化。39名患者(83.0%)的临床表现与甲软骨瘤相符,其中40人中有35人年龄在30岁或以上(87.5%)。对 5 名患者进行了甲床活检,结果与甲软骨瘤一致。几乎所有指甲受累的患者(39 例患者中有 38 例[97.4%])都发现了甲多发性受累:本研究发现,BAP1 TPDS 与成年带原者指甲异常率较高有关,与甲沟乳头状瘤一致。研究结果表明,鉴于多发性甲状软骨瘤在普通人群中并不常见,这种新的皮肤征象可能有助于在高危家庭成员和与 BAP1 相关的癌症患者中发现该综合征,并可能成为 BAP1 基因致病性种系变异存在的明显线索。
{"title":"Multiple Onychopapillomas and BAP1 Tumor Predisposition Syndrome.","authors":"Alexandra Lebensohn, Azam Ghafoor, Luke Bloomquist, Michael C Royer, Leslie Castelo-Soccio, Kelli Karacki, Olanda Hathaway, Tenin Maglo, Cathy Wagner, Maria G Agra, Andrew M Blakely, David S Schrump, Raffit Hassan, Edward W Cowen","doi":"10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.1804","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.1804","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>BRCA1-associated protein (BAP1) tumor predisposition syndrome (TPDS) is a cancer genodermatosis associated with high risk of uveal and cutaneous melanoma, basal cell carcinoma, and multiple internal malignant neoplasms, including mesothelioma and renal cell carcinoma. Early detection of the syndrome is important for cancer surveillance and genetic counseling of family members who are at risk.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the prevalence of nail abnormalities in individuals with pathogenic germline variants in BAP1.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>In this prospective cohort study, individuals who were known carriers of pathogenic BAP1 germline variants were consecutively enrolled between October 10, 2023, and March 15, 2024. Dermatologic evaluation for nail abnormalities was performed, including a history of nail abnormalities and associated symptoms, physical examination, medical photography, and nail biopsy for histopathology. This was a single-center study conducted at the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Primary outcomes were the prevalence and spectrum of nail changes and histopathologic characterization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 47 participants (30 female [63.8%]; mean [SD] age, 46.4 [15.1] years) ranging in age from 13 to 72 years from 35 families, nail abnormalities were detected in 41 patients (87.2%) and included leukonychia, splinter hemorrhage, onychoschizia, and distal nail hyperkeratosis. Clinical findings consistent with onychopapilloma were detected in 39 patients (83.0%), including 35 of 40 individuals aged 30 years or older (87.5%). Nail bed biopsy was performed in 5 patients and was consistent with onychopapilloma. Polydactylous involvement with onychopapillomas was detected in nearly all patients who had nail involvement (38 of 39 patients [97.4%]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>This study found that BAP1 TPDS was associated with a high rate of nail abnormalities consistent with onychopapillomas in adult carriers of the disease. Findings suggest that this novel cutaneous sign may facilitate detection of the syndrome in family members who are at risk and patients with cancers associated with BAP1 given that multiple onychopapillomas are uncommon in the general population and may be a distinct clue to the presence of a pathogenic germline variant in the BAP1 gene.</p>","PeriodicalId":14734,"journal":{"name":"JAMA dermatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":11.5,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11102040/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140957382","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Measuring Signs of Atopic Dermatitis in Clinical Practice: A HOME-CP Consensus Statement. 在临床实践中测量特应性皮炎的体征:HOME-CP 共识声明》。
IF 11.5 1区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.1162
Michael E Jacobson, Yael A Leshem, Christian Apfelbacher, Phyllis I Spuls, Louise A A Gerbens, Kim S Thomas, Hywel C Williams, Norito Katoh, Laura Howells, Jochen Schmitt, Stefanie Deckert, Rishi Seshadri, Eric L Simpson

Importance: Outcome measurement is an essential component of value-based health care and can aid patient care, quality improvement, and clinical effectiveness evidence generation. The Harmonising Outcome Measures for Eczema Clinical Practice initiative aims to identify a list of validated, feasible, outcome measurement instruments recommended to measure atopic dermatitis (AD) in the clinical practice setting. The clinical practice set is a list of instruments that clinicians can pick and choose from to suit their needs in the context of clinical care.

Objective: To recommend instruments to measure clinical signs of AD in clinical practice.

Evidence review: Following the predefined roadmap, a mixed methods design was implemented and incorporated systematic reviews and qualitative consensus methods. Previous systematic reviews identified few clinical signs instruments with sufficient validation for recommendation. An updated systematic review evaluating the validity of clinical signs instruments informed an international meeting to reach consensus on recommended instruments to measure AD clinical signs in clinical practice. Consensus was defined as less than 30% disagreement. An in-person consensus exercise was held in Montreal, Canada, on October 16, 2022. The 34 attendees included patient and patient advocate research partners, health care professionals, researchers, methodologists, and industry representatives.

Findings: The updated systematic review found that the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), Scoring Atopic Dermatitis, and objective Scoring Atopic Dermatitis were the only instruments that demonstrated sufficient performance in all assessed measurement properties. The modified EASI and Signs Global Assessment × Body Surface Area instruments were also recommended. The EASI, Validated Investigator Global Assessment, and Investigator's Global Assessment multiplied by or measured concurrently with a body surface area measure achieved consensus in criteria and were adopted.

Conclusions and relevance: This consensus statement by the Harmonising Outcome Measures for Eczema initiative suggests that when assessing and documenting clinical signs of AD, there are several valid and feasible instruments that can best fit a clinician's specific practice needs. These instruments should improve and standardize the documentation of signs severity, help determine the effect of treatment, facilitate the generation of clinical effectiveness evidence, and enhance the implementation of value-based health care.

重要性:结果测量是以价值为基础的医疗保健的重要组成部分,有助于患者护理、质量改进和临床有效性证据的生成。统一湿疹临床实践结果测量方法倡议旨在确定一份经过验证的、可行的结果测量工具清单,建议用于在临床实践环境中测量特应性皮炎 (AD)。临床实践集是一份工具清单,临床医生可根据临床护理的需要从中挑选适合自己的工具:推荐在临床实践中测量 AD 临床症状的工具:按照预先确定的路线图,我们采用了混合方法设计,并结合了系统综述和定性共识方法。之前的系统综述发现,只有少数临床体征测量工具经过了充分验证,可以推荐使用。评估临床体征工具有效性的最新系统综述为一次国际会议提供了信息,该会议旨在就临床实践中测量 AD 临床体征的推荐工具达成共识。共识的定义是分歧少于 30%。会议于 2022 年 10 月 16 日在加拿大蒙特利尔举行。34名与会者包括患者和患者权益倡导者研究伙伴、医疗保健专业人员、研究人员、方法论专家和行业代表:更新后的系统综述发现,湿疹面积和严重程度指数(EASI)、特应性皮炎评分和特应性皮炎客观评分是唯一在所有评估测量属性方面都表现出足够性能的工具。此外,还推荐使用修改后的 EASI 和 Signs Global Assessment × Body Surface Area 工具。EASI、经过验证的研究者全球评估和研究者全球评估乘以体表面积或与体表面积同时测量的方法在标准上达成了共识,并被采纳:湿疹结果衡量标准统一化倡议的这份共识声明表明,在评估和记录 AD 的临床症状时,有几种有效可行的工具最适合临床医生的具体实践需求。这些工具可改善体征严重程度的记录并使之标准化,有助于确定治疗效果,促进临床有效性证据的生成,并加强以价值为基础的医疗保健的实施。
{"title":"Measuring Signs of Atopic Dermatitis in Clinical Practice: A HOME-CP Consensus Statement.","authors":"Michael E Jacobson, Yael A Leshem, Christian Apfelbacher, Phyllis I Spuls, Louise A A Gerbens, Kim S Thomas, Hywel C Williams, Norito Katoh, Laura Howells, Jochen Schmitt, Stefanie Deckert, Rishi Seshadri, Eric L Simpson","doi":"10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.1162","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.1162","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Outcome measurement is an essential component of value-based health care and can aid patient care, quality improvement, and clinical effectiveness evidence generation. The Harmonising Outcome Measures for Eczema Clinical Practice initiative aims to identify a list of validated, feasible, outcome measurement instruments recommended to measure atopic dermatitis (AD) in the clinical practice setting. The clinical practice set is a list of instruments that clinicians can pick and choose from to suit their needs in the context of clinical care.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To recommend instruments to measure clinical signs of AD in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Evidence review: </strong>Following the predefined roadmap, a mixed methods design was implemented and incorporated systematic reviews and qualitative consensus methods. Previous systematic reviews identified few clinical signs instruments with sufficient validation for recommendation. An updated systematic review evaluating the validity of clinical signs instruments informed an international meeting to reach consensus on recommended instruments to measure AD clinical signs in clinical practice. Consensus was defined as less than 30% disagreement. An in-person consensus exercise was held in Montreal, Canada, on October 16, 2022. The 34 attendees included patient and patient advocate research partners, health care professionals, researchers, methodologists, and industry representatives.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The updated systematic review found that the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), Scoring Atopic Dermatitis, and objective Scoring Atopic Dermatitis were the only instruments that demonstrated sufficient performance in all assessed measurement properties. The modified EASI and Signs Global Assessment × Body Surface Area instruments were also recommended. The EASI, Validated Investigator Global Assessment, and Investigator's Global Assessment multiplied by or measured concurrently with a body surface area measure achieved consensus in criteria and were adopted.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>This consensus statement by the Harmonising Outcome Measures for Eczema initiative suggests that when assessing and documenting clinical signs of AD, there are several valid and feasible instruments that can best fit a clinician's specific practice needs. These instruments should improve and standardize the documentation of signs severity, help determine the effect of treatment, facilitate the generation of clinical effectiveness evidence, and enhance the implementation of value-based health care.</p>","PeriodicalId":14734,"journal":{"name":"JAMA dermatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":11.5,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141076121","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Tuberculous Mastitis. 结核性乳腺炎
IF 11.5 1区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.1838
Estefania Boland-Rodríguez, José Luis Parra-Herrera, Irasema Romero-González
{"title":"Tuberculous Mastitis.","authors":"Estefania Boland-Rodríguez, José Luis Parra-Herrera, Irasema Romero-González","doi":"10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.1838","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.1838","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14734,"journal":{"name":"JAMA dermatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":11.5,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141491939","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Prevalence and Treatment Patterns in Patients With Lichen Planopilaris. 扁平苔藓患者的患病率和治疗模式。
IF 11.5 1区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.1445
Natalia Pelet Del Toro, Andrew Strunk, Amit Garg, George Han

Importance: Lichen planopilaris (LPP) is a form of scarring alopecia associated with progressive, permanent hair loss. Symptoms range from burning pain to itching, also carrying substantial psychological morbidity. Yet, disease characteristics, pathophysiology, and effective treatment data are limited, making treatment a challenge.

Objective: To describe the prevalence and dermatologist-prescribed treatment patterns of LPP among US adults.

Design, setting, and participants: This cross-sectional study used the Explorys database. The prevalence analysis used a 15% random sample and identified US adults with LPP diagnoses between 2017 and 2019. The LPP treatment analysis included all patients with LPP diagnoses between 2016 and 2020 and a dermatologist encounter in the first year after diagnosis. Data were analyzed from January 2023 to April 2023.

Main outcomes and measures: The main outcomes of the prevalence analysis were the crude and standardized prevalence estimates of US adults with LPP across age, sex, and racial groups. The main outcomes of the treatment analysis were the frequency of LPP treatments within 1 year of diagnosis, and the number of patients who continued treatment beyond 1 year, switched treatments, and combined treatments.

Results: Among 1 466 832 eligible patients analyzed for prevalence, 241 patients had an LPP diagnosis (222 [92.1%] female; median [IQR] age, 64 [54-73] years). Standardized overall prevalence was 13.4 per 100 000 (95% CI, 11.7-15.1). In the treatment analysis, 991 patients had an LPP diagnosis (907 [91.5%] female; median (IQR) age, 60 [47-69] years). Most received at least 1 type of medication (635 [64.1%]), most frequently intralesional corticosteroids (370 [37.3%]) and topical corticosteroids (342 [34.5%]), followed by doxycycline (104 [10.5%]) and hydroxychloroquine (72 [7.3%]). Treatment continued beyond 1 year in 71 of 200 patients (35.5%) prescribed intralesional corticosteroids and 7 of 29 patients (24.1%) prescribed hydroxychloroquine. Treatment switching at 1 year occurred in 32 of 254 patients (12.6%) first prescribed an intralesional corticosteroid and in 44 of 194 (22.7%) first prescribed a topical corticosteroid. Combinations of 2 or 3 treatment types were given to 137 (13.8%) and 74 (7.5%) patients, respectively.

Conclusions and relevance: This cross-sectional study reported prevalence and treatment patterns for US adults with LPP in a representative sample. Most patients with LPP received treatment, and many received multiple treatment types and switched treatments, suggesting further research into medication selection offers clinical benefit.

重要性:扁平苔癣(LPP)是一种瘢痕性脱发,伴有进行性、永久性脱发。症状从灼痛到瘙痒不等,还伴有严重的心理疾病。然而,疾病特征、病理生理学和有效治疗数据都很有限,这使得治疗成为一项挑战:目的:描述美国成年人中睑板腺肥大症的发病率和皮肤科医生处方治疗模式:这项横断面研究使用了 Explorys 数据库。流行率分析使用了 15% 的随机样本,并确定了 2017 年至 2019 年期间诊断出 LPP 的美国成年人。LPP治疗分析包括所有在2016年至2020年期间确诊为LPP的患者,以及确诊后第一年内遇到皮肤科医生的患者。数据分析时间为 2023 年 1 月至 2023 年 4 月:患病率分析的主要结果是不同年龄、性别和种族的美国成人 LPP 患者的粗略和标准化患病率估计值。治疗分析的主要结果是确诊后 1 年内接受 LPP 治疗的频率,以及 1 年后继续治疗、更换治疗方法和合并治疗的患者人数:在 1 466 832 名符合患病率分析条件的患者中,有 241 名患者确诊为 LPP(女性 222 人 [92.1%];中位数 [IQR] 年龄 64 [54-73] 岁)。标准化总患病率为每 10 万人 13.4 例(95% CI,11.7-15.1)。在治疗分析中,991 名患者确诊为 LPP(907 [91.5%] 名女性;中位数(IQR)年龄为 60 [47-69] 岁)。大多数患者至少接受了一种药物治疗(635 [64.1%]),其中最常见的是皮质类固醇激素(370 [37.3%])和外用皮质类固醇激素(342 [34.5%]),其次是强力霉素(104 [10.5%])和羟氯喹(72 [7.3%])。在处方皮质类固醇激素的 200 例患者中,有 71 例(35.5%)的治疗持续了 1 年,在处方羟氯喹的 29 例患者中,有 7 例(24.1%)的治疗持续了 1 年。在 254 例首次使用皮质类固醇激素的患者中,有 32 例(12.6%)在 1 年后更换了治疗方法;在 194 例首次使用外用皮质类固醇激素的患者中,有 44 例(22.7%)在 1 年后更换了治疗方法。分别有 137 名(13.8%)和 74 名(7.5%)患者接受了 2 种或 3 种治疗类型的组合:这项横断面研究报告了具有代表性的美国成人狼疮患者的患病率和治疗模式。大多数 LPP 患者接受了治疗,许多患者接受了多种治疗类型并更换了治疗方法,这表明对药物选择的进一步研究会带来临床益处。
{"title":"Prevalence and Treatment Patterns in Patients With Lichen Planopilaris.","authors":"Natalia Pelet Del Toro, Andrew Strunk, Amit Garg, George Han","doi":"10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.1445","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.1445","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Lichen planopilaris (LPP) is a form of scarring alopecia associated with progressive, permanent hair loss. Symptoms range from burning pain to itching, also carrying substantial psychological morbidity. Yet, disease characteristics, pathophysiology, and effective treatment data are limited, making treatment a challenge.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the prevalence and dermatologist-prescribed treatment patterns of LPP among US adults.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This cross-sectional study used the Explorys database. The prevalence analysis used a 15% random sample and identified US adults with LPP diagnoses between 2017 and 2019. The LPP treatment analysis included all patients with LPP diagnoses between 2016 and 2020 and a dermatologist encounter in the first year after diagnosis. Data were analyzed from January 2023 to April 2023.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The main outcomes of the prevalence analysis were the crude and standardized prevalence estimates of US adults with LPP across age, sex, and racial groups. The main outcomes of the treatment analysis were the frequency of LPP treatments within 1 year of diagnosis, and the number of patients who continued treatment beyond 1 year, switched treatments, and combined treatments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1 466 832 eligible patients analyzed for prevalence, 241 patients had an LPP diagnosis (222 [92.1%] female; median [IQR] age, 64 [54-73] years). Standardized overall prevalence was 13.4 per 100 000 (95% CI, 11.7-15.1). In the treatment analysis, 991 patients had an LPP diagnosis (907 [91.5%] female; median (IQR) age, 60 [47-69] years). Most received at least 1 type of medication (635 [64.1%]), most frequently intralesional corticosteroids (370 [37.3%]) and topical corticosteroids (342 [34.5%]), followed by doxycycline (104 [10.5%]) and hydroxychloroquine (72 [7.3%]). Treatment continued beyond 1 year in 71 of 200 patients (35.5%) prescribed intralesional corticosteroids and 7 of 29 patients (24.1%) prescribed hydroxychloroquine. Treatment switching at 1 year occurred in 32 of 254 patients (12.6%) first prescribed an intralesional corticosteroid and in 44 of 194 (22.7%) first prescribed a topical corticosteroid. Combinations of 2 or 3 treatment types were given to 137 (13.8%) and 74 (7.5%) patients, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>This cross-sectional study reported prevalence and treatment patterns for US adults with LPP in a representative sample. Most patients with LPP received treatment, and many received multiple treatment types and switched treatments, suggesting further research into medication selection offers clinical benefit.</p>","PeriodicalId":14734,"journal":{"name":"JAMA dermatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":11.5,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11170449/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141306019","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Worst Itch Numeric Rating Scale for Prurigo Nodularis: A Secondary Analysis of 2 Randomized Clinical Trials. 治疗结节性瘙痒症的最差瘙痒数字评分量表:两项随机临床试验的二次分析。
IF 11.5 1区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.1634
Shawn G Kwatra, Gil Yosipovitch, Brian Kim, Sonja Stander, Stephanie Rhoten, Cristina Ivanescu, Nadine Haeusler, Ella Brookes, Jerome Msihid, Melanie Makhija, Ashish Bansal, Ryan B Thomas, Donia Bahloul

Importance: Prurigo nodularis (PN) is a debilitating skin disease characterized by the hallmark symptom of chronic itch; the intensity of itch in PN was assessed using the Worst Itch Numeric Rating Scale (WI-NRS) to evaluate the primary efficacy end point of 2 recent phase 3 studies of dupilumab treatment for PN.

Objective: To validate the psychometric properties and to determine the clinically meaningful improvement threshold for WI-NRS in patients with moderate to severe PN.

Design, setting, and participants: In this secondary analysis of the PRIME and PRIME2 trials, content validity of WI-NRS was assessed through in-depth patient interviews. Psychometric assessments used pooled data from masked, intention-to-treat (ITT) patients with PN from randomized, double-masked, and placebo-controlled studies. Psychometric assessments included test-retest reliability, construct validity, known-groups validity, and sensitivity to change in adult patients with moderate-to-severe PN. Thresholds for meaningful within-patient improvement in the WI-NRS score were determined using anchor and distribution-based approaches. Data were analyzed after completion of each study, December 2019 to November 2021 for PRIME and January 2020 to August 2021 for PRIME2.

Exposures: Dupilumab (300 mg) or placebo subcutaneously every 2 weeks for 24 weeks.

Main outcomes and measures: WI-NRS score at specified time points up to 24 weeks after randomization.

Results: A total of 20 patients were included across the 2 studies (mean [SD] age, 49.3 [17.2] years; 11 female [55%]); 311 patients were included in the pooled intention-to-treat analysis (mean [SD] age, 49.5 [16.1] years; 203 female [65.3%]). The WI-NRS questions (20 of 20 patients), recall period (19 of 20 patients), and response scale (20 of 20 patients) were easy to understand and relevant for patients with PN. Adequate test-retest reliability was observed between screening and baseline (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.72, using Patient Global Impression of Severity [PGIS] to define stable patients). Convergent and discriminant validity was supported by moderate to strong correlations (absolute r range = 0.34-0.73) with other conceptually related measures and weaker correlations (absolute r range = 0.06-0.32) with less-related measures, respectively. WI-NRS was sensitive to change, as demonstrated by differences in change from baseline among groups (per PGIS change and PGI of Change [PGIC]). Using anchor-based approach with PGIS and PGIC, the clinically meaningful improvement threshold was 4 points (range, 3.0-4.5), which was also supported by distribution-based methods.

Conclusion and relevance: This study found that WI-NRS may be a fit-for-purpose instrument to support efficacy end points measuring the intensity of itching in adults with PN.

Tri

重要性:结节性瘙痒症(PN)是一种使人衰弱的皮肤病,其特征性症状是慢性瘙痒;使用最严重瘙痒数字评定量表(WI-NRS)对PN的瘙痒强度进行评估,以评价最近进行的2项杜比鲁单抗治疗PN的3期研究的主要疗效终点:验证WI-NRS的心理测量学特性,并确定WI-NRS对中重度PN患者有临床意义的改善阈值:在这项对 PRIME 和 PRIME2 试验的二次分析中,通过对患者的深入访谈评估了 WI-NRS 的内容效度。心理测量评估使用了来自随机、双掩蔽和安慰剂对照研究的蒙面、意向治疗(ITT)PN 患者的汇总数据。心理测量评估包括中重度 PN 成年患者的重复测试可靠性、结构有效性、已知组有效性和对变化的敏感性。采用基于锚和分布的方法确定了患者内部 WI-NRS 评分有意义改善的阈值。数据在每项研究完成后进行分析,PRIME 为 2019 年 12 月至 2021 年 11 月,PRIME2 为 2020 年 1 月至 2021 年 8 月:主要结果和测量指标:主要结果和测量指标:随机分组后24周内指定时间点的WI-NRS评分:两项研究共纳入了20名患者(平均[标码]年龄为49.3[17.2]岁;11名女性[55%]);311名患者纳入了合并意向治疗分析(平均[标码]年龄为49.5[16.1]岁;203名女性[65.3%])。WI-NRS问题(20名患者中的20名)、回忆期(20名患者中的19名)和反应量表(20名患者中的20名)易于理解,且与PN患者相关。在筛查和基线之间观察到了充分的重复测试可靠性(类内相关系数 = 0.72,使用患者对严重程度的总体印象 [PGIS] 来定义稳定的患者)。WI-NRS与其他概念相关的测量指标之间存在中度到高度的相关性(绝对r范围=0.34-0.73),而与相关性较低的测量指标之间则存在较弱的相关性(绝对r范围=0.06-0.32),这证明了其具有收敛性和区分性。WI-NRS 对变化很敏感,各组间与基线相比的变化差异(按 PGIS 变化和 PGI of Change [PGIC])就证明了这一点。使用基于锚的 PGIS 和 PGIC 方法,有临床意义的改善阈值为 4 点(范围为 3.0-4.5),这也得到了基于分布的方法的支持:本研究发现,WI-NRS 可能是一种适合用于支持疗效终点的工具,可用于测量成人 PN 患者的瘙痒强度:试验注册:NCT04183335(PRIME)和 NCT04202679(PRIME2)。
{"title":"Worst Itch Numeric Rating Scale for Prurigo Nodularis: A Secondary Analysis of 2 Randomized Clinical Trials.","authors":"Shawn G Kwatra, Gil Yosipovitch, Brian Kim, Sonja Stander, Stephanie Rhoten, Cristina Ivanescu, Nadine Haeusler, Ella Brookes, Jerome Msihid, Melanie Makhija, Ashish Bansal, Ryan B Thomas, Donia Bahloul","doi":"10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.1634","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.1634","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Prurigo nodularis (PN) is a debilitating skin disease characterized by the hallmark symptom of chronic itch; the intensity of itch in PN was assessed using the Worst Itch Numeric Rating Scale (WI-NRS) to evaluate the primary efficacy end point of 2 recent phase 3 studies of dupilumab treatment for PN.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To validate the psychometric properties and to determine the clinically meaningful improvement threshold for WI-NRS in patients with moderate to severe PN.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>In this secondary analysis of the PRIME and PRIME2 trials, content validity of WI-NRS was assessed through in-depth patient interviews. Psychometric assessments used pooled data from masked, intention-to-treat (ITT) patients with PN from randomized, double-masked, and placebo-controlled studies. Psychometric assessments included test-retest reliability, construct validity, known-groups validity, and sensitivity to change in adult patients with moderate-to-severe PN. Thresholds for meaningful within-patient improvement in the WI-NRS score were determined using anchor and distribution-based approaches. Data were analyzed after completion of each study, December 2019 to November 2021 for PRIME and January 2020 to August 2021 for PRIME2.</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>Dupilumab (300 mg) or placebo subcutaneously every 2 weeks for 24 weeks.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>WI-NRS score at specified time points up to 24 weeks after randomization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 20 patients were included across the 2 studies (mean [SD] age, 49.3 [17.2] years; 11 female [55%]); 311 patients were included in the pooled intention-to-treat analysis (mean [SD] age, 49.5 [16.1] years; 203 female [65.3%]). The WI-NRS questions (20 of 20 patients), recall period (19 of 20 patients), and response scale (20 of 20 patients) were easy to understand and relevant for patients with PN. Adequate test-retest reliability was observed between screening and baseline (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.72, using Patient Global Impression of Severity [PGIS] to define stable patients). Convergent and discriminant validity was supported by moderate to strong correlations (absolute r range = 0.34-0.73) with other conceptually related measures and weaker correlations (absolute r range = 0.06-0.32) with less-related measures, respectively. WI-NRS was sensitive to change, as demonstrated by differences in change from baseline among groups (per PGIS change and PGI of Change [PGIC]). Using anchor-based approach with PGIS and PGIC, the clinically meaningful improvement threshold was 4 points (range, 3.0-4.5), which was also supported by distribution-based methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and relevance: </strong>This study found that WI-NRS may be a fit-for-purpose instrument to support efficacy end points measuring the intensity of itching in adults with PN.</p><p><strong>Tri","PeriodicalId":14734,"journal":{"name":"JAMA dermatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":11.5,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11170455/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141306022","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cendakimab in Patients With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial. 用于中度至重度特应性皮炎患者的仙达昔单抗:随机临床试验
IF 11.5 1区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.2131
Andrew Blauvelt, Emma Guttman-Yassky, Charles Lynde, Saakshi Khattri, Joel Schlessinger, Shinichi Imafuku, Yayoi Tada, Akimichi Morita, Marni Wiseman, Bartlomiej Kwiek, Martina Machkova, Peijin Zhang, Misti Linaberry, Jie Li, Sandra Zhang, Giovanni Franchin, Edgar D Charles, Claudia H M C De Oliveira, Jonathan I Silverberg

Importance: Cendakimab selectively targets interleukin (IL)-13, a type 2 cytokine implicated in atopic dermatitis (AD) pathogenesis, by inhibiting binding to its receptors (IL13R-α1 and IL13R-α2). Proof-of-concept work in AD supports using cendakimab for type 2 inflammatory diseases.

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of cendakimab compared with placebo in patients with moderate to severe AD.

Design, setting, and participants: This phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, dose-ranging clinical trial was conducted from May 2021 to November 2022. Adult patients with moderate to severe AD and inadequate response to topical medications were enrolled at 69 sites in 5 countries (US [n = 26], Japan [n = 17], Canada [n = 9], Poland [n = 9], and Czech Republic [n = 8]). Data were analyzed between April 25, 2023, and October 16, 2023.

Interventions: Patients were randomized (1:1:1:1) to receive subcutaneous cendakimab, 360 mg, every 2 weeks; 720 mg, every 2 weeks; 720 mg, once weekly; or placebo.

Main outcome and measure: Mean percentage change in Eczema Area and Severity Index scores from baseline to week 16. Hierarchical testing with multiplicity adjustment was performed for 720 mg, once weekly vs placebo, then 720 mg, every 2 weeks vs placebo, and then 360 mg, every 2 weeks vs placebo.

Results: Overall, 221 patients were randomized, and 220 received study drug (95 women [43%]; mean [SD] age, 37.7 [13.9] years; 720 mg, once weekly [54 (24%)]; 720 mg, every 2 weeks [55 (25%)]; 360 mg, every 2 weeks [55 (25%)]; placebo [56 (26%)]). The primary efficacy end point was met for cendakimab, 720 mg, once weekly vs placebo (-84.4 vs -62.7; P = .003) but missed statistical significance for 720 mg, every 2 weeks (-76.0 vs -62.7; P = .06). The treatment effect for 360 mg, every 2 weeks (-16.3; nominal P = .03 vs placebo) was comparable with 720 mg, once weekly (-21.8); however, significance was not claimed because the hierarchical testing sequence was interrupted. Of patients with treatment-emergent adverse events leading to discontinuation, 4 (7.4%) received 720 mg, once weekly; 2 (3.6%) 720 mg, every 2 weeks; 1 (1.8%) 360 mg, every 2 weeks; and 2 (3.6%) placebo.

Conclusions and relevance: The results of this randomized clinical trial indicated that cendakimab was effective, generally safe, and well-tolerated in patients with moderate to severe AD. The primary end point was met with a significant reduction in Eczema Area and Severity Index scores with 720 mg, once weekly at week 16. Cendakimab demonstrated progressive AD improvement at all doses during 16 weeks of treatment.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04800315.

重要意义仙达单抗通过抑制白细胞介素(IL)-13受体(IL13R-α1和IL13R-α2)的结合,选择性地靶向白细胞介素(IL)-13,这是一种与特应性皮炎(AD)发病机制有关的2型细胞因子。AD的概念验证工作支持将仙达单抗用于2型炎症性疾病:评估仙达单抗与安慰剂相比对中重度AD患者的疗效和安全性:该2期随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、平行组、剂量范围临床试验于2021年5月至2022年11月进行。5个国家(美国[n = 26]、日本[n = 17]、加拿大[n = 9]、波兰[n = 9]和捷克共和国[n = 8])的69个研究机构招募了中度至重度AD且对局部药物反应不充分的成人患者。数据分析时间为 2023 年 4 月 25 日至 2023 年 10 月 16 日:患者随机(1:1:1:1:1)接受皮下注射仙达单抗,360 毫克,每两周一次;720 毫克,每两周一次;720 毫克,每周一次;或安慰剂。主要结果和测量:湿疹面积和严重程度指数评分从基线到第 16 周的平均百分比变化。对720毫克(每周1次)与安慰剂、720毫克(每2周1次)与安慰剂、360毫克(每2周1次)与安慰剂进行了多重性调整的层次测试:共有 221 名患者接受了随机治疗,其中 220 人接受了研究药物(95 名女性 [43%];平均 [SD] 年龄 37.7 [13.9] 岁;720 毫克,每周一次 [54 (24%)];720 毫克,每两周一次 [55 (25%)];360 毫克,每两周一次 [55 (25%)];安慰剂 [56 (26%)])。仙达单抗(720 毫克,每周一次 vs 安慰剂)达到了主要疗效终点(-84.4 vs -62.7;P = .003),但 720 毫克,每两周一次(-76.0 vs -62.7;P = .06)未达到统计学意义。360毫克,每两周一次的治疗效果(-16.3;与安慰剂相比,标称P = .03)与720毫克,每周一次的治疗效果(-21.8)相当;但是,由于分层测试序列中断,因此未获得显著性。在出现导致停药的治疗突发不良事件的患者中,4 人(7.4%)接受了每周一次的 720 毫克治疗;2 人(3.6%)接受了每两周一次的 720 毫克治疗;1 人(1.8%)接受了每两周一次的 360 毫克治疗;2 人(3.6%)接受了安慰剂治疗:这项随机临床试验的结果表明,仙达单抗对中度至重度AD患者有效、总体安全且耐受性良好。在第16周时,720毫克(每周一次)的湿疹面积和严重程度指数评分显著降低,达到了主要终点。在16周的治疗中,所有剂量的Cendakimab都能逐步改善AD:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:NCT04800315。
{"title":"Cendakimab in Patients With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Andrew Blauvelt, Emma Guttman-Yassky, Charles Lynde, Saakshi Khattri, Joel Schlessinger, Shinichi Imafuku, Yayoi Tada, Akimichi Morita, Marni Wiseman, Bartlomiej Kwiek, Martina Machkova, Peijin Zhang, Misti Linaberry, Jie Li, Sandra Zhang, Giovanni Franchin, Edgar D Charles, Claudia H M C De Oliveira, Jonathan I Silverberg","doi":"10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.2131","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.2131","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Cendakimab selectively targets interleukin (IL)-13, a type 2 cytokine implicated in atopic dermatitis (AD) pathogenesis, by inhibiting binding to its receptors (IL13R-α1 and IL13R-α2). Proof-of-concept work in AD supports using cendakimab for type 2 inflammatory diseases.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of cendakimab compared with placebo in patients with moderate to severe AD.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, dose-ranging clinical trial was conducted from May 2021 to November 2022. Adult patients with moderate to severe AD and inadequate response to topical medications were enrolled at 69 sites in 5 countries (US [n = 26], Japan [n = 17], Canada [n = 9], Poland [n = 9], and Czech Republic [n = 8]). Data were analyzed between April 25, 2023, and October 16, 2023.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Patients were randomized (1:1:1:1) to receive subcutaneous cendakimab, 360 mg, every 2 weeks; 720 mg, every 2 weeks; 720 mg, once weekly; or placebo.</p><p><strong>Main outcome and measure: </strong>Mean percentage change in Eczema Area and Severity Index scores from baseline to week 16. Hierarchical testing with multiplicity adjustment was performed for 720 mg, once weekly vs placebo, then 720 mg, every 2 weeks vs placebo, and then 360 mg, every 2 weeks vs placebo.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 221 patients were randomized, and 220 received study drug (95 women [43%]; mean [SD] age, 37.7 [13.9] years; 720 mg, once weekly [54 (24%)]; 720 mg, every 2 weeks [55 (25%)]; 360 mg, every 2 weeks [55 (25%)]; placebo [56 (26%)]). The primary efficacy end point was met for cendakimab, 720 mg, once weekly vs placebo (-84.4 vs -62.7; P = .003) but missed statistical significance for 720 mg, every 2 weeks (-76.0 vs -62.7; P = .06). The treatment effect for 360 mg, every 2 weeks (-16.3; nominal P = .03 vs placebo) was comparable with 720 mg, once weekly (-21.8); however, significance was not claimed because the hierarchical testing sequence was interrupted. Of patients with treatment-emergent adverse events leading to discontinuation, 4 (7.4%) received 720 mg, once weekly; 2 (3.6%) 720 mg, every 2 weeks; 1 (1.8%) 360 mg, every 2 weeks; and 2 (3.6%) placebo.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>The results of this randomized clinical trial indicated that cendakimab was effective, generally safe, and well-tolerated in patients with moderate to severe AD. The primary end point was met with a significant reduction in Eczema Area and Severity Index scores with 720 mg, once weekly at week 16. Cendakimab demonstrated progressive AD improvement at all doses during 16 weeks of treatment.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04800315.</p>","PeriodicalId":14734,"journal":{"name":"JAMA dermatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":11.5,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11255973/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141626751","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
JAMA Dermatology. JAMA Dermatology.
IF 11.5 1区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2023.3996
{"title":"JAMA Dermatology.","authors":"","doi":"10.1001/jamadermatol.2023.3996","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2023.3996","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14734,"journal":{"name":"JAMA dermatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":11.5,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142017561","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Destructive Midfacial Mass in a Middle-Aged Man. 一名中年男子的面中部破坏性肿块
IF 11.5 1区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.0969
Ruixin Deng, Ruoyu Li, Xiaowen Wang
{"title":"A Destructive Midfacial Mass in a Middle-Aged Man.","authors":"Ruixin Deng, Ruoyu Li, Xiaowen Wang","doi":"10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.0969","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.0969","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14734,"journal":{"name":"JAMA dermatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":11.5,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141159999","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
JAMA dermatology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1