Pub Date : 2026-03-17DOI: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000001681
Max Spaderna, Cecilia Bergeria
Since 2000, the suicide rate from opioid overdoses has more than doubled, and the number of self-reported intentional opioid overdoses is likely undercounted. This commentary discusses how a sensitive and validated assessment is crucially needed to identify those at risk for intentional opioid overdose. Developing this, however, requires an understanding of the affective, cognitive, and behavioral factors that uniquely contribute to this phenomenon. These include higher prevalences of psychiatric diagnoses and pain in the opioid use disorder (OUD) population; a deleterious negative emotional state that occurs with chronic opioid use; and risky opioid-use patterns worsened by the introduction of fentanyl into the illicit opioid supply that give individuals with OUD easy access to lethal means for dying by suicide. Although there is an urgent need to identify intentional opioid overdose risk, previous research has shown that validated screening tools for suicide risk, which ask about previous suicide attempts, may not detect all those at risk for intentional opioid overdose. This may be because the intent preceding opioid overdoses is ambiguous, making it challenging for individuals with OUD to identify these as suicide attempts. Because validated screening tools for suicide risk are insufficient for detecting intentional opioid overdose risk, a screening tool developed specifically for this purpose using validated psychometric methods is necessary to identify and intervene in the morbidity and mortality associated with intentional opioid overdose.
{"title":"Detecting Suicidality in Opioid Use Disorder Requires an Understanding of Intentional Opioid Overdose.","authors":"Max Spaderna, Cecilia Bergeria","doi":"10.1097/ADM.0000000000001681","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ADM.0000000000001681","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Since 2000, the suicide rate from opioid overdoses has more than doubled, and the number of self-reported intentional opioid overdoses is likely undercounted. This commentary discusses how a sensitive and validated assessment is crucially needed to identify those at risk for intentional opioid overdose. Developing this, however, requires an understanding of the affective, cognitive, and behavioral factors that uniquely contribute to this phenomenon. These include higher prevalences of psychiatric diagnoses and pain in the opioid use disorder (OUD) population; a deleterious negative emotional state that occurs with chronic opioid use; and risky opioid-use patterns worsened by the introduction of fentanyl into the illicit opioid supply that give individuals with OUD easy access to lethal means for dying by suicide. Although there is an urgent need to identify intentional opioid overdose risk, previous research has shown that validated screening tools for suicide risk, which ask about previous suicide attempts, may not detect all those at risk for intentional opioid overdose. This may be because the intent preceding opioid overdoses is ambiguous, making it challenging for individuals with OUD to identify these as suicide attempts. Because validated screening tools for suicide risk are insufficient for detecting intentional opioid overdose risk, a screening tool developed specifically for this purpose using validated psychometric methods is necessary to identify and intervene in the morbidity and mortality associated with intentional opioid overdose.</p>","PeriodicalId":14744,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Addiction Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2026-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147467997","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-17DOI: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000001684
Gregory T Woods, Hannah Shadowen, Caroline Shadowen, Caitlin E Martin
Objectives: Buprenorphine is a partial opioid agonist used in the treatment of opioid use disorder. Dosing of buprenorphine is determined clinically, with peripartum adjustments often indicated due to physiological and psychosocial changes in pregnancy and the postpartum period. We sought to describe these postpartum dose changes, how adjustments varied across demographics, and their association with treatment retention.
Methods: This is a retrospective, descriptive analysis of antenatal buprenorphine initiations at one academic institution over 2 years. The primary outcome of interest was the difference in buprenorphine dose at 3 months postpartum compared with the delivery dose.
Results: Sixty-six individuals were included in this study. The majority (36/66; 55%) had no change in buprenorphine dose between delivery and 3 months postpartum. One-third of patients had their dose increased postpartum, with a minority of individuals (8/66; 12%) reducing their dose postpartum. Individuals who were incarcerated at the time of delivery were more likely to experience a dose reduction (P = 0.045). There was no significant difference in treatment retention at 1 year postpartum between the groups.
Conclusions: Our data suggest heterogeneity in the management of buprenorphine dosing in the postpartum period. The vast majority (58/66; 88%) of patients either increased or maintained their total daily dose between delivery and 3 months postpartum. These results underscore the importance of an individualized approach to postpartum buprenorphine, factoring in delivery dose, biopsychosocial factors, and risk of return to use and overdose. Future qualitative work is needed to explore the dynamic patient and provider priorities at play in this decision-making.
{"title":"Postpartum Buprenorphine: A Descriptive Analysis of Dose Adjustments and Treatment Retention.","authors":"Gregory T Woods, Hannah Shadowen, Caroline Shadowen, Caitlin E Martin","doi":"10.1097/ADM.0000000000001684","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ADM.0000000000001684","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Buprenorphine is a partial opioid agonist used in the treatment of opioid use disorder. Dosing of buprenorphine is determined clinically, with peripartum adjustments often indicated due to physiological and psychosocial changes in pregnancy and the postpartum period. We sought to describe these postpartum dose changes, how adjustments varied across demographics, and their association with treatment retention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective, descriptive analysis of antenatal buprenorphine initiations at one academic institution over 2 years. The primary outcome of interest was the difference in buprenorphine dose at 3 months postpartum compared with the delivery dose.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-six individuals were included in this study. The majority (36/66; 55%) had no change in buprenorphine dose between delivery and 3 months postpartum. One-third of patients had their dose increased postpartum, with a minority of individuals (8/66; 12%) reducing their dose postpartum. Individuals who were incarcerated at the time of delivery were more likely to experience a dose reduction (P = 0.045). There was no significant difference in treatment retention at 1 year postpartum between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our data suggest heterogeneity in the management of buprenorphine dosing in the postpartum period. The vast majority (58/66; 88%) of patients either increased or maintained their total daily dose between delivery and 3 months postpartum. These results underscore the importance of an individualized approach to postpartum buprenorphine, factoring in delivery dose, biopsychosocial factors, and risk of return to use and overdose. Future qualitative work is needed to explore the dynamic patient and provider priorities at play in this decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":14744,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Addiction Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2026-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147468022","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-17DOI: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000001683
Madeline B Benz, Michael D Stein, Camille Clifford, Brandon A Gaudiano
Despite a recent decline in overdose deaths, the United States continues to have the highest global overdose mortality rate. Polysubstance use-taking opioids along with other drugs-has been increasingly recognized as a key contributor to preventable overdose cases. We propose that psychotropic polypharmacy, or the co-use of multiple psychiatric medications, is emerging as a related but distinct and underappreciated issue that is crucial for continued progress in slowing the pace of the overdose epidemic. This commentary aims to center psychotropic polypharmacy in the overdose prevention conversation, given its high rates in the United States and an increasing prevalence of psychiatric prescription medications implicated in overdose deaths. We present evidence for multiple mechanisms through which psychotropic polypharmacy increases overdose risk, including drug-drug interactions, lethal means access in cases of suicidality, and desensitization to overdose-related behaviors. We also propose several potential solutions to address this public health crisis, including discontinuing inappropriate and unnecessary medications, broadening access to evidence-based nonpharmacological prevention strategies for persons at risk for overdose, and improving overdose monitoring and surveillance.
{"title":"Too Many Pills, Too Little Attention: Emphasizing Psychotropic Polypharmacy in the Overdose Conversation.","authors":"Madeline B Benz, Michael D Stein, Camille Clifford, Brandon A Gaudiano","doi":"10.1097/ADM.0000000000001683","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ADM.0000000000001683","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite a recent decline in overdose deaths, the United States continues to have the highest global overdose mortality rate. Polysubstance use-taking opioids along with other drugs-has been increasingly recognized as a key contributor to preventable overdose cases. We propose that psychotropic polypharmacy, or the co-use of multiple psychiatric medications, is emerging as a related but distinct and underappreciated issue that is crucial for continued progress in slowing the pace of the overdose epidemic. This commentary aims to center psychotropic polypharmacy in the overdose prevention conversation, given its high rates in the United States and an increasing prevalence of psychiatric prescription medications implicated in overdose deaths. We present evidence for multiple mechanisms through which psychotropic polypharmacy increases overdose risk, including drug-drug interactions, lethal means access in cases of suicidality, and desensitization to overdose-related behaviors. We also propose several potential solutions to address this public health crisis, including discontinuing inappropriate and unnecessary medications, broadening access to evidence-based nonpharmacological prevention strategies for persons at risk for overdose, and improving overdose monitoring and surveillance.</p>","PeriodicalId":14744,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Addiction Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2026-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147467992","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objectives: This study assesses treatment initiation and retention among South Carolina Medicaid enrollees newly diagnosed with opioid use disorder in 2021, situating these outcomes within the broader opioid treatment cascade of care. We examine how patient characteristics and community context shape progression through the stages of the cascade.
Methods: Using South Carolina Medicaid claims data for 464,493 enrollees aged 18-64 in 2021, we identify 2930 individuals newly diagnosed with OUD and examine initiation and 90-day retention in psychosocial and medication treatment. Generalized estimating equation models were used to estimate associations between treatment outcomes and sociodemographic and area-of-residence characteristics.
Results: Among newly diagnosed individuals, 34.6% initiated psychosocial treatment and 49.6% initiated medication treatment; 27.0% and 55.0%, respectively, were retained for at least 90 days. Non-Hispanic black enrollees had lower odds of initiating psychosocial (AOR = 0.72; 95% CI = 0.54-0.96) and medication treatment (AOR = 0.51; 95% CI = 0.44-0.58) compared with non-Hispanic white enrollees. Age differences were pronounced: enrollees aged 25-34 were more likely to initiate psychosocial treatment (AOR = 1.16; 95% CI = 1.00-1.35), while those aged 35-44 were more likely to initiate and retain medication treatment. Associations between treatment outcomes and county-level factors were not significant.
Conclusions: Rates of OUD treatment initiation and retention among South Carolina Medicaid enrollees remain low, with pronounced demographic variations. Findings highlight the need for targeted interventions to improve access and engagement in treatment.
目的:本研究评估了2021年新诊断为阿片类药物使用障碍的南卡罗来纳州医疗补助计划参保者的治疗开始和保留情况,将这些结果置于更广泛的阿片类药物治疗级联护理中。我们研究了患者特征和社区环境如何通过级联阶段塑造进展。方法:使用2021年南卡罗来纳州医疗补助计划464,493名18-64岁参保者的索赔数据,我们确定了2930名新诊断为OUD的个体,并检查了心理社会和药物治疗的开始和90天保留。使用广义估计方程模型来估计治疗结果与社会人口学和居住区域特征之间的关联。结果:在新诊断的个体中,34.6%开始了心理社会治疗,49.6%开始了药物治疗;保留90 d以上的分别为27.0%和55.0%。与非西班牙裔白人受试者相比,非西班牙裔黑人受试者启动心理社会治疗(AOR = 0.72; 95% CI = 0.54-0.96)和药物治疗(AOR = 0.51; 95% CI = 0.44-0.58)的几率较低。年龄差异明显:25-34岁的入组者更有可能开始心理社会治疗(AOR = 1.16; 95% CI = 1.00-1.35),而35-44岁的入组者更有可能开始并保持药物治疗。治疗结果与县级因素之间的关联不显著。结论:在南卡罗来纳医疗补助计划参保者中,OUD治疗的开始和保留率仍然很低,具有明显的人口统计学差异。调查结果强调需要有针对性的干预措施,以改善治疗的可及性和参与度。
{"title":"Treatment Initiation and Retention Among Medicaid Enrollees Diagnosed With Opioid Use Disorder in South Carolina.","authors":"Skylar Gross, Theodoros Giannouchos, Angela Rogers, Shujie Chen, Yichen Li, Jiajia Zhang, Bankole Olatosi, Christina Andrews","doi":"10.1097/ADM.0000000000001674","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ADM.0000000000001674","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study assesses treatment initiation and retention among South Carolina Medicaid enrollees newly diagnosed with opioid use disorder in 2021, situating these outcomes within the broader opioid treatment cascade of care. We examine how patient characteristics and community context shape progression through the stages of the cascade.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using South Carolina Medicaid claims data for 464,493 enrollees aged 18-64 in 2021, we identify 2930 individuals newly diagnosed with OUD and examine initiation and 90-day retention in psychosocial and medication treatment. Generalized estimating equation models were used to estimate associations between treatment outcomes and sociodemographic and area-of-residence characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among newly diagnosed individuals, 34.6% initiated psychosocial treatment and 49.6% initiated medication treatment; 27.0% and 55.0%, respectively, were retained for at least 90 days. Non-Hispanic black enrollees had lower odds of initiating psychosocial (AOR = 0.72; 95% CI = 0.54-0.96) and medication treatment (AOR = 0.51; 95% CI = 0.44-0.58) compared with non-Hispanic white enrollees. Age differences were pronounced: enrollees aged 25-34 were more likely to initiate psychosocial treatment (AOR = 1.16; 95% CI = 1.00-1.35), while those aged 35-44 were more likely to initiate and retain medication treatment. Associations between treatment outcomes and county-level factors were not significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Rates of OUD treatment initiation and retention among South Carolina Medicaid enrollees remain low, with pronounced demographic variations. Findings highlight the need for targeted interventions to improve access and engagement in treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":14744,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Addiction Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2026-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147473803","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-16DOI: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000001682
Sarah Kawasaki, Erik Lehman, Lan Kong, Angela Spangler, Nicole Aydingolo, Edward Nunes
Objectives: This study evaluated ReSET-O, a mobile app derived from the previously studied, computer-based therapeutic education system (TES), delivering cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) lessons plus contingency management, rewarding CBT lesson completion and drug-negative urines, as an intervention to improve medication retention for opioid use disorder (MOUD).
Methods: A 24-week randomized controlled trial was conducted in an outpatient opioid treatment program where patients starting methadone or buprenorphine treatment were randomized to treatment as usual (TAU) or TAU plus the app. The primary outcome, medication retention, was defined as at most a 28-day gap in the first 24 weeks of medication dispensation or prescription. Secondary outcomes examined urine drug tests, mood assessments, app engagement, and app feedback. Fifty-two participants were randomized to TAU (29 on buprenorphine, 23 on methadone) and 48 (28 on buprenorphine, 20 on methadone) to TAU+ the app.
Results: 51.9% (n=27) on TAU met 24-week MOUD medication retention, compared with 70.8% (n=34) on TAU + the app (OR: 2.28; 95% CI: [0.99, 5.24]); P=0.053; Rate difference: 18.9% (95% CI: [0.2, 37.6]). No significant differences resulted between groups in urine toxicology or mood outcomes. Adherence to the app varied, with over half of participants (53%, 25/48) completing <10 out of 48 CBT therapy lessons.
Conclusions: ReSET-O had no significant impact on MOUD retention. The study did not meet its recruitment target, was underpowered, and adherence to the app was poor. Further research is indicated on apps delivering CBT plus contingency management for improving MOUD outcomes, including improving adherence to app use.
{"title":"A Digital Therapeutic Mobile App, ReSET-O, as Adjunct to Medication Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial at an Opioid Treatment Program.","authors":"Sarah Kawasaki, Erik Lehman, Lan Kong, Angela Spangler, Nicole Aydingolo, Edward Nunes","doi":"10.1097/ADM.0000000000001682","DOIUrl":"10.1097/ADM.0000000000001682","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study evaluated ReSET-O, a mobile app derived from the previously studied, computer-based therapeutic education system (TES), delivering cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) lessons plus contingency management, rewarding CBT lesson completion and drug-negative urines, as an intervention to improve medication retention for opioid use disorder (MOUD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 24-week randomized controlled trial was conducted in an outpatient opioid treatment program where patients starting methadone or buprenorphine treatment were randomized to treatment as usual (TAU) or TAU plus the app. The primary outcome, medication retention, was defined as at most a 28-day gap in the first 24 weeks of medication dispensation or prescription. Secondary outcomes examined urine drug tests, mood assessments, app engagement, and app feedback. Fifty-two participants were randomized to TAU (29 on buprenorphine, 23 on methadone) and 48 (28 on buprenorphine, 20 on methadone) to TAU+ the app.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>51.9% (n=27) on TAU met 24-week MOUD medication retention, compared with 70.8% (n=34) on TAU + the app (OR: 2.28; 95% CI: [0.99, 5.24]); P=0.053; Rate difference: 18.9% (95% CI: [0.2, 37.6]). No significant differences resulted between groups in urine toxicology or mood outcomes. Adherence to the app varied, with over half of participants (53%, 25/48) completing <10 out of 48 CBT therapy lessons.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ReSET-O had no significant impact on MOUD retention. The study did not meet its recruitment target, was underpowered, and adherence to the app was poor. Further research is indicated on apps delivering CBT plus contingency management for improving MOUD outcomes, including improving adherence to app use.</p>","PeriodicalId":14744,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Addiction Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2026-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147463409","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-12DOI: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000001675
Payel Jhoom Roy, Nalingna Yuan, Yaming Li, Anne Mobley Butler, Katelin B Nickel, Gretchen Gibson, Colin C Hubbard, Taylor L Boyer, Katie J Suda, Michael J Durkin
Objectives: In 2022, the FDA issued a drug safety communication based on case studies that transmucosal buprenorphine, a medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD), may contribute to dental disease. We sought to assess longitudinal dental care utilization patterns among patients with opioid use disorder (OUD) in the 18 months before and 36 months after MOUD initiation.
Methods: Using data from the Veterans Affairs Corporate Data Warehouse (2003-2020), we created a cohort of patients coded for OUD and prescribed MOUD. Outcomes included preventive and therapeutic dental visits and oral infections within 18 months before and up to 36 months after index MOUD. We used unadjusted Poisson models to estimate incidence per 1000 patients by MOUD. We performed analyses with and without interval censoring for edentulism, death, or a 60-day gap in MOUD.
Results: Among 49,675 eligible patients, 21,551 received methadone, 17,759 transmucosal buprenorphine, 8993 oral naltrexone, and 1372 injectable naltrexone. Median (IQR) days on treatment varied by drug: methadone 95 (52, 257), buprenorphine 309 (102, 968), oral naltrexone 49 (30, 101), injectable naltrexone 28 (28, 85). We observed an immediate increase in dental visits from a baseline range of 135-144 visits/1000/6-month period to 223-686 visits/1000/6-month period after initiating any MOUD. Patterns were similar by MOUD agent and formulation. Results were similar in analyses with and without interval censoring.
Conclusions: Both preventive and therapeutic dental utilization increased immediately following initiation with MOUD. Future observational studies of the effects of MOUD on adverse dental outcomes should account for confounding due to health-seeking behavior.
{"title":"Longitudinal Patterns of Dental Health Care Utilization 18 Months Before and 36 Months After Initiation of Index Medications for Opioid Use Disorder.","authors":"Payel Jhoom Roy, Nalingna Yuan, Yaming Li, Anne Mobley Butler, Katelin B Nickel, Gretchen Gibson, Colin C Hubbard, Taylor L Boyer, Katie J Suda, Michael J Durkin","doi":"10.1097/ADM.0000000000001675","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ADM.0000000000001675","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In 2022, the FDA issued a drug safety communication based on case studies that transmucosal buprenorphine, a medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD), may contribute to dental disease. We sought to assess longitudinal dental care utilization patterns among patients with opioid use disorder (OUD) in the 18 months before and 36 months after MOUD initiation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using data from the Veterans Affairs Corporate Data Warehouse (2003-2020), we created a cohort of patients coded for OUD and prescribed MOUD. Outcomes included preventive and therapeutic dental visits and oral infections within 18 months before and up to 36 months after index MOUD. We used unadjusted Poisson models to estimate incidence per 1000 patients by MOUD. We performed analyses with and without interval censoring for edentulism, death, or a 60-day gap in MOUD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 49,675 eligible patients, 21,551 received methadone, 17,759 transmucosal buprenorphine, 8993 oral naltrexone, and 1372 injectable naltrexone. Median (IQR) days on treatment varied by drug: methadone 95 (52, 257), buprenorphine 309 (102, 968), oral naltrexone 49 (30, 101), injectable naltrexone 28 (28, 85). We observed an immediate increase in dental visits from a baseline range of 135-144 visits/1000/6-month period to 223-686 visits/1000/6-month period after initiating any MOUD. Patterns were similar by MOUD agent and formulation. Results were similar in analyses with and without interval censoring.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both preventive and therapeutic dental utilization increased immediately following initiation with MOUD. Future observational studies of the effects of MOUD on adverse dental outcomes should account for confounding due to health-seeking behavior.</p>","PeriodicalId":14744,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Addiction Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2026-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147433125","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-11DOI: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000001673
James R Langabeer, Andrea J Yatsco, Cohen A Sarah, Shabana Walia, Tiffany Champagne-Langabeer
Objectives: Treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD) is constrained by financial and geographic barriers. Community-based approaches may help address these challenges, yet evidence regarding their sustained impact on treatment retention and quality of life (QOL) remains limited. This study evaluated treatment retention and QOL outcomes in a community-based care coordination program for OUD.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of participants enrolled in the Houston Emergency Opioid Engagement System (HEROES), a community-based treatment program in the Texas Medical Center. From January 1, 2020, through December 31, 2024, 1124 participants received individualized treatment plans, including medical visits, counseling, peer support, and group services. The primary outcome was treatment retention at 90 days. As a secondary descriptive measure, mean days retained within a 180-day observation window were compared across service utilization categories using analysis of variance. Additional secondary outcomes included substance use reoccurrence, overdose, and mortality.
Results: Participants were 57.7% male with a mean age of 34.9 years (SD, 9.76); 62.8% were uninsured, and 63.6% had a prior overdose. At 90 days, 74.1% of participants remained in treatment. Mean days retained differed significantly across service utilization categories, with greater engagement associated with longer retention. Nearly 71% of participants reported improvements in QOL, with a mean increase of 13.2 points.
Conclusions: In this 5-year retrospective cohort study, greater participation in a community-based care coordination program for OUD was associated with improved treatment retention and quality of life. Strategies that increase patient engagement through counseling and peer support may improve outcomes.
{"title":"Community-based Care Coordination and Treatment Retention in Opioid Use Disorder: A 5-year Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"James R Langabeer, Andrea J Yatsco, Cohen A Sarah, Shabana Walia, Tiffany Champagne-Langabeer","doi":"10.1097/ADM.0000000000001673","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ADM.0000000000001673","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD) is constrained by financial and geographic barriers. Community-based approaches may help address these challenges, yet evidence regarding their sustained impact on treatment retention and quality of life (QOL) remains limited. This study evaluated treatment retention and QOL outcomes in a community-based care coordination program for OUD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study of participants enrolled in the Houston Emergency Opioid Engagement System (HEROES), a community-based treatment program in the Texas Medical Center. From January 1, 2020, through December 31, 2024, 1124 participants received individualized treatment plans, including medical visits, counseling, peer support, and group services. The primary outcome was treatment retention at 90 days. As a secondary descriptive measure, mean days retained within a 180-day observation window were compared across service utilization categories using analysis of variance. Additional secondary outcomes included substance use reoccurrence, overdose, and mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants were 57.7% male with a mean age of 34.9 years (SD, 9.76); 62.8% were uninsured, and 63.6% had a prior overdose. At 90 days, 74.1% of participants remained in treatment. Mean days retained differed significantly across service utilization categories, with greater engagement associated with longer retention. Nearly 71% of participants reported improvements in QOL, with a mean increase of 13.2 points.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this 5-year retrospective cohort study, greater participation in a community-based care coordination program for OUD was associated with improved treatment retention and quality of life. Strategies that increase patient engagement through counseling and peer support may improve outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":14744,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Addiction Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2026-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147433016","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-10DOI: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000001663
Xavier Alexander Calicdan, Anika Kopczynski, Edwin Medina, Samantha Singh, Diana Sotelo, Alexander Chen Wu, Joji Suzuki
Objectives: Kratom ( Mitragyna speciosa ) is a psychoactive herbal product increasingly used for pain, anxiety, and opioid withdrawal. Although marketed as a natural dietary product, concerns have emerged regarding adverse effects like cardiotoxicity, seizures, opioid-like physical dependence, and, particularly, liver toxicity.
Methods: We conducted a systematic review following PRISMA 2020 guidelines of all studies on kratom use and liver toxicity.
Results: Thirty-one studies were included, comprising 32 cases of kratom-associated liver injury. Most reports originated from the United States and were single-patient case reports. Most patients were adult males, with frequent co-occurrence of polysubstance use and comorbid conditions. Concomitant exposures were commonly reported but variably characterized across studies. Baseline liver disease was present in 3 patients (9%). Kratom dose, form, frequency, and duration were inconsistently reported. Only 7 cases (22%) provided complete exposure details, whereas the remainder lacked one or more elements. Kratom use was temporally associated with the onset of liver injury, commonly presenting with jaundice and elevations in liver enzymes. The patterns of injury were predominantly cholestatic. In most cases, liver enzymes and function improved after cessation of kratom use. In 4 cases, the patient's liver function did not improve and progressed to liver transplantation. Although formal causality assessments were inconsistently reported, many reports supported an association based on exclusion of alternative etiologies and, in some cases, rechallenge episodes.
Conclusions: Further research is needed to better characterize kratom's mechanisms of liver injury and to inform clinical decision-making and public health policy.
{"title":"Liver Injury Associated With Kratom ( Mitragyna speciosa ): A Systematic Review.","authors":"Xavier Alexander Calicdan, Anika Kopczynski, Edwin Medina, Samantha Singh, Diana Sotelo, Alexander Chen Wu, Joji Suzuki","doi":"10.1097/ADM.0000000000001663","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ADM.0000000000001663","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Kratom ( Mitragyna speciosa ) is a psychoactive herbal product increasingly used for pain, anxiety, and opioid withdrawal. Although marketed as a natural dietary product, concerns have emerged regarding adverse effects like cardiotoxicity, seizures, opioid-like physical dependence, and, particularly, liver toxicity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review following PRISMA 2020 guidelines of all studies on kratom use and liver toxicity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-one studies were included, comprising 32 cases of kratom-associated liver injury. Most reports originated from the United States and were single-patient case reports. Most patients were adult males, with frequent co-occurrence of polysubstance use and comorbid conditions. Concomitant exposures were commonly reported but variably characterized across studies. Baseline liver disease was present in 3 patients (9%). Kratom dose, form, frequency, and duration were inconsistently reported. Only 7 cases (22%) provided complete exposure details, whereas the remainder lacked one or more elements. Kratom use was temporally associated with the onset of liver injury, commonly presenting with jaundice and elevations in liver enzymes. The patterns of injury were predominantly cholestatic. In most cases, liver enzymes and function improved after cessation of kratom use. In 4 cases, the patient's liver function did not improve and progressed to liver transplantation. Although formal causality assessments were inconsistently reported, many reports supported an association based on exclusion of alternative etiologies and, in some cases, rechallenge episodes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Further research is needed to better characterize kratom's mechanisms of liver injury and to inform clinical decision-making and public health policy.</p>","PeriodicalId":14744,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Addiction Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2026-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147390145","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2025-06-23DOI: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000001523
Shelby A Powers, Noel Ivey, Dana Clifton, Rebecca Lumsden
Objectives: Peripartum opioid use disorder (OUD) is a significant public health concern. Although hospital admission for labor and delivery is common, little is known about hospitalized peripartum individuals with OUD or their inpatient management. The purpose of this study was to characterize hospitalized peripartum individuals with OUD who were seen by an OUD consult service and to examine their inpatient OUD treatment.
Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of peripartum individuals who received an OUD consult from May 2020 to April 2022. All individuals were pregnant or up to 3 months postpartum at admission. Substance use and psychosocial history were collected, along with timing and acceptance of medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) and details of discharge transitions.
Results: Of the 23 peripartum individuals with OUD who received a consult during admission, 61% were white, 30% were black, and all were non-Hispanic. Most individuals (78%) had Medicaid. Only 30% were using MOUD at hospital admission. Two-thirds (63%) of those not using MOUD were started on treatment during hospitalization, most commonly with buprenorphine-naloxone. At discharge, most (74%) individuals were connected to outpatient OUD treatment. Of the total, 35% self-directed their discharge, and there was a higher proportion of self-directed discharges among those who did not receive inpatient MOUD compared with those who did ( P < 0.01).
Conclusions: Hospitalization during the peripartum period is an important opportunity for initiation of MOUD and linkage to longitudinal, community OUD services. Further understanding of factors contributing to high rates of self-directed discharge in the peripartum period is needed.
{"title":"Management of Opioid Use Disorder Among Peripartum Individuals During Hospitalization.","authors":"Shelby A Powers, Noel Ivey, Dana Clifton, Rebecca Lumsden","doi":"10.1097/ADM.0000000000001523","DOIUrl":"10.1097/ADM.0000000000001523","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Peripartum opioid use disorder (OUD) is a significant public health concern. Although hospital admission for labor and delivery is common, little is known about hospitalized peripartum individuals with OUD or their inpatient management. The purpose of this study was to characterize hospitalized peripartum individuals with OUD who were seen by an OUD consult service and to examine their inpatient OUD treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study of peripartum individuals who received an OUD consult from May 2020 to April 2022. All individuals were pregnant or up to 3 months postpartum at admission. Substance use and psychosocial history were collected, along with timing and acceptance of medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) and details of discharge transitions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 23 peripartum individuals with OUD who received a consult during admission, 61% were white, 30% were black, and all were non-Hispanic. Most individuals (78%) had Medicaid. Only 30% were using MOUD at hospital admission. Two-thirds (63%) of those not using MOUD were started on treatment during hospitalization, most commonly with buprenorphine-naloxone. At discharge, most (74%) individuals were connected to outpatient OUD treatment. Of the total, 35% self-directed their discharge, and there was a higher proportion of self-directed discharges among those who did not receive inpatient MOUD compared with those who did ( P < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Hospitalization during the peripartum period is an important opportunity for initiation of MOUD and linkage to longitudinal, community OUD services. Further understanding of factors contributing to high rates of self-directed discharge in the peripartum period is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":14744,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Addiction Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"183-189"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144475294","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2025-08-11DOI: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000001569
Li Yan McCurdy, Annie Cheng, Marc N Potenza, Yihong Zhao
Objectives: Social support is associated with myriad health benefits, including recovery from alcohol use disorder (AUD). Understanding its neural features may aid in intervention development. However, most neuroimaging studies investigating social support do not consider potential neuroanatomical differences related to sex and AUD, even though both factors have been related to social support. This study investigated neuroanatomical correlates of perceived emotional and instrumental support as a function of sex and lifetime AUD using Human Connectome Project data.
Methods: T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging data were collected. Gray-matter volume in brain regions associated with social support was quantified in a large sample of young adults (522 women and 432 men) who did and did not have a lifetime AUD status. Perceived emotional and instrumental support were determined via self-report scales. Relationships between gray-matter volumes and perceived emotional/instrumental support were determined for each demographic category (women/men, lifetime AUD/no-AUD) via interaction analyses.
Results: Gray-matter volumes in 2 brain regions (left rostral anterior cingulate cortex and left lateral orbitofrontal cortex) were inversely associated with perceived emotional support in women with lifetime AUD, such that larger gray-matter volume was associated with lower perceived emotional support. This relationship was not observed in women without lifetime AUD or men with or without lifetime AUD. No associations were observed with instrumental support.
Conclusions: Women differ from men in brain-behavior relationships involving perceived emotional support in a manner linked to AUD status. Sex differences warrant further investigation as social support in AUD may operate differently in women and men.
{"title":"Sex Moderates Relationships Between Alcohol Use Disorder, Brain Structure, and Perceived Emotional Support in Young Adults.","authors":"Li Yan McCurdy, Annie Cheng, Marc N Potenza, Yihong Zhao","doi":"10.1097/ADM.0000000000001569","DOIUrl":"10.1097/ADM.0000000000001569","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Social support is associated with myriad health benefits, including recovery from alcohol use disorder (AUD). Understanding its neural features may aid in intervention development. However, most neuroimaging studies investigating social support do not consider potential neuroanatomical differences related to sex and AUD, even though both factors have been related to social support. This study investigated neuroanatomical correlates of perceived emotional and instrumental support as a function of sex and lifetime AUD using Human Connectome Project data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging data were collected. Gray-matter volume in brain regions associated with social support was quantified in a large sample of young adults (522 women and 432 men) who did and did not have a lifetime AUD status. Perceived emotional and instrumental support were determined via self-report scales. Relationships between gray-matter volumes and perceived emotional/instrumental support were determined for each demographic category (women/men, lifetime AUD/no-AUD) via interaction analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Gray-matter volumes in 2 brain regions (left rostral anterior cingulate cortex and left lateral orbitofrontal cortex) were inversely associated with perceived emotional support in women with lifetime AUD, such that larger gray-matter volume was associated with lower perceived emotional support. This relationship was not observed in women without lifetime AUD or men with or without lifetime AUD. No associations were observed with instrumental support.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Women differ from men in brain-behavior relationships involving perceived emotional support in a manner linked to AUD status. Sex differences warrant further investigation as social support in AUD may operate differently in women and men.</p>","PeriodicalId":14744,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Addiction Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"238-244"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144835131","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}