Journal of Addiction Medicine最新文献

Objectives: This study explores trends in buprenorphine availability at substance use disorder treatment facilities (SUDTFs) and by waivered clinicians during the pandemic. We also examined whether there were differences in access based on a county's metropolitan status and annual fatal drug poisoning rate.

Methods: Data from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration' Behavioral Health Treatment Locator between July 2019 and May 2021 were used to calculate trends in SUDTFs offering buprenorphine and the number of waivered clinicians per 10,000 population. We calculated unadjusted trends over time, stratified by whether a county was above or below the annual median age-adjusted fatal drug overdose rate in that year and the county's metropolitan status.

Results: Results showed an increase in SUDTFs and waivered clinicians offering buprenorphine before the pandemic, but the rate leveled off during the pandemic. On average, the increase in facilities was about 8 percentage points per year, and the increase in waivered clinicians was 0.29 per year. The percentage of SUDTFs offering buprenorphine peaked at 47%, and the number of waivered clinicians leveled off at 1.61 per 10,000 population.There were more SUDTFs and clinicians offering buprenorphine in metropolitan versus nonmetropolitan counties. There were also more SUDTFs and clinicians offering buprenorphine in counties above versus below median poisoning rates.

Conclusions: This study provides insights into how buprenorphine availability changed during the COVID-19 pandemic and before the removal of the X-waiver in 2023. More outreach will be needed to encourage the offering of buprenorphine by SUDTFs and office-based clinicians.

Background: Ketamine is a dissociative anesthetic increasingly utilized in United States medical settings for the treatment of mental health conditions. Additionally, it is increasingly used in nonmedical settings for its dissociative properties. While nonmedical ketamine use and ketamine use disorder (KUD) have been observed internationally, KUD, and approaches to its treatment, have not been previously described in the US.

Case presentation: We present the case of a 32-year-old man with KUD who experienced severe cravings despite receipt of residential and intensive outpatient substance use disorder treatment. He resumed use after an initial period of abstinence and was subsequently started on lamotrigine and naltrexone for treatment of depressive symptoms and cravings. This combination altered his experience while on ketamine, resulting in nausea and decreased hallucinogenic effects. In addition, it substantially decreased his cravings, aiding him in achieving longer-term abstinence in combination with receipt of dialectical behavioral therapy, familial support, and involvement in 12-step programming.

Discussion: KUD is a poorly described condition that may become more prevalent as US ketamine use increases. Combining treatment of depressive symptoms and cravings, in this case with lamotrigine and naltrexone, may be a promising pharmacotherapeutic strategy. Lamotrigine, an antiepileptic with glutamate modulating effects, has been utilized to decrease cravings in a variety of substance use disorders. Naltrexone is an opioid antagonist approved for alcohol use disorder and opioid use disorder and is used off-label for stimulant use disorder. This combination offers a possible pharmacotherapeutic option for KUD with more research needed to further evaluate.

Abstract: In recent years, there has been a marked surge in opioid overdose deaths among Black, Latino, and Native American populations. The emergency department (ED) represents a crucial opportunity to address these racial and ethnic inequities by initiating buprenorphine and providing referral for ongoing addiction treatment. Yet Black, Latino, and Native American populations encounter substantial inequities in ED-based addiction treatment access. Within this context, Koeber et al conducted their cross-sectional study of ED patients who screened positive for opioid misuse to evaluate inequities in buprenorphine administration. The authors found that Black ED patients were less likely (odds ratio, 0.56; 95% confidence interval, 0.35-0.88) to receive buprenorphine. There is an urgent need for mixed methods research to understand the drivers of these inequities and interventions to address the multilevel factors across the opioid use disorder care continuum to promote equitable, accessible, person-centered opioid use disorder treatment.

Objective: This analysis evaluated the validation results of the Tobacco, Alcohol, Prescription Medication, and Other Substance Use (TAPS) tool for older adults.

Methods: We performed a subgroup analysis of older adults aged ≥65 (n = 184) from the TAPS tool validation study conducted in 5 primary care clinics. We compared the interviewer and self-administered versions of the TAPS tool at a cutoff of ≥1 for identifying problem use with a reference standard measure, the modified World Mental Health Composite International Diagnostic Interview.

Results: The mean age was 70.6 ± 5.9 years, 52.7% were female, and 49.5% were non-Hispanic Black. For identifying problem use, the self-administered TAPS tool had sensitivity of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.75-0.98) and specificity of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.85-0.95) for tobacco; sensitivity of 0.68 (95% CI: 0.45-0.86) and specificity of 0.88 (95% CI: 0.82-0.93) for alcohol; and sensitivity 0.86 (95% CI: 0.42-1.00) and specificity 0.94 (95% CI: 0.90-0.97) for cannabis. The interviewer-administered TAPS tool had similar results. We were unable to evaluate its performance for identifying problem use of individual classes of drugs other than cannabis in this population due to small sample sizes.

Conclusions: While the TAPS had excellent sensitivity and specificity for identifying tobacco use among older adults, the results for other substances lack precision, and we were unable to evaluate its performance for prescription medications and individual illicit drugs in this sample. This analysis underlines the critical need to adapt and validate screening tools for unhealthy substance use, specifically for older populations who have unique risks.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to identify distinct trajectories of prescription opioid exposure in pregnancy-encompassing both medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) and opioid analgesics-and explore their associations with birth outcomes.

Methods: Trajectories were identified using latent class analysis among Wisconsin Medicaid-insured live births 2011-2019. Logistic regression estimated associations between these trajectories and neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS), small for gestational age, preterm birth, birth weight, and gestational age.

Results: Of 138,123 births, 27,293 (19.8%) had prenatal opioid exposure. Five trajectory classes were identified: (1) stable MOUD treatment (5.8%), (2) inconsistent MOUD treatment (3.9%), (3) chronic analgesic use (4.2%), (4) intermittent analgesic use (7.8%), and (5) low-level use of MOUD and analgesics (78.3%). NOWS incidence per 1000 infants was 667 for class 1 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 21.74, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 17.89, 26.41), 570 for class 2 (aOR: 15.35, 95% CI: 12.49, 18.87), 235 for class 3 (aOR: 19.42, 95% CI: 15.93, 23.68), 67 for class 4 (aOR: 6.23, 95% CI: 4.99, 7.76), and 12 for class 5 (aOR: 1.73, 95% CI: 1.47, 2.02). Classes 1-4 had elevated risk of small for gestational age, preterm birth, lower birth weight, and shorter gestational age, with no significant differences among these classes. Among individuals with opioid use disorder, stable MOUD treatment was associated with higher birth weights and longer gestational ages compared to inconsistent treatment, despite higher odds of NOWS.

Conclusions: Early initiation and consistent MOUD treatment may improve birth weight and gestational age. For pregnant individuals with opioid use disorder using chronic analgesics, transition to MOUD may promote birth outcomes.

Background: Alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD) is the most common indication for liver transplantation in the United States. Alcohol use disorder (AUD) treatment is recommended in all patients with ALD and AUD, but it remains underutilized.

Aims: To identify predictors of AUD treatment and to assess 30-day readmission, return to drinking, and 1-year transplant-free survival.

Methods: Retrospective single-center cohort study of consecutive patients hospitalized with ALD and AUD between 2018 and 2020. Patients who died or were lost to follow-up at 90 days after hospitalization were excluded. AUD treatment was defined as receiving medication or participating in residential, outpatient, or support groups within 90 days of discharge.

Results: One hundred nine patients were included. Mean age was 51.7 years, and 63% were male. Fifty-six (51%) patients received AUD treatment, and 23 (21%) patients received more than one treatment. Predictors of AUD treatment were younger age (OR, 1.07 [95% CI, 1.04-1.12]; P < 0.001), gastroenterology/hepatology consult (AOR, 8.54 [95% CI, 2.55-39.50]; P = 0.0002), addiction psychiatry consult (AOR, 2.77 [95% CI, 1.16-6.84]; P = 0.02), and a brief AUD intervention (AOR, 18.19 [95% CI, 3.36-339.07]; P = 0.0001). Cirrhosis decompensation, MELD-Na score, and insurance status were not associated with treatment. Thirty-one patients (28.4%) were readmitted, and 29 (26.6%) remained abstinent 30 days from discharge. Patients who received treatment had improved transplant-free survival (HR, 0.44, P = 0.04).

Conclusion: A brief intervention on AUD had the strongest association with receiving AUD treatment in our cohort. Further efforts to incorporate brief interventions when offering AUD treatment to patients with ALD may be beneficial.

Introduction: Cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome is characterized by recurrent episodes of severe nausea and vomiting, often associated with prolonged and excessive cannabis use. With the recent legalization and rising consumption of cannabidiol (CBD) in Europe and the United States, concerns have emerged about its potential role in triggering similar symptoms.

Case report: A 32-year-old male with a history of cannabis, tobacco and alcohol use disorder experienced multiple cyclic vomiting episodes after switching from cannabis to CBD. Initially, the patient presented with abdominal pain and vomiting after ceasing cannabis use, with symptoms alleviated by hot showers. Three months later, similar symptoms reappeared despite abstinence from cannabis but regular CBD consumption. Over the next 6 months, recurrent episodes of abdominal pain and vomiting persisted with daily CBD use but no cannabis consumption. Clinical data, laboratory results, and treatment responses were analyzed to investigate the connection between CBD consumption and symptom onset.

Discussion: The pathophysiology of cannabis-induced cyclic vomiting is poorly understood. Hypotheses include tetrahydrocannabinol accumulation in adipose tissue, pyrolytic conversion of CBD into tetrahydrocannabinol, and CBD's intrinsic effects, particularly its interaction with transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 receptors. Our analysis suggests that high doses of CBD may activate transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 receptors, inducing proemetic effects.

Conclusions: Although the connection between CBD and cyclic vomiting remains uncertain, it warrants further investigation. The increasing use of CBD, perceived as a safe dietary supplement, underscores the need to understand its potential health impacts better.

Objectives: As carceral settings increasingly offer medications for opioid use disorders (MOUD), community-based providers will need to navigate relationships with correctional agencies to ensure continuity of MOUD upon release. Although collaboration has been identified as critical between agencies, limited research is available that details how providers can work with jails. We describe the perspectives of MOUD providers about their experiences collaborating with jails that had recently begun to offer MOUD.

Methods: We conducted hour-long interviews with 36 MOUD providers from 18 community-based agencies. Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment (EPIS) concepts informed data collection and analysis.

Results: MOUD providers described agency-specific (inner context) factors that facilitated collaboration, including staffing (employing staff with knowledge of co-occurring conditions) and agency culture (adaptability to change, recognition of gaps in services, being judgment-free). Providers also reported external factors as facilitators, such as broad community support of MOUD services and provision of training about MOUD to jail staff. Holding regular meetings, with a dedicated contact person, helped to overcome communication problems. However, the fragmentation of in-jail treatment services, exacerbated by jails' contracting with different healthcare providers, made it difficult to coordinate re-entry and establish agency relationships. Actively and intentionally building interagency partnerships and collaborating across interagency cultural and structural differences were bridging factors that developed and sustained collaborations.

Conclusions: Our findings offer promising suggestions for establishing collaborations with carceral partners, including assessing internal agency conditions, seeking external community supports, committing to actively engaging and sustaining collaborations, and using interagency differences to develop mutually beneficial relationships.

Objective: Opioid agonist therapy (OAT) remains the first-line therapy for people with opioid use disorder. Whereas overdose rates among adolescents and young adults (AYAs) remain high, little is known about their access to OAT. Therefore, we sought to evaluate factors that shape access to OAT among AYAs aged 14 to 26 years.

Methods: Data were derived from the At-Risk Youth Study, a prospective cohort study that involves street-involved AYAs who use illicit substances in Vancouver, Canada. Generalized estimating equations were used to identify factors associated with OAT enrollment from September 2005 to October 2021.

Results: A total of 759 AYAs reported at least weekly opioid or OAT use, with a median age of 23 years and 65.7% self-identifying as male. At baseline, 147 participants (19.4%) were on OAT, and another 199 (26.2%) initiated OAT during study follow-up (median number of follow-up visits, 5 [Q1-Q3, 2.5-8]). In a multivariable analysis, being <19 years old (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.40; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.23-0.71), Indigenous ancestry (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.52-1.00), homelessness (AOR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.54-0.77), drug dealing (AOR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.61-0.87), daily opioid use (AOR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.40-0.55), and nonfatal overdose (AOR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.60-0.89) were negatively associated with OAT use.

Conclusions: This study identified a low rate of OAT access among AYAs. Adolescents and young adults were less likely to be on OAT if they were <19 years old, Indigenous, and possessed certain risk markers. These findings highlight the need for mitigation strategies to facilitate OAT access for this population and for additional harm reduction measures to support AYAs who do not want to use OAT.