JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute最新文献

Objective: Proteomics may discover pathophysiological changes related to hepatocellular carcinoma, an aggressive and lethal type of cancer with low sensitivity for early stage diagnosis.

Design: We measured 1305 prediagnostic (median = 12.7 years) SomaScan proteins from 54 pairs of healthy individuals who subsequently developed hepatocellular carcinoma and matched non-hepatocellular carcinoma control individuals from the Nurses' Health Study (NHS) and the Health Professionals Follow-up Study (HPFS). Candidate proteins were validated in the independent, prospective UK Biobank Pharma Proteomics Project (UKB-PPP).

Results: In NHS and HPFS, we identified 56 elevated proteins in hepatocellular carcinoma with an absolute fold change of more than 1.2 and a Wald test P value less than .05 in conditional logistic regression analysis. Ingenuity pathway analysis identified enrichment of pathways associated with cell viability, adhesion, proteolysis, apoptosis, and inflammatory response. Four proteins-chitinase-3-like protein 1, growth differentiation factor 15, interleukin-1 receptor antagonist protein, and E-selectin-showed strong positive associations with hepatocellular carcinoma and were thus validated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (odds ratio = 2.48-14.7, all P < .05) in the NHS and HPFS and by Olink platform (hazard ratio = 1.90-3.93, all P < .05) in the UKB-PPP. Adding these 4 proteins to a logistic regression model of traditional hepatocellular carcinoma risk factors increased the area under the curve from 0.67 to 0.87 in the NHS and HPFS. Consistently, model area under the curve was 0.88 for hepatocellular carcinoma risk prediction in the UKB-PPP.

Conclusion: However, the limited number of hepatocellular carcinoma patients in the cohorts necessitates caution in interpreting our findings, emphasizing the need for further validation in high-risk populations.

The aim of this review was to highlight why the use of master protocols trial design is particularly useful for radiotherapy intervention trials where complex setup pathways (including quality assurance, user training, and integrating multiple modalities of treatment) may hinder clinical advances. We carried out a systematic review according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, reviewing the findings using a landscape analysis. Results were summarized descriptively, reporting on trial characteristics highlighting the benefits, limitations, and challenges of developing and implementing radiotherapy master protocols, with three case studies selected to explore these issues in more detail. Twelve studies were suitable for inclusion (4 platform trials, 3 umbrella trials, and 5 basket trials), evaluating a mix of solid tumor sites in both curative and palliative settings. The interventions were categorized into 1) novel agent and radiotherapy combinations; 2) radiotherapy dose personalization; and 3) device evaluation, with a case study provided for each intervention. Benefits of master protocol trials for radiotherapy intervention include protocol efficiency for implementation of novel radiotherapy techniques; accelerating the evaluation of novel agent drug and radiotherapy combinations; and more efficient translational research opportunities, leading to cost savings and research efficiency to improve patient outcomes. Master protocols offer an innovative platform under which multiple clinical questions can be addressed within a single trial. Due to the complexity of radiotherapy trial setup, cost and research efficiency savings may be more apparent than in systemic treatment trials. Use of this research approach may be the change needed to push forward oncological innovation within radiation oncology.

Background: Patients with bilateral Wilms tumor initially receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy to shrink the tumors and increase the likelihood of successful nephron-sparing surgery. Biopsy of poorly responding tumors is often done to better understand therapy resistance. The purpose of this retrospective, single-institution study was to determine whether initial chemotherapy response is associated with tumor histology, potentially obviating the need for biopsy or change in chemotherapy.

Methods: Patients with synchronous bilateral Wilms tumors who underwent surgery at St Jude Children's Research Hospital from January 2000 to March 2022 were considered for this study. A mixed-effects logistic regression model was used to evaluate the likelihood of the tumor being stromal predominant, as predicted by tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Results: A total of 68 patients were eligible for this study. Tumors that increased in size had an odds ratio of 19.5 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.46 to 155.03) for being stromal predominant vs any other histologic subtype. Age at diagnosis was youngest in patients with stromal-predominant tumors, with a mean age of 18.8 (14.1) months compared with all other histologic subtypes (χ2 = 7.05, P = .07). The predictive value of a tumor growing combined with patient aged younger than 18 months for confirming stromal-predominant histology was 85.7% (95% CI = 57.18% to 93.5%).

Conclusions: Tumors that increased in size during neoadjuvant chemotherapy were most frequently stromal-predominant bilateral Wilms tumor, especially in younger patients. Therefore, nephron-sparing surgery, rather than biopsy, or extension or intensification of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, should be considered for bilateral Wilms tumors that increase in volume during neoadjuvant chemotherapy, particularly in patients aged younger than 18 months.

Background: Although breast cancer survivors are at risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) from treatment late effects, evidence to inform long-term and age-specific cardiovascular surveillance recommendations is lacking.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 10 211 women diagnosed with first primary unilateral breast cancer in Kaiser Permanente Washington or Colorado (aged 20 years and older, survived ≥1 year). We estimated multivariable adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for associations between initial chemotherapy regimen type (anthracycline and/or trastuzumab, other chemotherapies, no chemotherapy [referent]) and CVD risk, adjusted for patient characteristics, other treatments, and CVD risk factors. Cumulative incidence was calculated considering competing events.

Results: After 5.79 median years, 14.67% of women developed CVD (cardiomyopathy and/or heart failure [HF], ischemic heart disease, stroke). Women treated with anthracyclines and/or trastuzumab had a higher risk of CVD compared with no chemotherapy (adjusted HR = 1.53, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.31 to 1.79), persisting at least 5 years postdiagnosis (adjusted HR5-<10 years = 1.85, 95% CI = 1.44 to 2.39; adjusted HR≥10 years = 1.83, 95% CI = 1.34 to 2.49). Cardiomyopathy and/or HF risks were elevated among women treated with anthracyclines and/or trastuzumab compared with no chemotherapy, especially for those aged younger than 65 years (adjusted HR20-54years = 2.97, 95% CI = 1.72 to 5.12; adjusted HR55-64years = 2.21, 95% CI = 1.52 to 3.21), differing for older women (adjusted HR≥65 years = 1.32, 95% CI = 0.97 to 1.78), and at least 5 years postdiagnosis (adjusted HR5-<10years = 1.89, 95% CI = 1.35 to 2.64; adjusted HR≥10 years = 2.21, 95% CI = 1.52 to 3.20). Anthracyclines and/or trastuzumab receipt was associated with increased ischemic heart disease risks after 5 or more years (adjusted HR5-<10years = 1.51, 95% CI = 1.06 to 2.14; adjusted HR≥10 years = 1.86, 95% CI = 1.18 to 2.93) with no clear age effects, and stroke risk (adjusted HR = 1.33, 95% CI = 1.05 to 1.69), which did not vary by time or age. There was some evidence of long-term cardiomyopathy and/or HF and ischemic heart disease risks with other chemotherapies. Among women aged younger than 65 treated with anthracyclines and/or trastuzumab, up to 16% developed CVD by 10 years (20-54 years = 6.91%; 55-64 years = 16.00%), driven by cardiomyopathy and/or HF (20-54 years = 3.90%; 55-64 years = 9.78%).

Conclusions: We found increased long-term risks of cardiomyopathy and/or HF and ischemic heart disease among breast cancer survivors treated with anthracyclines and/or trastuzumab and increased cardiomyopathy and/or HF risk among women aged younger than 65 years.

Background: Beyond demographic and immune factors, metabolic considerations, particularly metformin's recognized impact in oncology, warrant exploration in treating pancreatic cancer. This study aimed to investigate the influence of metformin on patient survival and its potential correlation with distinct immune profiles in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) tumors.

Methods: We included 82 upfront resected and 66 gemcitabine-based neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT)-treated patients from the PREOPANC randomized controlled trial (RCT). Transcriptomic NanoString immunoprofiling was performed for a subset of 96 available resected specimens.

Results: Disparities in survival outcomes and immune profiles were apparent between metformin and non-metformin users in upfront resected patients but lacking in nCRT-treated patients. Compared to non-metformin users, upfront resected metformin users showed a higher median overall survival (OS) of 29 vs 14 months and a better 5-year OS rate of 19% vs 5%. Furthermore, metformin use was a favorable prognostic factor for OS in the upfront surgery group (HR = 0.56; 95% CI = 0.32 to 0.99). Transcriptomic data revealed that metformin users significantly underexpressed genes related to pro-tumoral immunity, including monocyte to M2 macrophage polarization and activation. Furthermore, the relative abundance of anti-inflammatory CD163+ MRC1+ M2 macrophages in non-metformin users and immune-activating CD1A+ CD1C+ dendritic cells in metformin users was heightened (P < .001).

Conclusion: This study unveils immune profile changes resulting from metformin use in upfront resected pancreatic cancer patients, possibly contributing to prolonged survival outcomes. Specifically, metformin use may decrease the abundance and activity of pro-tumoral M2 macrophages and increase the recruitment and function of tumor-resolving DCs, favoring antitumor immunity.[PREOPANC trial EudraCT: 2012-003181-40].

Background: The cut-off of < 1% positive cells to define estrogen receptor (ER) negativity by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in breast cancer (BC) is debated. We explored the tumor immune microenvironment and gene-expression profile of patients with early-stage HER2-negative ER-low (ER 1-9%) BC, comparing them to ER-negative (ER < 1%) and ER-intermediate (ER 10-50%) tumors.

Patients and methods: Among 921 patients with early-stage I-III, ER ≤ 50%, HER2-negative BCs, tumors were classified as ER-negative (n = 712), ER-low (n = 128), or ER-intermediate (n = 81). Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) were evaluated. CD8+, FOXP3+ cells, and PD-L1 status were assessed by IHC and quantified by digital pathology. We analyzed 776 BC-related genes in 116 samples. All tests were 2-sided at < 0.05 significance level.

Results: ER-low and ER-negative tumors exhibited similar median TILs, significantly higher than ER-intermediate tumors. CD8/FOXP3 ratio and PD-L1 positivity rates were comparable between ER-low and ER-negative groups. These groups showed similar enrichment in Basal-like intrinsic subtypes and comparable expression of immune-related genes. ER-low and ER-intermediate tumors showed significant transcriptomic differences. High TILs (≥30%) were associated with improved relapse-free survival (RFS) in ER-low (5-year RFS 78.6% vs 66.2%, log-rank p = .033, hazard ratio (HR) 0.37 [95% CI 0.15-0.96]) and ER-negative patients (5-year RFS 85.2% vs 69.8%, log-rank p < .001, HR 0.41 [95% CI 0.27-0.60]).

Conclusions: ER-low and ER-negative tumors are similar biological and molecular entities, supporting their comparable clinical outcomes and treatment responses, including to immunotherapy. Our findings contribute to the growing evidence calling for a reevaluation of ER-positive BC classification and management, aligning ER-low and ER-negative tumors more closely.

Research conducted over the past 15+ years has identified hundreds of common germline genetic variants associated with cancer risk but understanding the biological impact of these primarily non-protein coding variants has been challenging [1]. The National Cancer Institute sought to better understand and address those challenges by requesting input from the scientific community via a survey and a 2-day virtual meeting, which focused on discussions among participants. Here, we discuss challenges identified through the survey as important to advancing functional analysis of common cancer risk variants: 1) When is a variant truly characterized; 2) Developing and standardizing databases and computational tools; 3) Optimization and implementation of high throughput assays; 4) Use of model organisms for understanding variant function; 5) Diversity in data and assays; and 6) Creating and improving large multidisciplinary collaborations. We define these six challenges, describe how success in addressing them may look, propose potential solutions, and note issues that span all the challenges. Implementation of these ideas could help develop a framework for methodically analyzing common cancer risk variants to understand their function and make effective and efficient use of the wealth of existing genomic association data.

Background: The use of androgen biosynthesis and second-generation androgen receptor inhibitors for advanced prostate cancer is increasing. Because these therapies alter the androgen pathway, they have been associated with cardiometabolic and neurocognitive toxicities. Although their safety profiles have been assessed in clinical trials, real-world data are limited.

Methods: A 20% sample of national Medicare claims was used to perform a retrospective cohort study of Medicare beneficiaries with advanced prostate cancer treated with androgen biosynthesis (ie, abiraterone) and second-generation androgen receptor inhibitors between 2012 and 2019. Outcomes were assessed after the first fill of either class of drug for the 12-month period after starting therapy. The primary outcome was a hospital admission or emergency department visit for a cardiometabolic event. Secondary outcomes included neurocognitive events and fractures. Multivariable regression was used to assess the association between the class of drug and occurrence of an adverse event.

Results: There were 3488 (60%) men started on an androgen biosynthesis inhibitor and 2361 (40%) started on an androgen receptor inhibitor for the first time. Cardiometabolic adverse events were more common in men managed with androgen biosynthesis inhibitor (9.2% vs 7.5%, P = .027). No difference between androgen biosynthesis and androgen receptor inhibitors was observed for neurocognitive events (3.3% vs 3.4%, respectively; P = .71) or fractures (4.2% vs 3.6%, respectively; P = .26).

Conclusions: Men with advanced prostate cancer initiating an androgen biosynthesis inhibitor for the first time more commonly had cardiometabolic events than those started on androgen receptor inhibitors. Neurocognitive events and fractures did not differ by drug class.

Background: The benefits of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programs rely on completing follow-up colonoscopy when a noncolonoscopy test is abnormal and on quality of colonoscopy screening as measured by the endoscopists' adenoma detection rate. Existing data demonstrate substantially lower follow-up colonoscopy rates and adenoma detection rate for Black Americans than White Americans. However, the contributions of racial differences in follow-up colonoscopy and adenoma detection rate on CRC outcomes have not been rigorously evaluated.

Methods: We used established and validated CRC-Adenoma Incidence and Mortality (CRC-AIM) model as our analysis platform, with inputs from published literature that report lower follow-up colonoscopy rates and adenoma detection rate in Black adults compared with White adults (15% and 10% lower, respectively). We simulated screening with annual fecal immunochemical test, triennial multitarget stool DNA, and colonoscopy every 10 years between ages 45 and 75 years using real-world utilization of the screening modalities vs no screening. We reported lifetime outcomes per 1000 Black adults.

Results: Elimination of Black-White disparities in follow-up colonoscopy rates would reduce CRC incidence and mortality by 5.2% and 9.3%, respectively, and improve life-years gained with screening by 3.4%. Elimination of Black-White disparities in endoscopists' adenoma detection rate would reduce CRC incidence and mortality by 9.4% and improve life-years gained by 3.7%. Elimination of both disparities would reduce CRC incidence and mortality by 14.6% and 18.7%, respectively, and improve life-years gained by 7.1%.

Conclusions: This modeling study predicts eliminating racial differences in follow-up colonoscopy rates, and quality of screening colonoscopy would substantially reduce Black-White disparities in CRC incidence and mortality.