首页 > 最新文献

JAMA Oncology最新文献

英文 中文
Genetic Testing in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer 转移性抗性前列腺癌男性患者的基因检测
IF 28.4 1区 医学 Pub Date : 2024-05-02 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.0851
Pedro C. Barata, Jonathan Assayag, Benjamin Li, Gordon Siu, Alexander Niyazov
This cross-sectional study assesses homologous recombination repair mutation genetic testing and associated characteristics among men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).
这项横断面研究评估了同源重组修复突变基因检测和转移性抗性前列腺癌(mCRPC)男性患者的相关特征。
{"title":"Genetic Testing in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer","authors":"Pedro C. Barata, Jonathan Assayag, Benjamin Li, Gordon Siu, Alexander Niyazov","doi":"10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.0851","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.0851","url":null,"abstract":"This cross-sectional study assesses homologous recombination repair mutation genetic testing and associated characteristics among men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).","PeriodicalId":14850,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":28.4,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140820920","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Longer Interval Between First Colonoscopy With Negative Findings for Colorectal Cancer and Repeat Colonoscopy 首次结肠镜检查结果为阴性的结肠直肠癌与再次结肠镜检查之间的间隔时间更长
IF 28.4 1区 医学 Pub Date : 2024-05-02 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.0827
Qunfeng Liang, Trasias Mukama, Kristina Sundquist, Jan Sundquist, Hermann Brenner, Elham Kharazmi, Mahdi Fallah
ImportanceFor individuals without a family history of colorectal cancer (CRC), colonoscopy screening every 10 years is recommended to reduce CRC incidence and mortality. However, debate exists about whether and for how long this 10-year interval could be safely expanded.ObjectiveTo assess how many years after a first colonoscopy with findings negative for CRC a second colonoscopy can be performed.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis cohort study leveraged Swedish nationwide register-based data to examine CRC diagnoses and CRC-specific mortality among individuals without a family history of CRC. The exposed group included individuals who had a first colonoscopy with findings negative for CRC at age 45 to 69 years between 1990 and 2016. The control group included individuals matched by sex, birth year, and baseline age (ie, the age of their matched exposed individual when the exposed individual’s first colonoscopy with findings negative for CRC was performed). Individuals in the control group either did not have a colonoscopy during the follow-up or underwent colonoscopy that resulted in a CRC diagnosis. Up to 18 controls were matched with each exposed individual. Individuals were followed up from 1990 to 2018, and data were analyzed from November 2022 to November 2023.ExposureA first colonoscopy with findings negative for CRC, defined as a first colonoscopy without a diagnosis of colorectal polyp, adenoma, carcinoma in situ, or CRC before or within 6 months after screening.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcomes were CRC diagnosis and CRC-specific death. The 10-year standardized incidence ratio and standardized mortality ratio were calculated to compare risks of CRC and CRC-specific death in the exposed and control groups based on different follow-up screening intervals.ResultsThe sample included 110 074 individuals (65 147 females [59.2%]) in the exposed group and 1 981 332 (1 172 646 females [59.2%]) in the control group. The median (IQR) age for individuals in both groups was 59 (52-64) years. During up to 29 years of follow-up of individuals with a first colonoscopy with findings negative for CRC, 484 incident CRCs and 112 CRC-specific deaths occurred. After a first colonoscopy with findings negative for CRC, the risks of CRC and CRC-specific death in the exposed group were significantly lower than those in their matched controls for 15 years. At 15 years after a first colonoscopy with findings negative for CRC, the 10-year standardized incidence ratio was 0.72 (95% CI, 0.54-0.94) and the 10-year standardized mortality ratio was 0.55 (95% CI, 0.29-0.94). In other words, the 10-year cumulative risk of CRC in year 15 in the exposed group was 72% that of the 10-year cumulative risk of CRC in the control group. Extending the colonoscopy screening interval from 10 to 15 years in individuals with a first colonoscopy with findings negative for CRC could miss the early detection of only 2 CRC cases and the prevention of 1 CRC-specific death pe
重要性对于没有结直肠癌(CRC)家族史的人,建议每 10 年进行一次结肠镜筛查,以降低 CRC 发病率和死亡率。这项队列研究利用瑞典全国范围内的登记数据,对无家族史的人群中的 CRC 诊断和 CRC 特异性死亡率进行了检查。暴露组包括 1990 年至 2016 年间 45 岁至 69 岁首次接受结肠镜检查结果为阴性的 CRC 患者。对照组包括按性别、出生年份和基线年龄(即与暴露者相匹配的暴露者首次结肠镜检查结果为阴性的年龄)匹配的个体。对照组中的个体要么在随访期间没有接受过结肠镜检查,要么接受结肠镜检查后确诊为 CRC。每个暴露个体最多可匹配 18 个对照组。暴露是指在筛查前或筛查后 6 个月内首次接受结肠镜检查,结果显示 CRC 阴性,但未诊断出结直肠息肉、腺瘤、原位癌或 CRC。主要结果和测量指标主要结果是 CRC 诊断和 CRC 特异性死亡。根据不同的随访筛查时间间隔,计算暴露组和对照组的 10 年标准化发病率比和标准化死亡率比,以比较暴露组和对照组的 CRC 和 CRC 特异性死亡风险。两组人员的年龄中位数(IQR)均为 59(52-64)岁。在对首次结肠镜检查结果为阴性的患者进行长达 29 年的随访期间,共发生了 484 例结肠癌病例和 112 例结肠癌死亡病例。在首次结肠镜检查结果为阴性后的15年中,暴露组患乳腺癌和乳腺癌特异性死亡的风险明显低于匹配对照组。在首次结肠镜检查结果为阴性的 15 年后,10 年标准化发病率比为 0.72(95% CI,0.54-0.94),10 年标准化死亡率比为 0.55(95% CI,0.29-0.94)。换句话说,暴露组在第 15 年患上 CRC 的 10 年累积风险是对照组的 72%。将首次结肠镜检查结果为阴性的人群的结肠镜筛查间隔时间从 10 年延长至 15 年,每 1000 人中仅有 2 例 CRC 病例被早期发现,1 例 CRC 死亡得以避免,同时可能避免 1000 次结肠镜检查。延长结肠镜筛查间隔时间有利于避免不必要的侵入性检查。
{"title":"Longer Interval Between First Colonoscopy With Negative Findings for Colorectal Cancer and Repeat Colonoscopy","authors":"Qunfeng Liang, Trasias Mukama, Kristina Sundquist, Jan Sundquist, Hermann Brenner, Elham Kharazmi, Mahdi Fallah","doi":"10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.0827","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.0827","url":null,"abstract":"ImportanceFor individuals without a family history of colorectal cancer (CRC), colonoscopy screening every 10 years is recommended to reduce CRC incidence and mortality. However, debate exists about whether and for how long this 10-year interval could be safely expanded.ObjectiveTo assess how many years after a first colonoscopy with findings negative for CRC a second colonoscopy can be performed.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis cohort study leveraged Swedish nationwide register-based data to examine CRC diagnoses and CRC-specific mortality among individuals without a family history of CRC. The exposed group included individuals who had a first colonoscopy with findings negative for CRC at age 45 to 69 years between 1990 and 2016. The control group included individuals matched by sex, birth year, and baseline age (ie, the age of their matched exposed individual when the exposed individual’s first colonoscopy with findings negative for CRC was performed). Individuals in the control group either did not have a colonoscopy during the follow-up or underwent colonoscopy that resulted in a CRC diagnosis. Up to 18 controls were matched with each exposed individual. Individuals were followed up from 1990 to 2018, and data were analyzed from November 2022 to November 2023.ExposureA first colonoscopy with findings negative for CRC, defined as a first colonoscopy without a diagnosis of colorectal polyp, adenoma, carcinoma in situ, or CRC before or within 6 months after screening.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcomes were CRC diagnosis and CRC-specific death. The 10-year standardized incidence ratio and standardized mortality ratio were calculated to compare risks of CRC and CRC-specific death in the exposed and control groups based on different follow-up screening intervals.ResultsThe sample included 110 074 individuals (65 147 females [59.2%]) in the exposed group and 1 981 332 (1 172 646 females [59.2%]) in the control group. The median (IQR) age for individuals in both groups was 59 (52-64) years. During up to 29 years of follow-up of individuals with a first colonoscopy with findings negative for CRC, 484 incident CRCs and 112 CRC-specific deaths occurred. After a first colonoscopy with findings negative for CRC, the risks of CRC and CRC-specific death in the exposed group were significantly lower than those in their matched controls for 15 years. At 15 years after a first colonoscopy with findings negative for CRC, the 10-year standardized incidence ratio was 0.72 (95% CI, 0.54-0.94) and the 10-year standardized mortality ratio was 0.55 (95% CI, 0.29-0.94). In other words, the 10-year cumulative risk of CRC in year 15 in the exposed group was 72% that of the 10-year cumulative risk of CRC in the control group. Extending the colonoscopy screening interval from 10 to 15 years in individuals with a first colonoscopy with findings negative for CRC could miss the early detection of only 2 CRC cases and the prevention of 1 CRC-specific death pe","PeriodicalId":14850,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":28.4,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140821040","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Interpreting the Findings of the POHIM-CCRT Trial. 解读 POHIM-CCRT 试验结果。
IF 28.4 1区 医学 Pub Date : 2024-04-25 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.0048
Mark E Bernard
{"title":"Interpreting the Findings of the POHIM-CCRT Trial.","authors":"Mark E Bernard","doi":"10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.0048","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.0048","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14850,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":28.4,"publicationDate":"2024-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140654259","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Omission of Axillary Dissection Following Nodal Downstaging With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy 新辅助化疗进行结节下移后省略腋窝切除术
IF 28.4 1区 医学 Pub Date : 2024-04-25 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.0578
Giacomo Montagna, Mary M. Mrdutt, Susie X. Sun, Callie Hlavin, Emilia J. Diego, Stephanie M. Wong, Andrea V. Barrio, Astrid Botty van den Bruele, Neslihan Cabioglu, Varadan Sevilimedu, Laura H. Rosenberger, E. Shelley Hwang, Abigail Ingham, Bärbel Papassotiropoulos, Bich Doan Nguyen-Sträuli, Christian Kurzeder, Danilo Díaz Aybar, Denise Vorburger, Dieter Michael Matlac, Edvin Ostapenko, Fabian Riedel, Florian Fitzal, Francesco Meani, Franziska Fick, Jacqueline Sagasser, Jörg Heil, Hasan Karanlık, Konstantin J. Dedes, Laszlo Romics, Maggie Banys-Paluchowski, Mahmut Muslumanoglu, Maria Del Rosario Cueva Perez, Marcelo Chávez Díaz, Martin Heidinger, Mathias K. Fehr, Mattea Reinisch, Mustafa Tukenmez, Nadia Maggi, Nicola Rocco, Nina Ditsch, Oreste Davide Gentilini, Regis R. Paulinelli, Sebastián Solé Zarhi, Sherko Kuemmel, Simona Bruzas, Simona di Lascio, Tamara K. Parissenti, Tanya L. Hoskin, Uwe Güth, Valentina Ovalle, Christoph Tausch, Henry M. Kuerer, Abigail S. Caudle, Jean-Francois Boileau, Judy C. Boughey, Thorsten Kühn, Monica Morrow, Walter P. Weber
ImportanceData on oncological outcomes after omission of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in patients with breast cancer that downstages from node positive to negative with neoadjuvant chemotherapy are sparse. Additionally, the best axillary surgical staging technique in this scenario is unknown.ObjectiveTo investigate oncological outcomes after sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) with dual-tracer mapping or targeted axillary dissection (TAD), which combines SLNB with localization and retrieval of the clipped lymph node.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsIn this multicenter retrospective cohort study that was conducted at 25 centers in 11 countries, 1144 patients with consecutive stage II to III biopsy-proven node-positive breast cancer were included between April 2013 and December 2020. The cumulative incidence rates of axillary, locoregional, and any invasive (locoregional or distant) recurrence were determined by competing risk analysis.ExposureOmission of ALND after SLNB or TAD.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary end points were the 3-year and 5-year rates of any axillary recurrence. Secondary end points included locoregional recurrence, any invasive (locoregional and distant) recurrence, and the number of lymph nodes removed.ResultsA total of 1144 patients (median [IQR] age, 50 [41-59] years; 78 [6.8%] Asian, 105 [9.2%] Black, 102 [8.9%] Hispanic, and 816 [71.0%] White individuals; 666 SLNB [58.2%] and 478 TAD [41.8%]) were included. A total of 1060 patients (93%) had N1 disease, 619 (54%) had ERBB2 (formerly HER2)–positive illness, and 758 (66%) had a breast pathologic complete response. TAD patients were more likely to receive nodal radiation therapy (85% vs 78%; P = .01). The clipped node was successfully retrieved in 97% of TAD cases and 86% of SLNB cases (without localization). The mean (SD) number of sentinel lymph nodes retrieved was 3 (2) vs 4 (2) (P < .001), and the mean (SD) number of total lymph nodes removed was 3.95 (1.97) vs 4.44 (2.04) (P < .001) in the TAD and SLNB groups, respectively. The 5-year rates of any axillary, locoregional, and any invasive recurrence in the entire cohort were 1.0% (95% CI, 0.49%-2.0%), 2.7% (95% CI, 1.6%-4.1%), and 10% (95% CI, 8.3%-13%), respectively. The 3-year cumulative incidence of axillary recurrence did not differ between TAD and SLNB (0.5% vs 0.8%; P = .55).Conclusions and RelevanceThe results of this cohort study showed that axillary recurrence was rare in this setting and was not significantly lower after TAD vs SLNB. These results support omission of ALND in this population.
重要性乳腺癌患者在接受新辅助化疗后从淋巴结阳性降至阴性,但省略腋窝淋巴结清扫术(ALND)后的肿瘤治疗效果数据却很少。目的 研究前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)与双示踪剂绘图或靶向腋窝清扫(TAD)相结合后的肿瘤学结果。这项多中心回顾性队列研究在 11 个国家的 25 个中心进行,共纳入了 2013 年 4 月至 2020 年 12 月间连续 II 期至 III 期经活检证实为结节阳性的乳腺癌患者 1144 例。通过竞争风险分析确定了腋窝、局部和任何浸润性(局部或远处)复发的累积发生率。主要结果和测量主要终点是任何腋窝复发的3年和5年发生率。结果共纳入 1144 例患者(中位数[IQR]年龄 50 [41-59] 岁;78 [6.8%] 亚裔、105 [9.2%] 黑裔、102 [8.9%] 西班牙裔和 816 [71.0%] 白人;666 例 SLNB [58.2%] 和 478 例 TAD [41.8%])。共有 1060 名患者(93%)患有 N1 疾病,619 名患者(54%)ERBB2(原 HER2)阳性,758 名患者(66%)获得了乳腺病理完全反应。TAD患者更有可能接受结节放疗(85% vs 78%; P = .01)。97% 的 TAD 病例和 86% 的 SLNB 病例(未定位)成功取回了剪切的结节。TAD组和SLNB组取回的前哨淋巴结平均(标清)数分别为3(2)对4(2)(P< .001),切除的总淋巴结平均(标清)数分别为3.95(1.97)对4.44(2.04)(P< .001)。整个队列中任何腋窝、局部和任何浸润性复发的 5 年率分别为 1.0% (95% CI, 0.49%-2.0%), 2.7% (95% CI, 1.6%-4.1%) 和 10% (95% CI, 8.3%-13%) 。TAD和SLNB的3年腋窝复发累积发生率没有差异(0.5% vs 0.8%;P = .55)。结论和相关性这项队列研究的结果表明,在这种情况下腋窝复发很少见,而且TAD和SLNB术后腋窝复发率没有显著降低。这些结果支持在这一人群中省略 ALND。
{"title":"Omission of Axillary Dissection Following Nodal Downstaging With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy","authors":"Giacomo Montagna, Mary M. Mrdutt, Susie X. Sun, Callie Hlavin, Emilia J. Diego, Stephanie M. Wong, Andrea V. Barrio, Astrid Botty van den Bruele, Neslihan Cabioglu, Varadan Sevilimedu, Laura H. Rosenberger, E. Shelley Hwang, Abigail Ingham, Bärbel Papassotiropoulos, Bich Doan Nguyen-Sträuli, Christian Kurzeder, Danilo Díaz Aybar, Denise Vorburger, Dieter Michael Matlac, Edvin Ostapenko, Fabian Riedel, Florian Fitzal, Francesco Meani, Franziska Fick, Jacqueline Sagasser, Jörg Heil, Hasan Karanlık, Konstantin J. Dedes, Laszlo Romics, Maggie Banys-Paluchowski, Mahmut Muslumanoglu, Maria Del Rosario Cueva Perez, Marcelo Chávez Díaz, Martin Heidinger, Mathias K. Fehr, Mattea Reinisch, Mustafa Tukenmez, Nadia Maggi, Nicola Rocco, Nina Ditsch, Oreste Davide Gentilini, Regis R. Paulinelli, Sebastián Solé Zarhi, Sherko Kuemmel, Simona Bruzas, Simona di Lascio, Tamara K. Parissenti, Tanya L. Hoskin, Uwe Güth, Valentina Ovalle, Christoph Tausch, Henry M. Kuerer, Abigail S. Caudle, Jean-Francois Boileau, Judy C. Boughey, Thorsten Kühn, Monica Morrow, Walter P. Weber","doi":"10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.0578","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.0578","url":null,"abstract":"ImportanceData on oncological outcomes after omission of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in patients with breast cancer that downstages from node positive to negative with neoadjuvant chemotherapy are sparse. Additionally, the best axillary surgical staging technique in this scenario is unknown.ObjectiveTo investigate oncological outcomes after sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) with dual-tracer mapping or targeted axillary dissection (TAD), which combines SLNB with localization and retrieval of the clipped lymph node.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsIn this multicenter retrospective cohort study that was conducted at 25 centers in 11 countries, 1144 patients with consecutive stage II to III biopsy-proven node-positive breast cancer were included between April 2013 and December 2020. The cumulative incidence rates of axillary, locoregional, and any invasive (locoregional or distant) recurrence were determined by competing risk analysis.ExposureOmission of ALND after SLNB or TAD.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary end points were the 3-year and 5-year rates of any axillary recurrence. Secondary end points included locoregional recurrence, any invasive (locoregional and distant) recurrence, and the number of lymph nodes removed.ResultsA total of 1144 patients (median [IQR] age, 50 [41-59] years; 78 [6.8%] Asian, 105 [9.2%] Black, 102 [8.9%] Hispanic, and 816 [71.0%] White individuals; 666 SLNB [58.2%] and 478 TAD [41.8%]) were included. A total of 1060 patients (93%) had N1 disease, 619 (54%) had <jats:italic>ERBB2</jats:italic> (formerly <jats:italic>HER2</jats:italic>)–positive illness, and 758 (66%) had a breast pathologic complete response. TAD patients were more likely to receive nodal radiation therapy (85% vs 78%; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = .01). The clipped node was successfully retrieved in 97% of TAD cases and 86% of SLNB cases (without localization). The mean (SD) number of sentinel lymph nodes retrieved was 3 (2) vs 4 (2) (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &amp;amp;lt; .001), and the mean (SD) number of total lymph nodes removed was 3.95 (1.97) vs 4.44 (2.04) (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &amp;amp;lt; .001) in the TAD and SLNB groups, respectively. The 5-year rates of any axillary, locoregional, and any invasive recurrence in the entire cohort were 1.0% (95% CI, 0.49%-2.0%), 2.7% (95% CI, 1.6%-4.1%), and 10% (95% CI, 8.3%-13%), respectively. The 3-year cumulative incidence of axillary recurrence did not differ between TAD and SLNB (0.5% vs 0.8%; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = .55).Conclusions and RelevanceThe results of this cohort study showed that axillary recurrence was rare in this setting and was not significantly lower after TAD vs SLNB. These results support omission of ALND in this population.","PeriodicalId":14850,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":28.4,"publicationDate":"2024-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140648973","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Lessons in Truth-Telling From the Novels of Thomas Wolfe. 从托马斯-沃尔夫的小说中吸取讲真话的教训
IF 28.4 1区 医学 Pub Date : 2024-04-25 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.0597
Barry Meisenberg
This essay describes the author’s experience with learning about building trust with every patient and family interaction through literature.
这篇文章描述了作者通过文学作品学习如何与每一位患者和家属建立信任的经历。
{"title":"Lessons in Truth-Telling From the Novels of Thomas Wolfe.","authors":"Barry Meisenberg","doi":"10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.0597","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.0597","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 This essay describes the author’s experience with learning about building trust with every patient and family interaction through literature.\u0000","PeriodicalId":14850,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":28.4,"publicationDate":"2024-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140656193","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Clarification Regarding Breast Cancer Stage in France-Reply. 关于法国乳腺癌分期的说明--回复。
IF 28.4 1区 医学 Pub Date : 2024-04-25 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.0671
J. D. Benítez Fuentes, Eileen Morgan, Isabelle Soerjomataram
{"title":"Clarification Regarding Breast Cancer Stage in France-Reply.","authors":"J. D. Benítez Fuentes, Eileen Morgan, Isabelle Soerjomataram","doi":"10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.0671","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.0671","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14850,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":28.4,"publicationDate":"2024-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140653429","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Postoperative Hypofractionated Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy With Concurrent Chemotherapy in Cervical Cancer 宫颈癌术后低分次调强放疗与同期化疗
IF 28.4 1区 医学 Pub Date : 2024-04-25 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.0565
Won Kyung Cho, Won Park, Sang-Won Kim, Kang Kyu Lee, Ki Jung Ahn, Jin Hwa Choi
ImportanceProspective data assessing the safety of hypofractionated (40 Gy in 16 fractions) radiotherapy (RT) among patients who receive postoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer are lacking.ObjectiveTo evaluate the acute toxic effects of hypofractionated pelvic intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with concurrent chemotherapy among women with cervical cancer who underwent radical hysterectomy.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThe POHIM-CCRT (Postoperative Hypofractionated Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy With Concurrent Chemotherapy in Cervical Cancer) study was designed as a multicenter, phase 2 nonrandomized controlled trial that accrued and followed up patients from June 1, 2017, to February 28, 2023. In total, 84 patients were enrolled from 5 institutions affiliated with the Korean Radiation Oncology Group. Eligible patients experienced lymph node metastasis, parametrial invasion, or positive resection margins after radical hysterectomy for treatment of confirmed cervical cancer.InterventionPostoperative pelvic radiation using hypofractionated IMRT with 40 Gy in 16 fractions to the whole pelvis combined with concurrent chemotherapy.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary end point was incidence of acute grade 3 or higher gastrointestinal tract, genitourinary, and hematologic toxic effects (based on the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0) in the evaluable population during RT or within 3 months after RT completion.ResultsOf 84 patients enrolled, 5 dropped out prior to RT, and data from 79 patients were analyzed. The patients’ median (IQR) age was 48 (42-58) years, and the median (IQR) tumor size was 3.7 (2.7-4.5) cm. Of these patients, 31 (39.7%) had lymph node metastasis, 4 (5.1%) had positive resection margins, and 43 (54.4%) had parametrial invasion. Grade 3 or higher acute toxic effects occurred in 2 patients (2.5% [90% CI, 0%-4.8%]). After a median (IQR) follow-up of 43.0 (21.1-59.0) months, the 3-year disease-free survival rate was 79.3%, and the overall survival rate was 98.0%.ConclusionsFindings from this nonrandomized control trial indicated that postoperative pelvic irradiation combined with concurrent chemotherapy using hypofractionated IMRT with 40 Gy in 16 fractions was safe and well-tolerated in women with cervical cancer. Studies assessing long-term toxic effects and oncological outcomes with longer follow-up periods are needed.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03239613
重要性目前尚缺乏前瞻性数据来评估宫颈癌术后同期化疗患者接受低分次(40 Gy,16 次分割)放疗(RT)的安全性。目的评估接受根治性子宫切除术的宫颈癌女性患者接受低分次盆腔调强放疗(IMRT)与同期化疗的急性毒性反应。设计、设置和参与者POHIM-CCRT(宫颈癌术后低分次调强放疗与同期化疗)研究设计为一项多中心、2期非随机对照试验,从2017年6月1日至2023年2月28日招募并随访患者。韩国放射肿瘤学组下属的 5 家机构共招募了 84 名患者。符合条件的患者在接受根治性子宫切除术治疗确诊宫颈癌后出现淋巴结转移、宫旁侵犯或切除边缘阳性。干预术后盆腔放疗采用低分次IMRT,40 Gy分16次照射整个盆腔,并同时进行化疗。主要结果和测量指标主要终点是可评估人群在RT期间或RT结束后3个月内急性3级或以上胃肠道、泌尿生殖系统和血液系统毒性反应的发生率(根据美国国立癌症研究所不良事件通用术语标准4.0版)。患者的中位(IQR)年龄为 48(42-58)岁,中位(IQR)肿瘤大小为 3.7(2.7-4.5)厘米。在这些患者中,31 例(39.7%)有淋巴结转移,4 例(5.1%)切除边缘阳性,43 例(54.4%)有宫旁侵犯。2名患者(2.5% [90% CI, 0%-4.8%])出现了3级或以上急性毒性反应。结论这项非随机对照试验的结果表明,在宫颈癌女性患者中,术后盆腔照射结合同期化疗使用低分次 IMRT,40 Gy 分 16 次照射是安全且耐受性良好的。需要进行更长时间的随访,以评估长期毒性效应和肿瘤结果:NCT03239613
{"title":"Postoperative Hypofractionated Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy With Concurrent Chemotherapy in Cervical Cancer","authors":"Won Kyung Cho, Won Park, Sang-Won Kim, Kang Kyu Lee, Ki Jung Ahn, Jin Hwa Choi","doi":"10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.0565","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.0565","url":null,"abstract":"ImportanceProspective data assessing the safety of hypofractionated (40 Gy in 16 fractions) radiotherapy (RT) among patients who receive postoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer are lacking.ObjectiveTo evaluate the acute toxic effects of hypofractionated pelvic intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with concurrent chemotherapy among women with cervical cancer who underwent radical hysterectomy.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThe POHIM-CCRT (Postoperative Hypofractionated Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy With Concurrent Chemotherapy in Cervical Cancer) study was designed as a multicenter, phase 2 nonrandomized controlled trial that accrued and followed up patients from June 1, 2017, to February 28, 2023. In total, 84 patients were enrolled from 5 institutions affiliated with the Korean Radiation Oncology Group. Eligible patients experienced lymph node metastasis, parametrial invasion, or positive resection margins after radical hysterectomy for treatment of confirmed cervical cancer.InterventionPostoperative pelvic radiation using hypofractionated IMRT with 40 Gy in 16 fractions to the whole pelvis combined with concurrent chemotherapy.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary end point was incidence of acute grade 3 or higher gastrointestinal tract, genitourinary, and hematologic toxic effects (based on the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0) in the evaluable population during RT or within 3 months after RT completion.ResultsOf 84 patients enrolled, 5 dropped out prior to RT, and data from 79 patients were analyzed. The patients’ median (IQR) age was 48 (42-58) years, and the median (IQR) tumor size was 3.7 (2.7-4.5) cm. Of these patients, 31 (39.7%) had lymph node metastasis, 4 (5.1%) had positive resection margins, and 43 (54.4%) had parametrial invasion. Grade 3 or higher acute toxic effects occurred in 2 patients (2.5% [90% CI, 0%-4.8%]). After a median (IQR) follow-up of 43.0 (21.1-59.0) months, the 3-year disease-free survival rate was 79.3%, and the overall survival rate was 98.0%.ConclusionsFindings from this nonrandomized control trial indicated that postoperative pelvic irradiation combined with concurrent chemotherapy using hypofractionated IMRT with 40 Gy in 16 fractions was safe and well-tolerated in women with cervical cancer. Studies assessing long-term toxic effects and oncological outcomes with longer follow-up periods are needed.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: <jats:ext-link xmlns:xlink=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\" ext-link-type=\"uri\" xlink:href=\"https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03239613\">NCT03239613</jats:ext-link>","PeriodicalId":14850,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":28.4,"publicationDate":"2024-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140649095","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Gefitinib vs Gefitinib Plus Pemetrexed and Carboplatin Chemotherapy in EGFR-Variant Lung Cancer—Long-Term Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial 吉非替尼与吉非替尼加培美曲塞和卡铂化疗治疗表皮生长因子受体变异型肺癌--随机临床试验的长期结果
IF 28.4 1区 医学 Pub Date : 2024-04-25 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.0584
Vanita Noronha, Vijay Patil, Nandini Menon, Minit Shah, Anuradha Chougule, Zoya Peelay, Kumar Prabhash
This randomized clinical trial examines whether adding chemotherapy with pemetrexed and carboplatin to gefitinib improves survival among patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)–variant non–small cell lung cancer.
这项随机临床试验探讨了在吉非替尼基础上加用培美曲塞和卡铂化疗是否能提高表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)变异型非小细胞肺癌患者的生存率。
{"title":"Gefitinib vs Gefitinib Plus Pemetrexed and Carboplatin Chemotherapy in EGFR-Variant Lung Cancer—Long-Term Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial","authors":"Vanita Noronha, Vijay Patil, Nandini Menon, Minit Shah, Anuradha Chougule, Zoya Peelay, Kumar Prabhash","doi":"10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.0584","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.0584","url":null,"abstract":"This randomized clinical trial examines whether adding chemotherapy with pemetrexed and carboplatin to gefitinib improves survival among patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (<jats:italic>EGFR</jats:italic>)–variant non–small cell lung cancer.","PeriodicalId":14850,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":28.4,"publicationDate":"2024-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140649107","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Clarification Regarding Breast Cancer Stage in France. 关于法国乳腺癌分期的说明。
IF 28.4 1区 医学 Pub Date : 2024-04-25 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.0668
Florence Molinié, Lionel Lafay, Agnès Rogel
{"title":"Clarification Regarding Breast Cancer Stage in France.","authors":"Florence Molinié, Lionel Lafay, Agnès Rogel","doi":"10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.0668","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.0668","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14850,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":28.4,"publicationDate":"2024-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140655406","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Allogeneic CD19/CD22 CAR T-Cell Therapy for B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia 异体 CD19/CD22 CAR T 细胞疗法治疗 B 细胞急性淋巴细胞白血病
IF 28.4 1区 医学 Pub Date : 2024-04-18 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.0473
Laurent Phely, Luca Hensen, Christoph Faul, Christer Alexander Ruff, Dina Schneider, Wolfgang Andreas Bethge, Claudia Lengerke
This case series reports durable remissions in 2 patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated with allogeneic bispecific CD19/CD22-targeting chimeric antigen receptor T cells.
本系列病例报告了两名接受异体双特异性 CD19/CD22 靶向嵌合抗原受体 T 细胞治疗的复发/难治性 B 细胞急性淋巴细胞白血病患者的持久缓解情况。
{"title":"Allogeneic CD19/CD22 CAR T-Cell Therapy for B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia","authors":"Laurent Phely, Luca Hensen, Christoph Faul, Christer Alexander Ruff, Dina Schneider, Wolfgang Andreas Bethge, Claudia Lengerke","doi":"10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.0473","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.0473","url":null,"abstract":"This case series reports durable remissions in 2 patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated with allogeneic bispecific CD19/CD22-targeting chimeric antigen receptor T cells.","PeriodicalId":14850,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":28.4,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140620204","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
JAMA Oncology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1