Two air quality monitoring devices (Bluesky, PurpleAir) equipped with low-cost sensors were investigated as particle monitoring devices and for personal exposure assessment and dose characterization. Raw sensor concentrations were corrected based on concentrations measured by reference instruments and for relative humidity levels. The dose received in the human respiratory tract was quantified through dosimetry simulations assuming exposure to the ambient environment. The corrected sensor concentrations exhibited a substantial improvement during wintertime which suggested better performance of the devices when the environment was significantly enriched with fine particles (heating emissions). Bluesky followed successfully PM10 trends when different sources were investigated (Sahara, heating, marine, mixed conditions) but high bias (22.1 μg/m3) during Sahara implied its inability to measure accurately PM10 concentrations. i.e. coarser particles. On the contrary, PurpleAir preserved proportional relationship during heating (r = 0.96) but failed to catch PM2.5 variations during Sahara (r = −0.55) and mixed urban conditions (r = −0.40). Comparison of sensor and referenced daily deposited doses was non-negligible with absolute errors ranging between 16.8 and 133.1 μg for Bluesky and between 17.4 and 36.7 μg for PurpleAir, yet reduced errors were obtained during wintertime as a direct result of better sensor response. Environmental conditions investigation demonstrated the inability of both sensors to be used for dose characterization during Sahara events but reduced or even minimized bias was found in the other conditions. This study emphasizes that successful personal exposure assessment by low-cost sensors should rely on accurate particle mass measurements to provide equivalent to reference deposited doses under the varying exposure conditions.
扫码关注我们
求助内容:
应助结果提醒方式:
