Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy最新文献

Objectives: Clofazimine is a promising drug for the treatment of nontuberculous mycobacterial (NTM) diseases. Accumulation of clofazimine to reach steady-state plasma concentrations takes months. A loading dose may reduce the time to steady-state-like concentrations. We evaluated the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety and tolerability of a loading dose regimen in patients with NTM disease.

Methods: Adult participants received a 4-week loading dose regimen of 300 mg clofazimine once daily, followed by a maintenance dose of 100 mg once daily (combined with other antimycobacterial drugs). Blood samples for PK analysis were collected on three occasions. A population PK model for clofazimine was developed and simulations were performed to assess the time to reach steady-state-like (target) concentrations for different dosing regimens.

Results: Twelve participants were included. The geometric mean peak and trough clofazimine concentrations after the 4-week loading phase were 0.87 and 0.50 mg/L, respectively. Adverse events were common, but mostly mild and none led to discontinuation of clofazimine. Our loading dose regimen reduced the predicted median time to target concentrations by 1.5 months compared to no loading dose (3.8 versus 5.3 months). Further time benefit was predicted with a 6-week loading dose regimen (1.4 versus 5.3 months).

Conclusion: A 4-week loading dose regimen of 300 mg once daily reduced the time to target clofazimine concentrations and was safe and well-tolerated. Extending the loading phase to 6 weeks could further decrease the time to target concentrations. Using a loading dose of clofazimine is a feasible strategy to optimize treatment of NTM disease.

Clinical trials registration: NCT05294146.

Objectives: To review the evidence on healthcare professionals' (HCPs) and patients' views of the use of point-of-care tests (POCTs) in the management of acute respiratory tract infections (RTIs) in primary care settings.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review of studies up to 28 April 2023. We included studies that included qualitative methods and results; focused on HCPs' and/or patients' views/experiences of POCTs for acute RTIs; and were conducted in primary care settings. We conducted a thematic synthesis to identify how their views on POCTs and interventions can support test use (PROSPERO registration: CRD42019150347).

Results: We included 33 studies, developing 9 categories each for HCP and patient data. We identified 38 factors affecting POCT use: 28 from HCPs and 10 from patients. Factors exist outside and within consultations, and post-consultations, illustrating that some cannot be addressed by HCPs alone. Fourteen interventions were identified that could address factors and support POCT use, with 7 interventions appearing to address the most factors. Some interventions were beyond the scope of HCPs and patients and needed to be addressed at system and organizational levels. Both groups had mixed views on the use of POCTs and highlighted implementation challenges.

Discussion: This review highlights numerous factors affecting POCT use in primary care. Policy-makers planning to implement POCTs are likely to achieve more by providing multi-faceted interventions that target factors outside, within, and post-consultation. Some interventions may need to be already established before POCT introduction. Whilst evidence beyond general practice is limited, similar factors suggest that similar context-tailored interventions would be appropriate.

Background: The rise in carbapenem-resistant bacteria and the limited number of effective antibiotics pose a major health-care threat. The combination of ceftazidime (CAZ) and avibactam (AVI) represents an approved treatment option for carbapenem-resistant intra-abdominal infections. However, data on the pharmacokinetic profile of AVI in the hepatobiliary compartment is lacking.

Objectives: To provide clinical in vivo data on the concentration of AVI in bile fluid as a surrogate for hepatobiliary excretion.

Methods: A single dose of 2000/500 mg CAZ/AVI was administered prolonged over 2 h to 10 patients prior to abdominal surgery, with bile samples available in nine patients in this phase IIb study (DRKS-ID: DRKS00023533). Antibiotic concentrations in plasma (0-8 h), bile (after resection) and pharmacodynamic parameters were determined.

Results: The mean concentration across individuals in bile was 33.5 mg/L (±20.5 mg/L) for CAZ and 7.1 mg/L (±3.5 mg/L) for AVI, resulting in bile/plasma ratios of 0.58 (±0.26) and 0.61 (±0.18). The Cmax in plasma was 87.2 mg/L (±25.0 mg/L) for CAZ and 18.6 mg/L (±6.29 mg/L) for AVI, with AUC0-∞ values of 351 h·mg/L (±104 h·mg/L) and 72.1 h·mg/L (±32.1 h·mg/L), respectively. Plasma concentrations of both CAZ and AVI remained more than 50% of the dosing interval above the minimum inhibitory concentrations (T>MIC > 50%; MICCAZ = 8 mg/L, MICAVI = 1 mg/L) in all patients. No antibiotic-associated side effects were reported during the 30-day follow-up.

Conclusions: The concentrations of CAZ and AVI in bile suggest their potential as a valuable therapeutic option for multi-resistant biliary infections.

Background: Cefiderocol may potentially be used to treat skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs). However, the pharmacokinetics of cefiderocol in human soft tissues have not yet been determined. The objective of the present PK study was to investigate whether target-site concentrations of cefiderocol are sufficiently high for the treatment of SSTIs.

Methods: In this pharmacokinetic study, a single intravenous dose of 2 g cefiderocol was administered to eight healthy male volunteers. Drug concentrations were determined in plasma, muscle and subcutis over 8 h. Free plasma concentrations were calculated using the plasma protein binding determined with ultrafiltration. Free tissue concentrations were obtained using microdialysis. Penetration ratios were calculated as AUC0-8h_free_tissue/AUC0-8h_free_plasma. A population pharmacokinetic model was developed, and the probability of target attainment (PTA) was determined using Monte Carlo simulations.

Results: Cefiderocol showed good tissue penetration, with mean penetration ratios ± standard deviation of 0.99 ± 0.33 and 0.92 ± 0.30 for subcutis and muscle, respectively. Cefiderocol pharmacokinetics in plasma were best described with a two-compartment model, and tissue concentrations were described by scaling the tissue concentrations to concentrations in the peripheral compartment of the plasma model. For a thrice-daily regimen with 2 g doses intravenously infused over 3 h, PTA was ≥90% for MIC values up to 4 mg/L, both based on free plasma and soft tissue pharmacokinetics.

Conclusions: This study indicates that a dose of 2 g cefiderocol achieves concentrations in plasma considered sufficient for treating relevant bacterial species. Assuming a comparable PK/PD target for soft tissues, sufficiently high concentrations would also be achieved in soft tissues.

Background: The effectiveness of the early treatment for antiviral agents in SARS-CoV-2 infection is closely related to patient comorbidities. Data on effectiveness in immunocompromised patients are limited, with reports involving highly heterogeneous and not well-defined populations. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of treatment in reducing hospitalizations in a real-world cohort of severely immunocompromised COVID-19 outpatients.

Patients and methods: We conducted a multicentre, retrospective, observational cohort study of immunocompromised outpatients attended in infectious diseases departments from 1 January to 31 December 2022. Propensity score matching (PSM) multivariable logistic regression models were used to estimate the adjusted odds ratio [(aOR, 95% confidence interval (CI)] for the association between antiviral prescription and outcome (COVID-19-related hospitalization up to Day 90).

Results: We identified 746 immunocompromised outpatients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. After eligibility criteria and PSM, a total of 410 patients were analysed: 205 receiving treatment (remdesivir, sotrovimab or nirmatrelvir/ritonavir) and 205 matched controls. Fifty-two patients required at least one COVID-19-related hospitalization 8 (3.9%) versus 44 (21.5%) in the antiviral and matched control cohorts, respectively. There were 13 deaths at 90 days, of which only 4 were COVID-19-related and none in the antiviral treatment group. After adjustment for residual confounders, the use of early therapy was associated with a protective effect on the risk of hospitalization [aOR 0.13 (0.05-0.29)], as was the use of biological immunomodulators [aOR 0.27 (0.10-0.74)], whereas chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [aOR 4.65 (1.09-19.69)] and anti-CD20 use [aOR 2.76 (1.31-5.81)] increased the odds.

Conclusions: Early antiviral treatment was associated with a reduced risk of COVID-19-related hospitalization in ambulatory severely immunocompromised COVID-19 patients.

Objectives: To assess the impact of mutations in the two-component sensor envZ on antibiotic resistance and virulence in the evolutionary dynamics of MDR Salmonella enteritidis (S. enteritidis).

Methods: Five S. enteritidis isolates obtained from a patient with multisite invasive infections were analysed. Analysis of antibiotic resistance genes, virulence genes and SNP was performed through WGS. RNA sequencing, quantitative RT-PCR, virulence testing in a Galleria mellonella (G. mellonella) infection model and in vitro cell experiments were used to examine the effects of envZ mutations.

Results: WGS revealed identical resistance and virulence genes on an IncFIB(S)/IncFII(S)/IncX1 fusion plasmid in all strains. The faecal strains harboured envZ mutations, reducing outer membrane protein ompD and ompF transcriptional level. Virulence testing demonstrated elevated virulence in envZ mutant strains. In vitro experiments revealed increased adhesion, invasion and phagocytosis resistance in envZ mutants, along with reduced biofilm formation and growth rates.

Conclusions: These findings highlight novel genetic locations on envZ influencing antibiotic resistance and virulence in clinical S. enteritidis strains. envZ mutations impact antibiotic resistance by down-regulating ompD and ompF expression and enhance virulence, contributing to multisite infections with increased fitness costs.

Objectives: Biofilm is the major challenge in chronic wound management. Instilling a wound cleansing solution aids in wound bed cleaning and infectious pathogen elimination. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) improves the wound-healing process. This study investigated the efficacy of two antimicrobials (Vashe Wound Cleanser and Prontosan Wound Irrigation Solution) against a multispecies bacterial biofilm with or without NPWT in an in vitro wound model.

Methods: A mixed multispecies biofilm containing Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Streptococcus pyogenes, and Acinetobacter baumannii was developed and verified by scanning electron microscopy and fluorescent in situ hybridization. The efficacy of Vashe and Prontosan against multispecies biofilm with or without NPWT was evaluated by colony-forming unit (cfu) of each species and total bacterial number, and visually confirmed by live/dead stain and confocal microscopy.

Results: Prontosan reduced biofilm cell numbers significantly: 6 instils over 24 h resulting in 3.86 ± 0.14 cfu log10 reduction without NPWT and 4.75 ± 0.13 cfu log10 reduction combined with NPWT (P < 0.01) and 12 instils over 48 h resulting in 5.24 ± 0.11 cfu log10 reduction without NPWT and biofilm eradication with NPWT (P < 0.001). NPWT alone or combined with Vashe failed to reduce multispecies biofilm numbers significantly over 24 or 48 h.

Conclusions: Prontosan significantly reduced biofilm cell numbers, with better efficacy over 48 than 24 h, emphasizing the necessity for persistent and robust treatment. NPWT enhanced the effectiveness of Prontosan instillation. However, NPWT alone or combined with Vashe showed limited efficacy and difficulty when combating the multispecies biofilm in vitro.

Objectives: Klebsiella pneumoniae is a significant pathogen with increasing resistance and high mortality rates. Conventional antibiotic susceptibility testing methods are time-consuming. Next-generation sequencing has shown promise for predicting antimicrobial resistance (AMR). This study aims to develop prediction models using whole-genome sequencing data and assess their feasibility with metagenomic next-generation sequencing data from clinical samples.

Methods: On the basis of 4170 K. pneumoniae genomes, the main genetic characteristics associated with AMR were identified using a LASSO regression model. Consequently, the prediction model was established, validated and optimized using clinical isolate read simulation sequences. To evaluate the efficacy of the model, clinical specimens were collected.

Results: Four predictive models for amikacin, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and piperacillin/tazobactam, initially had positive predictive values (PPVs) of 92%, 98%, 99%, 94%, respectively, when they were originally constructed. When applied to clinical specimens, their PPVs were 96%, 96%, 95%, and 100%, respectively. Meanwhile, there were negative predictive values (NPVs) of 100% for ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin, and 'not applicable' (NA) for amikacin and piperacillin/tazobactam. Our method achieved antibacterial phenotype classification accuracy rates of 95.92% for amikacin, 96.15% for ciprofloxacin, 95.31% for levofloxacin and 100% for piperacillin/tazobactam. The sequence-based prediction antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) reported results in an average time of 19.5 h, compared with the 67.9 h needed for culture-based AST, resulting in a significant reduction of 48.4 h.

Conclusions: These preliminary results demonstrated that the performance of prediction model for a clinically significant antimicrobial-species pair was comparable to that of phenotypic methods, thereby encouraging the expansion of sequence-based susceptibility prediction and its clinical validation and application.