Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy最新文献

Objectives: To investigate the epidemic patterns of pretreatment drug resistance (PDR) and acquired drug resistance (ADR) in HIV-1 sequences from China.

Methods: HIV-1 pol sequences and associated epidemiological data were collected from the Los Alamos HIV Sequence Database, NCBI, HIV Gene Sequence Database and PubMed. Genotypic resistance and subtypes were identified using the Stanford HIV Drug Resistance Database.

Results: A total of 36 263 sequences from ART-naïve individuals and 1548 sequences from ART-experienced individuals with virological failure were evaluated. PDR prevalence was 6.64%, initially decreasing and then increasing to 7.84% (2018-22) due to NNRTI. Pooled ADR prevalence (44.96%) increased, with NNRTI and NRTI aligning with the overall trend. The percentage of multidrug resistance was more than that of single-drug resistance in PDR and especially ADR annually. PDR was most prevalent in Central China followed by Southwest and North. ADR prevalence was highest in North China followed by Northwest and Southwest. In ADR sequences, high-level resistance was more common, especially in NRTI. PDR sequences exhibited low-level or intermediate resistance, especially PI. Drug resistance mutations revealed distinct patterns in PDR and ADR. CRF01_AE, the predominant subtype in China, exhibited the highest proportions among most ART drugs and drug resistance mutations, with a few exceptions where CRF07_BC (prominent in the Northwest), CRF55_01B and CRF08_BC (prominent in the Southwest) showed the highest proportions.

Conclusions: HIV-1 PDR and ADR prevalence in China exhibited diverse epidemiological characteristics, underscoring the importance of ongoing national monitoring of PDR, ADR and subtype; patient education on adherence; and personalized regimens.

The similarity of current definitions of 'cross-resistance' and 'co-resistance' continues to cause confusion both in the scientific community as well as in understanding policies and in particular when looking at resistance from a risk assessment perspective. Further, lack of harmonized definitions of these terms in the regulatory space is challenging for interpretation. The purpose of this article is to: (i) provide an overview of the ambiguity in existing terminology related to cross-resistance, co-resistance and co-selection; (ii) emphasize the challenges created by the use of poor terminology in research and scientific literature; and (iii) propose a clear set of harmonized definitions that could be put into use through international regulatory agencies and institutions, such as the World Health Organization, Food and Drug Administration, European Medicines Agency, Center for Disease Control, Committee for Veterinary Medicinal Products, World Organization for Animal Health/Office International des Epizooties and the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

Background: New and shorter regimens against multi-drug resistant tuberculosis (TB) remain urgently needed. To inform treatment duration in clinical trials, this study aimed to identify human pharmacokinetic equivalent doses, antimycobacterial and sterilizing activity of a novel regimen, containing bedaquiline, delamanid, moxifloxacin and sutezolid (BDMU), in the standard mouse model (BALB/c) of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) infection.

Methods: Treatment of mice with B25D0.6M200U200, B25D0.6M200, B25D0.6M200(U2003) or H10R10Z150E100 (isoniazid, rifampicin, pyrazinamide, ethambutol, HRZE), started 3 weeks after Mtb infection. Bactericidal activity was assessed after 1, 2, 3 and 4 months of treatment and relapse rates were assessed 3 months after completing treatment durations of 2, 3 and 4 months.

Results: B25D0.6M200U200 generated human equivalent exposures in uninfected BALB/c mice. After 1 month of treatment, a higher bactericidal activity was observed for the B25D0.6M200U200 and the B25D0.6M200 regimen compared to the standard H10R10Z150E100 regimen. Furthermore, 3 months of therapy with both BDM-based regimens resulted in negative lung cultures, whereas all H10R10Z150E100 treated mice were still culture positive. After 3 months of therapy 7% and 13% of mice relapsed receiving B25D0.6M200U200 and B25D0.6M200, respectively, compared to 40% for H10R10Z150E100 treatment showing an increased sterilizing activity of both BDM-based regimens.

Conclusions: BDM-based regimens, with and without sutezolid, have a higher efficacy than the HRZE regimen in the BALB/c model of TB, with some improvement by adding sutezolid. By translating these results to TB patients, this novel BDMU regimen should be able to reduce treatment duration by 25% compared to HRZE therapy.

Objectives: Performance evaluation of routine laboratory methods to determine the susceptibility of Enterobacterales urinary isolates to fosfomycin (oral administration) and mecillinam.

Methods: We collected 347 Enterobacterales isolates from monomicrobial midstream urine samples from women with significant bacteriuria and leukocyturia. Mostly non-Escherichia coli isolates (i.e. Klebsiella spp., Citrobacter koseri, Enterobacter cloacae complex and Proteus mirabilis) were included (n = 298). Performance of VITEK®2, ETEST®, and disc diffusion to determine fosfomycin and mecillinam susceptibility was evaluated following International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 20776-2:2021 (or 20776-2:2007 for disc diffusion) in comparison with the agar dilution reference method.

Results: For fosfomycin testing, VITEK®2 and ETEST® were close to reaching ISO requirements (essential agreement  ≥ 90%; bias  ±30%) for C. koseri, E. coli and P. mirabilis. Categorical agreement (CA) and major error rates were acceptable for disc diffusion. Fosfomycin displayed lower activity against E. cloacae complex and Klebsiella spp., with MIC50 (minimum inhibitory concentration required to inhibit the growth of 50% of tested isolates) equal to the E. coli EUCAST breakpoint (8 mg/L). For these species, the three alternative techniques overestimated MICs and resistance, and did not meet performance criteria. For mecillinam testing of Enterobacterales isolates, apart from P. mirabilis, ETEST® nearly fulfilled ISO requirements, and CA rates were acceptable for disc diffusion. ISO criteria were reached for C. koseri and E. coli testing with VITEK®2, apart from too high rates of very major errors. For P. mirabilis, performances were unacceptable, whatever the routine method used.

Conclusions: Commercially available tests may serve as alternatives to agar dilution to assess fosfomycin (oral) and mecillinam susceptibility of Enterobacterales urinary isolates, with important interspecies variabilities. Additional studies comprising more fosfomycin- and mecillinam-resistant isolates are needed to strengthen our conclusions.

Objective: To analyse the biliary pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) of continuous infusion (CI) meropenem-vaborbactam (MEM-VBM) in a case series of orthotopic liver transplant (OLT) recipients being treated for Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (KPC-Kp) related biliary tract infections (BTIs) or as preemptive therapy of KPC-Kp rectal colonization.

Methods: Critical OLT recipients receiving CI MEM-VBM (2 g/2 g q8h over 8 h) because of KPC-Kp related BTIs or as preemptive therapy of KPC-Kp rectal colonization, having Kehr's tube positioned and undergoing simultaneous therapeutic drug monitoring of MEM and VBM in plasma and bile were retrospectively assessed. Bile-to-plasma ratio of free steady-state concentrations (fCss) of MEM and VBM was used for assessing biliary penetration. Optimal joint MEM-VBM PK/PD target attainment was defined as MEM fCss/MIC ratio >4 coupled with VBM free area under time-concentration curve (fAUC)/threshold concentration (CT) ratio >24.

Results: Overall, four critical OLT recipients were included. Median bile-to-plasma ratio was 0.32 for MEM (range 0.21-0.79) and 0.40 for VBM (range 0.20-0.77). Biliary MEM-VBM joint PK/PD target attainment was optimal in 3/4 OLT recipients and quasi-optimal in the other one.

Conclusions: The 1:1 proportion between MEM and VBM concentrations was maintained unchanged in the bile, allowing us to assume that the efficacy of MEM-VBM may be appropriate even in the treatment of BTIs. CI administration was an effective strategy for attaining aggressive biliary joint PK/PD targets against pathogens with an MIC up to 2 mg/L.

Background: New antifungal agents are required to mitigate against azole-resistant Aspergillus and drug-resistant non-Aspergillus moulds. The novel orotomide, olorofim (F2G, Manchester, UK), has potent fungicidal activity against Aspergillus including azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus, Lomentospora prolificans and Scedosporium spp. Development of olorofim-specific clinical breakpoints/epidemiological cut-off values requires reliable MIC data.

Objectives: Determine the in vitro activity of olorofim compared with standard antifungals against mould pathogens at an Australian hospital.

Materials and methods: Olorofim MICs were determined for 507 clinical mould isolates using the CLSI M38-A3 standard. MICs of amphotericin B, anidulafungin, posaconazole, voriconazole and isavuconazole were obtained using Sensititre™ YeastOne YO10 and AUSNMRCI panels (Thermo-Fisher Scientific).

Results: A. fumigatus sensu stricto was the commonest species (33.3%) followed by L. prolificans (18.3%), Scedosporium (11.4%) and Fusarium (6%) species. Olorofim modal MICs were ≤0.25 mg/L (MIC90 0.25 mg/L) for all Aspergillus except Aspergillus Section Usti (1 mg/L); MICs for nine azole-resistant/non-wild-type A. fumigatus ranged from 0.008 to 0.125 mg/L. The MIC90 of olorofim for L. prolificans was 0.5 mg/L, 0.25-0.5 mg/L for Scedosporium spp. and 8 mg/L for the F. solani complex but with modal MICs of 0.25 and 0.008 mg/L for F. oxysporum and F. proliferatum complexes, respectively. For Verruconis gallopava (n = 10), the olorofim MIC90 was 0.06 mg/L (voriconazole MIC90 2 mg/L, isavuconazole MICs of 4->8 mg/L). Olorofim had little activity against other dematiaceous moulds including Exophiala species.

Conclusions: Olorofim was highly active against Aspergillus spp. including azole-resistant A. fumigatus, L. prolificans, Scedosporium spp. and some Fusarium species with the new finding of potent activity against V. gallopava.

Objectives: The optimal dosing regimen of caspofungin in adolescents undergoing allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation against Candida spp. is unknown. The study aimed to compare body surface area (BSA)-based and fixed dosing regimens through population pharmacokinetic (PPK) analysis and to optimize dosing regimens likely to achieve therapeutic exposures.

Methods: Opportunistic sampling was used to collect plasma concentrations through a prospective observational pharmacokinetic study. PPK analysis and Monte Carlo simulations (n = 1000) were performed using NONMEM.

Results: A total of 86 samples of 30 adolescents (12-17 years old) were best described by a two-compartment pharmacokinetic model. BSA is the only covariate on clearance and central volume of distribution. For Candida glabrata and Candida albicans, a standard dosing regimen could achieve at least a 90% probability of target attainment for the indicator of AUC0-24/MIC90. Dosing regimen simulations identified a BSA cut-off value of 1.3 m2, where a fixed loading dose (LD) is preferred when BSA ≥ 1.3 m2 and a BSA-based LD is preferred when BSA < 1.3 m2. For maintenance dose (MD), however, the BSA-based dose was proposed, regardless of BSA. The current maximum dosing regimen of LD 70 mg/day and MD 70 mg/day could not result in sufficient antifungal exposure for Candida parapsilosis with MIC90 of 1 mg/L. Furthermore, an LD of 70 mg/day and MD of 60 mg/m2/day rendered 90.4% steady-state trough concentration (Ctrough) over 1 mg/L in the virtual population.

Conclusions: Our study proposed optimized dosing regimens of caspofungin based on AUC0-24/MIC90 or Ctrough, which may support further individualized treatment.