David S. Nedrelow, Jakob M. Townsend, Michael S. Detamore
There is a clinical need for osteochondral scaffolds with complex geometries for restoring articulating joint surfaces. To address that need, 3D-printing has enabled scaffolds to be created with anatomically shaped geometries and interconnected internal architectures, going beyond simple plug-shaped scaffolds that are limited to small, cylindrical, focal defects. A key challenge for restoring articulating joint surfaces with 3D-printed constructs is the mechanical loading environment, particularly to withstand delamination or mechanical failure. Although the mechanical performance of interfacial scaffolds is essential, interface strength testing has rarely been emphasized in prior studies with stratified scaffolds. In the pioneering studies where interface strength was assessed, varying methods were employed, which has made direct comparisons difficult. Therefore, the current review focused on 3D-printed scaffolds for osteochondral applications with an emphasis on interface integration and biomechanical evaluation. This 3D-printing focus included both multiphasic cylindrical scaffolds and anatomically shaped scaffolds. Combinations of different 3D-printing methods (e.g., fused deposition modeling, stereolithography, bioprinting with pneumatic extrusion of cell-laden hydrogels) have been employed in a handful of studies to integrate osteoinductive and chondroinductive regions into a single scaffold. Most 3D-printed multiphasic structures utilized either an interdigitating or a mechanical interlocking design to strengthen the construct interface and to prevent delamination during function. The most effective approach to combine phases may be to infill a robust 3D-printed osteal polymer with an interlocking chondral phase hydrogel. Mechanical interlocking is therefore recommended for scaling up multiphasic scaffold applications to larger anatomically shaped joint surface regeneration. For the evaluation of layer integration, the interface shear test is recommended to avoid artifacts or variability that may be associated with alternative approaches that require adhesives or mechanical grips. The 3D-printing literature with interfacial scaffolds provides a compelling foundation for continued work toward successful regeneration of injured or diseased osteochondral tissues in load-bearing joints such as the knee, hip, or temporomandibular joint.
{"title":"Osteochondral Regeneration With Anatomical Scaffold 3D-Printing—Design Considerations for Interface Integration","authors":"David S. Nedrelow, Jakob M. Townsend, Michael S. Detamore","doi":"10.1002/jbm.a.37804","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jbm.a.37804","url":null,"abstract":"<p>There is a clinical need for osteochondral scaffolds with complex geometries for restoring articulating joint surfaces. To address that need, 3D-printing has enabled scaffolds to be created with anatomically shaped geometries and interconnected internal architectures, going beyond simple plug-shaped scaffolds that are limited to small, cylindrical, focal defects. A key challenge for restoring articulating joint surfaces with 3D-printed constructs is the mechanical loading environment, particularly to withstand delamination or mechanical failure. Although the mechanical performance of interfacial scaffolds is essential, interface strength testing has rarely been emphasized in prior studies with stratified scaffolds. In the pioneering studies where interface strength was assessed, varying methods were employed, which has made direct comparisons difficult. Therefore, the current review focused on 3D-printed scaffolds for osteochondral applications with an emphasis on interface integration and biomechanical evaluation. This 3D-printing focus included both multiphasic cylindrical scaffolds and anatomically shaped scaffolds. Combinations of different 3D-printing methods (e.g., fused deposition modeling, stereolithography, bioprinting with pneumatic extrusion of cell-laden hydrogels) have been employed in a handful of studies to integrate osteoinductive and chondroinductive regions into a single scaffold. Most 3D-printed multiphasic structures utilized either an interdigitating or a mechanical interlocking design to strengthen the construct interface and to prevent delamination during function. The most effective approach to combine phases may be to infill a robust 3D-printed osteal polymer with an interlocking chondral phase hydrogel. Mechanical interlocking is therefore recommended for scaling up multiphasic scaffold applications to larger anatomically shaped joint surface regeneration. For the evaluation of layer integration, the interface shear test is recommended to avoid artifacts or variability that may be associated with alternative approaches that require adhesives or mechanical grips. The 3D-printing literature with interfacial scaffolds provides a compelling foundation for continued work toward successful regeneration of injured or diseased osteochondral tissues in load-bearing joints such as the knee, hip, or temporomandibular joint.</p>","PeriodicalId":15142,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A","volume":"113 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jbm.a.37804","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142484154","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Christopher Y. Leon-Valdivieso, Audrey Bethry, Coline Pinese, Michèle Dai, Christian Pompee, Jean-Marc Pernot, Xavier Garric
Collagen gels are the standard dermal equivalents par excellence, however the problem of rapid cell-mediated contraction remains unresolved. Therefore, the development of hybrid constructs (HCs) based on collagen and polymeric scaffolds is proposed to address the mechanical instability that usually limits the formation of new, functional tissue. Equally important, these synthetic structures should be temporary (degradable) while ensuring that cells are well-adapted to the new extracellular environment. In this study, we screened a library of scaffolds made of various polymers, including homopolymers of polycaprolactone (PCL) and poly D,L-lactide (PLA50), their blends (PCL/PLA50), and copolymers (poly(D,L-lactide-co-caprolactone), PCLLA50) to prepare HCs in a layer-by-layer fashion. The properties of polymers and copolymers along with their processability by electrospinning and 3D-printing were evaluated. Then, we assessed the HCs resistance toward cell-mediated contraction as well as the degradation of the polymeric scaffolds. Our results indicate that scaffolds with higher PLA50 content (e.g., PLA50 100%, PCL/PLA50 or PCLLA50, both at 50/50 caprolactone-to-D,L-lactide molar ratio) presented more drawbacks in terms of handleability and processing, while those with greater PCL presence showed structural steadiness and ease to use. All the scaffolds integrated well with the collagen gel to form the corresponding HCs. With few exceptions, the HCs demonstrated good resistance to cell-derived contraction over 3 weeks. Notably, HCs based on PCLLA50 90/10 (both versions, electrospun or 3D-printed) performed best, showing only a 5%–17% area reduction compared to the 93% observed in collagen-only gels. This copolymer displayed hydrolytic degradation depending on its shape, with up to 45% and 65% loss of molecular weight for the electrospun and 3D-printed forms, respectively, correlating with their progressive change in mechanical features. HCs containing PCLLA50 90/10 also exhibited a better fibroblast distribution, enhanced myofibroblastic differentiation, and a three-fold increase in cell proliferation (when the electrospun type was used) compared to collagen controls. These findings were instrumental in selecting a potential HC that might be used for future experiments in vivo.
{"title":"Engineering Shape to Overcome Contraction: The Role of Polymer–Collagen Hybrids in Advanced Dermal Substitutes","authors":"Christopher Y. Leon-Valdivieso, Audrey Bethry, Coline Pinese, Michèle Dai, Christian Pompee, Jean-Marc Pernot, Xavier Garric","doi":"10.1002/jbm.a.37805","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jbm.a.37805","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Collagen gels are the standard dermal equivalents par excellence, however the problem of rapid cell-mediated contraction remains unresolved. Therefore, the development of hybrid constructs (HCs) based on collagen and polymeric scaffolds is proposed to address the mechanical instability that usually limits the formation of new, functional tissue. Equally important, these synthetic structures should be temporary (degradable) while ensuring that cells are well-adapted to the new extracellular environment. In this study, we screened a library of scaffolds made of various polymers, including homopolymers of polycaprolactone (PCL) and poly D,L-lactide (PLA<sub>50</sub>), their blends (PCL/PLA<sub>50</sub>), and copolymers (poly(D,L-lactide-<i>co</i>-caprolactone), PCLLA<sub>50</sub>) to prepare HCs in a layer-by-layer fashion. The properties of polymers and copolymers along with their processability by electrospinning and 3D-printing were evaluated. Then, we assessed the HCs resistance toward cell-mediated contraction as well as the degradation of the polymeric scaffolds. Our results indicate that scaffolds with higher PLA<sub>50</sub> content (e.g., PLA<sub>50</sub> 100%, PCL/PLA<sub>50</sub> or PCLLA<sub>50</sub>, both at 50/50 caprolactone-to-D,L-lactide molar ratio) presented more drawbacks in terms of handleability and processing, while those with greater PCL presence showed structural steadiness and ease to use. All the scaffolds integrated well with the collagen gel to form the corresponding HCs. With few exceptions, the HCs demonstrated good resistance to cell-derived contraction over 3 weeks. Notably, HCs based on PCLLA<sub>50</sub> 90/10 (both versions, electrospun or 3D-printed) performed best, showing only a 5%–17% area reduction compared to the 93% observed in collagen-only gels. This copolymer displayed hydrolytic degradation depending on its shape, with up to 45% and 65% loss of molecular weight for the electrospun and 3D-printed forms, respectively, correlating with their progressive change in mechanical features. HCs containing PCLLA<sub>50</sub> 90/10 also exhibited a better fibroblast distribution, enhanced myofibroblastic differentiation, and a three-fold increase in cell proliferation (when the electrospun type was used) compared to collagen controls. These findings were instrumental in selecting a potential HC that might be used for future experiments in vivo.</p>","PeriodicalId":15142,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A","volume":"113 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jbm.a.37805","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142396327","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Kanakarajan V. Pratheesh, Reshma S. Nair, Chandramohanan Purnima, Reshmi Raj, Manjula P. Mony, Chandrika S. Geetha, Praveen K. Sobhan, Rekha M. Ramesan, Prabha D. Nair, Lynda V. Thomas, Thapasimuthu Vijayamma Anilkumar
Hydrogel formulations of xenogeneic extracellular matrices have been widely used for topical wound care because of their exceptional tunability over other formulations like lyophilized sheets, powders, non-injectable gels, pastes, and ointments. This is important in the treatment of wounds with irregular shapes and depth. This study identified an injectable hydrogel formulation of porcine cholecyst extracellular matrix (60%) in medical-grade carboxymethyl cellulose (40%) as vehicle and evaluated its biomaterial properties. Further, an in-depth evaluation of in vivo wound healing efficacy was conducted in a rat full-thickness skin excision wound healing model, which revealed that the hydrogel formulation accelerated wound healing process compared to wounds treated with a commercial formulation and untreated wounds. The hydrogel appeared to have promoted a desirable pro-regenerative tissue reaction predominated by Th2 helper lymphocytes and M2 macrophages as well as an effective collagen remodeling indicative of diminished scarring. In conclusion, the porcine cholecyst extracellular matrix injectable hydrogel formulation appeared to be a promising candidate formulation as an advanced wound care biomaterial for faster healing of skin wounds with minimal scarring.
{"title":"An injectable hydrogel of porcine cholecyst extracellular matrix for accelerated wound healing","authors":"Kanakarajan V. Pratheesh, Reshma S. Nair, Chandramohanan Purnima, Reshmi Raj, Manjula P. Mony, Chandrika S. Geetha, Praveen K. Sobhan, Rekha M. Ramesan, Prabha D. Nair, Lynda V. Thomas, Thapasimuthu Vijayamma Anilkumar","doi":"10.1002/jbm.a.37795","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jbm.a.37795","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Hydrogel formulations of xenogeneic extracellular matrices have been widely used for topical wound care because of their exceptional tunability over other formulations like lyophilized sheets, powders, non-injectable gels, pastes, and ointments. This is important in the treatment of wounds with irregular shapes and depth. This study identified an injectable hydrogel formulation of porcine cholecyst extracellular matrix (60%) in medical-grade carboxymethyl cellulose (40%) as vehicle and evaluated its biomaterial properties. Further, an in-depth evaluation of <i>in vivo</i> wound healing efficacy was conducted in a rat full-thickness skin excision wound healing model, which revealed that the hydrogel formulation accelerated wound healing process compared to wounds treated with a commercial formulation and untreated wounds. The hydrogel appeared to have promoted a desirable pro-regenerative tissue reaction predominated by Th2 helper lymphocytes and M2 macrophages as well as an effective collagen remodeling indicative of diminished scarring. In conclusion, the porcine cholecyst extracellular matrix injectable hydrogel formulation appeared to be a promising candidate formulation as an advanced wound care biomaterial for faster healing of skin wounds with minimal scarring.</p>","PeriodicalId":15142,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A","volume":"113 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142396326","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}