首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Arrhythmia最新文献

英文 中文
Reduced Left Atrial Appendage Flow Velocity as a Risk of Thromboembolic Events After Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation 房颤导管消融后左心耳血流速度降低对血栓栓塞事件的影响
IF 1.7 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2025-12-10 DOI: 10.1002/joa3.70233
Shintaro Yamagami, Satoshi Shizuta, Munekazu Tanaka, Shushi Nishiwaki, Takanori Aizawa, Akihiro Komasa, Takashi Yoshizawa, Tetsuma Kawaji, Chihiro Ota, Naoaki Onishi, Yasuhiro Sasaki, Mitsuhiko Yahata, Kentaro Nakai, Mamoru Hayano, Tetsushi Nakao, Koji Hanazawa, Koji Goto, Takahiro Doi, Toshihiro Tamura, Koh Ono, Takeshi Kimura

Background

Reduced left atrial appendage flow velocity (LAAFV) on transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is recognized as a predictor of thromboembolic events (TEs) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, its long-term prognostic value following AF ablation remains unclear.

Methods and Results

We retrospectively evaluated 1521 patients undergoing AF ablation who underwent preprocedural TEE. Patients were categorized into two groups based on LAAFV: reduced (≤ 21.4 cm/s, n = 99) and preserved (> 21.4 cm/s, n = 1422). The primary outcome was TEs. Secondary outcomes included arrhythmia recurrence and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), defined as a composite of all-cause death, stroke, major bleeding, and heart failure hospitalization, as well as individual components and cardiovascular mortality. Over a mean follow-up of 49 ± 32 months, TEs occurred in 19 patients (1.2%). The 5-year cumulative incidence of TEs was significantly higher in the reduced LAAFV group (6.7% vs. 0.9%, p < 0.0001), despite a lower rate of anticoagulation discontinuation (20.1% vs. 57.1%, p < 0.0001). Multivariable analysis identified reduced LAAFV as an independent predictor of TEs. It was also associated with higher risks for all secondary endpoints.

Conclusions

Reduced preprocedural LAAFV is associated with adverse long-term clinical outcomes after AF ablation, including a significantly increased risk of thromboembolic events.

经食管超声心动图(TEE)左心耳血流速度(LAAFV)降低被认为是心房颤动(AF)患者血栓栓塞事件(TEs)的预测因子。然而,其在房颤消融后的长期预后价值尚不清楚。方法与结果回顾性评价1521例房颤消融术前TEE患者。根据LAAFV分为降低组(≤21.4 cm/s, n = 99)和保留组(≤21.4 cm/s, n = 1422)。主要结局为TEs。次要结局包括心律失常复发和主要心血管不良事件(mace),定义为全因死亡、中风、大出血和心力衰竭住院的复合,以及个体成分和心血管死亡率。在平均49±32个月的随访中,有19例(1.2%)患者发生TEs。LAAFV降低组的5年累计TEs发生率显著高于对照组(6.7% vs. 0.9%, p < 0.0001),尽管抗凝停药率较低(20.1% vs. 57.1%, p < 0.0001)。多变量分析发现LAAFV降低是TEs的独立预测因子。它还与所有次要终点的高风险相关。结论:术前LAAFV降低与房颤消融后不良的长期临床结果相关,包括血栓栓塞事件的风险显著增加。
{"title":"Reduced Left Atrial Appendage Flow Velocity as a Risk of Thromboembolic Events After Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation","authors":"Shintaro Yamagami,&nbsp;Satoshi Shizuta,&nbsp;Munekazu Tanaka,&nbsp;Shushi Nishiwaki,&nbsp;Takanori Aizawa,&nbsp;Akihiro Komasa,&nbsp;Takashi Yoshizawa,&nbsp;Tetsuma Kawaji,&nbsp;Chihiro Ota,&nbsp;Naoaki Onishi,&nbsp;Yasuhiro Sasaki,&nbsp;Mitsuhiko Yahata,&nbsp;Kentaro Nakai,&nbsp;Mamoru Hayano,&nbsp;Tetsushi Nakao,&nbsp;Koji Hanazawa,&nbsp;Koji Goto,&nbsp;Takahiro Doi,&nbsp;Toshihiro Tamura,&nbsp;Koh Ono,&nbsp;Takeshi Kimura","doi":"10.1002/joa3.70233","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/joa3.70233","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Reduced left atrial appendage flow velocity (LAAFV) on transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is recognized as a predictor of thromboembolic events (TEs) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, its long-term prognostic value following AF ablation remains unclear.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods and Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We retrospectively evaluated 1521 patients undergoing AF ablation who underwent preprocedural TEE. Patients were categorized into two groups based on LAAFV: reduced (≤ 21.4 cm/s, <i>n</i> = 99) and preserved (&gt; 21.4 cm/s, <i>n</i> = 1422). The primary outcome was TEs. Secondary outcomes included arrhythmia recurrence and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), defined as a composite of all-cause death, stroke, major bleeding, and heart failure hospitalization, as well as individual components and cardiovascular mortality. Over a mean follow-up of 49 ± 32 months, TEs occurred in 19 patients (1.2%). The 5-year cumulative incidence of TEs was significantly higher in the reduced LAAFV group (6.7% vs. 0.9%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001), despite a lower rate of anticoagulation discontinuation (20.1% vs. 57.1%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001). Multivariable analysis identified reduced LAAFV as an independent predictor of TEs. It was also associated with higher risks for all secondary endpoints.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Reduced preprocedural LAAFV is associated with adverse long-term clinical outcomes after AF ablation, including a significantly increased risk of thromboembolic events.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":15174,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arrhythmia","volume":"41 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/joa3.70233","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145739634","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Brief Comment on “The Role of Ventricular Arrhythmias Inducibility in Arrhythmic Risk Stratification in Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies” “室性心律失常诱导在致心律失常右室心肌病心律失常危险分层中的作用:一项观察性研究的荟萃分析”
IF 1.7 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2025-12-09 DOI: 10.1002/joa3.70254
Sidra Afzal, Nimra Afzal
<p>I read with keen interest the recent meta-analysis by Bazoukis G, Saplaouras A, Pillai N, Efthymiou P, Lee S, Sfairopoulos D, et al. analyzing the role of ventricular arrhythmias (VA) inducibility in arrhythmic risk stratification in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) [<span>1</span>]. All authors are to be acknowledged for summarizing data from different observational studies to shed light on a clinically faced key challenge. This letter focuses on some considerations about methodology and interpretation, which may provide assistance to clinicians in applying these outcomes strategically.</p><p>Firstly, while the meta-analysis aims to provide pooled estimates of studies, the heterogeneity of the included studies requires scrutiny. Different factors such as study design, population, sites of stimulation, inducibility criteria, and different ventricular arrhythmia inducibility protocols played an important role in this variability. Such variations can influence the rate of arrhythmia detection and may restrict the applicability of pooled end results. Acknowledgment of this variability is crucial for the interpretation of risk stratification on the basis of inducibility.</p><p>Secondly, the studies that were included in the meta-analysis were observational, increasing susceptibility to reporting and selection biases. For example, patients being subjected to electrical stimulation could have higher baseline risk profiles leading to a greater association between arrhythmic events and inducibility. Clinicians should reflect on all these confounding factors when projecting outcomes to wider ARVC populations.</p><p>Thirdly, the applicability of VA inducibility for risk prediction remained subtle. While VA inducibility can help in detecting higher-risk patients, it should supplement rather than substitute comprehensive risk assessment comprising diagnostic imaging, genetic assessment, and standard clinical parameters. Different factors such as right ventricular dysfunction, male gender, age, fragmentation of the QRS complex, previous history of ventricular tachyarrhythmia, and syncope on initial evaluation are important predictors of arrhythmic events [<span>2</span>]. Programmed ventricular stimulation offers predictive information only when integrated with a risk calculator [<span>3</span>]. Integration of these modalities reinforces a comprehensive approach towards sudden cardiac death risk stratification in ARVC.</p><p>Lastly, this meta-analysis highlights the importance of multicenter prospective studies with standard protocols. Such studies might offer more reliable estimates of the VA inducibility predictive value and assist in the development of guidelines for the management of ARVC.</p><p>To conclude, authors offered a significant synthesis of recent evidence on VA inducibility in ARVC. Prudent reflection on observational biases, heterogeneity, and incorporation with comprehensive clinical assessment is cruci
我饶有兴趣地阅读了Bazoukis G、Saplaouras A、Pillai N、Efthymiou P、Lee S、Sfairopoulos D等人最近的荟萃分析,分析了室性心律失常(VA)诱发性在致心律失常右室心肌病(ARVC)患者心律失常风险分层中的作用[10]。所有作者总结了来自不同观察性研究的数据,以阐明临床面临的关键挑战。这封信的重点是关于方法和解释的一些考虑,这可能为临床医生在策略性地应用这些结果提供帮助。首先,虽然荟萃分析旨在提供研究的汇总估计,但纳入研究的异质性需要仔细审查。不同的因素,如研究设计、人群、刺激部位、诱导标准和不同的室性心律失常诱导方案,在这种变异性中起着重要作用。这种变化会影响心律失常的检出率,并可能限制汇总最终结果的适用性。承认这种可变性对于在可诱导性的基础上解释风险分层至关重要。其次,纳入meta分析的研究是观察性的,增加了对报告和选择偏差的敏感性。例如,接受电刺激的患者可能具有较高的基线风险,导致心律失常事件与诱导性之间存在更大的关联。临床医生在向更广泛的ARVC人群预测结果时,应考虑所有这些混杂因素。第三,风险诱导性对风险预测的适用性仍然不明显。虽然VA诱导可以帮助发现高风险患者,但它应该补充而不是替代包括诊断成像、遗传评估和标准临床参数在内的综合风险评估。不同的因素,如右室功能障碍、男性性别、年龄、QRS复合物的碎片化、室性心动过速史和晕厥的初步评估是心律失常事件[2]的重要预测因素。程序性心室刺激只有在与风险计算器[3]结合时才能提供预测性信息。这些模式的整合加强了对ARVC中心源性猝死风险分层的综合方法。最后,本荟萃分析强调了采用标准方案进行多中心前瞻性研究的重要性。这些研究可能提供更可靠的VA诱导性预测价值,并有助于制定ARVC管理指南。总之,作者对ARVC中VA诱导性的最新证据进行了重要的综合。谨慎地反思观察偏倚、异质性,并结合全面的临床评估,对于实际实现这些结果至关重要。作者声明无利益冲突。
{"title":"Brief Comment on “The Role of Ventricular Arrhythmias Inducibility in Arrhythmic Risk Stratification in Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies”","authors":"Sidra Afzal,&nbsp;Nimra Afzal","doi":"10.1002/joa3.70254","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/joa3.70254","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;I read with keen interest the recent meta-analysis by Bazoukis G, Saplaouras A, Pillai N, Efthymiou P, Lee S, Sfairopoulos D, et al. analyzing the role of ventricular arrhythmias (VA) inducibility in arrhythmic risk stratification in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) [&lt;span&gt;1&lt;/span&gt;]. All authors are to be acknowledged for summarizing data from different observational studies to shed light on a clinically faced key challenge. This letter focuses on some considerations about methodology and interpretation, which may provide assistance to clinicians in applying these outcomes strategically.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Firstly, while the meta-analysis aims to provide pooled estimates of studies, the heterogeneity of the included studies requires scrutiny. Different factors such as study design, population, sites of stimulation, inducibility criteria, and different ventricular arrhythmia inducibility protocols played an important role in this variability. Such variations can influence the rate of arrhythmia detection and may restrict the applicability of pooled end results. Acknowledgment of this variability is crucial for the interpretation of risk stratification on the basis of inducibility.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Secondly, the studies that were included in the meta-analysis were observational, increasing susceptibility to reporting and selection biases. For example, patients being subjected to electrical stimulation could have higher baseline risk profiles leading to a greater association between arrhythmic events and inducibility. Clinicians should reflect on all these confounding factors when projecting outcomes to wider ARVC populations.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thirdly, the applicability of VA inducibility for risk prediction remained subtle. While VA inducibility can help in detecting higher-risk patients, it should supplement rather than substitute comprehensive risk assessment comprising diagnostic imaging, genetic assessment, and standard clinical parameters. Different factors such as right ventricular dysfunction, male gender, age, fragmentation of the QRS complex, previous history of ventricular tachyarrhythmia, and syncope on initial evaluation are important predictors of arrhythmic events [&lt;span&gt;2&lt;/span&gt;]. Programmed ventricular stimulation offers predictive information only when integrated with a risk calculator [&lt;span&gt;3&lt;/span&gt;]. Integration of these modalities reinforces a comprehensive approach towards sudden cardiac death risk stratification in ARVC.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Lastly, this meta-analysis highlights the importance of multicenter prospective studies with standard protocols. Such studies might offer more reliable estimates of the VA inducibility predictive value and assist in the development of guidelines for the management of ARVC.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;To conclude, authors offered a significant synthesis of recent evidence on VA inducibility in ARVC. Prudent reflection on observational biases, heterogeneity, and incorporation with comprehensive clinical assessment is cruci","PeriodicalId":15174,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arrhythmia","volume":"41 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/joa3.70254","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145739455","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Phase Variance Analysis for Identifying Heterogeneous Conduction Regions in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: Impact of Recording Duration 鉴别持续性心房颤动非均匀传导区的相位方差分析:记录时间的影响
IF 1.7 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2025-12-09 DOI: 10.1002/joa3.70246
Hiroshi Seno, Yilin Wang, Toshiya Kojima, Tsukasa Oshima, Kenichiro Yamagata, Masatoshi Yamazaki, Ichiro Sakuma, Katsuhito Fujiu, Naoki Tomii

Background

Phase variance analysis, which quantifies the spatial heterogeneity of local activation, has been proposed as a method to characterize complex conduction patterns in atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the influence of recording duration on its reliability remains unclear. This study aimed to determine how recording duration affects the accuracy and reproducibility of identifying heterogeneous conduction regions by phase variance analysis.

Methods

Intracardiac electrogram recordings (30 s) were obtained from 16 left atrial sites in 5 patients with persistent AF. A reference phase variance map (REF) was generated by averaging instantaneous phase variance maps over the full 30-s dataset to represent the frequency of local conduction heterogeneity. Thirteen recording durations (0.01–25 s) were defined as experimental conditions. For each duration, 100 randomly selected segments were extracted, and estimated phase variance maps (ESTs) were computed using the same temporal averaging method. Accuracy was evaluated by calculating the structural similarity index measure (SSIM) between ESTs and REF, while reproducibility was assessed using pixel-wise standard deviations across subsamplings.

Results

Longer recording durations produced higher SSIM values and lower standard deviations. With durations ≥ 10 s, SSIM consistently exceeded 0.95, including outliers, and standard deviations fell below 0.015, indicating accurate and stable estimation of complex conduction patterns.

Conclusions

Adequate recording duration enables accurate and reproducible estimation of heterogeneous conduction regions using phase variance analysis, even in persistent AF with complex conduction patterns. This method may support optimal ablation target selection and improve treatment outcomes.

相位方差分析量化了局部激活的空间异质性,已被提出作为表征心房颤动(AF)复杂传导模式的方法。然而,记录时间对其可靠性的影响尚不清楚。本研究旨在确定记录时间如何影响相方差分析识别非均匀传导区的准确性和再现性。方法获取5例持续性房颤患者16个左心房30秒的心内电记录,通过对30秒数据集的瞬时相方差图进行平均,生成参考相方差图(REF),以代表局部传导异质性的频率。13个记录时间(0.01 ~ 25 s)定义为实验条件。在每个持续时间内,随机抽取100个片段,并使用相同的时间平均方法计算估计的相位方差图(est)。通过计算ESTs和REF之间的结构相似指数(SSIM)来评估准确性,而使用跨子样本的逐像素标准差来评估再现性。结果记录时间越长,SSIM值越高,标准差越低。当持续时间≥10 s时,SSIM持续超过0.95,包括异常值,标准差低于0.015,表明复杂传导模式的估计准确稳定。充分的记录时间可以使用相位方差分析准确和可重复地估计非均匀传导区域,即使在具有复杂传导模式的持续性房颤中也是如此。该方法可支持最佳消融靶点选择,改善治疗效果。
{"title":"Phase Variance Analysis for Identifying Heterogeneous Conduction Regions in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: Impact of Recording Duration","authors":"Hiroshi Seno,&nbsp;Yilin Wang,&nbsp;Toshiya Kojima,&nbsp;Tsukasa Oshima,&nbsp;Kenichiro Yamagata,&nbsp;Masatoshi Yamazaki,&nbsp;Ichiro Sakuma,&nbsp;Katsuhito Fujiu,&nbsp;Naoki Tomii","doi":"10.1002/joa3.70246","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/joa3.70246","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Phase variance analysis, which quantifies the spatial heterogeneity of local activation, has been proposed as a method to characterize complex conduction patterns in atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the influence of recording duration on its reliability remains unclear. This study aimed to determine how recording duration affects the accuracy and reproducibility of identifying heterogeneous conduction regions by phase variance analysis.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Intracardiac electrogram recordings (30 s) were obtained from 16 left atrial sites in 5 patients with persistent AF. A reference phase variance map (REF) was generated by averaging instantaneous phase variance maps over the full 30-s dataset to represent the frequency of local conduction heterogeneity. Thirteen recording durations (0.01–25 s) were defined as experimental conditions. For each duration, 100 randomly selected segments were extracted, and estimated phase variance maps (ESTs) were computed using the same temporal averaging method. Accuracy was evaluated by calculating the structural similarity index measure (SSIM) between ESTs and REF, while reproducibility was assessed using pixel-wise standard deviations across subsamplings.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Longer recording durations produced higher SSIM values and lower standard deviations. With durations ≥ 10 s, SSIM consistently exceeded 0.95, including outliers, and standard deviations fell below 0.015, indicating accurate and stable estimation of complex conduction patterns.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Adequate recording duration enables accurate and reproducible estimation of heterogeneous conduction regions using phase variance analysis, even in persistent AF with complex conduction patterns. This method may support optimal ablation target selection and improve treatment outcomes.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":15174,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arrhythmia","volume":"41 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/joa3.70246","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145739487","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Revisiting the Interpretation of Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing “Availability” After Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Methodological and Data Considerations 心脏再同步化治疗后心肺运动试验“有效性”的重新解释:方法学和数据考虑。
IF 1.7 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2025-12-08 DOI: 10.1002/joa3.70252
Hidetoshi Yanagi
<p>I read with great interest a recent article by Kuhara et al. titled “Factors influencing the availability of cardiopulmonary exercise testing for patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy in Japan” [<span>1</span>].</p><p>This nationwide analysis provides valuable insights into the current state of cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) among patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) or CRT defibrillator (CRT-D) implantation in Japan.</p><p>Although I commend the authors for their valuable contribution to this important area, I would like to highlight several methodological and interpretative considerations that could improve the clarity and reliability of the reported findings.</p><p>A significant numerical inconsistency was noticed between this study and the authors' earlier publications using the same Diagnosis Procedure Combination (DPC) dataset [<span>2</span>].</p><p>Both studies explicitly referenced the same ethics approval code (R2-007, University of Occupational and Environmental Health) and covered an identical study period (2014–2018).</p><p>In the 2022 study, 6531 CRT and CRT-D devices were included after excluding patients aged < 15 years and emergency admissions.</p><p>Conversely, the current report states that only 3965 CRT/CRT-D cases were initially identified, and 3859 were retained for analysis following exclusion.</p><p>Given an identical data source and timeframe, a 39% reduction in eligible cases raises concerns about potential changes in the extraction codes, diagnostic inclusion criteria, or exclusion logic.</p><p>Clarifying the precise differences in data selection between the two analyses is essential for reproducibility and to determine whether the present cohort represents a subset of a previously published population.</p><p>As noted by the authors, approximately 21% of hospitals in Japan are equipped with CPET systems.</p><p>Consequently, many patients in the DPC dataset were hospitalized in facilities where CPET could not be performed.</p><p>Including such cases in the same regression model may have introduced bias in the estimated odds ratios, as “no CPET” outcomes in these hospitals reflect institutional capability rather than patient-related factors.</p><p>A stratified or multilevel logistic model limited to CPET-capable hospitals or a sensitivity analysis including hospitals with at least one recorded CPET would help isolate true patient-level determinants from structural constraints. This adjustment would also allow for a clear separation between facility-level accessibility and individual-level clinical determinants.</p><p>In the multivariate model, both the Barthel Index and rehabilitation type (none, other, or cardiac) were included as explanatory variables.</p><p>However, in real-world practice, the Barthel Index (Activities of Daily Living (ADL) score) is a major determinant of whether a patient receives cardiac or other forms of rehabilitation.</p><p>When cardiac rehabi
我饶有兴趣地阅读了Kuhara等人最近发表的一篇文章,题为“影响日本心脏再同步化治疗患者心肺运动测试可用性的因素”。这项全国性的分析为日本接受心脏再同步化治疗(CRT)或CRT除颤器(CRT- d)植入的患者的心肺运动试验(CPET)的现状提供了有价值的见解。虽然我赞扬作者对这一重要领域的宝贵贡献,但我想强调几个方法和解释方面的考虑,这些考虑可以提高报告结果的清晰度和可靠性。本研究与作者使用相同诊断程序组合(DPC)数据集[2]的早期出版物之间存在显著的数值不一致。两项研究明确引用了相同的伦理批准准则(R2-007,职业与环境卫生大学),涵盖了相同的研究期(2014-2018)。在2022年的研究中,在排除了15岁和急诊入院的患者后,纳入了6531台CRT和CRT- d设备。相反,目前的报告指出,最初确定的CRT/CRT- d病例只有3965例,排除后保留3859例进行分析。在相同的数据源和时间框架下,符合条件的病例减少39%引起了对提取代码、诊断纳入标准或排除逻辑的潜在变化的关注。澄清两种分析在数据选择上的精确差异对于可重复性和确定当前队列是否代表先前发表的人群的一个子集至关重要。正如作者所指出的,日本大约21%的医院配备了CPET系统。因此,DPC数据集中的许多患者在无法进行CPET的设施中住院。将此类病例纳入同一回归模型可能会在估计的优势比中引入偏差,因为这些医院的“无CPET”结果反映的是机构能力,而不是患者相关因素。分层或多层logistic模型仅限于有CPET能力的医院,或包括至少有一个CPET记录的医院的敏感性分析将有助于从结构约束中分离出真正的患者水平决定因素。这一调整还将允许明确区分设施级别的可及性和个人级别的临床决定因素。在多变量模型中,Barthel指数和康复类型(无、其他或心脏)均被纳入解释变量。然而,在现实世界中,Barthel指数(日常生活活动(ADL)评分)是患者是否接受心脏或其他形式康复的主要决定因素。当心脏康复开始时,CPET经常作为评估或运动处方的一部分进行。因此,“Barthel指数→心脏康复→CPET”的中介通路是非常可信的。在同一模型中包含这两个变量可能表示统计过度调整,从而减弱功能状态的真实影响。此外,作者指出,“ADL较高的患者或接受心脏康复的患者更有可能接受CPET。”这种解释隐含地假设心脏康复先于CPET。然而,在临床实践中,CPET通常在心脏康复之前或作为心脏康复的一部分进行。指定这个时间序列将大大加强分析的概念准确性。我们的机构临床数据为CPET实践提供了一个明显不同的视角,在这个环境中,测试能力是可靠的。在我们之前发表的[3]队列中,包括659名植入心脏除颤器(ICD)或CRT-D的患者,他们参加了一个全面的心脏康复(CCR)项目,420名患者(64%)在CCR开始时进行了CPET。特别是在CRT-D接受者中,同一队列的CPET执行率约为63%。这一比率与基于dpc的全国分析报告的3% CPET比率形成鲜明对比。这一差异强烈表明,纳入缺乏CPET能力的医院导致了对实际利用率的严重低估。这些发现共同表明,CPET在日本的可用性在很大程度上受到设施资源而不是患者选择的限制。解决这些问题将加强这项有价值的全国性调查的有效性和可解释性。我真诚地感谢作者对理解日本CRT后运动测试的贡献,并希望这些评论将有助于进一步完善基于dpc的分析。本研究得到了日本科学促进会KAKENHI(资助号24K20490)的支持。作者声明无利益冲突。
{"title":"Revisiting the Interpretation of Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing “Availability” After Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Methodological and Data Considerations","authors":"Hidetoshi Yanagi","doi":"10.1002/joa3.70252","DOIUrl":"10.1002/joa3.70252","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;I read with great interest a recent article by Kuhara et al. titled “Factors influencing the availability of cardiopulmonary exercise testing for patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy in Japan” [&lt;span&gt;1&lt;/span&gt;].&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This nationwide analysis provides valuable insights into the current state of cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) among patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) or CRT defibrillator (CRT-D) implantation in Japan.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Although I commend the authors for their valuable contribution to this important area, I would like to highlight several methodological and interpretative considerations that could improve the clarity and reliability of the reported findings.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A significant numerical inconsistency was noticed between this study and the authors' earlier publications using the same Diagnosis Procedure Combination (DPC) dataset [&lt;span&gt;2&lt;/span&gt;].&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Both studies explicitly referenced the same ethics approval code (R2-007, University of Occupational and Environmental Health) and covered an identical study period (2014–2018).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In the 2022 study, 6531 CRT and CRT-D devices were included after excluding patients aged &lt; 15 years and emergency admissions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Conversely, the current report states that only 3965 CRT/CRT-D cases were initially identified, and 3859 were retained for analysis following exclusion.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Given an identical data source and timeframe, a 39% reduction in eligible cases raises concerns about potential changes in the extraction codes, diagnostic inclusion criteria, or exclusion logic.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Clarifying the precise differences in data selection between the two analyses is essential for reproducibility and to determine whether the present cohort represents a subset of a previously published population.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As noted by the authors, approximately 21% of hospitals in Japan are equipped with CPET systems.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Consequently, many patients in the DPC dataset were hospitalized in facilities where CPET could not be performed.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Including such cases in the same regression model may have introduced bias in the estimated odds ratios, as “no CPET” outcomes in these hospitals reflect institutional capability rather than patient-related factors.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A stratified or multilevel logistic model limited to CPET-capable hospitals or a sensitivity analysis including hospitals with at least one recorded CPET would help isolate true patient-level determinants from structural constraints. This adjustment would also allow for a clear separation between facility-level accessibility and individual-level clinical determinants.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In the multivariate model, both the Barthel Index and rehabilitation type (none, other, or cardiac) were included as explanatory variables.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;However, in real-world practice, the Barthel Index (Activities of Daily Living (ADL) score) is a major determinant of whether a patient receives cardiac or other forms of rehabilitation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;When cardiac rehabi","PeriodicalId":15174,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arrhythmia","volume":"41 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12686115/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145723587","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Clinical Considerations Regarding Pacemaker Syndrome Under VVIR Pacing VVIR起搏下起搏器综合征的临床考虑
IF 1.7 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2025-12-08 DOI: 10.1002/joa3.70255
Naoya Kataoka, Teruhiko Imamura
<p>The authors should be commended for conducting a rigorously designed study in which pacemaker syndrome (PMS) was defined using both subjective symptoms and objective improvement following restoration of AV synchrony [<span>1</span>]. This approach is particularly important because the clinical diagnosis of PMS is often challenging, especially in older adults whose symptoms are sometimes nonspecific. Their finding that a higher physical activity index predicts PMS is intuitively acceptable, yet it is meaningful that this relationship was demonstrated quantitatively. Several issues merit further clarification and discussion.</p><p>In this study, PMS was evaluated after switching all dual-chamber pacemakers to VVIR mode at discharge [<span>1</span>]. In real-world practice, however, VVIR pacing is rarely selected in patients with intact sinus rhythm, except in limited settings such as permanent atrial fibrillation with bradycardia. Modern leadless pacemakers now provide VDD (Micra AV) or DDD (Aveir DR) capabilities, and VVIR activation during sinus rhythm is uncommon in contemporary clinical practice [<span>2, 3</span>]. Therefore, we would appreciate clarification regarding the clinical scenarios the authors envision where these findings would alter pacing-mode decision-making. Does the discussion refer to older single-chamber VVI devices, resource-limited settings, or a theoretical framework for physiological understanding? The relevance of PMS induced under intentionally dyssynchronous conditions, which are rarely encountered in modern practice, deserves further elaboration.</p><p>The authors propose that increased physical activity exacerbates atrial contraction against a closed mitral valve, leading to PMS [<span>1</span>]. However, this explanation is based on physiologic speculation rather than direct hemodynamic measurements. An alternative mechanism may exist in patients with preserved sinus node function but impaired AV conduction. During exercise, the sinus rate may exceed the VVIR pacing rate at a certain workload, causing intermittent intrinsic beats with higher degrees of AV block. This could reproduce the hemodynamics of advanced AV block and provoke exertional dyspnea even without classical PMS mechanisms.</p><p>Cardiopulmonary exercise testing combined with pacing-mode changes might have provided objective insight into the precise workload at which symptoms began. Such physiologic data could meaningfully strengthen the mechanistic conclusions.</p><p>The authors briefly mention dyssynchrony as a contributor to PMS [<span>1</span>]. Given the rapid adoption of conduction-system pacing (His-bundle or left bundle branch pacing), which substantially reduces ventricular dyssynchrony, it would be valuable to consider whether PMS occurs—or is mitigated—under conduction-system pacing strategies [<span>4</span>]. This question is clinically relevant because newer pacing modalities aim to preserve or restore physiologic synchrony, potential
作者应该受到赞扬,因为他们进行了一项严格设计的研究,在这项研究中,起搏器综合征(PMS)的定义是通过主观症状和室间隔同步性bbb恢复后的客观改善来确定的。这种方法尤其重要,因为经前症候群的临床诊断往往具有挑战性,特别是在症状有时非特异性的老年人中。他们的研究发现,较高的体育活动指数可以预测经前症候群,这在直觉上是可以接受的,然而,这种关系被定量地证明是有意义的。有几个问题值得进一步澄清和讨论。在这项研究中,在放电b[1]时,将所有双室起搏器切换到VVIR模式后,评估PMS。然而,在现实世界的实践中,除了永久性房颤合并心动过缓等有限的情况外,很少对窦性心律完整的患者选择VVIR起搏。现代无导线起搏器现在提供VDD (Micra AV)或DDD (Aveir DR)功能,在当代临床实践中,在窦性心律期间激活VVIR并不常见[2,3]。因此,我们希望对作者设想的临床场景进行澄清,这些发现将改变步调模式决策。讨论是否涉及旧的单腔VVI装置,资源有限的设置,或生理理解的理论框架?在现代实践中很少遇到的故意不同步条件下引起的经前综合症的相关性值得进一步阐述。作者提出,增加体力活动加剧心房收缩,导致二尖瓣关闭,导致经前症候群[1]。然而,这种解释是基于生理推测,而不是直接的血液动力学测量。在保留窦房结功能但房室传导受损的患者中可能存在另一种机制。在运动过程中,窦性心率在一定负荷下可能超过VVIR起搏速率,引起间歇性内禀心跳,房颤阻滞程度较高。这可能重现晚期房室传导阻滞的血流动力学,即使没有经典的经前症候群机制,也会引起运动性呼吸困难。心肺运动试验结合起搏模式的改变,可能为症状开始时的确切工作量提供了客观的见解。这些生理数据可以有意义地加强机制结论。作者简要地提到不同步是PMS[1]的一个贡献者。鉴于传导系统起搏(his束或左束分支起搏)的迅速采用,大大减少了心室非同步化,考虑传导系统起搏策略[4]下PMS是否发生或减轻将是有价值的。这个问题与临床相关,因为新的起搏方式旨在保持或恢复生理同步,潜在地改变PMS的发病率或表达。作者没有什么可报告的。作者没有什么可报告的。作者没有什么可报告的。作者声明无利益冲突。作者没有什么可报告的。
{"title":"Clinical Considerations Regarding Pacemaker Syndrome Under VVIR Pacing","authors":"Naoya Kataoka,&nbsp;Teruhiko Imamura","doi":"10.1002/joa3.70255","DOIUrl":"10.1002/joa3.70255","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;The authors should be commended for conducting a rigorously designed study in which pacemaker syndrome (PMS) was defined using both subjective symptoms and objective improvement following restoration of AV synchrony [&lt;span&gt;1&lt;/span&gt;]. This approach is particularly important because the clinical diagnosis of PMS is often challenging, especially in older adults whose symptoms are sometimes nonspecific. Their finding that a higher physical activity index predicts PMS is intuitively acceptable, yet it is meaningful that this relationship was demonstrated quantitatively. Several issues merit further clarification and discussion.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In this study, PMS was evaluated after switching all dual-chamber pacemakers to VVIR mode at discharge [&lt;span&gt;1&lt;/span&gt;]. In real-world practice, however, VVIR pacing is rarely selected in patients with intact sinus rhythm, except in limited settings such as permanent atrial fibrillation with bradycardia. Modern leadless pacemakers now provide VDD (Micra AV) or DDD (Aveir DR) capabilities, and VVIR activation during sinus rhythm is uncommon in contemporary clinical practice [&lt;span&gt;2, 3&lt;/span&gt;]. Therefore, we would appreciate clarification regarding the clinical scenarios the authors envision where these findings would alter pacing-mode decision-making. Does the discussion refer to older single-chamber VVI devices, resource-limited settings, or a theoretical framework for physiological understanding? The relevance of PMS induced under intentionally dyssynchronous conditions, which are rarely encountered in modern practice, deserves further elaboration.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The authors propose that increased physical activity exacerbates atrial contraction against a closed mitral valve, leading to PMS [&lt;span&gt;1&lt;/span&gt;]. However, this explanation is based on physiologic speculation rather than direct hemodynamic measurements. An alternative mechanism may exist in patients with preserved sinus node function but impaired AV conduction. During exercise, the sinus rate may exceed the VVIR pacing rate at a certain workload, causing intermittent intrinsic beats with higher degrees of AV block. This could reproduce the hemodynamics of advanced AV block and provoke exertional dyspnea even without classical PMS mechanisms.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Cardiopulmonary exercise testing combined with pacing-mode changes might have provided objective insight into the precise workload at which symptoms began. Such physiologic data could meaningfully strengthen the mechanistic conclusions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The authors briefly mention dyssynchrony as a contributor to PMS [&lt;span&gt;1&lt;/span&gt;]. Given the rapid adoption of conduction-system pacing (His-bundle or left bundle branch pacing), which substantially reduces ventricular dyssynchrony, it would be valuable to consider whether PMS occurs—or is mitigated—under conduction-system pacing strategies [&lt;span&gt;4&lt;/span&gt;]. This question is clinically relevant because newer pacing modalities aim to preserve or restore physiologic synchrony, potential","PeriodicalId":15174,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arrhythmia","volume":"41 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12686116/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145723510","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Does Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy Reduce the Incidence of Ventricular Arrhythmias in Patients With HFrEF? 指南指导的药物治疗能降低HFrEF患者室性心律失常的发生率吗?
IF 1.7 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2025-12-08 DOI: 10.1002/joa3.70253
Yu Nomoto, Naoya Kataoka, Teruhiko Imamura

In the present study, among 139 patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) who had a dual chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) or cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator (CRT-D), twelve patients (8.6%) experienced sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT). Of these, seven (58%) were non-compliant with heart failure guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) [1]. This finding suggests a strong correlation between poor adherence to GDMT and the occurrence of VT. Recent reports indicate that the proportion of sudden cardiac death among HFrEF patients has been decreasing, likely due to the advent of novel heart failure medications and the widespread implementation of GDMT [2]. From the perspective of GDMT, we believe several points in this study warrant further discussion.

GDMT was defined as the use of both beta-blockers and a renin–angiotensin system inhibitor (RASi)—including an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, an angiotensin receptor blocker, or an angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor—while mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) and sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors were not included. According to current heart failure guidelines, GDMT now encompasses all four drug classes, including MRAs and SGLT2 inhibitors. Therefore, the definition of GDMT in this study does not fully align with contemporary standards.

The study categorized patients simply based on whether GDMT was administered or not, without considering dose optimization. However, the up-titration of GDMT agents to target or maximally tolerated doses is a key component of effective therapy. Previous studies have shown that patients with HFrEF who achieved up-titration of RASi, beta-blockers, and MRAs had significantly lower mortality rates [3]. While the prescription rate was high in the present study, it remains unclear whether adequate dose escalation was achieved.

Beyond the GDMT perspective, another interesting finding is the high incidence of nonsustained VT, despite the relatively young cohort. Compared with prior studies, this may be due to differences in the underlying etiology. In older populations, valvular heart disease and coronary artery disease are more prevalent, whereas cardiomyopathies may have been overrepresented in this cohort. Therefore, a detailed analysis of the underlying cardiac pathology in these patients would be essential for further interpretation.

The authors have nothing to report.

The authors have nothing to report.

The authors have nothing to report.

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

The manuscript does not include any original data.

在本研究中,139例使用双室植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)或心脏再同步化除颤器(CRT-D)的心力衰竭伴射血分数降低(HFrEF)患者中,12例(8.6%)患者经历了持续性室性心动过速(VT)。其中,7例(58%)不符合心力衰竭指导药物治疗(GDMT)[1]。这一发现表明,较差的GDMT依从性与VT的发生之间存在很强的相关性。最近的报道表明,HFrEF患者的心源性猝死比例一直在下降,这可能是由于新型心力衰竭药物的出现和GDMT[2]的广泛实施。从GDMT的角度来看,我们认为本研究中有几点值得进一步讨论。GDMT被定义为使用β受体阻滞剂和肾素-血管紧张素系统抑制剂(RASi),包括血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂、血管紧张素受体阻滞剂或血管紧张素受体-neprilysin抑制剂,而矿皮质激素受体拮抗剂(MRAs)和钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白2 (SGLT2)抑制剂不包括在内。根据目前的心力衰竭指南,GDMT现在包括所有四种药物类别,包括mra和SGLT2抑制剂。因此,本研究中GDMT的定义与当代标准并不完全一致。该研究仅根据是否给予GDMT对患者进行分类,未考虑剂量优化。然而,将GDMT药物的滴度提高到目标或最大耐受剂量是有效治疗的关键组成部分。先前的研究表明,提高RASi、β受体阻滞剂和mra滴定的HFrEF患者的死亡率显著降低。虽然在本研究中处方率很高,但尚不清楚是否达到了适当的剂量递增。除了GDMT的观点,另一个有趣的发现是非持续性室速的高发生率,尽管相对年轻的队列。与先前的研究相比,这可能是由于潜在病因的差异。在老年人群中,瓣膜性心脏病和冠状动脉疾病更为普遍,而心肌病在该队列中可能被过度代表。因此,对这些患者的潜在心脏病理进行详细分析将是进一步解释的必要条件。作者没有什么可报告的。作者没有什么可报告的。作者没有什么可报告的。作者声明无利益冲突。该手稿不包括任何原始数据。
{"title":"Does Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy Reduce the Incidence of Ventricular Arrhythmias in Patients With HFrEF?","authors":"Yu Nomoto,&nbsp;Naoya Kataoka,&nbsp;Teruhiko Imamura","doi":"10.1002/joa3.70253","DOIUrl":"10.1002/joa3.70253","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In the present study, among 139 patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) who had a dual chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) or cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator (CRT-D), twelve patients (8.6%) experienced sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT). Of these, seven (58%) were non-compliant with heart failure guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) [<span>1</span>]. This finding suggests a strong correlation between poor adherence to GDMT and the occurrence of VT. Recent reports indicate that the proportion of sudden cardiac death among HFrEF patients has been decreasing, likely due to the advent of novel heart failure medications and the widespread implementation of GDMT [<span>2</span>]. From the perspective of GDMT, we believe several points in this study warrant further discussion.</p><p>GDMT was defined as the use of both beta-blockers and a renin–angiotensin system inhibitor (RASi)—including an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, an angiotensin receptor blocker, or an angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor—while mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) and sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors were not included. According to current heart failure guidelines, GDMT now encompasses all four drug classes, including MRAs and SGLT2 inhibitors. Therefore, the definition of GDMT in this study does not fully align with contemporary standards.</p><p>The study categorized patients simply based on whether GDMT was administered or not, without considering dose optimization. However, the up-titration of GDMT agents to target or maximally tolerated doses is a key component of effective therapy. Previous studies have shown that patients with HFrEF who achieved up-titration of RASi, beta-blockers, and MRAs had significantly lower mortality rates [<span>3</span>]. While the prescription rate was high in the present study, it remains unclear whether adequate dose escalation was achieved.</p><p>Beyond the GDMT perspective, another interesting finding is the high incidence of nonsustained VT, despite the relatively young cohort. Compared with prior studies, this may be due to differences in the underlying etiology. In older populations, valvular heart disease and coronary artery disease are more prevalent, whereas cardiomyopathies may have been overrepresented in this cohort. Therefore, a detailed analysis of the underlying cardiac pathology in these patients would be essential for further interpretation.</p><p>The authors have nothing to report.</p><p>The authors have nothing to report.</p><p>The authors have nothing to report.</p><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p><p>The manuscript does not include any original data.</p>","PeriodicalId":15174,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arrhythmia","volume":"41 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12686122/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145723593","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Beyond the Pulmonary Veins: The Influence of Pulsed Field Ablation on the Superior Vena Cava 肺静脉外:脉冲场消融对上腔静脉的影响。
IF 1.7 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2025-12-08 DOI: 10.1002/joa3.70249
Eiji Yoshida, Yusuke Sakamoto, Hiroyuki Osanai, Hiroshi Asano

Background

Pulsed field ablation (PFA) selectively ablates myocardial tissue while minimizing damage to surrounding structures. However, its effects on the superior vena cava (SVC) during right superior pulmonary vein (RSPV) isolation remain unclear.

Objective

This study aimed to assess the impact of PFA on the SVC and determine whether anatomical proximity contributes to conduction delay or isolation.

Methods

This prospective, single-center observational study analyzed 15 patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) who underwent PFA at our institution between December 2024 and February 2025. A 12-F multipolar PFA catheter (FARAWAVE) was used. The shortest RSPV-SVC distance was measured using preprocedural contrast-enhanced CT and intraprocedural electroanatomic mapping.

Results

Among the 15 patients, 10 (67%) exhibited PFA-induced conduction abnormalities in the SVC, including conduction delay or partial isolation. Partial SVC isolation was observed in seven patients (47%), with three (20%) developing SVC-originating AF that required additional SVC ablation. The shortest RSPV-SVC distance on CT was significantly shorter in the impact group (6.25 ± 1.7 mm) than in the nonimpact group (9.7 ± 2.0 mm; p = 0.04). Electroanatomic mapping showed no significant difference in the application-SVC distance between groups (p = 0.12). ROC analysis identified 7.15 mm as the cutoff for predicting SVC involvement (AUC = 0.86; 95% CI, 0.63–1.00).

Conclusion

PFA for RSPV isolation can cause SVC conduction abnormalities, with anatomical proximity as a key determinant. Preprocedural CT assessment may predict unintentional SVC involvement, which may alter arrhythmogenicity. Further studies are needed to assess long-term clinical implications.

背景:脉冲场消融(PFA)选择性消融心肌组织,同时尽量减少对周围结构的损伤。然而,在右上肺静脉(RSPV)分离过程中,其对上腔静脉(SVC)的影响尚不清楚。目的:本研究旨在评估PFA对SVC的影响,并确定解剖接近是否会导致传导延迟或隔离。方法:这项前瞻性、单中心观察性研究分析了2024年12月至2025年2月在我院接受PFA治疗的15例阵发性心房颤动(AF)患者。使用12-F多极PFA导管(farwave)。RSPV-SVC的最短距离通过术前增强CT和术中电解剖作图测量。结果:在15例患者中,10例(67%)表现出pfa诱导的SVC传导异常,包括传导延迟或部分分离。在7例(47%)患者中观察到部分SVC分离,其中3例(20%)发展为SVC源性房颤,需要额外的SVC消融。冲击组CT上RSPV-SVC最短距离(6.25±1.7 mm)明显短于非冲击组(9.7±2.0 mm, p = 0.04)。电解剖测图显示两组间应用- svc距离无显著差异(p = 0.12)。ROC分析确定7.15 mm为预测SVC受损伤的截止值(AUC = 0.86; 95% CI, 0.63-1.00)。结论:分离RSPV的PFA可引起SVC传导异常,解剖邻近性是关键决定因素。术前CT评估可以预测意外的SVC受损伤,这可能改变心律失常。需要进一步的研究来评估长期临床意义。
{"title":"Beyond the Pulmonary Veins: The Influence of Pulsed Field Ablation on the Superior Vena Cava","authors":"Eiji Yoshida,&nbsp;Yusuke Sakamoto,&nbsp;Hiroyuki Osanai,&nbsp;Hiroshi Asano","doi":"10.1002/joa3.70249","DOIUrl":"10.1002/joa3.70249","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Pulsed field ablation (PFA) selectively ablates myocardial tissue while minimizing damage to surrounding structures. However, its effects on the superior vena cava (SVC) during right superior pulmonary vein (RSPV) isolation remain unclear.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objective</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This study aimed to assess the impact of PFA on the SVC and determine whether anatomical proximity contributes to conduction delay or isolation.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This prospective, single-center observational study analyzed 15 patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) who underwent PFA at our institution between December 2024 and February 2025. A 12-F multipolar PFA catheter (FARAWAVE) was used. The shortest RSPV-SVC distance was measured using preprocedural contrast-enhanced CT and intraprocedural electroanatomic mapping.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Among the 15 patients, 10 (67%) exhibited PFA-induced conduction abnormalities in the SVC, including conduction delay or partial isolation. Partial SVC isolation was observed in seven patients (47%), with three (20%) developing SVC-originating AF that required additional SVC ablation. The shortest RSPV-SVC distance on CT was significantly shorter in the impact group (6.25 ± 1.7 mm) than in the nonimpact group (9.7 ± 2.0 mm; <i>p</i> = 0.04). Electroanatomic mapping showed no significant difference in the application-SVC distance between groups (<i>p</i> = 0.12). ROC analysis identified 7.15 mm as the cutoff for predicting SVC involvement (AUC = 0.86; 95% CI, 0.63–1.00).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>PFA for RSPV isolation can cause SVC conduction abnormalities, with anatomical proximity as a key determinant. Preprocedural CT assessment may predict unintentional SVC involvement, which may alter arrhythmogenicity. Further studies are needed to assess long-term clinical implications.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":15174,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arrhythmia","volume":"41 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12685757/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145723519","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Antithrombotic Management in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: An Updated Clinical Review 经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后房颤患者的抗血栓管理:最新的临床回顾
IF 1.7 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2025-12-06 DOI: 10.1002/joa3.70248
Yuichi Saito, Yoshio Kobayashi

Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) often develop acute coronary syndrome and undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and vice versa. Acute coronary syndrome and PCI mandate the use of dual antiplatelet therapy, while oral anticoagulation is recommended in patients with AF to mitigate thromboembolic risks. Clinical evidence concerning antithrombotic treatment in patients with either AF or PCI has been accumulated, but when combined, the therapeutic strategy becomes complex. Although triple therapy, a combination of oral anticoagulation with dual antiplatelet therapy, has been employed in patients with AF undergoing PCI as an initial antithrombotic strategy, less intensive regimens may be associated with a lower rate of bleeding without an increased risk of thrombotic events. This narrative review article summarizes currently available evidence of antithrombotic therapy in patients with AF undergoing PCI.

心房颤动(AF)患者常发展为急性冠状动脉综合征并接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI),反之亦然。急性冠脉综合征和PCI要求使用双重抗血小板治疗,而AF患者建议口服抗凝以减轻血栓栓塞风险。关于房颤或PCI患者抗血栓治疗的临床证据已经积累,但当合并时,治疗策略变得复杂。虽然三联治疗,即口服抗凝与双重抗血小板治疗的结合,已被用于房颤PCI患者作为初始抗血栓策略,但较低强度的方案可能与较低的出血率相关,而不会增加血栓事件的风险。这篇叙述性综述文章总结了目前房颤患者行PCI的抗血栓治疗的证据。
{"title":"Antithrombotic Management in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: An Updated Clinical Review","authors":"Yuichi Saito,&nbsp;Yoshio Kobayashi","doi":"10.1002/joa3.70248","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/joa3.70248","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) often develop acute coronary syndrome and undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and vice versa. Acute coronary syndrome and PCI mandate the use of dual antiplatelet therapy, while oral anticoagulation is recommended in patients with AF to mitigate thromboembolic risks. Clinical evidence concerning antithrombotic treatment in patients with either AF or PCI has been accumulated, but when combined, the therapeutic strategy becomes complex. Although triple therapy, a combination of oral anticoagulation with dual antiplatelet therapy, has been employed in patients with AF undergoing PCI as an initial antithrombotic strategy, less intensive regimens may be associated with a lower rate of bleeding without an increased risk of thrombotic events. This narrative review article summarizes currently available evidence of antithrombotic therapy in patients with AF undergoing PCI.</p>","PeriodicalId":15174,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arrhythmia","volume":"41 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/joa3.70248","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145695281","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Incidence and In-Hospital Outcomes of Bradycardia or Atrioventricular Conduction Disorder in Patients With Type 2 Myocardial Infarction: A Nationwide Inpatient Analysis 2型心肌梗死患者心动过缓或房室传导障碍的发生率和住院结果:一项全国住院患者分析
IF 1.7 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2025-12-06 DOI: 10.1002/joa3.70243
Chanokporn Puchongmart, Koravich Lorlowhakarn, Dina Soliman, Pojsakorn Danpanichkul, Nattanicha Chaisrimaneepan, Natnicha Leelaviwat, Deephak Swaminath, Ben Thiravetyan

Background

Type 2 myocardial infarction (T2MI), caused by an imbalance between oxygen supply and demand without significant coronary obstruction, is increasingly recognized yet remains underexplored, particularly regarding conduction abnormalities.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the National Inpatient Sample from 2017 to 2022. Adult patients hospitalized with T2MI were identified by ICD-10-CM code. Bradycardia or atrioventricular (AV) conduction delay was defined using diagnostic codes for bradycardia and all degrees of AV block. We compared baseline characteristics, comorbidities, and causes of T2MI, and used multivariable logistic regression to evaluate associations with in-hospital mortality and cardiogenic shock.

Results

Among 1 960 410 patients with T2MI, 118 025 (6.0%) had bradycardia or AV conduction delay. These patients were older, more often male, and had higher rates of hypertension, heart failure, chronic kidney disease, and diabetes. The pacemaker implantation was significantly more prevalent (8.7% vs. 0.3%, p < 0.01). They also showed an increase in in-hospital mortality (10.4% vs. 9.8%, p < 0.01), cardiogenic shock (5.1% vs. 3.2%, p < 0.01), and AKI (47.9% vs. 46.3%, p < 0.01). After adjustment, conduction disorders remained associated with higher odds of mortality (aOR 1.09, 95% CI 1.04–1.14) and cardiogenic shock (aOR 1.71, 95% CI 1.61–1.83).

Conclusions

Bradycardia or AV conduction delay occurred in 6% of T2MI hospitalizations and was independently linked to worse in-hospital outcomes, underscoring the need for close monitoring in this population.

背景2型心肌梗死(T2MI)是由氧供需不平衡引起的,无明显的冠状动脉阻塞,越来越多的人认识到这一点,但仍未得到充分的研究,特别是在传导异常方面。方法采用2017 - 2022年全国住院患者样本进行回顾性队列研究。成年T2MI住院患者采用ICD-10-CM编码进行识别。心动过缓或房室传导延迟被定义为心动过缓和所有程度的房室传导阻滞的诊断代码。我们比较了T2MI的基线特征、合并症和病因,并使用多变量logistic回归来评估其与院内死亡率和心源性休克的关系。结果1 960410例T2MI患者中,118025例(6.0%)出现心动过缓或房室传导延迟。这些患者年龄较大,多为男性,高血压、心力衰竭、慢性肾病和糖尿病的发病率较高。起搏器植入术更为普遍(8.7% vs. 0.3%, p < 0.01)。他们还显示住院死亡率(10.4% vs. 9.8%, p < 0.01)、心源性休克(5.1% vs. 3.2%, p < 0.01)和AKI (47.9% vs. 46.3%, p < 0.01)增加。调整后,传导障碍仍与较高的死亡率(aOR 1.09, 95% CI 1.04-1.14)和心源性休克(aOR 1.71, 95% CI 1.61-1.83)相关。结论:6%的T2MI住院患者发生心动过缓或房室传导延迟,并与较差的住院结果独立相关,强调了对该人群进行密切监测的必要性。
{"title":"Incidence and In-Hospital Outcomes of Bradycardia or Atrioventricular Conduction Disorder in Patients With Type 2 Myocardial Infarction: A Nationwide Inpatient Analysis","authors":"Chanokporn Puchongmart,&nbsp;Koravich Lorlowhakarn,&nbsp;Dina Soliman,&nbsp;Pojsakorn Danpanichkul,&nbsp;Nattanicha Chaisrimaneepan,&nbsp;Natnicha Leelaviwat,&nbsp;Deephak Swaminath,&nbsp;Ben Thiravetyan","doi":"10.1002/joa3.70243","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/joa3.70243","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Type 2 myocardial infarction (T2MI), caused by an imbalance between oxygen supply and demand without significant coronary obstruction, is increasingly recognized yet remains underexplored, particularly regarding conduction abnormalities.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the National Inpatient Sample from 2017 to 2022. Adult patients hospitalized with T2MI were identified by ICD-10-CM code. Bradycardia or atrioventricular (AV) conduction delay was defined using diagnostic codes for bradycardia and all degrees of AV block. We compared baseline characteristics, comorbidities, and causes of T2MI, and used multivariable logistic regression to evaluate associations with in-hospital mortality and cardiogenic shock.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Among 1 960 410 patients with T2MI, 118 025 (6.0%) had bradycardia or AV conduction delay. These patients were older, more often male, and had higher rates of hypertension, heart failure, chronic kidney disease, and diabetes. The pacemaker implantation was significantly more prevalent (8.7% vs. 0.3%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01). They also showed an increase in in-hospital mortality (10.4% vs. 9.8%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01), cardiogenic shock (5.1% vs. 3.2%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01), and AKI (47.9% vs. 46.3%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01). After adjustment, conduction disorders remained associated with higher odds of mortality (aOR 1.09, 95% CI 1.04–1.14) and cardiogenic shock (aOR 1.71, 95% CI 1.61–1.83).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Bradycardia or AV conduction delay occurred in 6% of T2MI hospitalizations and was independently linked to worse in-hospital outcomes, underscoring the need for close monitoring in this population.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":15174,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arrhythmia","volume":"41 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/joa3.70243","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145695280","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Safety and Clinical Outcomes of Transvenous Lead Extraction for Cardiac Device Infections in the Very Elderly 经静脉拔铅治疗高龄心脏装置感染的安全性和临床效果
IF 1.7 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2025-12-06 DOI: 10.1002/joa3.70245
Khalid Sawalha, John P. Marenco, Laurence M. Epstein, Shayal Pundlik, Kyle Gobeil, Marshal Fox, Fadi Chalhoub

Background

The increasing use of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) has led to a rise in transvenous lead extractions (TLE), particularly for device-related infections. The elderly represent a growing subgroup undergoing TLE, but data on their outcomes are limited.

Objectives

To evaluate the safety and in-hospital outcomes of TLE in patients aged ≥ 80 years with device-related infections.

Methods

We analyzed the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 2016 to 2020 to identify hospitalizations involving TLE for device-related infections. Patients were stratified by age: < 80 years and ≥ 80 years. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included major procedural complications and length of stay. Multivariate logistic regression identified independent predictors of in-hospital mortality and complications.

Results

Among 30 670 patients who underwent TLE, 6530 (21.3%) were aged ≥ 80 years. In-hospital mortality did not differ significantly between groups (4.0% vs. 4.6%, p = 0.40), nor did overall complication rates (6.7% vs. 6.9%, p = 0.81). However, elderly patients had higher rates of post-procedural stroke (0.3% vs. 0.02%, p = 0.002) and bleeding (1.6% vs. 0.8%, p = 0.04). Independent predictors of mortality included chronic kidney disease (aOR 2.2, 95% CI: 1.2–4.2), cirrhosis (aOR 12.2, 95% CI: 1.1–133), and respiratory failure (aOR 50.7, 95% CI: 6–425). Elderly patients were more frequently discharged to rehabilitation facilities (40.3% vs. 25.5%, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Elderly patients undergoing TLE for infections had similar in-hospital mortality and complication rates compared to younger patients. Age alone should not preclude TLE. However, increased risks of stroke and bleeding warrant targeted perioperative assessment. Further studies are needed to assess long-term outcomes in this population.

背景:心脏植入式电子装置(CIEDs)的使用越来越多,导致经静脉铅拔出(TLE)的增加,特别是与装置相关的感染。老年人代表了一个越来越多的接受TLE的亚群,但他们的结果数据有限。目的评价TLE治疗≥80岁器械相关感染患者的安全性和住院结果。方法分析2016年至2020年全国住院患者样本(NIS),以确定因器械相关感染而涉及TLE的住院情况。患者按年龄分层:80岁和≥80岁。主要终点是住院死亡率。次要结果包括主要手术并发症和住院时间。多因素logistic回归确定了院内死亡率和并发症的独立预测因素。结果30670例TLE患者中,年龄≥80岁的6530例(21.3%)。两组间住院死亡率无显著差异(4.0%对4.6%,p = 0.40),总并发症发生率也无显著差异(6.7%对6.9%,p = 0.81)。然而,老年患者的术后卒中发生率(0.3%比0.02%,p = 0.002)和出血发生率(1.6%比0.8%,p = 0.04)较高。死亡率的独立预测因素包括慢性肾病(aOR为2.2,95% CI为1.2-4.2)、肝硬化(aOR为12.2,95% CI为1.1-133)和呼吸衰竭(aOR为50.7,95% CI为6-425)。老年患者出院到康复机构的频率更高(40.3%比25.5%,p < 0.001)。结论老年患者接受TLE感染的住院死亡率和并发症发生率与年轻患者相似。年龄本身不应排除肺结核。然而,卒中和出血风险的增加需要有针对性的围手术期评估。需要进一步的研究来评估这一人群的长期结果。
{"title":"Safety and Clinical Outcomes of Transvenous Lead Extraction for Cardiac Device Infections in the Very Elderly","authors":"Khalid Sawalha,&nbsp;John P. Marenco,&nbsp;Laurence M. Epstein,&nbsp;Shayal Pundlik,&nbsp;Kyle Gobeil,&nbsp;Marshal Fox,&nbsp;Fadi Chalhoub","doi":"10.1002/joa3.70245","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/joa3.70245","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The increasing use of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) has led to a rise in transvenous lead extractions (TLE), particularly for device-related infections. The elderly represent a growing subgroup undergoing TLE, but data on their outcomes are limited.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objectives</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>To evaluate the safety and in-hospital outcomes of TLE in patients aged ≥ 80 years with device-related infections.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We analyzed the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 2016 to 2020 to identify hospitalizations involving TLE for device-related infections. Patients were stratified by age: &lt; 80 years and ≥ 80 years. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included major procedural complications and length of stay. Multivariate logistic regression identified independent predictors of in-hospital mortality and complications.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Among 30 670 patients who underwent TLE, 6530 (21.3%) were aged ≥ 80 years. In-hospital mortality did not differ significantly between groups (4.0% vs. 4.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.40), nor did overall complication rates (6.7% vs. 6.9%, <i>p</i> = 0.81). However, elderly patients had higher rates of post-procedural stroke (0.3% vs. 0.02%, <i>p</i> = 0.002) and bleeding (1.6% vs. 0.8%, <i>p</i> = 0.04). Independent predictors of mortality included chronic kidney disease (aOR 2.2, 95% CI: 1.2–4.2), cirrhosis (aOR 12.2, 95% CI: 1.1–133), and respiratory failure (aOR 50.7, 95% CI: 6–425). Elderly patients were more frequently discharged to rehabilitation facilities (40.3% vs. 25.5%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Elderly patients undergoing TLE for infections had similar in-hospital mortality and complication rates compared to younger patients. Age alone should not preclude TLE. However, increased risks of stroke and bleeding warrant targeted perioperative assessment. Further studies are needed to assess long-term outcomes in this population.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":15174,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arrhythmia","volume":"41 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/joa3.70245","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145695279","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Arrhythmia
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1