Device implantation with a generator pocket raises cosmetic concerns regarding external appearance. We present a case of successful left bundle branch area pacing and left axillary pacemaker generator implantation via a two-incision approach in a young female patient, resulting in favorable cardiac function and cosmetic satisfaction.
Atrial high-rate episodes (AHRE) detected by cardiac implanted electronic devices are known markers for adverse cardiac events. Previous studies have shown that the incidence of new-onset AHREs in patients with right ventricular pacing reaches 50%. At the same time, His bundle pacing (HBP) and left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) were associated with significantly fewer AHRE. This study aimed to compare the incidence of new-onset AHRE between HBP and LBBAP in patients with atrioventricular block and no history of atrial fibrillation.
One hundred and forty-two patients, fifty-nine with HBP and eighty-three with LBBAP for advanced atrioventricular block, were prospectively followed for new-onset AHRE.
The mean follow-up period was 624 ± 148.6 days for the HBP patients and 663.4 ± 157.4 days for the LBBAP patients. New-onset AHRE was encountered in 8 of 59 patients (13.5%) with HBP and 14 of 83 (16.8%) with LBBAP (hazard ratio—0.91, log rank p = .84). In the multivariate Cox regression model, HBP and LBBAP had similar predictive values, while only age and diabetes mellitus were significantly associated with new-onset AHRE occurrence.
HBP and LBBAP were associated with a similar incidence of device-detected new-onset AHRE during a medium-term follow-up period in patients with atrioventricular block and no history of atrial fibrillation.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) poses significant risks of heart failure and stroke, emphasizing effective treatment. Catheter ablation using thermal energy sources, such as radiofrequency or cryoballoon ablation, has shown greater success in maintaining sinus rhythm compared with drug therapy. However, thermal ablation (TA) is associated with serious complications, such as atrial-esophageal fistula, phrenic nerve palsy, and pulmonary vein stenosis. Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) is an emerging ablation energy source that uses electroporation to selectively target cardiac tissue while sparing adjacent structures such as nerves and blood vessels. Two randomized controlled trials have demonstrated that PFA is comparable to TA in both efficacy and safety at a 1-year follow-up and had shorter procedure times. A review of six meta-analyses consistently showed shorter procedural times for PFA across all studies. Additionally, three out of the four recent studies with large samples reported lower recurrence rates with PFA. Regarding complication rates, four out of four studies showed lower incidences of phrenic nerve injury with PFA, and two out of three studies reported lower rates of esophageal injury with PFA. However, four out of four studies indicated higher incidences of cardiac tamponade with PFA, highlighting the need for caution among early-career operators. Furthermore, careful monitoring is required considering the possible unforeseen complications specific to PFA and the lack of long-term follow-up data. Despite these concerns, PFA shows promise as a safer, more effective, and efficient alternative to TA for AF, particularly as operator experience and device technology continue to advance.
Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is widely performed in routine clinical practice. Achieving LBBAP requires deep insertion of the lead into the interventricular septum. LBBAP may be challenging in patients with a history of open-heart surgery (OHS) because of myocardial fibrosis associated with surgical trauma. This study aimed to report the feasibility and safety of performing LBBAP in patients with a history of OHS.
This retrospective analysis included patients who underwent successful LBBAP between November 2020 and September 2024, with approval from our institutional review board. LBBAP was performed using a 3830 SelectSecure lead, and pacing parameters were assessed before and after implantation.
One hundred patients were analyzed, including 26 in the OHS group and 74 in the non-OHS group. The success rates of LBBAP were 84.6% in the OHS group and 90.5% in the non-OHS group (p = 0.375). Notably, the number of LBBAP lead placements was higher in the OHS group (3.0 ± 2.1 vs. 2.0 ± 1.4, p = 0.017). The left ventricular activation time in lead V6 was comparable between the groups at implantation (73.6 ± 13.3 ms vs. 75.6 ± 12.1 ms, p = 0.522). The QRS duration was significantly wider in the OHS group at implantation (131.3 ± 14.6 vs. 121.1 ± 12.3 ms, p = 0.002), but parameters remained stable at 1 year.
LBBAP in patients with a history of OHS may present a slightly higher level of technical difficulty, but it is both feasible and safe.
The complex signal identification function of CARTO version 8 enables quantitative evaluation of local potential fractionation. We present a case where this advanced technology successfully identified non-pulmonary vein foci associated with fractionated potentials during sinus rhythm.
Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is effective in treating atrial fibrillation (AF), but outcomes are worse for persistent AF (persAF) patients than paroxysmal AF (PAF) patients. The study aimed to identify differences in left atrial (LA) and left atrial appendage (LAA) anatomy in different AF types.
In a single-center observational study, a blinded retrospective analysis of preprocedural cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) images was performed. The study evaluated the dimensions of the LA and pulmonary veins (PV), as well as the size and morphology of the LAA using a 3D electroanatomical mapping system.
Between 2012 and 2016, a total of 1103 patients underwent second-generation cryoballoon PVI. Of these, 725 patients (65.7%) had CCTA available, and 473 of these (65.2%) had sufficient quality for measurements. The mean age of the patients was 66.3 ± 9.5 years, and PAF was present in 277 (58.6%) participants. The study found that in persAF patients, LA dimensions such as LA volume [mL] (108; 125; p < .001) or PV ostial dimensions were significantly larger than in those with PAF. LAA volume [mL] (8.3; 9.2; p = .005) and LAA ostial area [mm2] (325; 353; p = .01) were enlarged in persAF. There were no significant differences regarding LAA morphology, with the overall distribution being “windsock” (51%), “chicken-wing” (20%), “cauliflower” (15%), and “cactus” (13%).
Compared to PAF, persAF patients had significantly larger LA as well as LAA dimensions. LAA morphological types were distributed equally in both groups suggesting that LAA morphology may not be associated with the underlying AF type.
Successful isolation of the superior vena cava (SVC) using a functional conduction block between the right atrium (RA) and SVC has been documented. However, a comparison of this approach with the conventional method (CM) of circumferential ablation of the RA-SVC junction, based on angiography, remains unexplored.
In this study, we employed the innovative omnipolar mapping technology (OT) to discern the RA-SVC connection and compared clinical outcomes with those from CM.
Sixty-two patients undergoing SVC isolation were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the OT or CM group. No significant differences in the baseline characteristics were observed between the two groups. We assessed the efficacy and safety of both groups.
Both groups showed comparable acute success rates (96%) in SVC isolation, but the procedure in the OT group required fewer radiofrequency (RF) applications (13.6 ± 6.0 vs. 19.8 ± 10.9, p = .046) and shorter procedure time (9.6 ± 6.8 min vs. 14.3 ± 6.8 min, p = .007). The overall absorbed dose was notably lower in the OT group (69.6 ± 47.6 mGy vs. 90.3 ± 30.3 mGy, p = .023).
The OT enhances the efficacy of SVC isolation, requiring fewer RF applications and reducing procedure time compared to conventional treatment methods.