In machine learning, ensemble learning methods (ELM) consist of combining several machine learning algorithms to obtain better quality predictions compared to a single model. The basic idea of this theory is to learn a set of classifiers and allow them to vote. In this paper, to correctly apply the ELM for enhancing of an artificial neural network (ANN) performances, a strategy was devised which is to divide the data to be classified into two categories, ‘easy-to-classify’ category and ‘difficult-to-classify’ category using a main ANN. Hence, reliable ANN and unreliable ANN are created and applied for the classification of ‘easy-to-classify’ data and for the classification of ‘difficult-to-classify’ data, respectively. The AdaBoost algorithm and Bagging algorithm are implemented separately on the unreliable ANN. To increase performance, the AdaBoost results and Bagging results are merged. The developed scheme is applied to remote sensing images from Meteosat Second Generation (MSG). The final results show very interesting performances in the case of the fusion of the results from AdaBoost-ANN and the results from Bagging-ANN (Ada/Bag-ANN). Indeed, the POD, FAR, CSI and Bias pass from 87.2%, 17.4%, 80.8% and 1.3 (ANN) to 96.8%, 06.8%, 92.7% and 1.1 (Ada/Bag-ANN), respectively. The same trend was observed in the case of precipitation estimates. The estimates obtained from the developed model (Ada/Bag-ANN) largely surpass those obtained from the use of ANN without ELM. Compared to ECST (Enhanced Convective Stratiform Technique), EPSAT-SG (Second Generation Satellite Precipitation Estimation), TAMSAT (Tropical Applications of Meteorology using SATellite), and RFE-2.0 (Rain Fall Estimate) which showed correlation coefficients of 87%, 81%, 76% and 71%, respectively, the Ada/Bag-ANN method shows significantly better results with a correlation coefficient of 94%.
在机器学习中,集合学习方法(ELM)包括将几种机器学习算法结合起来,以获得比单一模型更好的预测质量。这一理论的基本思想是学习一组分类器,并让它们进行投票。在本文中,为了正确应用 ELM 来提高人工神经网络(ANN)的性能,我们设计了一种策略,即使用一个主要的人工神经网络将待分类数据分为两类:"易分类 "类别和 "难分类 "类别。因此,创建了可靠 ANN 和不可靠 ANN,并分别用于 "易分类 "数据的分类和 "难分类 "数据的分类。AdaBoost 算法和 Bagging 算法分别在不可靠 ANN 上实现。为了提高性能,AdaBoost 算法的结果和 Bagging 算法的结果进行了合并。所开发的方案适用于第二代气象卫星(MSG)的遥感图像。最终结果表明,AdaBoost-ANN 的结果与 Bagging-ANN 的结果(Ada/Bag-ANN)的融合效果非常好。事实上,POD、FAR、CSI 和 Bias 分别从 87.2%、17.4%、80.8% 和 1.3(ANN)上升到 96.8%、06.8%、92.7% 和 1.1(Ada/Bag-ANN)。降水量估算也呈现出同样的趋势。从开发的模型(Ada/Bag-ANN)中获得的估计值大大超过了不使用 ELM 的 ANN 所获得的估计值。与 ECST(增强对流层状技术)、EPSAT-SG(第二代卫星降水估算)、TAMSAT(利用卫星的热带气象学应用)和 RFE-2.0(降雨估算)的相关系数分别为 87%、81%、76% 和 71%相比,Ada/Bag-ANN 方法的相关系数高达 94%,显示出明显更好的结果。
{"title":"Enhancement of ANN performance for remote sensing rainfall estimate in northern Algeria using ensemble learning methods","authors":"Youcef Attaf, Mourad Lazri, Karim Labadi, Yacine Mohia, Fethi Ouallouche, Rafik Absi","doi":"10.1007/s12040-024-02303-5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-024-02303-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In machine learning, ensemble learning methods (ELM) consist of combining several machine learning algorithms to obtain better quality predictions compared to a single model. The basic idea of this theory is to learn a set of classifiers and allow them to vote. In this paper, to correctly apply the ELM for enhancing of an artificial neural network (ANN) performances, a strategy was devised which is to divide the data to be classified into two categories, ‘easy-to-classify’ category and ‘difficult-to-classify’ category using a main ANN. Hence, reliable ANN and unreliable ANN are created and applied for the classification of ‘easy-to-classify’ data and for the classification of ‘difficult-to-classify’ data, respectively. The AdaBoost algorithm and Bagging algorithm are implemented separately on the unreliable ANN. To increase performance, the AdaBoost results and Bagging results are merged. The developed scheme is applied to remote sensing images from Meteosat Second Generation (MSG). The final results show very interesting performances in the case of the fusion of the results from AdaBoost-ANN and the results from Bagging-ANN (Ada/Bag-ANN). Indeed, the POD, FAR, CSI and Bias pass from 87.2%, 17.4%, 80.8% and 1.3 (ANN) to 96.8%, 06.8%, 92.7% and 1.1 (Ada/Bag-ANN), respectively. The same trend was observed in the case of precipitation estimates. The estimates obtained from the developed model (Ada/Bag-ANN) largely surpass those obtained from the use of ANN without ELM. Compared to ECST (Enhanced Convective Stratiform Technique), EPSAT-SG (Second Generation Satellite Precipitation Estimation), TAMSAT (Tropical Applications of Meteorology using SATellite), and RFE-2.0 (Rain Fall Estimate) which showed correlation coefficients of 87%, 81%, 76% and 71%, respectively, the Ada/Bag-ANN method shows significantly better results with a correlation coefficient of 94%.</p>","PeriodicalId":15609,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Earth System Science","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140942055","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-05-13DOI: 10.1007/s12040-024-02300-8
Sujit K Pradhan, Jitendra K Dash, S Balakrishnan, R Bhutani
Abstract
We report new Sm–Nd whole rock-mineral isochron ages of 2514 ± 13 Ma (MSWD = 0.79) and 2651 ± 95 Ma (MSWD = 7.4) from two east coast dykes (ECD) of Southern Granulite Terrain (SGT), India. The ages from the representative mafic dyke samples correspond to the time of intrusion of ECD into the eastern part of SGT, indicating the presence of an older Archean crust in SGT near the Pondicherry coast. The Sm–Nd ages obtained from the present study, along with geochronological information from Singhbhum Craton, suggest a magmatic linkage between SGT (including southern Dharwar Craton) and Singhbhum Craton during the Neoarchean period. The older ages obtained from the mafic dykes of the present study are comparable with the Sm–Nd ages of older mafic dykes from Nuggihalli green stone belt of Western Dharwar Craton (WDC), Pb–Pb ages of mafic dykes from Singhbhum Craton of India and the U–Pb ages from Pilbara and Kaapvaal cartons. These comparisons unlock a clue to Neoarchean (2.8–2.5 Ga) paleogeographic reconstructions of Pilbara, Kaapvaal, Singhbhum cratons, northern SGT (including southern Dharwar Craton) and also provide an opportunity for wide windows of research to be undertaken considering the dykes from SGT.