{"title":"Nutrition in HCC: A Call for Precision-Based Interventions and Real-World Integration.","authors":"WenQiang Xie, Haiou Li","doi":"10.1111/jgh.70290","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.70290","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15877,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2026-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146125337","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Comment on \"Role of ALBI Grade as a Predictive Factor for Long-Term Mortality in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) Undergoing Trans-Arterial Chemoembolization (TACE)\".","authors":"Nisar Ahmed, Areej Riaz, Bisma Bashir Ahmed, Ramin Noorzai","doi":"10.1111/jgh.70243","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.70243","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15877,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2026-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146119121","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains one of the most prevalent and lethal malignancies worldwide, characterized by late diagnosis, limited therapeutic options, and poor prognosis. Conventional systemic therapies such as sorafenib and its successors provide only modest survival benefits and are frequently complicated by toxicity and drug resistance. In recent years, immunotherapy has emerged as a promising avenue, yet its efficacy is often restricted by the profoundly immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME). Within this landscape, exosomes-nanoscale extracellular vesicles secreted by tumor, stromal, and immune cells-have gained increasing attention for their central role in intercellular communication. They influence immune modulation, metabolic reprogramming, and therapeutic resistance, while also serving as potential biomarkers, nanocarriers, and vaccine platforms. Tumor-derived exosomes (TEXs) contribute to immune evasion by suppressing CD8+ T cells, polarizing macrophages toward protumoral phenotypes, and enhancing immune checkpoint resistance. Conversely, engineered exosomes demonstrate significant therapeutic potential by reprogramming TAMs, improving drug delivery, and acting as cancer vaccines. Despite these advances, challenges remain in exosome biogenesis, heterogeneity, large-scale production, and off-target effects, which hinder clinical translation. Furthermore, interactions between exosomes and gut microbiota in modulating hepatic immunity represent an emerging frontier with unexplored therapeutic implications. Continued advances in bioengineering, nanotechnology, and systems biology are expected to refine exosome-based therapies, offering novel, personalized strategies to improve outcomes for HCC patients.
{"title":"Exosome-Based Strategies in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Mechanisms, Immunotherapy, and Clinical Challenges.","authors":"Husni Farah, Munthar Kadhim-Abosaoda, Hayjaa Mohaisen-Mousa, Renuka Jyothi, Priya Priyadarshini-Nayak, Bethanney Janney-J, Gurjant Singh, Ashish Singh-Chauhan, Manoj Kumar-Mishra","doi":"10.1111/jgh.70245","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.70245","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains one of the most prevalent and lethal malignancies worldwide, characterized by late diagnosis, limited therapeutic options, and poor prognosis. Conventional systemic therapies such as sorafenib and its successors provide only modest survival benefits and are frequently complicated by toxicity and drug resistance. In recent years, immunotherapy has emerged as a promising avenue, yet its efficacy is often restricted by the profoundly immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME). Within this landscape, exosomes-nanoscale extracellular vesicles secreted by tumor, stromal, and immune cells-have gained increasing attention for their central role in intercellular communication. They influence immune modulation, metabolic reprogramming, and therapeutic resistance, while also serving as potential biomarkers, nanocarriers, and vaccine platforms. Tumor-derived exosomes (TEXs) contribute to immune evasion by suppressing CD8<sup>+</sup> T cells, polarizing macrophages toward protumoral phenotypes, and enhancing immune checkpoint resistance. Conversely, engineered exosomes demonstrate significant therapeutic potential by reprogramming TAMs, improving drug delivery, and acting as cancer vaccines. Despite these advances, challenges remain in exosome biogenesis, heterogeneity, large-scale production, and off-target effects, which hinder clinical translation. Furthermore, interactions between exosomes and gut microbiota in modulating hepatic immunity represent an emerging frontier with unexplored therapeutic implications. Continued advances in bioengineering, nanotechnology, and systems biology are expected to refine exosome-based therapies, offering novel, personalized strategies to improve outcomes for HCC patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":15877,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2026-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146105888","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Ho Seung Lee, Gunn Huh, Yoonchan Lee, Sung Hyun Cho, Jae Min Lee, Tae Jun Song, Dong-Wan Seo, Dongwook Oh
Background and aim: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided drainage is widely used for postoperative pancreatic fluid collections (PO-PFCs). However, concerns regarding adverse events persist. We aimed to assess clinical outcomes and identify risk factors for adverse events following endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of postoperative pancreatic fluid collections after distal pancreatectomy.
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 124 patients who underwent EUS-guided drainage for PO-PFCs following distal pancreatectomy. The clinical and procedural data were also evaluated. Risk factors for adverse events and post-procedural bleeding were identified using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Subgroup analyses were performed before and after the introduction of the electrocautery-enhanced lumen-apposing metal stent (EC-LAMS).
Results: Technical and clinical success rates were 100% and 92.7%, respectively. Adverse events occurred in 25.8% (32/124) of patients. Moderate-to-severe bleeding occurred in 11 patients, of whom 10 required embolization or emergency surgery. Paracolic gutter extension was an independent risk factor for adverse events. Factors associated with post-procedural bleeding included paracolic extension, longer procedure time, antiplatelet or anticoagulant use, and the combined use of electrocautery and mechanical dilators. In the subgroup analysis before and after EC-LAMS introduction, adverse events were less frequent (31.9% vs. 18.2%), but the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.10).
Conclusions: EUS-guided drainage of PO-PFCs is effective but carries the risk of adverse events. Ongoing refinements in the technique and device design appear to have improved safety over time. Careful case selection and early recognition of adverse events are essential for optimizing patient outcomes.
{"title":"Clinical Outcomes and Risk Factors for Adverse Events Associated With Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Drainage of Postoperative Pancreatic Fluid Collections Following Distal Pancreatectomy.","authors":"Ho Seung Lee, Gunn Huh, Yoonchan Lee, Sung Hyun Cho, Jae Min Lee, Tae Jun Song, Dong-Wan Seo, Dongwook Oh","doi":"10.1111/jgh.70267","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.70267","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided drainage is widely used for postoperative pancreatic fluid collections (PO-PFCs). However, concerns regarding adverse events persist. We aimed to assess clinical outcomes and identify risk factors for adverse events following endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of postoperative pancreatic fluid collections after distal pancreatectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 124 patients who underwent EUS-guided drainage for PO-PFCs following distal pancreatectomy. The clinical and procedural data were also evaluated. Risk factors for adverse events and post-procedural bleeding were identified using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Subgroup analyses were performed before and after the introduction of the electrocautery-enhanced lumen-apposing metal stent (EC-LAMS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Technical and clinical success rates were 100% and 92.7%, respectively. Adverse events occurred in 25.8% (32/124) of patients. Moderate-to-severe bleeding occurred in 11 patients, of whom 10 required embolization or emergency surgery. Paracolic gutter extension was an independent risk factor for adverse events. Factors associated with post-procedural bleeding included paracolic extension, longer procedure time, antiplatelet or anticoagulant use, and the combined use of electrocautery and mechanical dilators. In the subgroup analysis before and after EC-LAMS introduction, adverse events were less frequent (31.9% vs. 18.2%), but the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.10).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EUS-guided drainage of PO-PFCs is effective but carries the risk of adverse events. Ongoing refinements in the technique and device design appear to have improved safety over time. Careful case selection and early recognition of adverse events are essential for optimizing patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":15877,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2026-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146105748","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
<p>Ashley Anderson<sup>1</sup>, Chris Cederwall<sup>1</sup></p><p><sup>1</sup><i>Te Whatu Ora, Wellington, New Zealand</i></p><p>James Kang<sup>1</sup>, Robert Hackett<sup>1</sup></p><p><sup>1</sup><i>Health New Zealand Capital and Coast, Wellington, New Zealand</i></p><p>Catherine Jackson<sup>1</sup>, Karen Bartholomew<sup>1</sup>, Nina Bevin<sup>1</sup>, Rawiri McKree Jansen<sup>2</sup>, Joanne Hikaka<sup>3</sup>, Colin Mexted<sup>4</sup>, Helen Liley<sup>1</sup>, Lesley Overend<sup>5</sup>, Matt Blakiston<sup>5</sup>, Angela Fraser<sup>1</sup>, Sarah Hartnall<sup>1</sup>, Jean Wignall<sup>1</sup>, Malcolm Fletcher<sup>1</sup>, Jaylane Karanui<sup>1</sup>, Ed Gane<sup>6</sup></p><p><sup>1</sup><i>Planning, Funding and Outcomes, Health New Zealand, Waitemata, New Zealand; <sup>2</sup>Te Aka Whai Ora, Wellington, New Zealand; <sup>3</sup>Te Kupenga Hauora Māori, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand; <sup>4</sup>Aotearoa Drug Information Outreach Trust, Auckland, New Zealand; <sup>5</sup>Awanui Labs, Auckland, New Zealand; <sup>6</sup>Te Toka Tumai, Health New Zealand, Auckland, New Zealand</i></p><p>Andrew Thushyanthan<sup>1</sup>, Ravinder Ogra</p><p><sup>1</sup><i>Te Whatu Ora NZ, Auckland, New Zealand</i></p><p>Olivia Burn<sup>1,2,3,4</sup>, Marina Barcena-Varela<sup>2,3,4</sup>, Jordan Minnell<sup>1</sup>, Sarah Draper<sup>5</sup>, Gavin Painter<sup>5</sup>, Amaia Lujambio<sup>2,3,4</sup>, Ian Hermans<sup>16</sup></p><p><sup>1</sup><i>Malaghan Institute of Medical Research, Wellington, New Zealand; <sup>2</sup>The Precision Immunology Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA; <sup>3</sup>Department of Oncological Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA; <sup>4</sup>Liver Cancer Program, Division of Liver Diseases, Department of Medicine, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA; <sup>5</sup>Ferrier Research Institute, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand; <sup>6</sup>Maurice Wilkins Centre for Molecular Biodiscovery, Auckland, New Zealand</i></p><p>India Fitt, Mikaela Law<sup>1,2</sup>, Gen Johnston<sup>1</sup>, Charlotte Daker<sup>2,3</sup>, Sam Simmonds<sup>2</sup>, Chris Varghese<sup>1</sup>, Armen Gharibans<sup>1,2</sup>, Christopher N. Andrews<sup>2,4</sup>, Greg O'Grady<sup>1,2</sup>, Stefan Calder<sup>1,2</sup></p><p><sup>1</sup><i>The University of Auckland, Auckland; <sup>2</sup>Alimetry Ltd., Auckland, New Zealand; <sup>3</sup>Te Whatu Ora, Waitemata, New Zealand; <sup>4</sup>University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada</i></p><p>Stephanie Brown, Stephanie Landorf<sup>2</sup>, Anna Richards<sup>3</sup>, Stephanie Fireman<sup>3,1</sup></p><p><sup>1</sup><i>Otago University Christchurch, Christchurch, New Zealand; <sup>2</sup>Women's and Children's Hospital Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia; <sup>3</sup>Tiny Giants Gastroenterology, Auckland, New Zealand; <sup>4</sup>Tiny Giants Gastroenterolog
Ashley Anderson1, Chris cederwall11 the Whatu Ora,惠灵顿,新西兰;james Kang1, Robert hackett 11新西兰首都和海岸卫生部,惠灵顿,新西兰;catherine Jackson1, Karen bartholome1, Nina Bevin1, Rawiri McKree Jansen2, Joanne hikak3, Colin Mexted4, Helen Liley1, Lesley Overend5, Matt Blakiston5, Angela Fraser1, Sarah Hartnall1, Jean Wignall1, Malcolm Fletcher1, Jaylane karanu1, Ed gane61新西兰卫生部,Waitemata;2 . the Aka Whai Ora,惠灵顿,新西兰;3 . The Kupenga Hauora Māori,奥克兰大学,奥克兰,新西兰;4新西兰奥克兰aotearoa药物信息推广信托基金;5Awanui实验室,奥克兰,新西兰;6 the Toka Tumai,新西兰卫生部,奥克兰,新西兰andrew Thushyanthan1, Ravinder ogra1 the Whatu Ora NZ,奥克兰,新西兰olivia bur1,2,3,4, Marina barcena - varela2,3,4, Jordan Minnell1, Sarah Draper5, Gavin Painter5, Amaia lujambio2,3,4, Ian hermans 161马拉汉医学研究所,惠灵顿,新西兰;2西奈山伊坎医学院精密免疫学研究所,纽约,美国;3西奈山伊坎医学院肿瘤科学系,美国纽约;4西奈山伊坎医学院Tisch癌症研究所内科肝病科肝癌项目,纽约,美国;5惠灵顿维多利亚大学费里尔研究所,惠灵顿,新西兰;6新西兰奥克兰大学莫里斯威尔金斯分子生物发现中心,印度Fitt, Mikaela law1,2, Gen Johnston1, Charlotte daker2,3, Sam Simmonds2, Chris varghes1, Armen gharibans1,2, Christopher N. andrews2,4, Greg O' grady1,2, Stefan calder1,2;2新西兰奥克兰alimetry有限公司;3 .新西兰Waitemata的Whatu Ora;4卡尔加里大学,卡尔加里,加拿大;Stephanie Brown, Stephanie Landorf2, Anna richards, Stephanie fireman; 11新西兰克赖斯特彻奇奥塔哥大学;2阿德莱德妇女和儿童医院,澳大利亚阿德莱德;3新西兰奥克兰微型巨人胃肠病学中心;4新西兰奥克兰微型巨人胃肠病学中心;5新西兰克赖斯特彻奇奥塔哥大学吴伟1,尼古拉斯·达尔基1,弗兰克·韦勒1,杰瑞·金1,塔拉·福克斯11新西兰汉密尔顿怀卡托医院sam Simmonds3, Lynn wilsack2,3, Stefan calder1,3, Greg O' grady1,3, Matthew Woo2, Christopher N. andrews21新西兰奥克兰大学;2卡尔加里大学,加拿大卡尔加里;3测量技术有限公司,奥克兰,新西兰;chris varghes1, Homira Ayubi2, Mabel Tanne2, Shraddha Gulati2, Mehul Patel2, Amyn Haji2, Greg O'Grady1, Bu-Hussain haye21奥克兰大学,奥克兰;2国王学院医院,伦敦,英国汉娜·格里森1,辛西娅·温斯利2,科莱特·阿德里安2,海琳·普莱11 the Whatu Ora - cdhb But Also Wdhb,新西兰奥克兰;2奥克兰大学,奥克兰,新西兰;natasha Fasi, Blaithin Page, Dave mcgouran1陶朗加医院,陶朗加,新西兰;2罗托鲁瓦医院,罗托鲁瓦,新西兰罗托鲁瓦Richard Gearry1, William Hasler2, Thomas Abell3, Ashok Attaluri4, William Chey5, Michael cleine6, Peter Gibson7, Vincent Ho8, Allen Lee5, Anthony Lembo6, Amir Masoud9, Richard McCallum10, Baharak moshire11, Eamonn Quigley12, Satish Rao13, Abigail Stocker3, Mayra Sanchez9, Irene Sarosiek10, Brian Surjanhata14, Phoebe Thwaites7, Jerry周8,Braden ku1新西兰克赖斯特彻奇奥塔哥大学;2美国亚利桑那州斯科茨代尔梅奥诊所;3美国路易斯维尔大学,美国肯塔基州路易斯维尔;4奥拉西医疗中心,美国堪萨斯州奥拉西;5密歇根大学,美国密歇根州安娜堡;6克利夫兰诊所,美国俄亥俄州克利夫兰;7澳大利亚墨尔本莫纳什大学和阿尔弗雷德健康中心;8西悉尼大学,澳大利亚悉尼;9Hartford Healthcare, Fairfield, Connecticut, USA;10德克萨斯理工大学健康科学中心,美国德克萨斯州埃尔帕索;11维克森林大学,夏洛特,北卡罗来纳州,美国;12 .休斯顿卫理公会医院,美国德克萨斯州休斯顿;13美国乔治亚州奥古斯塔大学;14 akash Prasad1, Marshal Spenser Shuler1, Viswas Dayal2, Richelle Flanagan3, Gen Johnston4, Savindi wijenayak5, Peng Du56, Fiona Eileen lithander11新西兰奥克兰大学liggins研究所;2奥克兰市立医院神经内科,新西兰奥克兰;“我的行动很重要”,都柏林,爱尔兰;4奥克兰大学外科教研室,新西兰奥克兰;5奥克兰大学奥克兰生物工程研究所,新西兰奥克兰;6 alimetry有限公司。 henry Eglinton1, Samantha benson - pop2, Andrew McCombie13, Jeffrey Ngu12, Catherine Stedman12, Tamara glyn131奥塔哥大学,新西兰克赖斯特彻奇;2新西兰坎特伯雷基督城医院消化内科;3新西兰坎特伯雷基督城医院普外科rihoko Suzuki1, Jerry Chin2, Emily carr - boy3, Ben lawrence 4,5, Peter Johnston6, Marianne elston7,8, Veronica boyle4,7,81新西兰奥克兰大学;2新西兰汉密尔顿怀卡托医院消化内科;3新西兰奥克兰市托卡图玛医院病理学系,奥克兰;
{"title":"NZ Society of Gastroenterology Abstracts to NZSG & NZgNC Annual Scientific Meeting 2026 Abstracts","authors":"","doi":"10.1111/jgh.70203","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jgh.70203","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Ashley Anderson<sup>1</sup>, Chris Cederwall<sup>1</sup></p><p><sup>1</sup><i>Te Whatu Ora, Wellington, New Zealand</i></p><p>James Kang<sup>1</sup>, Robert Hackett<sup>1</sup></p><p><sup>1</sup><i>Health New Zealand Capital and Coast, Wellington, New Zealand</i></p><p>Catherine Jackson<sup>1</sup>, Karen Bartholomew<sup>1</sup>, Nina Bevin<sup>1</sup>, Rawiri McKree Jansen<sup>2</sup>, Joanne Hikaka<sup>3</sup>, Colin Mexted<sup>4</sup>, Helen Liley<sup>1</sup>, Lesley Overend<sup>5</sup>, Matt Blakiston<sup>5</sup>, Angela Fraser<sup>1</sup>, Sarah Hartnall<sup>1</sup>, Jean Wignall<sup>1</sup>, Malcolm Fletcher<sup>1</sup>, Jaylane Karanui<sup>1</sup>, Ed Gane<sup>6</sup></p><p><sup>1</sup><i>Planning, Funding and Outcomes, Health New Zealand, Waitemata, New Zealand; <sup>2</sup>Te Aka Whai Ora, Wellington, New Zealand; <sup>3</sup>Te Kupenga Hauora Māori, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand; <sup>4</sup>Aotearoa Drug Information Outreach Trust, Auckland, New Zealand; <sup>5</sup>Awanui Labs, Auckland, New Zealand; <sup>6</sup>Te Toka Tumai, Health New Zealand, Auckland, New Zealand</i></p><p>Andrew Thushyanthan<sup>1</sup>, Ravinder Ogra</p><p><sup>1</sup><i>Te Whatu Ora NZ, Auckland, New Zealand</i></p><p>Olivia Burn<sup>1,2,3,4</sup>, Marina Barcena-Varela<sup>2,3,4</sup>, Jordan Minnell<sup>1</sup>, Sarah Draper<sup>5</sup>, Gavin Painter<sup>5</sup>, Amaia Lujambio<sup>2,3,4</sup>, Ian Hermans<sup>16</sup></p><p><sup>1</sup><i>Malaghan Institute of Medical Research, Wellington, New Zealand; <sup>2</sup>The Precision Immunology Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA; <sup>3</sup>Department of Oncological Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA; <sup>4</sup>Liver Cancer Program, Division of Liver Diseases, Department of Medicine, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA; <sup>5</sup>Ferrier Research Institute, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand; <sup>6</sup>Maurice Wilkins Centre for Molecular Biodiscovery, Auckland, New Zealand</i></p><p>India Fitt, Mikaela Law<sup>1,2</sup>, Gen Johnston<sup>1</sup>, Charlotte Daker<sup>2,3</sup>, Sam Simmonds<sup>2</sup>, Chris Varghese<sup>1</sup>, Armen Gharibans<sup>1,2</sup>, Christopher N. Andrews<sup>2,4</sup>, Greg O'Grady<sup>1,2</sup>, Stefan Calder<sup>1,2</sup></p><p><sup>1</sup><i>The University of Auckland, Auckland; <sup>2</sup>Alimetry Ltd., Auckland, New Zealand; <sup>3</sup>Te Whatu Ora, Waitemata, New Zealand; <sup>4</sup>University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada</i></p><p>Stephanie Brown, Stephanie Landorf<sup>2</sup>, Anna Richards<sup>3</sup>, Stephanie Fireman<sup>3,1</sup></p><p><sup>1</sup><i>Otago University Christchurch, Christchurch, New Zealand; <sup>2</sup>Women's and Children's Hospital Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia; <sup>3</sup>Tiny Giants Gastroenterology, Auckland, New Zealand; <sup>4</sup>Tiny Giants Gastroenterolog","PeriodicalId":15877,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","volume":"41 S1","pages":"4-40"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jgh.70203","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146100233","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Is Cyst Wall Thickening Truly the Sole Risk Factor for Malignant Transformation in BD-IPMN?","authors":"Hongyi Jiang","doi":"10.1111/jgh.70244","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.70244","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15877,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146086080","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Response to the Letter Regarding \"Preventing Unnecessary ERCP in Patients With Spontaneous Bile Duct Stone Passage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis\".","authors":"Erfan Arabpour, Amir Sadeghi","doi":"10.1111/jgh.70247","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.70247","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15877,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146093132","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background and aim: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is widely used to treat superficial Barrett's esophageal adenocarcinoma (sBEA) in Japan. However, ESD for sBEA remains technically challenging because of respiratory motion and esophageal peristalsis. No studies have reported predictive factors for technical difficulty during ESDs for sBEA. This study aimed to identify predictive factors for technical difficulty during ESDs for sBEA.
Methods: This retrospective single-center cohort study included patients who were diagnosed with sBEA and subsequently underwent ESDs between April 2006 and January 2025. Patients with previous esophagectomies, chemoradiotherapy, and who underwent staged circumferential ESDs or simultaneous resections of multiple lesions were excluded. Technical difficulty was defined as resection times ≥ 120 min, perforations, incomplete treatment, or piecemeal resections. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the predictive factors for technical difficulty.
Results: In total, 188 patients with 199 lesions were analyzed, and 33 (16.6%) lesions met the criteria for technical difficulty. Multivariate analysis identified long-segment Barrett's esophagus (LSBE) (adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 2.380; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.010-5.620; p = 0.048) and circumferential involvement of ≥ 1/2 of the esophagus (adjusted OR: 4.460; 95% CI: 1.290-15.400; p = 0.018) as independent predictive factors. These were also associated with lower R0 resection and negative horizontal margin rates and a higher incidence of post-ESD strictures.
Conclusions: LSBE and circumferential involvement of ≥ 1/2 of the esophagus were identified as significant predictors of technical difficulty in ESDs for sBEA. Preoperative recognition of these factors may facilitate appropriate operator assignment and procedural strategies.
背景与目的:内镜下粘膜剥离术(ESD)在日本广泛应用于浅表性Barrett食管腺癌(sBEA)治疗。然而,由于呼吸运动和食管蠕动,sBEA的ESD在技术上仍然具有挑战性。目前还没有研究报道sBEA在esd过程中技术难度的预测因素。本研究旨在确定sBEA在静电放电过程中技术难度的预测因素。方法:这项回顾性单中心队列研究纳入了2006年4月至2025年1月期间诊断为sBEA并随后接受了ESDs的患者。排除既往食管切除术、放化疗、分期行周向静电放电或同时切除多个病变的患者。技术难度定义为切除时间≥120分钟、穿孔、治疗不完全或分段切除。进行单因素和多因素逻辑回归分析,以确定技术难度的预测因素。结果:共分析188例199个病灶,其中33个(16.6%)病灶符合技术难度标准。多因素分析发现,长段Barrett食管(LSBE)(校正优势比[OR]: 2.380; 95%可信区间[CI]: 1.010-5.620; p = 0.048)和食管周向累及≥1/2(校正优势比[OR]: 4.460; 95% CI: 1.290-15.400; p = 0.018)是独立的预测因素。这些也与较低的R0切除和负水平切缘率以及较高的esd后狭窄发生率相关。结论:LSBE和≥1/2的食管周向受累被认为是sBEA的ESDs技术难度的重要预测因素。术前对这些因素的认识有助于适当的操作人员分配和操作策略。
{"title":"Predictive Factors for Technical Difficulty During Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Superficial Barrett's Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.","authors":"Koyo Kido, Yusuke Horiuchi, Manabu Takamatsu, Hiroyuki Yamamoto, Chika Fukuyama, Akiyoshi Ishiyama, Toshiaki Hirasawa, Hayato Nakagawa, Toshiyuki Yoshio","doi":"10.1111/jgh.70260","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.70260","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is widely used to treat superficial Barrett's esophageal adenocarcinoma (sBEA) in Japan. However, ESD for sBEA remains technically challenging because of respiratory motion and esophageal peristalsis. No studies have reported predictive factors for technical difficulty during ESDs for sBEA. This study aimed to identify predictive factors for technical difficulty during ESDs for sBEA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective single-center cohort study included patients who were diagnosed with sBEA and subsequently underwent ESDs between April 2006 and January 2025. Patients with previous esophagectomies, chemoradiotherapy, and who underwent staged circumferential ESDs or simultaneous resections of multiple lesions were excluded. Technical difficulty was defined as resection times ≥ 120 min, perforations, incomplete treatment, or piecemeal resections. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the predictive factors for technical difficulty.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 188 patients with 199 lesions were analyzed, and 33 (16.6%) lesions met the criteria for technical difficulty. Multivariate analysis identified long-segment Barrett's esophagus (LSBE) (adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 2.380; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.010-5.620; p = 0.048) and circumferential involvement of ≥ 1/2 of the esophagus (adjusted OR: 4.460; 95% CI: 1.290-15.400; p = 0.018) as independent predictive factors. These were also associated with lower R0 resection and negative horizontal margin rates and a higher incidence of post-ESD strictures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LSBE and circumferential involvement of ≥ 1/2 of the esophagus were identified as significant predictors of technical difficulty in ESDs for sBEA. Preoperative recognition of these factors may facilitate appropriate operator assignment and procedural strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":15877,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146086045","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Liver diseases represent a major global health challenge, yet current treatment options remain insufficient, highlighting the need for new therapeutic strategies. Recent research underscores the crucial role of the gut microbiota and their metabolites in liver disease progression. Emerging evidence suggests that bacterial extracellular vesicles (BEVs), membrane-bound vesicles secreted by bacteria, play a critical role in hepatic inflammation, fibrosis, metabolic dysregulation, and tumor development, while commensal and probiotic-derived BEVs exhibit protective effects against these pathologies. This review provides a comprehensive overview of BEVs and their diverse roles in liver disease progression and treatment. Additionally, we discuss the current challenges in BEV research and propose future directions to improve our understanding of their effects on liver health and their potential therapeutic applications.
{"title":"Bacterial Extracellular Vesicles in the Pathogenesis and Treatment of Liver Diseases.","authors":"Yakun Li, Jia Li, Robin P F Dullaart, Han Moshage","doi":"10.1111/jgh.70264","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.70264","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Liver diseases represent a major global health challenge, yet current treatment options remain insufficient, highlighting the need for new therapeutic strategies. Recent research underscores the crucial role of the gut microbiota and their metabolites in liver disease progression. Emerging evidence suggests that bacterial extracellular vesicles (BEVs), membrane-bound vesicles secreted by bacteria, play a critical role in hepatic inflammation, fibrosis, metabolic dysregulation, and tumor development, while commensal and probiotic-derived BEVs exhibit protective effects against these pathologies. This review provides a comprehensive overview of BEVs and their diverse roles in liver disease progression and treatment. Additionally, we discuss the current challenges in BEV research and propose future directions to improve our understanding of their effects on liver health and their potential therapeutic applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":15877,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146086010","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Yu-Jin Kwon, Minhong Kim, Seok-Jae Heo, Ji-Won Lee
Background and aim: The triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) are emerging biomarkers linked to metabolic disturbances and liver health. Nonetheless, the combined impact of these markers on predicting new-onset steatotic liver disease (SLD) and its metabolic and alcohol-associated subtypes remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the association of TyG and ALT, individually and combined, in incident SLD in the Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study (KoGES) and UK Biobank cohorts.
Methods: This study utilized data from two large population-based cohorts: KoGES (adults aged 40-69 years from South Korea [2001-2002]) and UK Biobank (participants aged 37-73 years from the United Kingdom [2006-2010]). Participants without baseline SLD were classified into four groups based on TyG index and ALT levels, and the incidence of SLD was compared among these groups to assess risk.
Results: Elevated baseline TyG index and ALT levels were significantly associated with a higher risk of new-onset SLD and its subtypes in both cohorts. The highest HRs and ORs were observed in individuals with both markers elevated (2.39 in KoGES; 3.89 in UK Biobank). Survival analyses confirmed significantly lower survival probabilities in high-risk groups (p < 0.001). Predictive accuracy was highest with the combined TyG index + ALT model, outperforming either marker alone (p < 0.001).
Conclusions: Elevated combined baseline TyG index and ALT levels were significantly associated with increased risk of SLD and its subtypes. Combined use of these markers may be valuable for early identification and risk stratification of individuals at risk for SLD.
{"title":"Combined Impact of Triglyceride-Glucose Index and Alanine Aminotransferase on Steatotic Liver Disease and Subtypes.","authors":"Yu-Jin Kwon, Minhong Kim, Seok-Jae Heo, Ji-Won Lee","doi":"10.1111/jgh.70258","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.70258","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>The triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) are emerging biomarkers linked to metabolic disturbances and liver health. Nonetheless, the combined impact of these markers on predicting new-onset steatotic liver disease (SLD) and its metabolic and alcohol-associated subtypes remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the association of TyG and ALT, individually and combined, in incident SLD in the Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study (KoGES) and UK Biobank cohorts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study utilized data from two large population-based cohorts: KoGES (adults aged 40-69 years from South Korea [2001-2002]) and UK Biobank (participants aged 37-73 years from the United Kingdom [2006-2010]). Participants without baseline SLD were classified into four groups based on TyG index and ALT levels, and the incidence of SLD was compared among these groups to assess risk.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Elevated baseline TyG index and ALT levels were significantly associated with a higher risk of new-onset SLD and its subtypes in both cohorts. The highest HRs and ORs were observed in individuals with both markers elevated (2.39 in KoGES; 3.89 in UK Biobank). Survival analyses confirmed significantly lower survival probabilities in high-risk groups (p < 0.001). Predictive accuracy was highest with the combined TyG index + ALT model, outperforming either marker alone (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Elevated combined baseline TyG index and ALT levels were significantly associated with increased risk of SLD and its subtypes. Combined use of these markers may be valuable for early identification and risk stratification of individuals at risk for SLD.</p>","PeriodicalId":15877,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146064225","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}