Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-12-30DOI: 10.1111/jgh.70214
Yu Huang, Siqing Xie, Chunyan Yan, Junyong Zhang
Gastric intestinal metaplasia (GIM), a precancerous gastric lesion, represents a critical transitional stage in the Correa cascade that progresses from chronic inflammation to gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC). Emerging evidence implicates neutrophils as key orchestrators of GIM pathogenesis through multifaceted interactions within the tumor microenvironment. Therapeutic strategies targeting neutrophil activation, migration, and effector functions, including autophagy modulation and phenotypic reprogramming to an anti-inflammatory N2 state, hold promise in reversing GIM progression. This review synthesizes the current knowledge on neutrophil-mediated mechanisms and explores clinically actionable pathways for GIM reversibility.
{"title":"Neutrophil-Mediated Mechanisms and Therapeutic Reversibility of Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia.","authors":"Yu Huang, Siqing Xie, Chunyan Yan, Junyong Zhang","doi":"10.1111/jgh.70214","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jgh.70214","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Gastric intestinal metaplasia (GIM), a precancerous gastric lesion, represents a critical transitional stage in the Correa cascade that progresses from chronic inflammation to gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC). Emerging evidence implicates neutrophils as key orchestrators of GIM pathogenesis through multifaceted interactions within the tumor microenvironment. Therapeutic strategies targeting neutrophil activation, migration, and effector functions, including autophagy modulation and phenotypic reprogramming to an anti-inflammatory N2 state, hold promise in reversing GIM progression. This review synthesizes the current knowledge on neutrophil-mediated mechanisms and explores clinically actionable pathways for GIM reversibility.</p>","PeriodicalId":15877,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":"586-605"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145863053","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2026-01-18DOI: 10.1111/jgh.70223
Alexandra Mack, Emma P Halmos, Tamara Mogilevski, Ellen J Anderson, Kirstin M Taylor, Rebecca P Burgell, Peter R Gibson
Background and aims: Despite improved therapies targeting inflammation in inflammatory bowel disease, persistent gastrointestinal and extraintestinal symptoms in those believed to be in remission are highly prevalent with significant impact on patient function and quality of life. This review aims to summarize the scale of the problem, to identify the limitations of previous studies, and to propose how these may be addressed.
Methods: The published literature was extensively reviewed.
Results: Persistent gastrointestinal symptoms are reported in up to 40% of patients with inflammatory bowel disease in apparent remission and have mostly been characterized using the Rome criteria, which are unvalidated in this population. They are also closely linked to anxiety/depression and fatigue. Importantly, studies have frequently failed to use tests with high negative predictive values to exclude intestinal inflammation and have assumed severe symptoms are inflammatory in nature. The presence of ongoing inflammation and different mechanisms underlying the development of symptom-generating abnormalities, including visceral hypersensitivity and central sensitization, that are shared by disorders of gut-brain interaction are evident in the small number of studies performed. Thus, the concept that inflammatory and noninflammatory symptoms are mutually exclusive may be fallacious.
Conclusions: Persistent gastrointestinal symptoms are common in patients with inflammatory bowel disease in apparent remission, but variable criteria to define inflammatory remission may introduce a high risk of bias within existing literature. Further research using objective and robust measures of inflammatory remission is key to better defining this population and to clarifying pathophysiological mechanisms so that effective management strategies can be developed.
{"title":"A Critical Review of Persistent Gastrointestinal and Extraintestinal Symptoms in Quiescent Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Time for Greater Precision and Clarity.","authors":"Alexandra Mack, Emma P Halmos, Tamara Mogilevski, Ellen J Anderson, Kirstin M Taylor, Rebecca P Burgell, Peter R Gibson","doi":"10.1111/jgh.70223","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jgh.70223","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Despite improved therapies targeting inflammation in inflammatory bowel disease, persistent gastrointestinal and extraintestinal symptoms in those believed to be in remission are highly prevalent with significant impact on patient function and quality of life. This review aims to summarize the scale of the problem, to identify the limitations of previous studies, and to propose how these may be addressed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The published literature was extensively reviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Persistent gastrointestinal symptoms are reported in up to 40% of patients with inflammatory bowel disease in apparent remission and have mostly been characterized using the Rome criteria, which are unvalidated in this population. They are also closely linked to anxiety/depression and fatigue. Importantly, studies have frequently failed to use tests with high negative predictive values to exclude intestinal inflammation and have assumed severe symptoms are inflammatory in nature. The presence of ongoing inflammation and different mechanisms underlying the development of symptom-generating abnormalities, including visceral hypersensitivity and central sensitization, that are shared by disorders of gut-brain interaction are evident in the small number of studies performed. Thus, the concept that inflammatory and noninflammatory symptoms are mutually exclusive may be fallacious.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Persistent gastrointestinal symptoms are common in patients with inflammatory bowel disease in apparent remission, but variable criteria to define inflammatory remission may introduce a high risk of bias within existing literature. Further research using objective and robust measures of inflammatory remission is key to better defining this population and to clarifying pathophysiological mechanisms so that effective management strategies can be developed.</p>","PeriodicalId":15877,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":"625-648"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145998311","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
<p>Ashley Anderson<sup>1</sup>, Chris Cederwall<sup>1</sup></p><p><sup>1</sup><i>Te Whatu Ora, Wellington, New Zealand</i></p><p>James Kang<sup>1</sup>, Robert Hackett<sup>1</sup></p><p><sup>1</sup><i>Health New Zealand Capital and Coast, Wellington, New Zealand</i></p><p>Catherine Jackson<sup>1</sup>, Karen Bartholomew<sup>1</sup>, Nina Bevin<sup>1</sup>, Rawiri McKree Jansen<sup>2</sup>, Joanne Hikaka<sup>3</sup>, Colin Mexted<sup>4</sup>, Helen Liley<sup>1</sup>, Lesley Overend<sup>5</sup>, Matt Blakiston<sup>5</sup>, Angela Fraser<sup>1</sup>, Sarah Hartnall<sup>1</sup>, Jean Wignall<sup>1</sup>, Malcolm Fletcher<sup>1</sup>, Jaylane Karanui<sup>1</sup>, Ed Gane<sup>6</sup></p><p><sup>1</sup><i>Planning, Funding and Outcomes, Health New Zealand, Waitemata, New Zealand; <sup>2</sup>Te Aka Whai Ora, Wellington, New Zealand; <sup>3</sup>Te Kupenga Hauora Māori, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand; <sup>4</sup>Aotearoa Drug Information Outreach Trust, Auckland, New Zealand; <sup>5</sup>Awanui Labs, Auckland, New Zealand; <sup>6</sup>Te Toka Tumai, Health New Zealand, Auckland, New Zealand</i></p><p>Andrew Thushyanthan<sup>1</sup>, Ravinder Ogra</p><p><sup>1</sup><i>Te Whatu Ora NZ, Auckland, New Zealand</i></p><p>Olivia Burn<sup>1,2,3,4</sup>, Marina Barcena-Varela<sup>2,3,4</sup>, Jordan Minnell<sup>1</sup>, Sarah Draper<sup>5</sup>, Gavin Painter<sup>5</sup>, Amaia Lujambio<sup>2,3,4</sup>, Ian Hermans<sup>16</sup></p><p><sup>1</sup><i>Malaghan Institute of Medical Research, Wellington, New Zealand; <sup>2</sup>The Precision Immunology Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA; <sup>3</sup>Department of Oncological Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA; <sup>4</sup>Liver Cancer Program, Division of Liver Diseases, Department of Medicine, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA; <sup>5</sup>Ferrier Research Institute, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand; <sup>6</sup>Maurice Wilkins Centre for Molecular Biodiscovery, Auckland, New Zealand</i></p><p>India Fitt, Mikaela Law<sup>1,2</sup>, Gen Johnston<sup>1</sup>, Charlotte Daker<sup>2,3</sup>, Sam Simmonds<sup>2</sup>, Chris Varghese<sup>1</sup>, Armen Gharibans<sup>1,2</sup>, Christopher N. Andrews<sup>2,4</sup>, Greg O'Grady<sup>1,2</sup>, Stefan Calder<sup>1,2</sup></p><p><sup>1</sup><i>The University of Auckland, Auckland; <sup>2</sup>Alimetry Ltd., Auckland, New Zealand; <sup>3</sup>Te Whatu Ora, Waitemata, New Zealand; <sup>4</sup>University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada</i></p><p>Stephanie Brown, Stephanie Landorf<sup>2</sup>, Anna Richards<sup>3</sup>, Stephanie Fireman<sup>3,1</sup></p><p><sup>1</sup><i>Otago University Christchurch, Christchurch, New Zealand; <sup>2</sup>Women's and Children's Hospital Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia; <sup>3</sup>Tiny Giants Gastroenterology, Auckland, New Zealand; <sup>4</sup>Tiny Giants Gastroenterolog
Ashley Anderson1, Chris cederwall11 the Whatu Ora,惠灵顿,新西兰;james Kang1, Robert hackett 11新西兰首都和海岸卫生部,惠灵顿,新西兰;catherine Jackson1, Karen bartholome1, Nina Bevin1, Rawiri McKree Jansen2, Joanne hikak3, Colin Mexted4, Helen Liley1, Lesley Overend5, Matt Blakiston5, Angela Fraser1, Sarah Hartnall1, Jean Wignall1, Malcolm Fletcher1, Jaylane karanu1, Ed gane61新西兰卫生部,Waitemata;2 . the Aka Whai Ora,惠灵顿,新西兰;3 . The Kupenga Hauora Māori,奥克兰大学,奥克兰,新西兰;4新西兰奥克兰aotearoa药物信息推广信托基金;5Awanui实验室,奥克兰,新西兰;6 the Toka Tumai,新西兰卫生部,奥克兰,新西兰andrew Thushyanthan1, Ravinder ogra1 the Whatu Ora NZ,奥克兰,新西兰olivia bur1,2,3,4, Marina barcena - varela2,3,4, Jordan Minnell1, Sarah Draper5, Gavin Painter5, Amaia lujambio2,3,4, Ian hermans 161马拉汉医学研究所,惠灵顿,新西兰;2西奈山伊坎医学院精密免疫学研究所,纽约,美国;3西奈山伊坎医学院肿瘤科学系,美国纽约;4西奈山伊坎医学院Tisch癌症研究所内科肝病科肝癌项目,纽约,美国;5惠灵顿维多利亚大学费里尔研究所,惠灵顿,新西兰;6新西兰奥克兰大学莫里斯威尔金斯分子生物发现中心,印度Fitt, Mikaela law1,2, Gen Johnston1, Charlotte daker2,3, Sam Simmonds2, Chris varghes1, Armen gharibans1,2, Christopher N. andrews2,4, Greg O' grady1,2, Stefan calder1,2;2新西兰奥克兰alimetry有限公司;3 .新西兰Waitemata的Whatu Ora;4卡尔加里大学,卡尔加里,加拿大;Stephanie Brown, Stephanie Landorf2, Anna richards, Stephanie fireman; 11新西兰克赖斯特彻奇奥塔哥大学;2阿德莱德妇女和儿童医院,澳大利亚阿德莱德;3新西兰奥克兰微型巨人胃肠病学中心;4新西兰奥克兰微型巨人胃肠病学中心;5新西兰克赖斯特彻奇奥塔哥大学吴伟1,尼古拉斯·达尔基1,弗兰克·韦勒1,杰瑞·金1,塔拉·福克斯11新西兰汉密尔顿怀卡托医院sam Simmonds3, Lynn wilsack2,3, Stefan calder1,3, Greg O' grady1,3, Matthew Woo2, Christopher N. andrews21新西兰奥克兰大学;2卡尔加里大学,加拿大卡尔加里;3测量技术有限公司,奥克兰,新西兰;chris varghes1, Homira Ayubi2, Mabel Tanne2, Shraddha Gulati2, Mehul Patel2, Amyn Haji2, Greg O'Grady1, Bu-Hussain haye21奥克兰大学,奥克兰;2国王学院医院,伦敦,英国汉娜·格里森1,辛西娅·温斯利2,科莱特·阿德里安2,海琳·普莱11 the Whatu Ora - cdhb But Also Wdhb,新西兰奥克兰;2奥克兰大学,奥克兰,新西兰;natasha Fasi, Blaithin Page, Dave mcgouran1陶朗加医院,陶朗加,新西兰;2罗托鲁瓦医院,罗托鲁瓦,新西兰罗托鲁瓦Richard Gearry1, William Hasler2, Thomas Abell3, Ashok Attaluri4, William Chey5, Michael cleine6, Peter Gibson7, Vincent Ho8, Allen Lee5, Anthony Lembo6, Amir Masoud9, Richard McCallum10, Baharak moshire11, Eamonn Quigley12, Satish Rao13, Abigail Stocker3, Mayra Sanchez9, Irene Sarosiek10, Brian Surjanhata14, Phoebe Thwaites7, Jerry周8,Braden ku1新西兰克赖斯特彻奇奥塔哥大学;2美国亚利桑那州斯科茨代尔梅奥诊所;3美国路易斯维尔大学,美国肯塔基州路易斯维尔;4奥拉西医疗中心,美国堪萨斯州奥拉西;5密歇根大学,美国密歇根州安娜堡;6克利夫兰诊所,美国俄亥俄州克利夫兰;7澳大利亚墨尔本莫纳什大学和阿尔弗雷德健康中心;8西悉尼大学,澳大利亚悉尼;9Hartford Healthcare, Fairfield, Connecticut, USA;10德克萨斯理工大学健康科学中心,美国德克萨斯州埃尔帕索;11维克森林大学,夏洛特,北卡罗来纳州,美国;12 .休斯顿卫理公会医院,美国德克萨斯州休斯顿;13美国乔治亚州奥古斯塔大学;14 akash Prasad1, Marshal Spenser Shuler1, Viswas Dayal2, Richelle Flanagan3, Gen Johnston4, Savindi wijenayak5, Peng Du56, Fiona Eileen lithander11新西兰奥克兰大学liggins研究所;2奥克兰市立医院神经内科,新西兰奥克兰;“我的行动很重要”,都柏林,爱尔兰;4奥克兰大学外科教研室,新西兰奥克兰;5奥克兰大学奥克兰生物工程研究所,新西兰奥克兰;6 alimetry有限公司。 henry Eglinton1, Samantha benson - pop2, Andrew McCombie13, Jeffrey Ngu12, Catherine Stedman12, Tamara glyn131奥塔哥大学,新西兰克赖斯特彻奇;2新西兰坎特伯雷基督城医院消化内科;3新西兰坎特伯雷基督城医院普外科rihoko Suzuki1, Jerry Chin2, Emily carr - boy3, Ben lawrence 4,5, Peter Johnston6, Marianne elston7,8, Veronica boyle4,7,81新西兰奥克兰大学;2新西兰汉密尔顿怀卡托医院消化内科;3新西兰奥克兰市托卡图玛医院病理学系,奥克兰;
{"title":"NZ Society of Gastroenterology Abstracts to NZSG & NZgNC Annual Scientific Meeting 2026 Abstracts","authors":"","doi":"10.1111/jgh.70203","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jgh.70203","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Ashley Anderson<sup>1</sup>, Chris Cederwall<sup>1</sup></p><p><sup>1</sup><i>Te Whatu Ora, Wellington, New Zealand</i></p><p>James Kang<sup>1</sup>, Robert Hackett<sup>1</sup></p><p><sup>1</sup><i>Health New Zealand Capital and Coast, Wellington, New Zealand</i></p><p>Catherine Jackson<sup>1</sup>, Karen Bartholomew<sup>1</sup>, Nina Bevin<sup>1</sup>, Rawiri McKree Jansen<sup>2</sup>, Joanne Hikaka<sup>3</sup>, Colin Mexted<sup>4</sup>, Helen Liley<sup>1</sup>, Lesley Overend<sup>5</sup>, Matt Blakiston<sup>5</sup>, Angela Fraser<sup>1</sup>, Sarah Hartnall<sup>1</sup>, Jean Wignall<sup>1</sup>, Malcolm Fletcher<sup>1</sup>, Jaylane Karanui<sup>1</sup>, Ed Gane<sup>6</sup></p><p><sup>1</sup><i>Planning, Funding and Outcomes, Health New Zealand, Waitemata, New Zealand; <sup>2</sup>Te Aka Whai Ora, Wellington, New Zealand; <sup>3</sup>Te Kupenga Hauora Māori, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand; <sup>4</sup>Aotearoa Drug Information Outreach Trust, Auckland, New Zealand; <sup>5</sup>Awanui Labs, Auckland, New Zealand; <sup>6</sup>Te Toka Tumai, Health New Zealand, Auckland, New Zealand</i></p><p>Andrew Thushyanthan<sup>1</sup>, Ravinder Ogra</p><p><sup>1</sup><i>Te Whatu Ora NZ, Auckland, New Zealand</i></p><p>Olivia Burn<sup>1,2,3,4</sup>, Marina Barcena-Varela<sup>2,3,4</sup>, Jordan Minnell<sup>1</sup>, Sarah Draper<sup>5</sup>, Gavin Painter<sup>5</sup>, Amaia Lujambio<sup>2,3,4</sup>, Ian Hermans<sup>16</sup></p><p><sup>1</sup><i>Malaghan Institute of Medical Research, Wellington, New Zealand; <sup>2</sup>The Precision Immunology Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA; <sup>3</sup>Department of Oncological Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA; <sup>4</sup>Liver Cancer Program, Division of Liver Diseases, Department of Medicine, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA; <sup>5</sup>Ferrier Research Institute, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand; <sup>6</sup>Maurice Wilkins Centre for Molecular Biodiscovery, Auckland, New Zealand</i></p><p>India Fitt, Mikaela Law<sup>1,2</sup>, Gen Johnston<sup>1</sup>, Charlotte Daker<sup>2,3</sup>, Sam Simmonds<sup>2</sup>, Chris Varghese<sup>1</sup>, Armen Gharibans<sup>1,2</sup>, Christopher N. Andrews<sup>2,4</sup>, Greg O'Grady<sup>1,2</sup>, Stefan Calder<sup>1,2</sup></p><p><sup>1</sup><i>The University of Auckland, Auckland; <sup>2</sup>Alimetry Ltd., Auckland, New Zealand; <sup>3</sup>Te Whatu Ora, Waitemata, New Zealand; <sup>4</sup>University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada</i></p><p>Stephanie Brown, Stephanie Landorf<sup>2</sup>, Anna Richards<sup>3</sup>, Stephanie Fireman<sup>3,1</sup></p><p><sup>1</sup><i>Otago University Christchurch, Christchurch, New Zealand; <sup>2</sup>Women's and Children's Hospital Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia; <sup>3</sup>Tiny Giants Gastroenterology, Auckland, New Zealand; <sup>4</sup>Tiny Giants Gastroenterolog","PeriodicalId":15877,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","volume":"41 S1","pages":"4-40"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jgh.70203","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146100233","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-12-02DOI: 10.1111/jgh.70179
Youyu Cheng, Qiang Ye, Mingjie He, Wenjun Ma, Peipei Luo
Background and aim: Increasing antibiotic resistance rates and cost constraints necessitate optimized Helicobacter pylori therapies. This trial compared the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of vonoprazan-amoxicillin dual therapy versus bismuth quadruple therapy for H. pylori eradication using China's centralized procurement antibiotics.
Methods: In this multicenter, randomized, controlled trial, 534 treatment-naïve H. pylori-infected patients were assessed, with 450 patients ultimately assigned to the VNCDPA-dual (vonoprazan 20 mg BID + amoxicillin 1 g TID), B-quadruple (esomeprazole 20 mg BID + non-procurement amoxicillin 1 g BID + clarithromycin 500 mg BID + bismuth 600 mg BID), or BNCDPA-quadruple group (same as B-quadruple but with amoxicillin obtained via centralized procurement). Eradication rates were assessed using the urea breath test [per-protocol (PP) and intention-to-treat (ITT) analyses]. Adverse events (AEs) and costs were systematically evaluated.
Results: Eradication rates were comparable among groups [92.1% (B-quadruple) vs. 90.7% (BNCDPA-quadruple) vs. 91.7% (VNCDPA-dual) in PP analysis (p = 0.889); 85.3% vs. 84.7% vs. and 88.0% in ITT analysis (p = 0.947)]. VNCDPA-dual demonstrated superior safety, with significantly fewer AEs (6.8% vs. 17.9%-19%; p = 0.003), particularly dysgeusia (1.4% vs. 15.2%-15.6%; p < 0.001). Centralized procurement amoxicillin reduced costs by 44% (¥239 per course vs. ¥315 per course) without compromising efficacy. Compliance was highest in the VNCDPA-dual group (99% vs. 95.9.7%-95.2% in the quadruple groups, p < 0.04).
Conclusion: This study confirms that 10-day vonoprazan-amoxicillin dual therapy (using National Centralized Drug Procurement antibiotics) demonstrates noninferior efficacy to bismuth quadruple therapy while offering superior safety, better compliance, and the advantage of shorter treatment duration. These findings support its adoption as a first-line regimen for large-scale H. pylori eradication programs.
背景与目的:不断增加的抗生素耐药率和成本限制需要优化幽门螺杆菌治疗。本试验比较了vonoprazan-阿莫西林双重治疗与铋四联治疗在中国集中采购抗生素根除幽门螺杆菌中的疗效、安全性和成本效益。方法:在这项多中心、随机、对照试验中,对534例treatment-naïve幽门幽门杆菌感染患者进行了评估,其中450例患者最终被分配到VNCDPA-dual组(伏诺哌嗪20mg BID +阿莫西林1g TID)、b -四联组(埃索美拉唑20mg BID +非采购阿莫西林1g BID +克拉霉素500mg BID +铋600mg BID)或bncdpa -四联组(与b -四联组相同,但通过集中采购阿莫西林)。使用尿素呼气试验[按方案(PP)和意向治疗(ITT)分析]评估根除率。系统评估不良事件(ae)和成本。结果:PP分析组间根除率具有可比性[92.1% (b -四联)vs 90.7% (bncdpa -四联)vs 91.7% (vncdpa -双联)](p = 0.889);85.3% vs. 84.7% vs. 88.0% (p = 0.947)]。VNCDPA-dual显示出更优越的安全性,ae明显更少(6.8% vs. 17.9%-19%; p = 0.003),尤其是读写障碍(1.4% vs. 15.2%-15.6%)。结论:本研究证实,10天伏诺哌唑-阿莫西林双药治疗(使用国家集中采购抗生素)的疗效不低于铋四药治疗,同时具有更高的安全性、更好的依从性和更短治疗时间的优势。这些发现支持将其作为大规模幽门螺杆菌根除计划的一线方案。
{"title":"Randomized Comparison of Vonoprazan-Amoxicillin Dual Therapy Versus Bismuth Quadruple Therapies for Helicobacter pylori Eradication: A Multicenter Trial Evaluating National Centralized Drug Procurement Antibiotics.","authors":"Youyu Cheng, Qiang Ye, Mingjie He, Wenjun Ma, Peipei Luo","doi":"10.1111/jgh.70179","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jgh.70179","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>Increasing antibiotic resistance rates and cost constraints necessitate optimized Helicobacter pylori therapies. This trial compared the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of vonoprazan-amoxicillin dual therapy versus bismuth quadruple therapy for H. pylori eradication using China's centralized procurement antibiotics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this multicenter, randomized, controlled trial, 534 treatment-naïve H. pylori-infected patients were assessed, with 450 patients ultimately assigned to the VNCDPA-dual (vonoprazan 20 mg BID + amoxicillin 1 g TID), B-quadruple (esomeprazole 20 mg BID + non-procurement amoxicillin 1 g BID + clarithromycin 500 mg BID + bismuth 600 mg BID), or BNCDPA-quadruple group (same as B-quadruple but with amoxicillin obtained via centralized procurement). Eradication rates were assessed using the urea breath test [per-protocol (PP) and intention-to-treat (ITT) analyses]. Adverse events (AEs) and costs were systematically evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eradication rates were comparable among groups [92.1% (B-quadruple) vs. 90.7% (BNCDPA-quadruple) vs. 91.7% (VNCDPA-dual) in PP analysis (p = 0.889); 85.3% vs. 84.7% vs. and 88.0% in ITT analysis (p = 0.947)]. VNCDPA-dual demonstrated superior safety, with significantly fewer AEs (6.8% vs. 17.9%-19%; p = 0.003), particularly dysgeusia (1.4% vs. 15.2%-15.6%; p < 0.001). Centralized procurement amoxicillin reduced costs by 44% (¥239 per course vs. ¥315 per course) without compromising efficacy. Compliance was highest in the VNCDPA-dual group (99% vs. 95.9.7%-95.2% in the quadruple groups, p < 0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study confirms that 10-day vonoprazan-amoxicillin dual therapy (using National Centralized Drug Procurement antibiotics) demonstrates noninferior efficacy to bismuth quadruple therapy while offering superior safety, better compliance, and the advantage of shorter treatment duration. These findings support its adoption as a first-line regimen for large-scale H. pylori eradication programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":15877,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":"649-656"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145661563","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2026-01-02DOI: 10.1111/jgh.70228
Karina González-García, Cecilia Zertuche-Martínez, Itayetzi Reyes-Avendaño, Edilburga Reyes-Jiménez, Pablo Muriel, Saúl Villa-Treviño, Jaime Arellanes-Robledo, Rafael Baltiérrez-Hoyos, Verónica Rocío Vásquez-Garzón
Chronic non-viral liver diseases (CNVLD), including alcohol-related liver disease (ALD) and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), have increased in prevalence, surpassing viral hepatitis as the main cause of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the last decade; thus, the identification of bloodstream biomarkers is essential for early diagnosis, risk stratification, and monitoring progression. This study aimed to systematically integrate and compare proteomic evidence from blood-based studies to identify differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) associated with ALD, MASLD, and HCC of non-viral etiology, to prioritize them as candidates for shared biomarkers and diagnostics for each disease. A systematic review was conducted, followed by a qualitative meta-analysis to identify DEPs bloodstream biomarkers. Biomarkers were compared across diseases to detect overlaps. Functional enrichment, network, and topological analyses were used to evaluate their biological relevance. We identified 16 diagnostic biomarkers for ALD, 53 for MASLD, and 8 for HCC. Four biomarkers were shared among ALD and MASLD, two among ALD and HCC, and two among MASLD and HCC. Functional analyses indicated platelet dysfunction and coagulation pathway alterations in ALD; lipid metabolism dysregulation in MASLD; and a combination of these processes in HCC patients. Network analysis highlighted key biomarkers with potential diagnostic and prognostic applications. The identified biomarkers reflect both shared and disease-specific molecular mechanisms in the progression of CNVLD toward HCC. Their consistent presence across independent studies supports their potential integration into diagnostic and prognostic panels, particularly in the context of the rising prevalence of ALD and MASLD worldwide.
{"title":"An Integrated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis From the Bloodstream to Identify Potential Biomarkers for ALD, MASLD, and HCC Without a Viral Background.","authors":"Karina González-García, Cecilia Zertuche-Martínez, Itayetzi Reyes-Avendaño, Edilburga Reyes-Jiménez, Pablo Muriel, Saúl Villa-Treviño, Jaime Arellanes-Robledo, Rafael Baltiérrez-Hoyos, Verónica Rocío Vásquez-Garzón","doi":"10.1111/jgh.70228","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jgh.70228","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chronic non-viral liver diseases (CNVLD), including alcohol-related liver disease (ALD) and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), have increased in prevalence, surpassing viral hepatitis as the main cause of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the last decade; thus, the identification of bloodstream biomarkers is essential for early diagnosis, risk stratification, and monitoring progression. This study aimed to systematically integrate and compare proteomic evidence from blood-based studies to identify differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) associated with ALD, MASLD, and HCC of non-viral etiology, to prioritize them as candidates for shared biomarkers and diagnostics for each disease. A systematic review was conducted, followed by a qualitative meta-analysis to identify DEPs bloodstream biomarkers. Biomarkers were compared across diseases to detect overlaps. Functional enrichment, network, and topological analyses were used to evaluate their biological relevance. We identified 16 diagnostic biomarkers for ALD, 53 for MASLD, and 8 for HCC. Four biomarkers were shared among ALD and MASLD, two among ALD and HCC, and two among MASLD and HCC. Functional analyses indicated platelet dysfunction and coagulation pathway alterations in ALD; lipid metabolism dysregulation in MASLD; and a combination of these processes in HCC patients. Network analysis highlighted key biomarkers with potential diagnostic and prognostic applications. The identified biomarkers reflect both shared and disease-specific molecular mechanisms in the progression of CNVLD toward HCC. Their consistent presence across independent studies supports their potential integration into diagnostic and prognostic panels, particularly in the context of the rising prevalence of ALD and MASLD worldwide.</p>","PeriodicalId":15877,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":"502-515"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145889154","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background and aims: Malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) often necessitates endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for biliary drainage. Although ERCP is the standard treatment, post-procedural infections such as cholangitis and cholecystitis remain clinically important. Current guidelines recommend prophylactic antibiotics only for high-risk cases. However, data focused specifically on patients with distal MBO (DMBO) undergoing stent placement are limited. This study evaluated the effect of peri-ERCP antibiotics on post-ERCP infectious adverse events in DMBO.
Methods: This multicenter retrospective study included 508 patients who underwent initial biliary stent placement for DMBO between January 2020 and August 2024 at five institutions. Patients were categorized according to whether they received peri-ERCP antibiotics. Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed using clinically relevant covariates. The primary outcome was the incidence of infectious adverse events (cholangitis or cholecystitis) within 5 days of ERCP.
Results: After matching, 165 patients were included in each group. The incidence of infectious adverse events was significantly lower in the peri-ERCP antibiotic group (3.6%) compared with the nonantibiotic group (10.3%), with a risk difference (RD) of 6.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.2-12.1). Post-ERCP pancreatitis occurred in 10 patients (6.1%) without prophylaxis and 16 (9.7%) with prophylaxis, showing no significant difference (RD: -3.6%, 95% CI: -9.4 to 2.2). Subgroup analysis suggested greater benefit in patients with nonpancreatic cancer (RD, 0.206; 95% CI, 0.07-0.342; p = 0.011) or a bile duct diameter > 10 mm (RD, 0.104; 95% CI, 0.046-0.163; p = 0.001).
Conclusions: Peri-ERCP antibiotics may reduce post-ERCP infectious adverse events in patients with DMBO.
{"title":"Impact of Peri-Procedural Antibiotics on Post-ERCP Infectious Adverse Events With Distal Malignant Biliary Obstruction.","authors":"Tatsunori Satoh, Haruna Takahashi, Eiji Nakatani, Yosuke Kobayashi, Fumitaka Niiya, Junichi Kaneko, Kazuma Ishikawa, Kenta Ito, Tetsushi Azami, Jun Noda, Shinya Kawaguchi","doi":"10.1111/jgh.70211","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jgh.70211","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) often necessitates endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for biliary drainage. Although ERCP is the standard treatment, post-procedural infections such as cholangitis and cholecystitis remain clinically important. Current guidelines recommend prophylactic antibiotics only for high-risk cases. However, data focused specifically on patients with distal MBO (DMBO) undergoing stent placement are limited. This study evaluated the effect of peri-ERCP antibiotics on post-ERCP infectious adverse events in DMBO.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter retrospective study included 508 patients who underwent initial biliary stent placement for DMBO between January 2020 and August 2024 at five institutions. Patients were categorized according to whether they received peri-ERCP antibiotics. Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed using clinically relevant covariates. The primary outcome was the incidence of infectious adverse events (cholangitis or cholecystitis) within 5 days of ERCP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After matching, 165 patients were included in each group. The incidence of infectious adverse events was significantly lower in the peri-ERCP antibiotic group (3.6%) compared with the nonantibiotic group (10.3%), with a risk difference (RD) of 6.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.2-12.1). Post-ERCP pancreatitis occurred in 10 patients (6.1%) without prophylaxis and 16 (9.7%) with prophylaxis, showing no significant difference (RD: -3.6%, 95% CI: -9.4 to 2.2). Subgroup analysis suggested greater benefit in patients with nonpancreatic cancer (RD, 0.206; 95% CI, 0.07-0.342; p = 0.011) or a bile duct diameter > 10 mm (RD, 0.104; 95% CI, 0.046-0.163; p = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Peri-ERCP antibiotics may reduce post-ERCP infectious adverse events in patients with DMBO.</p>","PeriodicalId":15877,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":"696-704"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145856807","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Adequate bowel preparation is crucial for high-quality colonoscopy; however, assessing preparation adequacy can be burdensome for both healthcare providers and patients. In this study, we aimed to develop artificial intelligence (AI) models for the automated identification of bowel PREParation for cOlonoscOpy (AI-PREPOO).
Methods: On the day of colonoscopy, participants were instructed to use smartphones to photograph their stool in the toilet after each bowel movement following initiation of polyethylene glycol solution and upload the images to a secure web server. All images were labeled as "ready" or "not ready" for colonoscopy based on clarity and the absence of solid content. Using these labeled images, four image-recognition models based on different deep learning architectures (AI-PREPOO 1-4) were developed using transfer learning to classify stool status as "ready" or "not ready."
Results: A total of 282 stool images were collected from 37 patients, with 141 images labeled as "ready" and 141 as "not ready." These images were divided into training (224 images) and test (58 images) sets, and the training set was augmented to 2240 images. All models trained on the augmented dataset achieved high performance, with area under the curve (AUC) values exceeding 0.90. AI-PREPOO 1, based on MobileNetV3-Small, demonstrated the most balanced sensitivity-specificity profile (AUC, 0.95; sensitivity, 0.93; specificity, 0.86).
Conclusions: We developed AI-based models capable of accurately assessing bowel preparation adequacy. AI-PREPOO 1 showed a well-balanced diagnostic performance, suggesting its potential to facilitate bowel preparation assessment and reduce the burden on healthcare providers and patients.
{"title":"Artificial Intelligence Model for Automated Identification of Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy (AI-PREPOO): A Multicenter Study.","authors":"Kosuke Kojima, Kazuya Takahashi, Hiroki Maruyama, Nao Nakajima, Hiroki Sato, Ken-Ichi Mizuno, Shuji Terai","doi":"10.1111/jgh.70235","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jgh.70235","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adequate bowel preparation is crucial for high-quality colonoscopy; however, assessing preparation adequacy can be burdensome for both healthcare providers and patients. In this study, we aimed to develop artificial intelligence (AI) models for the automated identification of bowel PREParation for cOlonoscOpy (AI-PREPOO).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>On the day of colonoscopy, participants were instructed to use smartphones to photograph their stool in the toilet after each bowel movement following initiation of polyethylene glycol solution and upload the images to a secure web server. All images were labeled as \"ready\" or \"not ready\" for colonoscopy based on clarity and the absence of solid content. Using these labeled images, four image-recognition models based on different deep learning architectures (AI-PREPOO 1-4) were developed using transfer learning to classify stool status as \"ready\" or \"not ready.\"</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 282 stool images were collected from 37 patients, with 141 images labeled as \"ready\" and 141 as \"not ready.\" These images were divided into training (224 images) and test (58 images) sets, and the training set was augmented to 2240 images. All models trained on the augmented dataset achieved high performance, with area under the curve (AUC) values exceeding 0.90. AI-PREPOO 1, based on MobileNetV3-Small, demonstrated the most balanced sensitivity-specificity profile (AUC, 0.95; sensitivity, 0.93; specificity, 0.86).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We developed AI-based models capable of accurately assessing bowel preparation adequacy. AI-PREPOO 1 showed a well-balanced diagnostic performance, suggesting its potential to facilitate bowel preparation assessment and reduce the burden on healthcare providers and patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":15877,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":"678-685"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145952058","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Is Cyst Wall Thickening Truly the Sole Risk Factor for Malignant Transformation in BD-IPMN?","authors":"Hongyi Jiang","doi":"10.1111/jgh.70244","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.70244","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15877,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146086080","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Response to the Letter Regarding \"Preventing Unnecessary ERCP in Patients With Spontaneous Bile Duct Stone Passage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis\".","authors":"Erfan Arabpour, Amir Sadeghi","doi":"10.1111/jgh.70247","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.70247","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15877,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146093132","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background and aim: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is widely used to treat superficial Barrett's esophageal adenocarcinoma (sBEA) in Japan. However, ESD for sBEA remains technically challenging because of respiratory motion and esophageal peristalsis. No studies have reported predictive factors for technical difficulty during ESDs for sBEA. This study aimed to identify predictive factors for technical difficulty during ESDs for sBEA.
Methods: This retrospective single-center cohort study included patients who were diagnosed with sBEA and subsequently underwent ESDs between April 2006 and January 2025. Patients with previous esophagectomies, chemoradiotherapy, and who underwent staged circumferential ESDs or simultaneous resections of multiple lesions were excluded. Technical difficulty was defined as resection times ≥ 120 min, perforations, incomplete treatment, or piecemeal resections. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the predictive factors for technical difficulty.
Results: In total, 188 patients with 199 lesions were analyzed, and 33 (16.6%) lesions met the criteria for technical difficulty. Multivariate analysis identified long-segment Barrett's esophagus (LSBE) (adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 2.380; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.010-5.620; p = 0.048) and circumferential involvement of ≥ 1/2 of the esophagus (adjusted OR: 4.460; 95% CI: 1.290-15.400; p = 0.018) as independent predictive factors. These were also associated with lower R0 resection and negative horizontal margin rates and a higher incidence of post-ESD strictures.
Conclusions: LSBE and circumferential involvement of ≥ 1/2 of the esophagus were identified as significant predictors of technical difficulty in ESDs for sBEA. Preoperative recognition of these factors may facilitate appropriate operator assignment and procedural strategies.
背景与目的:内镜下粘膜剥离术(ESD)在日本广泛应用于浅表性Barrett食管腺癌(sBEA)治疗。然而,由于呼吸运动和食管蠕动,sBEA的ESD在技术上仍然具有挑战性。目前还没有研究报道sBEA在esd过程中技术难度的预测因素。本研究旨在确定sBEA在静电放电过程中技术难度的预测因素。方法:这项回顾性单中心队列研究纳入了2006年4月至2025年1月期间诊断为sBEA并随后接受了ESDs的患者。排除既往食管切除术、放化疗、分期行周向静电放电或同时切除多个病变的患者。技术难度定义为切除时间≥120分钟、穿孔、治疗不完全或分段切除。进行单因素和多因素逻辑回归分析,以确定技术难度的预测因素。结果:共分析188例199个病灶,其中33个(16.6%)病灶符合技术难度标准。多因素分析发现,长段Barrett食管(LSBE)(校正优势比[OR]: 2.380; 95%可信区间[CI]: 1.010-5.620; p = 0.048)和食管周向累及≥1/2(校正优势比[OR]: 4.460; 95% CI: 1.290-15.400; p = 0.018)是独立的预测因素。这些也与较低的R0切除和负水平切缘率以及较高的esd后狭窄发生率相关。结论:LSBE和≥1/2的食管周向受累被认为是sBEA的ESDs技术难度的重要预测因素。术前对这些因素的认识有助于适当的操作人员分配和操作策略。
{"title":"Predictive Factors for Technical Difficulty During Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Superficial Barrett's Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.","authors":"Koyo Kido, Yusuke Horiuchi, Manabu Takamatsu, Hiroyuki Yamamoto, Chika Fukuyama, Akiyoshi Ishiyama, Toshiaki Hirasawa, Hayato Nakagawa, Toshiyuki Yoshio","doi":"10.1111/jgh.70260","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.70260","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is widely used to treat superficial Barrett's esophageal adenocarcinoma (sBEA) in Japan. However, ESD for sBEA remains technically challenging because of respiratory motion and esophageal peristalsis. No studies have reported predictive factors for technical difficulty during ESDs for sBEA. This study aimed to identify predictive factors for technical difficulty during ESDs for sBEA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective single-center cohort study included patients who were diagnosed with sBEA and subsequently underwent ESDs between April 2006 and January 2025. Patients with previous esophagectomies, chemoradiotherapy, and who underwent staged circumferential ESDs or simultaneous resections of multiple lesions were excluded. Technical difficulty was defined as resection times ≥ 120 min, perforations, incomplete treatment, or piecemeal resections. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the predictive factors for technical difficulty.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 188 patients with 199 lesions were analyzed, and 33 (16.6%) lesions met the criteria for technical difficulty. Multivariate analysis identified long-segment Barrett's esophagus (LSBE) (adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 2.380; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.010-5.620; p = 0.048) and circumferential involvement of ≥ 1/2 of the esophagus (adjusted OR: 4.460; 95% CI: 1.290-15.400; p = 0.018) as independent predictive factors. These were also associated with lower R0 resection and negative horizontal margin rates and a higher incidence of post-ESD strictures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LSBE and circumferential involvement of ≥ 1/2 of the esophagus were identified as significant predictors of technical difficulty in ESDs for sBEA. Preoperative recognition of these factors may facilitate appropriate operator assignment and procedural strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":15877,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146086045","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}