Zachary G. Jacobs MD, FHM, FACP, Michael Rothberg MD, MPH, Thomas E. MacMillan MD, MSc
Patients in the hospital frequently have multiple chronic conditions in addition to their acute illnesses. Inpatient providers may feel pressured to adjust outpatient medication regimens in response to acute variations in labs or vital signs during hospitalization, or in an attempt to optimize long-term disease control. However, this practice should generally be deferred to the outpatient setting, as the effective management of chronic conditions requires longitudinal care and should take place during periods of homeostasis. In select circumstances and for certain high-risk patients, stepwise modifications to chronic disease medications may be considered during hospitalization, but this should always be coordinated with the primary care provider.
{"title":"Point-counterpoint: Should chronic disease medications be adjusted during unrelated hospitalizations?","authors":"Zachary G. Jacobs MD, FHM, FACP, Michael Rothberg MD, MPH, Thomas E. MacMillan MD, MSc","doi":"10.1002/jhm.70143","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jhm.70143","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Patients in the hospital frequently have multiple chronic conditions in addition to their acute illnesses. Inpatient providers may feel pressured to adjust outpatient medication regimens in response to acute variations in labs or vital signs during hospitalization, or in an attempt to optimize long-term disease control. However, this practice should generally be deferred to the outpatient setting, as the effective management of chronic conditions requires longitudinal care and should take place during periods of homeostasis. In select circumstances and for certain high-risk patients, stepwise modifications to chronic disease medications may be considered during hospitalization, but this should always be coordinated with the primary care provider.</p>","PeriodicalId":15883,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hospital medicine","volume":"20 11","pages":"1240-1244"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144762873","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Joseph H. Joo MD, MS, MacKenzie L. Hughes PhD, Wen Hu MS, Jackie Soo ScD, Shriram Parashuram PhD, MPH, Adil Moiduddin MPP, Steven Sheingold PhD, Joshua M. Liao MD, MSc
Care coordination is integral during posthospital transitions. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has sought to promote post-hospitalization care coordination through population-based alternative payment models (APMs) and transitional care management (TCM) services. Both can be associated with benefits, but data are lacking about their overlap. Using 2018–2019 100% Medicare claims, we compared characteristics and quantified overlap across APM and TCM groups. Of 7,034,244 beneficiaries and 11,148,266 discharges, 41.6% were APM-aligned and 14.5% involved TCM. TCM services were received in 19.7% of APM-aligned discharges; among discharges involving TCM, 56.7% occurred among APM-aligned beneficiaries. Relative to non-APM beneficiaries, APM-aligned beneficiaries receiving TCM were less likely to be from historically underserved populations, suggesting potential health disparity concerns. This early descriptive analysis offers novel evidence about TCM and APMs as major national policy investments, highlighting the need for future work on overlap and its effects on care coordination and patient outcomes.
{"title":"Overlap between transitional care management after hospital discharge and alternative payment models","authors":"Joseph H. Joo MD, MS, MacKenzie L. Hughes PhD, Wen Hu MS, Jackie Soo ScD, Shriram Parashuram PhD, MPH, Adil Moiduddin MPP, Steven Sheingold PhD, Joshua M. Liao MD, MSc","doi":"10.1002/jhm.70085","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jhm.70085","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Care coordination is integral during posthospital transitions. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has sought to promote post-hospitalization care coordination through population-based alternative payment models (APMs) and transitional care management (TCM) services. Both can be associated with benefits, but data are lacking about their overlap. Using 2018–2019 100% Medicare claims, we compared characteristics and quantified overlap across APM and TCM groups. Of 7,034,244 beneficiaries and 11,148,266 discharges, 41.6% were APM-aligned and 14.5% involved TCM. TCM services were received in 19.7% of APM-aligned discharges; among discharges involving TCM, 56.7% occurred among APM-aligned beneficiaries. Relative to non-APM beneficiaries, APM-aligned beneficiaries receiving TCM were less likely to be from historically underserved populations, suggesting potential health disparity concerns. This early descriptive analysis offers novel evidence about TCM and APMs as major national policy investments, highlighting the need for future work on overlap and its effects on care coordination and patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":15883,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hospital medicine","volume":"21 1","pages":"59-63"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144984166","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}