首页 > 最新文献

Journal of hospital medicine最新文献

英文 中文
Diagnosis and management of reactive infectious mucocutaneous eruption 反应性感染性皮肤粘膜爆疹的诊断与治疗。
IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2025-07-07 DOI: 10.1002/jhm.70099
Nicole Damari MD, MSc, Abbie Goodman MD, Catherine Bridges MD

Medicine's clinical understanding of reactive infectious mucocutaneous eruption (RIME) has evolved over time. It was previously described as Mycoplasma pneumoniae-induced rash and mucositis (MIRM), and before that as a variant of Stevens-Johnson Syndrome/Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis. Here, we summarize the current understanding of best practices for RIME diagnosis and management.

随着时间的推移,医学对反应性感染性粘膜皮肤疹(RIME)的临床理解不断发展。它以前被描述为肺炎支原体引起的皮疹和粘膜炎(MIRM),在此之前被描述为史蒂文斯-约翰逊综合征/中毒性表皮坏死松解症的一种变体。在这里,我们总结了目前对RIME诊断和管理的最佳实践的理解。
{"title":"Diagnosis and management of reactive infectious mucocutaneous eruption","authors":"Nicole Damari MD, MSc,&nbsp;Abbie Goodman MD,&nbsp;Catherine Bridges MD","doi":"10.1002/jhm.70099","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jhm.70099","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Medicine's clinical understanding of reactive infectious mucocutaneous eruption (RIME) has evolved over time. It was previously described as <i>Mycoplasma pneumoniae</i>-induced rash and mucositis (MIRM), and before that as a variant of Stevens-Johnson Syndrome/Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis. Here, we summarize the current understanding of best practices for RIME diagnosis and management.</p>","PeriodicalId":15883,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hospital medicine","volume":"20 11","pages":"1212-1216"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://shmpublications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jhm.70099","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144577449","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Exploring professional experiences and career insights: A survey of pediatric hospitalists 探索专业经验和职业见解:对儿科医院医生的调查。
IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2025-07-06 DOI: 10.1002/jhm.70117
Juliann L. Kim MD, Catherine S. Forster MD, MS, Jessica M. Allan MD, Amanda Schondelmeyer MD, MSc, Holly Ruch-Ross ScD, Lauren Barone MPH, H. Barrett Fromme MD, MHPE

Background

In medicine, professional experiences and work environment can impact physician satisfaction and well-being. Little is known about these experiences in pediatric hospital medicine.

Objective

The objective of this study was to examine self-reported factors associated with professional experience, career development, and career satisfaction, and to compare aspects of these domains between men and women.

Methods

This was a cross-sectional survey study of 1096 pediatric hospitalists performed in 2021. Our survey tool included novel and previously published questions. Responses were collected via an online survey platform and summarized using descriptive statistics, including frequency distributions and measures of central tendency. A multivariable logistic regression was used to examine associations between variables and career satisfaction.

Results

Five hundred and sixty-five respondents (52.3% response rate) completed the survey with 70.6% women. Over three-quarters (77.4%) reported career satisfaction, and 71.9% would choose Pediatric Hospital Medicine (PHM) again. Work-life balance was positively associated with career satisfaction, while perception of gender-specific bias decreased career satisfaction. Satisfaction with mentoring was reported by 88% of respondents with a mentor. Positive aspects of professional experience included peer relationships and support. However, 29.7% experienced gender discrimination, 26.5% were treated with disrespect by colleagues, and 40% perceived gender biases in the professional environment—women more than men on most measures.

Conclusion

Satisfaction with career, peer relationships, and mentoring was high; however, opportunities to improve the professional experience exist, including addressing potential mentorship gaps and discrimination. This study adds insights into career satisfaction in PHM.

背景:在医学中,专业经验和工作环境会影响医生的满意度和幸福感。我们对儿科医院的这些经验知之甚少。目的:本研究的目的是考察与职业经验、职业发展和职业满意度相关的自我报告因素,并比较男性和女性在这些领域的各个方面。方法:这是一项对2021年1096名儿科医院医生进行的横断面调查研究。我们的调查工具包括新的和以前发表的问题。通过在线调查平台收集反馈,并使用描述性统计(包括频率分布和集中趋势测量)进行汇总。采用多变量逻辑回归来检验变量与职业满意度之间的关系。结果:共有565名受访者(52.3%)完成调查,其中70.6%为女性。超过四分之三(77.4%)的人对职业满意,71.9%的人会再次选择儿科医院医学(PHM)。工作与生活的平衡与职业满意度呈正相关,而性别偏见的感知会降低职业满意度。有导师的受访者中,88%的人对导师的指导感到满意。专业经验的积极方面包括同伴关系和支持。然而,29.7%的人经历过性别歧视,26.5%的人受到同事的不尊重,40%的人在职业环境中感受到性别偏见——女性在大多数方面都比男性多。结论:大学生对职业、同伴关系和师徒关系的满意度较高;然而,改善专业经验的机会是存在的,包括解决潜在的指导差距和歧视。本研究增加了对PHM职业满意度的认识。
{"title":"Exploring professional experiences and career insights: A survey of pediatric hospitalists","authors":"Juliann L. Kim MD,&nbsp;Catherine S. Forster MD, MS,&nbsp;Jessica M. Allan MD,&nbsp;Amanda Schondelmeyer MD, MSc,&nbsp;Holly Ruch-Ross ScD,&nbsp;Lauren Barone MPH,&nbsp;H. Barrett Fromme MD, MHPE","doi":"10.1002/jhm.70117","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jhm.70117","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>In medicine, professional experiences and work environment can impact physician satisfaction and well-being. Little is known about these experiences in pediatric hospital medicine.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objective</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The objective of this study was to examine self-reported factors associated with professional experience, career development, and career satisfaction, and to compare aspects of these domains between men and women.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This was a cross-sectional survey study of 1096 pediatric hospitalists performed in 2021. Our survey tool included novel and previously published questions. Responses were collected via an online survey platform and summarized using descriptive statistics, including frequency distributions and measures of central tendency. A multivariable logistic regression was used to examine associations between variables and career satisfaction.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Five hundred and sixty-five respondents (52.3% response rate) completed the survey with 70.6% women. Over three-quarters (77.4%) reported career satisfaction, and 71.9% would choose Pediatric Hospital Medicine (PHM) again. Work-life balance was positively associated with career satisfaction, while perception of gender-specific bias decreased career satisfaction. Satisfaction with mentoring was reported by 88% of respondents with a mentor. Positive aspects of professional experience included peer relationships and support. However, 29.7% experienced gender discrimination, 26.5% were treated with disrespect by colleagues, and 40% perceived gender biases in the professional environment—women more than men on most measures.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Satisfaction with career, peer relationships, and mentoring was high; however, opportunities to improve the professional experience exist, including addressing potential mentorship gaps and discrimination. This study adds insights into career satisfaction in PHM.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":15883,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hospital medicine","volume":"21 1","pages":"16-26"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144577450","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Defusing disruption: A rapid qualitative analysis examining hospitalist experiences navigating behavioral escalation events 消除干扰:快速定性分析检查医院医生的经验导航行为升级事件。
IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2025-07-03 DOI: 10.1002/jhm.70121
Courtney Enix MD, Angela Keniston PhD, MSPH, Ashley Jenkins MD, MSc, Claire Westcott PA, Kristin Furfari MD, Sneha Daya MD, Jeffrey L. Schnipper MD, MPH, Andrew Auerbach MD, MPH, Katie E. Raffel MD

Background

Behavioral escalation events have become commonplace in the acute care setting. Disruptive patient behaviors contribute to workplace injuries and can compromise patient care and safety. Despite frequently encountering behavioral escalation, limited research exists on hospitalists' practices and perspectives when addressing disruptive behaviors.

Objective

To explore hospitalists' experiences and perspectives when navigating behavioral escalation events in adult acute care settings.

Methods

We conducted a rapid qualitative study on February 10, 2023, with four semi-structured virtual focus groups involving 27 hospital medicine participants across 19 US hospitals via the Hospital Medicine Reengineering Network (HOMERuN). Discussions examined hospitalist experiences with behavioral escalation and perspectives on response strategies.

Results

Our rapid qualitative study identified four key themes. (1) Many hospitals lack strategies to identify patients or situations at risk of behavioral escalation. (2) Interdisciplinary collaboration is considered essential, yet dedicated response teams are often unavailable. (3) Lack of standardized approaches to disruptive behaviors and inadequate hospitalist training in de-escalation may lead to varied responses. (4) Limited proactive measures to anticipate escalation and inconsistent use of EHR behavioral alerts may unintentionally stigmatize patients.

Conclusion

Behavioral escalation events in the acute care setting pose significant risks to patient and staff safety while disrupting healthcare delivery. Participants highlighted limited strategies to anticipate behavioral escalation, inconsistent interdisciplinary team response structures, and minimal opportunity for debriefing or event review. Focus groups emphasized the need for systems that support team-based de-escalation training and incorporate bias and equity considerations into behavioral response practices.

背景:行为升级事件已成为司空见惯的急症护理设置。破坏性的患者行为会导致工作场所伤害,并可能危及患者护理和安全。尽管经常遇到行为升级,但在解决破坏性行为时,对医院医生的实践和观点的研究有限。目的:探讨医院医生在处理成人急症护理中行为升级事件时的经验和观点。方法:我们于2023年2月10日进行了一项快速定性研究,通过医院医学再造网络(HOMERuN)对19家美国医院的27名医院医学参与者进行了四个半结构化虚拟焦点小组的研究。讨论检查了行为升级的医院经验和对反应策略的看法。结果:我们的快速定性研究确定了四个关键主题。(1)许多医院缺乏识别有行为升级风险的患者或情况的策略。(2)跨学科合作被认为是必不可少的,但专门的响应团队往往不可用。(3)缺乏对破坏性行为的标准化方法和不充分的医院医生降级培训可能导致不同的反应。(4)有限的前瞻性措施,以预测升级和不一致的使用电子病历行为警报可能无意中使患者污名化。结论:急性护理环境中的行为升级事件在扰乱医疗服务的同时对患者和工作人员的安全构成重大风险。参与者强调了预测行为升级的有限策略,不一致的跨学科团队反应结构,以及汇报或事件回顾的最小机会。焦点小组强调需要建立支持以团队为基础的降级培训的系统,并将偏见和公平考虑纳入行为反应实践。
{"title":"Defusing disruption: A rapid qualitative analysis examining hospitalist experiences navigating behavioral escalation events","authors":"Courtney Enix MD,&nbsp;Angela Keniston PhD, MSPH,&nbsp;Ashley Jenkins MD, MSc,&nbsp;Claire Westcott PA,&nbsp;Kristin Furfari MD,&nbsp;Sneha Daya MD,&nbsp;Jeffrey L. Schnipper MD, MPH,&nbsp;Andrew Auerbach MD, MPH,&nbsp;Katie E. Raffel MD","doi":"10.1002/jhm.70121","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jhm.70121","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Behavioral escalation events have become commonplace in the acute care setting. Disruptive patient behaviors contribute to workplace injuries and can compromise patient care and safety. Despite frequently encountering behavioral escalation, limited research exists on hospitalists' practices and perspectives when addressing disruptive behaviors.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objective</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>To explore hospitalists' experiences and perspectives when navigating behavioral escalation events in adult acute care settings.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We conducted a rapid qualitative study on February 10, 2023, with four semi-structured virtual focus groups involving 27 hospital medicine participants across 19 US hospitals via the Hospital Medicine Reengineering Network (HOMERuN). Discussions examined hospitalist experiences with behavioral escalation and perspectives on response strategies.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Our rapid qualitative study identified four key themes. (1) Many hospitals lack strategies to identify patients or situations at risk of behavioral escalation. (2) Interdisciplinary collaboration is considered essential, yet dedicated response teams are often unavailable. (3) Lack of standardized approaches to disruptive behaviors and inadequate hospitalist training in de-escalation may lead to varied responses. (4) Limited proactive measures to anticipate escalation and inconsistent use of EHR behavioral alerts may unintentionally stigmatize patients.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Behavioral escalation events in the acute care setting pose significant risks to patient and staff safety while disrupting healthcare delivery. Participants highlighted limited strategies to anticipate behavioral escalation, inconsistent interdisciplinary team response structures, and minimal opportunity for debriefing or event review. Focus groups emphasized the need for systems that support team-based de-escalation training and incorporate bias and equity considerations into behavioral response practices.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":15883,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hospital medicine","volume":"20 9","pages":"963-970"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144562445","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Caregiver experiences with deimplementation of continuous pulse oximetry monitoring for children hospitalized with bronchiolitis: A qualitative study 护理人员对毛细支气管炎住院儿童停用连续脉搏血氧仪监测的经验:一项定性研究。
IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2025-07-03 DOI: 10.1002/jhm.70123
Courtney Benjamin Wolk PhD, Caroline S. O'Brien MS, Christopher Bonafide MD, MSCE, Rinad S. Beidas PhD, Enrique F. Schisterman PhD, Kimberly Albanowski MA, Canita Brent MPH, Amanda C. Schondelmeyer MD, MSc

Background

Continuous pulse oximetry monitoring in stable children with bronchiolitis not requiring supplemental oxygen has been identified as a low-value practice. However, little is known about how parents and other caregivers experience efforts to deimplement this practice.

Objectives

This study investigated caregivers' experiences during their child's recent hospitalization for bronchiolitis on units involved in a deimplementation trial.

Methods

We conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with 15 caregivers of children hospitalized with bronchiolitis at 11 hospitals participating in deimplementation strategies to reduce unnecessary continuous pulse oximetry monitoring as part of the Eliminating Monitoring Overuse (EMO) trial. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and coded using an integrative analytic approach.

Results

Caregivers were a mean (SD) 31.1 (5.7) years old, predominantly female (93.3%), white (73.3%), and Non-Hispanic (86.7%). Previous hospitalization experiences and prior knowledge and training influenced caregiver perceptions of the value of monitoring. Participants did not discuss noticing changes in monitoring practices in interviews.

Conclusions

Findings suggest that tailored education about monitoring may lessen caregiver concerns.

背景:在不需要补充氧气的稳定毛细支气管炎患儿中,连续脉搏血氧监测被认为是一种低价值的做法。然而,对于父母和其他照顾者如何努力废除这一做法,人们知之甚少。目的:本研究调查了护理人员在其孩子最近因毛细支气管炎住院期间的经历,参与了一项实施试验。方法:我们对11家医院的15名毛细支气管炎住院儿童的护理人员进行了半结构化定性访谈,这些护理人员参与了减少不必要的连续脉搏血氧仪监测的实施策略,作为消除监测过度使用(EMO)试验的一部分。访谈采用综合分析方法进行记录、转录和编码。结果:照顾者平均(SD)为31.1(5.7)岁,主要为女性(93.3%)、白人(73.3%)和非西班牙裔(86.7%)。以前的住院经历和先前的知识和培训影响照顾者对监测价值的看法。参与者没有在访谈中讨论注意到监控实践的变化。结论:研究结果表明,量身定制的监护教育可以减轻护理人员的担忧。
{"title":"Caregiver experiences with deimplementation of continuous pulse oximetry monitoring for children hospitalized with bronchiolitis: A qualitative study","authors":"Courtney Benjamin Wolk PhD,&nbsp;Caroline S. O'Brien MS,&nbsp;Christopher Bonafide MD, MSCE,&nbsp;Rinad S. Beidas PhD,&nbsp;Enrique F. Schisterman PhD,&nbsp;Kimberly Albanowski MA,&nbsp;Canita Brent MPH,&nbsp;Amanda C. Schondelmeyer MD, MSc","doi":"10.1002/jhm.70123","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jhm.70123","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Continuous pulse oximetry monitoring in stable children with bronchiolitis not requiring supplemental oxygen has been identified as a low-value practice. However, little is known about how parents and other caregivers experience efforts to deimplement this practice.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objectives</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This study investigated caregivers' experiences during their child's recent hospitalization for bronchiolitis on units involved in a deimplementation trial.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with 15 caregivers of children hospitalized with bronchiolitis at 11 hospitals participating in deimplementation strategies to reduce unnecessary continuous pulse oximetry monitoring as part of the Eliminating Monitoring Overuse (EMO) trial. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and coded using an integrative analytic approach.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Caregivers were a mean (SD) 31.1 (5.7) years old, predominantly female (93.3%), white (73.3%), and Non-Hispanic (86.7%). Previous hospitalization experiences and prior knowledge and training influenced caregiver perceptions of the value of monitoring. Participants did not discuss noticing changes in monitoring practices in interviews.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Findings suggest that tailored education about monitoring may lessen caregiver concerns.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":15883,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hospital medicine","volume":"21 1","pages":"27-33"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12240481/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144562444","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Posthospitalization telemedicine follow-up and 30-day readmission across the COVID-19 era: A multiphase analysis in a large integrated healthcare system 2019冠状病毒病疫情时期住院后远程医疗随访和30天再入院:大型综合医疗系统的多阶段分析
IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2025-07-03 DOI: 10.1002/jhm.70109
Michael S. Yoo MD, Lawrence S. Block MPH, MPA, Lue-Yen Tucker BA, Julia Wei MPH, Kawai Cheung MD, Mary E. Reed DrPH

Background

Timely postdischarge visits reduce readmissions, but the impact of telemedicine follow-up remains unclear. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic rapidly expanded telemedicine, offering a unique opportunity to assess its impact on outcomes.

Objectives

Evaluate the association between telemedicine versus in-person follow-up and 30-day outcomes before, during, and after the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods

Retrospective cohort study of adults discharged from the Medicine Service across 21 hospitals (2017–2023). Telemedicine (video/telephone) versus in-person visits within 7 days of discharge were compared. The primary outcome was 30-day nonelective readmission. Secondary outcomes included 30-day all-cause readmission, emergency department (ED) visits, and mortality. Competing risk and Cox regression models were used, with inverse probability of treatment weighting to address differences.

Results

Among 137,765 patients (mean age 67.5 years, 49.1% female), 59.2% received telemedicine follow-up. Pre-pandemic, 28.2% had telemedicine visits, associated with higher 30-day nonelective readmission risk (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 1.23, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.19–1.28, p < .01) and mortality (aHR: 1.87, 95% CI: 1.71–2.05, p < .01). During COVID-19, telemedicine was associated with lower nonelective readmission risk (aHR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.88–0.97, p < .01), fewer ED visits (aHR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.84–0.92, p < .01), and no difference in mortality (aHR: 1.10, 95% CI: 0.98–1.24, p = .11). Post-COVID-19, readmission and ED visit risks were similar, though mortality was higher in the telemedicine group (aHR: 1.33, 95% CI: 1.20–1.49, p < .01).

Conclusions

Telemedicine follow-up was associated with favorable outcomes during the pandemic, supporting its use as an alternative to in-person care. Pre- and postpandemic differences likely reflect patient selection. A hybrid follow-up model may optimize access and outcomes in postdischarge care.

背景:及时的出院后就诊减少再入院,但远程医疗随访的影响尚不清楚。2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行迅速扩大了远程医疗,为评估其对结果的影响提供了一个独特的机会。目的:评估远程医疗与现场随访与COVID-19大流行之前、期间和之后30天结果之间的关系。方法:回顾性队列研究21家医院(2017-2023年)医学服务部门出院成人。对出院后7天内的远程医疗(视频/电话)和亲自就诊进行比较。主要终点为30天非选择性再入院。次要结局包括30天全因再入院、急诊科(ED)就诊和死亡率。采用竞争风险和Cox回归模型,采用逆概率处理权重来解决差异。结果:137,765例患者(平均年龄67.5岁,女性49.1%)中,59.2%的患者接受了远程医疗随访。大流行前,28.2%的人有过远程医疗就诊,与较高的30天非选择性再入院风险相关(调整风险比[aHR]: 1.23, 95%置信区间[CI]: 1.19-1.28, p)。结论:大流行期间,远程医疗随访与良好的结果相关,支持将其作为面对面护理的替代方案。大流行前后的差异可能反映了患者的选择。混合随访模型可以优化出院后护理的可及性和结果。
{"title":"Posthospitalization telemedicine follow-up and 30-day readmission across the COVID-19 era: A multiphase analysis in a large integrated healthcare system","authors":"Michael S. Yoo MD,&nbsp;Lawrence S. Block MPH, MPA,&nbsp;Lue-Yen Tucker BA,&nbsp;Julia Wei MPH,&nbsp;Kawai Cheung MD,&nbsp;Mary E. Reed DrPH","doi":"10.1002/jhm.70109","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jhm.70109","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Timely postdischarge visits reduce readmissions, but the impact of telemedicine follow-up remains unclear. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic rapidly expanded telemedicine, offering a unique opportunity to assess its impact on outcomes.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objectives</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Evaluate the association between telemedicine versus in-person follow-up and 30-day outcomes before, during, and after the COVID-19 pandemic.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Retrospective cohort study of adults discharged from the Medicine Service across 21 hospitals (2017–2023). Telemedicine (video/telephone) versus in-person visits within 7 days of discharge were compared. The primary outcome was 30-day nonelective readmission. Secondary outcomes included 30-day all-cause readmission, emergency department (ED) visits, and mortality. Competing risk and Cox regression models were used, with inverse probability of treatment weighting to address differences.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Among 137,765 patients (mean age 67.5 years, 49.1% female), 59.2% received telemedicine follow-up. Pre-pandemic, 28.2% had telemedicine visits, associated with higher 30-day nonelective readmission risk (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 1.23, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.19–1.28, <i>p</i> &lt; .01) and mortality (aHR: 1.87, 95% CI: 1.71–2.05, <i>p</i> &lt; .01). During COVID-19, telemedicine was associated with lower nonelective readmission risk (aHR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.88–0.97, <i>p</i> &lt; .01), fewer ED visits (aHR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.84–0.92, <i>p</i> &lt; .01), and no difference in mortality (aHR: 1.10, 95% CI: 0.98–1.24, <i>p</i> = .11). Post-COVID-19, readmission and ED visit risks were similar, though mortality was higher in the telemedicine group (aHR: 1.33, 95% CI: 1.20–1.49, <i>p</i> &lt; .01).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Telemedicine follow-up was associated with favorable outcomes during the pandemic, supporting its use as an alternative to in-person care. Pre- and postpandemic differences likely reflect patient selection. A hybrid follow-up model may optimize access and outcomes in postdischarge care.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":15883,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hospital medicine","volume":"21 1","pages":"7-15"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144556284","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Building vaccine confidence through empathy and evidence-based communication 通过同情和基于证据的沟通建立疫苗信心。
IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2025-07-02 DOI: 10.1002/jhm.70116
Paul G. Mitchell MD, Elizabeth Adrianne Hammershaimb MD, MS, Jessica R. Cataldi MD, MSCS

With a resurgence of vaccine-preventable diseases and increasing vaccine disinformation, vaccine hesitancy is a serious threat to public health around the world. Through an empathetic approach to vaccine conversations, sharing a strong recommendation, and using strategies like motivational interviewing, clinicians can partner with patients and families to improve vaccine confidence. Extending evidence-based approaches to vaccine communication and immunization delivery across patient populations can improve vaccination coverage from infancy through old age. Talking about and administering vaccines in hospital settings expands opportunities to address vaccine hesitancy and increase vaccination uptake.

随着疫苗可预防疾病的死灰复燃和疫苗虚假信息的增加,疫苗犹豫对世界各地的公共卫生构成严重威胁。通过同理心的方式进行疫苗对话,分享强有力的建议,并使用动机性访谈等策略,临床医生可以与患者和家属合作,提高疫苗信心。在患者人群中推广以证据为基础的疫苗传播和免疫接种方法,可以提高从婴儿期到老年的疫苗接种覆盖率。在医院环境中讨论和管理疫苗扩大了解决疫苗犹豫和提高疫苗接种率的机会。
{"title":"Building vaccine confidence through empathy and evidence-based communication","authors":"Paul G. Mitchell MD,&nbsp;Elizabeth Adrianne Hammershaimb MD, MS,&nbsp;Jessica R. Cataldi MD, MSCS","doi":"10.1002/jhm.70116","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jhm.70116","url":null,"abstract":"<p>With a resurgence of vaccine-preventable diseases and increasing vaccine disinformation, vaccine hesitancy is a serious threat to public health around the world. Through an empathetic approach to vaccine conversations, sharing a strong recommendation, and using strategies like motivational interviewing, clinicians can partner with patients and families to improve vaccine confidence. Extending evidence-based approaches to vaccine communication and immunization delivery across patient populations can improve vaccination coverage from infancy through old age. Talking about and administering vaccines in hospital settings expands opportunities to address vaccine hesitancy and increase vaccination uptake.</p>","PeriodicalId":15883,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hospital medicine","volume":"20 12","pages":"1342-1347"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144556283","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Things We Do for No Reason™: Teach caregivers reflux precautions 我们做的事情没有理由™:教护理人员反流预防措施。
IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2025-07-01 DOI: 10.1002/jhm.70108
Abbye Degan MD, Jamee Walters MD

To decrease symptoms of physiological infant reflux, nonpharmacological techniques named “reflux precautions” are taught to families. Reflux precautions do not have a universal definition but can include burping, holding an infant upright pre- and postfeed, smaller and more frequent feedings, and elevating the head of the bed. Despite a lack of consensus on what constitutes reflux precautions, and a paucity of research, physicians and other providers continue to recommend them. In recommending reflux precautions, we pathologize normal physiology, sending mixed messages to families. Routine recommendation of reflux precautions for infant reflux is a Thing We Do for No Reason™.

为了减少婴儿生理性反流的症状,向家庭传授了名为“反流预防”的非药物技术。反流预防措施没有一个通用的定义,但可以包括打嗝、在喂食前后让婴儿直立、喂奶次数少、喂奶次数多、抬高床头。尽管对什么是反流预防措施缺乏共识,并且缺乏研究,医生和其他提供者继续推荐它们。在推荐反流预防措施时,我们将正常生理病理化,向家属传递了复杂的信息。对婴儿反流预防措施的常规建议是一件我们没有理由做的事情。
{"title":"Things We Do for No Reason™: Teach caregivers reflux precautions","authors":"Abbye Degan MD,&nbsp;Jamee Walters MD","doi":"10.1002/jhm.70108","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jhm.70108","url":null,"abstract":"<p>To decrease symptoms of physiological infant reflux, nonpharmacological techniques named “reflux precautions” are taught to families. Reflux precautions do not have a universal definition but can include burping, holding an infant upright pre- and postfeed, smaller and more frequent feedings, and elevating the head of the bed. Despite a lack of consensus on what constitutes reflux precautions, and a paucity of research, physicians and other providers continue to recommend them. In recommending reflux precautions, we pathologize normal physiology, sending mixed messages to families. Routine recommendation of reflux precautions for infant reflux is a Thing We Do for No Reason™.</p>","PeriodicalId":15883,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hospital medicine","volume":"20 11","pages":"1223-1225"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144546587","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Expanding internal medicine board eligibility for international medical graduates in the United States 扩大国际医学毕业生在美国的内科委员会资格。
IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2025-06-30 DOI: 10.1002/jhm.70120
Tarun Ramesh MD, Kushal Kadakia MD, Hao Yu PhD

{"title":"Expanding internal medicine board eligibility for international medical graduates in the United States","authors":"Tarun Ramesh MD,&nbsp;Kushal Kadakia MD,&nbsp;Hao Yu PhD","doi":"10.1002/jhm.70120","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jhm.70120","url":null,"abstract":"<p>\u0000 <figure>\u0000 <div><picture>\u0000 <source></source></picture><p></p>\u0000 </div>\u0000 </figure></p>","PeriodicalId":15883,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hospital medicine","volume":"20 12","pages":"1362-1364"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144532005","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reducing (begrudgingly appropriate) interhospital transfers 减少(勉强适当的)医院间转诊。
IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2025-06-29 DOI: 10.1002/jhm.70119
Mary S. Vaughan Sarrazin PhD, Michael E. Ohl MD
{"title":"Reducing (begrudgingly appropriate) interhospital transfers","authors":"Mary S. Vaughan Sarrazin PhD,&nbsp;Michael E. Ohl MD","doi":"10.1002/jhm.70119","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jhm.70119","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15883,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hospital medicine","volume":"20 12","pages":"1369-1370"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144532006","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Towards resiliency in the US healthcare supply chain 实现美国医疗保健供应链的弹性。
IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2025-06-29 DOI: 10.1002/jhm.70112
Kevin A. Schulman MD, Wasan Kumar BS, Neera Ahuja MD
{"title":"Towards resiliency in the US healthcare supply chain","authors":"Kevin A. Schulman MD,&nbsp;Wasan Kumar BS,&nbsp;Neera Ahuja MD","doi":"10.1002/jhm.70112","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jhm.70112","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15883,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hospital medicine","volume":"20 12","pages":"1359-1361"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144532008","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of hospital medicine
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1