首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer最新文献

英文 中文
Predicting Tumor Regrowth in Patients Undergoing Non-Operative Management after Total Neoadjuvant Therapy. 预测全新辅助治疗后非手术治疗患者的肿瘤再生。
IF 1.6 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-03 DOI: 10.1007/s12029-025-01342-5
Kamil Erozkan, Emily Simon, Emily Steinhagen, Lauren Henke, Meagan Costedio, Jennifer Eva Selfridge, Satish E Viswanath, Ronald Charles

Introduction: Total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT) has become the standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), leading to increased rates of complete clinical response and expanding the potential for organ preservation through non-operative management (NOM) protocols. Despite these advances, tumor regrowth remains a concern, necessitating vigilant surveillance to ensure early detection. However, adherence to surveillance protocols is often suboptimal, and the factors influencing tumor regrowth during NOM have not been well defined. This study aims to identify predictors of tumor regrowth in patients undergoing NOM after TNT.

Method: We conducted a retrospective review of patients with LARC who completed TNT at a single institution between 2019 and 2024. Patients who achieved sustained complete clinical response (cCR) for at least 12 months, as well as those who experienced tumor regrowth following cCR, were included. Patients with suspected regrowth who subsequently underwent surgery and were found to have a pathologic complete response (pCR) were excluded. Univariate analyses were performed to compare demographic, histopathologic, biochemical, clinical, radiological, and treatment-related factors between patients who experienced tumor regrowth and those who did not. The primary objective of our study was to identify predictors of tumor regrowth.

Results: Among 137 patients with LARC, 44 patients (32.1%) achieved cCR following completion of TNT. Of these, 10 patients experienced tumor regrowth and subsequently underwent surgery, with histopathology revealing a pCR in 2 cases. Currently, 11 patients remain in their first year of NOM, and 3 patients were lost to follow-up. In total, 20 patients sustained cCR. A total of 28 patients (25% female) with a mean age of 62.4 years (± 13) were included in the univariate analysis. No statistically significant differences were observed in demographic, histopathologic, biochemical, clinical, radiological, or treatment-related factors between patients who experienced tumor regrowth and those who did not (Table 1).

Conclusion: This study did not identify any predictors of tumor regrowth in patients undergoing NOM after TNT. The limited number of events severely restricted the power to detect statistically meaningful associations. Nevertheless, this area warrants further investigation to better tailor surveillance strategies and optimize NOM recommendations.

导论:全面新辅助治疗(TNT)已经成为局部晚期直肠癌(LARC)的标准治疗方法,导致临床完全缓解率的提高,并通过非手术管理(NOM)方案扩大了器官保存的潜力。尽管取得了这些进展,但肿瘤再生仍然是一个问题,需要警惕监测以确保早期发现。然而,对监测方案的依从性往往不是最佳的,并且在NOM期间影响肿瘤再生的因素尚未得到很好的定义。本研究旨在确定TNT术后NOM患者肿瘤再生的预测因素。方法:我们对2019年至2024年间在单一机构完成TNT治疗的LARC患者进行回顾性分析。达到持续完全临床缓解(cCR)至少12个月的患者,以及在cCR后经历肿瘤再生的患者被纳入研究。随后进行手术并发现病理完全缓解(pCR)的疑似再生患者被排除在外。进行单变量分析,比较经历肿瘤再生的患者和没有经历肿瘤再生的患者的人口学、组织病理学、生化、临床、放射学和治疗相关因素。我们研究的主要目的是确定肿瘤再生的预测因素。结果:137例LARC患者中,44例(32.1%)在TNT完成后达到cCR。其中,10例患者出现肿瘤再生并随后进行手术,组织病理学显示2例出现pCR。目前,11例患者仍处于NOM的第一年,3例患者未随访。总共有20例患者持续cCR。单因素分析共纳入28例患者(25%为女性),平均年龄62.4岁(±13岁)。在经历肿瘤再生的患者和没有经历肿瘤再生的患者之间,在人口统计学、组织病理学、生化、临床、放射学或治疗相关因素方面没有观察到统计学上的显著差异(表1)。结论:本研究未发现任何预测TNT术后NOM患者肿瘤再生的因素。有限的事件数量严重限制了检测统计上有意义的关联的能力。然而,这一领域值得进一步调查,以更好地制定监测战略并优化NOM建议。
{"title":"Predicting Tumor Regrowth in Patients Undergoing Non-Operative Management after Total Neoadjuvant Therapy.","authors":"Kamil Erozkan, Emily Simon, Emily Steinhagen, Lauren Henke, Meagan Costedio, Jennifer Eva Selfridge, Satish E Viswanath, Ronald Charles","doi":"10.1007/s12029-025-01342-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12029-025-01342-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT) has become the standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), leading to increased rates of complete clinical response and expanding the potential for organ preservation through non-operative management (NOM) protocols. Despite these advances, tumor regrowth remains a concern, necessitating vigilant surveillance to ensure early detection. However, adherence to surveillance protocols is often suboptimal, and the factors influencing tumor regrowth during NOM have not been well defined. This study aims to identify predictors of tumor regrowth in patients undergoing NOM after TNT.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted a retrospective review of patients with LARC who completed TNT at a single institution between 2019 and 2024. Patients who achieved sustained complete clinical response (cCR) for at least 12 months, as well as those who experienced tumor regrowth following cCR, were included. Patients with suspected regrowth who subsequently underwent surgery and were found to have a pathologic complete response (pCR) were excluded. Univariate analyses were performed to compare demographic, histopathologic, biochemical, clinical, radiological, and treatment-related factors between patients who experienced tumor regrowth and those who did not. The primary objective of our study was to identify predictors of tumor regrowth.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 137 patients with LARC, 44 patients (32.1%) achieved cCR following completion of TNT. Of these, 10 patients experienced tumor regrowth and subsequently underwent surgery, with histopathology revealing a pCR in 2 cases. Currently, 11 patients remain in their first year of NOM, and 3 patients were lost to follow-up. In total, 20 patients sustained cCR. A total of 28 patients (25% female) with a mean age of 62.4 years (± 13) were included in the univariate analysis. No statistically significant differences were observed in demographic, histopathologic, biochemical, clinical, radiological, or treatment-related factors between patients who experienced tumor regrowth and those who did not (Table 1).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study did not identify any predictors of tumor regrowth in patients undergoing NOM after TNT. The limited number of events severely restricted the power to detect statistically meaningful associations. Nevertheless, this area warrants further investigation to better tailor surveillance strategies and optimize NOM recommendations.</p>","PeriodicalId":15895,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer","volume":"56 1","pages":"212"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12583335/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145438240","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Higher Risk of Liver Cancer in Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease than in Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: an Analysis of the TriNetX Dabatase. 酒精性脂肪性肝病的肝癌风险高于非酒精性脂肪性肝病:TriNetX数据库的分析
IF 1.6 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-10-31 DOI: 10.1007/s12029-025-01340-7
Ling-Hui Chang, Sheng-You Su, Chun Lee, Chao-Yu Hsu

Background: Both alcohol fatty liver disease (AFLD) and non-alcohol fatty liver disease (NAFLD) are established risk factors for liver cancer development. We conduct a comparative analysis between AFLD and NAFLD to determine which condition contributes a greater burden to liver cancer incidence.

Methods: Data were obtained from the TriNetX research network. Individuals aged ≥ 20 years with newly diagnosed fatty liver disease between 2008 and 2021 were included. Participants were categorized into two groups: AFLD and NAFLD. Patients with a history of hepatic cirrhosis, liver cancer, hepatitis B, or hepatitis C before the index date were excluded. Propensity score matching was performed based on age, sex, and comorbidities, resulting in a balanced 1:1 matched cohort. Comparative analyses were conducted between the AFLD and NAFLD cohorts to assess differences in liver cancer risk profiles.

Results: A total of 13,998 AFLD and 1,165,365 NAFLD cases were analyzed. After propensity score matching, both cohorts consist of 13,998 individuals. At the 2- and 3-year follow-ups, the risk became statistically significant and showed a progressive increase, with relative risks approaching a two-fold elevation in the AFLD group. Cumulatively, by the final follow-up, AFLD patients demonstrated a markedly higher incidence of liver cancer (0.950% vs. 0.493%), confirming a sustained and significantly elevated risk even after adjustment for baseline characteristics.

Conclusion: Patients with AFLD exhibited an approximately two-fold increased risk of liver cancer development over a 3-year follow-up period compared to those with NAFLD. This finding underscores the urgent need for comprehensive recognition and mitigation of alcohol-associated hepatocarcinogenesis.

背景:酒精性脂肪性肝病(AFLD)和非酒精性脂肪性肝病(NAFLD)都是肝癌发展的危险因素。我们对AFLD和NAFLD进行了比较分析,以确定哪种情况对肝癌发病率的影响更大。方法:数据来自TriNetX研究网络。纳入了2008年至2021年间年龄≥20岁新诊断为脂肪肝的个体。参与者分为两组:AFLD和NAFLD。排除索引日期前有肝硬化、肝癌、乙型肝炎或丙型肝炎病史的患者。根据年龄、性别和合并症进行倾向评分匹配,形成平衡的1:1匹配队列。在AFLD组和NAFLD组之间进行了比较分析,以评估肝癌风险概况的差异。结果:共分析NAFLD 13998例,分析NAFLD 1165365例。在倾向得分匹配后,两个队列由13,998个人组成。在2年和3年的随访中,风险变得具有统计学意义,并呈渐进式增加,AFLD组的相对风险接近两倍。累积起来,到最后随访时,AFLD患者表现出明显更高的肝癌发病率(0.950%对0.493%),即使在调整基线特征后,也证实了持续且显著升高的风险。结论:与NAFLD患者相比,AFLD患者在3年随访期间发生肝癌的风险增加了约两倍。这一发现强调了全面认识和缓解酒精相关肝癌发生的迫切需要。
{"title":"A Higher Risk of Liver Cancer in Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease than in Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: an Analysis of the TriNetX Dabatase.","authors":"Ling-Hui Chang, Sheng-You Su, Chun Lee, Chao-Yu Hsu","doi":"10.1007/s12029-025-01340-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-025-01340-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Both alcohol fatty liver disease (AFLD) and non-alcohol fatty liver disease (NAFLD) are established risk factors for liver cancer development. We conduct a comparative analysis between AFLD and NAFLD to determine which condition contributes a greater burden to liver cancer incidence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were obtained from the TriNetX research network. Individuals aged ≥ 20 years with newly diagnosed fatty liver disease between 2008 and 2021 were included. Participants were categorized into two groups: AFLD and NAFLD. Patients with a history of hepatic cirrhosis, liver cancer, hepatitis B, or hepatitis C before the index date were excluded. Propensity score matching was performed based on age, sex, and comorbidities, resulting in a balanced 1:1 matched cohort. Comparative analyses were conducted between the AFLD and NAFLD cohorts to assess differences in liver cancer risk profiles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 13,998 AFLD and 1,165,365 NAFLD cases were analyzed. After propensity score matching, both cohorts consist of 13,998 individuals. At the 2- and 3-year follow-ups, the risk became statistically significant and showed a progressive increase, with relative risks approaching a two-fold elevation in the AFLD group. Cumulatively, by the final follow-up, AFLD patients demonstrated a markedly higher incidence of liver cancer (0.950% vs. 0.493%), confirming a sustained and significantly elevated risk even after adjustment for baseline characteristics.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with AFLD exhibited an approximately two-fold increased risk of liver cancer development over a 3-year follow-up period compared to those with NAFLD. This finding underscores the urgent need for comprehensive recognition and mitigation of alcohol-associated hepatocarcinogenesis.</p>","PeriodicalId":15895,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer","volume":"56 1","pages":"211"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145421949","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reducing AL After Double-Stapling Anastomosis: A Novel Laparoscopic Technique for Dog Ear Area Resection. 双吻合器吻合后减少AL:一种新的腹腔镜犬耳切除技术。
IF 1.6 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-10-28 DOI: 10.1007/s12029-025-01331-8
Yuan Jinpeng, Wang Puyu, Haokai Hu, Yang Shaoli, Lin Jiarui, Zhuang Yezhong, Xu Muming, Chen Binbin, Lin Guixing

Purpose: This study evaluates the effectiveness of laparoscopic dog ear region removal as a modified double-stapling anastomosis (DSA) technique to reduce the risk of anastomotic leakage (AL) after colorectal cancer surgery.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 216 colorectal cancer patients who underwent laparoscopic anterior resection between January 2022 and June 2024. Patients were divided into two groups: the non-dog ear group (n = 104), which underwent dog ear area resection before DSA, and the DSA group (n = 112), which received conventional treatment.

Results: Baseline demographics, comorbidities, tumor characteristics, and preoperative treatments were comparable between the two groups (all p > 0.05). There were no significant differences in operative time (non-dog ear: 213.57 ± 57.06 min vs. DSA: 210.23 ± 65.11 min, p = 0.688) or overall complication rates (9.62% vs. 17.85%, p = 0.080). However, the non-dog ear group had significantly lower AL incidence (1.92% vs. 8.04%, p = 0.041) and shorter postoperative hospitalization and drainage tube removal times.

Conclusions: In this retrospective study, laparoscopic "dog ear" resection before DSA was associated with reduced AL risk and did not compromise surgical safety in colorectal cancer surgery, suggesting it may be a feasible refinement to standard procedures. These associations, however, require validation through prospective studies.

目的:本研究评价腹腔镜下犬耳切除作为改良双吻合器吻合(DSA)技术降低结直肠癌术后吻合口漏(AL)风险的有效性。方法:回顾性分析2022年1月至2024年6月期间行腹腔镜前切除术的216例结直肠癌患者。将患者分为两组:非犬耳组(n = 104),在DSA前行犬耳区域切除术;DSA组(n = 112),接受常规治疗。结果:两组患者的基线人口统计学、合并症、肿瘤特征和术前治疗具有可比性(均p < 0.05)。两组手术时间(非犬耳:213.57±57.06 min vs DSA: 210.23±65.11 min, p = 0.688)和总并发症发生率(9.62% vs 17.85%, p = 0.080)差异无统计学意义。而非狗耳组AL发生率明显降低(1.92%比8.04%,p = 0.041),术后住院时间和拔管时间较短。结论:在这项回顾性研究中,DSA前腹腔镜“狗耳”切除术与降低AL风险相关,并且不影响结直肠癌手术的手术安全性,表明它可能是标准手术的可行改进。然而,这些关联需要通过前瞻性研究来验证。
{"title":"Reducing AL After Double-Stapling Anastomosis: A Novel Laparoscopic Technique for Dog Ear Area Resection.","authors":"Yuan Jinpeng, Wang Puyu, Haokai Hu, Yang Shaoli, Lin Jiarui, Zhuang Yezhong, Xu Muming, Chen Binbin, Lin Guixing","doi":"10.1007/s12029-025-01331-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-025-01331-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study evaluates the effectiveness of laparoscopic dog ear region removal as a modified double-stapling anastomosis (DSA) technique to reduce the risk of anastomotic leakage (AL) after colorectal cancer surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 216 colorectal cancer patients who underwent laparoscopic anterior resection between January 2022 and June 2024. Patients were divided into two groups: the non-dog ear group (n = 104), which underwent dog ear area resection before DSA, and the DSA group (n = 112), which received conventional treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline demographics, comorbidities, tumor characteristics, and preoperative treatments were comparable between the two groups (all p > 0.05). There were no significant differences in operative time (non-dog ear: 213.57 ± 57.06 min vs. DSA: 210.23 ± 65.11 min, p = 0.688) or overall complication rates (9.62% vs. 17.85%, p = 0.080). However, the non-dog ear group had significantly lower AL incidence (1.92% vs. 8.04%, p = 0.041) and shorter postoperative hospitalization and drainage tube removal times.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this retrospective study, laparoscopic \"dog ear\" resection before DSA was associated with reduced AL risk and did not compromise surgical safety in colorectal cancer surgery, suggesting it may be a feasible refinement to standard procedures. These associations, however, require validation through prospective studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":15895,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer","volume":"56 1","pages":"210"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145390421","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact of Age and Comorbidities On Therapeutic Decision-making Among Older Patients With Gastrointestinal Cancer. 年龄和合并症对老年胃肠道肿瘤患者治疗决策的影响
IF 1.6 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-10-27 DOI: 10.1007/s12029-025-01337-2
Marianna Javier-González, Raffaele Galli, Carlos Amorós Rivera, Robert Rosenberg, Marcus Vetter

Purpose: The impact of age, comorbidities and geriatric syndromes is often overlooked during tumor board (TB) decisions. We investigated how frequently age, comorbidities, functional and nutritional parameters, and frailty are mentioned when deciding treatments for older adults with gastrointestinal (GI) cancers, and the impact these variables have on adherence to TB decisions and treatment guidelines from the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO).

Methods: Cross-sectional study of data from patients aged ≥ 65 years presented before the GI-TB of a tertiary cancer center between July 2019 and December 2022 based on electronic health records and TB documentation. Mention of age, comorbidity, functional and nutritional parameters, and frailty at decision-making, and adherence to TB decisions and treatment guidelines were assessed.

Results: 418 patients with a mean age of 77 years and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) of 8.6 were included. Geriatric variables were mentioned in 43.8% of cases. Among these, comorbidities were mentioned in 17.2%, whereas age was mentioned in 14.6%. Adherence to TB decisions was 82%, whereas adherence to ESMO guidelines was 69%. Mention of age and comorbidity was associated with a 2-fold and 3-fold reduction in the likelihood of adherence to ESMO guidelines (p = 0.02 and 0.001, respectively). This association was not found when analysing adherence to TB decisions.

Conclusions: Geriatric variables, despite being often neglected at the time of defining treatment for the older adult with cancer, can have an effect on oncologic decision-making. Our findings underscore the need for integrating assessment of geriatric variables into oncologic care to support individualized, guideline-concordant treatment planning that reflects the complexity and needs of this population.

目的:年龄、合并症和老年综合征的影响在肿瘤委员会(TB)的决定中经常被忽视。我们调查了年龄、合并症、功能和营养参数以及虚弱在决定老年胃肠道(GI)癌症治疗时被提及的频率,以及这些变量对遵守欧洲肿瘤医学学会(ESMO)结核病决策和治疗指南的影响。方法:基于电子健康记录和结核病文件,对2019年7月至2022年12月在某三级癌症中心GI-TB就诊的年龄≥65岁患者的数据进行横断面研究。评估了年龄、合并症、功能和营养参数、决策时的脆弱性以及对结核病决策和治疗指南的遵守情况。结果:纳入418例患者,平均年龄77岁,Charlson合并症指数(CCI) 8.6。43.8%的病例提到了老年变量。其中,17.2%的患者提到了合并症,而14.6%的患者提到了年龄。遵守结核病决策的比例为82%,而遵守ESMO指南的比例为69%。年龄和合并症的提及与ESMO指南依从性降低2倍和3倍相关(p分别= 0.02和0.001)。在分析结核病决策的遵守情况时,没有发现这种关联。结论:尽管在确定老年癌症患者的治疗方法时经常被忽视,但老年变量可能对肿瘤学决策产生影响。我们的研究结果强调需要将老年变量的评估整合到肿瘤治疗中,以支持个性化的、符合指南的治疗计划,以反映这一人群的复杂性和需求。
{"title":"Impact of Age and Comorbidities On Therapeutic Decision-making Among Older Patients With Gastrointestinal Cancer.","authors":"Marianna Javier-González, Raffaele Galli, Carlos Amorós Rivera, Robert Rosenberg, Marcus Vetter","doi":"10.1007/s12029-025-01337-2","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12029-025-01337-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The impact of age, comorbidities and geriatric syndromes is often overlooked during tumor board (TB) decisions. We investigated how frequently age, comorbidities, functional and nutritional parameters, and frailty are mentioned when deciding treatments for older adults with gastrointestinal (GI) cancers, and the impact these variables have on adherence to TB decisions and treatment guidelines from the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional study of data from patients aged ≥ 65 years presented before the GI-TB of a tertiary cancer center between July 2019 and December 2022 based on electronic health records and TB documentation. Mention of age, comorbidity, functional and nutritional parameters, and frailty at decision-making, and adherence to TB decisions and treatment guidelines were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>418 patients with a mean age of 77 years and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) of 8.6 were included. Geriatric variables were mentioned in 43.8% of cases. Among these, comorbidities were mentioned in 17.2%, whereas age was mentioned in 14.6%. Adherence to TB decisions was 82%, whereas adherence to ESMO guidelines was 69%. Mention of age and comorbidity was associated with a 2-fold and 3-fold reduction in the likelihood of adherence to ESMO guidelines (p = 0.02 and 0.001, respectively). This association was not found when analysing adherence to TB decisions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Geriatric variables, despite being often neglected at the time of defining treatment for the older adult with cancer, can have an effect on oncologic decision-making. Our findings underscore the need for integrating assessment of geriatric variables into oncologic care to support individualized, guideline-concordant treatment planning that reflects the complexity and needs of this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":15895,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer","volume":"56 1","pages":"209"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12559110/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145377525","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Versus Chemoradiation Following Induction Chemotherapy in Borderline Resectable and Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer. 边缘可切除和局部晚期胰腺癌诱导化疗后立体定向体放射治疗与放化疗的随机对照试验。
IF 1.6 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-10-27 DOI: 10.1007/s12029-025-01282-0
Vandana Thakur, Divya Khosla, Gaganpreet Singh, Rakesh Kapoor, Rajesh Gupta, Mahendra Kumar, Divyesh Kumar, Surinder S Rana, Harjeet Singh, Jimil Shah, Renu Madan, Shikha Goyal, Arun S Oinam

Purpose: Adenocarcinoma of pancreas is a lethal malignancy with multimodality treatment used in various combinations to improve survival. This study aimed to evaluate resectability rates, R0 resection status, and local progression-free survival (LPFS) in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) and locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by either stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) or conventional chemoradiation (CRT).

Methods: In this single institution prospective study, 20 pancreatic cancer patients (15 LAPC and 5 BRPC) received NACT (modified FOLFIRINOX or Gemcitabine with nab-paclitaxel), followed by random assignment (1:1) to SBRT (33-42 Gy/5-6 fractions) or CRT (45 Gy in 25 fractions with Capecitabine). After restaging, patients who were eligible underwent surgery, while others continued chemotherapy. Toxicity, quality of life (QoL), and haematological parameters (NLR, PLR) were assessed.

Results: Resectability was observed in 15% of patients, all from the SBRT arm. All patients who underwent resection were LAPC at diagnosis. The mean overall survival (OS) and local progression-free survival (LPFS) in the SBRT group were 21.8 months and 14 months, respectively, with a median OS of 15 months and median LPFS of 11 months. In comparison, the CRT group had a mean OS and LPFS of 13 months and 8.6 months, respectively, with a median OS of 12 months and median PFS of 7 months. One-year OS was 80% in the SBRT arm and 45% in the CRT arm. QOL improved in both arms, with better scores in the SBRT group. SBRT had no grade 3 or 4 toxicities. Lower NLR and PLR values correlated with better outcomes.

Conclusion: SBRT showed superior resectability, survival outcomes, and QoL compared to CRT in patients with BRPC and LAPC. However, due to the study's small sample size and single-centre design, these findings are hypothesis-generating and warrant validation in larger multicentre trials.

目的:胰腺腺癌是一种致死性恶性肿瘤,采用多种治疗方法联合治疗以提高生存率。本研究旨在评估临界可切除胰腺癌(BRPC)和局部晚期胰腺癌(LAPC)患者接受新辅助化疗(NACT)后立体定向体放疗(SBRT)或常规放化疗(CRT)的可切除率、R0切除状态和局部无进展生存期(LPFS)。方法:在这项单机构前瞻性研究中,20名胰腺癌患者(15名LAPC和5名BRPC)接受NACT(改良FOLFIRINOX或吉西他滨与nab-紫杉醇联合),随后随机分配(1:1)到SBRT (33-42 Gy/5-6次)或CRT (45 Gy/ 25次与卡培他滨联合)。重新分组后,符合条件的患者接受手术,而其他患者继续化疗。评估毒性、生活质量(QoL)和血液学参数(NLR、PLR)。结果:15%的患者可切除,全部来自SBRT组。所有接受切除术的患者在诊断时均为LAPC。SBRT组的平均总生存期(OS)和局部无进展生存期(LPFS)分别为21.8个月和14个月,中位OS为15个月,中位LPFS为11个月。相比之下,CRT组的平均OS和LPFS分别为13个月和8.6个月,中位OS为12个月,中位PFS为7个月。SBRT组1年OS为80%,CRT组为45%。两组患者的生活质量均有改善,SBRT组得分更高。SBRT无3级和4级毒性。较低的NLR和PLR值与较好的预后相关。结论:与CRT相比,SBRT在BRPC和LAPC患者中具有更好的可切除性、生存结果和生活质量。然而,由于该研究样本量小且设计为单中心,这些发现是假设产生的,需要在更大的多中心试验中验证。
{"title":"A Randomized Controlled Trial of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Versus Chemoradiation Following Induction Chemotherapy in Borderline Resectable and Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer.","authors":"Vandana Thakur, Divya Khosla, Gaganpreet Singh, Rakesh Kapoor, Rajesh Gupta, Mahendra Kumar, Divyesh Kumar, Surinder S Rana, Harjeet Singh, Jimil Shah, Renu Madan, Shikha Goyal, Arun S Oinam","doi":"10.1007/s12029-025-01282-0","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12029-025-01282-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Adenocarcinoma of pancreas is a lethal malignancy with multimodality treatment used in various combinations to improve survival. This study aimed to evaluate resectability rates, R0 resection status, and local progression-free survival (LPFS) in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) and locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by either stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) or conventional chemoradiation (CRT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single institution prospective study, 20 pancreatic cancer patients (15 LAPC and 5 BRPC) received NACT (modified FOLFIRINOX or Gemcitabine with nab-paclitaxel), followed by random assignment (1:1) to SBRT (33-42 Gy/5-6 fractions) or CRT (45 Gy in 25 fractions with Capecitabine). After restaging, patients who were eligible underwent surgery, while others continued chemotherapy. Toxicity, quality of life (QoL), and haematological parameters (NLR, PLR) were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Resectability was observed in 15% of patients, all from the SBRT arm. All patients who underwent resection were LAPC at diagnosis. The mean overall survival (OS) and local progression-free survival (LPFS) in the SBRT group were 21.8 months and 14 months, respectively, with a median OS of 15 months and median LPFS of 11 months. In comparison, the CRT group had a mean OS and LPFS of 13 months and 8.6 months, respectively, with a median OS of 12 months and median PFS of 7 months. One-year OS was 80% in the SBRT arm and 45% in the CRT arm. QOL improved in both arms, with better scores in the SBRT group. SBRT had no grade 3 or 4 toxicities. Lower NLR and PLR values correlated with better outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SBRT showed superior resectability, survival outcomes, and QoL compared to CRT in patients with BRPC and LAPC. However, due to the study's small sample size and single-centre design, these findings are hypothesis-generating and warrant validation in larger multicentre trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":15895,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer","volume":"56 1","pages":"208"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145377505","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Landscape of Genomic Alterations in Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Pathways in Biliary Cancers: Implications for Targeted Therapies. 胆道肿瘤中受体酪氨酸激酶途径的基因组改变:对靶向治疗的影响。
IF 1.6 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-10-18 DOI: 10.1007/s12029-025-01335-4
Ioannis A Voutsadakis

Background: Biliary carcinomas are aggressive cancers with a high mortality rate. When metastatic, biliary cancers are associated with a short survival and low response to treatments. The first line therapy of metastatic biliary carcinomas consists of a platinum doublet chemotherapy combination with an immune checkpoint inhibitor and results in a median overall survival in the range of approximately 12-13 months, with 20% to 25% of patients surviving at 2 years. Second line chemotherapy options based on fluoropyrimidines are associated with a median survival of less than 6 months. Genomic studies in recent years have clarified molecular aspects of biliary cancers and have confirmed the molecular heterogeneity between the intrahepatic, extrahepatic and gallbladder primary sites.

Methods: Publicly available genomic cohorts of biliary cancer primary locations were interrogated for common mutations and copy number alterations with a focus on receptor tyrosine kinases and their signal transduction pathways.

Results: Specific mutations and structural alterations have different prevalence depending on the primary location. Alterations in receptor tyrosine kinases and the transduction pathways originating from them show differential prevalence in the primary locations of the biliary cancers and create diverse treatment opportunities that can be harnessed for drug development. Approximately 49% of intrahepatic, 57.6% of gallbladder, and 66% of extrahepatic carcinomas harbor RTK pathway alterations.

Conclusions: Targeted therapies for individual components of these kinase receptors and pathways, including FGFR2, HER2, BRAF and others, have already been introduced in clinical practice for the treatment of patients with biliary tumors bearing alterations in these genes. The findings underscore the need for primary site-driven genomic testing to guide therapy selection. The current analysis discusses strategies to create opportunities for clinically available targeted therapies.

背景:胆道癌是侵袭性肿瘤,死亡率高。当转移时,胆道癌的生存期较短,对治疗的反应较低。转移性胆道癌的一线治疗包括铂类双重化疗联合免疫检查点抑制剂,结果中位总生存期约为12-13个月,20%至25%的患者存活2年。基于氟嘧啶的二线化疗方案与中位生存期小于6个月相关。近年来的基因组研究已经阐明了胆道癌的分子方面,并证实了肝内、肝外和胆囊原发部位之间的分子异质性。方法:公开获得的胆道癌原发部位基因组队列被询问常见突变和拷贝数改变,重点关注受体酪氨酸激酶及其信号转导途径。结果:特异性突变和结构改变的发生率随原发部位的不同而不同。受体酪氨酸激酶及其转导途径的改变在胆道癌的原发部位显示出不同的患病率,并创造了多种治疗机会,可用于药物开发。大约49%的肝内癌、57.6%的胆囊癌和66%的肝外癌存在RTK通路改变。结论:针对这些激酶受体和通路的单个成分(包括FGFR2、HER2、BRAF等)的靶向治疗已经被引入临床实践,用于治疗这些基因改变的胆道肿瘤患者。研究结果强调了对原发部位驱动的基因组检测来指导治疗选择的必要性。当前的分析讨论了为临床可用的靶向治疗创造机会的策略。
{"title":"The Landscape of Genomic Alterations in Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Pathways in Biliary Cancers: Implications for Targeted Therapies.","authors":"Ioannis A Voutsadakis","doi":"10.1007/s12029-025-01335-4","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12029-025-01335-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Biliary carcinomas are aggressive cancers with a high mortality rate. When metastatic, biliary cancers are associated with a short survival and low response to treatments. The first line therapy of metastatic biliary carcinomas consists of a platinum doublet chemotherapy combination with an immune checkpoint inhibitor and results in a median overall survival in the range of approximately 12-13 months, with 20% to 25% of patients surviving at 2 years. Second line chemotherapy options based on fluoropyrimidines are associated with a median survival of less than 6 months. Genomic studies in recent years have clarified molecular aspects of biliary cancers and have confirmed the molecular heterogeneity between the intrahepatic, extrahepatic and gallbladder primary sites.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Publicly available genomic cohorts of biliary cancer primary locations were interrogated for common mutations and copy number alterations with a focus on receptor tyrosine kinases and their signal transduction pathways.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Specific mutations and structural alterations have different prevalence depending on the primary location. Alterations in receptor tyrosine kinases and the transduction pathways originating from them show differential prevalence in the primary locations of the biliary cancers and create diverse treatment opportunities that can be harnessed for drug development. Approximately 49% of intrahepatic, 57.6% of gallbladder, and 66% of extrahepatic carcinomas harbor RTK pathway alterations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Targeted therapies for individual components of these kinase receptors and pathways, including FGFR2, HER2, BRAF and others, have already been introduced in clinical practice for the treatment of patients with biliary tumors bearing alterations in these genes. The findings underscore the need for primary site-driven genomic testing to guide therapy selection. The current analysis discusses strategies to create opportunities for clinically available targeted therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":15895,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer","volume":"56 1","pages":"207"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12535519/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145318327","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Does Malignant Ascites Define Prognosis in Gastric Cancer with Peritoneal Spread? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. 恶性腹水决定胃癌腹膜扩散的预后吗?系统回顾和荟萃分析。
IF 1.6 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-10-16 DOI: 10.1007/s12029-025-01332-7
Francisco Cezar Aquino de Moraes, Luis Henrique Rios Moreira Rego, Gustavo Tadeu Freitas Uchôa Matheus, Clara Rocha Dantas, Ana Luiza Marçalo de Tolosa, Rommel Mario Rodríguez Burbano, Mario Hiroyuki Hirata

Background: Gastric cancer (GC) is the fifth most common cancer and a leading cause of cancer-related death. Peritoneal metastases occur in up to 25% of patients, with nearly half developing malignant ascites (MA), which arises from lymphatic obstruction, vascular permeability, and immune dysregulation. Median overall survival (OS) in this setting is poor (2-8 months). This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluate the prognostic impact of ascites in metastatic GC.

Materials and methods: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane were searched for studies reporting OS in metastatic GC patients with and without ascites. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using fixed and random-effects models in RStudio 4.2.3.

Results: Overall, 14 studies involving 2179 patients, with 1208 having ascites, were included in the analysis. Of these, 13 were retrospective studies and 1 was a prospective study. The presence of ascites was associated with a significantly worse prognosis compared to its absence (HR 1.8418; 95% CI 1.5657-2.1667; P < 0.001). Similarly, the comparison of massive type ascites with mild to moderate type shows a worse outcome for the higher grade of ascites (HR 1.8597; 95% CI 1.4633-2.3635; P < 0.001). Comparing no to moderate ascites vs massive ascites, the massive type also shows a significantly lower overall survival (HR 2.5114; 95% CI 1.5409-4.0931; P < 0.001).

Conclusions: This meta-analysis suggests that the presence of ascites and its grades are essential prognostic factors for metastatic gastric cancer, significantly worsening overall survival.

背景:胃癌是第五大常见癌症,也是癌症相关死亡的主要原因。高达25%的患者发生腹膜转移,其中近一半发展为恶性腹水(MA),这是由淋巴阻塞、血管通透性和免疫失调引起的。这种情况下的中位总生存期(OS)较差(2-8个月)。本系统综述和荟萃分析评估了转移性胃癌腹水对预后的影响。材料和方法:检索PubMed、Embase和Cochrane,以报告伴有或不伴有腹水的转移性胃癌患者发生OS的研究。使用RStudio 4.2.3中的固定效应和随机效应模型计算95%置信区间(ci)的风险比(hr)。结果:总的来说,14项研究涉及2179例患者,其中1208例有腹水,被纳入分析。其中13项为回顾性研究,1项为前瞻性研究。结论:本荟萃分析提示,腹水的存在及其分级是转移性胃癌的重要预后因素,会显著恶化总生存期。
{"title":"Does Malignant Ascites Define Prognosis in Gastric Cancer with Peritoneal Spread? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Francisco Cezar Aquino de Moraes, Luis Henrique Rios Moreira Rego, Gustavo Tadeu Freitas Uchôa Matheus, Clara Rocha Dantas, Ana Luiza Marçalo de Tolosa, Rommel Mario Rodríguez Burbano, Mario Hiroyuki Hirata","doi":"10.1007/s12029-025-01332-7","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12029-025-01332-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gastric cancer (GC) is the fifth most common cancer and a leading cause of cancer-related death. Peritoneal metastases occur in up to 25% of patients, with nearly half developing malignant ascites (MA), which arises from lymphatic obstruction, vascular permeability, and immune dysregulation. Median overall survival (OS) in this setting is poor (2-8 months). This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluate the prognostic impact of ascites in metastatic GC.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane were searched for studies reporting OS in metastatic GC patients with and without ascites. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using fixed and random-effects models in RStudio 4.2.3.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 14 studies involving 2179 patients, with 1208 having ascites, were included in the analysis. Of these, 13 were retrospective studies and 1 was a prospective study. The presence of ascites was associated with a significantly worse prognosis compared to its absence (HR 1.8418; 95% CI 1.5657-2.1667; P < 0.001). Similarly, the comparison of massive type ascites with mild to moderate type shows a worse outcome for the higher grade of ascites (HR 1.8597; 95% CI 1.4633-2.3635; P < 0.001). Comparing no to moderate ascites vs massive ascites, the massive type also shows a significantly lower overall survival (HR 2.5114; 95% CI 1.5409-4.0931; P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This meta-analysis suggests that the presence of ascites and its grades are essential prognostic factors for metastatic gastric cancer, significantly worsening overall survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":15895,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer","volume":"56 1","pages":"206"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145301377","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparative Outcomes of Spleen Preservation and Splenectomy in Total Gastrectomy for Proximal Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. 近端胃癌全胃切除术中脾保留与脾切除的比较结果:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
IF 1.6 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-10-15 DOI: 10.1007/s12029-025-01334-5
Ana Luíza Rocha Soares Menegat, Brenda Luana Rocha Soares Menegat, Bárbara Corrêa Garcia Simões, Gustavo Tadeu Freitas Uchôa Matheus, Clara Rocha Dantas, Barbara Antonia Dups Talah, Francisco Cezar Aquino de Moraes

Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated whether spleen-preserving surgery with gastrectomy reduces the risk of intra-and postoperative complications compared with splenectomy in patients with proximal gastric cancer.

Background: Total gastrectomy with splenic hilar lymph node dissection, often involving splenectomy, is the standard approach for proximal gastric cancer. However, the effect of splenectomy on patient outcomes remains unclear.

Methods: We searched PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases for studies comparing spleen preservation and splenectomy in total gastrectomy. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and observational studies were included in this study. Risk Ratios (RR) and Mean Differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 test, and statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

Results: Ten studies with 2 221 patients were included, 1 RCT and 9 retrospective cohort studies. Of these, 1 173 (52.81%) underwent spleen-preserving surgery, and 1 048 (47.19%) underwent splenectomy. Spleen-preserving surgery was associated with reduced pancreatic fistula (RR 0.30; p < 0.000001), blood loss (MD -172.47; p = 0.012396), anastomotic leak (RR 0.51; p = 0.006769), intra-abdominal abscess (RR 0.40; p = 0.000160), and complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification (RR 0.50; p = 0.010315). Other outcomes, such as the length of hospital stay, operative time, pulmonary complications, and wound infection showed no significant differences.

Conclusion: Spleen-preserving gastrectomy reduces postoperative complications compared with splenectomy, supporting its use as the safer approach in proximal gastric cancer whenever oncologic safety is ensured.

目的:本系统综述和荟萃分析评估与脾切除术相比,保脾手术加胃切除术是否能降低近端胃癌患者的术后并发症风险。背景:全胃切除术合并脾门淋巴结清扫,通常包括脾切除术,是治疗近端胃癌的标准入路。然而,脾切除术对患者预后的影响尚不清楚。方法:我们检索PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane和Web of Science数据库,以比较全胃切除术中脾脏保留和脾切除的研究。本研究纳入随机临床试验(RCTs)和观察性研究。计算95%置信区间(CI)的风险比(RR)和平均差异(MD)。结果:纳入10项研究,共2221例患者,1项RCT研究,9项回顾性队列研究。其中1173例(52.81%)行保脾手术,1048例(47.19%)行脾切除术。保脾手术与胰瘘减少相关(RR 0.30; p)结论:与脾切除术相比,保脾胃切除术可减少术后并发症,在保证肿瘤安全的情况下,保脾胃切除术是更安全的胃癌近端切除方法。
{"title":"Comparative Outcomes of Spleen Preservation and Splenectomy in Total Gastrectomy for Proximal Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Ana Luíza Rocha Soares Menegat, Brenda Luana Rocha Soares Menegat, Bárbara Corrêa Garcia Simões, Gustavo Tadeu Freitas Uchôa Matheus, Clara Rocha Dantas, Barbara Antonia Dups Talah, Francisco Cezar Aquino de Moraes","doi":"10.1007/s12029-025-01334-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12029-025-01334-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated whether spleen-preserving surgery with gastrectomy reduces the risk of intra-and postoperative complications compared with splenectomy in patients with proximal gastric cancer.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Total gastrectomy with splenic hilar lymph node dissection, often involving splenectomy, is the standard approach for proximal gastric cancer. However, the effect of splenectomy on patient outcomes remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases for studies comparing spleen preservation and splenectomy in total gastrectomy. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and observational studies were included in this study. Risk Ratios (RR) and Mean Differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I<sup>2</sup> test, and statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten studies with 2 221 patients were included, 1 RCT and 9 retrospective cohort studies. Of these, 1 173 (52.81%) underwent spleen-preserving surgery, and 1 048 (47.19%) underwent splenectomy. Spleen-preserving surgery was associated with reduced pancreatic fistula (RR 0.30; p < 0.000001), blood loss (MD -172.47; p = 0.012396), anastomotic leak (RR 0.51; p = 0.006769), intra-abdominal abscess (RR 0.40; p = 0.000160), and complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification (RR 0.50; p = 0.010315). Other outcomes, such as the length of hospital stay, operative time, pulmonary complications, and wound infection showed no significant differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Spleen-preserving gastrectomy reduces postoperative complications compared with splenectomy, supporting its use as the safer approach in proximal gastric cancer whenever oncologic safety is ensured.</p>","PeriodicalId":15895,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer","volume":"56 1","pages":"204"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145292550","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Overcoming the Challenge: A Comprehensive Review of Neoadjuvant Treatment Resistance in Rectal Cancer. 克服挑战:直肠癌新辅助治疗耐药的综合综述。
IF 1.6 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-10-15 DOI: 10.1007/s12029-025-01324-7
Alexandru Micu, Andrei Diaconescu, Corina-Elena Minciuna, Teodora Manuc, Simona Olimpia Dima, Gabriela Droc, Vlad Herlea, Gabriel Becheanu, Adina Emilia Croitoru, Catalin Vasilescu

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer and remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality, particularly among younger men. Approximately one-third of colorectal cancers occur in the rectum. For patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, neoadjuvant therapy is considered the standard treatment approach. Despite advances in therapeutic approaches, improvements in the 5-year survival rate have been modest. Accurate assessment of tumor response to neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) is critical for guiding subsequent treatment strategies, especially when considering eligibility for non-operative management (NOM). Common evaluation methods include digital rectal examination (DRE), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and high-definition flexible endoscopy (HDFE). Tumor regression grading (TRG) systems-both histopathological (pTRG) and MRI-based (mrTRG)-are valuable tools for quantifying treatment response and predicting long-term outcomes. However, resistance to NAT remains a significant clinical challenge and is driven by a complex interplay of molecular mechanisms. Genetic factors, such as RAS mutations, have been linked to resistance to chemoradiotherapy (CRT), while tumors exhibiting microsatellite instability (MSI-high) tend to respond poorly to CRT but may show favorable outcomes with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Epigenetic pathways, including dysregulation of Wnt/β-catenin and PI3K/AKT signaling, along with alterations in DNA damage repair mechanisms, further influence CRT sensitivity. The tumor microenvironment also plays a pivotal role in modulating therapy response. Elements such as immune cell infiltration, hypoxia, angiogenesis, and the presence of cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) contribute to a pro-resistance landscape. Moreover, emerging evidence suggests that gut microbiota composition-particularly an enrichment of Bacteroides species-is associated with diminished response to NAT. Understanding these multifaceted biological interactions is essential for developing personalized and more effective therapeutic strategies, with the goal of enhancing response to NAT and ultimately improving clinical outcomes in patients with rectal cancer.

结直肠癌(CRC)是第三大最常诊断的癌症,仍然是癌症相关死亡的主要原因,特别是在年轻男性中。大约三分之一的结直肠癌发生在直肠。对于局部晚期直肠癌患者,新辅助治疗被认为是标准的治疗方法。尽管治疗方法有所进步,但5年生存率的改善并不明显。准确评估肿瘤对新辅助治疗(NAT)的反应对于指导后续治疗策略至关重要,特别是在考虑非手术治疗(NOM)的资格时。常用的评估方法包括直肠指检(DRE)、磁共振成像(MRI)和高清柔性内窥镜(HDFE)。肿瘤消退分级(TRG)系统-包括组织病理学(pTRG)和基于mri (mrTRG)-是量化治疗反应和预测长期结果的宝贵工具。然而,对NAT的耐药性仍然是一个重大的临床挑战,并由分子机制的复杂相互作用驱动。遗传因素,如RAS突变,与放化疗(CRT)耐药有关,而表现出微卫星不稳定性(msi -高)的肿瘤往往对CRT反应不佳,但使用免疫检查点抑制剂可能显示出良好的结果。表观遗传途径,包括Wnt/β-catenin和PI3K/AKT信号的失调,以及DNA损伤修复机制的改变,进一步影响CRT的敏感性。肿瘤微环境在调节治疗反应中也起着关键作用。免疫细胞浸润、缺氧、血管生成和癌症相关成纤维细胞(CAFs)的存在等因素促成了有利于抵抗的景观。此外,新出现的证据表明,肠道微生物群组成-特别是拟杆菌种类的丰富-与对NAT的反应减少有关。了解这些多层面的生物学相互作用对于制定个性化和更有效的治疗策略至关重要,其目标是增强对NAT的反应,并最终改善直肠癌患者的临床结果。
{"title":"Overcoming the Challenge: A Comprehensive Review of Neoadjuvant Treatment Resistance in Rectal Cancer.","authors":"Alexandru Micu, Andrei Diaconescu, Corina-Elena Minciuna, Teodora Manuc, Simona Olimpia Dima, Gabriela Droc, Vlad Herlea, Gabriel Becheanu, Adina Emilia Croitoru, Catalin Vasilescu","doi":"10.1007/s12029-025-01324-7","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12029-025-01324-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer and remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality, particularly among younger men. Approximately one-third of colorectal cancers occur in the rectum. For patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, neoadjuvant therapy is considered the standard treatment approach. Despite advances in therapeutic approaches, improvements in the 5-year survival rate have been modest. Accurate assessment of tumor response to neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) is critical for guiding subsequent treatment strategies, especially when considering eligibility for non-operative management (NOM). Common evaluation methods include digital rectal examination (DRE), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and high-definition flexible endoscopy (HDFE). Tumor regression grading (TRG) systems-both histopathological (pTRG) and MRI-based (mrTRG)-are valuable tools for quantifying treatment response and predicting long-term outcomes. However, resistance to NAT remains a significant clinical challenge and is driven by a complex interplay of molecular mechanisms. Genetic factors, such as RAS mutations, have been linked to resistance to chemoradiotherapy (CRT), while tumors exhibiting microsatellite instability (MSI-high) tend to respond poorly to CRT but may show favorable outcomes with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Epigenetic pathways, including dysregulation of Wnt/β-catenin and PI3K/AKT signaling, along with alterations in DNA damage repair mechanisms, further influence CRT sensitivity. The tumor microenvironment also plays a pivotal role in modulating therapy response. Elements such as immune cell infiltration, hypoxia, angiogenesis, and the presence of cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) contribute to a pro-resistance landscape. Moreover, emerging evidence suggests that gut microbiota composition-particularly an enrichment of Bacteroides species-is associated with diminished response to NAT. Understanding these multifaceted biological interactions is essential for developing personalized and more effective therapeutic strategies, with the goal of enhancing response to NAT and ultimately improving clinical outcomes in patients with rectal cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":15895,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer","volume":"56 1","pages":"205"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12528186/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145301455","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Area Deprivation Index as a Predictor of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Prognosis: Limited Predictive Utility in an Integrated Care Model. 区域剥夺指数作为肝细胞癌预后的预测因子:在综合护理模型中有限的预测效用。
IF 1.6 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-10-15 DOI: 10.1007/s12029-025-01326-5
Avi Toiv, Hope B O'Brien, Anqi Wang, Laila Poisson, Reena J Salgia

Purpose: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide, yet mortality outcomes in patients with HCC can vary widely. Socioeconomic disparities are known to influence health outcomes in patients with various cancers. We aim to investigate the relationship between socioeconomic status as measured by the Area Deprivation Index (ADI) and risk of mortality and Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage at the time of diagnosis in patients with HCC.

Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study of patients treated for HCC at an academic liver center between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2020. The primary outcome was time to cause-specific death. The secondary outcome was BCLC stage at the time of HCC diagnosis.

Results: A total of 980 patients (median age 66 years; interquartile range 61-72) were included. ADI was not a significant predictor of mortality across all ADI quintiles. Severity of HCC at diagnosis was associated with increasing deprivation at the state level ADI (P < 0.5 at all quintiles) but not the national ADI level. Advanced BCLC stage (C and D) was significantly associated with cause-specific death in patients with HCC in both models (hazard ratio, 1.94, 95% CI, 1.44-2.62; P < 0.001; hazard ratio, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.44-2.61; P < 0.001).

Conclusion: In patients with HCC treated at an academic liver center, ADI was associated with the severity of cancer at HCC diagnosis; however, mortality risk remained consistent across all ADI quintiles. Access to centers that provide coordinated, multidisciplinary HCC care may help mitigate the impact of socioeconomic disparities on HCC mortality.

目的:肝细胞癌(HCC)是世界范围内癌症相关死亡的主要原因,然而HCC患者的死亡结果差异很大。众所周知,社会经济差异会影响各种癌症患者的健康结果。我们的目的是研究由区域剥夺指数(ADI)衡量的社会经济地位与HCC患者诊断时死亡风险和巴塞罗那诊所肝癌(BCLC)阶段之间的关系。方法:对2016年1月1日至2020年12月31日在某学术肝脏中心接受HCC治疗的患者进行回顾性横断面研究。主要结果是导致特异性死亡的时间。次要结果是HCC诊断时的BCLC阶段。结果:共纳入980例患者(中位年龄66岁,四分位数范围61-72)。在所有ADI五分位数中,ADI并不是死亡率的显著预测因子。结论:在学术肝脏中心接受治疗的HCC患者中,ADI与HCC诊断时癌症的严重程度相关;然而,所有ADI五分位数的死亡风险保持一致。获得提供协调、多学科HCC治疗的中心可能有助于减轻社会经济差异对HCC死亡率的影响。
{"title":"Area Deprivation Index as a Predictor of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Prognosis: Limited Predictive Utility in an Integrated Care Model.","authors":"Avi Toiv, Hope B O'Brien, Anqi Wang, Laila Poisson, Reena J Salgia","doi":"10.1007/s12029-025-01326-5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-025-01326-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide, yet mortality outcomes in patients with HCC can vary widely. Socioeconomic disparities are known to influence health outcomes in patients with various cancers. We aim to investigate the relationship between socioeconomic status as measured by the Area Deprivation Index (ADI) and risk of mortality and Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage at the time of diagnosis in patients with HCC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cross-sectional study of patients treated for HCC at an academic liver center between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2020. The primary outcome was time to cause-specific death. The secondary outcome was BCLC stage at the time of HCC diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 980 patients (median age 66 years; interquartile range 61-72) were included. ADI was not a significant predictor of mortality across all ADI quintiles. Severity of HCC at diagnosis was associated with increasing deprivation at the state level ADI (P < 0.5 at all quintiles) but not the national ADI level. Advanced BCLC stage (C and D) was significantly associated with cause-specific death in patients with HCC in both models (hazard ratio, 1.94, 95% CI, 1.44-2.62; P < 0.001; hazard ratio, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.44-2.61; P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with HCC treated at an academic liver center, ADI was associated with the severity of cancer at HCC diagnosis; however, mortality risk remained consistent across all ADI quintiles. Access to centers that provide coordinated, multidisciplinary HCC care may help mitigate the impact of socioeconomic disparities on HCC mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":15895,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer","volume":"56 1","pages":"203"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145292510","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1