Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation最新文献

Background: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has emerged as a crucial tool in the care of patients with multiorgan failure, and is increasingly utilized as a bridge to transplantation. While data on ECMO as a bridge to isolated heart and lung transplantation have been described, our emerging experience with ECMO as a bridge to thoracic multiorgan transplantation is not yet well understood. This study aims to investigate temporal trends, utilization, and outcomes in ECMO as a bridge to thoracic multiorgan transplantation.

Methods: The United Network for Organ Sharing database was used to identify adult patients undergoing thoracic multiorgan transplantation between 1987 and 2022. Exclusion criteria were recipient age <18 and bridging with other mechanical circulatory support including ventricular assist device (VAD) and intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP). Survival analysis was performed to compare outcomes between patients bridged to transplantation with ECMO and those who were not bridged.

Results: Of 3,927 patients undergoing thoracic multiorgan transplantation, a total of 203 (5.2%) patients received ECMO as a bridge to transplantation. Among ECMO recipients, patients were most commonly bridged to heart-lung (45.8%), followed by heart-kidney (34.5%), and lung-kidney transplantation (11.8%). At a median follow-up of 35.5 months, unadjusted survival among patients bridged with ECMO was decreased versus multiorgan transplant recipients who were not bridged (p<0.001). With adjusted multivariable Cox regression, ECMO was independently associated with an elevated risk of mortality following multiorgan transplantation (HR 1.56 [1.21-2.02], p<0.01). Among patients surviving past 30 days following transplantation, conditional long-term survival was similar between those bridged with ECMO and those not bridged (p = 0.82).

Conclusion: ECMO is increasingly utilized as a bridge to thoracic multiorgan transplantation, and is associated with increased 30 day mortality and decreased long-term survival. In select patients surviving to 30 days following transplantation, similar long-term survival is seen between patients bridged with ECMO and those not bridged.

Background: While structural socioeconomic inequity has been linked with inferior health outcomes, some have postulated reduced access to high-quality care to be the mediator. We assessed whether treatment at high-volume centers (HVC) would mitigate the adverse impact of area deprivation on heart transplantation (HT) outcomes.

Methods: All HT recipients ≥18 years were identified in the 2005-2022 Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network. Neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation was assessed using the previously validated Area Deprivation Index. Recipients with scores in the highest quintile were considered Most Deprived (others: Less Deprived). Hospitals in the highest quartile by cumulative center volume (≥21 transplants/year) were classified as HVC. The primary outcome was post-transplant survival.

Results: Of 38,022 HT recipients, 7,579 (20%) were considered Most Deprived. Following risk adjustment, Most Deprived demonstrated inferior survival at 3 (hazard ratio [HR] 1.14, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06-1.21) and 5 years following transplantation (HR 1.13, CI 1.07-1.20). Similarly, Most Deprived faced greater graft failure at 3 (HR 1.14, CI 1.06-1.22) and 5 years (HR 1.13, CI 1.07-1.20). Evaluating patients transplanted at HVC, Most Deprived continued to face greater mortality at 3 (HR 1.10, CI 1.01-1.21) and 5 years (HR 1.10, CI 1.01-1.19). The interaction between Most Deprived status and care at HVC was not significant, such that transplantation at HVC did not ameliorate the survival disparity between Most and Less Deprived.

Conclusions: Area socioeconomic disadvantage is independently associated with inferior survival. Transplantation at HVC did not eliminate this inequity. Future efforts are needed to increase engagement with longitudinal follow-up care and address systemic root causes to improve outcomes.

Background: Since United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) revised their heart allocation policy in 2018, usage of veno-arterial extracorporeal life support (VA-ECLS) has dramatically increased as a bridge to transplant. This study investigated outcomes of VA-ECLS patients bridged to simultaneous heart-kidney transplant (SHK) in the new policy era.

Methods: This study included 774 adult patients from the UNOS database who received SHK between 10/18/18 and 12/31/21 and compared patients bridged to transplant on VA-ECLS (n = 50) with those not bridged (n = 724).

Results: At baseline, SHK recipients bridged from VA-ECLS were younger (50.5 vs 58.0 years, p = 0.007), had higher estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at time of transplant (47.6 vs 30.1, p < 0.001), and spent fewer days on the waitlist (7.0 vs 33.5 days, p < 0.001). In the perioperative period, VA-ECLS was associated with higher rates of temporary dialysis (56.0% vs 28.0%, p < 0.001) but similar 2-year cumulative incidence of chronic dialysis (7.5% vs 5.4%, p = 0.800) and renal allograft failure (12.0% vs 8.1%, p = 0.500) compared to non-ECLS cohort. However, VA-ECLS patients had decreased survival to discharge (76.0% vs 92.7%, p < 0.001) and 2-year post-transplant survival (71.7% vs 83.0%, p = 0.004), as well as greater 2-year cumulative incidence of cardiac allograft failure (10.0% vs 2.7%, p = 0.002). Multivariable analyses found VA-ECLS at time of transplant to be independently associated with 2-year post-transplant mortality (HR [95% CI]: 3.40 [1.66-6.96], p = 0.001) and cardiac allograft failure (sub-distribution hazard ratio [SHR] [95% CI]: 8.51 [2.77-26.09], p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Under the new allocation policy, patients bridged to SHK from VA-ECLS displayed greater early mortality and cardiac allograft failure but similar renal outcomes compared to non-ECLS counterparts.