Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation最新文献

Background: Thoraco-abdominal normothermic regional perfusion (TA-NRP) has emerged as a strategy for evaluating and recovering the heart in controlled donation after the circulatory determination of death (cDCDD). However, its impact on lung grafts remains largely unknown. We aimed to assess the impact of TA-NRP on the outcomes of recipients of cDCDD lungs.

Methods: This is a retrospective, multicenter, nationwide study describing the outcomes of cDCDD lung transplants (LTs) performed in Spain from January 2021 to November 2023. Patients were divided in 2 groups based on the recovery technique: TA-NRP with the simultaneous recovery of the heart vs abdominal NRP (A-NRP) without simultaneous heart recovery. The primary endpoint was the incidence of Primary Graft Dysfunction (PGD) grade 3 at 72 hours. Secondary endpoints included the overall incidence of PGD, days on mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay, early survival rates, and mid-term outcomes.

Results: Two hundred and eighty three cDCDD LTs were performed during the study period, 28 (10%) using TA-NRP and 255 (90%) using A-NRP. No differences were observed in the incidence of PGD grade 3 at 72 hours between the TA-NRP and the A-NRP group (0% vs 7.6%; p = 0.231), though the overall incidence of PGD was significantly lower with TA-NRP (14.3% vs 41.5%; p = 0.005). We found no significant differences between the groups regarding other post-transplant outcome variables.

Conclusions: TA-NRP allows the simultaneous recovery of both the heart and the lungs in the cDCDD scenario with appropriate LT outcomes comparable to those observed with the A-NRP approach.

Background: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has emerged as a crucial tool in the care of patients with multiorgan failure and is increasingly utilized as a bridge to transplantation. While data on ECMO as a bridge to isolated heart and lung transplantation have been described, our emerging experience with ECMO as a bridge to thoracic multiorgan transplantation is not yet well understood.

Methods: The United Network for Organ Sharing database was used to identify adult patients undergoing thoracic multiorgan transplantation between 1987 and 2022. Exclusion criteria were recipient age <18 and bridging with other non-ECMO mechanical circulatory support, Survival analysis was performed to compare outcomes between patients bridged to transplantation with ECMO and those who were not bridged.

Results: Of 3,927 patients undergoing thoracic multiorgan transplantation, a total of 203 (5.2%) patients received ECMO as a bridge to transplantation. Among ECMO recipients, patients were most commonly bridged to heart-lung (45.8%), followed by heart-kidney (34.5%), and lung-kidney transplantation (11.8%). At a median follow-up of 35.5 months, unadjusted survival among patients bridged with ECMO was decreased versus multiorgan transplant recipients who were not bridged (p < 0.001). Among patients surviving past 30 days following transplantation, conditional long-term survival was similar between ECMO and non-ECMO patients (p = 0.82).

Conclusions: ECMO is increasingly utilized as a bridge to thoracic multiorgan transplantation and is associated with increased 30 day mortality and decreased long-term survival. In select patients surviving to 30 days following transplantation, similar long-term survival is seen between patients bridged with ECMO and those not bridged.

Background: While structural socioeconomic inequity has been linked with inferior health outcomes, some have postulated reduced access to high-quality care to be the mediator. We assessed whether treatment at high-volume centers (HVC) would mitigate the adverse impact of area deprivation on heart transplantation (HT) outcomes.

Methods: All HT recipients ≥18 years were identified in the 2005-2022 Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network. Neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation was assessed using the previously validated Area Deprivation Index. Recipients with scores in the highest quintile were considered Most Deprived (others: Less Deprived). Hospitals in the highest quartile by cumulative center volume (≥21 transplants/year) were classified as HVC. The primary outcome was post-transplant survival.

Results: Of 38,022 HT recipients, 7,579 (20%) were considered Most Deprived. Following risk adjustment, Most Deprived demonstrated inferior survival at 3 (hazard ratio [HR] 1.14, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06-1.21) and 5 years following transplantation (HR 1.13, CI 1.07-1.20). Similarly, Most Deprived faced greater graft failure at 3 (HR 1.14, CI 1.06-1.22) and 5 years (HR 1.13, CI 1.07-1.20). Evaluating patients transplanted at HVC, Most Deprived continued to face greater mortality at 3 (HR 1.10, CI 1.01-1.21) and 5 years (HR 1.10, CI 1.01-1.19). The interaction between Most Deprived status and care at HVC was not significant, such that transplantation at HVC did not ameliorate the survival disparity between Most and Less Deprived.

Conclusions: Area socioeconomic disadvantage is independently associated with inferior survival. Transplantation at HVC did not eliminate this inequity. Future efforts are needed to increase engagement with longitudinal follow-up care and address systemic root causes to improve outcomes.