首页 > 最新文献

Journal of geriatric oncology最新文献

英文 中文
Adding comprehensive geriatric assessment to standard of care in older patients with frailty and hematological cancer: A pilot and feasibility study 在老年虚弱和血液病患者的标准护理中加入综合老年评估:一项试点和可行性研究
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-13 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2025.102835
Nina Andersen , Ann Kristine Weber Giger , Dana Audrey Lawrie , Wee Kheng Soo , Cecilia Margareta Lund , Jesper Ryg , Henrik Frederiksen
{"title":"Adding comprehensive geriatric assessment to standard of care in older patients with frailty and hematological cancer: A pilot and feasibility study","authors":"Nina Andersen , Ann Kristine Weber Giger , Dana Audrey Lawrie , Wee Kheng Soo , Cecilia Margareta Lund , Jesper Ryg , Henrik Frederiksen","doi":"10.1016/j.jgo.2025.102835","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jgo.2025.102835","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15943,"journal":{"name":"Journal of geriatric oncology","volume":"17 2","pages":"Article 102835"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145733164","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Time to modernise research in geriatric oncology: Reflections from the 2025 International Society of Geriatric Oncology Annual Meeting 是时候实现老年肿瘤研究的现代化了:来自2025年国际老年肿瘤学会年会的反思。
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-13 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2025.102837
Sophie Pilleron
{"title":"Time to modernise research in geriatric oncology: Reflections from the 2025 International Society of Geriatric Oncology Annual Meeting","authors":"Sophie Pilleron","doi":"10.1016/j.jgo.2025.102837","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jgo.2025.102837","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15943,"journal":{"name":"Journal of geriatric oncology","volume":"17 2","pages":"Article 102837"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145756943","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Exploring decisional control preferences in older patients with cancer and their caregivers 探讨老年癌症患者及其照顾者的决策控制偏好
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-12 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2025.102832
Sofiia Hryniv , Elizabeth Gilbride , William Consagra , Supriya Mohile , Sule Yilmaz , Kaitlin Kyi , Sindhuja Kadambi , Marielle Jensen-Battaglia , Nikesha Gilmore , Mary Whitehead , Jamil Khatri , Fadi S. Braiteh , Alison Conlin , Kah Poh Loh , Allison Magnuson

Introduction

Exploring informational and decisional control preferences as well as examining concordance and patient-caregiver-physician factors associated with preferences in older adults with cancer and their caregivers may help to better understand the role of caregivers in supporting decision-making.

Materials and methods

We utilized data from a national geriatric assessment (GA) cluster-randomized trial (NCT 02054741; PI: Mohile) that recruited patients aged ≥70 with incurable cancer, their caregivers, and oncologists. Dyadic decision-making control preferences were measured by the Control Preferences Scale (CPS). Patients and caregivers were asked to describe patient's role in treatment decision-making (patient-role CPS); patients and caregivers were also asked to describe the caregiver's role in treatment decision-making (caregiver-role CPS). Matching patient-caregiver responses were considered concordant. Patients and caregivers were also asked about their information preferences regarding the amount of detail about the patients' illness using a scale from 1 (fewest detail) to 5 (the most detail). We used descriptive statistics to summarize CPS, informational preferences, and concordance in responses. We utilized logistic regression to assess dyads' sociodemographic information, patients' GA domain impairments, and physicians' practice characteristics associated with patient-caregiver CPS concordance.

Results

A total of 332 dyads participated; mean age (SD) of patients and caregivers was 76.6 (5.3) and 66.6 (12.2), respectively. Preferences for treatment decision-making varied, with some preferring shared decision-making and others preferring the doctor to make decisions. Concordance between patients and caregivers was observed in 46 % for patient-role CPS and 54 % for caregiver-role CPS. Baseline factors were not associated with dyad concordance. The majority of patients and caregivers preferred the most detailed information about the patient's illness.

Discussion

Clinicians should assess patients' and caregivers' informational and decisional control preferences for optimal support in decision-making.
探索信息和决策控制偏好,以及检查与老年癌症患者及其护理人员偏好相关的一致性和患者-护理人员-医生因素,可能有助于更好地理解护理人员在支持决策中的作用。材料和方法我们使用了一项国家老年评估(GA)集群随机试验(NCT 02054741; PI: mohiile)的数据,该试验招募了年龄≥70岁的无法治愈的癌症患者、他们的护理人员和肿瘤学家。采用控制偏好量表(CPS)测量二元决策控制偏好。患者和护理人员被要求描述患者在治疗决策中的角色(患者-角色CPS);患者和照顾者也被要求描述照顾者在治疗决策中的角色(照顾者-角色CPS)。匹配的患者-护理者反应被认为是和谐的。患者和护理人员也被问及他们对患者疾病细节数量的信息偏好,使用从1(最少细节)到5(最细节)的量表。我们使用描述性统计来总结CPS、信息偏好和响应的一致性。我们使用逻辑回归来评估与患者-护理人员CPS一致性相关的二人组的社会人口统计信息、患者的GA域损伤和医生的实践特征。结果共332人参加;患者和护理人员的平均年龄(SD)分别为76.6岁(5.3岁)和66.6岁(12.2岁)。人们对治疗决策的偏好各不相同,一些人更喜欢共同决策,而另一些人更喜欢医生做决定。患者和护理人员之间的一致性在46%的患者角色CPS和54%的护理人员角色CPS中被观察到。基线因素与双染色体一致性无关。大多数患者和护理人员更喜欢关于患者疾病的最详细的信息。临床医生应该评估患者和护理人员的信息和决策控制偏好,以获得最佳的决策支持。
{"title":"Exploring decisional control preferences in older patients with cancer and their caregivers","authors":"Sofiia Hryniv ,&nbsp;Elizabeth Gilbride ,&nbsp;William Consagra ,&nbsp;Supriya Mohile ,&nbsp;Sule Yilmaz ,&nbsp;Kaitlin Kyi ,&nbsp;Sindhuja Kadambi ,&nbsp;Marielle Jensen-Battaglia ,&nbsp;Nikesha Gilmore ,&nbsp;Mary Whitehead ,&nbsp;Jamil Khatri ,&nbsp;Fadi S. Braiteh ,&nbsp;Alison Conlin ,&nbsp;Kah Poh Loh ,&nbsp;Allison Magnuson","doi":"10.1016/j.jgo.2025.102832","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jgo.2025.102832","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Exploring informational and decisional control preferences as well as examining concordance and patient-caregiver-physician factors associated with preferences in older adults with cancer and their caregivers may help to better understand the role of caregivers in supporting decision-making.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>We utilized data from a national geriatric assessment (GA) cluster-randomized trial (NCT 02054741; PI: Mohile) that recruited patients aged ≥70 with incurable cancer, their caregivers, and oncologists. Dyadic decision-making control preferences were measured by the Control Preferences Scale (CPS). Patients and caregivers were asked to describe patient's role in treatment decision-making (patient-role CPS); patients and caregivers were also asked to describe the caregiver's role in treatment decision-making (caregiver-role CPS). Matching patient-caregiver responses were considered concordant. Patients and caregivers were also asked about their information preferences regarding the amount of detail about the patients' illness using a scale from 1 (fewest detail) to 5 (the most detail). We used descriptive statistics to summarize CPS, informational preferences, and concordance in responses. We utilized logistic regression to assess dyads' sociodemographic information, patients' GA domain impairments, and physicians' practice characteristics associated with patient-caregiver CPS concordance.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 332 dyads participated; mean age (SD) of patients and caregivers was 76.6 (5.3) and 66.6 (12.2), respectively. Preferences for treatment decision-making varied, with some preferring shared decision-making and others preferring the doctor to make decisions. Concordance between patients and caregivers was observed in 46 % for patient-role CPS and 54 % for caregiver-role CPS. Baseline factors were not associated with dyad concordance. The majority of patients and caregivers preferred the most detailed information about the patient's illness.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Clinicians should assess patients' and caregivers' informational and decisional control preferences for optimal support in decision-making.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15943,"journal":{"name":"Journal of geriatric oncology","volume":"17 2","pages":"Article 102832"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145735296","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Safety of CDK4/6 inhibitors in older patients: A FAERS-based analysis of serious and fatal adverse events CDK4/6抑制剂在老年患者中的安全性:基于faers的严重和致命不良事件分析
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-11 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2025.102820
Fausto Petrelli , Alessandro Iaculli , Maria Chiara Parati , Karen Borgonovo , Mara Ghilardi , Veronica Lonati , Irene Angeli , Lorenzo Dottorini

Introduction

CDK4/6 inhibitors—abemaciclib, palbociclib, and ribociclib—are standard treatments for hormone receptor–positive, ERBB2 (HER2)-negative metastatic breast cancer. However, older adults are underrepresented in clinical trials, and age-related safety data remain limited in real-world settings.

Materials and Methods

We conducted a pharmacovigilance analysis using 44,100 individual case safety reports (ICSRs) from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) involving patients aged ≥65 years treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors. Primary endpoints included serious adverse events (SAEs) and fatal outcomes. A secondary analysis compared adverse events between patients aged <65 and 65–85 years, calculating odds ratios (ORs) for selected toxicities, including death, disease progression, diarrhea, and myelosuppression.

Results

Among older patients, 71.2 % of reports involved SAEs and 5.3 % were fatal. Abemaciclib was linked to higher risk of death in those aged 65–85 compared to younger adults (OR 1.53; 95 % CI 1.18–1.99), but lower odds of myelosuppression (OR 0.37; 95 % CI 0.26–0.53). Palbociclib showed similar death risk across age groups (OR 0.98; 95 % CI 0.92–1.05) and reduced risk of disease progression in older adults (OR 0.72; 95 % CI 0.61–0.84). Ribociclib showed no significant age-related difference in fatality (OR 1.01; 95 % CI 0.87–1.17) but had the highest overall death risk (OR 9.14 vs palbociclib; 95 % CI 7.70–10.84).

Discussion

Real-world data reveal drug- and age-specific toxicity differences. Ribociclib and abemaciclib pose higher risks in older adults compared to palbociclib, supporting the need for personalized treatment and careful monitoring in older patients.
cdk4 /6抑制剂abemaciclib、palbociclib和ribociclib是激素受体阳性、ERBB2 (HER2)阴性转移性乳腺癌的标准治疗药物。然而,老年人在临床试验中的代表性不足,与年龄相关的安全性数据在现实环境中仍然有限。材料和方法我们对来自FDA不良事件报告系统(FAERS)的44,100例个体安全报告(ICSRs)进行了药物警戒分析,涉及年龄≥65岁的CDK4/6抑制剂治疗患者。主要终点包括严重不良事件(SAEs)和致命结局。第二项分析比较了65岁和65 - 85岁患者的不良事件,计算了所选毒性的优势比(or),包括死亡、疾病进展、腹泻和骨髓抑制。结果在老年患者中,71.2%的报告涉及SAEs, 5.3%的报告死亡。与年轻人相比,Abemaciclib与65-85岁患者的死亡风险相关(OR 1.53; 95% CI 1.18-1.99),但骨髓抑制的风险较低(OR 0.37; 95% CI 0.26-0.53)。帕博西尼在各年龄组显示相似的死亡风险(OR 0.98; 95% CI 0.92-1.05),老年人疾病进展风险降低(OR 0.72; 95% CI 0.61-0.84)。Ribociclib在病死率方面没有显着的年龄相关差异(OR 1.01; 95% CI 0.87-1.17),但总体死亡风险最高(OR 9.14 vs palbociclib; 95% CI 7.70-10.84)。真实世界的数据揭示了药物和年龄特异性的毒性差异。与帕博西尼相比,Ribociclib和abemaciclib在老年人中具有更高的风险,这支持了老年患者个性化治疗和仔细监测的必要性。
{"title":"Safety of CDK4/6 inhibitors in older patients: A FAERS-based analysis of serious and fatal adverse events","authors":"Fausto Petrelli ,&nbsp;Alessandro Iaculli ,&nbsp;Maria Chiara Parati ,&nbsp;Karen Borgonovo ,&nbsp;Mara Ghilardi ,&nbsp;Veronica Lonati ,&nbsp;Irene Angeli ,&nbsp;Lorenzo Dottorini","doi":"10.1016/j.jgo.2025.102820","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jgo.2025.102820","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>CDK4/6 inhibitors—abemaciclib, palbociclib, and ribociclib—are standard treatments for hormone receptor–positive, ERBB2 (HER2)-negative metastatic breast cancer. However, older adults are underrepresented in clinical trials, and age-related safety data remain limited in real-world settings.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>We conducted a pharmacovigilance analysis using 44,100 individual case safety reports (ICSRs) from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) involving patients aged ≥65 years treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors. Primary endpoints included serious adverse events (SAEs) and fatal outcomes. A secondary analysis compared adverse events between patients aged &lt;65 and 65–85 years, calculating odds ratios (ORs) for selected toxicities, including death, disease progression, diarrhea, and myelosuppression.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among older patients, 71.2 % of reports involved SAEs and 5.3 % were fatal. Abemaciclib was linked to higher risk of death in those aged 65–85 compared to younger adults (OR 1.53; 95 % CI 1.18–1.99), but lower odds of myelosuppression (OR 0.37; 95 % CI 0.26–0.53). Palbociclib showed similar death risk across age groups (OR 0.98; 95 % CI 0.92–1.05) and reduced risk of disease progression in older adults (OR 0.72; 95 % CI 0.61–0.84). Ribociclib showed no significant age-related difference in fatality (OR 1.01; 95 % CI 0.87–1.17) but had the highest overall death risk (OR 9.14 vs palbociclib; 95 % CI 7.70–10.84).</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Real-world data reveal drug- and age-specific toxicity differences. Ribociclib and abemaciclib pose higher risks in older adults compared to palbociclib, supporting the need for personalized treatment and careful monitoring in older patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15943,"journal":{"name":"Journal of geriatric oncology","volume":"17 2","pages":"Article 102820"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145735292","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Do we need geriatricians in geriatric oncology? A SIOG geriatricians position statement 我们需要老年肿瘤学专家吗?SIOG老年病专家的立场声明
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-11 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2025.102831
Carolina Gómez-Moreno , Chiara Russo , Armida Parala-Metz , Bérengère Beauplet , Anupa Pillai , Anand Kumar , Domenico Fusco , Suzanne Festen , Siri Rostoft
{"title":"Do we need geriatricians in geriatric oncology? A SIOG geriatricians position statement","authors":"Carolina Gómez-Moreno ,&nbsp;Chiara Russo ,&nbsp;Armida Parala-Metz ,&nbsp;Bérengère Beauplet ,&nbsp;Anupa Pillai ,&nbsp;Anand Kumar ,&nbsp;Domenico Fusco ,&nbsp;Suzanne Festen ,&nbsp;Siri Rostoft","doi":"10.1016/j.jgo.2025.102831","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jgo.2025.102831","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15943,"journal":{"name":"Journal of geriatric oncology","volume":"17 2","pages":"Article 102831"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145735291","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
BDNF genotype and cognition in older adults with breast cancer and healthy controls in the Thinking and Living with Cancer Study 老年乳腺癌患者及健康对照者的BDNF基因型与认知
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-10 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2025.102834
Zev M. Nakamura , Brent J. Small , Xingtao Zhou , Jaeil Ahn , Tim A. Ahles , Ashley L. Artese , Harvey Jay Cohen , Martine Extermann , Deena Graham , Claudine Isaacs , Heather S.L. Jim , Brenna C. McDonald , Kelly Nudelman , Sunita K. Patel , Kelly E. Rentscher , James C. Root , Andrew J. Saykin , Kathleen Van Dyk , Claire E. Wegel , Jeanne S. Mandelblatt , Judith E. Carroll
{"title":"BDNF genotype and cognition in older adults with breast cancer and healthy controls in the Thinking and Living with Cancer Study","authors":"Zev M. Nakamura ,&nbsp;Brent J. Small ,&nbsp;Xingtao Zhou ,&nbsp;Jaeil Ahn ,&nbsp;Tim A. Ahles ,&nbsp;Ashley L. Artese ,&nbsp;Harvey Jay Cohen ,&nbsp;Martine Extermann ,&nbsp;Deena Graham ,&nbsp;Claudine Isaacs ,&nbsp;Heather S.L. Jim ,&nbsp;Brenna C. McDonald ,&nbsp;Kelly Nudelman ,&nbsp;Sunita K. Patel ,&nbsp;Kelly E. Rentscher ,&nbsp;James C. Root ,&nbsp;Andrew J. Saykin ,&nbsp;Kathleen Van Dyk ,&nbsp;Claire E. Wegel ,&nbsp;Jeanne S. Mandelblatt ,&nbsp;Judith E. Carroll","doi":"10.1016/j.jgo.2025.102834","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jgo.2025.102834","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15943,"journal":{"name":"Journal of geriatric oncology","volume":"17 2","pages":"Article 102834"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145735297","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reflections on treatment decision making in older adults with cancer 对老年癌症患者治疗决策的思考。
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-08 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2025.102830
Vincent E.S. Allott , Michael B. Fertleman , Louis J. Koizia , Benjamin H.L. Harris
{"title":"Reflections on treatment decision making in older adults with cancer","authors":"Vincent E.S. Allott ,&nbsp;Michael B. Fertleman ,&nbsp;Louis J. Koizia ,&nbsp;Benjamin H.L. Harris","doi":"10.1016/j.jgo.2025.102830","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jgo.2025.102830","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15943,"journal":{"name":"Journal of geriatric oncology","volume":"17 2","pages":"Article 102830"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145714552","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Dizziness and impaired postural balance in older patients receiving chemotherapy treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis 接受化疗的老年患者的头晕和体位平衡受损:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-05 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2025.102816
Katrine Storm Piper , Martine Puts , Cecilia Lund , Jesper Ryg , Charlotte Suetta , Hanne Elkjær Andersen , Jakob Vasehus Schou , Allan Madsen , Jan Christensen

Introduction

Dizziness and balance impairments are underexplored symptoms in older adults with cancer. Age-related factors, comorbidities, and chemotherapy may contribute to its prevalence and severity, potentially affecting quality of life, increasing fall risk, and delaying treatment. Data on the incidence and prevalence of these symptoms are limited. This systematic review aimed to summarize the evidence and estimate the incidence and prevalence of dizziness or vertigo and impaired postural balance in patients with cancer ≥65 years receiving chemotherapy.

Materials and Methods

We searched PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and CINAHL in May 2025 without date or language restrictions. Cross sectional studies, cohort studies, randomized controlled trials, and mixed method studies investigating incidence and/or prevalence of dizziness or vertigo and impaired postural balance were included. Random-effects meta-analysis, employing the inverse-variance method, was applied. Certainty of evidence was rated by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

Results

From 15,614 title/abstracts screened, 14 studies (1259 participants) were included. Incidence could not be evaluated. Studies reporting prevalence across multiple chemotherapy regimens contributed separate estimates for each regimen. Meta-analysis included 25 prevalence estimates for dizziness and three for impaired postural balance. The pooled prevalence of dizziness was 15 % (95 % CI:10 %–22 %). Assessor-reported prevalence using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) was 11 % (95 % CI: 8 %–16 %), while patient-reported prevalence rate using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Chemotherapy Induced Peripheral Neuropathy Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-CIPN20), or a self-constructed questionnaire was 35 % (95 % CI: 20 %–53 %). Most studies demonstrated a high risk of bias, and certainty of evidence was very low due to unstructured assessor-reported measurement methods. Impaired postural balance prevalence from one study was 48 % (95 % CI: 39 %–57 %) with low certainty of evidence. Prevalence of dizziness and impaired postural balance did not differ significantly across chemotherapy regimens.

Discussion

Prevalence of dizziness and impaired postural balance in older patients receiving chemotherapy varied substantially depending on the measurement method, with higher rates in patient-reported outcomes. Certainty of evidence was low primarily due to limitations in outcome measures. Future studies should incorporate patient-reported outcome measures and a systematic objective baseline assessment for a comprehensive evaluation of these symptoms.
Trial registration: PROSPERO CRD42024585974.
老年癌症患者的头晕和平衡障碍尚未得到充分的研究。年龄相关因素、合并症和化疗可能导致其流行和严重程度,可能影响生活质量、增加跌倒风险和延迟治疗。关于这些症状的发生率和流行率的数据有限。本系统综述旨在总结证据并估计≥65岁接受化疗的癌症患者头晕或眩晕和姿势平衡受损的发生率和患病率。材料和方法我们检索了PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL和CINAHL于2025年5月,无日期和语言限制。包括横断面研究、队列研究、随机对照试验和混合方法研究,调查头晕或眩晕的发病率和/或患病率以及姿势平衡受损。采用反方差法进行随机效应meta分析。证据的确定性是通过分级建议评估和评价(GRADE)方法来评定的。结果从15614篇标题/摘要中筛选出14篇研究(1259名受试者)。发病率无法评估。研究报告了多种化疗方案的患病率,对每种方案提供了单独的估计。荟萃分析包括25例眩晕患病率估计和3例姿势平衡受损。眩晕的总患病率为15% (95% CI: 10% - 22%)。使用不良事件通用术语标准(CTCAE)评估者报告的患病率为11% (95% CI: 8% - 16%),而使用欧洲癌症化疗诱导周围神经病变研究和治疗组织问卷(EORTC QLQ-CIPN20)或自编问卷的患者报告患病率为35% (95% CI: 20% - 53%)。大多数研究表明存在较高的偏倚风险,而且由于评估者报告的测量方法非结构化,证据的确定性非常低。一项研究中,姿势平衡受损的患病率为48% (95% CI: 39% - 57%),证据的确定性较低。在不同的化疗方案中,头晕和姿势平衡受损的发生率没有显著差异。在接受化疗的老年患者中,眩晕和姿势平衡受损的患病率因测量方法的不同而有很大差异,在患者报告的结果中有较高的发生率。证据的确定性较低,主要是由于结果测量的局限性。未来的研究应纳入患者报告的结果测量和系统的客观基线评估,以全面评估这些症状。试验注册:PROSPERO CRD42024585974。
{"title":"Dizziness and impaired postural balance in older patients receiving chemotherapy treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Katrine Storm Piper ,&nbsp;Martine Puts ,&nbsp;Cecilia Lund ,&nbsp;Jesper Ryg ,&nbsp;Charlotte Suetta ,&nbsp;Hanne Elkjær Andersen ,&nbsp;Jakob Vasehus Schou ,&nbsp;Allan Madsen ,&nbsp;Jan Christensen","doi":"10.1016/j.jgo.2025.102816","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jgo.2025.102816","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Dizziness and balance impairments are underexplored symptoms in older adults with cancer. Age-related factors, comorbidities, and chemotherapy may contribute to its prevalence and severity, potentially affecting quality of life, increasing fall risk, and delaying treatment. Data on the incidence and prevalence of these symptoms are limited. This systematic review aimed to summarize the evidence and estimate the incidence and prevalence of dizziness or vertigo and impaired postural balance in patients with cancer ≥65 years receiving chemotherapy.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>We searched PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and CINAHL in May 2025 without date or language restrictions. Cross sectional studies, cohort studies, randomized controlled trials, and mixed method studies investigating incidence and/or prevalence of dizziness or vertigo and impaired postural balance were included. Random-effects meta-analysis, employing the inverse-variance method, was applied. Certainty of evidence was rated by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>From 15,614 title/abstracts screened, 14 studies (1259 participants) were included. Incidence could not be evaluated. Studies reporting prevalence across multiple chemotherapy regimens contributed separate estimates for each regimen. Meta-analysis included 25 prevalence estimates for dizziness and three for impaired postural balance. The pooled prevalence of dizziness was 15 % (95 % CI:10 %–22 %). Assessor-reported prevalence using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) was 11 % (95 % CI: 8 %–16 %), while patient-reported prevalence rate using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Chemotherapy Induced Peripheral Neuropathy Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-CIPN20), or a self-constructed questionnaire was 35 % (95 % CI: 20 %–53 %). Most studies demonstrated a high risk of bias, and certainty of evidence was very low due to unstructured assessor-reported measurement methods. Impaired postural balance prevalence from one study was 48 % (95 % CI: 39 %–57 %) with low certainty of evidence. Prevalence of dizziness and impaired postural balance did not differ significantly across chemotherapy regimens.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Prevalence of dizziness and impaired postural balance in older patients receiving chemotherapy varied substantially depending on the measurement method, with higher rates in patient-reported outcomes. Certainty of evidence was low primarily due to limitations in outcome measures. Future studies should incorporate patient-reported outcome measures and a systematic objective baseline assessment for a comprehensive evaluation of these symptoms.</div><div>Trial registration: PROSPERO CRD42024585974.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15943,"journal":{"name":"Journal of geriatric oncology","volume":"17 2","pages":"Article 102816"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145692902","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Development of a new model for prediction of relevant treatment related adverse events in older individuals with gastrointestinal cancers 开发一种预测老年胃肠道癌症患者相关治疗相关不良事件的新模型
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-05 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2025.102817
Vallish Shenoy , Sadhana Kannan , Vanita Noronha , Kumar Prabhash , Vikas Ostwal , Prabhat Bhargava , Anupa Pillai , K. Shamseeya , Ankush Shetake , Ratan Dhekale , Ankita Chitre , Vikram Gota , Sarika Mahajan , Anuradha Daptardar , Lekhika Sonkusare , Jayita Deodhar , Nabila Ansari , Manjusha Vagal , Purabi Mahajan , Manjunath Nookala , Anant Ramaswamy

Introduction

Limited tools exist to specifically predict the risk of chemotherapy toxicity and related events in older individuals with gastrointestinal (GI) cancers.

Materials and Methods

We evaluated patients aged ≥60 years with GI cancers who underwent a comprehensive geriatric assessment comprising demographic, cancer variables, and geriatric domains (function, comorbidities, nutritional status, medications, cognition, psychological status, and social support). A Cancer and Aging Research Group (CARG) score was calculated in all patients. The occurrence of grade 3 to 5 adverse events, emergent hospitalizations, and sudden death without identifiable adverse events were defined as treatment related adverse events (TRAE) to form the new predictive model. Based on initial univariate analysis of factors predicting for TRAE and then multivariate analysis, a nomogram was developed to predict the probability TRAEs. The total score derived from the nomogram was categorized into low, moderate, and high-risk groups based on a recursive partitioning algorithm.

Results

In total, 701 patients with a median age of 67 years (range, 60 to 88 years) with predominantly stage IV cancers (58 %) were analysed. The distribution of GI cancers was gastric and esophageal cancers (n = 349, 50 %), hepatobiliary and pancreatic cancers (n = 241, 34 %), and colorectal cancers (n = 84, 12 %). TRAE occurred in 53 % of the patients. A predictive model for TRAE was developed using the Mobility-Tiredness (Mob-T) Scale, hearing, cancer stage, site of primary, and chemotherapy dosing (standard or reduced). A predictive score in which the median risk score was 22 (range, 0 to 40) and risk stratification identified older adults at low risk (0 to 13 points; 17 %), intermediate risk (14 to 21 points; 40 %), or high risk (>22 points; 71 %) of chemotherapy toxicity (P < 0.001). The new model outperformed the CARG score based on ROC analysis (0.75 vs 0.59, p < 0.001).

Discussion

A new and simpler risk score predicts for chemotherapy related adverse events in older patients with GI cancers and seems to be more accurate than the CARG score. The score requires validation in prospective studies.
目前存在有限的工具来专门预测老年胃肠道(GI)癌症患者化疗毒性和相关事件的风险。材料和方法我们对年龄≥60岁的胃肠道癌症患者进行了全面的老年评估,包括人口统计学、癌症变量和老年领域(功能、合并症、营养状况、药物、认知、心理状态和社会支持)。计算所有患者的癌症和衰老研究组(CARG)评分。将发生3 ~ 5级不良事件、紧急住院和无可识别不良事件的猝死定义为治疗相关不良事件(TRAE),形成新的预测模型。在对TRAE的预测因素进行单因素分析和多因素分析的基础上,建立了预测TRAE概率的模态图。基于递归划分算法,从nomogram得出的总分分为低、中、高风险三组。结果共分析701例患者,中位年龄67岁(60 ~ 88岁),主要为IV期癌症(58%)。胃肠道肿瘤分布为胃癌和食管癌(n = 349,50 %)、肝胆癌和胰腺癌(n = 241,34 %)和结直肠癌(n = 84,12 %)。53%的患者发生TRAE。利用活动-疲劳(mobt)量表、听力、癌症分期、原发部位和化疗剂量(标准或减少)建立TRAE预测模型。中位风险评分为22分(范围0 ~ 40分)的预测评分和风险分层将老年人确定为低风险(0 ~ 13分;17%)、中风险(14 ~ 21分;40%)或高风险(22分;71%)的化疗毒性(P < 0.001)。新模型优于基于ROC分析的CARG评分(0.75 vs 0.59, p < 0.001)。一种新的、更简单的风险评分预测老年胃肠道肿瘤患者化疗相关不良事件,似乎比CARG评分更准确。该分数需要在前瞻性研究中验证。
{"title":"Development of a new model for prediction of relevant treatment related adverse events in older individuals with gastrointestinal cancers","authors":"Vallish Shenoy ,&nbsp;Sadhana Kannan ,&nbsp;Vanita Noronha ,&nbsp;Kumar Prabhash ,&nbsp;Vikas Ostwal ,&nbsp;Prabhat Bhargava ,&nbsp;Anupa Pillai ,&nbsp;K. Shamseeya ,&nbsp;Ankush Shetake ,&nbsp;Ratan Dhekale ,&nbsp;Ankita Chitre ,&nbsp;Vikram Gota ,&nbsp;Sarika Mahajan ,&nbsp;Anuradha Daptardar ,&nbsp;Lekhika Sonkusare ,&nbsp;Jayita Deodhar ,&nbsp;Nabila Ansari ,&nbsp;Manjusha Vagal ,&nbsp;Purabi Mahajan ,&nbsp;Manjunath Nookala ,&nbsp;Anant Ramaswamy","doi":"10.1016/j.jgo.2025.102817","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jgo.2025.102817","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Limited tools exist to specifically predict the risk of chemotherapy toxicity and related events in older individuals with gastrointestinal (GI) cancers.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>We evaluated patients aged ≥60 years with GI cancers who underwent a comprehensive geriatric assessment comprising demographic, cancer variables, and geriatric domains (function, comorbidities, nutritional status, medications, cognition, psychological status, and social support). A Cancer and Aging Research Group (CARG) score was calculated in all patients. The occurrence of grade 3 to 5 adverse events, emergent hospitalizations, and sudden death without identifiable adverse events were defined as treatment related adverse events (TRAE) to form the new predictive model. Based on initial univariate analysis of factors predicting for TRAE and then multivariate analysis, a nomogram was developed to predict the probability TRAEs. The total score derived from the nomogram was categorized into low, moderate, and high-risk groups based on a recursive partitioning algorithm.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In total, 701 patients with a median age of 67 years (range, 60 to 88 years) with predominantly stage IV cancers (58 %) were analysed. The distribution of GI cancers was gastric and esophageal cancers (<em>n</em> = 349, 50 %), hepatobiliary and pancreatic cancers (<em>n</em> = 241, 34 %), and colorectal cancers (<em>n</em> = 84, 12 %). TRAE occurred in 53 % of the patients. A predictive model for TRAE was developed using the Mobility-Tiredness (Mob-T) Scale, hearing, cancer stage, site of primary, and chemotherapy dosing (standard or reduced). A predictive score in which the median risk score was 22 (range, 0 to 40) and risk stratification identified older adults at low risk (0 to 13 points; 17 %), intermediate risk (14 to 21 points; 40 %), or high risk (&gt;22 points; 71 %) of chemotherapy toxicity (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). The new model outperformed the CARG score based on ROC analysis (0.75 vs 0.59, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>A new and simpler risk score predicts for chemotherapy related adverse events in older patients with GI cancers and seems to be more accurate than the CARG score. The score requires validation in prospective studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15943,"journal":{"name":"Journal of geriatric oncology","volume":"17 2","pages":"Article 102817"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145692903","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effects of a 12-week multicomponent exercise programme on physical function in older adults with cancer: Study protocol for the ONKO-FRAIL randomised controlled trial 为期12周的多组分运动计划对老年癌症患者身体功能的影响:onko -脆弱随机对照试验的研究方案
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-05 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2025.102818
Julia García-García , Ana Rodriguez-Larrad , Maren Martinez de Rituerto Zeberio , Jenifer Gómez Mediavilla , Borja López-San Vicente , Nuria Torrego Artola , Izaskun Zeberio Etxetxipia , Irati Garmendia , Ainhoa Alberro , David Otaegui , Francisco Borrego Rabasco , María M. Caffarel , Kalliopi Vrotsou , Jon Irazusta , Haritz Arrieta , Mireia Pelaez , Jon Belloso , Laura Basterretxea

Introduction

Cancer in older adults is often associated with functional limitations, geriatric syndromes, poor self-rated health, vulnerability, and frailty, and these conditions might worsen treatment-related side effects. Recent guidelines for patients with cancer during and after treatment have documented the beneficial effects of exercise to counteract certain side effects; however, little is known about the role of exercise during cancer treatment in older adults.

Materials and Methods

This is a multicentre randomised controlled trial in which 200 participants will be allocated to a control group or an intervention group (the sample size has been calculated to detect a clinical difference of 1 point in Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) score, assuming an α error of 0.05, a β error of 0.20, and a 10 % loss rate). Patients aged ≥70 years, diagnosed with any type of solid cancer and candidates for systemic treatment are eligible. Subjects in the intervention group are invited to participate in a 12-week supervised multicomponent exercise programme in addition to receiving usual care. Study assessments are conducted at baseline and three months. The primary outcome measure is physical function as assessed by the SPPB. Secondary outcome measures include comprehensive geriatric assessment scores (including social situation, basic and instrumental activities of daily living, cognitive function, depression, nutritional status, polypharmacy, geriatric syndromes, pain, and emotional distress), anthropometric characteristics, frailty status, physical fitness, physical activity, cognitive function, quality of life, fatigue, and nutritional status. Study assessments also include analysis of inflammatory, endocrine, and nutritional mediators in serum and plasma as potential frailty biomarkers at mRNA and protein levels and multiparametric flow cytometric analysis to measure immunosenescence markers on T and NK cells.

Discussion

This study seeks to extend our knowledge on exercise interventions during systemic anticancer treatment in patients over 70 years of age. Results from this research will guide the management of older adults during systemic treatment in hospitals seeking to enhance the standard of care.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05131113, November 11, 2021.
老年人的癌症通常与功能限制、老年综合征、自我评估健康状况不佳、易受伤害和虚弱有关,这些情况可能会加重治疗相关的副作用。最近针对癌症患者治疗期间和治疗后的指导方针记录了运动对抵消某些副作用的有益影响;然而,人们对运动在老年人癌症治疗中的作用知之甚少。材料和方法这是一项多中心随机对照试验,其中200名参与者将被分配到对照组或干预组(计算样本量以检测短体能性能电池(SPPB)评分1分的临床差异,假设α误差为0.05,β误差为0.20,损失率为10%)。年龄≥70岁,诊断为任何类型的实体癌,适合接受全身治疗的患者。干预组的受试者除了接受常规护理外,还被邀请参加为期12周的有监督的多成分锻炼计划。研究评估在基线和三个月时进行。主要指标是SPPB评估的身体功能。次要结局指标包括老年综合评估得分(包括社会状况、日常生活的基本和辅助活动、认知功能、抑郁、营养状况、多种药物、老年综合征、疼痛和情绪困扰)、人体测量特征、虚弱状态、身体健康、身体活动、认知功能、生活质量、疲劳和营养状况。研究评估还包括分析血清和血浆中的炎症、内分泌和营养介质作为mRNA和蛋白质水平的潜在脆弱生物标志物,以及多参数流式细胞术分析来测量T和NK细胞的免疫衰老标志物。本研究旨在扩展我们在70岁以上患者全身抗癌治疗中运动干预的知识。本研究的结果将指导医院在系统治疗期间老年人的管理,以提高护理标准。临床试验注册:clinicaltrials .gov标识符:NCT05131113, 2021年11月11日。
{"title":"Effects of a 12-week multicomponent exercise programme on physical function in older adults with cancer: Study protocol for the ONKO-FRAIL randomised controlled trial","authors":"Julia García-García ,&nbsp;Ana Rodriguez-Larrad ,&nbsp;Maren Martinez de Rituerto Zeberio ,&nbsp;Jenifer Gómez Mediavilla ,&nbsp;Borja López-San Vicente ,&nbsp;Nuria Torrego Artola ,&nbsp;Izaskun Zeberio Etxetxipia ,&nbsp;Irati Garmendia ,&nbsp;Ainhoa Alberro ,&nbsp;David Otaegui ,&nbsp;Francisco Borrego Rabasco ,&nbsp;María M. Caffarel ,&nbsp;Kalliopi Vrotsou ,&nbsp;Jon Irazusta ,&nbsp;Haritz Arrieta ,&nbsp;Mireia Pelaez ,&nbsp;Jon Belloso ,&nbsp;Laura Basterretxea","doi":"10.1016/j.jgo.2025.102818","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jgo.2025.102818","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Cancer in older adults is often associated with functional limitations, geriatric syndromes, poor self-rated health, vulnerability, and frailty, and these conditions might worsen treatment-related side effects. Recent guidelines for patients with cancer during and after treatment have documented the beneficial effects of exercise to counteract certain side effects; however, little is known about the role of exercise during cancer treatment in older adults.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>This is a multicentre randomised controlled trial in which 200 participants will be allocated to a control group or an intervention group (the sample size has been calculated to detect a clinical difference of 1 point in Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) score, assuming an α error of 0.05, a β error of 0.20, and a 10 % loss rate). Patients aged ≥70 years, diagnosed with any type of solid cancer and candidates for systemic treatment are eligible. Subjects in the intervention group are invited to participate in a 12-week supervised multicomponent exercise programme in addition to receiving usual care. Study assessments are conducted at baseline and three months. The primary outcome measure is physical function as assessed by the SPPB. Secondary outcome measures include comprehensive geriatric assessment scores (including social situation, basic and instrumental activities of daily living, cognitive function, depression, nutritional status, polypharmacy, geriatric syndromes, pain, and emotional distress), anthropometric characteristics, frailty status, physical fitness, physical activity, cognitive function, quality of life, fatigue, and nutritional status. Study assessments also include analysis of inflammatory, endocrine, and nutritional mediators in serum and plasma as potential frailty biomarkers at mRNA and protein levels and multiparametric flow cytometric analysis to measure immunosenescence markers on T and NK cells.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>This study seeks to extend our knowledge on exercise interventions during systemic anticancer treatment in patients over 70 years of age. Results from this research will guide the management of older adults during systemic treatment in hospitals seeking to enhance the standard of care.</div></div><div><h3>Trial registration</h3><div><span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span> Identifier: <span><span>NCT05131113</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>, November 11, 2021.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15943,"journal":{"name":"Journal of geriatric oncology","volume":"17 2","pages":"Article 102818"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145665429","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of geriatric oncology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1