首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Health Services Research & Policy最新文献

英文 中文
Trump and the future of health services research and policy in Europe: A view from the US. 特朗普与欧洲卫生服务研究和政策的未来:来自美国的观点。
IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-07 DOI: 10.1177/13558196251358621
Scott L Greer
{"title":"Trump and the future of health services research and policy in Europe: A view from the US.","authors":"Scott L Greer","doi":"10.1177/13558196251358621","DOIUrl":"10.1177/13558196251358621","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15953,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Services Research & Policy","volume":" ","pages":"209-211"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144584126","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
From purges to broken partnerships: an international response to the global impact of Trump's war on science. 从清洗到破裂的伙伴关系:国际社会对特朗普对科学战争的全球影响的回应。
IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-07 DOI: 10.1177/13558196251353692
Christina Pagel
{"title":"From purges to broken partnerships: an international response to the global impact of Trump's war on science.","authors":"Christina Pagel","doi":"10.1177/13558196251353692","DOIUrl":"10.1177/13558196251353692","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15953,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Services Research & Policy","volume":" ","pages":"212-214"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144584125","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Health care service interventions to improve the health care outcomes of hospitalised patients with extreme obesity: An evidence and gap map. 卫生保健服务干预措施改善住院极度肥胖患者的卫生保健结果:证据和差距图
IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-11 DOI: 10.1177/13558196251349448
Caz Hales, Rebecca Chrystall, Mona Jeffreys, Ruth Weatherall, Anne M Haase

ObjectivesWe set out to produce an evidence and gap map (EGM) on health care service interventions to improve health care outcomes for hospitalised patients with extreme obesity. Hospitalised patients with extreme obesity have poorer health care outcomes compared to normal weight patients. We also considered how hospital services can be coordinated and delivered to meet the care needs of patients with extreme obesity.MethodsA standardised five-stage EGM method was used to develop an intervention-outcome framework; identify current evidence; critically appraise the quality of evidence, extract, code, and summarise data in relation to the EGM objectives; and create a visualisation map to present findings. EPPI Reviewer Web software was used to generate an interactive EGM. The intervention-outcome framework was developed from internationally recognised health system performance and quality standards. This framework consisted of nine intervention (specialist workforce, special care pathways, assessment tools, equipment, moving and handling, specialist care areas, education, care bundles/packages, patient mobility) and six outcome categories (safety, effectiveness, efficiency, timely access, patient experience, health equity). Inclusion criteria were systematic reviews and primary studies that reported on health service interventions aimed to improve health care outcomes for patients with extreme obesity in the inpatient setting. Thirteen electronic databases were searched to identify studies for eligibility. The original searches were completed between November 2021 and March 2022. A repeat search was completed in August 2023.ResultsOf the 64,574 studies retrieved, 247 met eligibility criteria. Most of the excluded studies specifically related to bariatric weight loss surgical procedures or interventional techniques which could not be more broadly generalised to health care service provision. Of the 247 studies included, most studies (210; 85%) involved special care pathway interventions that related to specific points on a patient's health care journey such as peri-operative care, surgical recovery pathways, and airway support and pain management. Few studies focused on interventions related to a holistic patient-centred approach to care for patients with extreme obesity. Limited evidence existed on specific interventions that focused on safe moving and handling (26; 12.4%) and patient mobility (5; 2%). The most frequently measured outcomes were patient deterioration (193; 78%), patient injury (145; 59%) and medication safety (84; 34%).ConclusionsCurrent evidence predominantly focuses on isolated bariatric surgery patients rather than system-wide care delivery with a lack of evidence on addressing health care inequities between patients with extreme obesity and those of normal weight. This EGM provides an interactive resource to guide policymakers and service commissioners in developing comprehensive hospital services and to support clinicians

目的:我们着手制作医疗保健服务干预措施的证据和差距图(EGM),以改善住院极度肥胖患者的医疗保健结果。与正常体重的患者相比,极度肥胖的住院患者的医疗保健结果较差。我们还考虑了如何协调和提供医院服务,以满足极度肥胖患者的护理需求。方法采用标准化五阶段EGM方法建立干预-结果框架;确定现有证据;批判性地评估证据的质量,提取、编码和总结与环境评估目标相关的数据;并创建一个可视化地图来展示研究结果。使用EPPI Reviewer Web软件生成交互式EGM。干预-结果框架是根据国际公认的卫生系统绩效和质量标准制定的。该框架包括九项干预措施(专业人员队伍、特殊护理途径、评估工具、设备、移动和处理、专业护理领域、教育、护理包/包、患者流动性)和六项结果类别(安全、有效性、效率、及时获取、患者体验、卫生公平)。纳入标准是系统评价和初步研究,这些研究报告了旨在改善住院极度肥胖患者医疗保健结果的卫生服务干预措施。检索了13个电子数据库以确定合格的研究。最初的搜索在2021年11月至2022年3月之间完成。重复搜索于2023年8月完成。结果在检索到的64,574项研究中,247项符合入选标准。大多数被排除的研究专门与减肥外科手术或介入性技术有关,这些研究不能更广泛地推广到卫生保健服务提供。在纳入的247项研究中,大多数研究(210;85%)涉及与患者医疗保健过程中特定点相关的特殊护理途径干预,如围手术期护理、手术恢复途径、气道支持和疼痛管理。很少有研究关注与以患者为中心的整体方法治疗极端肥胖患者相关的干预措施。关于侧重于安全移动和处理的具体干预措施的证据有限(26;12.4%)和患者活动能力(5%;2%)。最常测量的结果是患者病情恶化(193;78%),患者损伤(145;59%)和用药安全(84%;34%)。结论:目前的证据主要集中在孤立的减肥手术患者,而不是整个系统的护理服务,缺乏解决极端肥胖患者和正常体重患者之间医疗保健不平等的证据。该EGM提供了一个互动资源,以指导决策者和服务专员发展综合医院服务,并支持临床医生实施协调的护理途径。研究人员可以使用这种EGM来确定和解决综合护理方法的证据差距。迫切需要开展研究,以制定基于证据的框架,以便在住院环境中提供安全、有尊严的护理。这将确保卫生保健系统能够在专门的减肥设置之外有效地支持极端肥胖患者。
{"title":"Health care service interventions to improve the health care outcomes of hospitalised patients with extreme obesity: An evidence and gap map.","authors":"Caz Hales, Rebecca Chrystall, Mona Jeffreys, Ruth Weatherall, Anne M Haase","doi":"10.1177/13558196251349448","DOIUrl":"10.1177/13558196251349448","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectivesWe set out to produce an evidence and gap map (EGM) on health care service interventions to improve health care outcomes for hospitalised patients with extreme obesity. Hospitalised patients with extreme obesity have poorer health care outcomes compared to normal weight patients. We also considered how hospital services can be coordinated and delivered to meet the care needs of patients with extreme obesity.MethodsA standardised five-stage EGM method was used to develop an intervention-outcome framework; identify current evidence; critically appraise the quality of evidence, extract, code, and summarise data in relation to the EGM objectives; and create a visualisation map to present findings. EPPI Reviewer Web software was used to generate an interactive EGM. The intervention-outcome framework was developed from internationally recognised health system performance and quality standards. This framework consisted of nine intervention (specialist workforce, special care pathways, assessment tools, equipment, moving and handling, specialist care areas, education, care bundles/packages, patient mobility) and six outcome categories (safety, effectiveness, efficiency, timely access, patient experience, health equity). Inclusion criteria were systematic reviews and primary studies that reported on health service interventions aimed to improve health care outcomes for patients with extreme obesity in the inpatient setting. Thirteen electronic databases were searched to identify studies for eligibility. The original searches were completed between November 2021 and March 2022. A repeat search was completed in August 2023.ResultsOf the 64,574 studies retrieved, 247 met eligibility criteria. Most of the excluded studies specifically related to bariatric weight loss surgical procedures or interventional techniques which could not be more broadly generalised to health care service provision. Of the 247 studies included, most studies (210; 85%) involved special care pathway interventions that related to specific points on a patient's health care journey such as peri-operative care, surgical recovery pathways, and airway support and pain management. Few studies focused on interventions related to a holistic patient-centred approach to care for patients with extreme obesity. Limited evidence existed on specific interventions that focused on safe moving and handling (26; 12.4%) and patient mobility (5; 2%). The most frequently measured outcomes were patient deterioration (193; 78%), patient injury (145; 59%) and medication safety (84; 34%).ConclusionsCurrent evidence predominantly focuses on isolated bariatric surgery patients rather than system-wide care delivery with a lack of evidence on addressing health care inequities between patients with extreme obesity and those of normal weight. This EGM provides an interactive resource to guide policymakers and service commissioners in developing comprehensive hospital services and to support clinicians","PeriodicalId":15953,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Services Research & Policy","volume":" ","pages":"282-291"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144266421","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A qualitative exploration of the perceived barriers and enablers of providing mental health care in rural Australian general practice. 对澳大利亚农村全科医生提供精神卫生保健的障碍和促进因素进行定性探讨。
IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-20 DOI: 10.1177/13558196251319654
Belinda Fuss, Tania Shelby-James, Sharon Lawn, Paul Worley, Sam Manger, Caroline Phegan, Megan Rattray

Objectives: General practice plays an important role in delivering and supporting mental health care within communities, particularly for those living in rural areas where access to specialised support is limited. This study sought to understand the barriers and facilitators to providing mental health care in rural Australian general practices. Methods: A descriptive qualitative study was undertaken involving online interviews with 14 staff at three rural Australian general practices between June and September 2023. Participants included nurses (n = 4), GPs, (n = 4), reception staff (n = 3) and practice managers (n = 3). Data were analysed using inductive thematic analysis. Results: Our analysis identified three themes: (i) systemic challenges and supportive infrastructure; (ii) health care personnel factors; and (iii) patient characteristics and preferences. Systemic challenges included limited access to services and specialist support, and challenges with information transmission, while the clinic location and set-up were seen as beneficial. Health care personnel factors included interpersonal needs and challenges, time constraints and how to balance care needs, and the difficulties of attracting and retaining a local workforce. Patient characteristics and preferences included societal stigma and individual hesitancy, lack of awareness, understanding and education around mental health and willingness and affordability of travel and using technology. Conclusions: Rural general practice in Australia faces a range of barriers and enablers that shape the provision of mental health care. To address these challenges, collaboration across various sectors will be required. Improving infrastructure, better resource allocation, addressing workforce shortages, reducing stigma, enhancing mental health literacy, and ensuring the accessibility of mental health care services are all crucial steps. It will be important to align policy goals across sectors to improve the delivery of mental health care in rural general practice in Australia.

目标:全科医生在社区内提供和支持精神卫生保健方面发挥着重要作用,特别是对那些生活在农村地区、获得专门支助的机会有限的人而言。本研究旨在了解在澳大利亚农村全科医生中提供精神卫生保健的障碍和促进因素。方法:在2023年6月至9月期间,对澳大利亚三家农村全科医院的14名工作人员进行了一项描述性定性研究。参与者包括护士(n = 4)、全科医生(n = 4)、接待人员(n = 3)和执业经理(n = 3)。数据采用归纳主题分析。结果:我们的分析确定了三个主题:(i)系统性挑战和支持性基础设施;㈡保健人员因素;(iii)患者的特征和偏好。系统挑战包括获得服务和专家支持的机会有限,以及信息传递方面的挑战,而诊所的位置和设置被认为是有益的。保健人员因素包括人际需求和挑战、时间限制和如何平衡护理需求,以及吸引和留住当地工作人员的困难。患者的特征和偏好包括社会耻辱和个人犹豫,缺乏对心理健康的认识、理解和教育,以及旅行和使用技术的意愿和负担能力。结论:澳大利亚农村全科医生面临着一系列障碍和促进因素,这些障碍和因素影响着精神卫生保健的提供。为了应对这些挑战,需要各部门之间的合作。改善基础设施、更好地分配资源、解决劳动力短缺问题、减少耻辱感、加强精神卫生知识普及以及确保获得精神卫生保健服务都是至关重要的步骤。重要的是协调各部门的政策目标,以改善澳大利亚农村全科医生提供的精神保健服务。
{"title":"A qualitative exploration of the perceived barriers and enablers of providing mental health care in rural Australian general practice.","authors":"Belinda Fuss, Tania Shelby-James, Sharon Lawn, Paul Worley, Sam Manger, Caroline Phegan, Megan Rattray","doi":"10.1177/13558196251319654","DOIUrl":"10.1177/13558196251319654","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> General practice plays an important role in delivering and supporting mental health care within communities, particularly for those living in rural areas where access to specialised support is limited. This study sought to understand the barriers and facilitators to providing mental health care in rural Australian general practices. <b>Methods:</b> A descriptive qualitative study was undertaken involving online interviews with 14 staff at three rural Australian general practices between June and September 2023. Participants included nurses (<i>n</i> = 4), GPs, (<i>n</i> = 4), reception staff (<i>n</i> = 3) and practice managers (<i>n</i> = 3). Data were analysed using inductive thematic analysis. <b>Results:</b> Our analysis identified three themes: (i) systemic challenges and supportive infrastructure; (ii) health care personnel factors; and (iii) patient characteristics and preferences. Systemic challenges included limited access to services and specialist support, and challenges with information transmission, while the clinic location and set-up were seen as beneficial. Health care personnel factors included interpersonal needs and challenges, time constraints and how to balance care needs, and the difficulties of attracting and retaining a local workforce. Patient characteristics and preferences included societal stigma and individual hesitancy, lack of awareness, understanding and education around mental health and willingness and affordability of travel and using technology. <b>Conclusions:</b> Rural general practice in Australia faces a range of barriers and enablers that shape the provision of mental health care. To address these challenges, collaboration across various sectors will be required. Improving infrastructure, better resource allocation, addressing workforce shortages, reducing stigma, enhancing mental health literacy, and ensuring the accessibility of mental health care services are all crucial steps. It will be important to align policy goals across sectors to improve the delivery of mental health care in rural general practice in Australia.</p>","PeriodicalId":15953,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Services Research & Policy","volume":" ","pages":"218-226"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12411677/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143458175","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Counseling and other factors associated with contraceptive use among active duty US military servicewomen. 与美国现役女性避孕相关的咨询和其他因素。
IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-21 DOI: 10.1177/13558196251344866
Kyle E Manetz, Anwar E Ahmed, Catherine T Witkop, Jaqueline E Hamrick, James D Mancuso

ObjectivesContraceptive prescriptions among U.S. service women rose to 68.7% between 2008 and 2013, which was higher than that seen nationally among women between 2017 and 2019 (65.3%). The objective of this study was to provide estimates of contraceptive use and its determinants among active duty service women, with a particular focus on the associations with contraceptive counseling.MethodsThis was a cross-sectional study using the 2018 Department of Defense Health Related Behaviors Survey of active duty service members. Data from 5353 active duty service women were analyzed. Weighted logistic regression models were used to identify factors associated with contraceptive use. We used a previous survey from 2015 to examine trends in contraceptive use.ResultsThe overall prevalence of contraceptive use was 60.6%, and only 40% had discussed contraception with a health care provider in the past year. Contraception counseling was associated with decreased contraceptive nonuse (adjusted odds ratio = 0.63). Being older, Black or Hispanic race or ethnicity, in the Army, enlisted, identifying as lesbian, gay, or bisexual, and having one or more same sex partners were associated with higher odds of contraceptive nonuse.ConclusionsDespite universal eligibility for free health care, contraceptive counseling and use among US military service women remain suboptimal, and significant disparities in contraceptive use exist by rank, race, ethnicity, and sexual orientation. Improving implementation and enforcement of existing military directives to provide routine contraceptive counseling and services during health care visits, such as through informatics tools, could lower unintended pregnancies, reduce inequities, and increase readiness.

2008年至2013年,美国服役女性的避孕处方率上升至68.7%,高于2017年至2019年全国女性的水平(65.3%)。本研究的目的是估计现役妇女避孕药具的使用情况及其决定因素,并特别关注与避孕咨询的关系。方法采用2018年美国国防部现役军人健康相关行为调查的横断面研究。研究人员分析了5353名现役女性的数据。使用加权逻辑回归模型来确定与避孕药使用相关的因素。我们使用了2015年的一项调查来检查避孕药具使用的趋势。结果全区避孕药具使用率为60.6%,近一年内与卫生保健提供者讨论过避孕药具的比例仅为40%。避孕咨询与减少不使用避孕药具相关(校正优势比= 0.63)。年龄较大、黑人或西班牙裔、在军队服役、被认定为女同性恋、男同性恋或双性恋、有一个或多个同性伴侣的人不使用避孕药具的几率较高。结论:尽管普遍享有免费医疗保健,但美国女兵避孕咨询和使用情况仍不理想,而且在避孕使用方面存在着军衔、种族、民族和性取向方面的显著差异。改进现有军事指令的实施和执行,例如通过信息学工具,在保健访问期间提供常规避孕咨询和服务,可以减少意外怀孕,减少不公平现象,并提高准备程度。
{"title":"Counseling and other factors associated with contraceptive use among active duty US military servicewomen.","authors":"Kyle E Manetz, Anwar E Ahmed, Catherine T Witkop, Jaqueline E Hamrick, James D Mancuso","doi":"10.1177/13558196251344866","DOIUrl":"10.1177/13558196251344866","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectivesContraceptive prescriptions among U.S. service women rose to 68.7% between 2008 and 2013, which was higher than that seen nationally among women between 2017 and 2019 (65.3%). The objective of this study was to provide estimates of contraceptive use and its determinants among active duty service women, with a particular focus on the associations with contraceptive counseling.MethodsThis was a cross-sectional study using the 2018 Department of Defense Health Related Behaviors Survey of active duty service members. Data from 5353 active duty service women were analyzed. Weighted logistic regression models were used to identify factors associated with contraceptive use. We used a previous survey from 2015 to examine trends in contraceptive use.ResultsThe overall prevalence of contraceptive use was 60.6%, and only 40% had discussed contraception with a health care provider in the past year. Contraception counseling was associated with decreased contraceptive nonuse (adjusted odds ratio = 0.63). Being older, Black or Hispanic race or ethnicity, in the Army, enlisted, identifying as lesbian, gay, or bisexual, and having one or more same sex partners were associated with higher odds of contraceptive nonuse.ConclusionsDespite universal eligibility for free health care, contraceptive counseling and use among US military service women remain suboptimal, and significant disparities in contraceptive use exist by rank, race, ethnicity, and sexual orientation. Improving implementation and enforcement of existing military directives to provide routine contraceptive counseling and services during health care visits, such as through informatics tools, could lower unintended pregnancies, reduce inequities, and increase readiness.</p>","PeriodicalId":15953,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Services Research & Policy","volume":" ","pages":"258-269"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144119871","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Tackling health inequalities: What exactly do we mean? Evidence from health policy in England. 解决健康不平等问题:我们到底是什么意思?来自英格兰卫生政策的证据。
IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-18 DOI: 10.1177/13558196251334571
Kath Checkland, Donna Bramwell, Jonathan Hammond, Simon Bailey, Lynsey Warwick-Giles

ObjectivesTo develop a model to support health systems in clarifying how they might target action to reduce health inequalities, and to use it to understand current policy on health inequalities in England.MethodsWe used the wider literature on the definitions of health inequalities to draw together a schematic model which attempts to link together the different conceptualisations of health inequalities present in the literature with potential sites of action that could be taken by local health systems. We then undertook a document analysis of the policy documents and programmes underlying the recent reorganisation of the NHS in England.ResultsThe need to tackle health inequalities is cited as one of the main rationales underlying the changes. However, there is a lack of clarity within the documents around: the type of inequality being addressed; the identification of the group(s) suffering from inequalities; and the ways in which the assumed ameliorative mechanisms will work in practice. The documents place considerable emphasis on the assumption that closer partnership working will address inequalities, although the mechanisms by which this will be achieved are not specified and previous research demonstrates how difficult this can be.ConclusionsThe aspiration to tackle health inequalities through newly constituted Integrated Care Systems and Boards is welcome. However, it is well known that the contribution that health care services can make to addressing inequalities is relatively limited. Greater clarity is required of policy and local strategy if efforts are to be appropriately targeted.

目的:开发一个模型,以支持卫生系统澄清他们如何有针对性地采取行动,以减少卫生不平等,并使用它来了解目前在英国的卫生不平等政策。方法我们利用关于卫生不平等定义的更广泛的文献来绘制一个示意图模型,该模型试图将文献中存在的卫生不平等的不同概念与当地卫生系统可以采取的潜在行动地点联系起来。然后,我们对最近英国NHS重组的政策文件和计划进行了文件分析。结果解决健康不平等的需要被认为是这些变化背后的主要理由之一。然而,在文件中缺乏明确的内容:要解决的不平等类型;确定遭受不平等的群体;以及假设的改善机制在实践中发挥作用的方式。这些文件相当强调这样一种假设,即更紧密的伙伴关系工作将解决不平等问题,尽管没有具体说明实现这一目标的机制,而且以前的研究表明这是多么困难。结论通过新成立的综合护理系统和委员会解决卫生不平等问题的愿望是受欢迎的。然而,众所周知,保健服务对解决不平等问题的贡献相对有限。如果要使各项努力有适当的目标,就需要使政策和地方战略更加明确。
{"title":"Tackling health inequalities: What exactly do we mean? Evidence from health policy in England.","authors":"Kath Checkland, Donna Bramwell, Jonathan Hammond, Simon Bailey, Lynsey Warwick-Giles","doi":"10.1177/13558196251334571","DOIUrl":"10.1177/13558196251334571","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectivesTo develop a model to support health systems in clarifying how they might target action to reduce health inequalities, and to use it to understand current policy on health inequalities in England.MethodsWe used the wider literature on the definitions of health inequalities to draw together a schematic model which attempts to link together the different conceptualisations of health inequalities present in the literature with potential sites of action that could be taken by local health systems. We then undertook a document analysis of the policy documents and programmes underlying the recent reorganisation of the NHS in England.ResultsThe need to tackle health inequalities is cited as one of the main rationales underlying the changes. However, there is a lack of clarity within the documents around: the type of inequality being addressed; the identification of the group(s) suffering from inequalities; and the ways in which the assumed ameliorative mechanisms will work in practice. The documents place considerable emphasis on the assumption that closer partnership working will address inequalities, although the mechanisms by which this will be achieved are not specified and previous research demonstrates how difficult this can be.ConclusionsThe aspiration to tackle health inequalities through newly constituted Integrated Care Systems and Boards is welcome. However, it is well known that the contribution that health care services can make to addressing inequalities is relatively limited. Greater clarity is required of policy and local strategy if efforts are to be appropriately targeted.</p>","PeriodicalId":15953,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Services Research & Policy","volume":" ","pages":"236-246"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12411678/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144024805","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The appropriateness of self-care policy for urinary tract infections among women from racialised minorities and low-income households in the United Kingdom: A qualitative study. 英国少数族裔和低收入家庭妇女尿路感染自我保健政策的适当性:一项定性研究。
IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-15 DOI: 10.1177/13558196251313736
Agata Pacho, Nicholas Mays, Rebecca E Glover

ObjectivesUrinary tract infections (UTIs) can negatively impact quality of life, especially when recurring. Patients often seek medical advice to relieve painful symptoms. UTIs are also the second most common reason antibiotics are prescribed in English primary care. However, overuse and long-term use of antibiotics for suspected UTIs in women can lead to antibiotic-resistant bacteria, making future treatments less effective. The UK's 2019-24 Antimicrobial Resistance National Action Plan aims to raise public awareness about the risks of overusing antibiotics and encourages self-care for minor infections, like uncomplicated UTIs. We explored how feasible and appropriate this approach is.MethodsThe transcripts from four online focus groups and 19 one-to-one online interviews involving 25 racialised minority and/or low-income women were analysed thematically. Meetings with lay members of the public with similar socio-demographics and experiences to those we planned on recruiting for the research helped to orientate the study, refine its materials and enhance its recruitment strategies.ResultsAll participants spoke about UTI-related anxieties, which they experienced differently depending on the frequency and the course of UTI episodes, and how knowledgeable they were about the symptoms. Participants often practised self-care for UTIs before seeking professional advice. They saw consultations with health care professionals as valuable for managing the symptoms of UTIs and navigating self-care options. Those with recurrent UTIs felt they could recognise when they required antibiotics and, therefore, they felt they could take responsibility for minimising overprescribing. Barriers to self-care included high pressure working days and not being able to take time off work to recover.ConclusionsParticipants in our study were often able to self-diagnose and assess the severity of their symptoms, which makes them partners in efforts to improve antibiotic stewardship. They still valued consulting professionals for advice and support about their UTIs, irrespective of whether they received a prescription.

目的:尿路感染(uti)会对生活质量产生负面影响,尤其是复发时。患者经常寻求医疗建议以缓解疼痛症状。尿路感染也是英国初级保健开出抗生素的第二大常见原因。然而,对疑似uti的妇女过度使用和长期使用抗生素可能导致抗生素耐药细菌,使未来的治疗效果降低。英国2019-24年抗菌素耐药性国家行动计划旨在提高公众对过度使用抗生素风险的认识,并鼓励对轻微感染(如简单的尿路感染)进行自我护理。我们探讨了这种方法的可行性和适当性。方法:对25名少数族裔和/或低收入妇女的4个在线焦点小组和19个一对一在线访谈的记录进行主题分析。与社会人口统计学和经验与我们计划为研究招募的人相似的非专业公众成员会面,有助于确定研究方向,完善材料并加强招募策略。结果:所有参与者都谈到了与尿路感染相关的焦虑,根据尿路感染发作的频率和过程,以及他们对症状的了解程度,他们经历的焦虑有所不同。参与者在寻求专业建议之前经常对尿路感染进行自我护理。他们认为与卫生保健专业人员进行咨询对于控制尿路感染的症状和指导自我保健选择是有价值的。那些患有复发性尿路感染的人认为他们可以识别出何时需要抗生素,因此,他们认为他们可以承担起最大限度地减少过度处方的责任。自我照顾的障碍包括工作压力大,不能抽出时间休息。结论:本研究的参与者通常能够自我诊断并评估其症状的严重程度,这使他们成为努力改善抗生素管理的合作伙伴。他们仍然重视向专业人士咨询有关尿路感染的建议和支持,无论他们是否收到处方。
{"title":"The appropriateness of self-care policy for urinary tract infections among women from racialised minorities and low-income households in the United Kingdom: A qualitative study.","authors":"Agata Pacho, Nicholas Mays, Rebecca E Glover","doi":"10.1177/13558196251313736","DOIUrl":"10.1177/13558196251313736","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectivesUrinary tract infections (UTIs) can negatively impact quality of life, especially when recurring. Patients often seek medical advice to relieve painful symptoms. UTIs are also the second most common reason antibiotics are prescribed in English primary care. However, overuse and long-term use of antibiotics for suspected UTIs in women can lead to antibiotic-resistant bacteria, making future treatments less effective. The UK's 2019-24 Antimicrobial Resistance National Action Plan aims to raise public awareness about the risks of overusing antibiotics and encourages self-care for minor infections, like uncomplicated UTIs. We explored how feasible and appropriate this approach is.MethodsThe transcripts from four online focus groups and 19 one-to-one online interviews involving 25 racialised minority and/or low-income women were analysed thematically. Meetings with lay members of the public with similar socio-demographics and experiences to those we planned on recruiting for the research helped to orientate the study, refine its materials and enhance its recruitment strategies.ResultsAll participants spoke about UTI-related anxieties, which they experienced differently depending on the frequency and the course of UTI episodes, and how knowledgeable they were about the symptoms. Participants often practised self-care for UTIs before seeking professional advice. They saw consultations with health care professionals as valuable for managing the symptoms of UTIs and navigating self-care options. Those with recurrent UTIs felt they could recognise when they required antibiotics and, therefore, they felt they could take responsibility for minimising overprescribing. Barriers to self-care included high pressure working days and not being able to take time off work to recover.ConclusionsParticipants in our study were often able to self-diagnose and assess the severity of their symptoms, which makes them partners in efforts to improve antibiotic stewardship. They still valued consulting professionals for advice and support about their UTIs, irrespective of whether they received a prescription.</p>","PeriodicalId":15953,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Services Research & Policy","volume":" ","pages":"189-197"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143006720","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
'Come and work here!' a qualitative exploration of local community-led initiatives to recruit and retain health care staff in remote and rural areas of the UK. 来这里工作!"对当地社区主导的招聘和留住英国偏远农村地区医护人员的举措进行定性探索。
IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-02 DOI: 10.1177/13558196251318607
Andrew Maclaren, Louise Locock, Zoë Skea, Lorraine Angell, Jennifer Cleland, Topher Dawson, Alan Denison, Christina Dobson, Rosemary Hollick, Peter Murchie, Diane Skåtun, Verity Watson

ObjectivesThe recruitment and retention of health care staff to remote and rural communities is a major challenge. This study explored the experiences of remote and rural communities in trying to attract and retain health care staff and their families in the UK.MethodsQualitative case studies in five remote and rural communities, two in England and three in Scotland. We conducted interviews with 22 participants across the five sites, including community members actively involved in recruitment and retention, health care professionals, and their family members. Fieldwork combined remote and in-person data collection. We used thematic analysis across cases drawing on asset-based community development as our theoretical framework.ResultsCommunities undertook various activities such as making promotional videos, social media campaigns, getting involved on interview panels, and informal social integration efforts. They drew on a range of local assets to encourage health care staff to come to the area, including showcasing local landscapes, outdoor activities, a safe, welcoming community for children and families, and good quality of life. They also drew on the skills of local people with backgrounds in marketing, design, communications and photography or film-making. The absence of some key assets posed challenges, particularly lack of housing, schooling provision, employment opportunities for other family members, and cultural activities. Community-led initiatives were often prompted by local dissatisfaction with health organisations' efforts to recruit health care staff, and a wish to exercise some control over recruitment initiatives. Activities were commonly driven by a small number of individuals. While this worked well in some communities, the burden of responsibility could be substantial. This also sometimes led to tension within communities. Retention efforts commonly relied on informal networks of key individuals who intentionally forged social links for incoming families.ConclusionsThere is a key role for communities to play in recruitment and retention in remote and rural regions. There is an opportunity to actively engage community members in collaboratively crafting a campaign that highlights the area's key attractions while being mindful of limitations on reliance on an asset-based approach. Retention is a neglected topic, relying on key individuals going out of their way to help newcomers integrate. The formation of a community stakeholder group could help formalise this and reduce reliance on the goodwill and energy of individuals.

目标:向偏远和农村社区招聘和留住保健工作人员是一项重大挑战。本研究探讨了偏远和农村社区在努力吸引和留住英国卫生保健人员及其家属方面的经验。方法:定性案例研究在五个偏远和农村社区,两个在英格兰和三个在苏格兰。我们对5个地点的22名参与者进行了访谈,包括积极参与招聘和留用的社区成员、卫生保健专业人员及其家庭成员。现场工作结合了远程和现场数据收集。我们利用基于资产的社区发展作为理论框架,对案例进行专题分析。结果:社区开展了各种活动,如制作宣传视频,社交媒体活动,参与访谈小组,以及非正式的社会融合努力。他们利用一系列当地资产来鼓励医护人员来到该地区,包括展示当地景观、户外活动、一个安全、欢迎儿童和家庭的社区,以及高质量的生活。他们还利用了当地有市场营销、设计、传播、摄影或电影制作背景的人的技能。缺乏一些关键资产构成了挑战,特别是缺乏住房、学校教育、其他家庭成员的就业机会和文化活动。社区主导的倡议往往是由于当地对卫生组织招聘医护人员的努力感到不满,并希望对招聘活动进行一定程度的控制。活动通常是由少数人驱动的。虽然这在一些社区运作良好,但责任负担可能很大。这有时也会导致社区内部的紧张局势。留住员工的努力通常依赖于关键人物的非正式网络,这些人有意为即将到来的家庭建立社会联系。结论:在偏远和农村地区,社区在招聘和留住人才方面发挥着关键作用。这是一个机会,让社区成员积极参与合作制定一项活动,突出该地区的主要吸引力,同时注意依赖基于资产的方法的局限性。留用是一个被忽视的话题,它依赖于关键人物不遗余力地帮助新人融入社会。一个社区利益相关者团体的形成可以帮助将这一点正式化,并减少对个人善意和精力的依赖。
{"title":"'Come and work here!' a qualitative exploration of local community-led initiatives to recruit and retain health care staff in remote and rural areas of the UK.","authors":"Andrew Maclaren, Louise Locock, Zoë Skea, Lorraine Angell, Jennifer Cleland, Topher Dawson, Alan Denison, Christina Dobson, Rosemary Hollick, Peter Murchie, Diane Skåtun, Verity Watson","doi":"10.1177/13558196251318607","DOIUrl":"10.1177/13558196251318607","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectivesThe recruitment and retention of health care staff to remote and rural communities is a major challenge. This study explored the experiences of remote and rural communities in trying to attract and retain health care staff and their families in the UK.MethodsQualitative case studies in five remote and rural communities, two in England and three in Scotland. We conducted interviews with 22 participants across the five sites, including community members actively involved in recruitment and retention, health care professionals, and their family members. Fieldwork combined remote and in-person data collection. We used thematic analysis across cases drawing on asset-based community development as our theoretical framework.ResultsCommunities undertook various activities such as making promotional videos, social media campaigns, getting involved on interview panels, and informal social integration efforts. They drew on a range of local assets to encourage health care staff to come to the area, including showcasing local landscapes, outdoor activities, a safe, welcoming community for children and families, and good quality of life. They also drew on the skills of local people with backgrounds in marketing, design, communications and photography or film-making. The absence of some key assets posed challenges, particularly lack of housing, schooling provision, employment opportunities for other family members, and cultural activities. Community-led initiatives were often prompted by local dissatisfaction with health organisations' efforts to recruit health care staff, and a wish to exercise some control over recruitment initiatives. Activities were commonly driven by a small number of individuals. While this worked well in some communities, the burden of responsibility could be substantial. This also sometimes led to tension within communities. Retention efforts commonly relied on informal networks of key individuals who intentionally forged social links for incoming families.ConclusionsThere is a key role for communities to play in recruitment and retention in remote and rural regions. There is an opportunity to actively engage community members in collaboratively crafting a campaign that highlights the area's key attractions while being mindful of limitations on reliance on an asset-based approach. Retention is a neglected topic, relying on key individuals going out of their way to help newcomers integrate. The formation of a community stakeholder group could help formalise this and reduce reliance on the goodwill and energy of individuals.</p>","PeriodicalId":15953,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Services Research & Policy","volume":" ","pages":"180-188"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12134402/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143537237","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The views of older people on community-based multi-disciplinary team caseloads and informal carers about health and care services in two Integrated Care Pioneer sites in England. 老年人对基于社区的多学科小组病例量和非正式护理人员对英格兰两个综合护理先锋站点的保健和护理服务的看法。
IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-19 DOI: 10.1177/13558196251349400
Mary Alison Durand, Lavanya Thana, Mustafa Al-Haboubi, Agata Pacho, Lucia Rehackova, Gerald Wistow, Nick Douglas, Nicholas Mays

Objectives: Community-based multi-disciplinary teams (MDTs) were among the most widely reported health and care integration initiatives in the Integrated Care Pioneers in England. Such MDTs bring together staff from different sectors to co-ordinate and plan care for patients, who are often older, have multiple long-term conditions and risk hospital admission. As part of our evaluation of MDTs in two contrasting Pioneers, we explored MDT patients' and informal carers' perspectives on health and care services. As the COVID-19 pandemic started during data collection, we also wanted to understand its impact on patients' access to services. Methods: We conducted qualitative interviews with 44 patients aged 60 or over, with long-term conditions, and on the caseload of one of 11 participating MDTs. We also undertook qualitative interviews with 15 carers. Interviews took place between November 2019 and March 2021. Interview transcripts were coded in NVivo-12 and analysed thematically. Results: In addition to formal services, patients often relied on informal care. Valued aspects of care included equipment and home modifications that supported independence, timely access to and continuity in care, effective information-sharing, professionals who made them feel that their needs mattered, and having a named contact. Where challenges were experienced (e.g. with accessing professionals, communication, and care quality), patients and carers sometimes felt abandoned. While some patients mentioned being on an MDT caseload, few reported having a care plan. The impacts of caring on informal carers were sometimes considerable. COVID-19 affected patient and carer wellbeing, but the new ways of accessing care generated by the pandemic were valued by some participants. Conclusions: As long as challenges remain, patients and carers are unlikely to perceive care as joined-up and patient-centred. If truly integrated and holistic care is to be provided, barriers (such as the lack of shared patient records) must be addressed. Even where MDTs function primarily to co-ordinate rather than deliver care, they could better communicate their co-ordinating role, and MDT discussion outcomes, including care decisions, to patients. Informal carers' needs also require greater attention by MDTs.

目标:以社区为基础的多学科团队(MDTs)是英国综合护理先驱中报告最广泛的保健和护理整合举措之一。这种mdt将来自不同部门的工作人员聚集在一起,协调和规划对患者的护理,这些患者往往年龄较大,患有多种长期疾病,并有住院的风险。作为我们在两个对比鲜明的先锋中对MDT进行评估的一部分,我们探讨了MDT患者和非正式护理人员对健康和护理服务的看法。由于COVID-19大流行在数据收集期间开始,我们还希望了解其对患者获得服务的影响。方法:我们对44名年龄在60岁或以上的长期患者进行了定性访谈,并对11名参与MDTs中的1名进行了病例量访谈。我们还对15名护理人员进行了定性访谈。采访于2019年11月至2021年3月期间进行。访谈记录在NVivo-12中编码,并按主题进行分析。结果:除正规服务外,患者往往依赖于非正规护理。护理的重要方面包括支持独立性的设备和家庭改造,及时获得和持续的护理,有效的信息共享,使他们感到他们的需求受到重视的专业人员,以及有一个指定的联系人。在遇到挑战的地方(例如在获得专业人员、沟通和护理质量方面),患者和护理人员有时会感到被抛弃。虽然一些患者提到正在接受联合化疗,但很少有人报告有护理计划。照顾对非正式照顾者的影响有时是相当大的。COVID-19影响了患者和护理人员的福祉,但一些与会者重视大流行带来的获得护理的新途径。结论:只要挑战仍然存在,患者和护理人员就不太可能将护理视为联合和以患者为中心的。如果要提供真正的综合和全面的护理,就必须解决障碍(例如缺乏共享的患者记录)。即使在MDT主要是协调而不是提供护理的地方,他们也可以更好地向患者传达他们的协调作用,以及MDT讨论的结果,包括护理决定。非正式照护者的需求也需要mdt给予更多的关注。
{"title":"The views of older people on community-based multi-disciplinary team caseloads and informal carers about health and care services in two Integrated Care Pioneer sites in England.","authors":"Mary Alison Durand, Lavanya Thana, Mustafa Al-Haboubi, Agata Pacho, Lucia Rehackova, Gerald Wistow, Nick Douglas, Nicholas Mays","doi":"10.1177/13558196251349400","DOIUrl":"10.1177/13558196251349400","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> Community-based multi-disciplinary teams (MDTs) were among the most widely reported health and care integration initiatives in the Integrated Care Pioneers in England. Such MDTs bring together staff from different sectors to co-ordinate and plan care for patients, who are often older, have multiple long-term conditions and risk hospital admission. As part of our evaluation of MDTs in two contrasting Pioneers, we explored MDT patients' and informal carers' perspectives on health and care services. As the COVID-19 pandemic started during data collection, we also wanted to understand its impact on patients' access to services. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted qualitative interviews with 44 patients aged 60 or over, with long-term conditions, and on the caseload of one of 11 participating MDTs. We also undertook qualitative interviews with 15 carers. Interviews took place between November 2019 and March 2021. Interview transcripts were coded in NVivo-12 and analysed thematically. <b>Results:</b> In addition to formal services, patients often relied on informal care. Valued aspects of care included equipment and home modifications that supported independence, timely access to and continuity in care, effective information-sharing, professionals who made them feel that their needs mattered, and having a named contact. Where challenges were experienced (e.g. with accessing professionals, communication, and care quality), patients and carers sometimes felt abandoned. While some patients mentioned being on an MDT caseload, few reported having a care plan. The impacts of caring on informal carers were sometimes considerable. COVID-19 affected patient and carer wellbeing, but the new ways of accessing care generated by the pandemic were valued by some participants. <b>Conclusions:</b> As long as challenges remain, patients and carers are unlikely to perceive care as joined-up and patient-centred. If truly integrated and holistic care is to be provided, barriers (such as the lack of shared patient records) must be addressed. Even where MDTs function primarily to co-ordinate rather than deliver care, they could better communicate their co-ordinating role, and MDT discussion outcomes, including care decisions, to patients. Informal carers' needs also require greater attention by MDTs.</p>","PeriodicalId":15953,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Services Research & Policy","volume":"30 1_suppl","pages":"48S-57S"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12423458/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144667800","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evaluating the role of community-based multi-disciplinary teams in integrated health and social care in England: Overview of findings from the Pioneer evaluation and their implications for health and social care integration. 评估基于社区的多学科团队在英格兰综合健康和社会护理中的作用:先锋评估结果概述及其对健康和社会护理综合的影响。
IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-19 DOI: 10.1177/13558196251349398
Mary Alison Durand, Gerald Wistow, Mustafa Al Haboubi, Nick Douglas, Bob Erens, Ties Hoomans, Tommaso Manacorda, Robin Miller, Agata Pacho, Lucia Rehackova, Judith Smith, Lavanya Thana, Nicholas Mays

ObjectivesThis paper synthesises the findings of an evaluation of community-based multi-disciplinary teams (MDTs), primarily serving older people with long-term conditions, undertaken as part of a wider evaluation (2015-2022) of the Integrated Care and Support Pioneer Programme (2013-2018) in England. The MDT evaluation was undertaken in two contrasting Pioneers with 11 MDTs covering four models of MDT functioning.MethodsThe synthesis, set against our conceptual framework of MDT functioning, draws principally on the findings of semi-structured interviews with local strategic level health and care leaders, frontline MDT staff, and patients and their informal carers, observations of MDT meetings, and an online survey of MDT staff.ResultsMDTs were seen as an essential means of working towards local health and care integration. While local contexts shaped the precise aims, structure, composition and ways of working of the different MDT models studied, there were strong similarities across the teams in how staff viewed the nature and benefits of MDT working. MDTs were perceived as having the potential to provide more holistic care to patients, speed up access to care, improve access to a wider range of services and enhance care at home. Benefits to staff included better information sharing; reduced duplication of tasks; enhanced collective responsibility and problem-solving, which enriched decision-making; opportunities to learn from, and about, the remits of other professional groups and services; and the erosion of traditional professional hierarchies. However, barriers to MDT working, including the absence of shared patient records, inadequate infrastructure and resources, and concerns about the ability to measure and demonstrate the value of MDT working, were also identified. Patients and their informal carers reported valuing good communication with their health and care providers but often appeared unaware of an MDT's involvement in planning their care. This suggests there is some distance to travel in terms of how MDTs communicate their roles to those they serve.ConclusionsAt the service delivery level, our findings' implications for policy and practice include the need for greater integration across patient records and data systems, and greater investment in specialist services (e.g., housing) currently absent from MDTs. However, our research also highlighted challenges to evaluating the outcomes of 'integration' both as a concept and at the service delivery level. Changes to both the research environment and the approach to evaluation are also warranted.

本文综合了基于社区的多学科团队(MDTs)的评估结果,主要为长期患病的老年人服务,作为英国综合护理和支持先锋计划(2013-2018)更广泛评估(2015-2022)的一部分。MDT评估是在两个对比的先锋中进行的,11个MDT涵盖了MDT功能的四种模型。方法根据我们的MDT功能概念框架,综合研究主要基于对当地战略级卫生和护理领导者、一线MDT工作人员、患者及其非正式护理人员的半结构化访谈、MDT会议观察和MDT工作人员在线调查的结果。结果医疗辅助治疗被视为实现地方卫生保健一体化的重要手段。虽然当地环境决定了所研究的不同MDT模型的精确目标、结构、组成和工作方式,但在工作人员如何看待MDT工作的性质和好处方面,整个团队都有很强的相似性。人们认为,mdt有可能为患者提供更全面的护理,加快获得护理的速度,改善获得更广泛服务的机会,并加强家庭护理。对工作人员的好处包括更好地分享信息;减少重复工作;加强集体责任和解决问题,丰富决策;向其他专业团体和服务机构学习的机会;以及传统职业等级制度的侵蚀。然而,也发现了MDT工作的障碍,包括缺乏共享的患者记录,基础设施和资源不足,以及对衡量和证明MDT工作价值的能力的担忧。病人和他们的非正式照护者报告重视与他们的健康和照护提供者的良好沟通,但往往似乎没有意识到MDT参与规划他们的照护。这表明在mdt如何向他们所服务的对象传达他们的角色方面还有一段距离要走。在服务提供层面,我们的研究结果对政策和实践的影响包括需要在患者记录和数据系统之间进行更大的整合,以及对目前mdt缺乏的专业服务(例如住房)进行更大的投资。然而,我们的研究也强调了评估“整合”作为一个概念和服务交付水平的结果所面临的挑战。研究环境和评估方法的改变也是必要的。
{"title":"Evaluating the role of community-based multi-disciplinary teams in integrated health and social care in England: Overview of findings from the Pioneer evaluation and their implications for health and social care integration.","authors":"Mary Alison Durand, Gerald Wistow, Mustafa Al Haboubi, Nick Douglas, Bob Erens, Ties Hoomans, Tommaso Manacorda, Robin Miller, Agata Pacho, Lucia Rehackova, Judith Smith, Lavanya Thana, Nicholas Mays","doi":"10.1177/13558196251349398","DOIUrl":"10.1177/13558196251349398","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectivesThis paper synthesises the findings of an evaluation of community-based multi-disciplinary teams (MDTs), primarily serving older people with long-term conditions, undertaken as part of a wider evaluation (2015-2022) of the Integrated Care and Support Pioneer Programme (2013-2018) in England. The MDT evaluation was undertaken in two contrasting Pioneers with 11 MDTs covering four models of MDT functioning.MethodsThe synthesis, set against our conceptual framework of MDT functioning, draws principally on the findings of semi-structured interviews with local strategic level health and care leaders, frontline MDT staff, and patients and their informal carers, observations of MDT meetings, and an online survey of MDT staff.ResultsMDTs were seen as an essential means of working towards local health and care integration. While local contexts shaped the precise aims, structure, composition and ways of working of the different MDT models studied, there were strong similarities across the teams in how staff viewed the nature and benefits of MDT working. MDTs were perceived as having the potential to provide more holistic care to patients, speed up access to care, improve access to a wider range of services and enhance care at home. Benefits to staff included better information sharing; reduced duplication of tasks; enhanced collective responsibility and problem-solving, which enriched decision-making; opportunities to learn from, and about, the remits of other professional groups and services; and the erosion of traditional professional hierarchies. However, barriers to MDT working, including the absence of shared patient records, inadequate infrastructure and resources, and concerns about the ability to measure and demonstrate the value of MDT working, were also identified. Patients and their informal carers reported valuing good communication with their health and care providers but often appeared unaware of an MDT's involvement in planning their care. This suggests there is some distance to travel in terms of how MDTs communicate their roles to those they serve.ConclusionsAt the service delivery level, our findings' implications for policy and practice include the need for greater integration across patient records and data systems, and greater investment in specialist services (e.g., housing) currently absent from MDTs. However, our research also highlighted challenges to evaluating the outcomes of 'integration' both as a concept and at the service delivery level. Changes to both the research environment and the approach to evaluation are also warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":15953,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Services Research & Policy","volume":"30 1_suppl","pages":"69S-81S"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12423453/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144667796","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Health Services Research & Policy
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1