Journal of Hypertension最新文献

Objective: It remains unclear whether the hemodynamic effects of isometric handgrip exercise (IHG) are comparable to those of aerobic exercise (AE). This study investigated the efficacy of IHG in reducing central and ambulatory blood pressure in older hypertensive participants and compared its effects with AE.

Methods: In a three-arm randomized controlled trial, 54 older hypertensive participants (age range: ≥60; mean age: 69 years) underwent 12 weeks of either IHG training ( n  = 17), AE training ( n  = 19), or were part of a no-exercise control group ( n  = 18). IHG participants engaged in bilateral handgrips using a digital device, four times for 2 min each at 30% of maximal voluntary contraction. AE participants undertook brisk walking and cycling exercises at moderate intensity for 30 min, thrice weekly. Baseline and postintervention measurements included resting office, central, and 24-h ambulatory blood pressures.

Results: Both IHG and AE interventions led to significant reductions in office and ambulatory systolic blood pressure compared to control group ( P  < 0.05 for both), with no marked difference in the magnitude of systolic blood pressure reductions between the two groups. Notably, the IHG group exhibited greater reductions in office, central, and ambulatory diastolic blood pressure compared to the AE group and control group.

Conclusion: While both IHG and AE effectively lowered ambulatory systolic blood pressure, IHG demonstrated superior efficacy in reducing central and ambulatory diastolic blood pressure. Consequently, IHG training presents a promising alternative antihypertensive therapy for hypertensive participants over the age of 60.

Background and aims: Multiple randomized trials have shown that renal denervation (RDN) reduces blood pressure (BP) when compared with sham control but the antihypertensive efficacy of radiofrequency vs. ultrasound-based RDN is uncertain. We aimed to compare the outcomes of radiofrequency RDN (rRDN) and ultrasound RDN (uRDN), when compared with sham in patients with hypertension.

Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, and clinicaltrials.gov databases were searched for randomized sham-controlled trials (RCTs) of rRDN or uRDN or for trials of rRDN vs. uRDN. Primary efficacy outcome was 24-h ambulatory SBP. A mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis was performed comparing the efficacy and safety against sham and against each other.

Results: Among 13 RCTs that enrolled 2285 hypertensive patients, rRDN reduced 24-h ambulatory SBP [(MD = 2.34 mmHg; 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.72-3.95], office SBP (MD = 5.04 mmHg; 95% CI: 2.68-7.40)], and office DBP (MD = 2.95 mmHg; 95% CI: 1.68-4.22) when compared with sham. Similarly, uRDN reduced 24-h ambulatory SBP (MD = 4.74 mmHg; 95% CI: 2.80-6.67), day-time ambulatory SBP (MD = 5.40 mmHg; 95% CI: 3.68-7.13), night-time ambulatory SBP (MD = 3.84 mmHg; 95% CI: 0.02-7.67), and office SBP (3.98 mmHg; 95% CI: 0.78-7.19) when compared with sham. There was significantly greater reduction in 24-h ambulatory SBP (MD = 2.40 mmHg; 95% CI: 0.09-4.71), day-time ambulatory SBP (MD = 4.09 mmHg; 95% CI: 1.61-6.56), and night-time ambulatory SBP (MD = 5.76 mmHg; 95% CI: 0.48-11.0) with uRDN when compared with rRDN. For primary efficacy outcome, uRDN ranked #1, followed by rRDN (#2), and sham (#3).

Conclusion: In hypertensive patients, rRDN and uRDN significantly reduced 24-h ambulatory and office SBP when compared with sham control with significantly greater reduction in ambulatory BP with uRDN than with rRDN at 4 months (mean) of follow-up. A large-scale randomized head-to-head trial of rRDN or uRDN is warranted to evaluate if there are differences in efficacy.

Background: Effective patient-centered care requires an adequate understanding of patient preferences for different therapeutic options. We modelled patient preference for blood pressure (BP) management by pharmaceutical or interventional treatments such as renal denervation in patients with different profiles of uncontrolled hypertension.

Methods: Modeling was based on the findings from a previously conducted quantitative discrete choice experiment (DCE). The likelihood of selecting either an interventional treatment option or additional antihypertensive medication option was calculated for three patient profiles that represent the range of patients with hypertension commonly encountered in clinical practice: treatment-naive, patients with uncontrolled BP while on one to three antihypertensive medications, and patients with drug-resistant hypertension. Variables in the preference model were treatment attributes from the DCE study: expected reduction in office SBP with each treatment, duration of treatment effect, risk of reversible drug side effects from drugs, and risk of temporary pain and/or bruising or vascular injury from interventions. Values of the variables were derived from published clinical studies or expert opinion.

Results: The model predicted that the likelihood of choosing an intervention over initiating pharmacotherapy was 17.2% for previously untreated patients, 23.7% for patients with moderate hypertension currently on pharmacotherapy, and 41.8% for patients with drug-resistant hypertension. The dominant variable driving preference in these models was the expected BP reduction. Patient preferences for intervention are greater when drug nonadherence or increased SBP reduction at 3 vs. 1 year are included in the model. Baseline BP, drug side effects, or risks of the procedure had little influence on decisions.

Conclusion: Modeling using patient preference weights predicts that a substantial minority of patients favor an interventional treatment such as renal denervation over initiation or escalation of medications. Awareness of a patient's interest in device-based versus pharmaceutical strategies should inform the shared decision-making process for hypertension treatment.

Background: Preventing high blood pressure and its complications requires identifying its risk factors. This study assessed predictors of hypertension and its associated complications among Emirati adults in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates (UAE).

Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted by retrieving data from the Electronic Medical Records (EMR) of Emiratis who participated in a national cardiovascular screening program between 2011 and 2013. The study cohort comprised 8456 Emirati adults (18 years and above): 4095 women and 4361 men. The average follow-up period was 9.2 years, with a maximum of 12 years.

Results: The age-adjusted hypertension prevalence in Abu Dhabi increased from 24.5% at baseline to 35.2% in 2023. At baseline, 61.8% of hypertensive patients had controlled blood pressure, which increased to 74.3% in 2023. Among those free from hypertension at screening, 835 patients (12.3%) were newly diagnosed during the follow-up period. Using Cox regression, the hypertension prediction model developed included age [ P value <0.001, hazard ratio 1.051, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.046-1.056], SBP ( P value <0.001, hazard ratio 1.017, 95% CI 1.011-1.023) and DBP ( P value <0.001, hazard ratio 1.029, 95% CI 1.02-1.037), glycated hemoglobin ( P  < 0.001, hazard ratio 1.132, 95% CI 1.077-1.191), and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) ( P value <0.001, hazard ratio 0.662, 95% CI 0.526-0.832). This prediction model had a c-statistic of 0.803 (95% CI 0.786-0.819). Using survival analysis (Kaplan-Meier), higher blood pressure was associated with more cardiovascular events and mortality during follow-up.

Conclusion: Targeting population-specific predictors of hypertension can prevent its progression and inform healthcare professionals and policymakers to decrease the incidence, complications, and mortality related to hypertension.

Background: Patients with solitary functioning kidney appear to be exposed to an increased cardiovascular risk. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of peripheral and central blood pressure on subclinical cardiovascular organ damage in a sample of children and adolescents with solitary functioning kidney.

Methods: Carotid ultrasonography was performed to measure the carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) and the carotid distensibility coefficient. The carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV) was assessed by tonometry. Cardiac mass and remodeling were estimated using transthoracic echocardiography. Central and peripheral (both office and 24-h ambulatory) BP measurements were collected.

Results: Forty-four patients were included. Eighteen subjects (45%) were hypertensive as assessed by 24-h ABPM, with a prevalence of masked hypertension of 43%. Twenty-three subjects (52%) had an increased cIMT, while 2 and 3 patients (5% and 7%) demonstrated an impaired carotid distensibility coefficient and PWV, respectively. Nineteen subjects (43%) showed concentric cardiac remodeling. Central systolic blood pressure (cSBP) correlated with cIMT (r = 0.35) and left ventricular mass index (LVMi) (r = 0.32) demonstrating a positive independent association with an increased cIMT (odds ratio 1.14, 95% confidence interval 1.01-1.29) in multivariate regression analysis.

Conclusion: Children and adolescents with solitary functioning kidney exhibited a high prevalence of masked hypertension and subclinical cardiovascular organ damage. These findings support the use of 24-h ABPM to identify patients with a higher cardiovascular risk who would benefit from hypertension treatment and closer monitoring during growth and into adulthood. Additionally, cSBP measurement should be considered as part of a more detailed cardiovascular risk assessment in these patients.

Background: Preeclampsia (PE) is marked by hypertension and detrimental sterile inflammatory response. Despite the reported anti-inflammatory effect of pyridostigmine bromide (PYR) in different models, its anti-inflammatory mechanism in PE is unclear. This study assessed whether such an anti-inflammatory effect involves inhibition of placental Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) signaling.

Methods: Placental TLR4 expression and its signaling were assessed respectively in PE women and Sprague-Dawley rats with reduced uterine perfusion pressure (RUPP) induced on gestational day14 (GD14). RUPP and lipopolysaccharides (LPS, 5 μg/kg)-induced PE rats were treated with a selective TLR4 signaling inhibitor (TAK-242, 2.5 mg/kg/day). The effect of PYR (20 mg/kg/day) on TLR4 expression and signaling was also assessed in RUPP or LPS-infused rats. On GD19, rats' mean arterial pressure (MAP) and samples were collected and processed. At the cellular level, the effect of acetylcholine (ACh), the indirect by-product of PYR activity, on LPS-stimulated HTR-8/SVneo cells was assessed.

Results: Both PE women and RUPP rats had increased (P  < 0.05) placental TLR4 expression and elevated (P  < 0.05) MAP. Selective inhibition of TLR4 signaling with TAK-242 blunted (P < 0.05) RUPP-elevated MAP. Activation of TLR4 induced PE-like symptoms in dams, which were prevented by TAK-242. PYR reduced (P < 0.05) MAP and downregulated placental TLR4 expression and TLR4/TRAF6/NF-κB signaling-mediated inflammation in RUPP and in response to TLR4 selective activation. ACh inhibited the same signaling pathway in LPS-stimulated HTR-8 in vitro.

Conclusion: Our data support that PYR attenuates placental TLR4 expression and inhibits TLR4/TRAF6/NF-κB signaling pathway-mediated inflammation in RUPP, clarifying the anti-inflammatory mechanisms of PYR in the PE rat model.

Objective: Interarm systolic blood pressure difference (IASD) values >15 mmHg (IASD > 15) are associated with increased cardiovascular risk, yet the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. This report evaluated whether IASD >15, assessed by different protocols [sequential or simultaneous; based on one or several blood pressure (BP) readings], was associated with adverse left ventricular (LV) remodeling.

Methods: This cross-sectional study evaluated 605 individuals who underwent clinical and echocardiography evaluation and three pairs of simultaneous arm BP readings. IASD was estimated by seven distinct protocols (three simultaneous and four sequential BP measurements criteria).

Results: The cohort had a mean age of 53.5 ± 15.4 years, with 51% being women, 23% with LV hypertrophy, 14% with LV concentricity, 69% with normal geometry, 8% with concentric remodeling, 17% with eccentric hypertrophy and 6% with concentric hypertrophy. Multivariable logistic regression revealed that IASD >15 defined by simultaneous measures of the last two pairs of BP readings (IASDsim2) and sequential arm BP readings (right-left-right arm sequence; IASDseq3) were related to LV concentricity (odds ratio [95% CI] = 3.24 [1.02-10.28], P  = 0.046 and 2.56 [1.09-6.00], P  = 0.030, respectively) and LV concentric remodeling (odds ratio [95% CI]  = 4.12 [1.08-15.78], P  = 0.039 and 4.16 [1.61-10.76], P  = 0.003, respectively). Conversely, IASD >15 defined by any criteria showed no association with LV hypertrophy.

Conclusion: Individuals with IASD >15 defined by IASDsim2 and IASDseq3 are associated with adverse LV remodeling, namely LV concentricity and LV concentric remodeling. These findings suggest that both criteria might be potentially used to preferentially assess abnormal IASD in the setting of clinical practice.