Antibody feedback in germinal center (GC) responses plays a key role in shaping the affinity, specificity, and longevity of humoral immunity. Beyond neutralizing pathogens, antibodies influence B cell selection by modulating antigen availability and masking dominant epitopes, thereby reshaping the competitive landscape for T follicular helper (Tfh) cell support. This review outlines the current understanding of how antibody feedback governs the selection stringency and clonal evolution of GC B cells, facilitates and promotes the emergence of epitope spread, and contributes to GC shutdown. We also examine how it supports the development of broadly neutralizing antibodies. Finally, we discuss how these insights are informing next-generation vaccine strategies—including immunogen design, prime-boost regimens, and adjuvant optimization—to guide affinity maturation toward specific epitopes and overcome feedback-driven constraints. Understanding antibody feedback not only reveals fundamental principles of adaptive immunity but also offers new avenues for rational vaccine design and therapeutic immune modulation.
{"title":"Mastering Immunity: Antibody Feedback as a Driver of Germinal Center Fate and Vaccine Responses","authors":"Shuang Liu, Yang Zhang, Kai-Michael Toellner","doi":"10.1002/eji.70108","DOIUrl":"10.1002/eji.70108","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Antibody feedback in germinal center (GC) responses plays a key role in shaping the affinity, specificity, and longevity of humoral immunity. Beyond neutralizing pathogens, antibodies influence B cell selection by modulating antigen availability and masking dominant epitopes, thereby reshaping the competitive landscape for T follicular helper (Tfh) cell support. This review outlines the current understanding of how antibody feedback governs the selection stringency and clonal evolution of GC B cells, facilitates and promotes the emergence of epitope spread, and contributes to GC shutdown. We also examine how it supports the development of broadly neutralizing antibodies. Finally, we discuss how these insights are informing next-generation vaccine strategies—including immunogen design, prime-boost regimens, and adjuvant optimization—to guide affinity maturation toward specific epitopes and overcome feedback-driven constraints. Understanding antibody feedback not only reveals fundamental principles of adaptive immunity but also offers new avenues for rational vaccine design and therapeutic immune modulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":165,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Immunology","volume":"55 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12716205/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145792873","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Group 3 innate lymphoid cells (ILC3s) are tissue-resident lymphocytes distributed across both lymphoid and non-lymphoid tissues, capable of mounting rapid immune responses. They are defined by expression of the transcription factor RORγt and comprise distinct subsets, including lymphoid tissue inducer-like cells expressing major histocompatibility complex class II (MHCII). These MHCII⁺ ILC3s can directly present antigens to CD4⁺ T cells, a function regulated by the transcriptional activator CIITA through a pathway similar to thymic epithelial cells. ILC3s contribute to immune homeostasis by limiting effector T cell responses and promoting regulatory T cell differentiation. However, under the influence of distinct cytokine milieus, such as IL-1β and IFN-γ, ILC3s undergo a maturation process, upregulating costimulatory molecules and enhancing their antigen-presenting capacity to activate CD4⁺ T cells. This dual functionality is highly plastic and influenced by tissue-specific environmental cues, enabling ILC3s to adapt their immunoregulatory roles according to local context. Overall, ILC3s now emerge as critical modulators of T cell activities, balancing tolerance and activation, with significant implications for host defense, autoimmunity, inflammation, and cancer.
{"title":"The Antigen Presenting Capabilities of Group 3 Innate Lymphoid Cells: Insights Into Immunogenic or Tolerogenic Outcomes for T Cells","authors":"Alessia Calabrò, Sayuri Yamazaki, Guido Ferlazzo, Stefania Campana","doi":"10.1002/eji.70103","DOIUrl":"10.1002/eji.70103","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Group 3 innate lymphoid cells (ILC3s) are tissue-resident lymphocytes distributed across both lymphoid and non-lymphoid tissues, capable of mounting rapid immune responses. They are defined by expression of the transcription factor RORγt and comprise distinct subsets, including lymphoid tissue inducer-like cells expressing major histocompatibility complex class II (MHCII). These MHCII⁺ ILC3s can directly present antigens to CD4⁺ T cells, a function regulated by the transcriptional activator CIITA through a pathway similar to thymic epithelial cells. ILC3s contribute to immune homeostasis by limiting effector T cell responses and promoting regulatory T cell differentiation. However, under the influence of distinct cytokine milieus, such as IL-1β and IFN-γ, ILC3s undergo a <i>maturation</i> process, upregulating costimulatory molecules and enhancing their antigen-presenting capacity to activate CD4⁺ T cells. This dual functionality is highly plastic and influenced by tissue-specific environmental cues, enabling ILC3s to adapt their immunoregulatory roles according to local context. Overall, ILC3s now emerge as critical modulators of T cell activities, balancing tolerance and activation, with significant implications for host defense, autoimmunity, inflammation, and cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":165,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Immunology","volume":"55 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12712874/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145772940","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Liis Haljasmägi, Sandra Meisalu, Vincent Bondet, Pärt Peterson, Darragh Duffy, Kai Kisand
Selecting a sensitive test system is crucial to measure IFNα in serum samples. Simoa digital ELISA stands out for its high sensitivity and strong correlation with transcript-based IFN-induced gene (ISG) scores. In SLE, the ISG score is explained by circulating IFNα levels with negligible contribution from IFNβ or IFNγ. Created in BioRender.